Make this man Vimoh sit in front of Muslim intellectuall Mohammad hijab(who has destroyed top atheists in his Debates),and you will see how he staggers
A simple and easy rule to follow is challenging your views and always being open to different perspectives, even if it may lower your confidence in your beliefs. I know it's hard as a human, but this is the way.
Hello vimoh sir I'm neet aspirant student who saw the casteism in my hostel and coaching the teacher used to teach us sometimes uses casteist slur ch**r for students who didn't corporate with them .even students first ask categories and use -------words for students who come from sc st backgraund very disturbed..🙏😞
Can't believe coz I have spent 1 year in pw vidyapeeth (Kota) & never experienced it even I had some friends frm motion who were frm Bihar and neither they
I refuse to believe this and sadden if this is still relevant in India and teachers doing it...... Kuch nahi bhai tum apni tayyari karte rehna achha doctor banna.....
Does this Saboor guy not have a basic science education? He doesn’t know anything about evolution though natural selection which is the foundation of modern life sciences. Thank you Vimoh for an amazing response!
@@eldhoabraham1444I like most of vimoh vedio but today I don't think he did a good job, because what it felt like was strawman argument, suboor need to explain in 1 minutes so he broadly explain it like 1) necessasity 2) chance 3) god design All can included evolution as a part even if you are deist you can believe in evolution so no issue in they, so bringing evolution doesn't make any sense here because all 3 possibility can include, even if you claim that 3rd was allah, that would still not prove that evolution cant in 1st or 2nd possibilities
@@eldhoabraham1444against vimoh doesn't know the position of saboor, and claiming that he is wrong when he is talking about about cognitive reason and origin of reason can't be explained by evolution, that is his point but because he needed to keep it short he simply made statment without explaining his position ( saboor)
@@eldhoabraham1444and another thing he talked about Darwinism, idk know about India but outside many people use Darwinism as a academic term, he made his position clear in his debate with bob Anyway there are many problems such as these because he didn't got the time to make position clear that is why do many issue occur
Please make a video on the topics discussed in this video at 8 min 30second and 15 minute on YT (5 feb) Dr Vikas Divyakirti Vs Mufti Yasir Nadeem al Wajidi
VIMOH IS LOVE ❤ PROUD ATHIEST ,AND LEFTIST KEEP UP THE GREAT WORK 🎉 theist PROVIDE THE DUMBEST ARGUMENT. LOGIC ANIT LOGICING.😂 lots IF RESPECT TO ATHIEST FROM A EX ANDHBHAT❤ YOU SAVED ME IN A SENSE I AM BEYOND GREATFULL
By necessity he mean is it by law of nature, like mass always pulls towards it, entropy always increases or H2 reaction with 02 produces H2O. Necessity is not about arrogance it means, "is that a law of nature that life always comes up with certain chemical reactions." Thats the meaning of Necessity
Oh my god Bhai 😮😮🥶🫨😰😱 title mein toh debunked likha hai , aur ek insaan these hota hai haina? 🤡 Yaar in dharmiko ke past mein jaakar thoda inke maa baap ko roko koi gobar bharne se aate jaate kuch bhi bole jaate hai, logical arguments gayi bhaad mein Hume toh criticise karna hai jiska video se koi talluk Tak nahi hai
@@Hrst-e7l 🤡 ha , maine samjha ki tum tunni ho , vimoh ke offence mein baat kar rahein ho , meri hi galati hai Ghar mein jhagda hogaya tha uska gussa Chadha tha isliye tumpar bhi utar Gaya sorry bhai :) Yahan toh mai hi andhbhakt ban Gaya iss baar
@@Hrst-e7l Jainism , buddhism hai convert karlo nahi chaiye toh , waise usse koi farak nahi padta kyuki koi naam se kisi religion se nahi ho jata us religion ke practices se hota hai aur agar tum hinduism ke practices ko deny kar rahein ho toh tum us religion ke nahi ho , atleast practicing toh nahin ho
Running or swimming fast is not always a good idea, its like having bigger tyres and bigger engines. And mutation two different mutations should occur simultaneously to provide both which is again highly improbable. Suppose even if it happens it is Good to run away from police or to catch thieves. But if fuel is costly you wont survive. So not always a benefit.
Design does not only mean orderliness. If a cycle is designed it does not only means that the two tyres and frames are arranged in a certain order, it mains the cycle exists for a PURPOSE. The heart has a design not because the muscle tissues tissues are ordered in a certain fashion but because the heart has a purpose. The lungs have a purpose, the eyes have a purpose. The purpose is to keep us alive. The matter of which we are made of doesn't care if the order in which it is arranged is alive or dead. The matter still remains matter. But the mind which is responsible to bring this design into existence does care. Purpose does not occur by random chance.
Hey vimoh how can I tackle this statement that " what is the reason that you believe that Socrates existed but Ram or jisus didn't do everything that we know about these characters were written in a book only " ..? Please give something to deal with this 😊
Personal opinion:- reasonable to beleive all these three existed, Unreasonable to beleive all of the things their books say they did... by our understanding of this world. Like a reference point, a man on donkey can't cut the moon by himself with current technology, let alone doing it 2000 years ago, makes it unreasonable... And then claims that he had ancient technology that could do it but is somehow lost or can't be rediscovered, still doesn't get anywhere, again unreasonable.
Many living things have gone extinct including vegetation and micro organisms. May be whatever we are consuming today to keep us healthy, may evolve themselves so that humans cannot grow and eat them. May be the chickens will lay eggs that may not be edible. May be that will starve humans to extinction.
Nah he is a clown Recently Professor dave tore him to pieces Go watch the video. He doesnt understand evolution, he is just a clueless creationist He also debated james fodor, james fodor owned him He never debated in moderndaydebates lol he was invited few times never accpted
The Bajau are traditionally nomadic and seafaring, and survive by collecting shellfish from the sea floor. Scientists studying the effect of this lifestyle on their biology found their spleens were larger than those of related people from the region You can watch the video by "BE SMART" on 'Are we still evolving?'
@@sariyasaham6997 The whole purpose of evolution is to keep on surviving through adaptation, isn't it ? What do you expect from evolution - to grow an extra pair of legs even when you don't need them?
