Can you make a steam powered rc car? or fire, like a flame licker engine? Or go for a personal record how far you could get it to go in a straight line
Correct me if I'm wrong but without a stabiliser like EDTA or citric acid wouldn't the permanganate break down to manganese dioxide over an hour or so anyway? Like that would be the brown colour seen on the ceramic... But then again those very same stabilisers generally prevent metal ions reacting to decompose hydrogen peroxide (that's... Kind of their point), so they would probably interfere with and slow down the reaction? It's been ages since I did any related chemistry, I'm just here for Tom, that sexy sexy man.
@@etelmo yes, a stabilizer would slow the reaction down. But not to the point that it wouldn't work at all. It all really depends on what the stabilizer is and how much it affects the reaction. Manganese dioxide does work as a catalyst, but it's not as fast acting as the permanganate. So you get diminished performance, but not to an extent to where it's not useful. Also, I'm not sure if you're referring to the permanganate breaking down spontaneously over time, or while in the reaction? Yes, it does break down into the manganese dioxide upon reacting, but no it won't break down while sitting there waiting to react with the peroxide. As long as it doesn't come into contact with a fuel, it'll be fine. Those catalyst ceramic pieces could be soaked and dried and stored for long periods if they are kept in air tight bags. If left out, they may degrade slowly over the course of a few weeks..... Maybe.
Video idea: attach something like an afterburner to the back of the nozzle so that you can use the oxygen from the reaction to boost some type of combustion, maybe even add alcohol in the acid to ignite it in the first chamber.
That sludge at the end can be used to line the edges of the reaction chamber, just like a sugar rocket. Leaving a hole through the center going straight to the nozzle from the peroxide injector. _The nozzle is honestly optional with the sheer pressure coming out; bigger exit, less explosion, more retrys._
With your CNC skills improving, you should revisit some of your Tesla projects using more and more metal parts! It would be cool to see the turbines last longer.
one thing I love is that, the more Integza progresses, the less his engines look like modded water bottle, as they take a much more legit and pro look.
Video Idea: now that you have higher a working rocket of sorts, make a big one with multiple output nozzles, or a multi stage rocket! Tomatoes are disgusting!! 🍅
Actually a poor idea, oxygen peroxide is a rocket fuel in itself (monopropellant) and has been used for decades by nasa as a way to propel small rockets & position satellites. All you need to convert H2O2 into supersonic steam is a silver mesh acting as a catalyst. This is also how the Bell jet pack was propelled.
you could try suspending the MnO2 or KMnO4 with the 3d printed ceramic part to particle impregnate the part, and then calcine/anneal the catalyst to the support (around 600C ish). it should prevent the manganese losses and prevent the blockages/high back pressures. the flow through the support should increase the surface contact with the heterogeneous catalyst improving the mass transfer making the reaction go boom boom faster
Instead of using a secondary source to compress the plunger, you could use a small tube to take some of the pressure generated by the reaction. This way it will make the reaction self-sustained once initiated.
What if you used the oxygen created in this case to fuel a hybrid rocket? You could create another gas generator that makes something like hydrogen or acetylene, mix the flammable gas with the oxygen in a combustion chamber, and ignite the mix. If you tuned it right, it might not explode, lol...like if want to see this tried! I might do it on my own channel if Integza doesn't try it first!
hydrogen peroxide has been used as an oxidizer in hyperbolic rockets (aka the propellant ignites itself when combined). but normally they use Liquid oxygen because you get a higher specific impulse (basically gas milage for rockets)
I'd love to see you revisit some of the older rockets you've made using the hot tips given by people in the comments. There's almost always at least one person with an easy fix that'd make your insane machines work even better and I'd love to see it.
For a video idea, saturate your ceramic blocks with silver (colloidal silver?) instead. This is what is used in jetpacks. It flashes to steam and doesn't have the nastiness that elephant toothpaste does as it flashes to pure steam.
As fun as it is to see the reaction as it happens, I recommend that you dedicate a video to experimenting with different materials for an ignition chamber. (Aluminum tubing, thicker PVC, carbon fiber, etc.)
Wow. That first successful test really surprised me! I expected a reaction, but to see the skateboard actually take off was very satisfying. Proof of concept is a nice fuzzy feeling.
Video idea: You should try to weight your next rocket before and after testing it. So you can estimate how much thrust force you should have, velocity at the nozzle... Things like that.
if you know the weight of the fuel, you could figure out the isp of the rocket engine, which is the measurement of the efficacy of a rocket nozzle. I don't imagine it would be that high, around 60 to 70, but it could be over 200, which is standard for atmospheric rockets.
@@logicbuilder1204 HTP monopropellant tops out in the mid 100's. The efficiency losses with his current experimental assembly probably have it around 20-40. For reference nitrogen cold gas using a modern nozzle design is 90.
I'd be super interested in seeing a video to explore what other kinds of things you can do with those porus ceramic parts. They worked so well in providing a lot of dry contact area for the permanganate.
This was actually a so much more impressive than your past engines! It actually worked better then you expected for once! Now you just need it to be a little more repeatable and it will be great!
Seeing a video comparing the weight of different rocket engines before and after thrust would be cool. Show how much mass is released in the exhaust of the rocket and factor how that changes the thrust as it gets lighter.
This is essentially how the classic jetpack works. They use a high concentration hydrogen peroxide with a silver or platinum mesh screen as a catalyst to instantly vaporize the H2O2 into steam.
Fire Fighting Nozzle Since you play with fire so much I think a fire fighting nozzle would be cool. Something that mixes water and soap together to make a foam for putting out fires.
You should have millions of viewers. You always release awesome content, and always, on a consistent basis, I genuinely laugh out loud during the duration of the videos. Every video. Thank you, sir, for always making my day better when I watch your videos. In the future, I know that you will have a huge audience. Millions. People who do not subscribe eat raw tomato sandwiches. Eww
@@tonyhussey3610 just cuz you one of the real ones doesn't mean they're in a high proportion of jackasses in your age group. the jackasses in mine fall for different shit than this is what I'm saying.
Use high pressure water pipes with standard fittings and stop use glue everywhere! These will withstand much more pressure ᕦ(✰ω✰)ᕤ #suggestion for new videos P.S. You are making amazing progress!
