One of the reasons I am very questioning of GMOs is, farmers in canada having to destroy their crops because GMO seeds have blown onto there fields and corporations claim a theft has been committed. If it is just about helping people then ok grow away, but it is not. This issue is about taking control of a staple of life, food. Address this issue and I will support it.
Hey climate guys- Earth warms and ice caps melt- 1.Billionaires will find their beach front mansions under water-new beach is inland where poor people live- billionaires must pay poor people huge amounts for the beach property- hooray for wealth redistribution 2. Sea levels rise- whale habitat increases- and their population expands- Yay for whales 3. More ocean means more fish which means more seafood for the poor - Go poor people!! 4. Expansion of sea surface means more rainfall and more fresh water-Down with droughts!! 5. More rainfall means deserts across the globe become arable farmland and we have a huge surplus of low cost food- great for previously starving, but now overweight Africans. 6. melted glaciers mean Siberia, N. Canada, Antarctica, Greenland and Iceland are now open for people to move and live there- Yes to homesteading. 7. Huge reserves of oil and natural gas are discovered under Antarctica- oil becomes cheaper than water- Mid east oil is no longer important and conflicts cease- Save the Camels!!
Fear is always of the unknown and that tactic just goes to prove they're using psy-ops tactics against people and forcing them to buy into what they don't know.
How did I miss this? Why NOW? The first time I have met this wise man, albeit only vicariously on the interweb. All the points he has raised, I was taught at primary school, in 1952 to 54. Has the world forgotten these truths? Its not called "The carbon Cycle" because it sounds pretty. By the time I got to High School as a 13 year old, and completed my first year, started learning to think, it was even MORE obvious, as we groped our way through the mists, learning the terms in use. The end result? Why are people arguing about this? Can taxing us alter the climate? The only way to do THAT, is to pay off the ONE climate driver. THE SUN!!!!
This is pretty good but one point... it's not intellectually honest to say temperatures have been flat for 20 years or whatever. When I take a look at the data, invariably and for some unknown reason, the chosen starting point is typically an outlier. The temperature anomaly sometime around 1998 is often used. Better approach is to use something like a 50 year moving average to smooth out variation. There's no real pause. 20 years is way too short a time frame anyway.
GMOs can be owned and the food system can be a way to control that way. It's anti food sovereignty as they have their food copyrighted. If it was not after 5 years like a real patient then why not.
The truth lies somewhere in-between. There are lots of flaws and cognitive distortions on both extremes of these arguments and I hear Mr. Moore positing many important facts, but also skipping over some complexities. Both sides do it. We would all do well to be more impartial, better listeners, and more ardent in going after the Truth and seeking solutions that bring us more in-synch with our planet's processes.
There is the legal problem that GMO crops tend to spread their genes to the neighbor's field with the same non-GMO crop but next year their seeds are not allowed because of GMO genes in the new crop. Monsanto then sues the neighbor for steeling GMO property. Another problem is that the success of GMO in the third world is so overwhelming everybody signs-up for the new stuff. But many local crops are so local that they are unique and when lost because of total replacement there is no way back. Then the GMO is suddenly 2-3 times more expensive and the local farmers are not savvy enough to see all legal and financial consequences of GMO seed monopoly. If Monsanto sees only half a case they sue you and the legal team has endless resources. So no I don't oppose to GMO but they tend to employ crops that have had substantial modification through breeding techniques and it was always possible to use these crops as starting material for experiments to get even new properties. The seeds or plants are for sale and their genus is property to sell to other farmers but it is not like a patent. It is more like public property. But no Monsanto takes these highly cultivated varieties and makes them GMO and claims patent. If they would start with a wild original and change that to any GMO to call it their property I would agree but this is snatching from a public sharing system and it undermines the sharing principal.
I just love his interview where Patrick Schilling for monsato about how perfectly safe roundup is....Haha. If he wants his opinions to count he needs to publish some papers, not just offer his opinions. Anyone can give opinions.
Roundup the Herbicide is a different issue and completely different animal than GMO seeds. I don't recall hearing him say anything about the chemical herbicide or it's safety (or lack thereof).
Moore is a paid shill for corporate interests. Just because he was in Greenpeace for 5 years doesn't make him a saint and he's definitely not a scientist. He downplays global warming and even juggles dates and numbers to argue that we saved the planet with CO2. He's a joke. Too bad so many suckers fall for his BS just because they really want to hear good news.
Most greetings Canadian and USA peoples -- So much happy your weather is good. Here in the Sudan getting too hot and dry to live. We have been searching for a new homeland. We appreciate your generous hospitality and will be leaving here as we are able. We are many. Do work good for you. Allahu Akbar الله أكبر
Ok I got my head around the climate thing a while ago Still having trouble with the Monsanto one But a real big one is vaccines,I don’t believe in the amount of vaccines they have now ,I worked in a cheese factory and I’ve witnessed how things like listeria can out smart us,our chemicals would get stronger and every couple of yrs we would have to change the chemicals cause they didn’t work anymore,several occasions we had to shut the factory down and we would spend one to two weeks just cleaning and swabbing until we got x amount of days clear of listeria and all food product recalled. Viruses and bacteria mutate quickly and do this to survive,I’m worried that 50 to 100 yrs down the track vaccines become like antibiotics where the over use has cause a few problems. Are we weakening our natural immune systems by using lots of vaccines and will bugs( viruses) become stronger to survive. I’m with him completely on the climate crap cause I have followed this for so long. I’m an ex leftie who believed in everything told by msm but I question everything now. So I’m still not sure about Monsanto and more so about vaccines. So much misinformation out there. I’m also a big believer in if one side is pushing something so strongly and label the other side questioning it all ( like msm telling everyone to just get your jabs) and we know how the msm pushes hatred of Trump and weapons of mass destruction to start the war against saddam,so when they name call anyone or push anything then I’m like I don’t believe that’s how distrusting I am of msm now,cause we all know how they push this human made climate change stuff. So personally I wish dr Patrick Moore had just stuck to the climate subject. Again I’m if msm says it’s good or just do it or pushes one thing while labelling the other side something nasty like deniers or anti or nazis or racists then I just can’t believe them. Sorry.
