Let me guess 7? That’s so disappointing why not give it a 6 I loved the main games faction side quests so if this is not as great then it should be a 6 or whatever a disappointing rating is
Every time you take a ship you invariably take several weapons, at least a suit or two, maybe some contraband, some resources from the hold & several thousand credits. The (admittedly ridiculous) registration fee before selling was clearly a way to balance things out. I clean a ship out then undock & destroy it now.
Smh the media hates xbox. This game is still generational because it does things no other game does!!!! IGN is full of it!!!! It doesn't stop me from playing the game and it doesn't stop xbox from making money!!!!!!!
@@nipnop7995you’ve bought into the hate train lol the consensus on the expansion is generally that it’s good but too short, making 7 a reasonable score.
@@stympt1nag I’m glad I’m seeing someone else mention this, I haven’t seen anyone make a stink about it before but it has always bothered me. They seem to have been enamored by this too strong duo-tone look since Fallout 76 (maybe a little in Fallout 4) but yeah it just looks like an old sort of washed out Instagram filter. I don’t know why they’re against having nice dark and rich blacks and are obsessed with this look. It looks cheap.
04:15 never required to leave.....this is the problem. Bethesda listened to the wrong audience. They had a massive galaxy to explore and because everyone shrugged it as a departure from their roots, they did this. That was the whole point! Don't pretend like you even apprecited "their roots" of massive explorable POI's when you've long since been "meh"-ing the other dlcs from fallout and elder scrolls all along.
Screw the engine, it'll do. The problem for me personally is - 1) They still can't make legs and a shadow in the first person.. 2) There is no dismemberment in the game Bethesda??? How? How could you miss this moment, when torn off legs and arms could float in gravity.. There are no corpses in space.. How beautifully could you show blood in the form of bubbles flying in zero gravity??? 3) Shooting and grenades inside the ship in space - well, this is rofl, at least some kind of limitation should have been made.. 4) Why make repeating events?? And with such a rigid frequency?? It would be better to have empty space than to constantly stumble upon singers, rhinestones, this scientist granny with a joke - why the hell?? 5) There is always an abandoned place on the planets.. Always.. All the planets were unsuccessfully colonized.. Sometimes you come across a civilian post, one has to save his own, another has to kill bandits, the third has to get resources - repeat.. Why?? It would be better to have a completely uninhabited planet with its own flora and fauna - everything, than to generate the same thing endlessly.. 6) You can't remove gear from NPCs - I also don't understand what the problem is?? How could you make a new game worse in mechanics than the previous one??
remember when Starfield was supposed to be the next game of the generation? the new Skyrim that everyone will be praising for months if not years after its release? remember how everyone forgot about starfield a month after release...
There are so many different ways to play starfield that you will never run out of fun. Try creating a new character that is a space pirate or game developer that makes mid tier games, you will be amazed out what you can come up with. There is so much more to do then the main mission. Try creating a character that clashes with your personality and you are now faced with a completely new game with exciting missions. There are so many layers to starfield that you will find things that you didnt know were possible.
The game is an 8 for me, enough of good stuff to play... the worst part is the "1000" planets that have the same instantiated buildings repeated on 500 of them. The expansion is good.
Bro why does everyone hate on this game so much it's actually pretty fun like space fallout yea it's not as ambitious as advertised but it's a fun time overall definitely not nearly as bad as some modern games like for spoken or star wars outlaw
because fun is subjective. And a lot of people who have played previous Bethesda games are just not impressed anymore. They aren't really evolving their games since Oblivion. It's the same thing since 2006 bro.
Horrid writing and boring quests. Lack of Andrea incorporated to the DLC. And disappointing city design Bethesda giving the usual "the city got half-destroyed" excuse so they can cover up their inadequate Creation Engine being unable to render full cities
As someone who has finished the main campaign with Andreja as my choice companion because she was the most interesting and fun one, I still can say that the 7 score that IGN gave the main game is a perfect score (even after the patches).
