You could’ve saved the first 3 minute intro - excruciatingly terse!!! Secondarily - why use third party applications for presets, when capture one itself supports them just fine? What is the unique selling points if dehance? Seems like capture one does all of this already
I like to be thorough when talking about products, it isn't for everyone though, thank you for your feedback. As for your question, Dehancer's strength is in its replication of a vast number of film stocks and their properties while also giving precise control to manipulate the properties with both darkroom and digital-styled tools, taking it beyond just a preset or a LUT. It certainly doesn't work for everyone's workflow, but it is an interesting tool to me, because of the care put into recreating film looks beyond standard color contrast.
My experience with SilverEfex is very limited/out dated (I think I had version 2?), so not the best judge for that, but I think Dehancer has more fine control and customization opportunity than the SilverEfex tools I've used in the past. I am on windows only so I don't have Apple M ARM compatibility information beyond their system requirements linked below, for specific questions about that I'd reach out to them and ask as they are very responsive! blog.dehancer.com/system-requirements/adobe-photoshop-lightroom-classic-capture-one-affinity-plugin-for-macos/
@@TrentonHoshikoCinematography seems like dehancer has taken more care to make it work complementary to the other tools - Silver Efex seems to have made its integration with DXO a priority 1 thus down prioritising the other tools. Their pricepoints are equal - i think i will give dehancer a shot
They have a free trial on their site, and one thing I really like about Dehancer's licenses is that you can get them in different time increments to try out for a longer period of time, without having a constant subscription or making a larger purchase. I agree that it works as more of a complementary tool to what I already use in my photo workflow. I hope you find the toolset useful!
You could’ve saved the first 3 minute intro - excruciatingly terse!!! Secondarily - why use third party applications for presets, when capture one itself supports them just fine? What is the unique selling points if dehance? Seems like capture one does all of this already
I like to be thorough when talking about products, it isn't for everyone though, thank you for your feedback. As for your question, Dehancer's strength is in its replication of a vast number of film stocks and their properties while also giving precise control to manipulate the properties with both darkroom and digital-styled tools, taking it beyond just a preset or a LUT. It certainly doesn't work for everyone's workflow, but it is an interesting tool to me, because of the care put into recreating film looks beyond standard color contrast.
@@TrentonHoshikoCinematography better/worse/equal to silverefex? How about optimisation for the Apple M ARM processors?
My experience with SilverEfex is very limited/out dated (I think I had version 2?), so not the best judge for that, but I think Dehancer has more fine control and customization opportunity than the SilverEfex tools I've used in the past. I am on windows only so I don't have Apple M ARM compatibility information beyond their system requirements linked below, for specific questions about that I'd reach out to them and ask as they are very responsive! blog.dehancer.com/system-requirements/adobe-photoshop-lightroom-classic-capture-one-affinity-plugin-for-macos/
@@TrentonHoshikoCinematography seems like dehancer has taken more care to make it work complementary to the other tools - Silver Efex seems to have made its integration with DXO a priority 1 thus down prioritising the other tools. Their pricepoints are equal - i think i will give dehancer a shot
They have a free trial on their site, and one thing I really like about Dehancer's licenses is that you can get them in different time increments to try out for a longer period of time, without having a constant subscription or making a larger purchase. I agree that it works as more of a complementary tool to what I already use in my photo workflow. I hope you find the toolset useful!