I'm pro vax but not in the current climate. They forcing an experimental drug on us, no thanks. I don't trust the companies that Patrick does, but his views are worth hearing.
During March 2015 in an interview by French investigative journalist Paul Moreira, on French television station Canal+, Moore was asked about the safety of the herbicide glyphosate. Moore told Paul Moreira that one "could drink a whole quart of it" without any harm. When Moore was challenged to drink a glass of the weedkiller, he refused, saying "I'm not an idiot" and "I'm not stupid" before ending the interview.
My thoughts exactly. If the IPCC talked about the positive effects of humans on the environment (cleaner air, water, restoring the carbon cycle, etc.), then they'd be out of a job! The IPCC's corruption is inherent by their very NEED to cast a negative light on humans.
The Heartland Institute is an American conservative and libertarian public policy think tank known for its rejection of the scientific consensus on climate change and the negative health impacts of smoking.This is who Moore works for
Aren't they also funded by the Koch Brothers? Like how PragerU and the Daily Wire are funded by the Wilks Brothers. God, what is with morally bankrupt conservative oil barons and being brothers?
There may or may not be any problem with GMOs but Monsanto have developed these plants in order to expand the use of their product Glyphosphate which has to be the worst chemical input used by agriculture today and traces of which can be found everywhere from the food we eat to our bodies
Does anyone have the chart he refers to saying that global temperatures have remained flat apart from one el nino year? The charts ive found show an exponential warming.
And from viewers like me :-) Moore is really good but he should focus more on the Co2 lag and the forcing that never happened. Euan Mears is really good at analyzing graphs from the vostok core that implement the ~800 year lag.
Please, can you explain to us, somehow how the GMO is not deteimental. I notice that this has taken hold in me as well, but can you recommend..more layman litterature available to understand more of this? It does not really help me much to say it is stupid. Thank you.
My current favourite fantasy: a public debate, in which Dr Moore is pitted against (say) a panel consisting of Greta Thunberg, King Charles, the Pope, and Jennifer Aniston. Normally, I'm against Blood Sports - but in this case..................
I am sorry, but I do not believe in the power of Monsanto as improving on creation! The problem with Vitamin A is a problem of ignorance about WHITE RICE. Brown whole rice contains Vitamin A in the husk. If all the cultures used whole grain rice there would not be the Vitamin A problem.
I would argue the intention of the genetic modification. When that comes down to creating a product that relies on, in fact, requires you to buy other products, is that good?
I love the free spirit of Patrick Moore but I think he is partly wrong on GMO. GMO in itself is not necessarily good or bad. Indeed the seed is probably noy going to harm you. But Bayer Monsanto for instance makes seeds so that the plants grow mostly to be glyphosate based herbicide resistant. That is harmful as we now know these herbicides cause cancer and contain heavy metals like cadmium and arsenic. Also the seed are sold for one year and monsanto strives on suing farmers. Due to these more than 250 000 farmers, particularly in India, have taken their own lives. Also GMO is made to be grown in monoculture, which has very harmful effects on wildlife. The inventors of GMO tech say themselves that GMO doesn't increase yields. The public is not always right, like with climate, but it's not always wrong like the 66 countries that highly regulate GMO.
ponch0partout yeah I’m with you my jury is out on this But I go a step further I am very sceptic about vaccines and I have a few reasons,I’ve seen listeria in my factory that I worked in mutate and we had to stop production on a few occasions and spend weeks just cleaning and over my 17 yrs I’ve seen them have to change chemicals due to them no longer working against listeria etc and then also antibiotics not working like they use to. I’m concerned that in 50/100 yrs time we find we have weakened our natural immune systems due to vaccines and that flus and chicken pox mutate to become to strong for even the best vaccine. So I am very concerned about vaccines. I was once a die hard global warming freak head but I know this is lies cause I didn’t just start following it yesterday but almost four decades again and none of their prediction models have come true,we haven’t run out of resources like they said we would and seas haven’t risen to the point of us swimming for it and the ozone is all good again now.In fact I was such a believer in this and because of the over population thing I did my own personal bit thinking I was helping to save the human race,I didn’t have children but now I realise my mistake but it’s to late for me but I’m worried that the kids of today are gonna be so scared that there is nothing to live for they just give up on everything cause the push today is even worse then it was back in the 80/90 ,today they even teach this bs in schools but back in the 80/90 we only learnt it from the tv. So yeah I’m worried about the kids of today and the fear tactics that are been pushed at every younger ages,politics moving into schools. It’s really very disgusting actually.
Wow very interesting, especially how this guy says so many half truths and to “validate” his perspectives. This perspective is from a psychological one, as for climate change, most of what was predicted has not happened, but are we polluting our plant, our home, yes absolutely!
Yeah... Dr. Moore, there is nothing more scary that a company like Monsanto being the intellectual owner of all seeds sold to farmers, while farmers eradicate all non gmo alternatives.
