Ancient Architecture part 1
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 7 июл 2022
- An introductory video about the sharp disparity of ancient architectural construction styles seen in Egypt, the first in a series that will point out similar disparities at megalithic sites around the globe...and some conclusions that can be drawn from this evidence.
Развлечения
I feel as though it is true that something globally bad happened which nearly knocked humankind back into the stone age. Some groups that survived had the knowledge to do the best that they could with what was left. I do hope that one day more light is shed on our ancient past as it really does seem something is missing from what we are told.
That something is called Christianity and Islam. We need to chase these scumbags out of academia since all there findings an research have to fit in a 6000 year old world view of the universe! They have no business in Archeology history or science!
Islam won’t allow this … regrettable islam is gaining influence. Plus the out of African hypothesis won’t entertain anything that puts Black Africans in a second light
Tony you have a good understanding of what really happened in the past which is restored the demise of Atlantis 🧜♂️
It did knock them back into the Stone Age. They all had to start all over from the very beginning, some , 13000 years ago
Here is the answer you've been looking for:
"What is it, don Juan?" I asked.
"I can (energetically) see fleeting black shadows all over the place."
"Ah, that's the universe at large," he said, "incommensurable, nonlinear, outside the realm of syntax. The shamans (and rishis of old India) of ancient Mexico were the first ones to see those fleeting shadows, so they followed them around. They saw them as you're seeing them, and they saw them as ENERGY THAT FLOWS IN THE UNIVERSE. And they did discover something TRANSCENDENTAL."
"What did they discover, don Juan?" I asked.
"They discovered that we have a companion for life," he said, as clearly as he could.
We have A PREDATOR THAT CAME FROM THE DEPTHS OF COSMOS and took over the rule of our lives. Human beings are its prisoners. The predator is our lord and master. It has rendered us docile, helpless. If we want to protest, it suppresses our protest. If we want to act independently, it demands that we don't do so. They are the ones who set up our hopes and expectations and dreams of success or failure. They have given us covetousness, greed, and cowardice. It is the predators who make us complacent, routinary, and EGOMANIACAL. In order to keep us obedient and meek and weak, the predators engaged themselves in a stupendous maneuver-stupendous, of course, from the point of view of a fighting strategist. A horrendous maneuver from the point of view of those who suffer it.
THEY GAVE US THEIR MIND! Do you hear me?
The predators give us their mind, which soon after we are born and as we grow to young children it becomes our mind. Through the mind, which, after all, is THEIR MIND, the predators inject into the lives of human beings whatever is convenient for them. By playing on our EGO BASED self-reflection, which is the only point of awareness left to us, the predators create flares of awareness that they proceed to consume in a ruthless, predatory fashion. They give us inane problems that force those flares of awareness to rise, and in this manner they keep us alive in order for them to be fed with the energetic flare of our pseudoconcerns.And they ensure, in this manner, a degree of security to act as a buffer against their fear.The predators' mind is baroque, contradictory, morose, filled with the fear of being discovered any minute now."
Book The Active Side of Infinity, chapter Mud Shadows by the writer Carlos Castaneda
ruclips.net/user/daniluchison
"complete lack of concession to human scale and human convenience" could not have been put more eloquently... I've been thinking the same thing, I've been diving down an "alternative ancient history" rabbit hole for a good while now and I've had been noticing that and thinking the same thing but never heard it put into such clear and concise sentence. Type1 and Type2... I love it! keep up the stellar work good sir
Thank you!
I think the "Ancient Egyptians" came and found everything abandoned from the "Type II" structures and claimed it theirs.
Whomever built these "Type II" structures were definitely not the Pharaoh's slaves that's for sure.
Very well done. RUclips suggested this video. I subscribed.
You made excellent points. The presentation was wonderful, compelling, interesting, and informative.
The truth is nobody has the faintest clue who built these things or how or why. The bigger question is why academia has continued the false ruse about it all.
Inertia...sloth...peer pressure...devotion to dogma...rigid adherence to what their forebears asserted.
Archeology in general and Egyptology in particular is essentially a club; those who violate the club rules are expelled.
EGO is why.
Money.
Thank you!
