Support Blogging Theology on Patreon: / bloggingtheology Buy Me a Coffee: www.buymeacoffee.com/blogging... My Paypal Link: www.paypal.com/paypalme/blogg...
It is my responsibility to aware every one Quran is the last book of God which revealed on prophet Muhammad saw quran is the only source of guidance in whole world quran will show you the right path quran also verify bible and torah and other scripture kindly once time you study whole quran and aware yourself from the aim of life and got success in long run ❤❤
maybe it was BECAUSE your grandad was there as an occupier and representative of war criminals and genocidal maniacs like Churchill that he felt that way. My dad was there for two years during WWII and was forever sympathetic to the Palestinians. Maybe it was because my dad was from Cyprus, occupied by the murdering British Empire.
I don't mean this in a disrespectful way to your grandpa but your grandpa and what he repeated there in Palestine was the core issue and problem, why was a Brit born in the rolling meadows of the English country side in someone else's land upholding a policy by people who enjoyed blood pudding, 2000 miles away , creating and upholding a policy against an indigenous people , in their land , who who absolutely wanted nothing to do with blood pudding , being oppressed by people who had no business being there, do you understand how fundamentally immoral that is?
Arab Christians, Muslims and Jews lived in peace until the end of ww1 as I remember reading various examples of their collaborations for freedom before and during Ww1
@@georgeh8937 Jewish were happy and respectful in the arabic lands, there were no problem at all untill the Zionism project appear under lies and false alligation. then the Zionism made conflict in other arabic countries (such as in Egypt zionism bombed a Jewish cinema and pretend that the arab did it in purpose to obligate the jewish to leave Egypt) to obligate jewish to leave their countries and come to Palestine. as many jewish like other christians and muslems considered that they are living in their countries and did not want to move to Palestine. Even in Palestine there are many strories how the jewish lived side by side with the Muslims and christians like brothers before the Slavians ( Russia, Ukrania and other east and west european jewish) come to Palestine and steal the land and ID as Semitic. take a look in the RUclips what the real jewish says ( jewish anti zionism, Naturikarta, JVP. etc.
2:59 Britain did not do this first. The Germans bombed Warsaw and Rotterdam as they invaded Poland and the Netherlands. It was only a matter of time before they bombed Britain. The Germans started the war and started the aerial bombing. To lay that at the door of Winston Churchill is absurd and dishonest.
When you mentioned that Churchill authorized the bombing of a German city before the Nazis bombed british civilians, you did not mention that, before this bombing, Hitler directed the Luftwaffe to bomb a dutch city, after the Netherlands announced their surrender, because it was perceived to be too slow for the Nazis. Since this action was a violation of Germany's announcement, along with Britain and France, not to bomb civilians, Churchill changed Britain's war strategy. Why didn't you mention this important fact?
Well, the fact is that Germany bombed Rotterdam on May, threatening with leveling Utrecht next; that's when the Netherlands surrendered. The bombings of civilian targets both in Germany and England only started in August. Now, I found conflicting recounts about who bombed who first, so I wouldn't stick my neck out over that one.
He also totally ignored the facts that at the end of the battle of Britain the nazis switched from targeting RAF bases and focused on London and other civilian centres. It was that action that allowed the RAF enough respite to recover slightly and win the day.
Wikipedia: "Strategic bombing during World War II began on 1 September 1939 when Germany invaded Poland and the Luftwaffe (German Air Force) began bombing Polish cities and the civilian population in an aerial bombardment campaign."
One interesting fact for you Paul: Marmaduke Pickthall, the famous British writer, translator and Muslim convert who was born in 1875 was a "classmate and friend" of Winston Churchill at Harrow School, the prestigious boarding school in England. They both shared a similar "social" status as members of the "upper class", however, they had very different views on politics, religion and culture. Pickthall, being a devout Muslim, was a sympathizer of the Ottoman Empire and also the Indian independence movement (Did Tariq Ali mention this?), while Churchill was a staunch imperialist and colonialist.
@@aftabnaveed lol your name is aftab.. he even gave remarks against Islam and you are supporting him? He was a monster who was fighting against another monster... The another Austrian monster was lesser evil than Churchill because Austrian painter knew about je ews traitors who backed western allies at that time... 3-4 million Bengalis died out of starvation because he diverted essential supplies from the civilians in Bengal to sturdies Europeans... When People writing to him that people are dying he replied why hasn't Gandhi died yet? He compared Indians with animals and he also said that there was nothing wrong in colonization of America Australia he said that a greater race took over another... Is this your favourite?
Our uncle served in Palestine after WW2. He said they were not terrified of the arabs but of the terrorists on the other side. The murder of British squaddies and then the booby trapping of their bodies to inflict maximum mayhem and murder had something to do with this but also generally having potshots taken at them constantly. They came out of WW2 having fought Nazism and were exhausted. Why on earth are those squaddies and the ones killed at the King David hotel not commemorated each year on Remembrance Sunday? Britain is losing its sense of self these days.
@@khaledkhatib5116 "I am a Palestinian". In what sense exactly? "The Zionist terror started way before 1948" I know. The terror of buying swamp lands Arabs didn't want at inflated prices, only to then be invaded, raped and murdered by Arab marauders. But let's not call them Arabs. Let's call them "Palestinians". Why not take credit for those murders, as Hamas gleefully did so recently?
Considering Britain's betrayal of the Jews in British created Palestine, who had just seen millions of their own people exterminated in Europe, I'd be a little afraid of the Jews too. There is just so much Jew hate the Jews are going to put up with from antisemitic ingrates. As for the title of this little video screed, no one really used the expression, "the Palestinians and the Jews" during the Mandate, because "Palestinian" was a "national" category invented by Britain, and not really accepted by the Arabs of that time, but embraced by the Jews of the mandate. And of course before the British creation of Palestine, no people ever called itself the "Palestinians". BTW, with all due respect to your dead uncle, the Arabs had committed plenty of violence against the Jews, not just during the mandate but long before, even there in the land of the Jews, i.e., the Land of Israel, as its true indigenous people called it long before the European empire known as Rome imposed the name of another people of European derivation, the Philistines, on the land of the Jews. And as for the use of "Palestinians" to describe the Arabs of Palestine in this video? That's an alleged people was actually invented in the 1960s by the Soviets and the Egyptian, Yasser Arafat.
Well he is right, Churchill did lead a small bombing raid while Operation Sea Lion was in its flow. While it did not do anything severe, hitler went crazy
Say what you like, from the comfort of your armchair. When you are surrounded by murderous neighbours, all the nuances of your history disappear rapidly up your rear end.
If you read your history. Churchill did not want to be too tough on the Germans after WW1. He already had a deep understanding of history, in fact more than most. He was a colossus of his age and is one today.
Apologetics & revisionism (and in essence, a kind of neo-imperialism) for those convinced the Muslim-Arab mind will never open, will never start thinking hard about why the Muslim-Arab world is so messed up.
Next week's discussion: how the 7th century Arabs came out of the Arabian peninsula and how they conquered and colonized the Levant, all of North Africa, and southern Spain.
Excellent video except for one small but crucial missing descriptor. The Jews referred to in this entire exposé are white, European, or Ashkenazi Jews. And one of those qualifiers is a required prefix in every case. The “Arab Jews” who were already living peacefully in the Middle East were not considered or consulted in this colonial scheme. The entire affair was a 100% European project. And although native Jews were brought in later to bulk up the Jewish population, they were (and to some extent still are) treated poorly, disrespected, and discriminated against. Today the European Jews are still the mainstay of established power in Israel.
Absolutely. The long standing peaceful relationship of Jews who lived not only in Palestine but in Iraq and other parts of the Middle East was destroyed. Jews were forced to move to Israel from other Middle Eastern countries and became poor second class citizens, forced to leave their homes and business and become refugees. Britain is responsible for much of the misery not only in the Middle East but also in India and Pakistan where you can also see the idea of chopping up land according to arbitrary so called religious preferences and thus have created the modern world of unrest and terror where once was peace we now have generations of misery.
I only just got to you mentioning how Churchil allowed the bombing of civilian areas in Germany. Haven't the Germans done the same? By the way, it was only considered a war crime since the Geneva convention in 1949. That's 4 years after WWII has finished. And what's Ali's opinion of Hamas and Hizballa shooting missiles into civilian Israeli areas on purpose? Is that ok?
Imagine raving alongside the biggest concentration camp on Earth, and then imagine still claiming victimhood after you had massacred almost 40 times, and wounded almost double that, more of the people you have been holding in apartheid prison for decades prior? Many Jews are also standing up to what Israel is doing, perfectly aware of the fact that Holocaust (committed by Europeans, by the way) is being used to justify the ongoing Gaza Genocide.