Go look at research of trapped air in ice and do some research in interglacials and what they found... then come back... 😂 then go listen to what this man says 😅 this man is words, no data.
Currently most climate science deniers brand themselves as 'skeptics' but they tend to have zero desire to critically look at what their idols are presenting and their backgrounds. Below are issues that the interviewer failed to mention and the video description leaves out. Patrick Moore www.desmogblog.com/patrick-moore What President Trump, Fox and Breitbart Are Not Saying About Climate Science Denier Patrick Moore www.desmogblog.com/2019/03/12/trump-tucker-carlson-fox-breitbart-climate-science-denier-patrick-moore Climate Science Denier Patrick Moore Under Attack From Fellow Nuclear Energy Advocates www.desmogblog.com/2016/04/07/climate-science-denier-patrick-moore-under-attack-fellow-nuclear-energy-advocates Dr. Patrick Moore Just Misled Congress davidappell.blogspot.ca/2014/02/dr-patrick-moore-just-misled-congress.html Climate Science Denier Patrick Moore Paid by Coal Lobbyists EURACOAL To Speak To EU Officials and Members of Parliament www.desmogblog.com/2016/03/14/coal-lobbyists-euracoal-paid-patrick-moore-dinner-climate-science-deniers-eu-officials-and-european-parliament-members
@@tommy-jy5ig - Many people believe their own shit just as Donald Trump believes in the thousands of lies and distortions he constantly spews. They live in their own alternative reality.
@@tommy-jy5ig - I don't label people such things to explain why they are other than us. I believe that a person can be absolutely confident that they are right and good but that later historians can judge them to be just the opposite. I believe the human ego plays a role in reassuring us that we are good. I do not buy into the concept that bad things must come from people who have ill intent.
Whales were not saved by Greenpeace. It was oil, both as fuel & for making plastic that saved the whales. Whaling started to decline as soon as kerosene was used for lamps instead of whale oil.
The man that says we need liquefied coal in the future as fuel, also the man says he with greenpeace was the cause of the clean air of western cities? Wasnt that the move from coal to gas?.... 😅
GMO seeds are not allowed to be kept by farmers to plant the next year, thereby limiting farmer’s profits by following centuries of farming practices - that is what the Indians are saying about those seeds! 7:23
This is a very strange interview. He says many things very quickly seemingly to support a general point but he doesn’t go into any detail about them to provide evidence. Example: “Nobody died from the Fukushima disaster.” Besides the fact that it is not entirely false, he makes the wrong conclusions from it. The low number of people who died is due to very efficient evacuation from the areas most likely affected by the radiation OR the possibility of radiation exposure. Since they were evacuated quickly how can you conclude that therefore nuclear reactors are safe? Which is what he seems to be hinting at? It is a very strange line of argument he is using.
Anyone notice the sponsors of this channel? Funded by oil and gas? 😆 Another piece of oil and gas propaganda. Could have told ya with a channel called "conversations that matter." Cringe!!
Everything good comes from and is controlled by God - mortal men work for Him, or against Him whether they know this or not - I reckon this explains why Christianity is the way to the Light - or so it seems to many Englishmen of my age. It is beyond mind-blowing to consider this... T S Eliot did a good job of trying to grasp the mysteries that we face daily - and will never know, perhaps, in The Four Quartets. So, sometimes, when I hear some dreadful paid-for scientist or imbecilic presenter babbling on I put this poem on in my head - or a piece of Vaughan William's - and I remember the sky and I actually come alive again!
Moore is right about GMO's and nuclear power here, but he's also involved in the misinformation campaigns about AGW. The interviewer gives him a free ride as he doesn't seem to know either, which is a major problem as Moore rarely allows himself to be questioned by knowledgeable people over his anti-AGW position.
As for GMO's....so how can Mr. Moore explain why so many farmers in India committed suicide when their GMO seeds failed to produce successfully? Is he also saying that Glyphosate is ok to use in agriculture? Cannot follow his logic about GMO's. When a farmer plants GMO seeds, those seeds will not be able to reproduce again, unlike heirloom or non-GMO seeds. So farmers are forced to continue to buy the GMO seeds. Who is paying Mr. Moore to make his claims?
Comments pertinent to Galileo Galilei are not correct. His theory concerning Heliocentrism: that the Sun - and not the Earth was the center of our solar system was not arbitrarily condemned. He taught his theory in the Universities of Bologna and Turin. And, in the assessment of Hilaire Belloc, an very militant Catholic apologist: "It was splendidly applauded in the schools." Galileo however, quarrelsomely, taught his theory as if it were fact. Which, at that time, it was not. When his theory was proven correct, the Church accepted it without qualification. Moore's statement that Galileo was held under house arrest for the rest of his life is also misleading. House arrest as we understand is not at all what house arrest was like at that time. Galileo could leave his house, he could visit friends, attend Mass, and was, to an considerable extent, free and without administrative and procedural restraints. Even several centuries later, the non - denominational Protestant mystic, John Bunyan, was also held under house arrest by the protestant authorities in England. But, (but), they still allowed him to present himself in the public domain. And to preach his doctrines and beliefs which "the authorities" of the time considered heretical. Patrick Moore's comments pertinent to plastics, and GMO foods, and seeds are refreshing and candid. And honest. He may however, consider re - reading his history pertinent to Galileo. And possibly, John Bunyan. As well.
This guy has lost it. I wonder how he feels about spraying glyphosate on the forests. What part of BC is he looking at when he says everything looks fine. Has he seen the clear cuts? Just trying to stay in front of a camera. Monsanto loves this guy, and Union Carbide, and DOW and ...