One of the very best documentaries thank you for preparing and sharing. Objective unbiased, non-presumptive commentary. And logical in the reasoning. Today when people are making their own videos and sharing thoughts with collaboration, the old theories from old books are looking so much less plausible. Tombs, Bronze Age tools, bulls in sarcophagus, etc.
Our history is far richer and complex than a mere 6,000 years.
So glad I found this channel. Subscribed instantly. Clear and succinct presentation, looking forward to delving into more of your videos. Thank you.
I swear 99% of the people I talk to around town think the pyramids are full of hieroglyphics and pharaoh mummies lol. So few people on earth realize the scale of this mystery. I think people would be fascinated if they knew more, and explorers and educators like yourself greatly bring this mystery to light via RUclips. Thank you and best wishes
Welcome aboard!
I can't help but think of the builders saying,"This will really mess with their heads!".
I've occasionally had exactly the same thought.
Spot On, this is one of the clues to separate 'Modern Egypt (from Dynasty Zero to present), from an Earlier Civilization - constructed by Machines alone.
WILLIE YOU ARE SOOO9 SPOT ON! IT'S THE SAME CIVILIZATION THAT C O NSTRUCTED PUMA KUNTA IN P ERU
Its not only Egypt. Such 'type 2' structures are found in Peru, Easter Island, Japan, India also.
Exactly so.
They were built by another civilisation and probably before man. The Egyptian inherited the structure’s and probably the same regarding some of Ancient Rome building!
Beautiful video! 100% agree on these (at least) two different construction styles/techniques.
Loved this video,immensly, well done and very interesting!! I am wowed!!
From what I've read from OSIRIS & THE EGYPTIAN RESURRECTION by E.A. Wallis Budge 1911 vol. 1-2, the Osirion is the well of Osiris in which offerings where dropped down into. It is said that voices could be heard within, probably the priest collecting the offerings hidden from the patrons. They should drain and dig, could be lots of gold down there in that nasty water.
I have been saying for so long that no King would build a tomb ie great Pyramids and NOT have the book of the dead gliphs carved in it!...u wouldnt go to that trouble and purposly ommit it!..
Keep up the good work by highlighting these issues!!
That is just the tip of the iceberg, but you have the jist of it. When one visits an actual tomb and then the interior of the pyramids it becomes obvious that they were made for different purposes.
Fun fact. Book of the dead didn't exist until king unas at the end of the 5th dynasty.
Maybe this king was non religious, but liked the idea of being buried in the trend of times he lived in
@@cashgrab3139 also, I think that it has been suggested that in some instances inscriptions were placed in mortuary temples built as annexes to pyramids.
WONDERFUL WORK YOUR NARRATIVE HIGH DEFINITION VIDEO & PACE MAKE YOUR CHANNEL A MUST FOR ME THANK YOU FOR YOUR WORK
The term “Stone Age” makes people think stone tools, but the real Stone Age was when an advanced civilization mastered the art of stone masonry and high technology that makes us look pathetic compared.
Profound! Yet simple observation. Looking fwd to next video.
Glad you liked it!
awesome post. I completely agree with your analysis. cheers.
Exactly.
For something that the maker would be proud of,the lack of ANY hyrogliphs is very telling.
This along with the others are all way older than we’re told.
An excellent video - so well composed and narrated! Love the categorization of the structures.
Thanks Tony.
can we apply these categories to all ancient temples and pyramids around the world? I enjoyed the video.
Maybe these sites are only able to "turn on" given the right sequence of musical notes , ie the sounds, words voices, and instruments attuned to the cubitic building pattern
Something intuitively tells me that your onto something there, I've had an Innate vague idea that feels very right that sound was involved somehow
This is older than the Egyptian , Time of the Titans and Giants
Great video, I dont buy the mainstream explanation for these clear differences in construction methods.
I don't think the passageways within the pyramid were made that size due to structural restraints or any other limitations. Anyone with the ability and technology to build the pyramids and work with stone so effortlessly would have made them of a size where physical access was easy, if that's what their intended purpose was.
What I said...
I think the golden question is, why do we have such difficulties / division with why and how these structures were erected?