I wonder if the esteemed historian who wrote this book about Churchill will write the equivalent book about other leaders of the past. Maybe some historical figure from the Middle East? Not sure why that area came to mind. There must be historically important leaders from there, although none come to mind immediately. Doubtlessly none from there ever did anything ruthless or killed anyone. Very peaceful area after all.
It is my responsibility to aware every one Quran is the last book of God which revealed on prophet Muhammad saw quran is the only source of guidance in whole world quran will show you the right path quran also verify bible and torah and other scripture kindly once time you study whole quran and aware yourself from the aim of life and got success in long run ❤❤❤❤
@RussianFans-vn6cj Galatians 5 10 I trust as to you in our Master that you will NOT consider OTHER BELIEFS, but that the one troubling you shall bear the judgment, whoever he may be. xref-2 Galatians 4 9 But now, knowing Elohim, but rather being known by Elohim, how do you turn again to the weak and poor principles to which you desire again to come under their bondage (note) xref-1 These were people who were before patterning pagan cultic practices and now came to faith in YHWH and are now known by YHWH and were turning back to the former pagan practices. Galatians 1 6 I am surprised at how soon you have turned to another good news, away from Messiah who has called you to grace.
Maybe because Churchill is put in a pedestal and Britons are still living in a delusion that they are somehow civilised when in fact then murdered, pillaged and looted more than most other nationalities.
Tariq Ali Ramadan was not only an ANTISEMITE, very clever with his discourse. Please read "Brother Tariq" by Caroline Fourest (not a Jew) He was the grandson of Hasan al-Banna, Founder of the Muslim Brtotherhood, and the apologist for Jihad.
Anyone criticizes Zionists fascism becomes anti-Semite, as per white askhanazi colonial settlers. When Zionists see truth hurts they fling the anti-Semitic coin. The most funny but inhumanly cruel people on earth are Zionists
There is a very famous quote from Churchill. I think when he was in the Colonial Office, along the lines (paraphrasing): "The Jews seem to think that we can just get rid of the Arabs to suit them." At this point he was openly critical of the concept of Zionism. Very interestingly, despite being such a well-known quote, it seems to have been completely excised from history. There are people today who are actively trying to deny the facts of history, that before WWI and during the interwar period, the Palestine Mandate territory was an area heavily populated with settled Arab farmers, and that the Jewish population was a tiny minority. A demographic map of the region was drawn up in 1910 for the British government by Maunsell. This shows that the Palestine Mandate territory was the largest area of settled Arab agriculture in the Mashreq. It also shows the minute areas of settled Jewish agriculture. In 1947 at the onset of the creation of the modern state of Israel, only about a third of the population in the Palestine Mandate territory was Jewish, and most of those had only arrived since 1941. An ethno-nationalist Jewish state could only be created in a region where Jews were a minority by the ethnic cleansing of hundreds of thousands of Arabs. This was carried out at gun point by the hard men of Irgun, Hagganah and the Stern Gangs. Men brutalised by their experiences in WW2 on the eastern front. These are simply the facts of history which are forbidden in the USA and highly supressed across the west. I see many American videos on here recently, pretending that the Jews have been the majority population of the territory for all of the last 2000 years. This is either dishonest or extremely ignorant.
I think the NAZIs were guilty not only of genocide of the Jews but also of brutalizing the Jews to the Palestinian Arabs. By "Jews"., I mean Jews, worldwide. The Jews of the 1940s just did not want to know what the Arab population was at that time. The Jews just wanted to establish Israel, and did not care because I believe they felt that what had be done to them in Europe gave them license to do anything. I believe that such, too, is the attitude of Israelis today.
There is no such thing as a historical Palestinian state or Palestinian people. There were Arabs living in the Levant who settled there after the Arab Conquest in 739 AD. Arabs in the Levant were descendants of Arabs conquerors who colonized the Levant.
So what? It is completely irrelevant to the whole issue. If someone comes to your home pushes you off your farm at gun point, hands your land over to foreign immigrants who have only just arrived in the country, then bulldozes your village rebuilds a new one with another name. Stages massacres and terror to drive you and your people out of your homes, then claims none of this happened, If you are angry of fight back you are told you have no right to be angry and that you are only fighting back because you are 'racist', is that something you would accept yourself? If it happened to you? Say in the partition? The reason for a Palestinian state has nothing to do with some abstract historical argument about nationality. The "Two States" solution is a way to bring peace, to find a formula to end the blood feud which will otherwise go on generation after generation. The Israelis were INVADERS. They invaded the country and started this war. It is a simple fact that no one group of people want to live under another group of people. The Israelis do NOT wish to live under an Arab government, that is why they conducted mass ethnic cleansing. The Arabs do not want to live under the Israelis, which is the reality of what is happening now. Only the "Two State" solution brings any hope for peace, but you reject it, why? It is the extremists of Hamas and the Israeli hard right-wing who reject the "Two State" solution, and who want to escalate the war to a final solution of exterminating totally the other. You are supporting this. You have no reason for your point of view except your own irrational hate of Muslims. If you are not an Israeli or a Palestinian (person born in the Palestine mandate territory , or a child of a refugee from there), then why do you choose sides. Foreigners who choose sides in other people's conflicts are usually doing it for their own selfish reasons. @@siddude
@@siddudeNot according to DNA studies of archaeological sites. Even if what you state is true (and it isn’t) what does it matter in 1917 or 1948 or 2023 what was going on in 739? What a foolish comment.
Next time you want to discuss Winston Churchill, you might want to include Winston Churchill in the discussion. Catholics were not very popular in England, sort of like Hindus in Saudi Arabia? Arabs are white or brown depending on what ever propaganda purpose you wish to serve at the moment.
You forgot about christian Poland, which invited Jews as early as in XII century, and made them welcome for over 700 years, and able to create their own cities (Kazimierz), which means there is more to blame than christianity
Brilliant i have read the book its fascinating insight of imperialism . He was a ardent racist and imperialist.He hated the working classes and was ready to get the military to kill when they striked in London on the railways! To think of him as anything other than a a racist imperial is astonishing!He was also of the most unpopular pm in England but later became a hero just at the end of war! Everybody should know about how callous he was! Bury my heart at wounded heart is also good to read it has many parallel with what is happening in 🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸
Following the game plan laid out at the British 1st Imperial Press Conference of 1909, and representing Rothschild interests, J.P Morgan proxies purchased the top 25 most influential publications in the United States in 1915. They then used their editorial control to drive U.S. public opinion into the First World War on the side of the Allied Powers. As a reward, the British cabinet approved the Balfour Declaration promising Baron Rothschild it would endeavor to create a homeland for Jews in Palestine. Now, jump forward to the 1950’s, when the CIA used Operation Mockingbird to penetrate U.S. media, as well as various USG, state, and even certain metropolitan agencies. Today, nearly all U.S. legacy media is controlled by just five conglomerates, all of which are ultimately controlled by the Deep State, which came to power behind the scenes via JFK's assassination in 1963. That is why the JFK assassination is regarded as the Third Rail in American Journalism. The Democratic Party has become its political wing, and the MSM is now little more than its propaganda arm.
its wrong to assume that Churchills views were those of the English workingman, they werent, he was appointed during the war because extraordinary times require extraordinary measures, but when he was elected PM in 1950 and it came down to policies the British public couldn't get rid of him quick enough, i read his biography (or one of them) and he seemed an incredibly self aggrandizing character, I was expecting every chapter to end with, "naturally, I had the last laugh and they were sorry"
These are the views of the British government and laws. This is part of your history all over the world. You believe that you are better than everyone else in the world. Look where your country has been they is miserable conditions xenophobic bigotry racist white supremacy nationalism agenda. America 🇺🇸 Africa, Latin America, Asia and Australia 🇦🇺. Your greed for power enrichment of your country in the name of your racism in the name of god save the king.
You are correct. My late father (1920 - 2016) disliked Churchill for his politics and his class. However, my father begrudgingly accepted that Churchill was the man for the moment in WW2. Its always worth noting that early to mid 20th century Britain was, across all society, racist but not in a violent way more of white Britains are superior sort of way. It was normal. Now things are different.
Regarding Churchill’s thoughts on former colonies needing guidance, I think it’s worth noting all former colonies, in Mideast and Africa, upon independence and many under Islamist rule have fallen to chaos and ruin
British/US colonialism's legacy to the "3rd" world, the term itself being obviously racist btw... with Palestine being the masterpiece, a humanitarian crisis conceptualised and materialised largely by the British, gj. You could say everything you touch turns to shit, like Mida's touch in reverse!
