Flight Simulator 2020 NEW Aircraft Payware | VirtualCol Beechcraft 99 Review

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 26 июн 2024
  • Enjoy my in-depth review of the VirtualCol B99, I personally don't think it's worth it at the moment (it’s rubbish) although you may disagree and if so buy it here: secure.simmarket.com/virtualc...
    Donations are also very much appreciated: www.buymeacoffee.com/pilotstudd
    Timestamps:
    0:00 Intro
    0:23 Background Of Aircraft
    1:44 Review
    7:33 Take Off Review
    9:20 Landing Review
    10:24 Final Words
    12:25 Outro

    MERCH: teespring.com/en-GB/stores/pi...
    Pilot Studd ✈️
    My Discord: / discord

    Want model planes here’s my affiliate link (it really helps me out): www.aircraftmodelstore.co.uk?aff=86
    And of course the livery mega pack, get it here: / discord

    Follow Me On Instagram @pilot.studd
    pilot.studd?igs...

    Music I Use:
    Everything You Need Is By Your Side- Vlad Gluschenko (Intro)
    INOSSI- Midnight Drive (Outro)


    Pilot Studd 2020 All Rights Reserved

    While some videos may contain flight training, these videos are not intended to be for reference or education of any kind in real-world aviation.

    Reproduction only allowed if agreed upon
  • ИгрыИгры

Комментарии • 61

  • @chuckc87
    @chuckc87 3 года назад +10

    Oh my goodness that cockpit looks like hell. Heres hoping this is a WIP... : O

    • @chuckc87
      @chuckc87 3 года назад

      Meant to say, awsome video as always m8!

  • @theflightsim2020
    @theflightsim2020 3 года назад

    Almost 5K!!!
    Good job mate!

  • @freddiemegaw495
    @freddiemegaw495 3 года назад +8

    the yoke just looks like a mobile sim

  • @pilotmattincanada
    @pilotmattincanada 3 года назад +2

    The pod is a cargo pod, the Beech 99 with 15 to 17 passengers is a little tight for room. So a few operators use the pod for extra room. It also helps with keeping the aircraft within the C of G range.

  • @pilotofthecaribbean2192
    @pilotofthecaribbean2192 3 года назад

    Great video. What about performance-wise ? does it make full use of pc components unlike other airplanes ?

  • @ethant6385
    @ethant6385 3 года назад +4

    There is also the Carenado Piper Pa44 seminole which is a twin prop analogue/ steam gauge, incase you are looking for a steam gauge twin prop that is better quality.

  • @TJ.Turner
    @TJ.Turner 2 года назад

    Have there been any updates or improvements since this review?

  • @madbager1
    @madbager1 4 месяца назад

    Definitely worth the purchase very fun plane to fly and you can change the avionics from glass to original good ground effects and easy to fly

  • @jedglover8245
    @jedglover8245 3 года назад

    Good review! Mixture levers are mislabelled and should read "fuel cutoff" as the engines are turbo props.

  • @isaxen2000
    @isaxen2000 3 года назад +2

    I like that there are more windows from the inside than the outside it must be to make it feel less closed when you travel as a passenger 👍🏻😂😂😂

    • @PilotStudd
      @PilotStudd  3 года назад +2

      😂😂😂😂 I didn’t notice that but my goodness I wondered why it looked so big

  • @cameramini7670
    @cameramini7670 3 года назад

    Do we know anything about GSX for msfs2020?

  • @pm110978
    @pm110978 3 года назад

    Cheers Boss 👍

  • @sithiradulanjithgalhenaged6974
    @sithiradulanjithgalhenaged6974 3 года назад +1

    i just purchased the just flight pa 28 and after flying around in that if feel like any GA aircraft released that is not this detailed after this is not even close to being called an acceptable addon for msfs.

  • @paulsleighty
    @paulsleighty 2 года назад

    Has this got any better, its had several updates ?

