The Elite: How do we end world poverty? The Elite: We eradicate the poor. Depopulation, Vaccination, Abortion, Wars, Create Famine, Cancer, Poison Food & Water Just some tools of The Elites to Eradicate Poverty
This is so inspiring!! I'm going to school right now for my mental health certification and I have so much to say about this video. I agree with everything about this. I grew up poor and still in my 30s poor trying to make it work and am now being told I cannot continue my education just because of where I reside. on top of it all i have several disabilities and struggle daily. I am fighting it of course and will continue to fight and plan to help end poverty as well.
To save you some time she basically said,#1 don't rely on hand outs and the government. #2 work with your community and neighbors to get stuff done. #3 Educate your children so they aren't in the same situation. All three points are highly recommend.
That’s not the answer though the answer is blind action of the distribution of all the trillions of dollars that should go right to people in a form of a million dollar check !!!
I disagree with your #1. She was talking to you/me. We are the ones not treating the root of the problem. We are the haves and they are the have nots. It is easy for us to pass the buck and stand in judgment but obviously, many of us have not walked in their shoes.
@@DigitalLoom nope, structural change is necessary, programs are necessary, not a million dollar check that is going to cause inflation and then vanish in years.
"How china was lifted out of poverty." Good videos. USA could learn a few lessons. Also intergenerational kids are slower learners because parents fail to see the effects of drug and alcohol use on the fetus.
@@neverendingparty2060 money is just a pass to resources that we made, we have more food than enough to end world hunger, and yet, the ultimate reason someone dies of hunger today is becaus they didn't have money(read: permission) to have food and avoid death
@@SovereignStatesman Not sure what you mean, but as far as I know there is quite a lot consensus about not being sick. Who are the slaves and dictators?
@@vsiegel The World Health Organization measures "not being sick" by average lifespan; while the slaves are those who are deprived of choices regarding their own definitions of education and health.
A habit of saving is a proven way to rise out of poverty, but our government poverty programs punish saving. If you have money in the bank, you can't get temporary help out of a rough patch. People learn not to bother saving. If they get a big EITC "tax refund," they blow it immediately in order to avoid losing their benefits. As a result they never have the resources to deal with a setback.
this is spot on. if you're disabled in the U.S. and have medicaid to supplement Medicare, you are allowed $2000 in assets, typically. $2000. If you lose your home, can you find another one to move into with only $2000? The whole system was set up to promote dependence on the government across the whole spectrum of existence, including housing. The problem is that - besides being a killer of self-worth - that there is not and never will be enough government subsidized housing for people with disabilities. This model must end.
Also this system of capitalism is set up to keep you HAVING to buy stuff...just think at how often you need to repair (and don't even get me started on cars) something especially with all the cheaply made products from china things just don't last like they used to. refrigerators , stoves , washers, dryers, these essential household items could really set a struggling family back especially if the keep needing repairs..and again CAR is a WHOLE separate can of beans!!!
So true. My wife and I know a young couple from church with 2 children that have always lived on government aid. WIC, disability and several others. The husband is a mechanic but only takes cash so he doesn't report income. Last year they got over $8,000 tax refund. The wife made the comment, " It's free money!" I was so mad I corrected her by saying, "It's not free. I PAID that much in taxes. So you got money that I worked hard for." Now they're expecting another child and will get even more aid. So the cycle continues.
Simple solution, don't rely on welfare to fund your children's future. I am serious. These democratic institutions are made to keep the poor beneath the poverty level. It is an endless feedback loop that makes poor folks addicted to social welfare (that needs you to make a minimum or sub-minimum wage). My immigrant parents suffered from the same thing, but they worked without government support; that is the only way to build and sustain wealth in this world. Working for yourself.
4:06 "Too often we focus on the immediate human needs without addressing the issues that create them" That sounds like how we deal with all our problems in this country. We don't want to do the hard work to fix the root causes, we'd much rather slap a bandaid on and let someone else figure it out in the future.
That's not completely our fault as citizens, that's the money in politics and the class war waged against us by the bourgeois (elite ruling class/ owners of the means of production). Where we do have the most fault is letting corporate power and rich elites fully capture our government. We have to get the money out 1st before we can ever accomplish anything else.
@Public Guy Here’s the thing-no one has to lose money to erase poverty, we need to copy Finland’s education system. It wouldn’t cost a dime more than current spending. We spend the same amount per student. And from what Ive seen the better education gets the higher the median income goes-slowly but surely. We don’t need to rob the 1 percent we just need to restructure education system, it’s a fairly simple concept, and sure the transition and planning might take a little funding but not much... And there are plenty added benefits to a restructure of education including but not limited to, cheaper healthcare (obesity is linked with poverty), less crime, and less police interaction which leads to less cases of police brutality. Look, the point I’m trying to make is that it isn’t a question of money, but a question of how you spend the money you have... Edit I’m not saying it is the fault of the “common folk”
@@publicguy1664 I’m just making this comment in hopes that you see my comment above it because I accidentally forgot to reply to the first time to you and now I’m not sure you will see it...
It is delusional, even preposterous for someone to fault the person in poverty for their circumstances. I remember us having to live without heat for a year with a newborn daughter due to affordability. There were even times when we had to choose between food or paying the electricity bill. I listened to your story about the young lady losing her home. It reminds me of us trying to find someplace to stay when we had no place to stay. I am a witness that poverty does mess with your heart, mind, body, soul, and spirit. I agree with her points and when we are on one accord, change takes place. Even though this video is from 2016, it is still relevant today. Thank you Teva, God bless you, and may your journey continue in a lifetime of success!
When seeking the right answers, we must first seek to ask the right questions. Seek the long term build, not the temporary fix. Give a man a fish, feed him for a night. Teach a man to fish, and feed him for a lifetime. Politics feeds on poverty, yet milks the worker, and creates laws of enslavement on every level, engulfing all aspects of life.
some people are just oblivious but honestly working 40+ hours a week and getting paid low wages is simply a form of modern day slavery Tbh our time / life is the most valuable thing in the world we all are here on Earth for a matter of years and most Americans waste half of there precious life working just to barley get by trying to provide for family / pay bills ect , sadly some not ever owning houses cars nice things because they could never afford it much less having anything to pass down to the next generation 😭 it's the reality for millions and it's so tragic
@@hollycruz5061 If you look in the dictionary the definition of ingratitude is whining about a forty hour work week while watching a video on a global information network which houses the entirety of human knowledge in the comfort of a climate controlled dwelling.
The comments here seem to suggest that a 40 hour week with one worker who could support an entire family in the US at one time. This may have been true in the late 40's and 50's up to the late 60's but was far from the normal state of affairs in the US, and indeed much of the European and English speaking world. People forget the depression of the 1930's and the war based economies of the 40's where all family members working 60 or 70 hour weeks with very high taxes and enormous social obligations was the norm. It seems to me that the era from 1949 to 1969 was a sort of victory bonus for workers in the US, major tasks such as rebuilding Europe, defending against Russian aggression in the cold war etc meant that all able bodied workers were sorely needed and paid reasonably good wages. This is no longer the case, most manufactured items consumed by US and Europe are now made in the Far East and South Asia. Even the Chinese can no longer compete with the likes of Vietnam, Bangladesh etc as low wage centers of work. It is a false-hood to think that the present difficulties are unique or that other generations had a free ride and an easy time of it in their lives. Each 75 year lifetime will have its difficult times which need to be overcome in some form or another.
Does anybody notice what is missing here? It's not really a "what" but a "who" and the "who" is Dad. I happen to be a parent myself and I can testify that the idea of successfully raising children alone is absolutely mind-boggling to me: to never have somebody else to rely on, to never be allowed to have the flu or start dinner before you get home, somebody to go to the supermarket or watch the kids while you do. These families headed by teenage girls will always be at a disadvantage to households of two parents and no amount of raising the minimum wage and government housing can really work until we restore the two parent household.
As if single mother house holds are the only ones who exist. As shown in this video, it is the only one being addressed. There are very little resources available for the single father households versus the single mothers. I went to apply for aid as I am a single parent of two, and have been for over10 years. And I can personally say that there are no locations near me for help. I had to work two jobs myself to try to support my children. The only reason it wasn't a third was because we were living with family. The support places around laugh you out of the building. Not very helpful there either.
Statistically speaking it is the Father, But there are single fathers that are trying to raise children. Responsibility is a huge issue here. As in finish school, focus on a career, and other things that fall in that category, Then you can start a family, but with that said, our divorce rate is really high, and that would lead to single parenthood. So the question is how do we stop the cycle of the single parenthood, split up families, It has to start with the parents teaching there children morals, responsibility, hard work, etc. etc. Children that grow up in a single parent home is at a much higher risk to be a single parent also. So the cycle goes on and on. 50+ years ago it was common for most woman to stay home to be quote housewives while the father goes out and brings home the paycheck. Todays time thats almost impossible do to wages and cost of living also many other factors, I see everyday parent(s) struggle just trying to put food on the table and its very sad.
Heath - Don't know where you live, but I know churches have programs to help families. I don't believe the program at my Church refuses help to single parent households. You have to go to the Office - to request help. Asking a Churchgoer for money usually won't get it done. The programs have stable members to mentor people with parenting, budgeting, education, housing, furnishings, etc.
@@heathbruce9928 I have to ask, just like with the single mothers: Why are you raising them on your own? Did she just leave you? Did she go insane? Did she die? Or did you just leave her? Why havn't you looked for a partner to share your burden with? I personally decided never to have kids, because I know couldn't handle having to live with a partner for endless years.
I became a divorced non tertiary educated single parent of one at 28 years old. I stopped at 1 child. Worked 2 jobs. Paid my mortgage and bills. No social life, no dating, I’m a non drinker, non smoker, no holidays, no new furniture or clothes until I was 42. Any incidental money went on extra lessons etc for my daughter. I’m now 57 still work - but now I am mortgage free, travelled. Sacrifice. Delay gratification. Work ethic, focus, purpose., the ability to save. Stop consuming. Self responsibility. My now 28 year old daughter was like me and not academic - she started a Saturday dishwashing job at 15. From 16 she worked weekends and school holidays. Left school at 16 with no qualifications but only after she had a fullt8me job. She has worked full time ever since. She is a good saver , non drinker. This year she bought her first home alone in the hot Auckland market. Life skills and stubborn focus and not education is what solves poverty.
It disturbing that the blame is placed solely on society. It is a fact that systemic structures significantly contribute to poverty yet individual choices are just as significant.
Naw.the system is more guilty... The system creates the dysfunctional environment that results in so many "bad choices" that iso many Americans are making... Bad choices are a byproduct of a lack of education.. bad educational systems created the uninformed individuals... We create a better system better choices will be the byproduct... Systems matter greatly
Unfortunately that was nearly 13 minutes of motivational speaking that didnt offer one single idea in how to address the actual problems she kept hinting at. Vague comments on complex issues bring nothing to the table.
@@rianroth1652 she said do a community survey 2. teach skills at a community center 3. ppl keep voicing their opinion. She was kind of vague and rushed it tho.
I also want to make awareness of public transportation. People are often choosing between cars or homes because of the price. Cars are very expensive. Some people don't even have car insurance, maybe due to history of driving. Enhancing public transportation can eliminate a lot of those issues. It can make it more affordable to live in a home.
Try getting a job without an address. Try getting a job without the right clothes. Try talking to a bank, bill collectors, collection agency when you cannot pay without losing your home, without going to a food bank while working 3 jobs. Try working full time with a sick child. It's not as easy as many think. I am fortunate. My parents helped. They had the resources to do so. My late husband's family did not and would not. There is much more than just getting a job or 2 or 3.
This is so true. Yet there are lots of self-righteous people who say there are enough good jobs and affordable homes for everyone. The self-righteous think that is true and that it lets them off the hook.
then your parents could have helped buy you a proper set of clothes for interviews and invested in a resume writing service and job interview service to get a decent job
As I said, I was truly fortunate that my parents were there to help me ( and my husband ) and I will be forever grateful to them for doing those things for me. Not everyone has parents like mine.