Racism is not a lifestyle choice, or, is it?..I think I spot it, well enough in others, but bad neighbours are a fact of life...(My neighbours don't think a great deal of me, I'm sure?), but I think I'm a great bloke, (within reason), but, don't we all?..
@Marya2476 the jews came in and bought property legallly in the 1880's... in the 1900's BEFORE The British arrived there were already problems. So there is that.
@@Marya2476 oh marya. must you invent excuses for islam? the reality was the palestine region was not important to the turkish rulers. it was pretty desolate. palestine had 200,000 people. the empire had 20,000,000 people. so a hundred times more.
Ottomans ruled not on basis of other nations but religious confessions. And Yes they were all independent from sultan and islam. Just taxed additionally if no muslim
Thanks to Churchill we won the war against the nazis. Germans could have surrender early, but they didn't, and the bombing seems to have been necessary. Similarly, after Hamas horrific attack on jews, it was predictable that Israeli will attempt to demolish the military headquarters of Hamas, and warn them in advance so that the civilians could flee, but Hamas made this impossible, and is entirely responsible of the death of the Palestinians, which they simply called "martyr", like in their chart they consider women as martyrs factory. We, europeans and Americans, have to stand up for all democracies when attacked by autocracies, even more so when they have inherited nazism. The chart of Hamas is even worse than "Mein Kampf", if that is possible, as they want to destroy all Christians, and to obliterate the women's right. This video contains many truth, but seems to abstract them from the context, and lack much comparisons with the enemy of the time, and today's.
bombing civilians was still a war crime and Germany was held responsibe at Nuremberg 1946 but the Allies were not held responsible because they won WWII.
@@Utubexpert-kx7ew The Allies were not held mainly because in that particular case, it was the only way to win the war. They would have surrendered, there would have been no need to bombing the German cities. The goal was to win the war, not some retaliation of hate toward German civilians, which have been helped a lot after the war.
After most Arab nations expelled their Jewish populations in the late 40's, the influx into Israel of these Mizrahi Jews outnumbered the "white Ashkenazim". These Jewish refugees from Arab lands also outnumbered the Palestinian refugees, a fact not commonly known.
The idea was to populate Israel with as many and with any kind of Jew as possible in order to strengthen it. From India, at first only white Jews were accepted, then after a lot of debate the Bene-Israel Jews were accepted. They were of mixed Indian race and came to India long before the so called white jews from Persia. Indian Jews left in their droves for a better’ life after being fed heavy Israeli propaganda. They were also deeply in love with the idea of having a nation of their own. Tariq is right. Anglo Indian Christians generally abused jews, a throwback to colonial times.
Sure it’s commonly known , if you ask a Jew in Israel whatever they’re from most are from Iraq, Syria, Lebanon etc.they’re not all Europeans .. the question is why were the expelled from their homelands to be put like rats in Israel
The truth is he was born in the Victorian era and at the height of the of the British Empire. As much as people condemn him and shout "war crimes" at him, his views were explainable given his upbringing and background. This is not to say these were not terrible, because they were, but that history grows from the past and he was a product of his past - like we all are. There was good and bad in him, as it is with all of us.
@@user-qj8pc4dv7g Do you really believe india didn't have schools??? no they built english schools .strange how they are doing better without us then, did japan bring britain into the moden world in the late 20th century??? i bet you have never claimed that.
@@user-qj8pc4dv7g if britain was still looting india, do you think the indians would now be owning some of the uk s most prostigious car marques?? oh! that's right in your view we would have given them our car marques because we are so effin good to them.
Mr. Tarique Ali is using 21st century standards to judge a 19th century man. Yes, Churchill was an imperialist. In Churchills’ time, most European leaders were imperialists.
He's also pointing out things that are true that most people don't know. Also, many people in Churchill's own time disliked his attitudes and actions. What about the objections to the East India Company and ti slavery in the 18th and 19th centuries? What standards were they using?
Not really, when history is controlled by the ruling class, not much history gets out. Consequentially, when that true history becomes known, it's not judging by a standard that did not exist before . It's simply allowing the truth to be known, and speak for itself. You can't judge what was unreported or unknown. That's sort of like judging Leopold who slaughter millions by 21st century standards. It's not, the same moral standard existed when he did it. Those of the latter centuries just didn't know it. When they found out, they simply let it be known. That's what happened in the USAMERICA when folks started using the net to research some of those confederate statues. They found out the inscriptions beneath the statues were entire false. BTW, I'm not in favor of removing these monuments, as long as you prints some of the real truths beneath them.
The capital city of Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, the best and longest road, the main street named after Winston Churchill!🏆 That speaks louder than what you trying to portray about Churchill. I think he was someone who were blessed 🙌 come on he had bitten Nazi and Musoluni 😮🏆👏
How much self-hatred could a privileged Westerner have. It’s always amazing to me. Britain (under Churchill) stood alone against Hitler and kept Western Europe free.
It’s sad that there’s so many groups of people who are too cowardly to realize that there’s a legacy of protecting the holy land, the knights Templar rejected people in their journey to the holy land, and the holy land itself knowingly that it would be taken over by the caliphate if they let their guard down and it was also honorable to protect all the different ethnicities, traveling throughout and indigenous to the area even Thomas Jefferson, who is also being maligned these days by much special interest as they are trying to vilify Churchill what are these guys supposed to do just except the Muslim takeover in their day of things that many people rightfully hold sacred so we’re just supposed to let the caliphate take over or be a threat to the whole world like the Barbary pirates and enslaved people in their Arab KKK supremacy nonsense religion that’s a false religion than actually rewrite the Bible and disregard the gospel
American native populations of many tribes like Kenia 30:22 now outnumber the figure from 200yrs ago. Can we conclude no ethnic clensing took place.. Hahaha
it is very emotional for me as an Arab with a Palestinian mother to hear the atrocities said and done by such men but my belief is that every passing day truths are reviled and the tide will turn in our favor InshaaAllah, but the difference is as Muslims we would never commit such evils and we will stick to our Islamic code of honor. Thank you very much Paul for this great upload may Allah bless you.
Yeah muslims never commit evils xD Go look at what Muslims did in India or how many slaves they had and how they treated them. But what to expect from someone thinking the perfect man fucks 9yo
We Muslim do commit crimes these days and don't adhere to Islamic values. Let's look at ourselves and correct it. Arabs have lots of problems not to mention the corrupt leadership
All religions commit such evils. That is evidenced by tens of thousands of accounts and written documentations be them perpetrated by Jews, Christians, or Muslims
Dr. Paul, I am an Arab Muslim. I have a request, which is that I would like to support the content that your channel publishes with a correct Arabic translation. If you have people who are fluent in Arabic and English so that we can understand the content, there are Arabs who follow your blessed channel... May God protect you and reward you with goodness and grant you a good life in this world and in Paradise. Satisfaction in the afterlife.
Tariq Ali is a Pakistani-British political activist and a member of the editorial committee of the New Left Review. Winston Churchill was a British patriot that saved the free world from Nazi tyranny. Paul Williams, the presenter of this video has also presented videos "My journey to Islam", and "Becoming Muslim".
It is my responsibility to aware every one Quran is the last book of God which revealed on prophet Muhammad saw quran is the only source of guidance in whole world quran will show you the right path quran also verify bible and torah and other scripture kindly once time you study whole quran and aware yourself from the aim of life and got success in long run ❤❤❤
What the fuck is that profile name? And that pity comment.... You're not even trying to be clever with you deception Muslim boi... The Christians will have fight you. All all this shit because of the nature of your religion...
Huge chunk of Hindu land today call Islamic Pakistan an Islamic terror heaven Byzantine citadels of Orthodox Christian today call Turkey??? Zoroastrian Iran Assyrian Christian Iraq Syria Coptic Christian Egypt Buddhist Afghanistan all under illegal Islamic occupation 57 Islamic nations and yet you Muslims crying over a sliver of land call Israel? Shame on you Muslims Jews Christians pagans totally extirpated from Arabia Sorry the civilized world must unite and stand up to these Islamic bullies
Boring boring response to muslims if you dont like us just get lost useless key board warriors.Christianity. has no clout now or essence it sold itself to the devil!
@@MuhammadHasbullah07 Amen aimmin is from the ancient Egyptian God Amon Ra Moses brought it out of Egypt Is Ra El Is= ISIS Ra= Amon Ra El= ancient Phoenician God Free Palestine from Hamas Free Balochistan from Islamic Pakistan
It's astonishing how the British press and Media refuse to discuss the Balfour declaration that has put the Palastenians and the Jewish people on a 75 year collision course. Not a single Journalist. TV channel or newspapaer wants to discuss it.