  • @Sandul666
    @Sandul666 3 года назад

    Since I can't see your face I just imagine a young Austin powers. You have a great charisma with your voice, keep up the great plane reviews

    • @PilotStudd
      @PilotStudd  3 года назад +1

      Haha! Thanks, can confirm there’s not much resemblance!

    • @Sandul666
      @Sandul666 3 года назад

      @@PilotStudd probably for the best haha

  • @mjc8281
    @mjc8281 3 года назад

    I have it myself, really disappointed early on.... the cockpit is horrid no two ways about it , however the update they put out last weekend(ver 1.5) solved the flaps issue you mentioned. I have now put maybe 25hrs into it and my long term review...... It is sluggish as hell getting off the ground(as you mention), personally with any kind of load I wouldn't attempt a takeoff on a runway under 3000ft(keep your brakes on until you are redlining the torque!). The autopilot is a little hit and miss, but workable. While sluggish getting off the ground once it gets going its seems to have plenty of power and it is relatively easy to overspeed even in a slight climb....you are looking at around 225knots as your cruise speed. Its very much not the easiest plane to slow down, personally I try to land it flatter than anything else I fly and with about 10 degrees of trim. In many ways if you think of what it must have been like to drive an late 60s full size US car, that's how this feels! (it does handle really well on the ground though). All in all I have come to enjoy mine, would I recommend it? For all its flaws it is satisfying to master, but its a plane that I would advise people to purchase with your eyes open

  • @pauljohnson9260
    @pauljohnson9260 3 года назад

    I won’t buy a plane until aerosoft’s CRJ comes out . Most don’t have refund policies so I’m not wasting money. Good review and at least your keeping it real by being honest

  • @RayKit
    @RayKit 3 года назад +1

    This is a terrible aircraft.. looks okay from outside but the inside is a joke. This is freeware material not pay ware. I paid for it and tried it. Be honest with your reviews as people will come back. Dont say everything is good. Thats not a good reviewer. but you do a GREAT JOB! keep it up! Feedback from us is always good.

    • @PilotStudd
      @PilotStudd  3 года назад

      Haha! I 100% agree, I hope it didn’t come across as too positive, it’s horrific!

  • @davidh7280
    @davidh7280 3 года назад

    Those silver coloured switches look like they've been done in MS Paint? Looks a step back from what Asobo can do.

    • @PilotStudd
      @PilotStudd  3 года назад

      Exactly David, very poor job!

  • @andrewshakespeare2691
    @andrewshakespeare2691 3 года назад

    Thanks for the vid. I was thinking of buying it. I won't now.

  • @Supremedoge155
    @Supremedoge155 3 года назад

    The planes pretty nice

  • @caribbaviator7058
    @caribbaviator7058 3 года назад

    Seriously unless Virtualcol is going to put more effort into their planes they should not be bringing their garbage to this new platform! I was going to buy it until I saw the cockpit.

  • @calebupton4023
    @calebupton4023 3 года назад

    I bought is too how do I install it ? Just drag and drop ?

    • @PilotStudd
      @PilotStudd  3 года назад

      Yep, into your community file

  • @Aerialphotovito
    @Aerialphotovito 3 года назад +1

    For pay ware , not up to something I would buy needs improvements

  • @mikewolf3264
    @mikewolf3264 3 года назад

    Thats actually a cargo pod. I work on these planes for a living.

  • @brianhamlin8139
    @brianhamlin8139 2 года назад

    It’s not a “tank”. It’s a cargo pod.

  • @daviddanser8011
    @daviddanser8011 3 года назад

    great plane, bad add on.. i would really love a similar plane for msfs but a good one.. hope Carenado does the B1900 again.

  • @Squirel
    @Squirel 3 года назад

    VirtualCol had a reputation of making frame rate friendly aircraft in FSX and you can see how they managed it. Sadly it doesn't look like anything has changed. There was lots of freeware in FSX that was of better quality than VirtualCol. Incidentally, the Beech 99 doesn't have a pilot door which explains why that door handle didn't work 🤣

    • @PilotStudd
      @PilotStudd  3 года назад +1

      Haha! that explains the non-existent door then ;)

  • @33alejan
    @33alejan 3 года назад

    Why am i getting this notification even i have no interest ablut plains??????