@@AncientEgyptArchitecture the difficulties are because of how stubborn and insular the Egyptologists actually are. They do not want nor wish to entertain any opposition to the prevailing dogma... There is a fascinating, feature length documentary called "Revelations of the Pyramids" that had a number of different engineers and modern architects provide their opinions on how the Giza pyramids were constructed. The film even had Christopher Dunn present some fascinating information about the symmetry and precision of the stone cuts on some giant, megalithic statues that would have been impossible to construct with a copper chisel (I only learned later about Dunn's work and his "Giza as a Power Plant" hypothesis!) In this film there were also a number of Egyptologists interviewed and their explanations were simply unscientific and quite laughable (your clip about how the contradictory Stele which had been covered up by local Egyptologists is very telling) ... However, I feel the film falls short in its denouement which has a very bold and ecologically-themed message, which proposes that if there were a pre-dynastic civilization, that created this pyramid construction to come about (the Type II architecture as you detail) then the reason for their demise was due to their own mistreatment of the Earth, not unlike what is proposed to be occuring in modernity with climate change, etc. The film also has a fascinating hypothesis about the use of mortarless, polygonal construction in various disparate places throughout the Earth and how they all have some kind of specific alignment across the globe, even intersecting with the Giza Plateau, which is very interesting idea, but I'm unsure if it is accurate. I'd be very interested in hearing your thoughts about that film. Perhaps you can create and upload some kind of a "response and review" video in relation to that documentary. Even watching your multi part series on ancient architecture was incredibly interesting and it leaves me amazed and full of wonder about the (very real) possibility of the construction of the Pyramids being much much older than prevailing thought!
PS I'll try to find a link to that documentary for you, if interested.
Also, another thing that bothers me a lot, is how does Modern Egyptology reconcile the Mohs hardness of a copper tool (~3.5) and granite itself (~6.5)!!!
@@AncientEgyptArchitecture here we go
The Revelation of the Pyramids
ruclips.net/video/2fS9ixfQ_no/видео.html
Fascinating documentary, with an original style of presenting their premise, as a detective story!!
Thank you! I'll check it out.
Excellent video thank you
Why is no one commenting or noticing the vaulted chamber that has steps in it as it goes up getting smaller that is common to pyramids in Africa and South America as you can see at 5:28 in this video? There has to be some purpose to this if its replicated on mulitple continents and different cultures
Yes, why is no one noticing this? I'll be posting a clip in future on the South American/Egyptian connection.
Interesting.
I have wondered for a long time,, why is all the art in 2D when there are so many sculptures and statuettes that are extremely detailed and symetrical in Egypt. I am pretty sure that with the mathematical, architectural, and artistic skills they had when they built pyramids, they should have also figured out how to draw and paint with depth, as in 3D... It doesn't add up, they put so much effort in to everything else but the art it seems.
Almost like it was done by two different people at different times
Maybe study of egyptian art might help you
very good point. Also, if they managed to construct such an enormous structure like the great pyramid, you would assume that later on, the next generation of pyramids would be improved versions. But it seems all downhill from there on technical skills. It doesn't make sense if you take the mainstream narrative into account.
@AJ yes, like turmoil in the midst of drought and famine, civil war, periods of weak central government. Or simply variation in skill in a large society. Like medieval Europe where some people were building huge castles and then decorating them with tapestries that sometimes look like they were done as 6th grade art projects.
A very beautiful summary
Glad you liked it
Thank you
Mister, can you turn your volume up? Can barely hear this video 🥲
Is polygonal, mortarless, undecorated, Type #2 pre-dynastic?
That is my hypothesis.
Yes all those later hieroglyphs soooo gotty that pre-dynastic civilization build the pyramids in Mex I co and the Andes and of course Puma kunta
The pre Younger Dryas (before the ice melted 12,000 years ago) megalithic civilisations didn't decorate their stonework. The precision of the stone and and in some cases, it's magnetic qualities, was their art. They didn't need to scar it with inane scrawling. Later more primitive cultures, like the ancient Egyptians, Mayans etc, did that. If you are interested, look for Bryan Foerster, Graham Hancock, and Randall Carlson, they are all on YT.
The mathematics inherent in their constructions was meant to convey the essence of their purpose.
@@AncientEgyptArchitecture I love to go back and meet with them, and see their culture for myself. How their society was constructed . What were their thought processes.