It's actually often brought up but usually just in passing because they realize that most people won't have the patience or interest in learning about the entire history in all of its details, and prefer to stick to their preferred narratives.
Churchil did what needed to be done to stop Hitler. There is nothing more to say about it. War is ugly, innocent people die and suffer. This is why tha blame falls on the one who starts it.
Dear brother, could you devote a video to talk to us in some detail about the positions of Arab leaders regarding the plans related to the establishment of Isr ael?
This analysis of the treatment of the Jews in the Muslim world would have benefited greatly from even a superficial research effort which would demonstrate that antisemitism is by no means a uniquely Christian phenomenon. In different time periods the treatment of Jews has varied significantly the world over. Accordingly, there are numerous cases of antisemitism under Muslim rule, such as the 1066 Grenada massacre and in the 1656 Jewish expulsion from Isfahan (along with many other waves of expulsions and forced conversions). All of this is not to mention that - even though the majority of Jew hatred once came from a Christian populous - the countries that hold the most antisemitic views in the world today are more often than not Muslim majority countries. We could determine this by using a number of different metrics but as we've mentioned expulsions already let's start there. The most recent expulsions of Jewish populations have been from countries such as Yemen, Morocco, Egypt, Iraq, Algeria, Libya, and Lebanon. In total nearly a million Jews were expelled from or fled from Islamic countries in the 1940s and the 1950s. In many cases these communities had established traditions in these countries, going back hundreds or even thousands of years (there is archaeological evidence of Jews living in Baghdad as far back as the early sixth century BCE). This may help explain why the current Jewish population in Israel is majority Mizrachi or Sephardi ('Non-white' Jews who lived in the Middle East and North Africa). Although of course there are also sizable 'white' population in Israel, but many of them are the descendants of holocaust survivors so the theory that they are 'privileged' could also do with a swift rejection of that particular null hypothesis. As to your take on Churchill, it is too great of an undertaking to contextualize each of the misleading statements you put forth so I will just say a couple things. First, the trouble at understanding why Churchill referred to the 'Jewish race' and not to the 'English race' as the 'best race' may be understood as an homage to the indebtedness he felt the British owed to the moral and technical contributions that Jews and Judaism had made and that we only feel uneasy with his language because he was using terms that did not yet have the negative connotation they hold for us modern viewers today. If we judge people of the past by modern standards we generally find them lacking because we are not in the same context they were in, we rarely have taken the time to learn about that context, and we (hopefully) have developed morally in the meantime, at least in certain respects. Second, I think that a lot of the examples of 'racism' that were brought up could be far better understood through the lens of paternalism rather than race hatred. He certainly believed that there were different levels of technological and civilization development, but I would suggest that scientific and developmental indices agree.
Dear friend: you seem to have a deep understanding of Jew history. Maybe you can answer this for me: Why? Why is it that Jews are so poorly treated or even driven out from everywhere? This is a honest question, I'm not anti-semite or anything of the sort. It's true that we don't have many Jews here in Spain... (we drove them out 4 hundred years ago).
I am European(British), and spent much of my adult life married to an American Jewish woman. I asked her and a number of her family members the same question, as to why are Jewish people the most picked on people in History. Also why is it that even the most mild question about the behavior of the Israeli settlers in the west bank, brings about accusations of me being anti sematic. As an outsider that cares about the future of the Jewish people, I think Jewish people need to stop calling your self the chosen ones and realize you are not special and just like the rest of us. As unless you do you will spend your future at war with someone somewhere in the world.@@leslie-annmills-gomez8763
Regardless of any race "contribution" to the society, NO ONE has the right to call a race "superior" to other! That should be the fundamental morality of any HUMAN!!! Stop trying to distract from this principle!
Unless I misheard, England and America didn't bomb Dresden until very late 1944 / early 1945. This was several years after Hitler ferociously bombed England in the so-called Battle of Britain. In other words, Hitler and Germany started everything, including WWII.
Has anyone heard of the kafala system? The system in saudi arabia, kuwait, jordan, regions in the middle east...run by muslims who are recruiting poor women from africa and asia. As house workers. Its modern day slavery. Those woman and sometimes children have no rights. The people who bought them take thier passports. They are not allowed phones or to leave the house unless someones with them. These woman gets abused, bought and sold like animals. And kuwait has the best laws towards it in the region. Hopefully that changes some day.
This is an excellent example of revisionist history, in which a relatively few historically accurate facts are mixed in with many unsupported allegations and much innuendo and inference to create a false narrative of history supporting a particular political ideology. Well done, Sir!
Revisionism is just taking another look at history focusing on the understanding that people of the past were capable of lies and propaganda. Just because it disagrees with your current perceptions of history and your race, doesn't make it automatically wrong.
A couple of facts of relevance: 1. Winston Churchill was the first vice-president of the racist and elitist Eugenics Education Society, founded by Charles Darwin's cousin Francis Galton and son Major Leonard Darwin. 2. The eugenics doctrines had profound influence on the treatment of dark-skinned people and indigenous people in all the British colonies. 3. Churchill, like the British Monarchs George v and VI, was a Freemason.
David Irvine's books have great insight into Churchils funding during the wilderness years when he was not in parliment and his paymasters (handlers) , his alcoholism .And also his attempt to bomb germany with anthrax .A great insight and excellent read . especialy the abdication of the king and refusal to let anyone read the offer of peace from the NSDAP .
David Irving has been totally discredited as a historian. He is a known NAZI sympathizer and has had judicial judgements that found he manipulated/obscured or just plain lied to present the NSDAP in a good light.
David Irvine is wrong, Churchill was without a seat in parliament for a very short time, lost his original seat and picked up a seat in a bye election not long after
@@gregsutton6258 Following the Tory electoral defeat in 1929, Churchill lost his seat and spent much of the next 11 years out of office, mainly writing and making speeches 1929 to 1939 is a decade how long do you think is a very long time in a political career vacation 🤣 Did you even read Irvines book ? In fact have you EVER READ A BOOK 🤣
@@gregsutton6258 Really ? Following the Tory electoral defeat in 1929, Churchill lost his seat and spent much of the next 11 years out of office, mainly writing and making speeches
Churchill was a nightmare for india. Partition has proved a nightmare for Muslims and Churchill stoking tensions in the 1940s very deliberately between Muslims and Hindus is to blame for a lot of the evil that happened in partition.
@@HangTheTraitors157 A damn shame the English didn't stick to England, the World would be a lot better off now had they. Assuming you are English, how good was the ODI World Cup eh??? Who won, how did England fare???? (Not the Moral World Cup)
hey nijad. rather than blame the brits ask why didn't the arabs in the mandate start planning for statehood? after twenty years was any arab group ready to form a government? quote "In December 1920, Palestinian Arabs at a congress in Haifa established an executive committee (known as the Arab Executive) to act as the representative of the Arabs. It was never formally recognized by the British and was dissolved in 1934. However, the platform of the Haifa congress, which set out the position that Palestine was an autonomous Arab entity and totally rejected any rights of the Jews to Palestine, remained the basic policy of the Palestinian Arabs until 1948." seems like arabs wasted decades trying to keep jews out of the region rather than build a functioning government.
Churchill was heavily interested in the maintaince of Britan's Naval and world trade "empire". I note there was no mention in your post about the worlds 4 Naval checkpoints. Prior to the opening of the Suez and Panama Canals there were two. The straits of Singapore and Gibraltar. Churchill probably didn't want to call attention to Britan's interest in "controlling" lands on both sides of the Suez canal openings. He probably hoped the effect of Britan "helping" the Jews would "secure ' east side of the Suez opening to the Med..
Tbh people will make up their own minds and remember him the way they chose he was a man of his day,.like so many before and after him from all nations and faiths.let he who has no sin cast the first stone.or better still don't throw stones in glass houses..
I watched that interview with Piers Morgan and he acknowledged that Churchill was flawed, did some bad things. By no means did he portray Churchill as whiter than white as you are suggesting. He spoke to thex3nd world war leadership he provided and acknowledged that. And winning that War was indeed an heroic thing for the people of this country.
As a figurehead he excelled. Unfortunately he fancied himself as a military strategist. Tens of thousands of British servicemen were sacrificed on the altar of his hubris.
@@leslie-annmills-gomez8763 If Britain and the Allies had lost WW2 to Germany,when the Nazis had finished exterminating the Jews they would have exterminated the entire black race too,so there`s that🤣😂🤣😁
Churchill is supposed to have said or written : "Individual Muslims may show splendid qualities, but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith." Any comments?