Video idea: Try making a turbo pump for your liquid fueled monoprop engine. That would replace the syringes and could give you (in theory) a much higher chamber pressure and therefore more thrust. Don't know if the current design can handle this kind of loads though and you might need a larger nozzle due to increased expansion of the exhaust gas
So unnecessary and over complicated, a pressure fed monoprop engine like this can make sooo much more thrust than he's currently making, his design is good, just needs to work on the materials a bit more so it stops blowing up and leaking
I've always wanted to see someone build a solar-oven, solar water heater, or solar panel that tracks the sun automatically. I have a few ideas for how to make it work, but I currently lack the resources or space to test my ideas. I would be very interested to see how YOU would approach the challenge, and what solutions you would come up with.
I remember seeing something that used simply four light sensors controlling two motors driving an altazimuth mount, and a shade that will just barely shield those if it is pointing straight at the sun. If it is pointing slightly off, one or two of the sensors will receive sunlight, and thus cause the motors to turn the contraption until it is pointed directly at the sun.
@@zuthalsoraniz6764 That's a clever idea. It's similar in concept to one of my own imagined possible solutions, and seems like it's relatively cheap and simple. Thanks for sharing the idea! One of my ideas was for a more "passive" solution, like calculating (using math that's currently beyond **me**, personally) whether or not there is an "optimal" shape for a parabolic mirror that can be aligned with the "arc" the sun describes as it moves through the sky, so that *less* effort is needed to keep it in the optimal position.
as long as you place the device in a completely clear area, you can create a simple bit of control software where the logic goes something like this... For initial startup, rotate entire assembly for the full range of motion, at a 45 degree elevation. The angle where you get the highest voltage out of your cells is the sun position. Rotate assembly to that and sweep through elevation from 0 to 90 degrees, record the highest voltage, rotate to that. Done, you're facing the sun. Following that, every 5 minutes, sweep the device left to right by a small amount (like +/- 10 degrees) and record the highest voltage, lock to that, then adjust elevation. Sleep for 8 hours if voltage drops below a certain threshold or unless the threshold is tripped again - that's your night mode. Once night mode ends, revert to initial startup. You can make this logic work with a cheap Arduino. You'll also need a car battery, two motors and two motor controllers, some solar panels and a bunch of metal to build the rotating frame out of. Keep all the electronics (including battery) as part of the mobile assembly, Run a long extension cord. Use a free-rotation extension cord if you can. Good luck, the project is pretty easy but will require some bumbling around with the code and the welding. (The reason you do a full sweep at wakeup/startup is to avoid accidentally tracking local maxima such as a reflection from a window or someone's driveway light. With algorithms, sometimes dumber is better.)
Video idea: attach 6 of these in parallel like the Atlas HLV rocket, have the tip contain a CO2 cartridge (this would distribute the pressure by all 6, should be about 9 bar pressure to each and use a vent valve to control output pressure, you dont need all co2 contents, so it doesnt have to be efficient but its lower weight and size, plus the vent will create lots of smoke which is cool for video!). Use a membrane (like the ketchup bottles) to separate the water from the fuel or a burst cap (plastic film?) if its not water proof enough, this should make it all a single component with no need for glue or any other weak points. Bigger == better! That should make an awesome video!
I highly recommend changing out the plastic for metal parts to deal with the pressure, as is we've seen enough of the combustion, its time you made something for long term repeated use.
@@Nworthholf If not for the fact that its yet to become a mass produced item, that would work to some degree; so to expansive at this time, so hopefully in a few decades then.
This would be *incredibly* inefficient _but_ it would be interesting to see how much electricity you can generate when using that reaction to shoot the gases into a closed mill that's hooked up to a small motor. Or something similar.
@@archie4521 thanks, but if he makes this, he should employ built in disk spacers, but there on the outer perimeter, and they deflect the moving fluid toward the center, similar to the second version of his tesla turbine, but there on the outside. this would also give it more tourqe, and should be used to try and make a steam engine
if i had to guess, the permanganate decomposing in the ceramic matrix created superfine nanoparticles embedded all over the large surface area of the ceramic; this is actually the logic behind a lot of industrial catalysts. cool that it worked!
I love how when he figures out to use the old syringes and that pirates of the Caribbean esc music starts playing, the syringe popping out is a near perfect octave Above the key of the piece making it a perfect last note to the phrase.
This reminds me of "water bottle rockets" that simply push water out using compressed air. Maybe try pressurising the air and peroxide in the same bottle before pushing it through the catalyst, removing the need for the syringe entirely. Bearing in mind the system is gravity fed if you plan on using a horizontal test bed. I want to see your motors make something fly!
This would work. It is done in real rockets too where there is no bladder/liner inside the propellant tank to keep pressurant separated from propellant. It just adds the requirement for ullaging to settle the propellant in the tanks. Apollo did this using the smaller rcs engines to apply a little forward thrust, the bipropellants for the AJ10-137 thus settled to the bottom of the tank. So yeah, omitting the syringe and pressurizing the perozide container directly should work just fine.
Not a bad idea. Even just having a water section after the hydrogen peroxide/steam nozzle that the pressure built up forces the water out. Having the heavier mass be thrusted backwards will give a much higher impulse.
@@CharlieSolis that would be less efficient. You want your exhaust gasses/reaction medium coming out the nozzle to be as low mass and high velocity as possible.
On i feel like making this out of steel for the “combustion chamber” would work quite well and you may be able to seal it better with threaded ends. That one way valve would be able to thread in and it wouldnt be able to jump off
So your KMnO4 is reacting with the H2O2 to make KOH (lye) and MnO2. The MnO2 that it makes will be super fine and have a massive amount of surface area which then the H2O2 can decompose on. Pretty cool stuff.
@@Alsry1 yes and no. If you're a chemist lye refers to the leachate of wood ash/pot-ash (this is where the name potassium comes from) which is predominantly KOH, so historically lye referred to KOH and not NaOH. You are correct though that lye now more so refers to NaOH as it is far cheaper to produce and has replaced KOH as the "household" alkali salt.
I have to be honest, I didnt even know what the video was about but when I saw that Integza uploaded I knew it was going to be good and I immediately clicked
Video Idea: Now strap it to a Rocket (but reinforce the dang thing to withstand those pressures) , who cares if NASA wasn't built in 2 days, Integza Space Program was.