I like the rollers theory. Like rollers with 20 ton blocks on them wouldn't instantly sink into the sand.
and on a hard surface wood would fracture and disintegrate.
@@JamesHawkeRUclips No it wouldn’t. They use regular wood to support hundreds of tons all the time.
Discovering your video. Well done, keep up the good work. I have watched many videos on how the pyramids and the sphinx on one side and the temples on the other do no match... But I never fully understood how as nobody before you showed clearly what was what. Could you explain or re explain please where were the mumies found? And just a constructive criticism hopefully : the fading to black transition between each picture somehow stressed me visually, I would so much prefer just pausing then going to the next photo. The slides projection style somehow was triggering eye strain. Other than that, I subscribed and looking forward to your future videos!
Mummies were as common as fleas on dogs in the 1700's...the dynastic Egyptian culture mummified anything that couldn't crawl away, reptiles, birds, hippos, crocodiles, cats, dogs, cows....you name it. After several millennia of this there were so many mummies available in Egypt that they were used to stoke the boilers of the trains instead of wood or coal, for decades.
However, it must be stressed that an original burial has never been found in a pyramid, only intrusive burials after their construction and sealing. fact. The academics claim this is because all the original mummies of pharaohs and nobles fell victim to grave robbers, and this may be an arguable point from some perspectives, but I find it odd that the grave robbers swept absolutely every last vestige away and them took the trouble to tidy up afterwards....not likely. As far as I can tell, most of the attempts at grave robbing were performed by European treasure hunters with crowbars and dynamite.
Well done 👍🌹....
Thanks 😊
Well done
From hieroglyphs it's shown the worker's in ancient Egypt were well paid and not slave's and were very skilled and everyone wanted job's working on the construction of ancient buildings,there where worker's that where for each job (stone cutters,polishing,heavy duty work etc.)well organised and they had time as well for perfection,just going off a great documentary I seen about 10years ago.
I think they were Trolling in those pictures.
Has the base of the pyramids been mapped to where they know the geology underneath it? That maybe a very revealing answer to date it closer to modern academic time periods, or to way earlier as most believe.
Modern Egyptology is like a scene from " Planet of the Apes " !!!
If you want a good example to prove that megalithic stones arent so easily moved, several thousand men tried to bring up a multi-ton block up a mountain in South America a few hundred years ago, using every bit of technology available to them which was far beyond anything the builders of sites like machu pichu had.... and not only did they fail but a few thousand people were killed in the most gruesome way imaginable as the bolder tumbled down the side....
This attempt was promulgated by the Spanish invaders who were curious as to how the Inca could possibly have built the structures they were occupying, and demanded that the Inca 'show them' how the megaliths could have been transported from quarries to building site...the demonstration ended badly for the Inca, but also showed conclusively that they had no involvement with the construction of the ancient sites that even today academia credits to them.
They were water tunnels in the pyramid, not tunnels for people to walk through. Thats what I think
Hypothesis: if there are no hieroglyphs then it was buried during the time hieroglyphs were used.
Possible, especially in the case of the Osirion. Also we know the sand covered the sphinx and the lower portions of the pyramids in the 18th century.
Its hilarious, compare to the very old photo albums like from when the sphinx was still mostly under sand and its all changed.
The interiors of the pyramids would be very easy to navigate if one were able to fly or levitate.
Imagine making your chemical pools and wave pattern enclosures for your reactor so well that people can walk in them thousands of years later and wonder where they put the spinning wheel and pooper?
LOL!
The theories they currently hold are a absolute insult to any builder’s intelligence. I am aware of the paintings on walls, but they are hilarious ancient forms of trolling.
Maybe type 1 and type 2 construction are separated in our timeline by the great flood
Are you referring to the end of the Younger-Dryas period when sea levels rose 400 feet?
the stones were obviously not sculpted but molded and the interesting thing is that the surface of the blocks was still soft when assembling it, hence the perfection in the interstices, the blocks were moved by reversing their gravity even if we can prove that with water and sand something heavy can be moved, the fact that the stones have different shapes makes the structure much more solid, the proof that it is still there now. The minimalism of certain temples shows that the building was almost solely for energetic purposes and not ceremonial.