Chernobyl was caused entirely by idiot humans. Technican's who were NOT nuclear scientist decided to try an experiment. Had normal operating procedures been followed, NOTHING would have happened.
Clearly he's all over the climate issue, but on everything else - GMOs, health - he's totally focused on narrow outcome measures. That's as sinful in science as making stuff up - more insidious in fact, because you can hide a lot of evil that way (and he does, to wit GMOs). I remember when the "Green movement" was the Ecology movement. It means you have to look at the whole tapestry and not get hung up on the individual threads. It was a counter to the compartmentalisation in politics that is so damaging. It seems Moore likes compartmentalisation, but in an ecological model you can't afford to do that. He certainly lost much of his audience when he called anti-vaxxers "stupid". Dear oh dear, stick to what you've studied, I suggest.
Your breaks for advertisements are ridiculous. If you are in a conversation, it's very rude to be interrupted every few minutes. Cop on and get rid of those interruptions midway it the conversation.
Why doesn't the interviewer do some basic research before interviewing someone. He looks to be bereft of even the basics of science! Even basic chemistry describes acids, bases and pH. What about Litmus tests?
Why does he have to have such immutable opinions in areas he has no expertise in, like gmos, vaccines or radiation? How can you generally and categorically say gmos are safe? How would you know? So it doesn't matter what we modify in genes, it will always all be fine to consume? I guess he took all his covid shots and boosters as well...
What a sad piece of propaganda. As I watched this I wonder when the lie, spin and propaganda would be challenged. If one doesn't ask the real questions and challenge fairy tales I suppose it matters.
gOOGLEmyBALLS THINKS i am stupid!!! :Global warming Global warming is the long-term rise in the average temperature of the Earth's climate system. It is a major aspect of climate change and has been demonstrated by direct temperature measurements and by measurements of various effects of the warming. Global warming and climate change are often used interchangeably. Wikipedia"
This is a guy that shuffled back and forth trying desperately to be noticed, then along came Greta Thunberg who stole his thunder became a global figure in climate change, sad sad old man the jealousy is just too painful to watch.
Meh....This stooge has long been exposed as nothing more than a "scientist for hire"......His being "outed" by a french journalist is epic and hilarious !! Search - patrick moore glyphosate for a good laugh!!
"stooge", "Scientist for hire", "outed by French journalist"; personals slurs rather than arguments. You may be perfectly correct in your belief that he lacks credibility. However, you have done nothing to substantiate this.
Dr. Moore is one of the best minds we have regarding climate and ecological matters. Thanks so much. Would love to see part 2!
What an amazing gentleman Patrick Moore is! Logic, logic, logic and yet they deny him!
What an big fat liar Patrick Moore is! Distortions, fabrications and outright lies and yet they deny him!
@@MrDorbel 🥱
Liquefied coal in the future is logic?😅
👍👍
Live long & prosper, Dr. Moore!!
Great man👍
Just love Patrick Moore, so much logic in one person.
Mee too !
Love from Norway !
@@nusse1945 og Danmark😉
This is all so interesting!
I agree. It amazing me so much nonsense and fluff can be packed together.
I'll have a glass of glyphosate on the rocks please! Make that a double
More of conversations like this and faster the better. Well done and thanks.
One of the reasons I am very questioning of GMOs is, farmers in canada having to destroy their crops because GMO seeds have blown onto there fields and corporations claim a theft has been committed. If it is just about helping people then ok grow away, but it is not. This issue is about taking control of a staple of life, food. Address this issue and I will support it.
Yet we have idiots pushing a carbon tax and shutting down pipelines.Thisbshould be stopped !
Yes.
In Chernobyl an old couple who are now in their 90's never moved away. A utube blogger visited them.
Hey climate guys-
Earth warms and ice caps melt-
1.Billionaires will find their beach front mansions under water-new beach is inland where poor people live- billionaires must pay poor people huge amounts for the beach property- hooray for wealth redistribution
2. Sea levels rise- whale habitat increases- and their population expands- Yay for whales
3. More ocean means more fish which means more seafood for the poor - Go poor people!!
4. Expansion of sea surface means more rainfall and more fresh water-Down with droughts!!
5. More rainfall means deserts across the globe become arable farmland and we have a huge surplus of low cost food- great for previously starving, but now overweight Africans.
6. melted glaciers mean Siberia, N. Canada, Antarctica, Greenland and Iceland are now open for people to move and live there- Yes to homesteading.
7. Huge reserves of oil and natural gas are discovered under Antarctica- oil becomes cheaper than water- Mid east oil is no longer important and conflicts cease- Save the Camels!!
Very funny take on inland flooding
Fear is always of the unknown and that tactic just goes to prove they're using psy-ops tactics against people and forcing them to buy into what they don't know.
"The climate issue has corrupted science more than anything since the enlightenment."
Patrick Moore should be given the Order of Canada
It's great that the truth still manages to break through once in awhile.
Indeed. What we DESPERATELY need right now is a powerful 'counter-offensive' in THIS particular battle zone!!!
Outstanding interview
How did I miss this? Why NOW? The first time I have met this wise man, albeit only vicariously on the interweb.
All the points he has raised, I was taught at primary school, in 1952 to 54. Has the world forgotten these truths?
Its not called "The carbon Cycle" because it sounds pretty.
By the time I got to High School as a 13 year old, and completed my first year, started learning to think, it was even MORE obvious, as we groped our way through the mists, learning the terms in use.