Don't argue scientifically it's simple Intelligent design were created by creator who was in turn was created by a creator who was in turn was created by a creator.. infinity. It's as simple as that and it was know to us in 6th century why not in the first century ?you know Why? Don't ask only believe.
well i could argue with reference to advaita vedanta that the universe itself is pure consciousness , it manifests itself again and again and again ...infinity , but do i know that for a fact in any frame of reference , again im not disrespecting it as i find the idea quite interesting , but i dont believe in it because i dont have any explanation to it in my frame of reference,hence simply , i dont know
Creator of a creator leads argument to infinite regress which is not possible. Vimoh himself says it many times. Had infinite regress been possible then nothing would exist. Therefore the buck stops at an uncaused cause, an uncreated creator.
God has a design, he/she is complex but God don't need designer 😅. Everything can't just pop up, there has to be creator, but God don't need creator 😅 I don't understand these religions logic
This man is creating an illusion to keep people locked in their delusion. These guys put so much efforts in production, little did they knew that a man would just hit record and take a piss on their content.
@@ThoughtfulVoyagerwassup bro I'm an immature kid , do you have any media by which we could talk so that you could tell me things from which I could learn from because it's hard for me to understand some words sometimes, although Vijay does a good job in translating and putting it in a very simple way but I thought I could learn from more atheists ?
In my case, he is right, main god ko manana hi nahi chahta. Agar god ko man liya to wo to tumhe nark me hi bhejega jis terah ke karm hai. Agar wo nahi bhejega to to dusare dharm wale god to pakka nark bhej denge, kyoki unako to nahi mane. Agar god ko manoge hi nahi, to ko god tumhe judge hi nahi karega. Tum apni marji se kisi god ke pas bhi ja kar, swarg keliye appeal kar sakte ho. Isliye nahi manoge to marne ke bad swarg jane ka jyada probability hai.
Bhai Random mutation = chance. Moreover cells have an ability to destroy itself incase mutation occurs. And still if mutation cells survive, it leads to cancer not ability to swim or run fast.
@@sai6118 Bhai mere cells mein mutation genetic mutation ki wajah se hi hota hai. Jab bhi kaha jata hai ki any cell has mutation, it means it has a genetic mutation or a genetic anamoly.
Since everyone is talking about evolution, i have a more important question why was only humans / homosapiens able to develop such a complex brain. Can other animals achieve our level of consciousness ?why not. P.S: I strongly agree with his idea that even if we were created by someone it's more likely that we are the byproduct (un-necessarily results )of this vast universe.
Why only humans is a flawed question. I could also ask why only blue whale evolved to be the largest animal on earth, or why only ants evolved to have the highest population. Evolution does not have an end goal. Small changes happen, and the changes that are useful for the organism at that moment end up persisting. Others die out. Eventually all the small changes accumulate into something very different.
@@sheikhaftab8510bhai baat ye h ki god chahe kisi religion ka ho wo science me g**nd poke karta h to science taufa kabool kar leta h phir theist logo ki tashreef me pain hota h 😂😂
It takes few percent of life to accept truth of your childhood lie. Maybe it will take few percent of humanity's existence to accept this theory. This few percent would be around 1000 of years.
It’s not about achi presentation and all lmao. He has done debates in person as well as live and also did long livestreams in the past talking, discussing and answering questions about various topics including evolution. Disagree, present your argument but don’t misrepresent.
And he lost all the debates.. Specially his debate with James fodor lol And he doesnt understand evolution, he used bullshit Philosophy to debunk scientific evidence. Since when did philosophy started to trump evidence? Lol For clueless muslims with no scientific knowledge, he is a great man But in the scientific community he is just a clown Bring him to moderndaydebates with a good biologist I'm pretty sure he wouldn't debate considering what James fodor did to him in a debate lmao
Problem of vimoh! 1. How life started? If it is produce randomly then, we can say evolution occurred randomly. But every geo chemist deny on pridomial soup, miller and urey theory.
@@vimoh Yes, abinogenesis is hypothesis. And Evolution is true, but subur's point is all about Neo-Darwinism. If you prove beginning of life without creator, Neo Darwinism will be proved automatically.
@@vimoh "Natural selection" is the confusing term, 1. So is nature intelligent? 2. Is nature not intelligent? How nature become such intelligent, that it can produce life from pridomial soup(hypothesis) and making random experiment and intelligent human is produced. And if nature perform random experiment, then where is pre human animal which time to become man will come tomorrow(because it ia random).
@@vimoh If nature perform selection /evolution randomly, then why is not random. Where is random order? Where is pre human Animal those time to being Human will come tomorrow / next week. Australopithecus to homo sapiens race need to random. All the pre human can not reach in same time.
Have a look at this debunk video . Paradox institute debunked forest's video. Video name: Biology of Sex: Detailed Analysis of Forrest Valkai's "Sex and Sensibility" I personally think that they did pretty well to debunk it
What about the source of impermanent consciousness life cannot be a nothing. Impermanent lifeforms can come out of a permanent source or else even impermanence is not possible. For threads to exist there needs to be cotton. For painting to exist a background sheet has to be there. For movie pictures to exist a screen has to be there.
@@vimoh universe is matter so it cannot be the background on which another matter exists. Most scientists are now strongly feeling that there has to be something behind time- space for time- space to exist.
The argument that the universe, being matter, cannot be the background for another form of matter commits the composition fallacy. Just because the universe consists of matter doesn't mean it cannot contain or be the background for other elements or phenomena. Additionally, stating that 'most scientists' believe something without providing evidence or references falls into the argument from authority fallacy. In reality, the nature of space-time and the possibility of something beyond it are still areas of active research and debate in cosmology and theoretical physics. Various theories and hypotheses exist, but definitive conclusions are yet to be reached.@@Yogakshema_vahamyaham
Evolution is continuous process the question is why we can't see clearly because it takes thousands of years . best example , human organs which are no longer needed e.g.Appendix ,Vestigial organs ,human hair Why do these exist because our ancestors need these organs
It isn't. We're still evolving. All life around us is. The process happens over generations, so it's more observable in species that have shorter lives, like fruit flies etc, who you can study multiple generations of in the matter of a few years.
