Ryan Pendzik I know. I said that I like the nano because it was really the only depiction in mainstream media at the time. Too bad it’s been fucking destroyed.
But there’s just 1 problem. Unlike Jurassic Fight Club, The National Geographic Documentary Dino Death Match that Pygmy Tyrant appeared on has yet to be released on DVD in America. Including 17 other National Geographic Documentaries that have yet to be released on DVD.
11 months later, still a very dubious genus, though the lean towards juvenile T.rex is still ever-present, given Dakotaraptor's presence as a medium sized predator, it would be difficult for Nanotyrannus to compete with both young T.rex AND Dakotaraptor for the same prey.
@@godzillakingofthemonsters5812 There have been arguments that Dakotaraptor and Acheroraptor are possibly the same thing, due to overlapping teeth and feather impressions, but nothing is set in stone yet. Edit: You have to remember we have barely any fossils of Dakotaraptor, so it is hard to say exactly what it looked like. I don't want it to be dubious as much as the next guy, but lately it's been a possibility.
We've still yet to find a fully formed nanotyrannus, yet nearly every T-rex is an adult. The most likely answer based on everything we learned is that they were the same species.
I mean, by the same logic Alioramus needs to end up as a Tarbosaurus juvenile then. Simply different growth stages from different species doesn't solidly state that the two can only be the same. This is absence of evidence, not evidence of absence. There's still plenty going against them being the same species.
Ok back up, that scene with the small pack of them being able to tire out a triceratops, bullshit, A triceratops is an extremely dangerous animal, not to mention severely aggressive, as soon as it saw just one of these buggers it would go ape shit and shake its head side to side, and swiping its horns up and down, that Nanotyranus would have had no room to strike, and if it tried it would be impaled in mere minutes, or if it did manage to bite its neck, it would be Yeeted towards the tree. Personally from the images ive seen of the "Dueling dinosaurs" fossil, it seems to look more like the triceratops was a juvenile.
00:16 is me when my friends start to try to steal my s'mores after they eat their own s'mores. If that happened to me, I would try and fight off my friends to defend my s'mores before they steal my s'mores if I had extras to spare that I didn't eat yet and my friends really wanted when they ate their s'mores then I would start fighting for them.
And that somehow necessitates me to change the name? Just a wikipedia lump? Even though Nanotyrannus has a segment of its own in the wikipedia page, and the fact that nothing has changed?
i mean this still could've happened even if they are just juvi rexes. I wouldn't be surprised if juvi rexes filled a different niche to adult rexes, its definitely an interesting idea. I.e where the juveniles were more akin to hyenas or wolves, and the adults were more like tigers and bears. But if any animal filled that niche I think dakotaraptor is more probable.
"the idea of a new smaller predator in the age of T.rex seemed impossible" WHO TF WROTE THAT, Dakotaraptor, Acheroraptor hello? The reason why we dont think Nanotyrannus us its own genus is because of little to no evidence and because it resembles a young Tyrannosaurus far too much and we dont have reason to believe that the suppposed Nanotyrannus isnt just a young Tyrannosaurus. AND OMG THEY KILLED IT. I said it once and I will say it again, anything featuring Jack Horner is gonna be absolute dissaster of logic. I never watched the documentary so I am unsure what their arguments of tiny lil "Nanotyrannus" taing down a Triceratops are but if they have some evidence of the two fighting are they seriously trying to say that "Nanotyrannus" fighting and killing a Triceratops is likelier than "Nanotyrannus" simply being killed by the giant herbivore when it got startled or soemthing in those words? bullshit
I just wonder why wouldn’t any media feature Dryptosaurus? It’s a close relative of T-rex and it did live at the same time, being about 7.5m in length and weighing close to a ton. (there’s even possibility of those two dinosaurs’ coexisting in Wyoming, according to the remains found in Lance Formation.)
So how close to being valid is Nanotyrannus today? Do we have more conclusive evidence of it being valid now, or is it pretty much just a young T. rex now?
All the conclusive evidence is yet to get studied. But given debates I've taken part in, there's apparently a lot of information regarding Nanotyrannus and its relation with Tyrannosaurus which makes its validity likelier.
King Rexy So that’s Torosaurus confirmed valid, Stygimoloch *SEEMINGLY* confirmed valid and Nanotyrannus *POSSIBLY* being valid. And how about such species as Dracorex, Epanterias and Saurophaganax?