The end result? Why are people arguing about this? Can taxing us alter the climate? The only way to do THAT, is to pay off the ONE climate driver.
THE SUN!!!!
This is pretty good but one point... it's not intellectually honest to say temperatures have been flat for 20 years or whatever. When I take a look at the data, invariably and for some unknown reason, the chosen starting point is typically an outlier. The temperature anomaly sometime around 1998 is often used. Better approach is to use something like a 50 year moving average to smooth out variation. There's no real pause. 20 years is way too short a time frame anyway.
on the same climate change page as Patrick, but not on GMO's.. for human & soil (earth) health vs pesticides & herbicides reasons
A true factual and accurate man with experience .
Well done show keep them coming
Watch this before it gets deleted. You're not allowed to question the status quo.
And three years later, we're still here! Why?
@@ljo642 because climate change doesn't bloody exist.
GMOs can be owned and the food system can be a way to control that way. It's anti food sovereignty as they have their food copyrighted. If it was not after 5 years like a real patient then why not.
The truth lies somewhere in-between. There are lots of flaws and cognitive distortions on both extremes of these arguments and I hear Mr. Moore positing many important facts, but also skipping over some complexities. Both sides do it. We would all do well to be more impartial, better listeners, and more ardent in going after the Truth and seeking solutions that bring us more in-synch with our planet's processes.
There is the legal problem that GMO crops tend to spread their genes to the neighbor's field with the same non-GMO crop but next year their seeds are not allowed because of GMO genes in the new crop. Monsanto then sues the neighbor for steeling GMO property.
Another problem is that the success of GMO in the third world is so overwhelming everybody signs-up for the new stuff. But many local crops are so local that they are unique and when lost because of total replacement there is no way back. Then the GMO is suddenly 2-3 times more expensive and the local farmers are not savvy enough to see all legal and financial consequences of GMO seed monopoly.
If Monsanto sees only half a case they sue you and the legal team has endless resources.
So no I don't oppose to GMO but they tend to employ crops that have had substantial modification through breeding techniques and it was always possible to use these crops as starting material for experiments to get even new properties. The seeds or plants are for sale and their genus is property to sell to other farmers but it is not like a patent. It is more like public property. But no Monsanto takes these highly cultivated varieties and makes them GMO and claims patent. If they would start with a wild original and change that to any GMO to call it their property I would agree but this is snatching from a public sharing system and it undermines the sharing principal.
That's patent laws for ya.
Golden rice is not made by Monsanto
I just love his interview where Patrick Schilling for monsato about how perfectly safe roundup is....Haha.
If he wants his opinions to count he needs to publish some papers, not just offer his opinions. Anyone can give opinions.
Roundup the Herbicide is a different issue and completely different animal than GMO seeds. I don't recall hearing him say anything about the chemical herbicide or it's safety (or lack thereof).
Moore is a paid shill for corporate interests. Just because he was in Greenpeace for 5 years doesn't make him a saint and he's definitely not a scientist. He downplays global warming and even juggles dates and numbers to argue that we saved the planet with CO2. He's a joke. Too bad so many suckers fall for his BS just because they really want to hear good news.
Most greetings Canadian and USA peoples -- So much happy your weather is good. Here in the Sudan getting too hot and dry to live. We have been searching for a new homeland. We appreciate your generous hospitality and will be leaving here as we are able. We are many. Do work good for you.
Allahu Akbar الله أكبر
Pat, you got it right on global warming, but not much else.
Yeah but you can’t control people if they are not fearful. Plus the little girl in Sweden needs something to complain about. 😝
Ok I got my head around the climate thing a while ago
Still having trouble with the Monsanto one
But a real big one is vaccines,I don’t believe in the amount of vaccines they have now ,I worked in a cheese factory and I’ve witnessed how things like listeria can out smart us,our chemicals would get stronger and every couple of yrs we would have to change the chemicals cause they didn’t work anymore,several occasions we had to shut the factory down and we would spend one to two weeks just cleaning and swabbing until we got x amount of days clear of listeria and all food product recalled. Viruses and bacteria mutate quickly and do this to survive,I’m worried that 50 to 100 yrs down the track vaccines become like antibiotics where the over use has cause a few problems. Are we weakening our natural immune systems by using lots of vaccines and will bugs( viruses) become stronger to survive.
I’m with him completely on the climate crap cause I have followed this for so long.
I’m an ex leftie who believed in everything told by msm but I question everything now.
So I’m still not sure about Monsanto and more so about vaccines.
So much misinformation out there.
I’m also a big believer in if one side is pushing something so strongly and label the other side questioning it all ( like msm telling everyone to just get your jabs) and we know how the msm pushes hatred of Trump and weapons of mass destruction to start the war against saddam,so when they name call anyone or push anything then I’m like I don’t believe that’s how distrusting I am of msm now,cause we all know how they push this human made climate change stuff.
So personally I wish dr Patrick Moore had just stuck to the climate subject.
Again I’m if msm says it’s good or just do it or pushes one thing while labelling the other side something nasty like deniers or anti or nazis or racists then I just can’t believe them. Sorry.
@xxxPassiexxx spot on.
Extinction rebellion funded by George Soros.
I'm pro vax but not in the current climate. They forcing an experimental drug on us, no thanks. I don't trust the companies that Patrick does, but his views are worth hearing.
What about Glyphosates? The problem isn't with the seeds, its with the roundup...I feel like he is talking around the issue here.
We have to use glyphosates when we can engineer or modify crops to be resistant to particular pests and weeds.
