@@goodereader kaleido 3 in 13.3", on open Android would be the holy grail for me. Literally received a Boox Note Max this morning, which will have to do me for some time.
If it were a 10.3" device then it would be the standard 300/150 PPI. It's that the increase in screen size results in a decrease in PPI. An Internet example of someone who tried to explain it for a Standard PC Monitor: 1920x1080 with a 21" screen is 105 PPI 1920x1080 with a 32" screen is 69 PPI
It’s the natural reality of the 13.3 segment, it’s not exactly any manufacturer’s fault. 13.3 inch eink has always lagged behind the 7 inch and 10 inch crowd for pixel density, and colored e-ink always lags further behind for the same size. Following the releases and specs of new eink devices on this channel, you can find that 300 ppi b/w came out on the smaller devices first, then to the 10.3. 13.3 kaleido 3 seems too difficult to achieve without relaxing constraints such as ppi. It’s mostly about lowering defect rates enough to be able to consistently carve a larger perfect piece of a panel out. It’s only recently that b/w 13.3 inch 300 ppi has become economically feasible enough to sell well. This similar concept also applies to the semiconductor and lcd panel industry. A lot has to do with probabilities, impurities, manufacturing tolerances, and trade-offs. As the area increases, so does the chance of a defect increase quadratically. It’s for this reason that mobile chips could be manufactured at such a low process node - they’re simpler and smaller compared to x86.
I am actually a layman in this regard but at least I know the thingy with the PPI. Now that you point it out and after I had a little more time to think about, I think that the PPI with regular carta 1200 or 1300 should be around 227 for B/W. Don't they use the Möbius tech for the screen? When I remember correctlly then it was quite resilent to bendig and had other benefits that I don't remember but the PPI Was slightly lower then Carta. When it's Möbius then it woudn't be the only device I know, the pocketbook note uses it. What can I say, the sceen matrix of my "old" device shown me the middle finger, not long ago and I had to search for a new.
![Seungmin "그렇게, 천천히, 우리(As we are)" | [Stray Kids : SKZ-PLAYER]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/kAzmhLHePqU/mqdefault.jpg)
You doing a full review ? Any way to support Google playstore?
@@simongordon8182 this unit nor samples are available for the next 30 days
We are in contact with our partners and they will send us a sample ASAP :)
can be used as external monitor? I am looking for an external portable monitor & tablet in 1. Do we have another one beside the one from Dasung?
If you jailbreak it, and install something like a screen share / screencast software, then yes you can
Is it an Android e reader?
Roll on your review!
What does that mean?
@@goodereader Sorry, just an in-depth review would be much appreciated.
@alcampbell5831 oh for sure
We should be receiving our sample soon
@@goodereader kaleido 3 in 13.3", on open Android would be the holy grail for me. Literally received a Boox Note Max this morning, which will have to do me for some time.
Oooh. I’m thinking of getting one.
The Gen 2 was our best-selling device of the past 4 years collectively
I would recommend it
If it's 103ppi in color how is it Kaleido 3? Isn't Kaleido 3 150ppi? ... looks like this is Kaleido 2 no?
It seems they can't ship to Italy
Yes we ship anywhere in the world
readmoo doesn't require Mainland chinese phone number, they require taiwan phone number, they are different region codes.
Yes you are correct, we misspoke. But either way, the fact remains that it is not North American friendly
I would like one but I'm primarelly into reading and android would be necessary, with all it's flaws.
The Fujitsu line of devices have very little flaws
Please compare with rMk paper pro-!!
Once we get the sample we will for sure
113ppi is bad
If it were a 10.3" device then it would be the standard 300/150 PPI. It's that the increase in screen size results in a decrease in PPI. An Internet example of someone who tried to explain it for a Standard PC Monitor:
1920x1080 with a 21" screen is 105 PPI
1920x1080 with a 32" screen is 69 PPI
@Gamma_Draconis they have a 10.3 as well
Correct, but they have never promoted themselves as high spec
However even like remarkable, they are incredibly high sellers
It’s the natural reality of the 13.3 segment, it’s not exactly any manufacturer’s fault. 13.3 inch eink has always lagged behind the 7 inch and 10 inch crowd for pixel density, and colored e-ink always lags further behind for the same size. Following the releases and specs of new eink devices on this channel, you can find that 300 ppi b/w came out on the smaller devices first, then to the 10.3. 13.3 kaleido 3 seems too difficult to achieve without relaxing constraints such as ppi.
It’s mostly about lowering defect rates enough to be able to consistently carve a larger perfect piece of a panel out. It’s only recently that b/w 13.3 inch 300 ppi has become economically feasible enough to sell well.
This similar concept also applies to the semiconductor and lcd panel industry. A lot has to do with probabilities, impurities, manufacturing tolerances, and trade-offs. As the area increases, so does the chance of a defect increase quadratically. It’s for this reason that mobile chips could be manufactured at such a low process node - they’re simpler and smaller compared to x86.
I am actually a layman in this regard but at least I know the thingy with the PPI. Now that you point it out and after I had a little more time to think about, I think that the PPI with regular carta 1200 or 1300 should be around 227 for B/W. Don't they use the Möbius tech for the screen? When I remember correctlly then it was quite resilent to bendig and had other benefits that I don't remember but the PPI Was slightly lower then Carta. When it's Möbius then it woudn't be the only device I know, the pocketbook note uses it. What can I say, the sceen matrix of my "old" device shown me the middle finger, not long ago and I had to search for a new.
Baruch HaShem😅
Yes