I bashed this game when it came out loved it for a few months, but it just got very repetitive with empty planets and the same quests all the powers were cool and building my ship was one of the best things! Never picked the game back up after beating it 4 times for the cool armour and I won't be getting the dlc just doesn't offer anything new and that car to travel planets should of been in from the start, Elder scrolls 6 plz don't follow this path but let us have hope in Bethesda : D
It's just bots, just like Mr. Beast, Dream, Penguinz0, a lot of channels and SM accounts use bots to boost followers and views because it manipulates the algorithm in their favor, and the appearance of many people caring about something can naturally attract people to care about it as well.
Do you guys think there are any game reviewers left with any self respect? Do you think these people actually go home, kiss their loved ones and think ‘wow I did an important thing today?’ Are they just tired, apathetic or are they just grinding out every day because the industry is inflated and nothing matters?
facts. This is just getting old. The audience acts like they aren't responsible for IGN being put in a box to not rate anything too highly or anything too harshly. @@marinebymistake
This is going to sound insane, but IGN should just straight-up ban the number 7 as a review score. Or better yet just get rid of scores altogether. It's gotten to the point where a 7 doesn't really mean anything at all, because everything is a 7. Okay, so it apparently means "good". The problem is that I've played Starfield and already know that "good" is the LAST word I'd use to describe it.
@@matthewdanahy9411 Well, the majority of game critics don't really do proper critique. Look at the conditions they review games under, for example. They are nowhere near the conditions that the player plays the game under. That's bad critique right off the bat. I've seen dozens of reviews that go like "10 hours in, and I'm excited to see what else this game has in store." And it's like, no. That's not a review. The most noticeable problem with game critics is that they grade every game on a curve. That's why every game that isn't amazing or terrible gets a 7. But the 7 is meaningless, because most games that receive that score are simply bad games. Period. That's the problem with grading on a curve, the average loses all meaning, and encompasses too large a quality gap. A 7 could legitimately be a good game. But more often than not, it's a bad game like Starfield. Critics are too afraid to take off those couple extra points that they really should. Instead electing a "Well there's SOME fun to be had, therefore the millions of problems the game has aren't a factor." mentality. But no. Starfield, reviewed by a critic actually gauging the objective qualities and missteps of that game should not be given a 7. That's just not an objective score when the game's flaws, and the audience's likely perception of the game are taken into account the way a review is meant to. Yeah, a lot of critics gave it a 7. The Bethesda name on the title screen bumped it up 2 more points than it deserved. But I'd wager that the majority of players who played the game wouldn't consider it "good". Because I've heard of more people giving up on it out of boredom and frustration than making it to New Game +, by a longshot. Yet somehow the reviews don't reflect that reality, thus they are bad reviews.
Starfield isn’t a terrible game lol. Not the most fun experience, but def not terrible. I could dump hours into this game and find joy in it. The mods go crazy already and just imagine future mods. There’s a lot of room for continued content
@@TheChivalrousChickenTender I am straight-up tired of people using the mere existence of mods to let developers off the hook. It's like, no. I don't care what anyone says, mods don't actually count in favor of a game. They have no bearing over whether or not a game is good, because they're not ACTUALLY a part of the game. They're extra. They're alterations. They don't count. Can I mod a game if I want? Yeah. But what does that have to do with Bethesda, or really even Starfield? They aren't entitled to a modding community, yet they and their fans behave as though mods are a FEATURE of their games. That's not how this is supposed to work. I'm sorry, but even giving Starfield a 7 feels like people are giving it more credit than it deserves. I've literally seen developers do way more with way less.
I get that starfield wasn’t all it was made out to be. With that being said, it’s not that bad of a game. It’s not great but it’s no slop like these comments would have you believe. It ain’t game of the year but it’s not at all the worst game from last year.
I lasted about 5 minutes into the planet part. Met a counselor that looked like a cartoon 18yr old, in a backdrop where any sense of realism was out the window was told I had to to make an oath of allegiance to a great serpent...strike three. I deleted it. What a disappointing waste of promised delivery. I've been a real fan of starfield up until now. Poorly executed.
This deserved lower than a 7 it was immensely disappointing. Stop being cowards have some integrity for once if you're going to continue doing the review formula instead of before you buys.
4:30 - or you could land your ship on Bessel 3b and sleep for 1h in your ship! 🙂 Anyway, 7 is a bit harsh. Starfield as a whole is an 8-8.5, while the DLC itself adds a 0.5 to it.
