Please click the link to watch our other Weapon Detective videos ruclips.net/p/PLEMWqyRZP_LrdqB-XbqY2LocUVEaG_w7D Please click the link to watch our other Weapons of Russo Ukrainian War videos ruclips.net/p/PLEMWqyRZP_LpXx-5RDAc_25BSc7M3-Rs4 Please click the link to watch our other Russian-Soviet Systems videos ruclips.net/p/PLEMWqyRZP_LoX-Waa3Xb-clnCzQXpmcZ6 Please click the link to watch our other Weapon Detective-Land videos ruclips.net/p/PLEMWqyRZP_LpFkS9hH3KD9uTEKBDVQZRp
@@jamesstewart514 "So a RPG will destroy it and NLAWs and Javelins will launch the turret." This is the same sentiment given to the M551 Sheridan after they became an easy prey for anti-tank mines and RPG-2 during the Vietnam War. Surprise only to you but not to anyone else with a brain, Airborne vehicle has thin armor that save weight but not so much giving its crew Survivability. Ask any other Airborne vehicle designer and they'll tell you Airborne vehicles are not survivable in prolonged combat. The fact that you think this is a detriment exclusive to Russian airborne vehicle is laughable at best, worrying at worst.
@@curiouscaesar6813 I reckon the level of the vehicle makes a difference, as it can be lowered via the pneumatic suspension. Yet another clever solution to airborne tanks from our Russian cousins...
Even if you don't air drop, this is great for fast, light maneuver forces, it is also amphibious. Lots of nth/sth rivers in Europe/Russia, start with the Dnieper, and plan accordingly.
Wait, the crews are dropped along with the tank, sitting inside? Wow. I thought Halo ODST are badass. Never mind, these tank crews have taken the crown.
Crazy, no joke, I was just looking up this exact weapon a couple of days ago. The towed version resembles the D-30 howitzer. I was also interested in purchasing the vehicle in miniature for wargaming. It's one of those systems which for one reason or another, stand out in my mind.
I can only imagine how easily these will catastrophically detonate once penetrated like the bmp-3 and BMD-4s do. This is due to Russia not adhering to international insensitive munitions standards and their fuzes can be set off by overpressure once the hull is penetrated, the munition doesn’t even need to hit by shrapnel.
Very impressive light tank with no equivalents in the US and the West so far. It could be a more potent weapon if equipped with advanced ATGM counter-measures, automatic enemy detection and fire control systems.
@@username_3715 i mentioned its not amphibious buts its funny you think the sprut would ever be airdropped in a actual war. the cargo aircraft would be shot down well before it got to its destination. hence why russia didnt even attempt paradrop landings in ukraine. what real world difference does it make that c-130 cant carry it either when we have the c-5 galaxy?
Give it a better fire control system, slightly heavier armour, although heavy era would be better, a muzzle brake, better suspension and tracks, aswell as a slightly more powerful engine, probably by supercharging.
Light tanks are not meant to be equipped with thick armor. It's meant to provide firepower against lightly armored vehicles but Spurts tank's firepower is so powerful that it can destroy a main battle tank which is why it is unique
"The crew are inside when the self propelled gun is airdropped"; later at the Russian V.A. "We are sorry to inform you that your injuries are deemed not service related and your claim has been denied....🤣🤣🤣
France has a similar capability with the AMX10 RC : the light weeled tank is airdroppable, has a similar weight, a STANAG level 5 armor on the latest RCR version and it can play the role of a tank/armored vehicle destroyer with its 105mm gun. Not the same caliber as the Sprut but still a nice and punchy firepower : during the 1st Gulf War, Iraki tanks stood no chances against the AMX10 RCs
@Violent Cabbage yes, the 105mm APFSDS shell has been designed to defeat the Soviet armor of its time: T64, T72, early T90. Both AMX10 RC light tank and AMX30 MBT use this ammo. But I agree it wouldn't be enough against the latest reactive armors
@Violent Cabbage I've seen footages of the Daguet Operation during the first Gulf War in which French AMXs destroyed Iraki T72s with ERA with great effectiveness. Both AMX models sent (AMX 30 and AMX10 RC) have an 105mm barrel. But I agree with you, this caliber is now obsolete, even against the early versions of the modern NATO MBTs. That's why I like the smart move made by the French army to replace its 90/105mm light tanks by the Jaguar. This new recon tank is equipped with a 40mm autocannon to smash anything that aren't MBTs and MMP/Akeron ATGMs to safely destroy MBTs while being under cover
It has always been US Marines and Russian Paratroopers... Marines just decided they don't need their tanks, Russians on the other hand are starting to bring their tanks with them paras as well, I hope giving up on tanks doesn't end up for Marines as bad as giving up on aircraft guns turned out a poor decision for air force...