You are making a mistake. Evolution is a random process. Have you heard of evolutionary algorithm, cross over and mutation. Beside the goal of evolution is to survive in the nature. its not about perfection, its about survival. So, this survival nature gives some guidance while selecting gene pool but the new gene creation process is random So evolution cannot answer followings therefore it is still a unproven theory. it is not widely acccepted by the scientific community nor rejected specially in the light of fine tuning and creative sign exist in the nature. 1. Evolution cannot answer how random mutation and cross over of gene which have extremely low chance of creating something that would meet the demand of circumstances present always results in something that works. For instance, we have not found any fossils of any animal which malformed. Every evolutionary creation is always well formed. we never seen three eyes, one eyesanimals. 2. genetic variation that exist among humans and other complex life forms are too complex to evolve in such a short period of few million years. Remember no sign of human before 300 thousands years then just appeared in Africa. then evolve over a short period of time 3. Consciousness and rational thinking. how random evolutionary process emanate rational, logical process. its just does not make sense. 4. the initiation of life cannot be answered by evolution whatever, evolution is not a good theory to answer the origin of life. its for sure. I would not bet my money in favor of this
@@owaiskhan7047 Mutations are changes in the DNA sequence that can be caused by various factors, such as errors during DNA replication or exposure to mutagens like radiation or certain chemicals. These mutations are considered random because they occur regardless of whether they would be beneficial, harmful, or neutral to an organism's survival or reproduction. The process of natural selection then acts on these random mutations, determining whether they become more or less common in a population based on their effects on an organism's ability to survive and reproduce in its environment.
@@aaronhemrom545 whatever reasons you mentioned can also be a part of God's master plan, according to me you can't call mutations random until you disprove existence of God. I think it is more appropriate to say that mutations happen but we don't know whether they are random or done by God, being agnostic about this too should not be a big problem for atheists.
@@owaiskhan7047 things don't work by assumption like maybe someone did......we need enough frame of reference and proofs to support that statement whether it can be proven or not..... we have reason why it happens we have enough reason and evidence to prove it's random and we have zero evidence to prove that God did it....and when it comes to appropriate I don't think it's appropriate being agnostic about flying unicorn and and god like pasta in earth
you leave what you do not know to god like you do not know creation of universe correctly this is why you say god created and you do not know what is afterlife so you say heaven and hell and whenever you come to know you create law and leave god there is a lot of science in this universe to create the stage and does god see the good and evil in this stage ? What is effective- hand or prayer ?
Also ask him cell ke ander jo genetics information to evolve itself by mutation, woh genetic coding kaha se aa gayi jo ki ek protein ke liye code krne lag gayi, this is called minimum gene concept.
@@rajhasan147 if it's your belief I can't do anything about it , All I can say is extraordinary claims require Extraordinary evidence , Your belief doesn't make up the reality and others opinions , I believe that there is a proper reasoning behind it yet to be found , till then I can clearly say that "I don't know"
Let’s say there is a god, who says that he is good? There are children dying everyday and your god doesn’t do anything about it. So either god isn’t good or he isn’t omnipotent or he doesn’t care.
@@devendraSingh19aug no, but it (god) is no benevolent entity from the persepctive of us sapiens, unlike what we sapiens ourselves claim. Emphasis on us humans claiming that it is benevolent.
Environment nein machli direct kese a agaya? Basic class 12ki ncert mein straight likha hyy- "we have no clear idea how the first self-replicating metabolic capsule of life arose"
he has no idead of what he is talking about (vimol). Soobur is on an another level. the interest of watching this video died the very moment he said EVOLUTION. 🤦♂🤦♂LOL O BHAI !!!! suboor makes 3 options and he makes rest of his claims on tht but ye vimol to bhai kuch oor hi duniya em haay
"Now there is three ways that somebody can explain biological design. Biological design is either the result of chance, or it's necessity, it's just meant to be that way. Or there is a God, there is a designer" Two of the three options that suboor is giving to explain how biological design works are 1. Everything is based on chance 2. It's just meant to be Paraphrasing what vimoh says about the first option- Suboor uses chance based to explain evolution. But that's not what evolution is. Evolution is not chance based, no one ever said that it is chance based. The research and data that we have now goes to show that species develop new mutations every now and then and whether that mutation is carried forward in their gene or not depends on how their habitat responds to it. The second point sounds juvenile, since it tells you to just accept what there is without looking for any meaning behind it. I think Mr. Suboor just added that alternative to make it look like he is offering more quantity of options, which in reality he is not, considering the fact that neither atheists nor theists are willing to accept things as they are without looking for any answers. In fact the atheists are actually more inclined to look for answers because they don't rely on older, outdated arguments to support their understanding. The rigidity of religion and its reliance on uncontested and seemingly "undeniable truths" Is what makes it unable to answer questions posed by agnostics and atheists.
*Subboor ahmed is a Jalebi-man...makes jalebis around arguments only to twist that Argument to a different topic He's familiar with, Just So that he can beat you...these muslim apologists are the most dishonest people you will ever come across.*
bruh still thinks we're living in Darwin's paradigm, wake up bruh, saboor has already dealt with the neo darwinian arguments which you can't even comprehend yet.
@@Shubuu17 Why don't you take a look at the reaction videos between Smile2Jannah and Vimoh. Not only you'll find who is foolish but also misleading and lier
@@vimohI'm studying science and I don't see any problem with that. On the contrary you are arrogant and ignorant to study scriptures(maybe other than hinduism).
@@ThoughtfulVoyager yes this too evidence based assumption that in a single prokaryotic cell, all molecules combined and RNA formed then DNA which has an information to code for a protein. where did you get minimum set of gene before first cell? Remember that information cannot come itself and what is the deciding factor of coding according to you at the initial stage? Is nature deciding the codings by combining molecules? Is the nature putting these information to the RNA and DNA? Is nature conscious?
@@ThoughtfulVoyager brother every scientist can make a story saying its an evidence based theory but remember that they will tell you how it happened, they won't tell you who did it or what was the cause behind that. They can never answer the question that who decided the certain molecules combine to form a gene for coding which has an information. As you do coding in computer creating an information same as who combined the molecules in a certain way to code for a gene which has information to make certain proteins? Don't refer me to a video because they will tell me how did it happen, tell me who did it?