@@awesomeproductions7755 Saurophaganax is still valid as its own thingy albeit iffy, Dracorex is almost certainly a Pachy, and Epanterias I'm not so sure.
Having another predator the size of an already successful predator to exist might spark some challenges. As Dakota Raptor probably would have competed directly. I personally think it's a juvenile Trex or a juvenile of another species from info I have gathered in past.
Based on current evidence, it's likely distinct and no. Dakotaraptor wouldn't fill up its niche. You already have something like the Nemegt formation where there's Adasaurus, Alioramus and Tarbosaurus living together. In fact having Nanotyrannus and Dakotaraptor in the same environment would make actual sense.
@@matthiasfloren2610 I believe you're asking me for a paper that argues for nanotyrannus being distinct? In which case, not literally every paper is made for every subject. You haven't even heard me out. You have a pretty wrong idea there.
Yes the Nanotyrannis is currently invalid although apparently the "dueling dinosaurs" skeleton (not to be confused with the one with the velociraptor and protoceratops) might have some evidence in the debate even though that nail was pinned down when Jane was discovered.
Its a great design... but... just a baby rex. BUT! I wonder if juvenile t-rexes may have partaken in pack hunting behaviour like juvenile male lions and cheetahs. Siblings often stick together and hunt together for a time in modern predators, so such behaviour from t-rexes from the same clutch of eggs may not be so unlikely. Thats just a hypothesis i came up with now, probs wrong
Seeing how the more social predators need to teach their young how to hunt, then if we assume Tyrannosaurus to be a social predator then yes, the juveniles would need to learn how to hunt, hence partaking in pack hunts. Also, nay, not a baby rex at the moment.
@@jacobcamacho5452 dubious, same as always. Could be its own species, could be a juvie rex. There are certain unpublished specimens that can settle the debate but the catch is that they are all in private hands.
I think everyone is so worried about if Nanotyrannus is simply a juvenile T-rex or not that I want to change the subject. If Nanotyrannus was let's say it's own Genus, what niche would it fill out? We know that Dakotaraptor existed in the same area as T-rex, Triceratops and Ankylosaurus. I wouldn't be surprised if Nanotyrannus decided to stray away to avoid competition with the Raptor and possibly T-Rex as well but that's just me. Very much so I actually loved this design of Nanotyrannus.
I doubt that nano would even need to compete with Dakota. And seeing how you have something like Alioramus in a similar formation coexisting with a large tyrannosaur... You also have some campanian formations like DPF where there's an Albertosaurine coexisting with a tyrannosaurine. Now granted that that's during the edmontonian faunal stage, I think it is possible to observe it in something lancian.
Surgeon Sergio yes the teeth go tyrannosaurs are built to pierce flesh sure they can pierce a sauropod so easily but a ceratopsian probably acted like 4-5 bites in the same area and the triceratops would be getting its wounds and bleeding
@@Melanosuchusss I think you misunderstood what I was trying to say, so let's imagine the nanotyranno has teeth about 2 inches long and the thickness of a trike's hid is 3 inches, so you can see the nano's teeth would not be able to reach the flesh beneath the trike's hide and if it can't reach it, then the trike would not take any damage(no bleeding, no nothing) it would basically amount to the trike getting scratched a bit.
For a long time I always thought that it was real but now it’s just a juvenile and I gave up but maybe someday someone can find the real tyrannosaur and call it nannotyrannus
Er, it's neither real (although it is likely to be so) nor a Tyrannosaur juvenile. That's kind of just a hypothesis. Also if you're suggesting that a new tyrannosaur species be found and named Nanotyrannus, then no, that's not how it works and would go against the rules of naming the animals.
@@awesomeproductions7755 bit hard to explain so I'll try to put it down simply 1- fossils were found 2- fossils were named Brontosaurus excelsus 3- fossils called Brontosaurus had been deemed synonymous with Apatosaurus. 4- fast forward a few decades, Brontosaurus fossils called Apatosaurus were studied again 5- said fossils showed that the original Brontosaurus fossils are indeed not Apatosaurus synonyms. So basically, no new sauropod was just randomly named Brontosaurus, the Brontosaurus that has been made valid now is the same Brontosaurus as the original, it's just been split back into its own genus. Basically just imagine if Carnotaurus was found to be a synonym of Majungasaurus, and later found to be different, then it would be called Carnotaurus again. You wouldn't create a brand new genus called Carnotaurus.