With drones knocking out tanks on their thin top armor , and insurgents knocking out tanks in their weak rear armor , why do tanks need heavy front armor ? I think this is the future , 4 of these are much more effective than one MBT . and they will get there first.
@Violent Cabbage I think there is a lot of room for gray areas , you might have good air defense but not in the valleys , or not on all the supply lines , or not above a certain altitude. I really think dollar for dollar ground based air defense is better because you can make the missiles so big and haul them around on trucks . How do you escape from a mach 16 missile with a 400Km range ? and if you figure that out the truck has 3 more just like it !
Thx. Judging by the dancing after firing, its max effective combat range would unlikely be over 1000m (TBH I would not feel comfortable firing anything beyond 500m). Also the missile firing demo shows it missed its target…. Having a such big gun with huge recoil with such light body makes it almost useless as a tank but more useful as a fire support vehicle or assault armoured vehicle (basically APC with big gun) which does not carry troops and does not have the accuracy unlike most modern tanks. This looks good on paper, but in a battle theatre, easy target for 2/3rd gen ATGM and IEDs. I would be surprised if it can withstand even RPG7.
Love the VDV. They learned the lessons of WW2 airborne operations- drop unsupported paratroopers into the middle or near armoured units and they get slaughtered while waiting for friendly tanks. Solution- DROP ARMOUR WITH THEM!
they couldn't have learned too much since they rarely deployed paratroopers in ww2. Many western countries consider their paratrooper light infantry and use them accordingly and has been very effective. Having armor with you exponentially increases the supply cost and with that comes the mindset of using ur paratroopers in non light infantry roles as you can see in Ukraine the vdv are being slaughtered.
can someone please explain to me why does Russia don't have these modern tanks in Ukraine if they had those tanks they wouldn't have their butts handed to them
![Ice On My Teeth - ATEEZ エイティーズ 에이티즈 [Music Bank] | KBS WORLD TV 241115](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/c-n92OgbbwA/mqdefault.jpg)
Please click the link to watch our other Weapon Detective videos
ruclips.net/p/PLEMWqyRZP_LrdqB-XbqY2LocUVEaG_w7D
Please click the link to watch our other Weapons of Russo Ukrainian War videos
ruclips.net/p/PLEMWqyRZP_LpXx-5RDAc_25BSc7M3-Rs4
Please click the link to watch our other Russian-Soviet Systems videos
ruclips.net/p/PLEMWqyRZP_LoX-Waa3Xb-clnCzQXpmcZ6
Please click the link to watch our other Weapon Detective-Land videos
ruclips.net/p/PLEMWqyRZP_LpFkS9hH3KD9uTEKBDVQZRp
Can you make video about zpu 14.5 mm machine gun from soviet era
it's an airdroppable T72 without armor ...
thank you for your formidable videos .
@James Stewart Why would the Russians airdrop a light tank without airborne troops?
@@jamesstewart514 "So a RPG will destroy it and NLAWs and Javelins will launch the turret."
This is the same sentiment given to the M551 Sheridan after they became an easy prey for anti-tank mines and RPG-2 during the Vietnam War. Surprise only to you but not to anyone else with a brain, Airborne vehicle has thin armor that save weight but not so much giving its crew Survivability. Ask any other Airborne vehicle designer and they'll tell you Airborne vehicles are not survivable in prolonged combat. The fact that you think this is a detriment exclusive to Russian airborne vehicle is laughable at best, worrying at worst.
@@jamesstewart514 most intelligent NATO shill lol
Considering that this vehicle was project of artillery branch at end, it is effectively modern tank destroyer, modern "Hellcat".