Exactly
During March 2015 in an interview by French investigative journalist Paul Moreira, on French television station Canal+, Moore was asked about the safety of the herbicide glyphosate. Moore told Paul Moreira that one "could drink a whole quart of it" without any harm. When Moore was challenged to drink a glass of the weedkiller, he refused, saying "I'm not an idiot" and "I'm not stupid" before ending the interview.
DR Moore was saying you could, not you should.
@@ianrowley5762 Semantics? Seriously?
My thoughts exactly. If the IPCC talked about the positive effects of humans on the environment (cleaner air, water, restoring the carbon cycle, etc.), then they'd be out of a job! The IPCC's corruption is inherent by their very NEED to cast a negative light on humans.
The Heartland Institute is an American conservative and libertarian public policy think tank known for its rejection of the scientific consensus on climate change and the negative health impacts of smoking.This is who Moore works for
Aren't they also funded by the Koch Brothers? Like how PragerU and the Daily Wire are funded by the Wilks Brothers. God, what is with morally bankrupt conservative oil barons and being brothers?
There may or may not be any problem with GMOs but Monsanto have developed these plants in order to expand the use of their product Glyphosphate which has to be the worst chemical input used by agriculture today and traces of which can be found everywhere from the food we eat to our bodies
Does anyone have the chart he refers to saying that global temperatures have remained flat apart from one el nino year? The charts ive found show an exponential warming.
Just all about follow the money.
Love listening to him speak but I wish he would sight sources to arm the rational science based folks in the intellectual battles
He can't!
Excellent,
Not an environmentalist, left Greenpeace ages ago and now works for energy companies.
And from viewers like me :-)
Moore is really good but he should focus more on the Co2 lag and the forcing that never happened. Euan Mears is really good at analyzing graphs from the vostok core that implement the ~800 year lag.
Why does my feed drop when I have two or more bars on my Wifi scale? Something smells I believe.
Please, can you explain to us, somehow how the GMO is not deteimental. I notice that this has taken hold in me as well, but can you recommend..more layman litterature available to understand more of this? It does not really help me much to say it is stupid. Thank you.
What is his vision about the Nitrogen problem?
My current favourite fantasy: a public debate, in which Dr Moore is pitted against (say) a panel consisting of Greta Thunberg, King Charles, the Pope, and Jennifer Aniston. Normally, I'm against Blood Sports - but in this case..................
Sanity at last.
I am sorry, but I do not believe in the power of Monsanto as improving on creation! The problem with Vitamin A is a problem of ignorance about WHITE RICE. Brown whole rice contains Vitamin A in the husk. If all the cultures used whole grain rice there would not be the Vitamin A problem.
GLYPOSATE ROUND UP FERTILIZER is the problem not GMOs
Am assumming you meant to put some commas in there,as glyphosate is not a fertilizer, Yes Shri Lanka stopped using them, look how that turned out.
pH electrodes can measure pH continously.
But need frequent recalibration!
I would argue the intention of the genetic modification. When that comes down to creating a product that relies on, in fact, requires you to buy other products, is that good?
eh?
That is the question. What happens if heritage seeds disappear ?
I love the free spirit of Patrick Moore but I think he is partly wrong on GMO. GMO in itself is not necessarily good or bad. Indeed the seed is probably noy going to harm you. But Bayer Monsanto for instance makes seeds so that the plants grow mostly to be glyphosate based herbicide resistant. That is harmful as we now know these herbicides cause cancer and contain heavy metals like cadmium and arsenic. Also the seed are sold for one year and monsanto strives on suing farmers. Due to these more than 250 000 farmers, particularly in India, have taken their own lives. Also GMO is made to be grown in monoculture, which has very harmful effects on wildlife. The inventors of GMO tech say themselves that GMO doesn't increase yields. The public is not always right, like with climate, but it's not always wrong like the 66 countries that highly regulate GMO.
Poncho, You need to read more. Facts do not care about your opinion. And clearly your submision here is your opinion. I chose facts!!!!
ponch0partout yeah I’m with you my jury is out on this
But I go a step further I am very sceptic about vaccines and I have a few reasons,I’ve seen listeria in my factory that I worked in mutate and we had to stop production on a few occasions and spend weeks just cleaning and over my 17 yrs I’ve seen them have to change chemicals due to them no longer working against listeria etc and then also antibiotics not working like they use to.
I’m concerned that in 50/100 yrs time we find we have weakened our natural immune systems due to vaccines and that flus and chicken pox mutate to become to strong for even the best vaccine. So I am very concerned about vaccines.
I was once a die hard global warming freak head but I know this is lies cause I didn’t just start following it yesterday but almost four decades again and none of their prediction models have come true,we haven’t run out of resources like they said we would and seas haven’t risen to the point of us swimming for it and the ozone is all good again now.In fact I was such a believer in this and because of the over population thing I did my own personal bit thinking I was helping to save the human race,I didn’t have children but now I realise my mistake but it’s to late for me but I’m worried that the kids of today are gonna be so scared that there is nothing to live for they just give up on everything cause the push today is even worse then it was back in the 80/90 ,today they even teach this bs in schools but back in the 80/90 we only learnt it from the tv. So yeah I’m worried about the kids of today and the fear tactics that are been pushed at every younger ages,politics moving into schools. It’s really very disgusting actually.
yeah, and even if GMO as a whole or even those companies aren't 100% bad, I mean look at the history... Uhh, yeah...
Wow very interesting, especially how this guy says so many half truths and to “validate” his perspectives.