Alrighty then, I'll be civil and respectful. You, sirs, have completely forgotten how to be fair with your reviews. This was a clear 2 to 3. You just don't want to anger your overlord.
Terrible writing. Felt like cut content they wanted to save for a cash grab later. Not worth the price tag. They are showing more and more that they have no intentions of living up to the potential this game has.
![Noob To Max With DRAGON REWORK In Blox Fruits [FULL MOVIE]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/LnBMOinoOvA/mqdefault.jpg)
You already know the score.
@@Ukulele-expert100/10 like aways with IGN
So a 7????
a 7…. seems like a trend lately 😟
Let me guess 7? That’s so disappointing why not give it a 6 I loved the main games faction side quests so if this is not as great then it should be a 6 or whatever a disappointing rating is
Literally saved me time thank u 😂ign still sucks
Honestly this expansion felt like a Glorified Patch which Bethesda sold for 30$. I'm extremely worried for The Elder Scrolls 6 hope it's not this bad.
@@muzamilnabinadroo is elder scrolls 6 already announced? When does it come out?
@@LedHead_ there's a teaser they released in 2018. They have started to work on the game since Starfield shipped.
@@muzamilnabinadroo no way thanks for the info!
Im only glad they finally have people who work on driving mechanic.
Fallout 5 will have vehicles t drive.
Finally
@@MelbourneArchviz How about A PATCH BUT A BAD ONE.
the space "sim" where you can make more money selling 10 space suits rather than one ship.
@@mattsmokes2505 lmao why is this so true
To be fair spacesuits are fucking expensive in real life
Every time you take a ship you invariably take several weapons, at least a suit or two, maybe some contraband, some resources from the hold & several thousand credits.
The (admittedly ridiculous) registration fee before selling was clearly a way to balance things out.
I clean a ship out then undock & destroy it now.
It's not a space sim
so it is 4/10 if it wasn't big publisher?
Basically, yes. This "expansion" is clearly just a faction questline scraped from the original launch.
@@diariodefoto god of war 3/10
I rate this game a 7 out of 7. 😃
GAME OF THE GENERATION they said
"ONE OF THE MOST IMPORTANT RPGS EVER MADE" they said😂😂😂😂😂
Smh the media hates xbox. This game is still generational because it does things no other game does!!!! IGN is full of it!!!! It doesn't stop me from playing the game and it doesn't stop xbox from making money!!!!!!!
1,000 PLANETS WITH UNIQUE EXPERIENCES they said 😂
@@1234-y8z starfield is all but generational/innovative
Todd Howard magnum opus they said 😂
@@1234-y8zWhatever you say, kiddo. Microsoft doesn’t know what they’re doing.
Another 7, what a shocker!
Its a bad game at least it got that 😂
Nothing new from IGN
you kids crying about 7 is so god damn annoying
what do you expect from a review? if they give a game 6 or 8 you will cry that it's not 7 anyway
Another nitwit who doesn't understand bell curves complaining about a 7, what a shocker.
They literally give 90% of games a 7
How can you give this slop a 7? it's a 3 at worst 4 at best.
You never played it.
-5
@@Joseph-wh5ofstop throwing out that lazy response. The game is terrible. A 3 is way too generous.
@nipnop7995 Good thing you're not the million dollar company making reviews
@@nipnop7995you’ve bought into the hate train lol the consensus on the expansion is generally that it’s good but too short, making 7 a reasonable score.
Forgot this game existed.
😂
Damm, even Samurai Jack is mad about toad howard new gaslight-type-game.
😂
Lucky.
That's weird, it's been all over the internet this year. Especially the haters releasing lots of content
This guy found running around an empty planet 'refeshing'
The DLC is hand crafted so not empty. It still isn't very good though...
@@toshtao1 One part is hand crafted,environment and terrain around including object placement is still procedural.
Well the new package isn´t that empty, I think you refer to the "1000" planets that have generated stuff, and they are not that good.