Mark Rober is literally a rocket engineer. He would have absolutely no problem getting his hands on PURE peroxide, as this is in fact a rocket fuel type still in use today. A very FUN fuel type in fact.
get your hands on a pipe, add kerosene, a little bit of peroxide, and ignite using a radio controller.. *you've successfully made a chemical pipe bomb !!!*
Integza your rocket it producing lots of O2, add fuel and a 3D printed nozzle and BOOM a rocket or possibly a large explosion. Either way it will be cool.
I was just thinking about that, the problem though is that most of this O2 is saturated with water vapor, so igniting it would be really hard, maybe if he could dry out the exhausted vapors it could turn into a legit combustion rocket engine
@@justinmolina4557 never thought about that, so he can just mix the engine's oxygen output with some propane and make basically a flamethrower? That's some freaking cool idea to try out
At this point you're into plumbing, which can be tricky. Thankfully RUclips has a fantastic certified plumber who can probably help. And he also has a bit of a thing for rockets, which might be helpful. What I'm trying to say is that you should definitely look into doing a collaboration with Colin Furze about the next step :D
I mean a pcb pipe a hacksaw some duck tape and whatever you can get your hands on for fuel. Boom make shift rocket for less then 30 bucks made from hand tools.
This was an great result. On each of these I would be curious how much of the thrust is accounted for by the energy put into the system by the pressurized air or whatever else is used to move the materials. I am also voting Integza as “Most Likely To Blow Himself Up”. Don’t want to see that of course but man o man I cringe at times! For the science!
I would say the air input only accounts for a tiny bit at the beginning, the plunger does keep it well separate from the chamber. Most of the thrust here is from the reaction making steam, just like the Heinkel rocket plane did with the same fuel combinations.
Great video as always!!! I'm wondering, with all that oxygen in the exhaust, could it be used directly to power a hybrid rocket like you made in other videos? Or maybe an afterburner?
Video idea: Could you do something with laminar flow! Always find it super interesting, and I wonder if you could print a laminar flow nozzle that would work for a light up display (to send a rocket through at some point!)
I remember when I was younger, I was consistently rinsing an item in hydrogen peroxide. I eventually set out a dish of hydrogen peroxide which I would drop the item into then retrieve it and use the same dish of hydrogen peroxide later. As young kids do, I forgot about it and went several days without using that bowl. When I finally used it again, it immediately burned (not flammably) the skin on my fingertips. The only logical assumption is that water evaporated and increased the concentration of the hydrogen peroxide. Why not try slowly evaporating hydrogen peroxide or using low heat to distill water off of it?
This is so awesome. You should totallu try making a radial engine using similar ingredients as your turbo jet engine. I want to attempt to make my own jet engine in the future. Your videos have been a great resource!
Why not try printing a gas powered nozzle capable of accelerating air through the speed of sound, you could then combine such a nozzle with most of your other rocket or jet exhaust allowing you to greatly increase the exit velocity and so improve the amount of thrust produced. A way to do this would be to take a compressor fan/centrifugal fan like the one you used for the afterburner and use it in much the same way as in that video to produce a stream of higher pressure air, then pass this into a sufficiently converging nozzle, this will take you up to the speed of sound. The harder part is then to get the diverging nozzle on the other side to expand at the correct rate leading to supersonic flow through the bell, and then maybe some nice images of some mach diamonds out the back.
The idea is good, but it wouldn't work with any commercial EDF and most DIY centrifugal fans cause De-Laval nozzles start working at pressure ratios of at least 2.5 (Chamber Pressure / Ambient Pressure), but EDF's can't go beyond 0.1 atm overpressure. To get the required pressure ratio you would need a multistage axial compressor like in a real turbo-jet engine.
*VIDEO IDEA FROM IKIA* Connect a mini canon to your turbo boosted jet with a Seal in between when there is enough pressure of exhaust the seal will break yeeting the load 👍
I wouldn't recommend using plastic gloves when burning things, if a hot flame or a drop of hot liquid, in fact, if anything hot reaches your gloves, the latex will melt and you'll have a great tale to tell when you go camping with your friends and family. Other than that, great video as always.
As someone who knew very little about rocketry when I started watching your channel, it's exciting to see the progression of your rocket designs! Can't wait to see the next iteration of your devil's toothpaste rocket, or DTR, which given the initials I think you should henceforth refer to as Dietrich.
Nice - you basically built a H2O2 based monopropellant rocket engine! Though your thrust in this design is capped by your maximum chamber pressure, which is limited by your maximum injection pressure which in this case is 4 bar due to your "fuel pump" design - which if i recall correctly has been used in the past by I think soviet rockets. (top of the tank as a piston head to pressurize the fuel above using pressurized gas as a driving force). A very simple and elegant solution. With your Ethanol / H2O2 / Permanganate experiments you by the way almost had a replica of a WW2 German V2 Rocket engine. Using H2O2 via Permanganate catalyst to drive a turbo pump that feeds an Ethanol / Water mixture and Liquid Oxygen into the chamber of the engine (water was added to reduce exhaust temperature because of problems with nozzle disintegration)
Maybe find a slightly slower, steady reaction to produce the steam and use the steam to run a Tesla turbine powering a propeller. If you can make a light enough high pressure catalyst container, you may be able to get a longer running engine than just the short blast rocket engine.
I don't think you needed to stop using the CO² cylinders, just find a way to control the pressure. Needs some feedback, a pressure sensor somewhere that feeds into an MCU that can control a gas regulator of some sort. With a super high sampling rate on the pressure tool be able to actually control it down at the microsecond level.
In fact I think a lot of things on this engine could stand to feedback into a controller and keep everything in line. Chamber pressure, peroxide pump pressure, acceleration and velocity just to start with. You might even be able to add an emergency shutdown for when something spikes without input, a runaway pressure change in the decomposer for instance. Then you can have it all laid out at the end of the recording and tied against the video and whatever control units the MCU makes. Eventually this will end up controlling the thrust vectoring for when you prototype a vertical rocket. And you can send a crash stop shutdown command wirelessly to the machine too. Ultimately this system can be upgraded to the point that it can perform landing operations too.
Project Idea: Maybe try to make a "professional" water rocket before building a chemical one, something that would fly hundreds of meters, you could even test it with an aerospike nozzle (or hydrospike?)!. I think it would help you develop the final version of a chemical rocket.