In my top five favorite armored vehicles.
Great video. :)
Well done, your breakdown and presentation was first rate... thank you very much!
Jesus that recoil
So pronounced only because of the light weight of the vehicle
@@curiouscaesar6813 I reckon the level of the vehicle makes a difference, as it can be lowered via the pneumatic suspension. Yet another clever solution to airborne tanks from our Russian cousins...
Even if you don't air drop, this is great for fast, light maneuver forces, it is also amphibious.
Lots of nth/sth rivers in Europe/Russia, start with the Dnieper, and plan accordingly.
Sounds a bit like the M-18 Hellcat tankhunter from WWII
Yet another great video, don't stop!
Nice video detective! Keep em coming. 👍👍
Wait, the crews are dropped along with the tank, sitting inside? Wow. I thought Halo ODST are badass. Never mind, these tank crews have taken the crown.
heavy parachute system called "centaur"
Tanks for sharing. Thumbs up
Crazy, no joke, I was just looking up this exact weapon a couple of days ago. The towed version resembles the D-30 howitzer. I was also interested in purchasing the vehicle in miniature for wargaming. It's one of those systems which for one reason or another, stand out in my mind.
Bot the old and new sort are available for free in war thunder ;)
Im not really suggest y'all to play wt because it toxic grind environment
@@soto1649 i have 3 nations at top tier so it's a bit to late for me haha
I got 4 xd top tier grind really give me anxiety
I can’t get that video of all the dead VDV spilling out of these out of my head.
Great job. Thanks. Is sprut getting a 800cc engine upgrade
great analysis
I can only imagine how easily these will catastrophically detonate once penetrated like the bmp-3 and BMD-4s do. This is due to Russia not adhering to international insensitive munitions standards and their fuzes can be set off by overpressure once the hull is penetrated, the munition doesn’t even need to hit by shrapnel.
this is a fucking light tank my guy☠💀💀
Oh shut up nafo clowns. Your tanks and armored vehicles are also flying in orbit over Ukraine bahahaha
Russia should produce more these multi-purpose light tank and export overseas 🙏
Countries buying Russian arms will incur sanctions
@@annoyedcat9291 🤣
Good job
I Love the Turret shape ❤😍
Your content is propably used in this canal
PRO Tech
Being a crew member inside an air dropped tank! A Bucket List wish for your least favourite person?
6:53 Recoil is a thing ...
It's recoil right after the charge leave the barrel, probably they design it that way.
Very impressive light tank with no equivalents in the US and the West so far. It could be a more potent weapon if equipped with advanced ATGM counter-measures, automatic enemy detection and fire control systems.
The United States’ mpf is exactly what this sprutsd is minus the amphibious capability.
@@TheBic4 MPF can't even be airlifted by c130 let alone parachuted and it's not amphibious
@@username_3715 i mentioned its not amphibious buts its funny you think the sprut would ever be airdropped in a actual war. the cargo aircraft would be shot down well before it got to its destination. hence why russia didnt even attempt paradrop landings in ukraine. what real world difference does it make that c-130 cant carry it either when we have the c-5 galaxy?
Give it a better fire control system, slightly heavier armour, although heavy era would be better, a muzzle brake, better suspension and tracks, aswell as a slightly more powerful engine, probably by supercharging.
Light tanks are not meant to be equipped with thick armor. It's meant to provide firepower against lightly armored vehicles but Spurts tank's firepower is so powerful that it can destroy a main battle tank which is why it is unique
Please make a video on JF-17 Thunder Fighter Jet !
"The crew are inside when the self propelled gun is airdropped"; later at the Russian V.A. "We are sorry to inform you that your injuries are deemed not service related and your claim has been denied....🤣🤣🤣
France has a similar capability with the AMX10 RC : the light weeled tank is airdroppable, has a similar weight, a STANAG level 5 armor on the latest RCR version and it can play the role of a tank/armored vehicle destroyer with its 105mm gun. Not the same caliber as the Sprut but still a nice and punchy firepower : during the 1st Gulf War, Iraki tanks stood no chances against the AMX10 RCs
Thanks for your interest. Please check out our AMX-10RC video
ruclips.net/video/jmeeAXLueVo/видео.html
@Violent Cabbage yes, the 105mm APFSDS shell has been designed to defeat the Soviet armor of its time: T64, T72, early T90.