@@ThoughtfulVoyager have you ever studied molecular biology? Coding system in a DNA? How some molecules or compounds like adnine guanine thymine arranged together to have a information i.e gene which can make a certain proteins, tell me where this information come from? What the deciding factor? If its natural then is nature this much conscious and this much intelligence that it knows what is good or bad for survival, how nature got this ability to identify the better way of survival or evolve the universe in the best measurement. Tell me about minimal genome that is how the first cell got the minimum set of genes to survive at the first time? Just don't say natural, explain it. When I'm saying that any scientist can make up a story evidence based is only about this perticular topic about the first cell evolution bcoz there were many theories which were rubbish and disproved by scientists. Also Dawkins believes that this could be the alien who planted the genes or first cell. There is book called There is God by Antony Flew who was a staunch atheist till 95yo then he admitted by looking at the DNA structure and the coding and the mechanism, he found there is signature of some higher intelligence in DNA. I recommend you to read that book.
@Liyakat-nl8vp scriptures are controversial saar but Bhagwan Buddha is different to scriptures saaar Nobody worship Buddha saar but praise him saar Worshipping is to Cosmic energy saar. You don't worship human but praise saar.
Nothing in Biology Makes Sense Except in the Light of Evolution.
- T. Dobzhansky
@@LordDajjal432yeh tatti kisne ki hai isko koi uthake flush kardo
Much appreciated debunk of this 'charismatic' word salad
kiii
I used to have a dogmatic mindset but watching your videos helps to view things from an alternative angle. Thank you
Good
Vimoh said personality nhi hoti .... vimoh we are attracted by your Rational Mind not personality. 😊
I second this
Bhai. Rationality or rational mind itself can be personality
Wait, who says Vimoh doesn't have a personality? He has a great personality, and a mind to match it!
Make this man Vimoh sit in front of Muslim intellectuall Mohammad hijab(who has destroyed top atheists in his Debates),and you will see how he staggers
@@theseeker4308 lol, Mojab and his dawah gang are a joke. None considers them as intellectuals other than Islamist apologists.
Kisne kaha Rationalist k pass Personality nahi hai?Ek Rationalist k Pass Aapke Jaise Personality hona hi Garv ki baat hai Sir✊🇮🇳
A simple and easy rule to follow is challenging your views and always being open to different perspectives, even if it may lower your confidence in your beliefs. I know it's hard as a human, but this is the way.
Hello vimoh sir I'm neet aspirant student who saw the casteism in my hostel and coaching the teacher used to teach us sometimes uses casteist slur ch**r for students who didn't corporate with them .even students first ask categories and use -------words for students who come from sc st backgraund very disturbed..🙏😞
Kota me?
Can't believe coz I have spent 1 year in pw vidyapeeth (Kota) & never experienced it even I had some friends frm motion who were frm Bihar and neither they
I refuse to believe this and sadden if this is still relevant in India and teachers doing it...... Kuch nahi bhai tum apni tayyari karte rehna achha doctor banna.....
Such simple yet intellectual answers.
Thanks!
Welcome!
Personality ka pata nhi, but ur voice is literally af, ngl. Like soothing one.
Thank you Vimoh sir
Does this Saboor guy not have a basic science education? He doesn’t know anything about evolution though natural selection which is the foundation of modern life sciences. Thank you Vimoh for an amazing response!
Vimoh sir apki personality aur bolne ka tarika interesting hai and your voice ❤
Thank you so much
Thanks vimoh this is a much needed video please make videos on dr zakir naik and his arguments 🙏
Why You don't do formal debates with religious people on formal channel like Modern Day Debates.
Good work! Ahmed Suboor with his fallacies due to dogma thinks that he is some kind of scientist or scholar
@@LordDajjal432 Bhai kuch logical argument tho de dete. Faaltu comment kar rahe ho Bina matlab ka
@@eldhoabraham1444I like most of vimoh vedio but today I don't think he did a good job, because what it felt like was strawman argument, suboor need to explain in 1 minutes so he broadly explain it like
1) necessasity
2) chance
3) god design
All can included evolution as a part even if you are deist you can believe in evolution so no issue in they, so bringing evolution doesn't make any sense here because all 3 possibility can include, even if you claim that 3rd was allah, that would still not prove that evolution cant in 1st or 2nd possibilities
@@eldhoabraham1444as for random mutations based on orderly circumstances that is arguable point
@@eldhoabraham1444against vimoh doesn't know the position of saboor, and claiming that he is wrong when he is talking about about cognitive reason and origin of reason can't be explained by evolution, that is his point but because he needed to keep it short he simply made statment without explaining his position ( saboor)
@@eldhoabraham1444and another thing he talked about Darwinism, idk know about India but outside many people use Darwinism as a academic term, he made his position clear in his debate with bob
Anyway there are many problems such as these because he didn't got the time to make position clear that is why do many issue occur
Very true argument
Please make a video on the topics discussed in this video at 8 min 30second and 15 minute on YT (5 feb) Dr Vikas Divyakirti Vs Mufti Yasir Nadeem al Wajidi
Kindly make video about how consciousness was created and how can we define it
Plz make a video on books you read and get knowledge
The limited number of possibilities : And why creator is not one of them?
Love you,Vimoh sir!
Sometimes the level of ignorance is truly baffling or maybe they are aware of it and are either in denial or fooling their viewers.
Bro I hope you Start doing Formal debate with Muslims and Hindus
VIMOH IS LOVE ❤ PROUD ATHIEST ,AND LEFTIST KEEP UP THE GREAT WORK 🎉 theist PROVIDE THE DUMBEST ARGUMENT. LOGIC ANIT LOGICING.😂 lots IF RESPECT TO ATHIEST FROM A EX ANDHBHAT❤ YOU SAVED ME IN A SENSE I AM BEYOND GREATFULL
Great explaination sir ji !
Agree with some points, but not with others
Ye to assertion and reason wala question jaise sound kr rha hai
Love Vimoh's self deprecating humor
By necessity he mean is it by law of nature, like mass always pulls towards it, entropy always increases or H2 reaction with 02 produces H2O.