Do you remember your compressed air engine video Integza? You should try and make an RC plane that uses one and make it fly. If your going to go for a CO2 propellant maybe try adding some pressure regulating valve so that it doesn't come out as fast and without solid chunks of CO2 while also having it at a slight downward angle and use the bigger 88g CO2 cartridge instead of the small 12g you have used before. Alternatively maybe a metal steel container that you could compress air into. I remember Slingshot channel making insane contraption that could take huge amounts of air pressure safely, thought it is heaver so you might need glider size wings to be able to lift that.
Catalyzer sounds like a serum that some evil genius (named, ohhh, I dunno, Integza) developed to turn people into cats. Maybe that should your next video: developing the catalyzer.
A larger check valve seems obvious I guess but im super glad you put in a direction change like that mid video! Totally made me what to follow allong more.
Video idea : now that you have mastered the art of devil's toothpaste, you can build a canon out of it. Quite the same setup as this video except that the chamber is standing still while shooting something ! (Like tomatoes for example 😈)
You should add some support rings to the chamber, and then maybe attach the one way valve to that structure so that way is not only the glue that is securing it
Go to NordVPN.com/integza to get a 2-year plan plus 4 additional months with a huge discount!
Hello
first
I need a 3d printer cause its too costly for me
@@whereitallhappens784 bruh
Integza
it looks like you really like WW2 stuff, soooo , do you play warthunder?
Can I use this to quickly apply regular toothpaste to my toothbrush?
Lol
Your teeth would shine like the sun 🤣
@@integza XD as his gums get burned off
@@integza if they remain in place 😂😂😂
Can you make a steam powered rc car? or fire, like a flame licker engine? Or go for a personal record how far you could get it to go in a straight line
It's beautiful
Yes it is 😁
Nobody is here, just us 5 😉
Make that 4
@@chucknorris4768 yessir
Look! It's a man, speaking to another man. :)
(I am a fan of both... don't tell anyone)
Very cool mate!! Great to see that porous ceramic catalyst working as well as it did!
Sometimes the weird ideas work ahahah
@@integza frfr
@@integza I guess it's not that weird it's like the catalyst converters inside cars the way it's made is what is weird
Correct me if I'm wrong but without a stabiliser like EDTA or citric acid wouldn't the permanganate break down to manganese dioxide over an hour or so anyway? Like that would be the brown colour seen on the ceramic...
But then again those very same stabilisers generally prevent metal ions reacting to decompose hydrogen peroxide (that's... Kind of their point), so they would probably interfere with and slow down the reaction?
It's been ages since I did any related chemistry, I'm just here for Tom, that sexy sexy man.
@@etelmo yes, a stabilizer would slow the reaction down. But not to the point that it wouldn't work at all. It all really depends on what the stabilizer is and how much it affects the reaction. Manganese dioxide does work as a catalyst, but it's not as fast acting as the permanganate. So you get diminished performance, but not to an extent to where it's not useful. Also, I'm not sure if you're referring to the permanganate breaking down spontaneously over time, or while in the reaction? Yes, it does break down into the manganese dioxide upon reacting, but no it won't break down while sitting there waiting to react with the peroxide. As long as it doesn't come into contact with a fuel, it'll be fine. Those catalyst ceramic pieces could be soaked and dried and stored for long periods if they are kept in air tight bags. If left out, they may degrade slowly over the course of a few weeks..... Maybe.
This is WAY TOO FUN
Yeah kind of
Thank you Xyla 😁
@@integza Im your big fan please reply 🤗
Integza, Xyla Foxlin, and Smarter Every Day in one place on the internet, now this is something I didn't expect
Plazma Channel's here too
I really didn’t think the devils toothpaste recipe would have been so simple, dang. Super cool video!
Yes
Thank you so much Louis 😁
@@Peowcatpeow no wonder
e
There are honestly a worrying number of really nasty reactions that are really easy to do. It's amazing things don't explode more often.
"It might explode or it might work really well."
Spoken like a true rocket scientist.
True ksp player
Yep true rocket scientist
First law of rocketry: always assume that it will explode
It's exploding, but gently.
"This will either work F L A W L E S S L Y
Or it's gonna kill me."
-The Martian
Video idea: attach something like an afterburner to the back of the nozzle so that you can use the oxygen from the reaction to boost some type of combustion, maybe even add alcohol in the acid to ignite it in the first chamber.
That sludge at the end can be used to line the edges of the reaction chamber, just like a sugar rocket.
Leaving a hole through the center going straight to the nozzle from the peroxide injector.
_The nozzle is honestly optional with the sheer pressure coming out; bigger exit, less explosion, more retrys._
With your CNC skills improving, you should revisit some of your Tesla projects using more and more metal parts! It would be cool to see the turbines last longer.
@Jonah lopes cardozo lol same to you! A bit of a rarity
@Jonah lopes cardozo Lol you too dude! It is a rare name to see
But did this Devil's toothpaste go down to Georgia, Tomato lord? Or shall I say Rocket Lord?
Melon Lord!
ah thats a good song
He was looking for a soul to steal
Attach it to a plane and you get "Lord of the flies"
i live in georgia :)
Love this project! 😎
Thank you Adrian 😁
Why is integza the only one to reply to this comment
Love your videos
one thing I love is that, the more Integza progresses, the less his engines look like modded water bottle, as they take a much more legit and pro look.
They’re at the laser cannon stage rn
Video Idea: now that you have higher a working rocket of sorts, make a big one with multiple output nozzles, or a multi stage rocket!
Tomatoes are disgusting!! 🍅
multi stage rocket sounds dangerous, i want to see it!
I hope you get the 3d printer!
Probs doesn't have enough thrust to lift off
Multi stage rocket!!
( love that idea)
Good idea
the porous ceramic part was such a genius idea.
Yeah I guess it's inspired by catalyst converters put in cars
@@markgeorge447 or catalysts used for chemical synthesis
Actually a poor idea, oxygen peroxide is a rocket fuel in itself (monopropellant) and has been used for decades by nasa as a way to propel small rockets & position satellites. All you need to convert H2O2 into supersonic steam is a silver mesh acting as a catalyst. This is also how the Bell jet pack was propelled.