It is my responsibility to aware every one Quran is the last book of God which revealed on prophet Muhammad saw quran is the only source of guidance in whole world quran will show you the right path quran also verify bible and torah and other scripture kindly once time you study whole quran and aware yourself from the aim of life and got success in long run ❤❤❤
@@RussianFans-vn6cj Not true . . . it is a fraud just like Moo . . . Jesus said "I am the way the truth & the light" . . . he was God. Moo was merely a prophet . . . for an old tired Arab god, who was one of many.
@@RussianFans-vn6cj Never understood why every religion of lokal origins is pushing their agenda for the rest of the world as the only one and only right one and everyone has to obey them....?
Just read again the quote at 19:22. The country needs capital and POPULATION and Jews could provide both” - confirm that the areas that Jews purchased was not populated .
Wow very very interesting Paul, tx for the History lesson! Precious that we know this! What is so amazing is the many myths that managed to survive so many years! Time for all to recealed! Tx so much for ur enormous contribution so much much appreciated! On random opening of the Quran i came across a Surah LIX titled Hashr or the Gathering or babishment! Should make for some interesting reading! Tx Paul and God Bless!
I haven't read the book , but thank you for the presentation . I'm sure that you do , in some detail examine the root connection between the Jewish people and the lands of Judea and Galilee at least , and explain that the nation of Israel is possibly the oldest in the world , it's people's suffering almost complete obliteration after the Ben Kokhba revolt begun against Roman occupation in 132 Ad . The resultant depopulation didn't lead to a cultural or religious loss of identification with the ' chosen land ' . This perhaps is a point often missed by commentators regarding the current suffering of so many people , Palestinian, and Israeli today and recently .
If one goes by 2000 year old records - some touching on Fiction, other religious sects have them too, then it 'pulls the rug from under the feet of the colonials in North America, South America, Australia, NZ. Those lands belong to the NATIVES of those lands and NOT to Colonial Whites ! ?????????
Your understanding of this history is super messed up. Israel is only 75 years old. It is one of the newest nations. It was settled by Europeans. The people who had been living on that land were displaced. Prior to and during the European settlers turning up, starting from the about the turn of the 20th century, the land was controlled by Ottoman and then Britain. There isn't much else to it. Whether the European settlers used to live there or not (thousands of years ago) would be impossible to substantiate. The people who had already been living there may have been, for a very long time, but that's also effectively impossible to prove. Records don't go back that far, and there is no way to know if they were fabricated.
@@ledpupThere are, for example names Judea and Samaria, the Bible, the archeological artefacts and many-many other things. But for people of not Judeo-Christian culture there is "no proof"...
@@Mk-xe2qc I don't think you understand the argument. If we accept that everything in the Bible is true, and all the other evidence you mention is too, how can any particular European settler link their heritage to it without whatever evidence they present (some sort of document that has their family tree going back 2000 years perhaps?) not potentially being fabricated?
I can't take one Punjabi writer's opinion as historical fact. The ME has a longer and more complex history, starting long before the British Empire meddled in it.
In the interests of fairness we should also recall Winston Churchill's secret fact finding mission to Cyprus in 1907, which upon his return to Britain wrote a secret memo to parliament ('Condition of Cyprus.' Memorandum by Winston Churchill) lambasting the colonial office for the maltreatment of the Cypriots and urging parliament to intervene. His motivation appears to be more about Britain's prestige than the plight of the Cypriots but it's well to know that it was so damning that the memo remained secret for 100 years. It can be found online at the National Archives (UK) if one wants to fact-check what I said.
rather ironic that open borders in Europe has led to unfetter Muslim settling of swathes of countries. Where again the wishes of the existing inhabitants has been ignored and dismissed.
ya great numpty, he just gave you the sorce of his comment which contains the proof. It is nonsecical to then ask him to prove it. To make any sence you need to read it and fact check it in order to counter his claim. What you have done is to ask for proof of the proof when that is as good as it ever gets in the way of proof even in court. Historical documents, first hand accounts, eyewithness reports. History as you know it is build on such that may not even be that good. @@sigmanfloyd7179
At the moment that the first German soldier crossed the border into Poland, Germany was waging a war of aggression (a war crime) and was therefire outside the protection of the Geneva Conventions. This act and many more that followed released the Allies, including Great Britain, from any obligations imposed by Geneva. Or didn't you know that?
Our beloved Prophet peace be upon him said Soon nations were call each other on you like people are called to food... You reminded me of this hadith This is exactly what happened after the the khlifa Broke Because of our own sins Allah forgive us
Churchill the 1st Sea Lord and Kitchener chief of the army during WW1, almost as a team were well on their way to being joint Dicktators of the UK. Churchill was the creator of the Gallipoli invasion of Turkey, almost all of Australia's solders in this campaign including my father hated Churchill all his life.
Thanks for the selective history. I notice how quick jihadi apologists are to point out the case of Spain, as if that's supposed to be representative of the larger Arab-Muslim world. In all likelihood Spain was distinct in being the only part of Western Europe conquered into dar al Islam. The Ummayad Caliphate would have had a vested interest in presenting a more tolerant policy there that was different from other areas and probably uncharacteristic when it came to their treatment of the dhimmi minorities given the fact that all Spaniards were ahl al kitab rather than kafirs. It was in their interest to be less brutal.
So ur saying the muslims were less brutal because of the Jizya? 😂 did u also know that if the muslim cant protect them they got to give the Jizya back right?
Thank you so very much Especially at this time and everyone needs it and needs the support and the true what’s going on is a deserters but we love the story of the History and thank you so very much and keep it up and you are the here’s to mantids
My mistake in the video: the author of the book is Tariq Ali not Tariq Ramadan!
Love you bro
That was an honest mistake, I believe. Thank you for the clarification brother.
Music. Imes from the auditory memory as does language.
I believe you interviewed him also not long ago.. which was another brilliant discussion on the future of Muslims in Europe.
Perhaps you could put a correction insert in the video, every time the Tariq Ramadan is mentioned.
My grandad was a para during WW2 and worked as a peacekeeper in palastine for 2 years after the war, he said there will ALWAYS be trouble there.
It is my responsibility to aware every one
Quran is the last book of God which revealed on prophet Muhammad saw quran is the only source of guidance in whole world quran will show you the right path quran also verify bible and torah and other scripture kindly once time you study whole quran and aware yourself from the aim of life and got success in long run ❤❤
Thankz to grandpa
maybe it was BECAUSE your grandad was there as an occupier and representative of war criminals and genocidal maniacs like Churchill that he felt that way. My dad was there for two years during WWII and was forever sympathetic to the Palestinians. Maybe it was because my dad was from Cyprus, occupied by the murdering British Empire.
They got on more or less OK for a very long time until then. What changed that?
I don't mean this in a disrespectful way to your grandpa but your grandpa and what he repeated there in Palestine was the core issue and problem, why was a Brit born in the rolling meadows of the English country side in someone else's land upholding a policy by people who enjoyed blood pudding, 2000 miles away , creating and upholding a policy against an indigenous people , in their land , who who absolutely wanted nothing to do with blood pudding , being oppressed by people who had no business being there, do you understand how fundamentally immoral that is?
Arab Christians, Muslims and Jews lived in peace until the end of ww1 as I remember reading various examples of their collaborations for freedom before and during Ww1
Not true. Many criminal acts perpetrated by both
no noona. under turkish rule muslims would fight with the jewish minority and the turks would not intervene.
@@georgeh8937 Jewish were happy and respectful in the arabic lands, there were no problem at all untill the Zionism project appear under lies and false alligation. then the Zionism made conflict in other arabic countries (such as in Egypt zionism bombed a Jewish cinema and pretend that the arab did it in purpose to obligate the jewish to leave Egypt) to obligate jewish to leave their countries and come to Palestine. as many jewish like other christians and muslems considered that they are living in their countries and did not want to move to Palestine. Even in Palestine there are many strories how the jewish lived side by side with the Muslims and christians like brothers before the Slavians ( Russia, Ukrania and other east and west european jewish) come to Palestine and steal the land and ID as Semitic. take a look in the RUclips what the real jewish says ( jewish anti zionism, Naturikarta, JVP. etc.
That's false. Might wanna do more research.
2:59 Britain did not do this first. The Germans bombed Warsaw and Rotterdam as they invaded Poland and the Netherlands. It was only a matter of time before they bombed Britain. The Germans started the war and started the aerial bombing. To lay that at the door of Winston Churchill is absurd and dishonest.