Teva is so correct . Please listen to what she is saying . Poverty is caused by unrealistic expectations on the cost of just , existing , and is perpetuated by the ignorance of how our society is actually structured , to create unnecessary competition , to benefit the few .
It's such heart broken to hear someone has a talk about poverty and get so close to the true cause and yet so far away like everyone else. Poverty is caused by the structure of the system yet not that you can change without flipping the system upside down, which is not anyone but a dictator with great heart and wisdom can achieve. Put as much effort you want, but at the end, without the structural changes of the system, it makes no difference at the end of the day.
I want this woman to run for public office. She makes such a difference in her capacity at her non-profit, but her values and oratory skills are needed in local, state, and national government. I want us to have a military corps of social scientists devoted to solving poverty and inefficiency. That would be my goal. A well-funded unit of experts using our tax money to solve real world problems.
Teva is correct about addressing the issues that are the causes of poverty. The economic system that many people live in is unpredictable that having a big family is a luxury and to indulge leads to a wealth hazard and not just a health hazard.
She's already talked about the solution and how she did it in last mininutes. Maybe you know as much as her but she did things to the community. How about you?
It can never happen as long as we refuse to call out bad behavior, and continue to subsidize bad behavior. Some decisions are better than others. And some decisions are just terrible, and lead to a cycle of poverty.
@@Baboonfromdatoon 1) Dropping out of high school, 2) having a kid before marriage, 3) getting married before 20. Avoiding those three things means you have a 92% chance of avoiding poverty. Those are just 3 examples.
@@Baboonfromdatoon Inane response there, dude. There ARE people who should experience poverty. Lazy people for example. If you're able to work but unwilling, you should be poor. Additionally, if you're UNWILLING to correct poor life choices that put you in a bad place, then you should have to live with those consequences. (If you're willing to change but need help, THOSE are the folks we should be helping.) Stop being enabling. The original poster was correct.
Having been raised in poverty myself (stealing food, sleeping under bridges, ....) upon graduation, I spent two years working for the poor in Alabama (USA). Most of the middle class community did their BEST FOR the poor - but the less fortunates had an incentive to remain in a state of dependency: 1- More kids out-of-wedlock (i.e. without a father) were born - the state was paying, they were not using birth control as it would prevent them from having children (child=federal/state money), 2- Kids were not completing high-school - "it is hard/boring to study" - they repeated the same mistakes as their absent fathers/elders, 3- Many young adults did not want to work the jobs available (jobs were available, they were physical or required some training which my "clients" did not want to invest in, and did PAY). They made more by living at the expense of the tax payers/state/federal government and being free considering than "being boxed-in a regular job". Lets us stop blaming the system! Our society can help but poor people have to really want to get themselves out of misery (see three issues above); take their responsibilities, society cannot do that for them. Ciao, L (former Public Health official)
Community is the key. That is why your new goals are working. People need a village to succeed. They are relying more on eachother and less on the government and other handouts. I applaud you and the people of the community you helped.
Poverty cannot be eliminated because of human nature which is self-centred and absolutely selfish but well disguised. We all want to be rich but to be rich we must make and keep others poor. Why? Because if everyone is rich, then no one is rich. How many would admit to this?
I've been financially challenged for most of my life. As noble as her goals are, I have found that using a socialistic agenda doesn't work to solve poverty. Been there done that in my life. I found that work helps. I learned that I needed to know how heavy I was on others without being strong enough to lift and carry myself. So, I developed a plan. As a poor man this is what I need to succeed. Get government out of health-care and welfare. Put welfare at the doors of the churches completely. Fix the food starting at the soil. 13 minerals won't cut it. We need 77 minerals and poor people are lacking most of them. Focus on fats (3), amino acids (12), minerals (77), and vitamins (17). Now, set up small aquaponic green houses and neighborhood gardens growing small animals, fish, and hydroponic vegetables. Use the poor that are benefiting as labor to plant and harvest. Feed them from their own labor. Then the magic... they will grow too much for themselves. Think, better then organic food, chicken, rabbits, escargot, fish, and things like escargot caviar (sells for around $89.00 an ounce). Way less money to start and run. Healthier poor people. People that know how to grow the best food on earth as graduates. The income potential is very good. Capitalism solves problems better then begging from the quasi rich.
Poverty is a two-prong problem. To end it requires personal responsibility of a poor person. ALSO, it requires outward opportunity to pull that poor person out. It's about the inner and outer. A poor person needs the discipline it requires to received an education, BUT they also must be provided with a quality education to begin with. To stay in good health a poor person must develop nutritious eating habits, BUT a poor person must have ready access to nutritious food. A poor person has to stay off of drugs, BUT they also need affordable housing. Do you see where I'm going here? If we do nothing but point fingers this problem will never be solved.
We spend too much time telling the poor how they should live and not enough time listening to them talk and trying to understand what their life is really like. We are all talk and no listening.
Bravo Teva, I've been saying this for years. You cannot achieve success with most huge problems UNLESS, they are resolved at a national or global level.
The good speaker has well articulated the complex issues of poverty and inspiringly articulated that "leaving poverty education to the realm of the heart only, is dismissive of the seriousness of the problem we are trying to address", but she fell short of actually not doing that. Id advise the speaker to spend some years digging deeper into the myriad of deep academic and policy research in these issues, and marry these to her deep real frontline experiences. That can be very powerful insights for rest of the world.
All poor people have to do is live flawless, monastic lives of unrelenting discipline, never get sick, not form families, never spend more than the absolute living minimum, and work three jobs.
BrownHawk2 Only in America do we believe that if you work hard, you can climb your way out of poverty no matter what. Sure, it’s possible, if you’re given the opportunity to do so. That’s always the caveat. Many people in this country have never been and never will be given that opportunity (people of color, disabled, mentally ill, etc). So when you say people should wait until they can afford child rearing, it’s a fallacy. It will never happen for many. And that in itself is a classist way of thinking about reproduction. The right to have offspring should not be contingent on a certain income level, otherwise you imply that the systems of power that keep people poor should also prevent them from rearing children. I don’t know about you, but I certainly don’t have a problem with tax dollars helping someone raise children when their job amounts to charity work for corporate America. As long as corporate America is paying their fair share of taxes...
Keep going lady . You keep the lead ,so give ways and eventually,if they make sense ,people will start to do them . But first, you kinda got to show them how .
My theology professor used to always say that abject poverty will end when economists study ending poverty as vigorously as they study creating more wealth for the wealthy. When the same energy and investment goes into ending poverty as into creating wealth abject poverty will end. That doesn’t mean that everyone will have the same amount. It means everyone will have a roof over their head and food to eat.
I haven't even listened to this yet, and I know how to end poverty. Hitch said it twenty years ago. "To end poverty, simply empower women." Now I'll listen to it and see if that's what she says, and who she attributes it to...
Those single mothers seem pretty empowered to me. They made all their decisions. Seems to me they might be better off if they were a little less 'empowered'
Sad. Fatherless families are also to blame. Men need to "man up" to the table and be fathers to their children. Teva you're a good person and I love you're approach to this. Open volunteerism and exercising liberty. God bless you.
That is the importance of marriage! But the so called liberty also creates radicals like the modern infinite way feminism movement. If men "manning up" is somehow offensive, then it doesn't offer much leverage to criticise fathers who leave. What you said is definitely factually correct.
NO...NO...NO!!! WOMEN NEED TO BE MARRIED AND FINANCIALLY STABLE BEFORE THEY HAVE THEIR CHILDREN!!! PERIOD!!! WOMEN MUST STOP LAYING DOWN AND PROCREATING WITH MEN THAT DO NOT CARE ANYTHING ABOUT THEM!!! PERIOD!!! WHEN ARE WOMEN GOING TO FORCED TO BE ACCOUNTABLE FORR THEIR ACTIONS???!!! PLEASE REPLY WITH HONEST FEEDBACK!!!
@@Arnsteel634 its like that old riddle what comes first the chicken or the egg men need to be good men too , it is 50/50 balance and its Mothers we should Learn from as well as fathers
I hope that this talk is simply using the "Single Mothers" examples and almost entire absence of the word "Father" (instead using "Parents") intentionally to avoid people thinking "Why aren't the MEN taking responsibility for this?" as a way to try to avoid doing anything to "fix" the problem of poverty. But I worry that the lack of mention of "Fathers" in this is an indication that they're more concerned with a current Ideology than with actually ending Poverty. One of the quickest ways out of poverty is having two parents - and generally, if we're looking at a single-mother, that's a straight woman, so having the father of the child(ren) in her life is an option. And the mention of "Community" and "Community coming together" only feeds that particular worry that this is ideologically driven, as it's indicating that we aren't bringing a family together but a community of families all working together - and the example given indicates a community of Single Mothers coming together to fight for a playground and rent protection. I worry that this might actually make the problem WORSE; it may perpetuate the growing problem of Men not feeling like they need to stick around AND Women not feeling that they need Men to stick around. Essentially, it is helping to perpetuate a gender-segregation at a time when bringing them together is more effective and important.
Because men are a tiny number of the people who need support services. It is women who overwhelmingly bear the economic brunt of poverty. Please do some work and educate yourself about your privilege.
Virgil. I'm sending this now it's been a year sense you wrote. Just interested. What progress have you seen. I find in my hood people are not even interested in talking to you.
Did anyone ever explain to Jackie that getting pregnant in High School is a very bad idea both to yourself and the baby? Is Jackie's "baby daddy" supporting the child? It doesn't sound like it. Was Jackie's father involved? Is Jackie, a high school drop out, skilled enough, to make the big box store money if they were to pay her a living wage? Now that everyone is mad at me, let me say the following: It sounds like the program is doing good. It is getting parents more involved in their children's lives. This alone should help reduce teen pregnancy, which will lead to fewer drop outs, both of which will go a long way to ending poverty. It sounds like the programs. A hand out is not what people need; it is direction that will end poverty. Keep up the good work.
:) Not everyone is mad at you. My wife knows a co worker who has 6 children from two different fathers, neither of whom provide support. She has been on welfare continually since before her first child. She works only part-time because her welfare checks are reduced dramatically the more hours she works. Her oldest daughter is now pregnant in her junior year in high school. The system is perpetuating the problem.
I'm a mathematician that became a public school alternative education math teacher. I sacrificed income to fight this problem. What I learned is that poverty, and its associated problems, are not a result of a failure in our systems. They are the planned result of systems that are carefully designed to maintain poverty. The working poor are simply a replacement for the slaves that built this country. Even criminals have become a cash cow for those on the other side of the fence. We have enough resources to provide food, housing, healthcare and education for everyone in this country. But it is more profitable to keep people struggling for things that we have sitting at the ready.
A child is tens of times more expensive than a luxury car. As a society, we are shocked at the very idea of someone who can't afford to pay their bills taking ownership of a top of the line Mercedes. Yet a single person having a child with no clear idea of how to support it is accepted as just a fact of life. Would it not be wiser to roll out a comprehensive, national education program targeted at pre-teens that discourages bringing a life into the world that you can't care for? We do it with smoking, drunk driving and other social behaviors that put strain on our society and its resources. Waiting until there is another child born into poverty seems too late.
Jesus was a Child , wouldnt you sell your merc for him?? we as men worship the Automobile so much its mind boggeling, im a victim of it and would wish all motor vehicles be supplied by the governments , fuel as well , then and only then we could have more Jesuses running around oh and female Jesuses too : )
It's a very good presentation and great strategy. However, I've been working on development for more than 25 years and I find it very very difficult to keep it sustainable from one generation to another
We need a dual member family to make this work. That means having a viable and functional FATHER as a member of the family. Every thing else is a compensation for this lack.
of course it is never actual compensation but an attempt to rid guilt in a very wicked society which leaves a bad taste in the social programer's mouth
Bravo! Thank You so much Ms. Teva Sienicki for this much needed talk. You are right it is not just poor people who are to blame for being poor ... never has been (although there are certain individual exceptions to every situation). It is a systemic problem and has to be addressed by everyone ... I Love that you have started in the community program and would love to see more of this sort of awareness and effort. And when you said, "we need to do things "With" Instead of "For" ... Bravo ... while everyone has different levels of ability be they poor or rich ... we tend to tackle the poverty problem as if everyone who is poor has if they have low intelligence ... or as if they are lazy or unable in ways we just assume rather than Know of ... The problems behind poverty are complex ... and will require effort in many different forms but again your effort is so appreciated. Love & Peace to All
Excellent and valuable talk! The "it is dismissive ..." statement at 3:42+ that received reflex applause, was implausibly complex to receive such applause so quickly. It may be true but it is far too vaguely explained. The audience had obviously heard it before. Regardless; Heilbroner and Milberg already solved the problem in their book: "The making of Economic Society." It's not the economy it's the mal-distribution of income. Part of this problem is the "city." Even in China people are leaving the cities to go back to livable farms with no money. The "working with people" statement was very important.
yes, the old people have to pollinate the fruit trees by hand due to the city pollution killing off the bees and still the young people ripe for breeding congregate in the cities and i doubt any return to the country movement will out weigh the birth rate of the major bloated cities of china.