@@TM-529 it's not a poor idea it's different
@@LetsDrawDragons Different..yes - Genius as the OP stated....far IMHO
Please do a linear aerospike rocket engine
Boa sorte, Raffael. Admiro muito sua capacidade e empenho!
Boa sorte. Deus abençoe que tudo dê certo pra você essa jornada
Tu é foda maninho. Tu consegue.
Boa sorte! Estou torcendo 😊
Vai que é tua Raffael!!!
Please brush your teeth with this!
Is that a dare ?
@@integza
oh boi
I take that as a challenge
The day Integza made his own pressure fed monopropellant rocket engine. Beautifully done! Next step: internship at JPL.
P.S.: I hope you develop this into a bipropellant engine, Integza. Peroxide and alcohol is a well established combination.
you could try suspending the MnO2 or KMnO4 with the 3d printed ceramic part to particle impregnate the part, and then calcine/anneal the catalyst to the support (around 600C ish). it should prevent the manganese losses and prevent the blockages/high back pressures. the flow through the support should increase the surface contact with the heterogeneous catalyst improving the mass transfer making the reaction go boom boom faster
The problem is that would yield Mno2, which way less reactive
Nice end comment abut the boom boom
Instead of using a secondary source to compress the plunger, you could use a small tube to take some of the pressure generated by the reaction. This way it will make the reaction self-sustained once initiated.
Idea:You should make a liquid cooled engine. like they do in real rockets.
real rocket engines pump the superchilled fuels through the nozzle to cool them, its pretty clever.
@@i-muts ye ik, thats why i suggested, i find it cool too
or ablative cooling, basically have the engine burn away *on purpose*
@@BlackBird-nn2yc he has done that already lol
@@i-muts yup, with the added benefit of getting the fuel warmed up before combustion.
What if you used the oxygen created in this case to fuel a hybrid rocket? You could create another gas generator that makes something like hydrogen or acetylene, mix the flammable gas with the oxygen in a combustion chamber, and ignite the mix. If you tuned it right, it might not explode, lol...like if want to see this tried! I might do it on my own channel if Integza doesn't try it first!
YESSS! DO IT INTEGZAAAA!!
hydrogen peroxide has been used as an oxidizer in hyperbolic rockets (aka the propellant ignites itself when combined). but normally they use Liquid oxygen because you get a higher specific impulse (basically gas milage for rockets)
I'd love to see you revisit some of the older rockets you've made using the hot tips given by people in the comments. There's almost always at least one person with an easy fix that'd make your insane machines work even better and I'd love to see it.
Ok the impregnated ceramic idea was genius tbh
For a video idea, saturate your ceramic blocks with silver (colloidal silver?) instead. This is what is used in jetpacks. It flashes to steam and doesn't have the nastiness that elephant toothpaste does as it flashes to pure steam.
"We literally made a rocket ship"
Integza: *It's free real-estate*
As fun as it is to see the reaction as it happens, I recommend that you dedicate a video to experimenting with different materials for an ignition chamber. (Aluminum tubing, thicker PVC, carbon fiber, etc.)
Wow. That first successful test really surprised me! I expected a reaction, but to see the skateboard actually take off was very satisfying. Proof of concept is a nice fuzzy feeling.
Video idea: You should try to weight your next rocket before and after testing it. So you can estimate how much thrust force you should have, velocity at the nozzle... Things like that.
if you know the weight of the fuel, you could figure out the isp of the rocket engine, which is the measurement of the efficacy of a rocket nozzle. I don't imagine it would be that high, around 60 to 70, but it could be over 200, which is standard for atmospheric rockets.
OMG you are a genius.
Great idea! And I'm not saying it cuz you payed me
@@logicbuilder1204 HTP monopropellant tops out in the mid 100's. The efficiency losses with his current experimental assembly probably have it around 20-40. For reference nitrogen cold gas using a modern nozzle design is 90.
@@Yaivenov makes sense. Nice to see a fellow ksp player.
I'd be super interested in seeing a video to explore what other kinds of things you can do with those porus ceramic parts. They worked so well in providing a lot of dry contact area for the permanganate.
This was actually a so much more impressive than your past engines! It actually worked better then you expected for once! Now you just need it to be a little more repeatable and it will be great!
Seeing a video comparing the weight of different rocket engines before and after thrust would be cool. Show how much mass is released in the exhaust of the rocket and factor how that changes the thrust as it gets lighter.
7:05 “and to that i have to say: bedankt!” That was weird to hear, never expected him to thank us in dutch haha
@koenvn2 je bedoelt alsjeblieft!
Ja dat was zeker raar toen ik dat hoorde
@koenvn2 oh man, wanneer houd dit kansloze ‘gekoloniseerd’ nou eens op..
This is essentially how the classic jetpack works. They use a high concentration hydrogen peroxide with a silver or platinum mesh screen as a catalyst to instantly vaporize the H2O2 into steam.
My jetpack runs on hopes and dreams
@@L39T so it is ruined?
Fire Fighting Nozzle
Since you play with fire so much I think a fire fighting nozzle would be cool. Something that mixes water and soap together to make a foam for putting out fires.
This dude builds everyhing except regular rocket engines
You should have millions of viewers. You always release awesome content, and always, on a consistent basis, I genuinely laugh out loud during the duration of the videos. Every video. Thank you, sir, for always making my day better when I watch your videos. In the future, I know that you will have a huge audience. Millions. People who do not subscribe eat raw tomato sandwiches. Eww
just a matter of time.
@Meisya Denia why do you think that works on anyone but post middle-aged men?
@@kingmasterlord haha doesn't work on us either... Doesn't matter the age...just the IQ..
@@tonyhussey3610 just cuz you one of the real ones doesn't mean they're in a high proportion of jackasses in your age group. the jackasses in mine fall for different shit than this is what I'm saying.
@@kingmasterlord just cuz you know your age group well , does this imply you know my age group well too 🤣🤣🤣🤣
Use high pressure water pipes with standard fittings and stop use glue everywhere! These will withstand much more pressure ᕦ(✰ω✰)ᕤ
#suggestion for new videos
P.S.
You are making amazing progress!