When you mentioned that Churchill authorized the bombing of a German city before the Nazis bombed british civilians, you did not mention that, before this bombing, Hitler directed the Luftwaffe to bomb a dutch city, after the Netherlands announced their surrender, because it was perceived to be too slow for the Nazis. Since this action was a violation of Germany's announcement, along with Britain and France, not to bomb civilians, Churchill changed Britain's war strategy. Why didn't you mention this important fact?
Well, the fact is that Germany bombed Rotterdam on May, threatening with leveling Utrecht next; that's when the Netherlands surrendered. The bombings of civilian targets both in Germany and England only started in August. Now, I found conflicting recounts about who bombed who first, so I wouldn't stick my neck out over that one.
He also totally ignored the facts that at the end of the battle of Britain the nazis switched from targeting RAF bases and focused on London and other civilian centres. It was that action that allowed the RAF enough respite to recover slightly and win the day.
Indeed @@ricardosmythe2548
Wikipedia: "Strategic bombing during World War II began on 1 September 1939 when Germany invaded Poland and the Luftwaffe (German Air Force) began bombing Polish cities and the civilian population in an aerial bombardment campaign."
We used to call this sedition
One interesting fact for you Paul: Marmaduke Pickthall, the famous British writer, translator and Muslim convert who was born in 1875 was a "classmate and friend" of Winston Churchill at Harrow School, the prestigious boarding school in England. They both shared a similar "social" status as members of the "upper class", however, they had very different views on politics, religion and culture. Pickthall, being a devout Muslim, was a sympathizer of the Ottoman Empire and also the Indian independence movement (Did Tariq Ali mention this?), while Churchill was a staunch imperialist and colonialist.
Churchill was the butcher of Bengal, watch the video of Dr Shashi Tharoor regarding Britain's crime
Churchill often had to choose between the lesser of two evils. Of the two men, it is Churchill who will be remembered.
@@QamruddinKhan-hf4dn so whatever Shashi Tharoor says is right? Famine happened in 1942 and Churchill was fighting world war II against a monster.
@@aftabnaveed lol your name is aftab.. he even gave remarks against Islam and you are supporting him? He was a monster who was fighting against another monster... The another Austrian monster was lesser evil than Churchill because Austrian painter knew about je ews traitors who backed western allies at that time... 3-4 million Bengalis died out of starvation because he diverted essential supplies from the civilians in Bengal to sturdies Europeans... When People writing to him that people are dying he replied why hasn't Gandhi died yet? He compared Indians with animals and he also said that there was nothing wrong in colonization of America Australia he said that a greater race took over another... Is this your favourite?
@@paulamarsh1 for me Churchill was worst than hit ler...
Our uncle served in Palestine after WW2. He said they were not terrified of the arabs but of the terrorists on the other side. The murder of British squaddies and then the booby trapping of their bodies to inflict maximum mayhem and murder had something to do with this but also generally having potshots taken at them constantly. They came out of WW2 having fought Nazism and were exhausted. Why on earth are those squaddies and the ones killed at the King David hotel not commemorated each year on Remembrance Sunday? Britain is losing its sense of self these days.
I am a Palestinian 🇵🇸. I lost my uncle in the king David hotel in 1946. Rip. The Zionist terror started way before 1948
@@khaledkhatib5116 "I am a Palestinian". In what sense exactly? "The Zionist terror started way before 1948" I know. The terror of buying swamp lands Arabs didn't want at inflated prices, only to then be invaded, raped and murdered by Arab marauders. But let's not call them Arabs. Let's call them "Palestinians". Why not take credit for those murders, as Hamas gleefully did so recently?
Considering Britain's betrayal of the Jews in British created Palestine, who had just seen millions of their own people exterminated in Europe, I'd be a little afraid of the Jews too. There is just so much Jew hate the Jews are going to put up with from antisemitic ingrates. As for the title of this little video screed, no one really used the expression, "the Palestinians and the Jews" during the Mandate, because "Palestinian" was a "national" category invented by Britain, and not really accepted by the Arabs of that time, but embraced by the Jews of the mandate. And of course before the British creation of Palestine, no people ever called itself the "Palestinians". BTW, with all due respect to your dead uncle, the Arabs had committed plenty of violence against the Jews, not just during the mandate but long before, even there in the land of the Jews, i.e., the Land of Israel, as its true indigenous people called it long before the European empire known as Rome imposed the name of another people of European derivation, the Philistines, on the land of the Jews. And as for the use of "Palestinians" to describe the Arabs of Palestine in this video? That's an alleged people was actually invented in the 1960s by the Soviets and the Egyptian, Yasser Arafat.
" Britain bombed Germany first and the Germans retaliated by bombing London? " That's 'rich' , very rich.
Well he is right, Churchill did lead a small bombing raid while Operation Sea Lion was in its flow. While it did not do anything severe, hitler went crazy
Say what you like, from the comfort of your armchair. When you are surrounded by murderous neighbours, all the nuances of your history disappear rapidly up your rear end.
Churchill was a Barbarian in his soul and action. Needs condemnation from all of us who are human.
He wanted to start a war against USSR in 1945... That was his "thanks" for USSR winning the WW2 and freedomfor EU....
You need condemnation!
condemned🐱👍🏿
@@monaliza3334
USSR did not
>""winning the WW2 and freedomforEU"<
*USSR enslaved all of Eastern Europe*
*and half of Central Europe*
So were the Mongols
If you read your history. Churchill did not want to be too tough on the Germans after WW1. He already had a deep understanding of history, in fact more than most. He was a colossus of his age and is one today.
Apologetics & revisionism (and in essence, a kind of neo-imperialism) for those convinced the Muslim-Arab mind will never open, will never start thinking hard about why the Muslim-Arab world is so messed up.
Next week's discussion: how the 7th century Arabs came out of the Arabian peninsula and how they conquered and colonized the Levant, all of North Africa, and southern Spain.
And murdered those who refused to convert to Islam.
And east to India.
Excellent video except for one small but crucial missing descriptor. The Jews referred to in this entire exposé are white, European, or Ashkenazi Jews. And one of those qualifiers is a required prefix in every case. The “Arab Jews” who were already living peacefully in the Middle East were not considered or consulted in this colonial scheme. The entire affair was a 100% European project. And although native Jews were brought in later to bulk up the Jewish population, they were (and to some extent still are) treated poorly, disrespected, and discriminated against. Today the European Jews are still the mainstay of established power in Israel.
...and, the Ashkenazi usurpers have not a trace of Semite in them.
Absolutely. The long standing peaceful relationship of Jews who lived not only in Palestine but in Iraq and other parts of the Middle East was destroyed. Jews were forced to move to Israel from other Middle Eastern countries and became poor second class citizens, forced to leave their homes and business and become refugees. Britain is responsible for much of the misery not only in the Middle East but also in India and Pakistan where you can also see the idea of chopping up land according to arbitrary so called religious preferences and thus have created the modern world of unrest and terror where once was peace we now have generations of misery.
India still has synagogues in almost all major cities, with some jewish population
All are criminals. The Arabs Jews helped Israel.
@@KJVreaderFromINDIA Like in Cochin. I think the oldest in Asia. Been there. Incredible India! I LOVE your country!!!! Want to go there again.
Thank you for this!
I only just got to you mentioning how Churchil allowed the bombing of civilian areas in Germany. Haven't the Germans done the same? By the way, it was only considered a war crime since the Geneva convention in 1949. That's 4 years after WWII has finished. And what's Ali's opinion of Hamas and Hizballa shooting missiles into civilian Israeli areas on purpose? Is that ok?
Only when you have different standards towards Israel and the Jews of course.
Imagine raving alongside the biggest concentration camp on Earth, and then imagine still claiming victimhood after you had massacred almost 40 times, and wounded almost double that, more of the people you have been holding in apartheid prison for decades prior? Many Jews are also standing up to what Israel is doing, perfectly aware of the fact that Holocaust (committed by Europeans, by the way) is being used to justify the ongoing Gaza Genocide.
I wonder if the esteemed historian who wrote this book about Churchill will write the equivalent book about other leaders of the past. Maybe some historical figure from the Middle East? Not sure why that area came to mind. There must be historically important leaders from there, although none come to mind immediately. Doubtlessly none from there ever did anything ruthless or killed anyone. Very peaceful area after all.