This perspective is from a psychological one, as for climate change, most of what was predicted has not happened, but are we polluting our plant, our home, yes absolutely!
Yeah... Dr. Moore, there is nothing more scary that a company like Monsanto being the intellectual owner of all seeds sold to farmers, while farmers eradicate all non gmo alternatives.
Go look at research of trapped air in ice and do some research in interglacials and what they found... then come back... 😂 then go listen to what this man says 😅 this man is words, no data.
Isn't 'Dr.' Patrick the guy that told us drinking a quart of RoundUp is perfectly healthy? now more CO2 is a good thing?
Currently most climate science deniers brand themselves as 'skeptics' but they tend to have zero desire to critically look at what their idols are presenting and their backgrounds. Below are issues that the interviewer failed to mention and the video description leaves out.
Patrick Moore
www.desmogblog.com/patrick-moore
What President Trump, Fox and Breitbart Are Not Saying About Climate Science Denier Patrick Moore
www.desmogblog.com/2019/03/12/trump-tucker-carlson-fox-breitbart-climate-science-denier-patrick-moore
Climate Science Denier Patrick Moore Under Attack From Fellow Nuclear Energy Advocates
www.desmogblog.com/2016/04/07/climate-science-denier-patrick-moore-under-attack-fellow-nuclear-energy-advocates
Dr. Patrick Moore Just Misled Congress
davidappell.blogspot.ca/2014/02/dr-patrick-moore-just-misled-congress.html
Climate Science Denier Patrick Moore Paid by Coal Lobbyists EURACOAL To Speak To EU Officials and Members of Parliament
www.desmogblog.com/2016/03/14/coal-lobbyists-euracoal-paid-patrick-moore-dinner-climate-science-deniers-eu-officials-and-european-parliament-members
@@vernonbrechin4207 But Patrick seems like an honest person?
@@tommy-jy5ig - Many people believe their own shit just as Donald Trump believes in the thousands of lies and distortions he constantly spews. They live in their own alternative reality.
@@vernonbrechin4207 Do you think Patrick is so easily able to lie because he is a psychopath, like Donald?
@@tommy-jy5ig - I don't label people such things to explain why they are other than us. I believe that a person can be absolutely confident that they are right and good but that later historians can judge them to be just the opposite. I believe the human ego plays a role in reassuring us that we are good. I do not buy into the concept that bad things must come from people who have ill intent.
The earth is getting greener. Why is that ?
Whales were not saved by Greenpeace. It was oil, both as fuel & for making plastic that saved the whales. Whaling started to decline as soon as kerosene was used for lamps instead of whale oil.
You've got your wires crossed. Do the research.
@ 18:00 is that double speak? Unforeseen issues.
The man that says we need liquefied coal in the future as fuel, also the man says he with greenpeace was the cause of the clean air of western cities? Wasnt that the move from coal to gas?.... 😅
GMO seeds are not allowed to be kept by farmers to plant the next year, thereby limiting farmer’s profits by following centuries of farming practices - that is what the Indians are saying about those seeds!
7:23
Part 2
ruclips.net/video/sXxktLAsBPo/видео.html
Clear, true and also NOT money driven!! Compare Patrick to Al Gore?. Someone is getting very fat and sleek on the horror message!!
This is a very strange interview. He says many things very quickly seemingly to support a general point but he doesn’t go into any detail about them to provide evidence. Example: “Nobody died from the Fukushima disaster.” Besides the fact that it is not entirely false, he makes the wrong conclusions from it. The low number of people who died is due to very efficient evacuation from the areas most likely affected by the radiation OR the possibility of radiation exposure. Since they were evacuated quickly how can you conclude that therefore nuclear reactors are safe? Which is what he seems to be hinting at? It is a very strange line of argument he is using.
Anyone notice the sponsors of this channel? Funded by oil and gas? 😆 Another piece of oil and gas propaganda. Could have told ya with a channel called "conversations that matter." Cringe!!
Everything good comes from and is controlled by God - mortal men work for Him, or against Him whether they know this or not - I reckon this explains why Christianity is the way to the Light - or so it seems to many Englishmen of my age. It is beyond mind-blowing to consider this... T S Eliot did a good job of trying to grasp the mysteries that we face daily - and will never know, perhaps, in The Four Quartets. So, sometimes, when I hear some dreadful paid-for scientist or imbecilic presenter babbling on I put this poem on in my head - or a piece of Vaughan William's - and I remember the sky and I actually come alive again!
I bet he has changed his mind about VACCINES now...also what about aspartame.. GMO ecoli bacteria...and roundup
regarding the transfer of patients from the ICU in Japan, can you imagine any hospital staff staying there ?? Of course they had to evacuate them.
Why does he STILL claim he’s a co-founder of Greenpeace?
I think that if Dr M's beliefs aligned with the yoo enn's then we wouldn't be presented with this insulting ''blue banner''.
Moore is right about GMO's and nuclear power here, but he's also involved in the misinformation campaigns about AGW. The interviewer gives him a free ride as he doesn't seem to know either, which is a major problem as Moore rarely allows himself to be questioned by knowledgeable people over his anti-AGW position.
There's a real conspiracy here. Elon Musk recommends the documentary The Merchants of Doubt. I've seen it. It's a must watch.
Ice Age Farmer
Patrick... You have lost your mind... I am so sad... God bless your heart...
..
Patrick Moore is no longer an environmentalist; he is a paid performer for a PR firm that represents anti-environment companies.
Interesting Program But the Constant Adverts are More than enough Reason to Not Subscribe
As for GMO's....so how can Mr. Moore explain why so many farmers in India committed suicide when their GMO seeds failed to produce successfully?