It is, but after comparing the skulls of Mary with Jane, I'm convinced that they're the same species so I have labelled it as Nanotyrannus just as how the show and the scientists studying Mary have as well.
@@user-qr2yr4ni4x oof I just reread your comment. I did a goof. But yeah my point was supposed to be that looking at similar formations, a second large predator can certainly co-exist with our large predatory lad.
Tbh alioramus and dakotaraptor can't really be called large predators in their respective ecosystems.They seem to have been medium-sized mesopredators similar to the coyote and gray wolf in north america.This specialization towards a different niche would have allowed them to avoid direct competition with the larger apex predators of their regions.
It's been proven they wasn't nanotyannus they where young t rexes nanotyannus doesn't exist this was film before they found out it there whee young t rexes
Offense to your mind about strategy learning battlefield begins and you can’t lose you Remember what suspected the listing was about and the great thing happened Speed change lava code master plan to install new strategy fossil fuel and revenge Remember your name on the real truth snuggle now and your other one has changed
![Quetzalcoatlus Challenging Tyrannosaurus [Prehistoric Planet]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/zWGnlAQsRaE/mqdefault.jpg)
![Quetzalcoatlus Challenging Tyrannosaurus [Prehistoric Planet]](/img/tr.png)
"For decades a tea hidden in the shadows"
That hits harder than Will Smith slapping Chris Rock.
I absolutely love this Nanotyrannus design and the model.
I do agree with you Land Before Time 75,Even if the fossil remains may think that Nanotyrannus isn't a new kind of tyrannosaur
Tongeria Thompson, Agreed.
its not like its a baby T.rex right?
The only thing I liked about Jurassic Fight Club has officially been out done.
Dr Bright jfc sucks
Ryan Pendzik I know. I said that I like the nano because it was really the only depiction in mainstream media at the time. Too bad it’s been fucking destroyed.
But there’s just 1 problem. Unlike Jurassic Fight Club, The National Geographic Documentary Dino Death Match that Pygmy Tyrant appeared on has yet to be released on DVD in America. Including 17 other National Geographic Documentaries that have yet to be released on DVD.
Supersonic Nanotyrannus at 2:10-2:11
LOL
He is my favourite nano
Nanotyrannus, one of the most dubious genus of theropod dinosaurs ever
@Dino Boi allosaurus aint dubious-
Other than troodon.
I think I prefer this design over the Jurassic Fight Club one.
Juvenile Tyrannosaurid: is found
Paleontologist, every time: "Is this a new species?"
For real, yes!!!
@@NoversalStudios It hasn,t been confirmed yet . The way its going its looking like its a juvenile Trex
Damn, that boy have feathers.
11 months later, still a very dubious genus, though the lean towards juvenile T.rex is still ever-present, given Dakotaraptor's presence as a medium sized predator, it would be difficult for Nanotyrannus to compete with both young T.rex AND Dakotaraptor for the same prey.
Dakotaraptor is potentially dubious as well, turns out it may have actually been part of a.. turtle.
@@FoundedScreenLady The feather impression then?
@@godzillakingofthemonsters5812 There have been arguments that Dakotaraptor and Acheroraptor are possibly the same thing, due to overlapping teeth and feather impressions, but nothing is set in stone yet.
Edit: You have to remember we have barely any fossils of Dakotaraptor, so it is hard to say exactly what it looked like. I don't want it to be dubious as much as the next guy, but lately it's been a possibility.
The designs in here are as scientifically accurate as hell. This is truly what tyrannosaurs of North America look like.
the designs looks like its from the isle
Nanotyrannus would have been one of the most fearsome predatory dinosaurs in the hell creek formation
We've still yet to find a fully formed nanotyrannus, yet nearly every T-rex is an adult. The most likely answer based on everything we learned is that they were the same species.
I mean, by the same logic Alioramus needs to end up as a Tarbosaurus juvenile then. Simply different growth stages from different species doesn't solidly state that the two can only be the same.
This is absence of evidence, not evidence of absence.
There's still plenty going against them being the same species.
2:18 its jaw just broke
Don’t be so sure about it, 2:29 The prey has been weakened by the loss of blood by the wide gaping jaws that punctuated its Hyde.