If you've ever played it, you know it's fun. that " barren" planets have something amusing to them.
the colour filter in this game is so bad
Washed out look is crap
@@stympt1nag I’m glad I’m seeing someone else mention this, I haven’t seen anyone make a stink about it before but it has always bothered me. They seem to have been enamored by this too strong duo-tone look since Fallout 76 (maybe a little in Fallout 4) but yeah it just looks like an old sort of washed out Instagram filter. I don’t know why they’re against having nice dark and rich blacks and are obsessed with this look. It looks cheap.
They gave it a 7 9:13
Should be a 4 max.
Saved me 9 minutes of my life. Thank you.
1
It is a 5 at best
the base game would be a generous 5 or a fair 4 the DLC is a generous 2!
According to Steam, it's a 3/10
@@spartan_a1176 on a 10 scale, isn't 5 standard?
Yall wild it def isn’t below a 4 😂 yall salty. Should be a 6 max though
Nahh 8 from me!
04:15 never required to leave.....this is the problem. Bethesda listened to the wrong audience. They had a massive galaxy to explore and because everyone shrugged it as a departure from their roots, they did this. That was the whole point! Don't pretend like you even apprecited "their roots" of massive explorable POI's when you've long since been "meh"-ing the other dlcs from fallout and elder scrolls all along.
Game is trash
Agreed 😅
Its sooo uninteresting its kinda impressive
@@Rezm0ni 😁
Still, you forgot the still
Ur mom😊
Screw the engine, it'll do. The problem for me personally is -
1) They still can't make legs and a shadow in the first person..
2) There is no dismemberment in the game Bethesda??? How? How could you miss this moment, when torn off legs and arms could float in gravity.. There are no corpses in space.. How beautifully could you show blood in the form of bubbles flying in zero gravity???
3) Shooting and grenades inside the ship in space - well, this is rofl, at least some kind of limitation should have been made..
4) Why make repeating events?? And with such a rigid frequency?? It would be better to have empty space than to constantly stumble upon singers, rhinestones, this scientist granny with a joke - why the hell??
5) There is always an abandoned place on the planets.. Always.. All the planets were unsuccessfully colonized.. Sometimes you come across a civilian post, one has to save his own, another has to kill bandits, the third has to get resources - repeat.. Why?? It would be better to have a completely uninhabited planet with its own flora and fauna - everything, than to generate the same thing endlessly..
6) You can't remove gear from NPCs - I also don't understand what the problem is?? How could you make a new game worse in mechanics than the previous one??
remember when Starfield was supposed to be the next game of the generation? the new Skyrim that everyone will be praising for months if not years after its release?
remember how everyone forgot about starfield a month after release...
They gave it a 7.
Ofc
Your spoiler ass bro lol
It’s IGN
There are so many different ways to play starfield that you will never run out of fun. Try creating a new character that is a space pirate or game developer that makes mid tier games, you will be amazed out what you can come up with. There is so much more to do then the main mission. Try creating a character that clashes with your personality and you are now faced with a completely new game with exciting missions. There are so many layers to starfield that you will find things that you didnt know were possible.
The game is an 8 for me, enough of good stuff to play... the worst part is the "1000" planets that have the same instantiated buildings repeated on 500 of them. The expansion is good.
We've all played it enough to know that's just not true. I wish it was, but it's not.
Will never forget Fraud Howard calling this a “dream game” more like a nightmare
HIS dream game, yes. The problem is that his ’dream game’ is mediocre.
They chose to make this game instead of Elder Scrolls 6...
@@artv.9989 why do you think es6 will be any different/better? 😂
It was wayyy funnier what he said about Fallout 76 when it was announced.
@@skyriminspace Because Elder Scrolls 6 will be hand crafted and not have procedural generation. It also has better lore than Starfield.
Just to save y'all some time, IGN rated this a 7.
because nothing apart from the score matters, right, got that
@marinebymistake you're so butthurt man lol you're replying to every comment lol face it this game sucks
They gave Alien Isolation a 5.9 but this a 7, let that sink in hard for a long moment...........
Bet you haven't even played it
Alien Isolation sucks. It's boring if you're not into the alien Franchise and movies
This game is 8 for me, sure it has weaknesses, but it is not as bad as people want to project. I am happy I bought it!