Is he also saying that Glyphosate is ok to use in agriculture?
Cannot follow his logic about GMO's. When a farmer plants GMO seeds, those seeds will not be able to reproduce again, unlike heirloom or non-GMO seeds. So farmers are forced to continue to buy the GMO seeds. Who is paying Mr. Moore to make his claims?
Dearth of Carbon or Death of Carbon?
Dearth means a scarcity or lack of something.
Comments pertinent to Galileo Galilei are not correct. His theory concerning Heliocentrism: that the Sun - and not the Earth was the center of our solar system was not arbitrarily condemned. He taught his theory in the Universities of Bologna and Turin. And, in the assessment of Hilaire Belloc, an very militant Catholic apologist: "It was splendidly applauded in the schools."
Galileo however, quarrelsomely, taught his theory as if it were fact. Which, at that time, it was not. When his theory was proven correct, the Church accepted it without qualification. Moore's statement that Galileo was held under house arrest for the rest of his life is also misleading. House arrest as we understand is not at all what house arrest was like at that time.
Galileo could leave his house, he could visit friends, attend Mass, and was, to an considerable extent, free and without administrative and procedural restraints. Even several centuries later, the non - denominational Protestant mystic, John Bunyan, was also held under house arrest by the protestant authorities in England. But, (but), they still allowed him to present himself in the public domain. And to preach his doctrines and beliefs which "the authorities" of the time considered heretical.
Patrick Moore's comments pertinent to plastics, and GMO foods, and seeds are refreshing and candid. And honest. He may however, consider re - reading his history pertinent to Galileo. And possibly, John Bunyan. As well.
This guy has lost it. I wonder how he feels about spraying glyphosate on the forests. What part of BC is he looking at when he says everything looks fine. Has he seen the clear cuts? Just trying to stay in front of a camera. Monsanto loves this guy, and Union Carbide, and DOW and ...
Chernobyl was caused entirely by idiot humans. Technican's who were NOT nuclear scientist decided to try an experiment. Had normal operating procedures been followed, NOTHING would have happened.
Using a coolant with a positive temperature coefficient was another crucial link in that chain of error.
Describing a man who earns his living as a PR man for nuclear power, logging firms and Monsanto, as an environmentalist is doublespeak!
THE CHINESE ARE NOT DOING IT!
Clearly he's all over the climate issue, but on everything else - GMOs, health - he's totally focused on narrow outcome measures. That's as sinful in science as making stuff up - more insidious in fact, because you can hide a lot of evil that way (and he does, to wit GMOs). I remember when the "Green movement" was the Ecology movement. It means you have to look at the whole tapestry and not get hung up on the individual threads. It was a counter to the compartmentalisation in politics that is so damaging. It seems Moore likes compartmentalisation, but in an ecological model you can't afford to do that.
He certainly lost much of his audience when he called anti-vaxxers "stupid". Dear oh dear, stick to what you've studied, I suggest.
Your breaks for advertisements are ridiculous. If you are in a conversation, it's very rude to be interrupted every few minutes. Cop on and get rid of those interruptions midway it the conversation.
Agree. Very annoying, particularly the volume increase.
Doctor Patrick ---- I've faked it too. But in my case, not for the money.
Why doesn't the interviewer do some basic research before interviewing someone. He looks to be bereft of even the basics of science! Even basic chemistry describes acids, bases and pH. What about Litmus tests?
Hardly useful to any conversation. Despite the journalistic failure this is very sad propaganda by a no one.
Why does he have to have such immutable opinions in areas he has no expertise in, like gmos, vaccines or radiation?
How can you generally and categorically say gmos are safe? How would you know?
So it doesn't matter what we modify in genes, it will always all be fine to consume? I guess he took all his covid shots and boosters as well...
What a sad piece of propaganda. As I watched this I wonder when the lie, spin and propaganda would be challenged. If one doesn't ask the real questions and challenge fairy tales I suppose it matters.
What a pile of rubbish. Ph CAN be monitored continuously.
gOOGLEmyBALLS THINKS i am stupid!!! :Global warming
Global warming is the long-term rise in the average temperature of the Earth's climate system. It is a major aspect of climate change and has been demonstrated by direct temperature measurements and by measurements of various effects of the warming. Global warming and climate change are often used interchangeably.
Wikipedia"
Yeppers
Don't agree with the part of IPCC models and caushes with new GMO.
Why?
This is a guy that shuffled back and forth trying desperately to be noticed, then along came Greta Thunberg who stole his thunder became a global figure in climate change, sad sad old man the jealousy is just too painful to watch.
Get good gardening tools because nuclear war is inevitable.
Meh....This stooge has long been exposed as nothing more than a "scientist for hire"......His being "outed" by a french journalist is epic and hilarious !! Search - patrick moore glyphosate for a good laugh!!
"stooge", "Scientist for hire", "outed by French journalist"; personals slurs rather than arguments. You may be perfectly correct in your belief that he lacks credibility. However, you have done nothing to substantiate this.
Idiot jerk . You have no credibility. Patrick Moore is a hero of mine for good reasons. He has been a pioneer of environmental science.
GMO's and modern farming techniques feed the world and you have no understanding of reality.
credenza1 - There are lots of examples available to you. I am not going to do your due diligence......
You suffer from cognitive dissonance my friend. he is a toad
This guy is a quack.
what percent of the atmosphere is CO2? Look it up
Lora - Dunning_Kruger Effect /\ /\ /\