Necessity is not about arrogance it means, "is that a law of nature that life always comes up with certain chemical reactions."
Thats the meaning of Necessity
Good explanation. Useful to answer my own questions regarding evolution. I do experience self doubt sometimes. What if I am wrong?
I like your small videos Vimoh।
These people construct their entire argument by themselves and refute their own questions and upload it on RUclips with 'DEBUNKED' title.
Oh my god Bhai 😮😮🥶🫨😰😱 title mein toh debunked likha hai , aur ek insaan these hota hai haina? 🤡 Yaar in dharmiko ke past mein jaakar thoda inke maa baap ko roko koi gobar bharne se aate jaate kuch bhi bole jaate hai, logical arguments gayi bhaad mein Hume toh criticise karna hai jiska video se koi talluk Tak nahi hai
@@scoobyaura-fr6dm Mujhe bol rahe ho?
@@Hrst-e7l 🤡 ha , maine samjha ki tum tunni ho , vimoh ke offence mein baat kar rahein ho , meri hi galati hai Ghar mein jhagda hogaya tha uska gussa Chadha tha isliye tumpar bhi utar Gaya sorry bhai :)
Yahan toh mai hi andhbhakt ban Gaya iss baar
@@scoobyaura-fr6dm Bhay kya karu hindu naam hai aadhar card me ni likha hai koi non religious naam btao rkh lunga
@@Hrst-e7l Jainism , buddhism hai convert karlo nahi chaiye toh , waise usse koi farak nahi padta kyuki koi naam se kisi religion se nahi ho jata us religion ke practices se hota hai aur agar tum hinduism ke practices ko deny kar rahein ho toh tum us religion ke nahi ho , atleast practicing toh nahin ho
Running or swimming fast is not always a good idea, its like having bigger tyres and bigger engines. And mutation two different mutations should occur simultaneously to provide both which is again highly improbable. Suppose even if it happens it is Good to run away from police or to catch thieves. But if fuel is costly you wont survive. So not always a benefit.
Design does not only mean orderliness. If a cycle is designed it does not only means that the two tyres and frames are arranged in a certain order, it mains the cycle exists for a PURPOSE.
The heart has a design not because the muscle tissues tissues are ordered in a certain fashion but because the heart has a purpose. The lungs have a purpose, the eyes have a purpose.
The purpose is to keep us alive.
The matter of which we are made of doesn't care if the order in which it is arranged is alive or dead. The matter still remains matter.
But the mind which is responsible to bring this design into existence does care.
Purpose does not occur by random chance.
Hey vimoh how can I tackle this statement that " what is the reason that you believe that Socrates existed but Ram or jisus didn't do everything that we know about these characters were written in a book only " ..? Please give something to deal with this 😊
Personal opinion:- reasonable to beleive all these three existed,
Unreasonable to beleive all of the things their books say they did... by our understanding of this world. Like a reference point, a man on donkey can't cut the moon by himself with current technology, let alone doing it 2000 years ago, makes it unreasonable... And then claims that he had ancient technology that could do it but is somehow lost or can't be rediscovered, still doesn't get anywhere, again unreasonable.
@@NeKo19113you just called out a particular religion💀😂
@@swapnaneeldas3227it can be anytg guy cutting moon in two halves building a human thru mud or a monkey going to eat a sun
Enjoyed this
na acha set hota hai, na achi editing hoti hai, na hi achi personality hoti hai.... motivating me to start my own channel :)
0:51 us moment ho gya yeh toh
Many living things have gone extinct including vegetation and micro organisms. May be whatever we are consuming today to keep us healthy, may evolve themselves so that humans cannot grow and eat them. May be the chickens will lay eggs that may not be edible. May be that will starve humans to extinction.
Himanshu bhaiya is trying to make some good videos with editing and of course arguments.
This guy suboor is quite strong in his ideas, though he is wrong
True!! Nobody wrong here everybody has opinion
Suboor is of different league man!!!
Nah he is a clown
Recently Professor dave tore him to pieces
Go watch the video.
He doesnt understand evolution, he is just a clueless creationist
He also debated james fodor, james fodor owned him
He never debated in moderndaydebates lol he was invited few times never accpted
ie sophisticated microprocessor (more's law) are existing because of some external identity not by us.
If Evolution is the fact Can We say that we are evolving still?????
YES we are still evolving but at a very very slow pace
Yes...for example your 3rd molar tooth...
@@farmanmirza786 emm What is happening with that?
You are doing good work
React to more of his videos especially on drawanism. He is master of that
आपने दुर्भाग्य शब्द प्रयोग किया
अथिस्ट ये सब प्रयोग नहीं कर सकते है
6:47 Do you think that we as humans are still evolving... if yes, then is there any evidence?
Haan bhai. Ham indo aryans me lactose tolerance hi kafi bada evidence hain
The Bajau are traditionally nomadic and seafaring, and survive by collecting shellfish from the sea floor. Scientists studying the effect of this lifestyle on their biology found their spleens were larger than those of related people from the region
You can watch the video by "BE SMART" on 'Are we still evolving?'
@@itsoblivion8124that's adaptation not evolution.
@@sariyasaham6997 The whole purpose of evolution is to keep on surviving through adaptation, isn't it ? What do you expect from evolution - to grow an extra pair of legs even when you don't need them?
@@sariyasaham6997evolution is essentially the culmination of numerous adaptations over time.
Don't argue scientifically it's simple Intelligent design were created by creator who was in turn was created by a creator who was in turn was created by a creator.. infinity. It's as simple as that and it was know to us in 6th century why not in the first century ?you know Why? Don't ask only believe.
well i could argue with reference to advaita vedanta that the universe itself is pure consciousness , it manifests itself again and again and again ...infinity , but do i know that for a fact in any frame of reference , again im not disrespecting it as i find the idea quite interesting , but i dont believe in it because i dont have any explanation to it in my frame of reference,hence simply , i dont know
Creator of a creator leads argument to infinite regress which is not possible. Vimoh himself says it many times. Had infinite regress been possible then nothing would exist. Therefore the buck stops at an uncaused cause, an uncreated creator.
God has a design, he/she is complex but God don't need designer 😅.