Stuff blowing up is a big part of the fun making/watching these videos. :-)
We’re here for explosions, I don’t think he has a test field so metal parts moving at high speed aren’t exactly… great for you neighborhood bomb maker
Siri, how to build a 'pipe bomb':
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
He just needs a bigger nozzle. So that the pressure can get out instead of building up
Yeah if you want to make bombs
Video idea:
Try making a turbo pump for your liquid fueled monoprop engine.
That would replace the syringes and could give you (in theory) a much higher chamber pressure and therefore more thrust.
Don't know if the current design can handle this kind of loads though and you might need a larger nozzle due to increased expansion of the exhaust gas
In the news, next week:
"Local inventor sends tomato into low earth orbit."
I though about that too, turbines should manage the pressure much better
In other words, look up the ME163 Komet engine.
So unnecessary and over complicated, a pressure fed monoprop engine like this can make sooo much more thrust than he's currently making, his design is good, just needs to work on the materials a bit more so it stops blowing up and leaking
@@lairdcummings9092 inventor said “fuck the tomatoes, hope they freeze dried well. Whoops I mean by to say freeze died
With the catalyst on those highly porous blocks, it almost feels like a hybrid engine. I'd love to see this made into an actual rocket now.
There was an early jet pack that used damn near the same method
@@Sniperboy5551do you know what he does to make the potassium permanganate a liquid
i would love to see this project revisited with the use of epoxy and maybe even carbon fiber for the structural support you need
I like this idea
i like metal pipes better, no offence
@@Nobe_Oddy I would just take a steel tube and done not translucent but
I've always wanted to see someone build a solar-oven, solar water heater, or solar panel that tracks the sun automatically. I have a few ideas for how to make it work, but I currently lack the resources or space to test my ideas. I would be very interested to see how YOU would approach the challenge, and what solutions you would come up with.
I remember seeing something that used simply four light sensors controlling two motors driving an altazimuth mount, and a shade that will just barely shield those if it is pointing straight at the sun. If it is pointing slightly off, one or two of the sensors will receive sunlight, and thus cause the motors to turn the contraption until it is pointed directly at the sun.
@@zuthalsoraniz6764 That's a clever idea. It's similar in concept to one of my own imagined possible solutions, and seems like it's relatively cheap and simple. Thanks for sharing the idea! One of my ideas was for a more "passive" solution, like calculating (using math that's currently beyond **me**, personally) whether or not there is an "optimal" shape for a parabolic mirror that can be aligned with the "arc" the sun describes as it moves through the sky, so that *less* effort is needed to keep it in the optimal position.
as long as you place the device in a completely clear area, you can create a simple bit of control software where the logic goes something like this... For initial startup, rotate entire assembly for the full range of motion, at a 45 degree elevation. The angle where you get the highest voltage out of your cells is the sun position. Rotate assembly to that and sweep through elevation from 0 to 90 degrees, record the highest voltage, rotate to that. Done, you're facing the sun. Following that, every 5 minutes, sweep the device left to right by a small amount (like +/- 10 degrees) and record the highest voltage, lock to that, then adjust elevation.
Sleep for 8 hours if voltage drops below a certain threshold or unless the threshold is tripped again - that's your night mode. Once night mode ends, revert to initial startup.
You can make this logic work with a cheap Arduino. You'll also need a car battery, two motors and two motor controllers, some solar panels and a bunch of metal to build the rotating frame out of. Keep all the electronics (including battery) as part of the mobile assembly, Run a long extension cord. Use a free-rotation extension cord if you can.
Good luck, the project is pretty easy but will require some bumbling around with the code and the welding.
(The reason you do a full sweep at wakeup/startup is to avoid accidentally tracking local maxima such as a reflection from a window or someone's driveway light. With algorithms, sometimes dumber is better.)
AH yes, accidentally making pipebombs, my favorite youtube series
Video idea: attach 6 of these in parallel like the Atlas HLV rocket, have the tip contain a CO2 cartridge (this would distribute the pressure by all 6, should be about 9 bar pressure to each and use a vent valve to control output pressure, you dont need all co2 contents, so it doesnt have to be efficient but its lower weight and size, plus the vent will create lots of smoke which is cool for video!). Use a membrane (like the ketchup bottles) to separate the water from the fuel or a burst cap (plastic film?) if its not water proof enough, this should make it all a single component with no need for glue or any other weak points. Bigger == better! That should make an awesome video!
I highly recommend changing out the plastic for metal parts to deal with the pressure, as is we've seen enough of the combustion, its time you made something for long term repeated use.
....or use transparent aluminum!
(not sure about its chemical resistance tho)
@@Nworthholf If not for the fact that its yet to become a mass produced item, that would work to some degree; so to expansive at this time, so hopefully in a few decades then.
jet japck integza jetpack do itttttt
This would be *incredibly* inefficient _but_ it would be interesting to see how much electricity you can generate when using that reaction to shoot the gases into a closed mill that's hooked up to a small motor. Or something similar.
@Meisya Denia Get out of here
tesla devil turbine
@@zangryomani1257 That's a good name lol
@@archie4521 thanks, but if he makes this, he should employ built in disk spacers, but there on the outer perimeter, and they deflect the moving fluid toward the center, similar to the second version of his tesla turbine, but there on the outside. this would also give it more tourqe, and should be used to try and make a steam engine
if i had to guess, the permanganate decomposing in the ceramic matrix created superfine nanoparticles embedded all over the large surface area of the ceramic; this is actually the logic behind a lot of industrial catalysts. cool that it worked!
I love how when he figures out to use the old syringes and that pirates of the Caribbean esc music starts playing, the syringe popping out is a near perfect octave Above the key of the piece making it a perfect last note to the phrase.
My suggestion is…a “Best of Integza” video, featuring those “learning” moments. I’m sure there is enough to create a number of “learning” moments!!!
Wow. Great idea using the ceramic as a substrate for the catalist. Also, Jackie Chan is awesome, and tomatoes are delicious.
Definitely looking forward to one day seeing you attempt a variable thrust engine and mounting it to a model airplane or something
When you pushed the syringe out with compressed air it was such a satisfying POP sound ^^
Imagine a pyromaniac with a heavy Portuguese accent who hates tomatoes and loves Nicolas Tesla…
And I love it
This reminds me of "water bottle rockets" that simply push water out using compressed air.
Maybe try pressurising the air and peroxide in the same bottle before pushing it through the catalyst, removing the need for the syringe entirely.