It is my responsibility to aware every one
Quran is the last book of God which revealed on prophet Muhammad saw quran is the only source of guidance in whole world quran will show you the right path quran also verify bible and torah and other scripture kindly once time you study whole quran and aware yourself from the aim of life and got success in long run ❤❤❤❤
@RussianFans-vn6cj Galatians 5
10 I trust as to you in our Master that you will NOT consider OTHER BELIEFS, but that the one troubling you shall bear the judgment, whoever he may be. xref-2
Galatians 4
9 But now, knowing Elohim, but rather being known by Elohim, how do you turn again to the weak and poor principles to which you desire again to come under their bondage (note) xref-1
These were people who were before patterning pagan cultic practices and now came to faith in YHWH and are now known by YHWH and were turning back to the former pagan practices.
Galatians 1
6 I am surprised at how soon you have turned to another good news, away from Messiah who has called you to grace.
Maybe because Churchill is put in a pedestal and Britons are still living in a delusion that they are somehow civilised when in fact then murdered, pillaged and looted more than most other nationalities.
Your comment just proves your lack of education
Yes, that area was peaceful until Europeans...anything "wyte" people touch gets destroyed. They are the literal authors of confusion
Tariq Ali Ramadan was not only an ANTISEMITE, very clever with his discourse. Please read "Brother Tariq" by Caroline Fourest (not a Jew) He was the grandson of Hasan al-Banna, Founder of the Muslim Brtotherhood, and the apologist for Jihad.
He made a correction on his mistake - the book was written by Tariq Ali NOT Tariq Ramadan.
Anyone criticizes Zionists fascism becomes anti-Semite, as per white askhanazi colonial settlers. When Zionists see truth hurts they fling the anti-Semitic coin. The most funny but inhumanly cruel people on earth are Zionists
Thank you for your information. ☑️ clarifies things…. 🙏
Tariq classic hypocrisy
@@nickstone3113 as said by a Western European askhanazi hypocrite
Much appreciate your positive affirmation of Winston Churchill, deeds not words.
Thanks so much!
There is a very famous quote from Churchill. I think when he was in the Colonial Office, along the lines (paraphrasing): "The Jews seem to think that we can just get rid of the Arabs to suit them." At this point he was openly critical of the concept of Zionism. Very interestingly, despite being such a well-known quote, it seems to have been completely excised from history. There are people today who are actively trying to deny the facts of history, that before WWI and during the interwar period, the Palestine Mandate territory was an area heavily populated with settled Arab farmers, and that the Jewish population was a tiny minority. A demographic map of the region was drawn up in 1910 for the British government by Maunsell. This shows that the Palestine Mandate territory was the largest area of settled Arab agriculture in the Mashreq. It also shows the minute areas of settled Jewish agriculture. In 1947 at the onset of the creation of the modern state of Israel, only about a third of the population in the Palestine Mandate territory was Jewish, and most of those had only arrived since 1941. An ethno-nationalist Jewish state could only be created in a region where Jews were a minority by the ethnic cleansing of hundreds of thousands of Arabs. This was carried out at gun point by the hard men of Irgun, Hagganah and the Stern Gangs. Men brutalised by their experiences in WW2 on the eastern front. These are simply the facts of history which are forbidden in the USA and highly supressed across the west. I see many American videos on here recently, pretending that the Jews have been the majority population of the territory for all of the last 2000 years. This is either dishonest or extremely ignorant.
I think the NAZIs were guilty not only of genocide of the Jews but also of brutalizing the Jews to the Palestinian Arabs. By "Jews"., I mean Jews, worldwide. The Jews of the 1940s just did not want to know what the Arab population was at that time. The Jews just wanted to establish Israel, and did not care because I believe they felt that what had be done to them in Europe gave them license to do anything. I believe that such, too, is the attitude of Israelis today.
Interesting fact. If all stolen lands were given back, no one on the planet would have a home.
There is no such thing as a historical Palestinian state or Palestinian people. There were Arabs living in the Levant who settled there after the Arab Conquest in 739 AD. Arabs in the Levant were descendants of Arabs conquerors who colonized the Levant.
So what? It is completely irrelevant to the whole issue. If someone comes to your home pushes you off your farm at gun point, hands your land over to foreign immigrants who have only just arrived in the country, then bulldozes your village rebuilds a new one with another name. Stages massacres and terror to drive you and your people out of your homes, then claims none of this happened, If you are angry of fight back you are told you have no right to be angry and that you are only fighting back because you are 'racist', is that something you would accept yourself? If it happened to you? Say in the partition? The reason for a Palestinian state has nothing to do with some abstract historical argument about nationality. The "Two States" solution is a way to bring peace, to find a formula to end the blood feud which will otherwise go on generation after generation. The Israelis were INVADERS. They invaded the country and started this war. It is a simple fact that no one group of people want to live under another group of people. The Israelis do NOT wish to live under an Arab government, that is why they conducted mass ethnic cleansing. The Arabs do not want to live under the Israelis, which is the reality of what is happening now. Only the "Two State" solution brings any hope for peace, but you reject it, why? It is the extremists of Hamas and the Israeli hard right-wing who reject the "Two State" solution, and who want to escalate the war to a final solution of exterminating totally the other. You are supporting this. You have no reason for your point of view except your own irrational hate of Muslims. If you are not an Israeli or a Palestinian (person born in the Palestine mandate territory , or a child of a refugee from there), then why do you choose sides. Foreigners who choose sides in other people's conflicts are usually doing it for their own selfish reasons. @@siddude
@@siddudeNot according to DNA studies of archaeological sites. Even if what you state is true (and it isn’t) what does it matter in 1917 or 1948 or 2023 what was going on in 739? What a foolish comment.
Next time you want to discuss Winston Churchill, you might want to include Winston Churchill in the discussion.
Catholics were not very popular in England, sort of like Hindus in Saudi Arabia?
Arabs are white or brown depending on what ever propaganda purpose you wish to serve at the moment.
Sounds familiar to the Australian story. Where the English mentioned that there is nobody living on Australian soil
You forgot about christian Poland, which invited Jews as early as in XII century, and made them welcome for over 700 years, and able to create their own cities (Kazimierz), which means there is more to blame than christianity
Brilliant i have read the book its fascinating insight of imperialism . He was a ardent racist and imperialist.He hated the working classes and was ready to get the military to kill when they striked in London on the railways! To think of him as anything other than a a racist imperial is astonishing!He was also of the most unpopular pm in England but later became a hero just at the end of war! Everybody should know about how callous he was! Bury my heart at wounded heart is also good to read it has many parallel with what is happening in 🇵🇸🇵🇸🇵🇸
really Muslims were always in Europe ! Shame you don’t know historical facts!
So if you have any other racist type answers come back with something more tangible fool!
@@atlasto9052You can worship your false gods. But Muslims were already in northern Europe since the Viking period.
exactly they were already trading with the arabs! Man its funny how these so called keyboard warriors no very little but first to hate!!!
you wouldn't be in Europe either without the Muslims who fought your WW2. you have a lot to be thankful to the Muslims for @@atlasto9052
Following the game plan laid out at the British 1st Imperial Press Conference of 1909, and representing Rothschild interests, J.P Morgan proxies purchased the top 25 most influential publications in the United States in 1915. They then used their editorial control to drive U.S. public opinion into the First World War on the side of the Allied Powers. As a reward, the British cabinet approved the Balfour Declaration promising Baron Rothschild it would endeavor to create a homeland for Jews in Palestine.
Now, jump forward to the 1950’s, when the CIA used Operation Mockingbird to penetrate U.S. media, as well as various USG, state, and even certain metropolitan agencies.
Today, nearly all U.S. legacy media is controlled by just five conglomerates, all of which are ultimately controlled by the Deep State, which came to power behind the scenes via JFK's assassination in 1963. That is why the JFK assassination is regarded as the Third Rail in American Journalism. The Democratic Party has become its political wing, and the MSM is now little more than its propaganda arm.
an excellent explanation of events
its wrong to assume that Churchills views were those of the English workingman, they werent, he was appointed during the war because extraordinary times require extraordinary measures, but when he was elected PM in 1950 and it came down to policies the British public couldn't get rid of him quick enough, i read his biography (or one of them) and he seemed an incredibly self aggrandizing character, I was expecting every chapter to end with, "naturally, I had the last laugh and they were sorry"
These are the views of the British government and laws. This is part of your history all over the world. You believe that you are better than everyone else in the world. Look where your country has been they is miserable conditions xenophobic bigotry racist white supremacy nationalism agenda. America 🇺🇸 Africa, Latin America, Asia and Australia 🇦🇺. Your greed for power enrichment of your country in the name of your racism in the name of god save the king.
You are correct. My late father (1920 - 2016) disliked Churchill for his politics and his class. However, my father begrudgingly accepted that Churchill was the man for the moment in WW2. Its always worth noting that early to mid 20th century Britain was, across all society, racist but not in a violent way more of white Britains are superior sort of way. It was normal. Now things are different.