    • @Violins77
      @Violins77 2 года назад

      Oh, but you do have am interest. You just might not know it....Yet... ;)

  • @martytakak3605
    @martytakak3605 3 года назад

    I was really looking forward to this aircraft being released was not worth the money spent buying. It has chased me off of buying from 3rd part vendors for msfs 2020.. very disappointing

    • @PilotStudd
      @PilotStudd  3 года назад

      Don’t be put off, this is a bad example! There’s plenty of great ones coming, I’ll be the first place to go to show you what’s good and what’s like this! 😂

  • @jack.alexander99
    @jack.alexander99 3 года назад

    What a shame - I was really looking forward to this aircraft. I'm not a fan of the default King Air. Mainly because of the awful system implementation (nothing like the real AC) and also because of the glass cockpit. When I first saw the exterior model for this I was hyped, to say the least, but the cockpit it just truly appalling. I recognize it may not be easy, but it feels rushed to me. With regards to landing, you were quite a bit fast. VS0 (stall speed in a landing configuration) is 65kts. If we use the basic formula for VS0 x 1.3 we get our Vref (threshold speed; landing speed). Doing this gets 85kts. So aim on the slightly higher side of this when approaching. With regards to the flaps, I believe they are large slotted flaps, so full 40 (I think) degrees 'could' be as draggy as it is in the sim. You may need to add a fair bit of power to overcome this. Nice review mate, + 1 sub.

    • @PilotStudd
      @PilotStudd  3 года назад +1

      Hi Jack, thanks for your comment, it is sad because this could be a really good aircraft, the problem with the flaps is that it basically cuts all power and there’s nothing you can do about it, you enter a stall within seconds, if I were to deploy the earlier I’d be in the grass! It seems to be a problem that everyone experiences, sadly.

    • @jack.alexander99
      @jack.alexander99 3 года назад

      @@PilotStudd Ah right, I follow you now. In which case, as you said in your video, that’s definitely not how an aircraft should fly!

    • @mjc8281
      @mjc8281 3 года назад +1

      @@jack.alexander99 The flaps issue has been solved now, it was...... interesting to say the least before!!!!!

    • @jack.alexander99
      @jack.alexander99 3 года назад

      @@mjc8281 It will be interesting to see if textures still continued to be developed even after it's release, along side issues like this.

  • @exiletsj2570
    @exiletsj2570 3 года назад

    Apparently this developer has a reputation, for relatively low prices but low quality. This one’s definitely not for me.

    • @PilotStudd
      @PilotStudd  3 года назад +1

      Well they certainly live up to that reputation!

  • @DanBirasi
    @DanBirasi 3 года назад

    This is the worst aircraft I have ever bought. Meanwhile in version 1.82, but it is still bad. Save your money. Agreeing 100% with Studs conclusion.

  • @ShrabyaBaral
    @ShrabyaBaral 3 года назад

    15 pounds to fly a plane that looks like a freeware version for x-plane?!? yea..i'll pass.

  • @bcollinsyt2791
    @bcollinsyt2791 3 года назад

    This just looks like a port from fsx...

    • @PilotStudd
      @PilotStudd  3 года назад

      Yeah parts of defiantly are but them I’m not too sure as the flight model doesn’t have to be on legacy, so it’s either a port or pure rubbish or both!

  • @FLPV1
    @FLPV1 3 года назад +1

    VirtualCol has always done overpriced shitty models

  • @SpearHead1011
    @SpearHead1011 3 года назад

    Why would Microsoft allow this trash in their beautiful sim???

  • @w3ssu728
    @w3ssu728 3 года назад

    Horrible cockpit... Not going to buy this one😅

  • @ryanp6999
    @ryanp6999 3 года назад

    I will agree with the majority here and say this aircraft looks cheap.