Ok back up, that scene with the small pack of them being able to tire out a triceratops, bullshit, A triceratops is an extremely dangerous animal, not to mention severely aggressive, as soon as it saw just one of these buggers it would go ape shit and shake its head side to side, and swiping its horns up and down, that Nanotyranus would have had no room to strike, and if it tried it would be impaled in mere minutes, or if it did manage to bite its neck, it would be Yeeted towards the tree.
Personally from the images ive seen of the "Dueling dinosaurs" fossil, it seems to look more like the triceratops was a juvenile.
Mesozoic Scar it's actually theorized the ceratopsian from the dueling dinosaurs specimen is it's own genus separate from Triceratops.
A juvie rex versus a juvie trike. The fued seems to be age old in these two famous animals.
Might've been better if it was dakotaraptor(When was this filmed?)
I remember seeing it between 2011-2015. But I might be wrong.
00:16 is me when my friends start to try to steal my s'mores after they eat their own s'mores. If that happened to me, I would try and fight off my friends to defend my s'mores before they steal my s'mores if I had extras to spare that I didn't eat yet and my friends really wanted when they ate their s'mores then I would start fighting for them.
Might want to change the name cause the Nanotyrannus article on Wikipedia is merged into the T-Rex article
And that somehow necessitates me to change the name? Just a wikipedia lump? Even though Nanotyrannus has a segment of its own in the wikipedia page, and the fact that nothing has changed?
i mean this still could've happened even if they are just juvi rexes. I wouldn't be surprised if juvi rexes filled a different niche to adult rexes, its definitely an interesting idea. I.e where the juveniles were more akin to hyenas or wolves, and the adults were more like tigers and bears. But if any animal filled that niche I think dakotaraptor is more probable.
The model is accurate, and detailed, but the movements of the creatures look so weird.
"the idea of a new smaller predator in the age of T.rex seemed impossible" WHO TF WROTE THAT, Dakotaraptor, Acheroraptor hello? The reason why we dont think Nanotyrannus us its own genus is because of little to no evidence and because it resembles a young Tyrannosaurus far too much and we dont have reason to believe that the suppposed Nanotyrannus isnt just a young Tyrannosaurus. AND OMG THEY KILLED IT. I said it once and I will say it again, anything featuring Jack Horner is gonna be absolute dissaster of logic. I never watched the documentary so I am unsure what their arguments of tiny lil "Nanotyrannus" taing down a Triceratops are but if they have some evidence of the two fighting are they seriously trying to say that "Nanotyrannus" fighting and killing a Triceratops is likelier than "Nanotyrannus" simply being killed by the giant herbivore when it got startled or soemthing in those words? bullshit
Nanotyrannus Dubiosus (Invalidus. Originaly but Thanks to RaptorBlack i've Changed it!)
The Gaming Nerd! No nanotyrannus dubiousus
Nanotyrannus the clever pest
I just wonder why wouldn’t any media feature Dryptosaurus? It’s a close relative of T-rex and it did live at the same time, being about 7.5m in length and weighing close to a ton. (there’s even possibility of those two dinosaurs’ coexisting in Wyoming, according to the remains found in Lance Formation.)
Nanotyrannus is not a new species, but a juvenile T-Rex.
So how close to being valid is Nanotyrannus today? Do we have more conclusive evidence of it being valid now, or is it pretty much just a young T. rex now?
All the conclusive evidence is yet to get studied. But given debates I've taken part in, there's apparently a lot of information regarding Nanotyrannus and its relation with Tyrannosaurus which makes its validity likelier.
King Rexy
So that’s Torosaurus confirmed valid, Stygimoloch *SEEMINGLY* confirmed valid and Nanotyrannus *POSSIBLY* being valid. And how about such species as Dracorex, Epanterias and Saurophaganax?
@@awesomeproductions7755 Saurophaganax is still valid as its own thingy albeit iffy, Dracorex is almost certainly a Pachy, and Epanterias I'm not so sure.
Having another predator the size of an already successful predator to exist might spark some challenges.
As Dakota Raptor probably would have competed directly.
I personally think it's a juvenile Trex or a juvenile of another species from info I have gathered in past.
@@awesomeproductions7755 don't know much on the situation of Saurophaganx or Epanterias to have a say in it.
Nanotyrannus might very well have been the Hyenas of the Cretaceous.