Casting or moulding would change the crystiline structure, the inhomogeneous blocks show that they're not a form of concrete or conglomerate, they're cut and shaped somehow, I think it's wonderful in a way that we don't know, mystery gives life a flair we would not have of we knew everything
All that is pictured, all that we see, seems to represent a civilization focused more on function that form doesn't it?
the form that those builders saw in their work was that of mathematics and design as literal truth.
@@AncientEgyptArchitecture: With the preciseness of the construction and architecture, seen even now after several millennia of time, I find I cannot disagree with your thinking. It seems they saw beauty in mathematics and worked to manifest it in at least their grander structures.
In its way that's a very deep artistic, even spiritual, vision, isn't it? It leaves me to wonder at what their civilization, in its prime, must have looked like, eh?
Regards!
John~
American Net'Zen
@@AncientEgyptArchitecture Love your content. Keep it up!
I can't help but wonder about their system of writing. How did none of it survive?
Full disclosure ✌👽
ابيدوس اقدم موقع و النوع التانى كاهرم الاحمر هى الأقدم و الاهم
3:54 thas is a lions head at the right
What's in the other piramids ????
Just empty space...working on 3rd video now.
In the Egyptian wall paintings, Pharaoh always won a great victory... Ancient spin doctors.🙄
Pyramids could be examples of pre-younger dryas Cataclysm human construction
12000. This Cataclysm began the current geologic Era. The civilization that built the pyramids are from another age, the Paleolithic supposed stone age.
Da forgot to bring der pencils
When you know how to make sails, you can make sacs and thusly sac walls.
Please expand.
Didn't anyone ever think you're probably standing in the basement what's left of the building
Whether you are referring to the Valley temple or the Osirion, the horizontal beams atop the columns were what supported the roof, which was the top of the structure, so no, they are not basements.
Mortarless impenetrable joints, lack of decoration, heavy stone construction and no space for population activities indicate a waterway for substantial current flows.
I do not believe that the older 'type 2' structures were built by people who used writing. they had no need of it or had not invented it.
I’m not sure what the history is but the inside of the monuments with out step looks like what u would see if u used a endoscope and looked in a machine..
those aren’t monuments those are some kind off pump off something!
What is the stone made out off.
Granite.
My yoga guru, who was able to see into the past, said that written language began 5 thousand years ago. So I always think that structures that don't have any written language inside them could be more than 5 thousand years old. The pictograms are not the same thing as written languaage.
I absolutely agree.
May I introduce a theory?
Please do
That obviously looks like a basement to me and that's probably why there's no hieroglyphs
Could really be and those ignorant Archeologists are blind to see that🤣
I do beg to differ, there was a cartouche found in the grand pyramid by Vyse that looked like an ancient graffiti. Now who would build a 5 Billion Dollar building and paint a cheap sign within it?
Vyse did not discover that cartouche, he forged it. Study the associated literature.
@@AncientEgyptArchitecture exactly my point 😁
Ah!!
You should watch sacred geometry, decoded. Best explanation of how most of this can be explained.
Man Lifts 20 Ton Block By Hand: ruclips.net/video/E5pZ7uR6v8c/видео.html
Right!
Now if we can just get him to lift them 20 feet straight up and move them around, we'll be onto something.
@@AncientEgyptArchitecture Making and moving a gigant grindstone by hand (3-5 persons): ruclips.net/video/HtNLEYQnFRs/видео.html
normal men did not build the pyramids. this is abundantly evident.
Soft stone and copper tool: ruclips.net/video/QAo7qKpO0Uw/видео.html
Granite vs. Iron: ruclips.net/user/shorts5m298WX3IHs I now learned that there are 22 documented finds of iron in egypt dated between 5000 B.C. and the third dynasty (Cheops). Six of them were smelted. The rest meteorite iron.
Sometimes this message is hard for some people to accept as it does not sit in well with their programming.
Yet it's highly logical.
Al build in darkness yeah right
I think a smaller race people were involved here, helping as it were !
giant structure with little useless passages inside for the little folk. right.
There are no hieroglyphs because these buildings pre-date Egyptian history.
There are no hieroglyphs inside the ancient pyramids on planet Mars as well.