Bro why does everyone hate on this game so much it's actually pretty fun like space fallout yea it's not as ambitious as advertised but it's a fun time overall definitely not nearly as bad as some modern games like for spoken or star wars outlaw
because fun is subjective. And a lot of people who have played previous Bethesda games are just not impressed anymore. They aren't really evolving their games since Oblivion. It's the same thing since 2006 bro.
Because people don't like liars
Horrid writing and boring quests. Lack of Andrea incorporated to the DLC. And disappointing city design Bethesda giving the usual "the city got half-destroyed" excuse so they can cover up their inadequate Creation Engine being unable to render full cities
Because it's not on PlayStation
@@KingDerek58 i’m sorry you also called people incels for criticizing the game? Are you just a tier 10 bootlicker or a troll? I’m genuinely curious.
I don't know how the Skyrim accents were so endearing and the space Russian accents are so grating but here we are
6:40 I cant believe how bad that visual effect is, something id expect from a mod not an official dlc
Let me guess 7?
you kids crying about 7 is so god damn annoying
what do you expect from a review? if they give a game 6 or 8 you will cry that it's not 7 anyway
@@marinebymistake We would cry if it was an 8 for sure, given that it's genuinely terrible. But a 6? That seems fair, even if a little high.
And you guys crying about us crying about IGN giving a mediocre game a predictable rating is also annoying.
7 out of 7. 😃
As someone who has finished the main campaign with Andreja as my choice companion because she was the most interesting and fun one, I still can say that the 7 score that IGN gave the main game is a perfect score (even after the patches).
Kinda goofy that he said enemies are bullet sponges and then one shoted a guy
What the hell did the reviewer do during his play through to make Sarah say she doesn't know what disgusts her more, the player or the Va'ruun???
I'm just mad that Varun doesn't have any Varun weapons or armor for sale
I personally would’ve preferred an “Operation Anchorage” style dlc that lets you experience the war between UC and the fake sheriff criminals
IGNs credibility left long ago
@nnaheim. I think this one was not a bad review 7/10 seems honest
@@BPMa14n sadly, it isn't
Just to remind you they gave to Doom 2016 7/10 too
Ign need therapy
stop pretending you've played this DLC
@@leedsalex the reviews in steam are overwhelmingly negative and they for sure did buy the dlc
@@leedsalex Bro enjoys mid games 💀💀💀
@@ziggos9810 “bro” isn’t just a sheep that follows the herd, actually plays the games and gives them a fair chance.
@@leedsalex so you enjoy half baked meals too?
I bashed this game when it came out loved it for a few months, but it just got very repetitive with empty planets and the same quests all the powers were cool and building my ship was one of the best things! Never picked the game back up after beating it 4 times for the cool armour and I won't be getting the dlc just doesn't offer anything new and that car to travel planets should of been in from the start, Elder scrolls 6 plz don't follow this path but let us have hope in Bethesda : D
So its basically 2.5 out of 10 right? I mean if your scale starts with 7 and goes to 10.
Give us all the spoilers? check !
This channel has 18.5 million subscribers? Why? :)))
It's just bots, just like Mr. Beast, Dream, Penguinz0, a lot of channels and SM accounts use bots to boost followers and views because it manipulates the algorithm in their favor, and the appearance of many people caring about something can naturally attract people to care about it as well.
Do you guys think there are any game reviewers left with any self respect? Do you think these people actually go home, kiss their loved ones and think ‘wow I did an important thing today?’ Are they just tired, apathetic or are they just grinding out every day because the industry is inflated and nothing matters?
Isnt it free with xbox ultimate?
I was gonna buy it but idk I'm pretty sure it says it's free with xbox ultimate.
I think the only thing i would say is that the zealots are the bad guys not the whole faction.
If they gave it a 7, u know it’s a 5 or lower
On a 1 to 10 rating scale isn't 5 standard?
I would give it an 8!
30 bucks is a joke for this....5 bucks at most
Its the standard ign number 7
you kids crying about 7 is so god damn annoying
what do you expect from a review? if they give a game 6 or 8 you will cry that it's not 7 anyway
@@marinebymistake cool story now go cry somewhere else 😂
@@abdulhaseeb9164 It's amazing how many people don't understand how averages work.