Everything can't just pop up, there has to be creator, but God don't need creator 😅
I don't understand these religions logic
This man is creating an illusion to keep people locked in their delusion.
These guys put so much efforts in production, little did they knew that a man would just hit record and take a piss on their content.
@@ThoughtfulVoyagerwassup bro I'm an immature kid , do you have any media by which we could talk so that you could tell me things from which I could learn from because it's hard for me to understand some words sometimes, although Vijay does a good job in translating and putting it in a very simple way but I thought I could learn from more atheists ?
@@ThoughtfulVoyager🗿 not lying, just emptied my b@lls , now you cannot perform your malicious intent on my nuts car
@@ThoughtfulVoyagerbro didn't reply
@@ThoughtfulVoyager I commented from a different device , you didn't reply , I'm an immature kid
@@ThoughtfulVoyager I guess you can do it again for the last time
👍👍♥️♥️♥️
Imagine jab BCI tech se log telepathically connect ho jayenge, religious logo ko kitna regret karenge 🤭
In my case, he is right, main god ko manana hi nahi chahta. Agar god ko man liya to wo to tumhe nark me hi bhejega jis terah ke karm hai. Agar wo nahi bhejega to to dusare dharm wale god to pakka nark bhej denge, kyoki unako to nahi mane.
Agar god ko manoge hi nahi, to ko god tumhe judge hi nahi karega. Tum apni marji se kisi god ke pas bhi ja kar, swarg keliye appeal kar sakte ho. Isliye nahi manoge to marne ke bad swarg jane ka jyada probability hai.
More videos please like this
How can i call him?contact him?
Bhai Random mutation = chance. Moreover cells have an ability to destroy itself incase mutation occurs. And still if mutation cells survive, it leads to cancer not ability to swim or run fast.
Mutated cells nahi, genetic mutation ki baat ki ja rahi hain.
@@sai6118 Bhai mere cells mein mutation genetic mutation ki wajah se hi hota hai. Jab bhi kaha jata hai ki any cell has mutation, it means it has a genetic mutation or a genetic anamoly.
Since everyone is talking about evolution, i have a more important question why was only humans / homosapiens able to develop such a complex brain. Can other animals achieve our level of consciousness ?why not.
P.S: I strongly agree with his idea that even if we were created by someone it's more likely that we are the byproduct (un-necessarily results )of this vast universe.
Why only humans is a flawed question. I could also ask why only blue whale evolved to be the largest animal on earth, or why only ants evolved to have the highest population. Evolution does not have an end goal. Small changes happen, and the changes that are useful for the organism at that moment end up persisting. Others die out. Eventually all the small changes accumulate into something very different.
You don't know anything about Human evolution please study it... Because homosapiens k alawa bhi bahut si prajati thi humans ki...
If you read up on evolution, you'd get the answer. I recommend it.
Original video ka title kya hai.
Mereko mil nahi raha.
"Hardest Atheism Questions answered in 1 minute. Biology debunks Atheism"
Like if you want vimoh to make a video on dr zakir naik and his arguments because he is very popular among Muslims😂
He is famous for Inter-religious debates (Comparative religion).
He's most of time in religion debates not on atheist debate.
@@sheikhaftab8510jab khuda apni gand poke karta h science me to science gand ka taufa kabul kar leta h to theist ko bura lag jata h
😂😂😂😂
@@sheikhaftab8510bhai baat ye h ki god chahe kisi religion ka ho wo science me g**nd poke karta h to science taufa kabool kar leta h phir theist logo ki tashreef me pain hota h 😂😂
❤
It takes few percent of life to accept truth of your childhood lie. Maybe it will take few percent of humanity's existence to accept this theory. This few percent would be around 1000 of years.
No one created universe
It’s not about achi presentation and all lmao. He has done debates in person as well as live and also did long livestreams in the past talking, discussing and answering questions about various topics including evolution.
Disagree, present your argument but don’t misrepresent.
And he lost all the debates..
Specially his debate with James fodor lol
And he doesnt understand evolution, he used bullshit Philosophy to debunk scientific evidence.
Since when did philosophy started to trump evidence? Lol
For clueless muslims with no scientific knowledge, he is a great man
But in the scientific community he is just a clown
Bring him to moderndaydebates with a good biologist
I'm pretty sure he wouldn't debate considering what James fodor did to him in a debate lmao
Problem of vimoh!
1. How life started? If it is produce randomly then, we can say evolution occurred randomly. But every geo chemist deny on pridomial soup, miller and urey theory.
Evolution and Abiogenesis are two different things.
@@vimoh Yes, abinogenesis is hypothesis. And Evolution is true, but subur's point is all about Neo-Darwinism.
If you prove beginning of life without creator, Neo Darwinism will be proved automatically.
Evolution by natural selection stands proved already. Origin of life is a different matter.
@@vimoh "Natural selection" is the confusing term,
1. So is nature intelligent?
2. Is nature not intelligent?
How nature become such intelligent, that it can produce life from pridomial soup(hypothesis) and making random experiment and intelligent human is produced.
And if nature perform random experiment, then where is pre human animal which time to become man will come tomorrow(because it ia random).
@@vimoh If nature perform selection /evolution randomly, then why is not random.
Where is random order? Where is pre human Animal those time to being Human will come tomorrow / next week.
Australopithecus to homo sapiens race need to random. All the pre human can not reach in same time.
Please do collab with bioshala🙏
Vimoh bhai are u Maharashtran??
No he is oria
2:56 Bhaii kabhi ye baat bol mat dena scientists k saamne
Have a look at this debunk video .
Paradox institute debunked forest's video.
Video name:
Biology of Sex: Detailed Analysis of Forrest Valkai's "Sex and Sensibility"
I personally think that they did pretty well to debunk it
What about the source of impermanent consciousness life cannot be a nothing. Impermanent lifeforms can come out of a permanent source or else even impermanence is not possible. For threads to exist there needs to be cotton. For painting to exist a background sheet has to be there. For movie pictures to exist a screen has to be there.
I assume you will take it to,
For universe to exist a God has to be there,
Now for a GOD to exist who has to be there?
The universe exists.