Interesting video 🙂👍
Perfect designs, but I think nanotyrannus was a juvenile Tyrannosaurus
Nyctosaurus
congratulations; you are right.
Nice juvenile T. rex design tbh
How ever someday someone will find a unknown tyrannosaur and then someone will call it the real nannotyrannus
If Nanotyrannus is truly a valid taxon.
Still dubious, I'm guessing
Yep
New paper shows that all the nanotyrannus specimens known are immature
I always thought Nanotyrannus was invalid
It's dubious
King Rexy valid ish now
The genus is more likely a juvenile Tyrannosaurus rex and the niche of a small predator was filled by dakotaraptor
Based on current evidence, it's likely distinct and no. Dakotaraptor wouldn't fill up its niche. You already have something like the Nemegt formation where there's Adasaurus, Alioramus and Tarbosaurus living together.
In fact having Nanotyrannus and Dakotaraptor in the same environment would make actual sense.
@@riamus7258 interesting to hear where did you find that paper
@@matthiasfloren2610 paper? I didn't mention any.
@@riamus7258 no paper=no evidence
Paleontologist's always make a scientific paper about those things
@@matthiasfloren2610 I believe you're asking me for a paper that argues for nanotyrannus being distinct? In which case, not literally every paper is made for every subject.
You haven't even heard me out.
You have a pretty wrong idea there.
"HA! You are not real!"
whoa new evolution small theropod
To make it completely accurate, it just needs lips
So,cool
Idk, I think Nanotyrannus is still rejected. But who knows.
Yes the Nanotyrannis is currently invalid although apparently the "dueling dinosaurs" skeleton (not to be confused with the one with the velociraptor and protoceratops) might have some evidence in the debate even though that nail was pinned down when Jane was discovered.
I actually like this documentary.
A way to get to the full documentary?
Juvenile Tyrannosaurus
Nano.T possible juvenile tyrannosaur
For now, I believe nanotyrannus is real
Actually, nannotyrannus is a juvenile Tyrannosaurus
Its a great design... but... just a baby rex. BUT! I wonder if juvenile t-rexes may have partaken in pack hunting behaviour like juvenile male lions and cheetahs. Siblings often stick together and hunt together for a time in modern predators, so such behaviour from t-rexes from the same clutch of eggs may not be so unlikely. Thats just a hypothesis i came up with now, probs wrong
Seeing how the more social predators need to teach their young how to hunt, then if we assume Tyrannosaurus to be a social predator then yes, the juveniles would need to learn how to hunt, hence partaking in pack hunts.
Also, nay, not a baby rex at the moment.
@@riamus7258 indeed
Isn't there a theory that nanotyrannus is a young t rex
Yes
Whats the status right now
@@jacobcamacho5452 dubious, same as always. Could be its own species, could be a juvie rex. There are certain unpublished specimens that can settle the debate but the catch is that they are all in private hands.
@@riamus7258 who knows
Yes
I thought you don't believe Nannotyrannus existed?
They look pretty acurrate.
I think everyone is so worried about if Nanotyrannus is simply a juvenile T-rex or not that I want to change the subject.
If Nanotyrannus was let's say it's own Genus, what niche would it fill out? We know that Dakotaraptor existed in the same area as T-rex, Triceratops and Ankylosaurus. I wouldn't be surprised if Nanotyrannus decided to stray away to avoid competition with the Raptor and possibly T-Rex as well but that's just me.
Very much so I actually loved this design of Nanotyrannus.
I doubt that nano would even need to compete with Dakota. And seeing how you have something like Alioramus in a similar formation coexisting with a large tyrannosaur...
You also have some campanian formations like DPF where there's an Albertosaurine coexisting with a tyrannosaurine. Now granted that that's during the edmontonian faunal stage, I think it is possible to observe it in something lancian.
Achillobator and Alectrosaurus coexisted with each other in Mongolia some 85 mya, and both were roughly the same size
@@WildWorld81 that as well.
I heard Zuchengtyrannus share a formation with Tarbosaurus. And Sigilmassasaurus with Spinosaurus (though i do doubt about it being real).
@@dirandrous7682 no, zucheng and tarbo are from completely different formations.
How the hell did it kill that trike just by nibbling its sides?
in theory it would die but it would take hours maybe even days
@@VaranusZhukof117 Can the nanotyranuus even pierce the trike's thick scaly hide? The teeth looks relatively small.