Its a 5 honestly
The 7 at the end is the number of people who bought it? or is it the score?
How is this a 7?
69 - 62 = quick maffs
@@christianflex4all oh makes sense now
My guess is that because they gave the base game a 7 so they're afraid to look inconsistent by giving this DLC a lower score
The bug montage at the end was cool to see in an IGN review
The fact that there’s a “Chunks” there is silly. And no one recognizes Andreja!?
I’m telling myself now ! Do not buy elder scrolls 6… Todd knows how to get the people going and that’s about it anymore.
Its 7, its not bad but not great, its just good/ playable
The likes to views ratio on this video has been the only positive thing ive experienced with Starfield
This dlc is not even deserving of the 1 score.
Why review the game if you don’t have all the achievements?
Redownloaded, opened it up started it, did the ritual, immediately turned it off and haven’t touched it since
As soon as they release mods immediately installed a fix for those temples
this should be a 5 at most going by what the reviewer says.
a 7 means a very good game with much more positives then negatives.
Do you guys think IGN now delays their reviews to see when it's safe to give a 7?
Probably, wouldn't surprise me if that's how they play it safe.
In space know one can hear you say:
The games looks pretty good, I've had lotsa fun so far with the base game and the expansion is good.
2:45 What we do in the shadowsssss
2 X 2 = 7
you kids crying about 7 is so god damn annoying
what do you expect from a review? if they give a game 6 or 8 you will cry that it's not 7 anyway
facts. This is just getting old. The audience acts like they aren't responsible for IGN being put in a box to not rate anything too highly or anything too harshly.
@@marinebymistake
@@marinebymistakeYou're you're NOT out of touch. It's the kids that are wrong.
7 is THE ULTIMATE SCORE!!! 🥹
This is going to sound insane, but IGN should just straight-up ban the number 7 as a review score. Or better yet just get rid of scores altogether.
It's gotten to the point where a 7 doesn't really mean anything at all, because everything is a 7. Okay, so it apparently means "good". The problem is that I've played Starfield and already know that "good" is the LAST word I'd use to describe it.
It means it was good in this reviewer's opinion.
It's ok to not all have the same opinion.
@skyriminspace ok but all the reviewers have the same opinion. It being a 7
@@matthewdanahy9411 Well, the majority of game critics don't really do proper critique. Look at the conditions they review games under, for example. They are nowhere near the conditions that the player plays the game under. That's bad critique right off the bat.
I've seen dozens of reviews that go like "10 hours in, and I'm excited to see what else this game has in store." And it's like, no. That's not a review.
The most noticeable problem with game critics is that they grade every game on a curve. That's why every game that isn't amazing or terrible gets a 7. But the 7 is meaningless, because most games that receive that score are simply bad games. Period. That's the problem with grading on a curve, the average loses all meaning, and encompasses too large a quality gap.
A 7 could legitimately be a good game. But more often than not, it's a bad game like Starfield. Critics are too afraid to take off those couple extra points that they really should. Instead electing a "Well there's SOME fun to be had, therefore the millions of problems the game has aren't a factor." mentality.
But no. Starfield, reviewed by a critic actually gauging the objective qualities and missteps of that game should not be given a 7. That's just not an objective score when the game's flaws, and the audience's likely perception of the game are taken into account the way a review is meant to.
Yeah, a lot of critics gave it a 7. The Bethesda name on the title screen bumped it up 2 more points than it deserved. But I'd wager that the majority of players who played the game wouldn't consider it "good". Because I've heard of more people giving up on it out of boredom and frustration than making it to New Game +, by a longshot. Yet somehow the reviews don't reflect that reality, thus they are bad reviews.
Starfield isn’t a terrible game lol. Not the most fun experience, but def not terrible. I could dump hours into this game and find joy in it. The mods go crazy already and just imagine future mods. There’s a lot of room for continued content
@@TheChivalrousChickenTender I am straight-up tired of people using the mere existence of mods to let developers off the hook.
It's like, no. I don't care what anyone says, mods don't actually count in favor of a game. They have no bearing over whether or not a game is good, because they're not ACTUALLY a part of the game. They're extra. They're alterations. They don't count.