At 5:05 the presenter tells a story of a new mother who had triplets and works at a fast food restaurant, all under the pretenses that if jobs paid a "living wage," her problems would be solved. That is not true. Her problems are her decision making. Those who are working in entry level employment have no business having children. That's a devastating decision a person can make for themselves and their child(ren). It's patently immoral to condemn children to a life of poverty based on your own selfish desires to have them.
It's been proven time and time again that rule of law is the best solution to improve a nation's economy. A country needs to let industry flourish and get out of its way by streamlining and standardising their bureaucracy. A huge reason why a lot of African countries are poor is because they are either controlled by a monarch, a crazy dictator or worse their own military. To truly let them flourish, these countries need to establish free market capitalism in their country and also implement democracy.
Is U.S. a country of rule of law? Doesn't U.S. have flourishing industries? So, why is Teva talking about poverty in the U.S.? Did you miss the summary part of her talk?
As Adam Carolla states; the answer is "Family and Education". 100% of those moms who enter a shelter represents a failure of a family. The 1st support structure is your family. To paraphrase Teva Sienicki; not supporting families is like " war on diabetes by setting up more clinic for the blind. Relying on the "goodness of strangers" is not a good strategy. Family and Education. With just these two pillars of support, a wealth and prosperous society will grow.
Excellent! The whole person. Help to survive. Tools to live and flourish. Living wages. Without the raising prices that return people back to where they started.
Among people who, (1) Finish High School, (2) Do not get married before age 21, and (3) Do not have children until they are married, Long term chronic poverty is virtually statistically ZERO. Poor decisions have poor outcomes, who knew?
Met a fiance college graduate working for doordash and uber who blows his money of nights out and partying, so being financially literate doesn't really mean anything.
@@iwontreplybacklol7481 Going to school and being educated are two completely different things. Apparently he was not financially literate regardless of his degree. Or he didn't care and was choosing to live that way.
One thing I noticed about her initial story of the woman and kids in the shelter was that there was never mention of a father. Now maybe he died or something, but I find that there are a lot of men that are not owning up to their responsibilities when making children. It is a lot easier to provide for a child in a two income home. People need to take some personal responsibility when making children and wonder they could afford it or not. We need to make stronger child support laws so that the burden of childhood poverty does not fall on the rest of society.
Abstain until marriage, Stop eating out, live within your means, learn a skilled trade. Welding, HVAC, Plummer, Electrician, etc. Low tuition, high pay.
So, please explain to me, how does this create jobs? I don't have children, I don't eat out, I can't live within my means unless I become homeless, I am well educated (Electronic Engineer, Civil Engineer, Teacher, Tradesman, Veteran) but there are no jobs. The big issue is inability for people to find a job with adequate hours and pay, or even a job at all. How you live has no bearing on this. And what is a plummer? Someone who picks plums?
at the same time alienated half of the parenting equation...so much for equal rights vanished into air of prejudice from top to bottom providing fertile ground for social programing to the max
Ms. Sienicki’s talk was heart-felt, well-intended and an appreciated contribution to a difficult and complex topic. However, correct me if I’m wrong, but she seems to have misinterpreted the Harvard study she mentioned in her talk. As she described, the study noted that people from certain geographic areas were better educated and had higher standards of living than average. It appears to me that the social networks in these geographic areas used peer-support and peer-pressure to create higher educational and living standards for their people. Ms. Sienicki then spoke of her group’s efforts to foster night-schooling and social networks among single moms and other people in an impoverished neighbourhood. Her idea is that a school-centred neighbourhood will improve standards of living. The Harvard study did not imply that education levels created higher standards of living, and I don’t think they do, even though that is something I once taught. I now believe that isn’t so. It’s the social network that creates a standard of living. I believe Ms. Sienicki would have greater success if her group fostered long-term relationships between people in her impoverished neighbourhood and people in wealthier neighbourhoods, creating new social networks to improve education and living standards. Such a task wouldn’t be easy but could be worthwhile.
I love how she didn’t even mention the importance of “personal choice” She stated that Jackie got pregnant in high school which forced her to drop out and led to her losing her home....but she never addressed how all of that would have been avoided if Jackie hadn’t of gotten pregnant in the first place...why can’t anyone just take responsibility for their bad choices??????
She has some good ideas. There are three sure-fire ways to avoid poverty: 1) Finish high school, 2) don't have a kid until you're married, and don't marry until you're 20. If you do these, research says you have a 92% chance of avoiding poverty. Add to that 4) avoid drugs and alcohol, and my guess is the percentage approaches 100%.
I skipped right to the end where she finally gets to the point. The reality is that we are NOT trying to solve poverty or world hunger. If you look at the comments you can see the viciousness and the ignorance of your average world citizen that despite allllllll the evidence think that many people DESERVE their poverty. Poverty is MANUFACTORED so that the military can fill it's ranks with obedient mindless soldiers. It's manufactured so that wealthy people can own acres and acres of land while the average citizen just rents tiny spaces that often never become their own. It's manufactured by the wealthy to serve the whims of the wealthy. The sad truth is that people like Tesla(greatest inventor of all time) were TRYING to share their ideas freely and to move us into a kinder more sustainable society...and we let the Edison's of the world put a patent on everything that should have just been considered COMMON WEALTH just like the air we breathe. Had more of been able to see the trajectory of unhindered greed...we'd have taken a better path. We'd be living the good life in a way that would make things like pandemics and war to be just things of the past. The powers that be WANT chaos on some level so they can maintain their own wealth. It works for them that poor people are propping them up and essentially doing all the hard labor and "drudge" work. I think automation is maybe the only thing giving me hope right now because it seems to hold the key for win-win future where NOBODY has to work all that hard and the systems in place essentially take care of themselves in a way that we only see with something like phone updates. Even cell phone advancements are being stagnated by companies trying to control the market rather than just giving people what they want. If people would just using their imaginations for a second they could understand the power of coding, programming, and automating a life that allows us to live in harmony with nature and in harmony with our own bodies' needs. Farming can be automated. People can work much less. Entire houses can be 3D printed. Long story short is that if TRUE innovation is allowed and encouraged....poverty can be automated out of existence. The Earth is filled with life sustaining water, land that grows food with or without our consent, and a sun the offers free power to everyone that is allowed to harness it. It's merely a matter of CHOOSING common good and common wealth over the wants of few.
@@MaruskaStarshaya...THE PROBLEM IS THE SINGLE MOTHER BUT NO ONE IS ADDRESSING THE REAL PROBLEM!!! WOMEN MUST NOT HAVE ANY CHILDREN UNTIL THEY ARE MARRIED AND FINANCIALLY STABLE. WHEN YOU LOOK AT THE POVERTY RATES OF INDIVIDUALS IN AMERICA, THE HIGHEST RATE OF POVERTY IS WITH THE SINGLE MOTHERS!!! THIS IS A FACT!!! SO, WHY ISN'T ANYONE EXCEPT FOR ME TELLING WOMEN NOT TO HAVE ANY CHILDREN UNTIL THEY ARE MARRIED AND FINANCIALLY STABLE? IS IT THIS WAY BECAUSE WOMEN DO NOT WANT TO BE ACCOUNTABLE FOR THEIR ACTIONS AND GET ANGRY WHEN SOMEONE TELLS THEM TO BE? PLEASE REPLY WITH HONEST FEEDBACK!
Where are the father's? Why are they not being held financially accountable? She wants more money,change jobs. BTW it's not Jackie's fault she's poor it's her mother's choice. And by default her non existent dad's. Third wave feminism and welfare are the biggest ones at fault.
How to be rich faster Be single Be antisocial Be independent Be a workaholic Finish school Get a degree And ignore all of your constant psychological traumas and disorders due to your desperate need of succeeding And that's pretty much it. Now go and make some money my friend. Best of luck.
So true! But you forgot to mention; Go out and make lots of money so you can pay a shitload of taxes so that the woman who made this video can redistribute your money to the poor people which is really codename for people with a low IQ.
Marc Stephan Nkouly You don't have enough to eat because you wasted time being in the statetheist brainwashing camps they call school instead of doing real work, learning real skills. Schools keep people unskilled and useless, and deluded into entitlement mentality. And it gets people deep into debt.
poverty will never end, ive seen ppl purposely live out on the streets even tho they clearly knowingly had good options to get off the street. some was crazy......however some sane.
I was born into poverty but when I was growing up I was always ahead of the class still am still when she said that studies show impoverished kids fall behind without a statistic like 2 in 4 or 3 in 4 because not all poor kids are behind I was ahead, and so was my little brother, but that was mostly because our mom taught us her college work at very young ages. so to that statement here is a short story on how that isn't always the case, and most if not all my friends are poor but lot's are very smart and either average or higher.
Thanks, Teva....I never dreamed it was so easy to eliminate the bad choices that certain percentages of human have always made. That was a smaller problem before the do gooders with the worship of government programs started trying to eliminate poverty by throwing other people's money at it. You will always get more of the behavior you reward. Individual responsibility is the only program that is tried and true. Capitalism is not perfect but has done more for the human condition than any other man made system. Your educated naivete is impressive indeed and I'm sure in your own mind you will succeed in your endeavors.
Good choices are easier when you are rich which is why the "certain percentage of human" who make good choices generally align with the percentage that are not poor. But when you are poor, good choices are harder and less accessible. We may never eliminate the human nature that urges us to make bad choices but we have a responsibility to make good choices more accessible for everyone. If making a bad choice bars some people from having good choices available, then there is no point in asking individuals to take responsibility because what are they gonna choose but bad choices? And why should making good choices available for all be so far fetched when talking to someone across a two year timeline is not far fetched?
@@juliantheapostate8295 just Reading alone is a challenge for many , also with new commers to each nation the language barrier is very difficult, with translaters on these phones could help i would believe. but Language and communication plus economics would be top two , just had an idea the Constituiton of america should drop few off the list and put as example the second amendment " the right to economics" and "Learn Latin or Greek or what ever is your nations Language" Peace...
According to the Brookings Institute, if you do these three things, you won't remain poor. 1.) Graduate high school. 2.) Get a job. 3.) Wait on children until after your married. Less than 2% of children from poor families that do these three things are poor as adults.
Education is higher in the US than ever before. More aid money is spent than ever before. Yet poverty increases. Poverty is not about resources, it's a state of mind. As long as we teach people it's not their fault and that it's some one else's problem, you undermine the rest of what you teach. You can't teach self sufficiency skills without teaching self sufficiency mindset - which is personal responsibility. That's not blaming people for being poverty. All kinds of things can happen that we don't plan for through no control of our own. But that's all the more reason why we need to take control of that which we can. Not to be callous, but frankly, Jackie's problem was not the government failed her, but her mother and those teaching her. She was not taught to think of the consequences of her actions. She made selfish choices with no concern for the consequence. To her, the warm, comfortable shelter was always an option - a safety net so that she didn't have to be responsible. Of course I have no idea of the details of that case specifically, but as presented, she was more likely to be back than not. That doesn't mean the government and public shouldn't help people, but the mindset has to change for the cycle to change.
“Of course I have no idea of the details of the case specifically, but . . “ - Your words. You don’t know, but you give this long comment. Just listen.
