TableTalk - Rev. River Devereux
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 10 сен 2024
- Recorded back in March, I sat down with Rev. River Devereux in my own home and discussed a number of big issues, including our own review of Dune 2, which we saw the night before recording.
~~~
My official website & blog: www.theotherpa...
Follow me on Gab: gab.com/Paulos
Become a financial supporter: theotherpaul.l...
Join the official Discord server (The Theocrat Lounge): / discord
Listen to streams in Podcast Format: anchor.fm/the-...
Follow my social media & consider supporting my ministry in other ways. All links are here: linktr.ee/The_...
male friendship is such a beautiful thing 💪
I should clarify one of my statements.
Anglicans and Presbyterians have many differences. Anglicans have a higher view of church authority and tradition, we have the Apocrypha in our Bible, we worship liturgically, we are Episcopal, we have vestments and call our pastors priests, we follow the normative principle, we have a different view of the monarchy, and the Articles are more broad than the Westminister confession.
However, *practically* speaking, the only differences that I think matter that much are Episcopacy and liturgy. The other differences can be agreed to disagree on and don't have much of an impact really.
I'm a recent Christian convert, baptised in Presbyterian church on Christmas Eve, but am recently loving Reformed Anglicanism thanks to the likes of you two. Definitely a cool community forming on RUclips.
I find the author character analogy to explain God’s sovereignty and human free will so compelling. Great discussion! Praying for you both.
Great conversation, very illuminating
Great conversation!
Is that on the table the book called the doctrine the church stands or falls on? I have it on my TV stand 😆
1:10:10 based River
I look at God allowing bad things and not being responsible is due to his passivity rather than his activity. Passively allowing something is not the same as causing something to happen.
I get the impulse to think that, but it doesn't account for the scriptures I quoted where God incites bad actions
Come on Other Paul, You could have gone down to Middle Earth.
I will be soon 😎
Paul seeing visions of the future doesn't support the idea that the Messianic prophecies are real. The Bene Jezeret were, apart from the prophecies, attempting to create a mind that can bridge time and space, and Paul's mother believed that she had created that mind with Paul, which is why she taught him, even though he was a man. The visions prove that she had at least partially succeeded.
For a moment I thought you were talking about the Apostle Paul and was about to flip lolol
@@catfinity8799 silence, skeptic; the Mahdi is speaking.
@@WonRyatt_9000same lol
58:32
Hmm the only way I could be a Calvinist is if annihilatism or universalism are true. If someone has a recommendation for a book on how creating a person for ECT for God’s glory does not make God a monster (and unjust, unmerciful, and unloving).
What level of evil does anybody deserve ECT to you?
Paul and I do not believe in ECT, and think those in hell will be eventually annihilated.
@@newkingdommedia9434 I've not studied the issue much...is such a view present in the Fathers?
@@MarkTodd-yc1zd not that I've seen, though some of them were universalists, such as Gregory of Nyssa. I think our view has more than enough Biblical support though, and I'd even say the ECT position lacks sufficient Biblical support.
@@jermur5338 Also Excusing Sinners and Blaming God by Guillaume Bignon is a good book for this