Bearing in mind the system is gravity fed if you plan on using a horizontal test bed.
I want to see your motors make something fly!
This would work. It is done in real rockets too where there is no bladder/liner inside the propellant tank to keep pressurant separated from propellant. It just adds the requirement for ullaging to settle the propellant in the tanks. Apollo did this using the smaller rcs engines to apply a little forward thrust, the bipropellants for the AJ10-137 thus settled to the bottom of the tank.
So yeah, omitting the syringe and pressurizing the perozide container directly should work just fine.
Not a bad idea. Even just having a water section after the hydrogen peroxide/steam nozzle that the pressure built up forces the water out. Having the heavier mass be thrusted backwards will give a much higher impulse.
@@CharlieSolis that would be less efficient. You want your exhaust gasses/reaction medium coming out the nozzle to be as low mass and high velocity as possible.
awesome project
On i feel like making this out of steel for the “combustion chamber” would work quite well and you may be able to seal it better with threaded ends. That one way valve would be able to thread in and it wouldnt be able to jump off
Make a front well drive bicycle
So your KMnO4 is reacting with the H2O2 to make KOH (lye) and MnO2. The MnO2 that it makes will be super fine and have a massive amount of surface area which then the H2O2 can decompose on. Pretty cool stuff.
I like you funny words, magic man
KOH isn’t lye, NaOH is.
@@Alsry1 yes and no. If you're a chemist lye refers to the leachate of wood ash/pot-ash (this is where the name potassium comes from) which is predominantly KOH, so historically lye referred to KOH and not NaOH. You are correct though that lye now more so refers to NaOH as it is far cheaper to produce and has replaced KOH as the "household" alkali salt.
@@lunachable1 beat me to it
@@Mr_Reaps25 beat meat to it
Why have I never seen you channel before!? Time to go watch as many of your videos as I feasibly can.
I have to be honest, I didnt even know what the video was about but when I saw that Integza uploaded I knew it was going to be good and I immediately clicked
Video Idea: Now strap it to a Rocket (but reinforce the dang thing to withstand those pressures) , who cares if NASA wasn't built in 2 days, Integza Space Program was.
Built in 2 days... of 3D printing!
Mark Rober is literally a rocket engineer. He would have absolutely no problem getting his hands on PURE peroxide, as this is in fact a rocket fuel type still in use today. A very FUN fuel type in fact.
get your hands on a pipe, add kerosene, a little bit of peroxide, and ignite using a radio controller..
*you've successfully made a chemical pipe bomb !!!*
Integza your rocket it producing lots of O2, add fuel and a 3D printed nozzle and BOOM a rocket or possibly a large explosion. Either way it will be cool.
I was just thinking about that, the problem though is that most of this O2 is saturated with water vapor, so igniting it would be really hard, maybe if he could dry out the exhausted vapors it could turn into a legit combustion rocket engine
@@Mr.Paulo. that’s the thing gasses do not care about moister. Just look at when a propane vessel is on fire. No amount of water will put it out.
@@justinmolina4557 never thought about that, so he can just mix the engine's oxygen output with some propane and make basically a flamethrower? That's some freaking cool idea to try out
@@Mr.Paulo. my thought is that it would be a really high pressure exhaust. If he can contain the force it would be a a serious rocket.
Mark Rober: the recipe is too dangerous
Integza: N O
At this point you're into plumbing, which can be tricky. Thankfully RUclips has a fantastic certified plumber who can probably help. And he also has a bit of a thing for rockets, which might be helpful.
What I'm trying to say is that you should definitely look into doing a collaboration with Colin Furze about the next step :D
i support this idea
Video idea: You should do a “hand tool only challenge” rocket build with a budget of $30 and only allowed to use hand tools. Keep up the great work!
I mean a pcb pipe a hacksaw some duck tape and whatever you can get your hands on for fuel. Boom make shift rocket for less then 30 bucks made from hand tools.
@@halogeek6 a source of KNO3 (65pt) and granulated sugar (35pt) and oxidiser (if you want this is not required)
This was an great result. On each of these I would be curious how much of the thrust is accounted for by the energy put into the system by the pressurized air or whatever else is used to move the materials. I am also voting Integza as “Most Likely To Blow Himself Up”. Don’t want to see that of course but man o man I cringe at times! For the science!
Hello fellow racer!
I would say the air input only accounts for a tiny bit at the beginning, the plunger does keep it well separate from the chamber. Most of the thrust here is from the reaction making steam, just like the Heinkel rocket plane did with the same fuel combinations.
@@SeanBZA In this video I agree that the additional energy is minimal but in others it is significant
Great video as always!!! I'm wondering, with all that oxygen in the exhaust, could it be used directly to power a hybrid rocket like you made in other videos? Or maybe an afterburner?
Video idea: Could you do something with laminar flow! Always find it super interesting, and I wonder if you could print a laminar flow nozzle that would work for a light up display (to send a rocket through at some point!)
I remember when I was younger, I was consistently rinsing an item in hydrogen peroxide. I eventually set out a dish of hydrogen peroxide which I would drop the item into then retrieve it and use the same dish of hydrogen peroxide later. As young kids do, I forgot about it and went several days without using that bowl. When I finally used it again, it immediately burned (not flammably) the skin on my fingertips. The only logical assumption is that water evaporated and increased the concentration of the hydrogen peroxide. Why not try slowly evaporating hydrogen peroxide or using low heat to distill water off of it?
By that point, the peroxide should have decomposed into water.
*Idea: You should extract hydrogen from water* *and use it as fuel.*
Yesh
Hmm 🤔
This is so awesome. You should totallu try making a radial engine using similar ingredients as your turbo jet engine. I want to attempt to make my own jet engine in the future. Your videos have been a great resource!
Why not try printing a gas powered nozzle capable of accelerating air through the speed of sound, you could then combine such a nozzle with most of your other rocket or jet exhaust allowing you to greatly increase the exit velocity and so improve the amount of thrust produced. A way to do this would be to take a compressor fan/centrifugal fan like the one you used for the afterburner and use it in much the same way as in that video to produce a stream of higher pressure air, then pass this into a sufficiently converging nozzle, this will take you up to the speed of sound. The harder part is then to get the diverging nozzle on the other side to expand at the correct rate leading to supersonic flow through the bell, and then maybe some nice images of some mach diamonds out the back.