@@vimoh universe is matter so it cannot be the background on which another matter exists. Most scientists are now strongly feeling that there has to be something behind time- space for time- space to exist.
The argument that the universe, being matter, cannot be the background for another form of matter commits the composition fallacy. Just because the universe consists of matter doesn't mean it cannot contain or be the background for other elements or phenomena. Additionally, stating that 'most scientists' believe something without providing evidence or references falls into the argument from authority fallacy. In reality, the nature of space-time and the possibility of something beyond it are still areas of active research and debate in cosmology and theoretical physics. Various theories and hypotheses exist, but definitive conclusions are yet to be reached.@@Yogakshema_vahamyaham
I have a question, if you accept Darwin's theory, then why is evolution stopped.?
It's not
Evolution is continuous process the question is why we can't see clearly because it takes thousands of years . best example , human organs which are no longer needed e.g.Appendix ,Vestigial organs ,human hair
Why do these exist because our ancestors need these organs
It isn't. We're still evolving. All life around us is. The process happens over generations, so it's more observable in species that have shorter lives, like fruit flies etc, who you can study multiple generations of in the matter of a few years.
Looking forward to it.. 👍
Sir aap muslim speaker pe reaction video banao
Sab pe banate h ye
@@DiVa-ks2jg mera matlab tha zada tar
Absolutely 💯
I'm the god and I created the world. Who don't want to believe me they will Going to hell.
Abhi sab mujhe pranaam karo bow down
🤣
Every cult summed up in a single comment
@@LordDajjal432 hag diya tumane
Bruhh talks about personality 🤣🤣🤣
You are making a mistake. Evolution is a random process.
Have you heard of evolutionary algorithm, cross over and mutation.
Beside the goal of evolution is to survive in the nature. its not about perfection, its about survival. So, this survival nature gives some guidance while selecting gene pool but the new gene creation process is random
So evolution cannot answer followings therefore it is still a unproven theory. it is not widely acccepted by the scientific community nor rejected specially in the light of fine tuning and creative sign exist in the nature.
1. Evolution cannot answer how random mutation and cross over of gene which have extremely low chance of creating something that would meet the demand of circumstances present always results in something that works. For instance, we have not found any fossils of any animal which malformed. Every evolutionary creation is always well formed. we never seen three eyes, one eyesanimals.
2. genetic variation that exist among humans and other complex life forms are too complex to evolve in such a short period of few million years. Remember no sign of human before 300 thousands years then just appeared in Africa. then evolve over a short period of time
3. Consciousness and rational thinking. how random evolutionary process emanate rational, logical process. its just does not make sense.
4. the initiation of life cannot be answered by evolution
whatever, evolution is not a good theory to answer the origin of life. its for sure.
I would not bet my money in favor of this
In theory of evolution, do we have evidence that the mutations are random and not done by God?
Do u have evidence that mutations are done by God ? And yes we have evidence that mutations are random
@@aaronhemrom545 I don't have evidence that God is doing mutations, now can you please give me evidence that mutations are random?
@@owaiskhan7047 Mutations are changes in the DNA sequence that can be caused by various factors, such as errors during DNA replication or exposure to mutagens like radiation or certain chemicals. These mutations are considered random because they occur regardless of whether they would be beneficial, harmful, or neutral to an organism's survival or reproduction. The process of natural selection then acts on these random mutations, determining whether they become more or less common in a population based on their effects on an organism's ability to survive and reproduce in its environment.
@@aaronhemrom545 whatever reasons you mentioned can also be a part of God's master plan, according to me you can't call mutations random until you disprove existence of God. I think it is more appropriate to say that mutations happen but we don't know whether they are random or done by God, being agnostic about this too should not be a big problem for atheists.
@@owaiskhan7047 things don't work by assumption like maybe someone did......we need enough frame of reference and proofs to support that statement whether it can be proven or not..... we have reason why it happens we have enough reason and evidence to prove it's random and we have zero evidence to prove that God did it....and when it comes to appropriate I don't think it's appropriate being agnostic about flying unicorn and and god like pasta in earth
you leave what you do not know to god like you do not know creation of universe correctly this is why you say god created and you do not know what is afterlife so you say heaven and hell and whenever you come to know you create law and leave god
there is a lot of science in this universe to create the stage and does god see the good and evil in this stage ?
What is effective- hand or prayer ?
Bhai to one cellular cell aye kaha se
Also ask him cell ke ander jo genetics information to evolve itself by mutation, woh genetic coding kaha se aa gayi jo ki ek protein ke liye code krne lag gayi, this is called minimum gene concept.
@@rajhasan147nahi pata yeh uska answer hoga obviously, tumhara kya answer hai?
@@scoobyaura-fr6dm i believe that God is behind this.
@@rajhasan147 if it's your belief I can't do anything about it , All I can say is extraordinary claims require Extraordinary evidence , Your belief doesn't make up the reality and others opinions , I believe that there is a proper reasoning behind it yet to be found , till then I can clearly say that "I don't know"
@@scoobyaura-fr6dm there will not be any explanation of creation of this great universe without God.
Sidha debate karo sir agar really apke pas fact h
This time vimoh lose sorry.
Because he didn't mentioned shouting Allahu akhbar before big bang 🤣🤣🤣
If anybody have some mind he would conclude that this entire universe is not like atheists claim.
Let’s say there is a god, who says that he is good? There are children dying everyday and your god doesn’t do anything about it. So either god isn’t good or he isn’t omnipotent or he doesn’t care.
These guys are actually foul enough to say "karma" and justify children dying in horrible conditions like lithium mining and war
@@devendraSingh19aug no, but it (god) is no benevolent entity from the persepctive of us sapiens, unlike what we sapiens ourselves claim. Emphasis on us humans claiming that it is benevolent.
karma wale sabse chtiye hote
Environment nein machli direct kese a agaya? Basic class 12ki ncert mein straight likha hyy- "we have no clear idea how the first self-replicating metabolic capsule of life arose"
That's abiogenesis. Not evolution. All gene-based species evolved from other species. Besides, the fish was an example to illustrate a point.
Even your existence can be traced back to the first dust spec which came together to form earth......
Did you ever read recent papers?
Or you just read 1400 year old book and 50 yrs old NCERT?