@@JB-vb6dh - If you bothered to read my comment, only a small part of it was dedicated to the case of Jackie. I did listen. Did you? It's possible that jackie was married or in a committed relationship and became widowed right away, rr that she was financially well off but through some natural disaster or unexpected event lost everything, but if that happened, don't you think the speaker would have shared that? She shared that a young woman, which a child old enough that she was likely still a child when she was born, was back in the shelter obviously making choices that brought her back. In the speakers words, she suggested te very thing when describing why jackie's coming back was a problem. Maybe you should read for understanding before commenting? Just a thought.
Summary: A long-winding emotional charade which revolves around having a strong goal - to end poverty - without any explicit steps or empirical data to back that up.
Yeah. She said that McDonalds worker should be paid a living wage. She would’ve been laid off if workers at fast food restaurants were paid living wages. The education thing I agree with though. But public spending has increased in the educations system but no real results. Wasted money. Wanna end poverty. Drop regulations in businesses, lower taxes and cut useless spending,
well, the speaker gets their own poverty ended by political means via the academia community that is totally on the dole of the taxpayers and a major contributor to poverty instead away from poverty...see, i can be long winded too!
We need to start looking at all work as important, anyone who works deserves a living wage. Fast food workers shouldn't be considered lower than anyone. What could be more important than feeding our families? Anyone who works and provides a service to society should be treated with the dignity they rightfully deserve and compensated fairly. People shouldn't be judged by what they do, but by the fact they they contribute to the well being of everyone by working if they are able. We have waged war on the poor for far too long, have created a class system that shouldn't exist if we call ourselves a democracy.
Of course all work is important, the real question is: "how many people can and are willing to do the same job for a cheaper price?" I thought this was the heart of the free market. Although flipping burgers is important, this job goes to the lowest bidder and there are a LOT of bidders because it is a relatively unskilled job. The free market will always incentivise ones who are more capable and penalise those who aren't. Rather than compensating burger flippers 'fairly', it is more important to include in their employment packages paths to progress. That includes learning new skills and making appropriate connections. Only then can they maintain a competitive edge and sustain themselves in this economy. Burger flippers need to ask their employers not for a raise, but for more opportunities. That to me is far more important than a raise. I can tolerate poverty as long as I know there is a prospect and hope for a better future. But if your employer was determined to keep you enslaved in that minimum wage job, you either need to really love flipping burgers or you need to start looking for a better job.
this is wrong. why should every work deserve a living wage? the price reflects value of a certain type of work. if flippnig burgers, lets say, costs 15$ per hour but only produces 12$ surplus value, it have to subsidised,which means that you have to make the burgers more expensive. so again, no more the living wage,as prices rise. not every job is equally important,thats why judges arent payed as bad as someone who flips burgers. price is always a measure for the inherent value.
Actually, I think the mindset, system and pressure for nearly everyone be required to work in order to make a living is one of biggest reasons for poverty. In an industrialized nation people have the potential to output far more than they consume. And increases in efficiency requires fewer and fewer people to distribute these goods and services to the public. This means that there is an ever increasing proportion of people that are not really required to contribute in order to sustain the economy, but because they still need to acquire money in order to make ends meet they must find ways to siphon wealth out of the system. This results in a bloated service sector that provides low wages, inefficient and low value work. Rather than having those people in poverty scramble for these jobs and scrape together money in order to get by, it would likely be better to just provide for them in exchange for some light community and cultural involvement and responsibility. By halting the endless cycle of continually needing to scramble for money in exchange for fulfilling some public or personal responsibilities, these people may be able to genuinely pursue personal improvement and help towards bettering society.
JVW she lacks energy though I understand why.... because as a people we don't give everybody equal chance at success I and many others have work diligently a gotten little in the form of success.
She had one solution, which was concerted effort towards community improvement and involvement, along with additional education opportunities. What she was lacking was any high level system changes that could effectively or potentially remedy the systemic issues.
We need to get these people Grooving. Spending some time surrendering to The One Groove & contributing to the global community's energy. Groovism is our belief system. "Be with The One" , an achievable, instinctive, therapy!!
The real issue that everyone misses is that the middle class is not even making enough money to save! That is what she is saying. We live in a system that punishes people who save. Well, let me back track a little... What people should have been doing was whenever you have a little extra money, put in a mutual fund. That way the money is still circulating. However, people stopped investing. So, circulation heavily slowed. Causing high taxes and inflation. Now the middle class has fallen behind inflation and now the money is not as powerful as it should be. The middle class has not received a raise in over a decade as everything else is getting more expensive. Now the middle class has no money to save nor invest...
The three best ways to Overcome poverty: 1) Family planning, 2) family planning, and 3) family planning. No one should have any child until he or she is in a stable financial situation.
hey, here's the wrap :- I don't work for money, I work only for myself, but my work produces no income. Am I a bludger because I was born disabled? I work, but need support in order to achieve some kind of decent life. What I don't get is that poverty could be stopped entirely with just a few strokes of a pen. Trouble is, our politicians are the true bludgers. They start and fight wars instead of committing to a world where there is less deliberate killing. Remember, soldiers are paid murderers. That's it. My rant.
Do you have family? Do they care about you? Do you care about people who have cancer? Or about old and alone people? You guys always think only about yourselves and blame others for doing the same.
Murder is a crime. Soldiers are not commiting crimes as they are doing what society asks of them. They are more like heros and you owe your existence to them but thats my rant.
I admire the work described here. And I agree with almost everything she’s said. But here’s why we as a nation will always have appallingly high poverty: Because as a nation, we don’t care. I’ve heard the rhetorical question ‘How can the wealthiest nation on the planet have 20% of its children live in poverty?’ raised many times. And it should be raised over and over again because this fact is shameful. It’s when you talk about state and federal government that it breaks down. Why? The answer lies in our history. Look at how we have become the wealthiest country on Earth. It’s not through compassion or through wanting to take on poverty head on. Not a few national initiatives have tried and failed. Poverty in this country can only really be addressed at the local level, one block at a time. The US is too cruel a country to allow for any other way.
5 лет назад+1
What you see as cruelty others see as reality; and what you decide is charity others will derive as cruelty. European nations, despite having better systems for the lower classes, are all extremely dependent upon the US to do so. What you wish, and how it will be achieved, is a solution that may well damn more people than it saves. It's the idealistic that tend to commit mass genocide, after all.
Stephen Jenkins true but that ‘reality ‘ does not make it justifiable. The US is a cruel country. Again if you look at history, we endure cycles of extreme depression in pursuit of this appallingly high inequality (wealth and social mobility). On your point about other countries, I think it’s time we stop thinking ‘either-or’, either Che communista or robber barren capitalist. Look at for example the platform of Andrew Yang.
One of my life goals is that if tokenization could create a livable good retirement ecosystem for retirees and disabled , retired people, I would be happy to see it implemented by any company.
Did she just compare poverty in the U.S. to China?! A human is **objectively** and **physically** better off being poor in the west than being in the middle class in China. And then she slams charities by saying they aren't "serious". What a mindless and heartless tool. TED needs to find an actual expert on this issue.
In my city, the people in the nicest schools redistricted in such a way so as to make sure that demographic changes prevented any low income people from being in elementary schools with their children.
The speaker is correct. ACEs study indicates the severe damage of poverty on children under the age of five.. Look also at the wage gap, about 84% male to female at this time, a change of about 20 cents per hour since I was 20. It's even worse for Spanish and African American women. I am now 72 and my wage is still not comparable to what a man makes in my profession. I have over 20 years experience in my 25 years working as a therapist. I read a couple of years ago of the uphill battle of an organization trying to get subsidized housing in a neighborhood. It took five years to get the community to agree. Her ideas are spot on. Brilliant idea! I wish five years later that this was common across the U.S. I forgot to add two other important issues, racism and domestic violence. A community such as this would be a built-in support network for the women and their children.
During COVID isolation I've been bingeing on these Tedx talks. This is one of the best I've come across, on any subject.
No wonder you’ve been ‘isolated’ by a normal pathogen that has no difference in impact than any average annual pathogen.
The Elite: How do we end world poverty?
The Elite: We eradicate the poor.
Depopulation, Vaccination, Abortion, Wars, Create Famine, Cancer, Poison Food & Water Just some tools of The Elites to Eradicate Poverty
@@surferxblood but if they eradicate the lower class, wouldn’t there be a new lower class?
You should check out Rutger Bergman’s TED talk. He has some amazing insights on the issue as well.
@@evanprice5470 Rutger Bregman writer/historian from the Netherlands.
This is so inspiring!! I'm going to school right now for my mental health certification and I have so much to say about this video. I agree with everything about this. I grew up poor and still in my 30s poor trying to make it work and am now being told I cannot continue my education just because of where I reside. on top of it all i have several disabilities and struggle daily. I am fighting it of course and will continue to fight and plan to help end poverty as well.
To save you some time she basically said,#1 don't rely on hand outs and the government. #2 work with your community and neighbors to get stuff done. #3 Educate your children so they aren't in the same situation. All three points are highly recommend.
That’s not the answer though the answer is blind action of the distribution of all the trillions of dollars that should go right to people in a form of a million dollar check !!!
I disagree with your #1. She was talking to you/me. We are the ones not treating the root of the problem. We are the haves and they are the have nots. It is easy for us to pass the buck and stand in judgment but obviously, many of us have not walked in their shoes.
@@DigitalLoom nope, structural change is necessary, programs are necessary, not a million dollar check that is going to cause inflation and then vanish in years.
Thanks man, I was about to waste my time
"How china was lifted out of poverty." Good videos. USA could learn a few lessons. Also intergenerational kids are slower learners because parents fail to see the effects of drug and alcohol use on the fetus.
There is big money in oversight of poverty. That's it.
It is all about the DOLLARS AND CENTS. Pretty much the source of MOST of our problems.
Like ive always said..."where humans went wrong in our evolution , began when we started to covet shiney worthless things."
No it's not, no money, no goods to buy, less jobs, no money. You need people to have excess money to spend on other things to make money
@@neverendingparty2060 money is just a pass to resources that we made, we have more food than enough to end world hunger, and yet, the ultimate reason someone dies of hunger today is becaus they didn't have money(read: permission) to have food and avoid death
Gail Lewis: no, the people do not consent to their government.
THAT'S "it."
You could solve that as a stone-cold economical problem: Invest in having healthy, educated citizens. Others did it, it pays.
You mean SLAVES. People have different ideas about what constitutes health and education.
Other are DICTATORS.
@@SovereignStatesman Not sure what you mean, but as far as I know there is quite a lot consensus about not being sick. Who are the slaves and dictators?
This requires people to be documented, and legally in the country, contributing. As long as you don't push the socialist mental disease...
@@vsiegel The World Health Organization measures "not being sick" by average lifespan; while the slaves are those who are deprived of choices regarding their own definitions of education and health.
ya mean not paying for people who don't have their act together by any stretch of the imagination, to procreate?
A habit of saving is a proven way to rise out of poverty, but our government poverty programs punish saving. If you have money in the bank, you can't get temporary help out of a rough patch. People learn not to bother saving. If they get a big EITC "tax refund," they blow it immediately in order to avoid losing their benefits. As a result they never have the resources to deal with a setback.
this is spot on. if you're disabled in the U.S. and have medicaid to supplement Medicare, you are allowed $2000 in assets, typically. $2000. If you lose your home, can you find another one to move into with only $2000? The whole system was set up to promote dependence on the government across the whole spectrum of existence, including housing. The problem is that - besides being a killer of self-worth - that there is not and never will be enough government subsidized housing for people with disabilities. This model must end.
Also this system of capitalism is set up to keep you HAVING to buy stuff...just think at how often you need to repair (and don't even get me started on cars) something especially with all the cheaply made products from china things just don't last like they used to. refrigerators , stoves , washers, dryers, these essential household items could really set a struggling family back especially if the keep needing repairs..and again CAR is a WHOLE separate can of beans!!!
So true. My wife and I know a young couple from church with 2 children that have always lived on government aid. WIC, disability and several others. The husband is a mechanic but only takes cash so he doesn't report income. Last year they got over $8,000 tax refund. The wife made the comment, " It's free money!" I was so mad I corrected her by saying, "It's not free. I PAID that much in taxes. So you got money that I worked hard for." Now they're expecting another child and will get even more aid. So the cycle continues.
