Not true, just some shots with the f1 car being destroyed were shot with the canon. They used the camera just because it was cheap compared to the rest of the equipment.
@@mrLabear dang I'm glad yall told me the truth. Folks will have you thinking literally any camera can look like the professional cinema ones. Francis Ha looks good but nowhere near as good as movies in black in white from old Hollywood on old film cameras.
Your final statement really makes the point… If you’ve invested in cinema gear (primarily low end), it’s likely your gear is already ‘good enough’. The advances over the last 10 years or so have been astronomical. The problem people have is just knowing how to use them; proper lighting and operation. Which of course is not particularly easy and requires a lot of experience.
Matti Haapoja does a great interview with Oren about how they used it! I think they used 10 different configurations of the camera to be able to switch for each shots need very quickly. Very cool to see that because it was so cheap on the scale of cine cameras, that they decided to just get ten and build each one to different use case.
Yes, they used a 75% an fx3 to film the movie but in one interview the director made a confession that they used an fX6 and an fx9 to film the most important part of the movie. That's why I never gonna change my fx6, Is a pretty great camera. Sony is a winner always.
Fx3 user here, honestly what I found most impressive is that most of it was done on a mirrorless camera that most of us own, it could’ve been a canon, fujifilm etc mirrorless camera for all I care.
I was very surprised this movie didn't do better. I loved it. But $80m movie and to date has only done $104m in global sales. I thought it was a great movie though and as a sony shooter and a FX3 owner it was at the top of my list of movies to see this year
Not really. It lacks the color science of the Sony cameras particularly the $80,000 Sony Venice. With the entry level FX3 you can get relatively close. Not with a Canon camera. No way. By the, way most my cameras are Canon.
99% of the look comes from lighting and not the camera body. The right lighting and any camera looks good
Now this is going to blow up in the next 20 like the Canon 5D Mark 2 did since Iron Man was shot with it
Not true, just some shots with the f1 car being destroyed were shot with the canon. They used the camera just because it was cheap compared to the rest of the equipment.
That’s false information. However, Frances Ha was shot entirely with a Canon 5D ii
@@mrLabear dang I'm glad yall told me the truth. Folks will have you thinking literally any camera can look like the professional cinema ones. Francis Ha looks good but nowhere near as good as movies in black in white from old Hollywood on old film cameras.
Surely a $80M budget mostly for post production doesn’t have anything to do with the final quality 😅
Your final statement really makes the point… If you’ve invested in cinema gear (primarily low end), it’s likely your gear is already ‘good enough’. The advances over the last 10 years or so have been astronomical. The problem people have is just knowing how to use them; proper lighting and operation. Which of course is not particularly easy and requires a lot of experience.
Matti Haapoja does a great interview with Oren about how they used it! I think they used 10 different configurations of the camera to be able to switch for each shots need very quickly. Very cool to see that because it was so cheap on the scale of cine cameras, that they decided to just get ten and build each one to different use case.
Yes, they used a 75% an fx3 to film the movie but in one interview the director made a confession that they used an fX6 and an fx9 to film the most important part of the movie. That's why I never gonna change my fx6, Is a pretty great camera. Sony is a winner always.
Fx3 user here, honestly what I found most impressive is that most of it was done on a mirrorless camera that most of us own, it could’ve been a canon, fujifilm etc mirrorless camera for all I care.
Why are you calling it an IMAX film when you're saying it's shot on Sony which is not IMAX.
Sony fx 30 vs lumex bs1h compilation
Now we just need the $80M USD
😂
Interesting that they went with the FX3 and not FX6. Some of the FX6 functions would really help on a large production.
You got a good point
I was very surprised this movie didn't do better. I loved it. But $80m movie and to date has only done $104m in global sales. I thought it was a great movie though and as a sony shooter and a FX3 owner it was at the top of my list of movies to see this year
That goes to show as long as your tools are quality then thats what matters the most
You forgot to mention the $80k cooke lenses
>it has really good color science
SonyGreen™
Everybody knows, grandpa
It's not correct. It was a fx6 plus plenty of other gear plus plenty of staff plus plenty of knowledge
It's bout Who n How u use it .. ;)
IMAX movie filmed on something else than imax cameras?
Doesn’t sound right to me 😂😅
Homie’s hat tells us he’s a frequent self lover. But his mustache and earring scream it at us. ❤
Movie name ?
The Creators
😂😂😂
Canon r7 better)
Not really. It lacks the color science of the Sony cameras particularly the $80,000 Sony Venice. With the entry level FX3 you can get relatively close. Not with a Canon camera. No way. By the, way most my cameras are Canon.