My question is; if the pyramids were power generation and conveyance of said power structures; what sort of devices would utilise such a technology? Could anti-gravity tech harness wireless, airborne power? It would fit my imagination but I don't know enough to theorise any sort of probability
And this is the problem that I have with the whole pyramids-as-generators theory...there were no washing machines, electric motors, stamping foundries, toaster ovens, lasers....or anything else that used electric power, except perhaps small scale electroplating processes, which could have been done with 'Bagdad batteries'.
Sound power, maybe. Electric power, no. The author J. Farrell speculates that the pyramids were not power generators but rather weapons of mass destruction, capable of wreaking destruction on sites thousands of miles away. Thin, but some facets of the story seem almost plausible.
Chris Dunn postulates that the ultimate output of the GP was a coherent Maser beam, emerging from the south shaft of the kings chamber; this would not have been to power anything terrestrial as the angle of the shaft would send any such transmission into the sky....and beyond? For communications? A signal beacon? As an asteroid defense?
Too many questions, not nearly enough answers. All I personally am certain of is that the GP, and probably the other pyramids on the Plateau as well as some others scattered around the zone of peace, were not built as tombs. That seems clear to anyone that applies critical thought to the matter. Going any further than that is pure conjecture.
@@AncientEgyptArchitecture perhaps the answer to why we haven't found whitegoods is that metallic objects would break down if the generator was setup say... 100,000 years ago... as a rough theoretical
I’ve been telling people for years! They found the pyramids. And drew on everything !!! 😂
Precisely.
They evidently were consciously afraid of defacing the structures at some level. If you regarded a structure to be of divine origin, you would not want to leave a mark that the gods could see came from you.
Correct, 2000 years ago - the Egyptian priest's and pharaoh said that the pyramids and temples (Osiris Temple) were already ancient and standing in Egypt (Cairo = Mars) when the Egyptians first landed in Egypt.
The Pyramids, temples & statues are 3D because they were built by an more ancient (pre-flood race).
Hieroglyphics are 2D because they were later added by the Egyptians.
All jokes aside . Indeed
These places were not meant as tombs ,rather for the science of the day ,yes I said it you don't have to think hard ,but it is possible
Well these buildings were made before Horus the war master (Horus was a pre-Egyptian god) rebelled against the emperor, whose death would make him the god emperor. These are pre-heresy landing sites for the space marines. But then the eye of terror expanded in the younger Dryas period and the old empire of the humans was wiped out.
I look forward to the paradigmatic dam bursting here in the next few years that will allow us to collectively realize that the Egyptians built neither the pyramids nor the Osireon nor the Abydos complex. Ur-architecture of that sort, which exists all over the world, was built by men (?) who knew their era was ending, and wanted to preserve what they could. _Hint: they weren't preserving the buildings._ There's a reason why those structures are of such odd proportions (in a non-human sense) - many were apparently designed to house machinery.
The aliens again 🙈
can you please provide a time stamp where aliens are mentioned?
It's a pity I can't show you the picture I took from your video but if you look at 1.18min frame you will see the same hieroglyphics from the Seti I's temple found in Seti I's temple in Abydos the so called helicopter hieroglyphics and submarine and other future ufo pictures , have a look between 1.16 and 1.20 you'll see it
To not a tomb it’s industrial just like the great pyramid
Egyptians never got inside the pyramids, and they sure didn't build them.
The building of the great pyramid was solved a few yrs ago by a french architect
Please elaborate? Your not suggesting that they're made from some sort of casted concrete are you ?
Lost high technology..
modern scientist are too conditioned to modern equipment and tools their brains can't grasp the idea of time and human capabilities. time and hundreds of thousands of people! that's all there is to it! in my country people still move a whole house by carrying it to another location and it's a mountainous country no tools, no equipment, on flipflops some bare feet and maybe a wooden hammer for wooden pegs! and it doesn't take a hundred people maybe 25 maybe 30 people for a house few tons in weight! pivoting through mountainous jungle with mud, thorns, trees, cobras and tall grasses that can slash flesh, through raging rivers, swamps and sharp volcanic rocks and gravels! a 2 storey piled up 10 ton monoliths on sand is hardly mind boggling to stack them on top of each other with few shaping and grinding in 10 years time?