Simple solution, don't rely on welfare to fund your children's future. I am serious. These democratic institutions are made to keep the poor beneath the poverty level. It is an endless feedback loop that makes poor folks addicted to social welfare (that needs you to make a minimum or sub-minimum wage). My immigrant parents suffered from the same thing, but they worked without government support; that is the only way to build and sustain wealth in this world. Working for yourself.
Never thought about it from that perspective
4:06 "Too often we focus on the immediate human needs without addressing the issues that create them"
That sounds like how we deal with all our problems in this country. We don't want to do the hard work to fix the root causes, we'd much rather slap a bandaid on and let someone else figure it out in the future.
That's not completely our fault as citizens, that's the money in politics and the class war waged against us by the bourgeois (elite ruling class/ owners of the means of production). Where we do have the most fault is letting corporate power and rich elites fully capture our government. We have to get the money out 1st before we can ever accomplish anything else.
@Public Guy
Here’s the thing-no one has to lose money to erase poverty, we need to copy Finland’s education system. It wouldn’t cost a dime more than current spending. We spend the same amount per student. And from what Ive seen the better education gets the higher the median income goes-slowly but surely. We don’t need to rob the 1 percent we just need to restructure education system, it’s a fairly simple concept, and sure the transition and planning might take a little funding but not much... And there are plenty added benefits to a restructure of education including but not limited to, cheaper healthcare (obesity is linked with poverty), less crime, and less police interaction which leads to less cases of police brutality. Look, the point I’m trying to make is that it isn’t a question of money, but a question of how you spend the money you have...
Edit I’m not saying it is the fault of the “common folk”
@@publicguy1664 I’m just making this comment in hopes that you see my comment above it because I accidentally forgot to reply to the first time to you and now I’m not sure you will see it...
It is delusional, even preposterous for someone to fault the person in poverty for their circumstances. I remember us having to live without heat for a year with a newborn daughter due to affordability. There were even times when we had to choose between food or paying the electricity bill. I listened to your story about the young lady losing her home. It reminds me of us trying to find someplace to stay when we had no place to stay. I am a witness that poverty does mess with your heart, mind, body, soul, and spirit. I agree with her points and when we are on one accord, change takes place. Even though this video is from 2016, it is still relevant today. Thank you Teva, God bless you, and may your journey continue in a lifetime of success!
When seeking the right answers, we must first seek to ask the right questions. Seek the long term build, not the temporary fix. Give a man a fish, feed him for a night. Teach a man to fish, and feed him for a lifetime. Politics feeds on poverty, yet milks the worker, and creates laws of enslavement on every level, engulfing all aspects of life.
The best thing I have read today!
Thanks a lot for sharing this amazing concept!
May Allah bless you!
some people are just oblivious but honestly working 40+ hours a week and getting paid low wages is simply a form of modern day slavery Tbh our time / life is the most valuable thing in the world we all are here on Earth for a matter of years and most Americans waste half of there precious life working just to barley get by trying to provide for family / pay bills ect , sadly some not ever owning houses cars nice things because they could never afford it much less having anything to pass down to the next generation 😭 it's the reality for millions and it's so tragic
@@hollycruz5061 Slavery was never truly abolished, it just morphed and became all inclusive.
@@hollycruz5061 If you look in the dictionary the definition of ingratitude is whining about a forty hour work week while watching a video on a global information network which houses the entirety of human knowledge in the comfort of a climate controlled dwelling.
@@67cuda38 "Slavery a form of economy based upon the absorption of oxygen and the exhalation of carbon dioxide" Good call you nailed it.
Teva Sienicki, you're a woman to my heart and mind! Great presentation and fully coming from the core of your being. Thank you
now if she can present viable solution then enlightenment arrives
The comments here seem to suggest that a 40 hour week with one worker who could support an entire family in the US at one time. This may have been true in the late 40's and 50's up to the late 60's but was far from the normal state of affairs in the US, and indeed much of the European and English speaking world. People forget the depression of the 1930's and the war based economies of the 40's where all family members working 60 or 70 hour weeks with very high taxes and enormous social obligations was the norm. It seems to me that the era from 1949 to 1969 was a sort of victory bonus for workers in the US, major tasks such as rebuilding Europe, defending against Russian aggression in the cold war etc meant that all able bodied workers were sorely needed and paid reasonably good wages. This is no longer the case, most manufactured items consumed by US and Europe are now made in the Far East and South Asia. Even the Chinese can no longer compete with the likes of Vietnam, Bangladesh etc as low wage centers of work. It is a false-hood to think that the present difficulties are unique or that other generations had a free ride and an easy time of it in their lives. Each 75 year lifetime will have its difficult times which need to be overcome in some form or another.
Does anybody notice what is missing here? It's not really a "what" but a "who" and the "who" is Dad. I happen to be a parent myself and I can testify that the idea of successfully raising children alone is absolutely mind-boggling to me: to never have somebody else to rely on, to never be allowed to have the flu or start dinner before you get home, somebody to go to the supermarket or watch the kids while you do. These families headed by teenage girls will always be at a disadvantage to households of two parents and no amount of raising the minimum wage and government housing can really work until we restore the two parent household.
As if single mother house holds are the only ones who exist. As shown in this video, it is the only one being addressed. There are very little resources available for the single father households versus the single mothers. I went to apply for aid as I am a single parent of two, and have been for over10 years. And I can personally say that there are no locations near me for help. I had to work two jobs myself to try to support my children. The only reason it wasn't a third was because we were living with family. The support places around laugh you out of the building. Not very helpful there either.
Statistically speaking it is the Father, But there are single fathers that are trying to raise children. Responsibility is a huge issue here. As in finish school, focus on a career, and other things that fall in that category, Then you can start a family, but with that said, our divorce rate is really high, and that would lead to single parenthood. So the question is how do we stop the cycle of the single parenthood, split up families, It has to start with the parents teaching there children morals, responsibility, hard work, etc. etc. Children that grow up in a single parent home is at a much higher risk to be a single parent also. So the cycle goes on and on. 50+ years ago it was common for most woman to stay home to be quote housewives while the father goes out and brings home the paycheck. Todays time thats almost impossible do to wages and cost of living also many other factors, I see everyday parent(s) struggle just trying to put food on the table and its very sad.
Feminism at its best
Great post
Heath - Don't know where you live, but I know churches have programs to help families. I don't believe the program at my Church refuses help to single parent households. You have to go to the Office - to request help. Asking a Churchgoer for money usually won't get it done. The programs have stable members to mentor people with parenting, budgeting, education, housing, furnishings, etc.
@@heathbruce9928 I have to ask, just like with the single mothers: Why are you raising them on your own? Did she just leave you? Did she go insane? Did she die? Or did you just leave her? Why havn't you looked for a partner to share your burden with?
I personally decided never to have kids, because I know couldn't handle having to live with a partner for endless years.
I became a divorced non tertiary educated single parent of one at 28 years old. I stopped at 1 child. Worked 2 jobs. Paid my mortgage and bills.
No social life, no dating, I’m a non drinker, non smoker, no holidays, no new furniture or clothes until I was 42. Any incidental money went on extra lessons etc for my daughter. I’m now 57 still work - but now I am mortgage free, travelled.
Sacrifice. Delay gratification. Work ethic, focus, purpose., the ability to save. Stop consuming. Self responsibility.
My now 28 year old daughter was like me and not academic - she started a Saturday dishwashing job at 15. From 16 she worked weekends and school holidays. Left school at 16 with no qualifications but only after she had a fullt8me job. She has worked full time ever since. She is a good saver , non drinker. This year she bought her first home alone in the hot Auckland market.
Life skills and stubborn focus and not education is what solves poverty.
People don't really want to be told how to succeed. They just want free stuff and they don't care how it's paid for
I’ve been hooked on TED Talks since college. Love these so much!!
It disturbing that the blame is placed solely on society. It is a fact that systemic structures significantly contribute to poverty yet individual choices are just as significant.
Naw.the system is more guilty... The system creates the dysfunctional environment that results in so many "bad choices" that iso many Americans are making... Bad choices are a byproduct of a lack of education.. bad educational systems created the uninformed individuals... We create a better system better choices will be the byproduct... Systems matter greatly
Unfortunately that was nearly 13 minutes of motivational speaking that didnt offer one single idea in how to address the actual problems she kept hinting at.
Vague comments on complex issues bring nothing to the table.
If you don't hear "go take all money from middle class" it doesn't mean she didn't give a solution
I don’t believe that you watch the entirety of the video.
bruh, she's just addresing, not really proposing a solution dum dum
@@rianroth1652 she said do a community survey 2. teach skills at a community center 3. ppl keep voicing their opinion. She was kind of vague and rushed it tho.
You basically just exposed the entire Christian doctrine
Once we learn how to love one another and treat people fair and equal. We can do miracles. Thank God for people like you.
I also want to make awareness of public transportation. People are often choosing between cars or homes because of the price. Cars are very expensive. Some people don't even have car insurance, maybe due to history of driving. Enhancing public transportation can eliminate a lot of those issues. It can make it more affordable to live in a home.
Try getting a job without an address. Try getting a job without the right clothes. Try talking to a bank, bill collectors, collection agency when you cannot pay without losing your home, without going to a food bank while working 3 jobs. Try working full time with a sick child. It's not as easy as many think. I am fortunate. My parents helped. They had the resources to do so. My late husband's family did not and would not. There is much more than just getting a job or 2 or 3.
This is so true. Yet there are lots of self-righteous people who say there are enough good jobs and affordable homes for everyone. The self-righteous think that is true and that it lets them off the hook.
then your parents could have helped buy you a proper set of clothes for interviews and invested in a resume writing service and job interview service to get a decent job
As I said, I was truly fortunate that my parents were there to help me ( and my husband ) and I will be forever grateful to them for doing those things for me. Not everyone has parents like mine.
@@charlieoscar2339 some families are gone in an instant and still humans continue on earth...nobody gets out alive
Teva is so correct . Please listen to what she is saying . Poverty is caused by unrealistic expectations on the cost of just , existing , and is perpetuated by the ignorance of how our society is actually structured , to create unnecessary competition , to benefit the few .
It's such heart broken to hear someone has a talk about poverty and get so close to the true cause and yet so far away like everyone else. Poverty is caused by the structure of the system yet not that you can change without flipping the system upside down, which is not anyone but a dictator with great heart and wisdom can achieve. Put as much effort you want, but at the end, without the structural changes of the system, it makes no difference at the end of the day.
❤️💚💛
I want this woman to run for public office. She makes such a difference in her capacity at her non-profit, but her values and oratory skills are needed in local, state, and national government.
I want us to have a military corps of social scientists devoted to solving poverty and inefficiency. That would be my goal. A well-funded unit of experts using our tax money to solve real world problems.
Teva Sienicki, you are a badass, warrior woman! Thank you for your voice.
Teva is correct about addressing the issues that are the causes of poverty. The economic system that many people live in is unpredictable that having a big family is a luxury and to indulge leads to a wealth hazard and not just a health hazard.
"start breaking down the crushing systems that keep people there"
She didn't tell me anything I didn't already know. No solutions discussed.
exactly
She's already talked about the solution and how she did it in last mininutes. Maybe you know as much as her but she did things to the community. How about you?
Lol fr
It can never happen as long as we refuse to call out bad behavior, and continue to subsidize bad behavior. Some decisions are better than others. And some decisions are just terrible, and lead to a cycle of poverty.
what 'bad behaviour'
@@Baboonfromdatoon 1) Dropping out of high school, 2) having a kid before marriage, 3) getting married before 20. Avoiding those three things means you have a 92% chance of avoiding poverty.
Those are just 3 examples.
@@michaelfreeman5381 nobody should experience poverty, stop being judgemental
@@Baboonfromdatoon Inane response there, dude. There ARE people who should experience poverty. Lazy people for example. If you're able to work but unwilling, you should be poor.