Evolution slow aur random hoti hai, machli ke sirf 1 aur 2 generation me nahi hoti.
I did mention generations.
@@vimohthe example you gave was not clear about that.
@@sariyasaham6997this was an example in its simplest form possible for laymen, not a thesis paper on evolution.
@@ryuchic462 then the laymen is wrong
@@sariyasaham6997 I said he explained it for laymen... Not laymen explained it
he has no idead of what he is talking about (vimol). Soobur is on an another level. the interest of watching this video died the very moment he said EVOLUTION. 🤦♂🤦♂LOL
O BHAI !!!! suboor makes 3 options and he makes rest of his claims on tht but ye vimol to bhai kuch oor hi duniya em haay
Someone who reads only one book has merely any logic
"Now there is three ways that somebody can explain biological design.
Biological design is either the result of chance, or it's necessity, it's just meant to be that way.
Or there is a God, there is a designer"
Two of the three options that suboor is giving to explain how biological design works are
1. Everything is based on chance
2. It's just meant to be
Paraphrasing what vimoh says about the first option- Suboor uses chance based to explain evolution. But that's not what evolution is. Evolution is not chance based, no one ever said that it is chance based. The research and data that we have now goes to show that species develop new mutations every now and then and whether that mutation is carried forward in their gene or not depends on how their habitat responds to it.
The second point sounds juvenile, since it tells you to just accept what there is without looking for any meaning behind it.
I think Mr. Suboor just added that alternative to make it look like he is offering more quantity of options, which in reality he is not, considering the fact that neither atheists nor theists are willing to accept things as they are without looking for any answers.
In fact the atheists are actually more inclined to look for answers because they don't rely on older, outdated arguments to support their understanding. The rigidity of religion and its reliance on uncontested and seemingly "undeniable truths" Is what makes it unable to answer questions posed by agnostics and atheists.
Chacha ek ek line ko explain karke kitna fallacy karte ho yar wo kuch aur kehna chah rahe tm kuch ulta jawab de rahe
Species में बदलाव क्यूँ आते हैं ? Mutations को भी कोई actuate करता है।
We believe there is a design by which existence of species is decided.
Sometimes random sometimes the necessity to survive........
*Subboor ahmed is a Jalebi-man...makes jalebis around arguments only to twist that Argument to a different topic He's familiar with, Just So that he can beat you...these muslim apologists are the most dishonest people you will ever come across.*
bruh still thinks we're living in Darwin's paradigm, wake up bruh, saboor has already dealt with the neo darwinian arguments which you can't even comprehend yet.
Send me a link to his peer reviewed paper and I will be happy to read it.
17:49 study scriptures and do research rather than being ignorant .
Study science and do research. Instead of being ignorant.
Hey @sariyasaham6997 great work man why don't you join him for a live debate and show this foolish atheist proof you have found?!
@@vimoh I'm studying science I don't see any problem here. Whereas you are arrogant and ignorant at the same time.
@@Shubuu17 Why don't you take a look at the reaction videos between Smile2Jannah and Vimoh. Not only you'll find who is foolish but also misleading and lier
@@vimohI'm studying science and I don't see any problem with that.
On the contrary you are arrogant and ignorant to study scriptures(maybe other than hinduism).
None of your argument is strong, you are just assuming things and making it fact to reject God.
Atleast they are are Args
Religious people states everything
@@mijana961 are you talking about religion or God here?
@@ThoughtfulVoyager yes this too evidence based assumption that in a single prokaryotic cell, all molecules combined and RNA formed then DNA which has an information to code for a protein. where did you get minimum set of gene before first cell? Remember that information cannot come itself and what is the deciding factor of coding according to you at the initial stage? Is nature deciding the codings by combining molecules? Is the nature putting these information to the RNA and DNA? Is nature conscious?
@@ThoughtfulVoyager brother every scientist can make a story saying its an evidence based theory but remember that they will tell you how it happened, they won't tell you who did it or what was the cause behind that. They can never answer the question that who decided the certain molecules combine to form a gene for coding which has an information. As you do coding in computer creating an information same as who combined the molecules in a certain way to code for a gene which has information to make certain proteins? Don't refer me to a video because they will tell me how did it happen, tell me who did it?
@@ThoughtfulVoyager have you ever studied molecular biology? Coding system in a DNA? How some molecules or compounds like adnine guanine thymine arranged together to have a information i.e gene which can make a certain proteins, tell me where this information come from? What the deciding factor? If its natural then is nature this much conscious and this much intelligence that it knows what is good or bad for survival, how nature got this ability to identify the better way of survival or evolve the universe in the best measurement. Tell me about minimal genome that is how the first cell got the minimum set of genes to survive at the first time? Just don't say natural, explain it. When I'm saying that any scientist can make up a story evidence based is only about this perticular topic about the first cell evolution bcoz there were many theories which were rubbish and disproved by scientists. Also Dawkins believes that this could be the alien who planted the genes or first cell. There is book called There is God by Antony Flew who was a staunch atheist till 95yo then he admitted by looking at the DNA structure and the coding and the mechanism, he found there is signature of some higher intelligence in DNA. I recommend you to read that book.
Bhai you blasted man , salute to your logics and rational thinking . But i only dont agree with you is on reservation based on caste.
Sir please upload more like this
Astrology ke bare me banao..
Also don't just judge too quickly
Christian Muslims Hindu ek hi khet ki muli hai. Sirf bechne ka trika alag hai.
Jai Bhim
Ab pakka koi aake likhega RELIJAN AND DRAMA ARE DIFFERENT 😢
😢😢@@electrondynamics9721
@Liyakat-nl8vp are saar Buddhism nastik philosophy hai saar
@Liyakat-nl8vp scriptures are controversial saar but Bhagwan Buddha is different to scriptures saaar
Nobody worship Buddha saar but praise him saar
Worshipping is to Cosmic energy saar.
You don't worship human but praise saar.
Pta nhi kyu mujhe Aisa lg rha h ki hindu muslim aur Cristians ki trh khi ye Jai bheem wale bhi koi cult na shuru kr de 🥲
Vimoh : aham bhramasmi 😂 muje god maan lo
Thank you vimoh sir