Both AMX10 RC light tank and AMX30 MBT use this ammo.
But I agree it wouldn't be enough against the latest reactive armors
@Violent Cabbage I've seen footages of the Daguet Operation during the first Gulf War in which French AMXs destroyed Iraki T72s with ERA with great effectiveness. Both AMX models sent (AMX 30 and AMX10 RC) have an 105mm barrel.
But I agree with you, this caliber is now obsolete, even against the early versions of the modern NATO MBTs.
That's why I like the smart move made by the French army to replace its 90/105mm light tanks by the Jaguar. This new recon tank is equipped with a 40mm autocannon to smash anything that aren't MBTs and MMP/Akeron ATGMs to safely destroy MBTs while being under cover
Please make a vedio on Arjun MK2
Chup kar be
No
@@Snp2024😂😂😂😂 thank you.
Hear this light AT vehicle can be air dropped with troops inside.
As a Chinese I admire the mechanized paratroopers of the Russian army very much and hope that China can have such a mighty airborne force someday.
It has always been US Marines and Russian Paratroopers... Marines just decided they don't need their tanks, Russians on the other hand are starting to bring their tanks with them paras as well, I hope giving up on tanks doesn't end up for Marines as bad as giving up on aircraft guns turned out a poor decision for air force...
Marines spent the tank budget on F-35(b)s. This will surely end well.
But there are also Russian Marines and Coastal Troops though, and they get the same tanks as the Regular Army.
Don't know how they gonna drop their troops and light tanks from plane when AA defend systems are everywhere, SEAD mission is hard.
Marines use lav25 or lav3
Designed in 2014 to be airdropped with the crew inside! No wonder Russian soldiers are drunk.
Ehm, it's armour defeating capabilities aren't adequate to penitrate the frontal armour of a modern mbt..
That depends on the 125mm shell or missile used, since these are standardized between T-90 and 2S25.
@@legatvsdecimvs3406 the penitrators arent long enought...
@@para-tankermake them lomger and they definitely would be.
India might order it
With drones knocking out tanks on their thin top armor , and insurgents knocking out tanks in their weak rear armor , why do tanks need heavy front armor ? I think this is the future , 4 of these are much more effective than one MBT . and they will get there first.
@Violent Cabbage I think there is a lot of room for gray areas , you might have good air defense but not in the valleys , or not on all the supply lines , or not above a certain altitude. I really think dollar for dollar ground based air defense is better because you can make the missiles so big and haul them around on trucks . How do you escape from a mach 16 missile with a 400Km range ? and if you figure that out the truck has 3 more just like it !
Thx.
Judging by the dancing after firing, its max effective combat range would unlikely be over 1000m (TBH I would not feel comfortable firing anything beyond 500m). Also the missile firing demo shows it missed its target….
Having a such big gun with huge recoil with such light body makes it almost useless as a tank but more useful as a fire support vehicle or assault armoured vehicle (basically APC with big gun) which does not carry troops and does not have the accuracy unlike most modern tanks.
This looks good on paper, but in a battle theatre, easy target for 2/3rd gen ATGM and IEDs. I would be surprised if it can withstand even RPG7.
Love the VDV. They learned the lessons of WW2 airborne operations- drop unsupported paratroopers into the middle or near armoured units and they get slaughtered while waiting for friendly tanks. Solution- DROP ARMOUR WITH THEM!
they couldn't have learned too much since they rarely deployed paratroopers in ww2. Many western countries consider their paratrooper light infantry and use them accordingly and has been very effective. Having armor with you exponentially increases the supply cost and with that comes the mindset of using ur paratroopers in non light infantry roles as you can see in Ukraine the vdv are being slaughtered.
@@profesercreeper In Gostomel, yes. Elsewhere the VDV have operated effectively, particularly during the battle for Kherson.
can someone please explain to me why does Russia don't have these modern tanks in Ukraine if they had those tanks they wouldn't have their butts handed to them
It's not in service yet