Additionally, if you're UNWILLING to correct poor life choices that put you in a bad place, then you should have to live with those consequences. (If you're willing to change but need help, THOSE are the folks we should be helping.)
Stop being enabling. The original poster was correct.
@@michaelfreeman5381 what about people who are poor because of RACISM?
Having been raised in poverty myself (stealing food, sleeping under bridges, ....) upon graduation, I spent two years working for the poor in Alabama (USA). Most of the middle class community did their BEST FOR the poor - but the less fortunates had an incentive to remain in a state of dependency:
1- More kids out-of-wedlock (i.e. without a father) were born - the state was paying, they were not using birth control as it would prevent them from having children (child=federal/state money),
2- Kids were not completing high-school - "it is hard/boring to study" - they repeated the same mistakes as their absent fathers/elders,
3- Many young adults did not want to work the jobs available (jobs were available, they were physical or required some training which my "clients" did not want to invest in, and did PAY). They made more by living at the expense of the tax payers/state/federal government and being free considering than "being boxed-in a regular job".
Lets us stop blaming the system! Our society can help but poor people have to really want to get themselves out of misery (see three issues above); take their responsibilities, society cannot do that for them. Ciao, L (former Public Health official)
ah, the old "pick your up by the bootstraps" adage. ok boomer
the fathers were and are not absent...they are in prison or killed in the military death cult
Community is the key. That is why your new goals are working. People need a village to succeed. They are relying more on eachother and less on the government and other handouts. I applaud you and the people of the community you helped.
Poverty cannot be eliminated because of human nature which is self-centred and absolutely selfish but well disguised. We all want to be rich but to be rich we must make and keep others poor. Why? Because if everyone is rich, then no one is rich. How many would admit to this?
So ridiculous for the rest of the world when people from the US talk about poverty.
I've been financially challenged for most of my life. As noble as her goals are, I have found that using a socialistic agenda doesn't work to solve poverty. Been there done that in my life. I found that work helps. I learned that I needed to know how heavy I was on others without being strong enough to lift and carry myself. So, I developed a plan. As a poor man this is what I need to succeed. Get government out of health-care and welfare. Put welfare at the doors of the churches completely. Fix the food starting at the soil. 13 minerals won't cut it. We need 77 minerals and poor people are lacking most of them. Focus on fats (3), amino acids (12), minerals (77), and vitamins (17). Now, set up small aquaponic green houses and neighborhood gardens growing small animals, fish, and hydroponic vegetables. Use the poor that are benefiting as labor to plant and harvest. Feed them from their own labor. Then the magic... they will grow too much for themselves. Think, better then organic food, chicken, rabbits, escargot, fish, and things like escargot caviar (sells for around $89.00 an ounce). Way less money to start and run. Healthier poor people. People that know how to grow the best food on earth as graduates. The income potential is very good. Capitalism solves problems better then begging from the quasi rich.
Crackpot
Poverty is a two-prong problem. To end it requires personal responsibility of a poor person. ALSO, it requires outward opportunity to pull that poor person out. It's about the inner and outer. A poor person needs the discipline it requires to received an education, BUT they also must be provided with a quality education to begin with. To stay in good health a poor person must develop nutritious eating habits, BUT a poor person must have ready access to nutritious food. A poor person has to stay off of drugs, BUT they also need affordable housing. Do you see where I'm going here? If we do nothing but point fingers this problem will never be solved.
BLAH BLAH BLAH "I don't want to get involved"
And you know this how?
Intuition and guesswork. I could be wrong. Hopefully I am.
I volunteered last month helping with a homeless shower truck where I live.
We spend too much time telling the poor how they should live and not enough time listening to them talk and trying to understand what their life is really like. We are all talk and no listening.
Bravo Teva, I've been saying this for years. You cannot achieve success with most huge problems UNLESS, they are resolved at a national or global level.
The good speaker has well articulated the complex issues of poverty and inspiringly articulated that "leaving poverty education to the realm of the heart only, is dismissive of the seriousness of the problem we are trying to address", but she fell short of actually not doing that.
Id advise the speaker to spend some years digging deeper into the myriad of deep academic and policy research in these issues, and marry these to her deep real frontline experiences. That can be very powerful insights for rest of the world.
Universal access to birth control would be a good start to combating poverty.
All poor people have to do is live flawless, monastic lives of unrelenting discipline, never get sick, not form families, never spend more than the absolute living minimum, and work three jobs.
HAHA...America sucks
This guy gets it.
If only famous people did that
thats me.
BrownHawk2
Only in America do we believe that if you work hard, you can climb your way out of poverty no matter what. Sure, it’s possible, if you’re given the opportunity to do so. That’s always the caveat. Many people in this country have never been and never will be given that opportunity (people of color, disabled, mentally ill, etc).
So when you say people should wait until they can afford child rearing, it’s a fallacy. It will never happen for many. And that in itself is a classist way of thinking about reproduction. The right to have offspring should not be contingent on a certain income level, otherwise you imply that the systems of power that keep people poor should also prevent them from rearing children. I don’t know about you, but I certainly don’t have a problem with tax dollars helping someone raise children when their job amounts to charity work for corporate America. As long as corporate America is paying their fair share of taxes...
Keep going lady . You keep the lead ,so give ways and eventually,if they make sense ,people will start to do them . But first, you kinda got to show them how .
My theology professor used to always say that abject poverty will end when economists study ending poverty as vigorously as they study creating more wealth for the wealthy. When the same energy and investment goes into ending poverty as into creating wealth abject poverty will end. That doesn’t mean that everyone will have the same amount. It means everyone will have a roof over their head and food to eat.
I haven't even listened to this yet, and I know how to end poverty. Hitch said it twenty years ago. "To end poverty, simply empower women." Now I'll listen to it and see if that's what she says, and who she attributes it to...
Oh. I said "simple", not, "easy".
Getting men to give up even a little power is like pulling teeth.
@@louisesumrell6331 THey already did give up power in the sixties.
Those single mothers seem pretty empowered to me. They made all their decisions. Seems to me they might be better off if they were a little less 'empowered'
Sad. Fatherless families are also to blame. Men need to "man up" to the table and be fathers to their children. Teva you're a good person and I love you're approach to this. Open volunteerism and exercising liberty. God bless you.
That is the importance of marriage! But the so called liberty also creates radicals like the modern infinite way feminism movement. If men "manning up" is somehow offensive, then it doesn't offer much leverage to criticise fathers who leave. What you said is definitely factually correct.
NO...NO...NO!!! WOMEN NEED TO BE MARRIED AND FINANCIALLY STABLE BEFORE THEY HAVE THEIR CHILDREN!!! PERIOD!!! WOMEN MUST STOP LAYING DOWN AND PROCREATING WITH MEN THAT DO NOT CARE ANYTHING ABOUT THEM!!! PERIOD!!! WHEN ARE WOMEN GOING TO FORCED TO BE ACCOUNTABLE FORR THEIR ACTIONS???!!! PLEASE REPLY WITH HONEST FEEDBACK!!!
I think women need to woman up and be good wives and stop divorcing or driving men away.
People don't change. If you pick the wrong partner that's it, you're screwed
@@Arnsteel634 its like that old riddle what comes first the chicken or the egg men need to be good men too , it is 50/50 balance and its Mothers we should Learn from as well as fathers
I hope that this talk is simply using the "Single Mothers" examples and almost entire absence of the word "Father" (instead using "Parents") intentionally to avoid people thinking "Why aren't the MEN taking responsibility for this?" as a way to try to avoid doing anything to "fix" the problem of poverty.
But I worry that the lack of mention of "Fathers" in this is an indication that they're more concerned with a current Ideology than with actually ending Poverty. One of the quickest ways out of poverty is having two parents - and generally, if we're looking at a single-mother, that's a straight woman, so having the father of the child(ren) in her life is an option. And the mention of "Community" and "Community coming together" only feeds that particular worry that this is ideologically driven, as it's indicating that we aren't bringing a family together but a community of families all working together - and the example given indicates a community of Single Mothers coming together to fight for a playground and rent protection.
I worry that this might actually make the problem WORSE; it may perpetuate the growing problem of Men not feeling like they need to stick around AND Women not feeling that they need Men to stick around. Essentially, it is helping to perpetuate a gender-segregation at a time when bringing them together is more effective and important.
Shes not mentioning fathers because they don't really exist in this case.
Because men are a tiny number of the people who need support services. It is women who overwhelmingly bear the economic brunt of poverty. Please do some work and educate yourself about your privilege.
@@sacrificetosotec So women are a net cost to society - interesting
I am very proud to work for her and the mission that Metrocaring represent. Impact the place where they live !!!.
Virgil.
I'm sending this now it's been a year sense you wrote. Just interested. What progress have you seen. I find in my hood people are not even interested in talking to you.
pride is the sickness that keeps the human from improvement...no wonder there is no progress
She is looking at the bigger picture and addressing the core issues which is something politicians seem to lack
Exactly...
Yep...Its not in their best interest to fix the problem.....they would go out of business
Poverty is more a mindset than an economic status. If a person wants to change they have to change the way they think.
Watching this made me again reaffirm to not just let people with good hearts but bad brains be the only ones helping the poor.
Did anyone ever explain to Jackie that getting pregnant in High School is a very bad idea both to yourself and the baby? Is Jackie's "baby daddy" supporting the child? It doesn't sound like it. Was Jackie's father involved? Is Jackie, a high school drop out, skilled enough, to make the big box store money if they were to pay her a living wage? Now that everyone is mad at me, let me say the following:
It sounds like the program is doing good. It is getting parents more involved in their children's lives. This alone should help reduce teen pregnancy, which will lead to fewer drop outs, both of which will go a long way to ending poverty. It sounds like the programs. A hand out is not what people need; it is direction that will end poverty.
Keep up the good work.
:) Not everyone is mad at you. My wife knows a co worker who has 6 children from two different fathers, neither of whom provide support. She has been on welfare continually since before her first child. She works only part-time because her welfare checks are reduced dramatically the more hours she works. Her oldest daughter is now pregnant in her junior year in high school. The system is perpetuating the problem.
Step one: have a community meeting on whether or not 'Jackie' should have a kid.
I'm a mathematician that became a public school alternative education math teacher. I sacrificed income to fight this problem. What I learned is that poverty, and its associated problems, are not a result of a failure in our systems. They are the planned result of systems that are carefully designed to maintain poverty. The working poor are simply a replacement for the slaves that built this country. Even criminals have become a cash cow for those on the other side of the fence. We have enough resources to provide food, housing, healthcare and education for everyone in this country. But it is more profitable to keep people struggling for things that we have sitting at the ready.
A child is tens of times more expensive than a luxury car. As a society, we are shocked at the very idea of someone who can't afford to pay their bills taking ownership of a top of the line Mercedes. Yet a single person having a child with no clear idea of how to support it is accepted as just a fact of life. Would it not be wiser to roll out a comprehensive, national education program targeted at pre-teens that discourages bringing a life into the world that you can't care for? We do it with smoking, drunk driving and other social behaviors that put strain on our society and its resources. Waiting until there is another child born into poverty seems too late.
Jesus was a Child , wouldnt you sell your merc for him?? we as men worship the Automobile so much its mind boggeling, im a victim of it and would wish all motor vehicles be supplied by the governments , fuel as well , then and only then we could have more Jesuses running around oh and female Jesuses too : )
It's a very good presentation and great strategy. However, I've been working on development for more than 25 years and I find it very very difficult to keep it sustainable from one generation to another
and yet human beings continue on planet earth without ever asking your or my opinion about the matter
We need a dual member family to make this work. That means having a viable and functional FATHER as a member of the family. Every thing else is a compensation for this lack.