The idea is good, but it wouldn't work with any commercial EDF and most DIY centrifugal fans cause De-Laval nozzles start working at pressure ratios of at least 2.5 (Chamber Pressure / Ambient Pressure), but EDF's can't go beyond 0.1 atm overpressure. To get the required pressure ratio you would need a multistage axial compressor like in a real turbo-jet engine.
Idea is good, but first the chamber / plumbing has to stop blowing up :D I think you are skipping ahead here
*VIDEO IDEA FROM IKIA*
Connect a mini canon to your turbo boosted jet with a Seal in between when there is enough pressure of exhaust the seal will break yeeting the load 👍
I got an idea for a future project. You should use one of your rocket engines and actually make a rocket that flys.
I agree
thats crazy talk.
Yes
integza is like the Electroboom of engineering
or is electroboom the integza of electrical engineering....
the question of life
I wouldn't recommend using plastic gloves when burning things, if a hot flame or a drop of hot liquid, in fact, if anything hot reaches your gloves, the latex will melt and you'll have a great tale to tell when you go camping with your friends and family. Other than that, great video as always.
I just bought my first 3d printer. I'm trying to learn everything I can so hopefully I'll be inventing and experimenting as well!
i was thinking of getting one myself, but can I get a good one for about $200??? prolly not :(
@@Nobe_Oddy creality ender 3pro
At this rate, I'm thinking you will have a running rocket suit prototype by next year this time 😉
Love your dedication.
Keep up the good work.
As someone who knew very little about rocketry when I started watching your channel, it's exciting to see the progression of your rocket designs! Can't wait to see the next iteration of your devil's toothpaste rocket, or DTR, which given the initials I think you should henceforth refer to as Dietrich.
Video idea💡: You should make some project's related to Arduino.
Arduino ➕Rockets🚀=🤯🤯
And yeah: Tomatoes are disgusting 🤢🤢
Good one 👍
Tom from explosions and fire 🔥 is the shit he is legitimately one of the smartest youtubers that’s underrated cuz he’s a bit of a pyro 🧨 haha
Him and StyroPyro are geniuses
@@SegwayBossk yo wnna roast some marshmallows in my laser oven?
@@monkemonke9048 hell yeah
Video idea: workshop tour including the types of machines and 3d printers you use. Anyway love your videos and keep up the great content.
Nice - you basically built a H2O2 based monopropellant rocket engine! Though your thrust in this design is capped by your maximum chamber pressure, which is limited by your maximum injection pressure which in this case is 4 bar due to your "fuel pump" design - which if i recall correctly has been used in the past by I think soviet rockets. (top of the tank as a piston head to pressurize the fuel above using pressurized gas as a driving force). A very simple and elegant solution.
With your Ethanol / H2O2 / Permanganate experiments you by the way almost had a replica of a WW2 German V2 Rocket engine. Using H2O2 via Permanganate catalyst to drive a turbo pump that feeds an Ethanol / Water mixture and Liquid Oxygen into the chamber of the engine (water was added to reduce exhaust temperature because of problems with nozzle disintegration)
Integza I would love to see a video on the magnus effect because its a really cool topic :)
You should make a rocket using this and launch it to space
0_0
Maybe find a slightly slower, steady reaction to produce the steam and use the steam to run a Tesla turbine powering a propeller. If you can make a light enough high pressure catalyst container, you may be able to get a longer running engine than just the short blast rocket engine.
I don't think you needed to stop using the CO² cylinders, just find a way to control the pressure.
Needs some feedback, a pressure sensor somewhere that feeds into an MCU that can control a gas regulator of some sort.
With a super high sampling rate on the pressure tool be able to actually control it down at the microsecond level.
In fact I think a lot of things on this engine could stand to feedback into a controller and keep everything in line.
Chamber pressure, peroxide pump pressure, acceleration and velocity just to start with.
You might even be able to add an emergency shutdown for when something spikes without input, a runaway pressure change in the decomposer for instance.
Then you can have it all laid out at the end of the recording and tied against the video and whatever control units the MCU makes.
Eventually this will end up controlling the thrust vectoring for when you prototype a vertical rocket.
And you can send a crash stop shutdown command wirelessly to the machine too.
Ultimately this system can be upgraded to the point that it can perform landing operations too.
Would love to see a measurement on how much thrust this actually creates!
Yes start static thrust measurements...
you should 3d print a 3d printer:)
Great idea
Wow
Dope
Lmao
@@thefatmanhaslanded thx
Project Idea: Maybe try to make a "professional" water rocket before building a chemical one, something that would fly hundreds of meters, you could even test it with an aerospike nozzle (or hydrospike?)!. I think it would help you develop the final version of a chemical rocket.
Do you remember your compressed air engine video Integza? You should try and make an RC plane that uses one and make it fly. If your going to go for a CO2 propellant maybe try adding some pressure regulating valve so that it doesn't come out as fast and without solid chunks of CO2 while also having it at a slight downward angle and use the bigger 88g CO2 cartridge instead of the small 12g you have used before. Alternatively maybe a metal steel container that you could compress air into. I remember Slingshot channel making insane contraption that could take huge amounts of air pressure safely, thought it is heaver so you might need glider size wings to be able to lift that.
"This is not safe." - _A madman intent on gleefully continuing what he is doing._
Catalyzer sounds like a serum that some evil genius (named, ohhh, I dunno, Integza) developed to turn people into cats. Maybe that should your next video: developing the catalyzer.
"This Integza guy thinks he can beat my Catinator with his Catalyzer?? Ha! Perry the Platypus? Where did you come from?" - Dr. Doofenschmirtz
Wow, this really shows how powerful Devil's toothpaste is, even at such a small level. Lots of respect to both of you!
A larger check valve seems obvious I guess but im super glad you put in a direction change like that mid video! Totally made me what to follow allong more.
Video idea : now that you have mastered the art of devil's toothpaste, you can build a canon out of it. Quite the same setup as this video except that the chamber is standing still while shooting something ! (Like tomatoes for example 😈)
You should add some support rings to the chamber, and then maybe attach the one way valve to that structure so that way is not only the glue that is securing it
Fires! Explosions! Questionable safety! And a little bit of success. Thoroughly enjoyed, and as always, I enjoy watching you get better.