@@surgeonsergio6839 i wouldn't think they can
Surgeon Sergio yes the teeth go tyrannosaurs are built to pierce flesh sure they can pierce a sauropod so easily but a ceratopsian probably acted like 4-5 bites in the same area and the triceratops would be getting its wounds and bleeding
@@Melanosuchusss I think you misunderstood what I was trying to say, so let's imagine the nanotyranno has teeth about 2 inches long and the thickness of a trike's hid is 3 inches, so you can see the nano's teeth would not be able to reach the flesh beneath the trike's hide and if it can't reach it, then the trike would not take any damage(no bleeding, no nothing) it would basically amount to the trike getting scratched a bit.
The cuts make it incredibly hard to watch
Omg triceratops wouldn’t have lost
For a long time I always thought that it was real but now it’s just a juvenile and I gave up but maybe someday someone can find the real tyrannosaur and call it nannotyrannus
Unfortunately no
Er, it's neither real (although it is likely to be so) nor a Tyrannosaur juvenile. That's kind of just a hypothesis.
Also if you're suggesting that a new tyrannosaur species be found and named Nanotyrannus, then no, that's not how it works and would go against the rules of naming the animals.
King Rexy
What about Brontosaurus excelsus?
@@awesomeproductions7755 bit hard to explain so I'll try to put it down simply
1- fossils were found
2- fossils were named Brontosaurus excelsus
3- fossils called Brontosaurus had been deemed synonymous with Apatosaurus.
4- fast forward a few decades, Brontosaurus fossils called Apatosaurus were studied again
5- said fossils showed that the original Brontosaurus fossils are indeed not Apatosaurus synonyms.
So basically, no new sauropod was just randomly named Brontosaurus, the Brontosaurus that has been made valid now is the same Brontosaurus as the original, it's just been split back into its own genus.
Basically just imagine if Carnotaurus was found to be a synonym of Majungasaurus, and later found to be different, then it would be called Carnotaurus again. You wouldn't create a brand new genus called Carnotaurus.
As much as I hate Jack Horner he is right
When are you going to share the new information on this controversial species?
Currently working on a Deviantart journal compiling all the available information. There is way too much so it will take a long while.
@@riamus7258 Oh, alright.
Nice T. rex video 😉
If only it were a real animal
Isn't this Bloody Mary (Tyrannosaurine Indet.)?
It is, but after comparing the skulls of Mary with Jane, I'm convinced that they're the same species so I have labelled it as Nanotyrannus just as how the show and the scientists studying Mary have as well.
Oh ok I get it now Thx
Do you still think it’s valid?
its just a juvenile T.rex
Not yet. Atm it remains dubious, yet to be proven to be either rex or valid.
That’s one I believe that nannotyrannus was real but unfortunately it’s not real I hate to say this nannotyrannus No longer exists
It's still up in the air
True
Models are great and accurate, but the animations are wonky and weird.
'The idea of a new smaller predator in the age of t-rex seemed impossible"
Dakotaraptor: Are you challenging me?
Alioramus from Nemegt formation: Are you challenging me?
Well I guess if you count tarbosaurus as trex.
@@user-qr2yr4ni4x oof I just reread your comment. I did a goof.
But yeah my point was supposed to be that looking at similar formations, a second large predator can certainly co-exist with our large predatory lad.
Tbh alioramus and dakotaraptor can't really be called large predators in their respective ecosystems.They seem to have been medium-sized mesopredators similar to the coyote and gray wolf in north america.This specialization towards a different niche would have allowed them to avoid direct competition with the larger apex predators of their regions.
@@user-qr2yr4ni4x medium sized if you ignore the fact that Alioramus like nano is only known from juvenile remains.
Is still dead this taxon ?
You need to elaborate xD
It's been proven they wasn't nanotyannus they where young t rexes nanotyannus doesn't exist this was film before they found out it there whee young t rexes
why are you skipping some clips?
I didn't skip any. This is a scene compilation of the nano in the docu.
The models, Lighting and texture looks amazing but the actual animation is... well a bit of a mess
Offense to your mind about strategy learning battlefield begins and you can’t lose you
Remember what suspected the listing was about and the great thing happened
Speed change lava code master plan to install new strategy fossil fuel and revenge
Remember your name on the real truth snuggle now and your other one has changed
People underestimate triceratops so much even tho its more deadly than trex 😤🙄