Repeal the no-man-in-the-house welfare policies and no-fault divorce.
of course it is never actual compensation but an attempt to rid guilt in a very wicked society which leaves a bad taste in the social programer's mouth
Bravo! Thank You so much Ms. Teva Sienicki for this much needed talk. You are right it is not just poor people who are to blame for being poor ... never has been (although there are certain individual exceptions to every situation). It is a systemic problem and has to be addressed by everyone ... I Love that you have started in the community program and would love to see more of this sort of awareness and effort. And when you said, "we need to do things "With" Instead of "For" ... Bravo ... while everyone has different levels of ability be they poor or rich ... we tend to tackle the poverty problem as if everyone who is poor has if they have low intelligence ... or as if they are lazy or unable in ways we just assume rather than Know of ... The problems behind poverty are complex ... and will require effort in many different forms but again your effort is so appreciated. Love & Peace to All
Excellent and valuable talk! The "it is dismissive ..." statement at 3:42+ that received reflex applause, was implausibly complex to receive such applause so quickly. It may be true but it is far too vaguely explained. The audience had obviously heard it before. Regardless; Heilbroner and Milberg already solved the problem in their book: "The making of Economic
Society." It's not the economy it's the mal-distribution of income. Part of this problem is the "city." Even in China people are leaving the cities to go back to livable farms with no money. The "working with people" statement was very important.
yes, the old people have to pollinate the fruit trees by hand due to the city pollution killing off the bees and still the young people ripe for breeding congregate in the cities and i doubt any return to the country movement will out weigh the birth rate of the major bloated cities of china.
@@daieast6305 Thank you for your thoughtful comment. Those cell phones better get to, educating better, quickly!
At 5:05 the presenter tells a story of a new mother who had triplets and works at a fast food restaurant, all under the pretenses that if jobs paid a "living wage," her problems would be solved. That is not true. Her problems are her decision making. Those who are working in entry level employment have no business having children. That's a devastating decision a person can make for themselves and their child(ren). It's patently immoral to condemn children to a life of poverty based on your own selfish desires to have them.
@Nin Shade She chose to take the risk
I respect this so much. Thank you for posting.
It's been proven time and time again that rule of law is the best solution to improve a nation's economy. A country needs to let industry flourish and get out of its way by streamlining and standardising their bureaucracy.
A huge reason why a lot of African countries are poor is because they are either controlled by a monarch, a crazy dictator or worse their own military. To truly let them flourish, these countries need to establish free market capitalism in their country and also implement democracy.
Is U.S. a country of rule of law? Doesn't U.S. have flourishing industries? So, why is Teva talking about poverty in the U.S.? Did you miss the summary part of her talk?
@@tfshao Just because a country has rule of law doesn't mean that there will not be a single poor person in that country.
As Adam Carolla states;
the answer is "Family and Education".
100% of those moms who enter a shelter
represents a failure of a family.
The 1st support structure is your family.
To paraphrase Teva Sienicki;
not supporting families is like "
war on diabetes by setting up more clinic for the blind.
Relying on the "goodness of strangers" is not a good strategy.
Family and Education.
With just these two pillars of support,
a wealth and prosperous society will grow.
Excellent! The whole person. Help to survive. Tools to live and flourish. Living wages. Without the raising prices that return people back to where they started.
Among people who, (1) Finish High School, (2) Do not get married before age 21, and (3) Do not have children until they are married, Long term chronic poverty is virtually statistically ZERO. Poor decisions have poor outcomes, who knew?
People can never get rich until and unless they are financially literate.
If you spend all your money or buy all you want you will be poor...
Met a fiance college graduate working for doordash and uber who blows his money of nights out and partying, so being financially literate doesn't really mean anything.
@@iwontreplybacklol7481 Going to school and being educated are two completely different things. Apparently he was not financially literate regardless of his degree.
Or he didn't care and was choosing to live that way.
Wow - A Powerful Message! Thank You for all you are doing to change the direction of Poverty in our community and the world.
One thing I noticed about her initial story of the woman and kids in the shelter was that there was never mention of a father. Now maybe he died or something, but I find that there are a lot of men that are not owning up to their responsibilities when making children. It is a lot easier to provide for a child in a two income home. People need to take some personal responsibility when making children and wonder they could afford it or not. We need to make stronger child support laws so that the burden of childhood poverty does not fall on the rest of society.
The fathers probably don't have any money either. So that wouldn't change anything.
I woke up this morning with exactly this question on my mind.
My only issue, is that families that cannot support children, should NOT have them! Why is this so hard to understand?!
Abstain until marriage, Stop eating out, live within your means, learn a skilled trade. Welding, HVAC, Plummer, Electrician, etc. Low tuition, high pay.
Ok, boomer
So, please explain to me, how does this create jobs?
I don't have children, I don't eat out, I can't live within my means unless I become homeless, I am well educated (Electronic Engineer, Civil Engineer, Teacher, Tradesman, Veteran) but there are no jobs.
The big issue is inability for people to find a job with adequate hours and pay, or even a job at all. How you live has no bearing on this.
And what is a plummer? Someone who picks plums?
What a Beautiful and Intelligent Woman. People like her restore some of my faith in Humanity.
oh yes, i see how humanity is doing in the world in 2020...wake up and look around you, dude....nap time is over!
We started with early childhood development.... or teaching people to be better parents.
at the same time alienated half of the parenting equation...so much for equal rights vanished into air of prejudice from top to bottom providing fertile ground for social programing to the max
Ms. Sienicki’s talk was heart-felt, well-intended and an appreciated contribution to a difficult and complex topic. However, correct me if I’m wrong, but she seems to have misinterpreted the Harvard study she mentioned in her talk. As she described, the study noted that people from certain geographic areas were better educated and had higher standards of living than average. It appears to me that the social networks in these geographic areas used peer-support and peer-pressure to create higher educational and living standards for their people. Ms. Sienicki then spoke of her group’s efforts to foster night-schooling and social networks among single moms and other people in an impoverished neighbourhood. Her idea is that a school-centred neighbourhood will improve standards of living. The Harvard study did not imply that education levels created higher standards of living, and I don’t think they do, even though that is something I once taught. I now believe that isn’t so. It’s the social network that creates a standard of living. I believe Ms. Sienicki would have greater success if her group fostered long-term relationships between people in her impoverished neighbourhood and people in wealthier neighbourhoods, creating new social networks to improve education and living standards. Such a task wouldn’t be easy but could be worthwhile.
War causes poverty,greed causes poverty. If you can't take care of yourself and your family, don't have them quit being selfish.
I love how she didn’t even mention the importance of “personal choice” She stated that Jackie got pregnant in high school which forced her to drop out and led to her losing her home....but she never addressed how all of that would have been avoided if Jackie hadn’t of gotten pregnant in the first place...why can’t anyone just take responsibility for their bad choices??????
they dont take responsabilities for their mistakes, they are communist, its not ones fault, is the "society"
because getting pregnant at any age shouldn’t ruin you financially.
@@juancassinerio1580 what does that have to do anything with communism?
@@thea8704 do you have the money to start that responsability?
@@juancassinerio1580 responsibility to what? To raise a child, definitely no.
You can't buy a decent house with an entry-level job, but you can have three children who are even more expensive.
@Usha It's the lack of 'judging' that gets people into such harsh circumstances in the first place
Thank you for your kindness. ❤️
She has some good ideas. There are three sure-fire ways to avoid poverty: 1) Finish high school, 2) don't have a kid until you're married, and don't marry until you're 20. If you do these, research says you have a 92% chance of avoiding poverty.
Add to that 4) avoid drugs and alcohol, and my guess is the percentage approaches 100%.
I skipped right to the end where she finally gets to the point. The reality is that we are NOT trying to solve poverty or world hunger. If you look at the comments you can see the viciousness and the ignorance of your average world citizen that despite allllllll the evidence think that many people DESERVE their poverty. Poverty is MANUFACTORED so that the military can fill it's ranks with obedient mindless soldiers. It's manufactured so that wealthy people can own acres and acres of land while the average citizen just rents tiny spaces that often never become their own. It's manufactured by the wealthy to serve the whims of the wealthy.
The sad truth is that people like Tesla(greatest inventor of all time) were TRYING to share their ideas freely and to move us into a kinder more sustainable society...and we let the Edison's of the world put a patent on everything that should have just been considered COMMON WEALTH just like the air we breathe. Had more of been able to see the trajectory of unhindered greed...we'd have taken a better path. We'd be living the good life in a way that would make things like pandemics and war to be just things of the past. The powers that be WANT chaos on some level so they can maintain their own wealth. It works for them that poor people are propping them up and essentially doing all the hard labor and "drudge" work.
I think automation is maybe the only thing giving me hope right now because it seems to hold the key for win-win future where NOBODY has to work all that hard and the systems in place essentially take care of themselves in a way that we only see with something like phone updates. Even cell phone advancements are being stagnated by companies trying to control the market rather than just giving people what they want. If people would just using their imaginations for a second they could understand the power of coding, programming, and automating a life that allows us to live in harmony with nature and in harmony with our own bodies' needs. Farming can be automated. People can work much less. Entire houses can be 3D printed. Long story short is that if TRUE innovation is allowed and encouraged....poverty can be automated out of existence. The Earth is filled with life sustaining water, land that grows food with or without our consent, and a sun the offers free power to everyone that is allowed to harness it. It's merely a matter of CHOOSING common good and common wealth over the wants of few.
both of her examples pointed to single mothers..and the issue was never addressed.
she pointed out about importance of educating those kids and force parents to change their mindsets
@@MaruskaStarshaya...THE PROBLEM IS THE SINGLE MOTHER BUT NO ONE IS ADDRESSING THE REAL PROBLEM!!! WOMEN MUST NOT HAVE ANY CHILDREN UNTIL THEY ARE MARRIED AND FINANCIALLY STABLE. WHEN YOU LOOK AT THE POVERTY RATES OF INDIVIDUALS IN AMERICA, THE HIGHEST RATE OF POVERTY IS WITH THE SINGLE MOTHERS!!! THIS IS A FACT!!! SO, WHY ISN'T ANYONE EXCEPT FOR ME TELLING WOMEN NOT TO HAVE ANY CHILDREN UNTIL THEY ARE MARRIED AND FINANCIALLY STABLE? IS IT THIS WAY BECAUSE WOMEN DO NOT WANT TO BE ACCOUNTABLE FOR THEIR ACTIONS AND GET ANGRY WHEN SOMEONE TELLS THEM TO BE? PLEASE REPLY WITH HONEST FEEDBACK!
Where are the father's? Why are they not being held financially accountable? She wants more money,change jobs. BTW it's not Jackie's fault she's poor it's her mother's choice. And by default her non existent dad's. Third wave feminism and welfare are the biggest ones at fault.
@@jamesperry2052 so... what you're saying is that poor people and single mothers shouldn't have kids?
@@too.much.finance.8429 Yes.
How to be rich faster
Be single
Be antisocial
Be independent
Be a workaholic
Finish school
Get a degree
And ignore all of your constant psychological traumas and disorders due to your desperate need of succeeding
And that's pretty much it.
Now go and make some money my friend. Best of luck.
TheSimsCovers how can you Finnish school when you don't even have what to eat ?
*It's not about money, it's about finding ur passion and money is a result, you give meaning to life or other will for u !!!*
So true! But you forgot to mention; Go out and make lots of money so you can pay a shitload of taxes so that the woman who made this video can redistribute your money to the poor people which is really codename for people with a low IQ.
Marc Stephan Nkouly You don't have enough to eat because you wasted time being in the statetheist brainwashing camps they call school instead of doing real work, learning real skills.
Schools keep people unskilled and useless, and deluded into entitlement mentality. And it gets people deep into debt.
Now if only making a lot of money equated with happiness
poverty will never end, ive seen ppl purposely live out on the streets even tho they clearly knowingly had good options to get off the street. some was crazy......however some sane.
yes, at some point the streets will end at the city limits and then you must take care of yourself
It's the 'Give a fish or teach to fish' parable with the added difficulty of changing the culture to a fishing culture. Admirable...
give them and Universal income and no real education
Lmfao
I was born into poverty but when I was growing up I was always ahead of the class still am still when she said that studies show impoverished kids fall behind without a statistic like 2 in 4 or 3 in 4 because not all poor kids are behind I was ahead, and so was my little brother, but that was mostly because our mom taught us her college work at very young ages. so to that statement here is a short story on how that isn't always the case, and most if not all my friends are poor but lot's are very smart and either average or higher.