Can I mod a game if I want? Yeah. But what does that have to do with Bethesda, or really even Starfield? They aren't entitled to a modding community, yet they and their fans behave as though mods are a FEATURE of their games. That's not how this is supposed to work.
I'm sorry, but even giving Starfield a 7 feels like people are giving it more credit than it deserves. I've literally seen developers do way more with way less.
It's 7
If Bethesda really wanted to be more successful they would pool their resources into elder scrolls and give everyone what they actually wanted
AN IGN 7 IS AN EVERYWHERE ELSE 4 MAKE NO MISTAKE
"Not uninteresting?" Shut up and take my money!
Bethesda can release a literal turd, and it is still rated 7/10 by IGN.
Yall took mighty long to give this DLC a review 🤔
Gamers can't handle opinions that are not their own.
Most of the gamers are uneducated brats, no womder
I get that starfield wasn’t all it was made out to be. With that being said, it’s not that bad of a game. It’s not great but it’s no slop like these comments would have you believe. It ain’t game of the year but it’s not at all the worst game from last year.
I lasted about 5 minutes into the planet part. Met a counselor that looked like a cartoon 18yr old, in a backdrop where any sense of realism was out the window was told I had to to make an oath of allegiance to a great serpent...strike three. I deleted it. What a disappointing waste of promised delivery. I've been a real fan of starfield up until now. Poorly executed.
AI voice?
Yeah tell me about it 😂
Sevenfield: Severed Space is a solid seven out of seven.
Starfield haters, assemble
HAHA!!! 😂😂
@@Teeyall lol fr!!!
Base price of the game is too high for what it offers.
Don't buy it then.
Yeah $15 max is all starfield is worth. The ship builder is fun but everything else is pretty boring.
@@anakinskywalker4596 then wait until it's on sale.
oof bethesda is just not doing well lately
This deserved lower than a 7 it was immensely disappointing. Stop being cowards have some integrity for once if you're going to continue doing the review formula instead of before you buys.
shut up you didn't even play it.
@@coffee7180Just because someone doesn't agree with your opinion that doesn't automatically mean they didn't play it kiddo.
Why does ign exist at this point.
Stopped playing this expansion after 1hr. They really improved nothing - and they lots to improve! Can’t believe this is from Bethesda tbh
Come on now. Is it 7?
You could have had the son return to the family and the stay heir.
4:30 - or you could land your ship on Bessel 3b and sleep for 1h in your ship! 🙂 Anyway, 7 is a bit harsh. Starfield as a whole is an 8-8.5, while the DLC itself adds a 0.5 to it.
Diversity? Check
Transgenders? Check
Piles of money from developers? Check
1 out 10 becomes 7 out of 10!
At best they are completely out of touch, at worst a bunch of sell-outs
Love your comment and love your avatar. (‾◡◝)
WHY DO THEY LIE? JUST SAY IT ASSS
Let me guess... 7?
let me guess, 7 out of 10?
Starfield NPCs have some unusual eyes.Veyr creepy when they are looking at you 😱😱😱
Alrighty then, I'll be civil and respectful. You, sirs, have completely forgotten how to be fair with your reviews. This was a clear 2 to 3. You just don't want to anger your overlord.
I’m enjoying it so far
I'm just here to see if they gave it a 7/10
Edit: yup, of course they did 🤣
Let me guess… you gave it a 7
9:13 Score - 7 .
You could take a shit on the ground and ign would somehow muster a 7/10 for it
Look, a 7.
Bold.
(Dear IGN, can you please grow some balls?)
Terrible writing. Felt like cut content they wanted to save for a cash grab later. Not worth the price tag. They are showing more and more that they have no intentions of living up to the potential this game has.
Tencent be looking at IGN's 7/10
"It's free real estate"
Honestly starfiled isn’t that bad to me.
It's not people just love to hate
Millions would agree, but they played it unlike the hivemind that plague the RUclips comment section.
I'm at 499 hours logged and going to crack 500 after lunch ;p.
@@alfgart cap
@@alfgart do you even know what bad is.
This games seriously pretty good tbh lol
Another 7, man this channel has gotten good at bootlickin.
A 7!? This is a solid 5.
Starfield: Shattered Dreams
Good review.