Thanks, Teva....I never dreamed it was so easy to eliminate the bad choices that certain percentages of human have always made. That was a smaller problem before the do gooders with the worship of government programs started trying to eliminate poverty by throwing other people's money at it. You will always get more of the behavior you reward. Individual responsibility is the only program that is tried and true. Capitalism is not perfect but has done more for the human condition than any other man made system. Your educated naivete is impressive indeed and I'm sure in your own mind you will succeed in your endeavors.
Good choices are easier when you are rich which is why the "certain percentage of human" who make good choices generally align with the percentage that are not poor. But when you are poor, good choices are harder and less accessible. We may never eliminate the human nature that urges us to make bad choices but we have a responsibility to make good choices more accessible for everyone. If making a bad choice bars some people from having good choices available, then there is no point in asking individuals to take responsibility because what are they gonna choose but bad choices? And why should making good choices available for all be so far fetched when talking to someone across a two year timeline is not far fetched?
Amen sister! I agree, but we also need job security besides a decent living wage. We also need affordable housing.
'We need more money in the system but we also need lower prices'.
What we really need is more people reading economics
@@juliantheapostate8295 just Reading alone is a challenge for many , also with new commers to each nation the language barrier is very difficult, with translaters on these phones could help i would believe. but Language and communication plus economics would be top two , just had an idea the Constituiton of america should drop few off the list and put as example the second amendment " the right to economics" and "Learn Latin or Greek or what ever is your nations Language" Peace...
Some people believe in the just world theory, hard to debate a belief.
Ferrando Davis: that's also called "blame the victim."
According to the Brookings Institute, if you do these three things, you won't remain poor. 1.) Graduate high school. 2.) Get a job. 3.) Wait on children until after your married. Less than 2% of children from poor families that do these three things are poor as adults.
You dont need a job if the government give you money each month, millenial thinking
Education is higher in the US than ever before. More aid money is spent than ever before. Yet poverty increases. Poverty is not about resources, it's a state of mind. As long as we teach people it's not their fault and that it's some one else's problem, you undermine the rest of what you teach. You can't teach self sufficiency skills without teaching self sufficiency mindset - which is personal responsibility.
That's not blaming people for being poverty. All kinds of things can happen that we don't plan for through no control of our own. But that's all the more reason why we need to take control of that which we can.
Not to be callous, but frankly, Jackie's problem was not the government failed her, but her mother and those teaching her. She was not taught to think of the consequences of her actions. She made selfish choices with no concern for the consequence. To her, the warm, comfortable shelter was always an option - a safety net so that she didn't have to be responsible. Of course I have no idea of the details of that case specifically, but as presented, she was more likely to be back than not.
That doesn't mean the government and public shouldn't help people, but the mindset has to change for the cycle to change.
You're wrong. You missed the whole point.
@@JB-vb6dh Says you. I got the point. I just contend that it is flawed and ignores the root causes.
“Of course I have no idea of the details of the case specifically, but . . “ - Your words. You don’t know, but you give this long comment. Just listen.
@@JB-vb6dh - If you bothered to read my comment, only a small part of it was dedicated to the case of Jackie. I did listen. Did you? It's possible that jackie was married or in a committed relationship and became widowed right away, rr that she was financially well off but through some natural disaster or unexpected event lost everything, but if that happened, don't you think the speaker would have shared that? She shared that a young woman, which a child old enough that she was likely still a child when she was born, was back in the shelter obviously making choices that brought her back. In the speakers words, she suggested te very thing when describing why jackie's coming back was a problem.
Maybe you should read for understanding before commenting? Just a thought.
Summary: A long-winding emotional charade which revolves around having a strong goal - to end poverty - without any explicit steps or empirical data to back that up.
Yeah. She said that McDonalds worker should be paid a living wage. She would’ve been laid off if workers at fast food restaurants were paid living wages. The education thing I agree with though. But public spending has increased in the educations system but no real results. Wasted money.
Wanna end poverty. Drop regulations in businesses, lower taxes and cut useless spending,
well, the speaker gets their own poverty ended by political means via the academia community that is totally on the dole of the taxpayers and a major contributor to poverty instead away from poverty...see, i can be long winded too!
We need to start looking at all work as important, anyone who works deserves a living wage. Fast food workers shouldn't be considered lower than anyone. What could be more important than feeding our families? Anyone who works and provides a service to society should be treated with the dignity they rightfully deserve and compensated fairly. People shouldn't be judged by what they do, but by the fact they they contribute to the well being of everyone by working if they are able. We have waged war on the poor for far too long, have created a class system that shouldn't exist if we call ourselves a democracy.
Of course all work is important, the real question is: "how many people can and are willing to do the same job for a cheaper price?"
I thought this was the heart of the free market. Although flipping burgers is important, this job goes to the lowest bidder and there are a LOT of bidders because it is a relatively unskilled job. The free market will always incentivise ones who are more capable and penalise those who aren't.
Rather than compensating burger flippers 'fairly', it is more important to include in their employment packages paths to progress. That includes learning new skills and making appropriate connections. Only then can they maintain a competitive edge and sustain themselves in this economy.
Burger flippers need to ask their employers not for a raise, but for more opportunities. That to me is far more important than a raise. I can tolerate poverty as long as I know there is a prospect and hope for a better future. But if your employer was determined to keep you enslaved in that minimum wage job, you either need to really love flipping burgers or you need to start looking for a better job.
Suzy Elgin fast food shouldn't exactly be "feeding families", as fast food should be a sometimes food, like ice cream.
this is wrong. why should every work deserve a living wage? the price reflects value of a certain type of work.
if flippnig burgers, lets say, costs 15$ per hour but only produces 12$ surplus value, it have to subsidised,which means that you have to make the burgers more expensive.
so again, no more the living wage,as prices rise.
not every job is equally important,thats why judges arent payed as bad as someone who flips burgers. price is always a measure for the inherent value.
Yet McDonalds sells sandwiches for over $7
Explain that!
Actually, I think the mindset, system and pressure for nearly everyone be required to work in order to make a living is one of biggest reasons for poverty.
In an industrialized nation people have the potential to output far more than they consume. And increases in efficiency requires fewer and fewer people to distribute these goods and services to the public. This means that there is an ever increasing proportion of people that are not really required to contribute in order to sustain the economy, but because they still need to acquire money in order to make ends meet they must find ways to siphon wealth out of the system. This results in a bloated service sector that provides low wages, inefficient and low value work.
Rather than having those people in poverty scramble for these jobs and scrape together money in order to get by, it would likely be better to just provide for them in exchange for some light community and cultural involvement and responsibility. By halting the endless cycle of continually needing to scramble for money in exchange for fulfilling some public or personal responsibilities, these people may be able to genuinely pursue personal improvement and help towards bettering society.
this woman is amazing and this deserves way more views
Jamie Wilson
*"inquisition of pawn de serve application"*
_\| GARDENING ::: F00D × BUSYNESS |/_
Nope
JVW
she lacks energy though
I understand why.... because as a people
we don't give everybody equal chance at success
I and many others have work diligently a gotten little in the form of success.
she didn't have any solutions, or didn't you notice?
She had one solution, which was concerted effort towards community improvement and involvement, along with additional education opportunities. What she was lacking was any high level system changes that could effectively or potentially remedy the systemic issues.
We need to get these people Grooving. Spending some time surrendering to The One Groove & contributing to the global community's energy. Groovism is our belief system. "Be with The One" , an achievable, instinctive, therapy!!
The real issue that everyone misses is that the middle class is not even making enough money to save! That is what she is saying. We live in a system that punishes people who save.
Well, let me back track a little... What people should have been doing was whenever you have a little extra money, put in a mutual fund. That way the money is still circulating.
However, people stopped investing. So, circulation heavily slowed. Causing high taxes and inflation. Now the middle class has fallen behind inflation and now the money is not as powerful as it should be. The middle class has not received a raise in over a decade as everything else is getting more expensive. Now the middle class has no money to save nor invest...
The three best ways to Overcome poverty: 1) Family planning, 2) family planning, and 3) family planning. No one should have any child until he or she is in a stable financial situation.
if that were happening then you would have no neighbors and maybe you would'nt even exist yourself
hey, here's the wrap :- I don't work for money, I work only for myself, but my work produces no income. Am I a bludger because I was born disabled? I work, but need support in order to achieve some kind of decent life. What I don't get is that poverty could be stopped entirely with just a few strokes of a pen. Trouble is, our politicians are the true bludgers. They start and fight wars instead of committing to a world where there is less deliberate killing. Remember, soldiers are paid murderers. That's it. My rant.
Do you have family? Do they care about you? Do you care about people who have cancer? Or about old and alone people? You guys always think only about yourselves and blame others for doing the same.
Malthusian positive check on population
Murder is a crime. Soldiers are not commiting crimes as they are doing what society asks of them. They are more like heros and you owe your existence to them but thats my rant.
So our soldiers are murders?......... wow I guess you dont like the freedoms you have.
@@MrKongatthegates ya those allied murdered poor nazis, they should be tried for war crimes
I admire the work described here. And I agree with almost everything she’s said. But here’s why we as a nation will always have appallingly high poverty: Because as a nation, we don’t care. I’ve heard the rhetorical question ‘How can the wealthiest nation on the planet have 20% of its children live in poverty?’ raised many times. And it should be raised over and over again because this fact is shameful. It’s when you talk about state and federal government that it breaks down. Why? The answer lies in our history. Look at how we have become the wealthiest country on Earth. It’s not through compassion or through wanting to take on poverty head on. Not a few national initiatives have tried and failed. Poverty in this country can only really be addressed at the local level, one block at a time. The US is too cruel a country to allow for any other way.
What you see as cruelty others see as reality; and what you decide is charity others will derive as cruelty. European nations, despite having better systems for the lower classes, are all extremely dependent upon the US to do so. What you wish, and how it will be achieved, is a solution that may well damn more people than it saves. It's the idealistic that tend to commit mass genocide, after all.
Stephen Jenkins true but that ‘reality ‘ does not make it justifiable. The US is a cruel country. Again if you look at history, we endure cycles of extreme depression in pursuit of this appallingly high inequality (wealth and social mobility). On your point about other countries, I think it’s time we stop thinking ‘either-or’, either Che communista or robber barren capitalist. Look at for example the platform of Andrew Yang.
One of my life goals is that if tokenization could create a
livable good retirement ecosystem for retirees and
disabled , retired people,
I would be happy to see it implemented by any company.
2 parents, hard work, survival. Hard work pays off, always has, always will...
"stop being born poor, growing up poor and ending up poor."
perfectly said
Haha
easier said than done...but said so poorfectly i can hardly stand it
😂😂😂
All those failed poor persons. We must bla bla bla bla.
Did she just compare poverty in the U.S. to China?! A human is **objectively** and **physically** better off being poor in the west than being in the middle class in China. And then she slams charities by saying they aren't "serious". What a mindless and heartless tool. TED needs to find an actual expert on this issue.
In my city, they put low income housing in nice areas with better schools.
I hope that they are keeping an eye on these properties, and not let the residents destroy and degrade them. Must be a nice city !
In my city, the people in the nicest schools redistricted in such a way so as to make sure that demographic changes prevented any low income people from being in elementary schools with their children.
Was there any change in school rating , achievement test scores and the like? Not being snarky, genuinely curious.
@@spike.strat1318 You are not being snarky. That is a perfectly reasonable thing to consider.
you have a city? how nice, i want a city too! can i illegally immigrate to your city or would you call that an invasion?
The speaker is correct. ACEs study indicates the severe damage of poverty on children under the age of five.. Look also at the wage gap, about 84% male to female at this time, a change of about 20 cents per hour since I was 20. It's even worse for Spanish and African American women. I am now 72 and my wage is still not comparable to what a man makes in my profession. I have over 20 years experience in my 25 years working as a therapist.
I read a couple of years ago of the uphill battle of an organization trying to get subsidized housing in a neighborhood. It took five years to get the community to agree. Her ideas are spot on. Brilliant idea! I wish five years later that this was common across the U.S.
I forgot to add two other important issues, racism and domestic violence. A community such as this would be a built-in support network for the women and their children.
So why catch up ? Don’t take this wrong. Being in a country should guarantee every citizen a certain quality of life in regards to basic needs.