Being a drunk was of no help to Winnie.
Regarding Churchill’s thoughts on former colonies needing guidance, I think it’s worth noting all former colonies, in Mideast and Africa, upon independence and many under Islamist rule have fallen to chaos and ruin
British/US colonialism's legacy to the "3rd" world, the term itself being obviously racist btw... with Palestine being the masterpiece, a humanitarian crisis conceptualised and materialised largely by the British, gj. You could say everything you touch turns to shit, like Mida's touch in reverse!
Ireland and Malta are very much exceptions then......both nations now thriving after independence...I should know.....i have been to both countries
So I guess the superior attitudes of imperialists/colonizers is well founded & correct ? They were/are more superior ? 😑
Racism is not a lifestyle choice, or, is it?..I think I spot it, well enough in others, but bad neighbours are a fact of life...(My neighbours don't think a great deal of me, I'm sure?), but I think I'm a great bloke, (within reason), but, don't we all?..
sure - if you left them uneducated. Yet Hong Kong and Singapore thrive because the Chinese people made sure they educated themselves.
6:05 Why was the Ottomon Empire good but the Britiah Empire bad? Did the Ottomons ever consider giving a state/self rule? I didnt think so.
The Ottomans respected private property and did not seek to displace them with a Turkish population…
Bruh the british were like a snake devilsh
@Marya2476 the jews came in and bought property legallly in the 1880's... in the 1900's BEFORE The British arrived there were already problems. So there is that.
@@Marya2476 oh marya. must you invent excuses for islam? the reality was the palestine region was not important to the turkish rulers. it was pretty desolate. palestine had 200,000 people. the empire had 20,000,000 people. so a hundred times more.
Ottomans ruled not on basis of other nations but religious confessions. And Yes they were all independent from sultan and islam. Just taxed additionally if no muslim
....and there you have it, NONE OPPOSED. Those who could would not, those who would, could not.
The same holds true (mostly) today.
Thanks to Churchill we won the war against the nazis. Germans could have surrender early, but they didn't, and the bombing seems to have been necessary. Similarly, after Hamas horrific attack on jews, it was predictable that Israeli will attempt to demolish the military headquarters of Hamas, and warn them in advance so that the civilians could flee, but Hamas made this impossible, and is entirely responsible of the death of the Palestinians, which they simply called "martyr", like in their chart they consider women as martyrs factory. We, europeans and Americans, have to stand up for all democracies when attacked by autocracies, even more so when they have inherited nazism. The chart of Hamas is even worse than "Mein Kampf", if that is possible, as they want to destroy all Christians, and to obliterate the women's right. This video contains many truth, but seems to abstract them from the context, and lack much comparisons with the enemy of the time, and today's.
Who's we?
@@karlgreene2177 We the people belonging to secular democracies.
bombing civilians was still a war crime and Germany was held responsibe at Nuremberg 1946 but the Allies were not held responsible because they won WWII.
@@Utubexpert-kx7ew The Allies were not held mainly because in that particular case, it was the only way to win the war. They would have surrendered, there would have been no need to bombing the German cities. The goal was to win the war, not some retaliation of hate toward German civilians, which have been helped a lot after the war.
After most Arab nations expelled their Jewish populations in the late 40's, the influx into Israel of these Mizrahi Jews outnumbered the "white Ashkenazim". These Jewish refugees from Arab lands also outnumbered the Palestinian refugees, a fact not commonly known.
Prove that
@@leslie-annmills-gomez8763 There's this thing called "google".
The idea was to populate Israel with as many and with any kind of Jew as possible in order to strengthen it. From India, at first only white Jews were accepted, then after a lot of debate the Bene-Israel Jews were accepted. They were of mixed Indian race and came to India long before the so called white jews from Persia.
Indian Jews left in their droves for a better’ life after being fed heavy Israeli propaganda. They were also deeply in love with the idea of having a nation of their own.
Tariq is right. Anglo Indian Christians generally abused jews, a throwback to colonial times.
Sure it’s commonly known , if you ask a Jew in Israel whatever they’re from most are from Iraq, Syria, Lebanon etc.they’re not all Europeans .. the question is why were the expelled from their homelands to be put like rats in Israel
Why is calling The Jews, “ The Jews” anti semetic, and as it was said by an Apostle?? You lost your argument right there. You may be a bit delusional.
The truth is he was born in the Victorian era and at the height of the of the British Empire. As much as people condemn him and shout "war crimes" at him, his views were explainable given his upbringing and background. This is not to say these were not terrible, because they were, but that history grows from the past and he was a product of his past - like we all are. There was good and bad in him, as it is with all of us.
British built the railroads of India, which are still used, dilapidated as they are.
@@user-qj8pc4dv7g they built them to move their loot and their soldiers, don't make it sound like a gift to indian people
They also built schools and roads, in fact they built an entire infrastructure and brought them the modern world.@@raycroal
@@user-qj8pc4dv7g Do you really believe india didn't have schools??? no they built english schools .strange how they are doing better without us then, did japan bring britain into the moden world in the late 20th century??? i bet you have never claimed that.
@@user-qj8pc4dv7g if britain was still looting india, do you think the indians would now be owning some of the uk s most prostigious car marques?? oh! that's right in your view we would have given them our car marques because we are so effin good to them.
Churchill infamously referred to Mahatma Gandhi as "half naked fakir".
This esteemed author should see how the African people messed up South Africa: Self-enrichment of the leaders, inefficiency, corruption and crime.
“The strong do what they can; the weak suffer what they must”. ~ Thucydides
The weak are not meant to suffer, you make it sound like suffering is their destiny, even the Bible doesn't agree with you
Thank you so much 😊
Well done, Sir.
Tariq Ali -British writer?😂😂😂
Mr. Tarique Ali is using 21st century standards to judge a 19th century man. Yes, Churchill was an imperialist. In Churchills’ time, most European leaders were imperialists.
He's also pointing out things that are true that most people don't know. Also, many people in Churchill's own time disliked his attitudes and actions. What about the objections to the East India Company and ti slavery in the 18th and 19th centuries? What standards were they using?
Not really, when history is controlled by the ruling class, not much history gets out.
Consequentially, when that true history becomes known, it's not judging by a standard that did not exist before .
It's simply allowing the truth to be known, and speak for itself.
You can't judge what was unreported or unknown.
That's sort of like judging Leopold who slaughter millions by 21st century standards.
It's not, the same moral standard existed when he did it. Those of the latter centuries just didn't know it. When they found out, they simply let it be known.
That's what happened in the USAMERICA when folks started using the net to research some of those confederate statues. They found out the inscriptions beneath the statues were entire false.
BTW, I'm not in favor of removing these monuments, as long as you prints some of the real truths beneath them.
The capital city of Ethiopia, Addis Ababa, the best and longest road, the main street named after Winston Churchill!🏆
That speaks louder than what you trying to portray about Churchill.
I think he was someone who were blessed 🙌 come on he had bitten Nazi and Musoluni 😮🏆👏
you should judge any person by the laws of time when that person lived. It is not proven yet that the norms of our time are irreproachable.
Ordered times & crimes from Amazon & just opened it today
Thanks for the recommendation/work
Your reading is very lucid. Thank you.
His comments wouldn't have raised an eyebrow during his time. Right or wrong, attitudes and standards were different in his era.
Yes you could speak your mind in those days!
But his comments did draw objections in his own time. By no means did everyone agree.
This was the best I heard för a long time. Thank you Sir
Churchill like most humans was not 100% but his 75,% outshines most other leaders at their highest
How much self-hatred could a privileged Westerner have. It’s always amazing to me. Britain (under Churchill) stood alone against Hitler and kept Western Europe free.
All backed by the Vatican
Really important video in context to Mohammed Hijab's recent debate.
Yo my namesake
Yh he should research more into him. He didn't know the figures well enough in the debate with Schmoly
@@anneeq008 At least he did not make it up like Unholy Scmuly.
it shows when people do not know real history. Muslim people have always been in Europe!
I’m not a big fan of church hill because of things done in India
It’s sad that there’s so many groups of people who are too cowardly to realize that there’s a legacy of protecting the holy land, the knights Templar rejected people in their journey to the holy land, and the holy land itself knowingly that it would be taken over by the caliphate if they let their guard down and it was also honorable to protect all the different ethnicities, traveling throughout and indigenous to the area even Thomas Jefferson, who is also being maligned these days by much special interest as they are trying to vilify Churchill what are these guys supposed to do just except the Muslim takeover in their day of things that many people rightfully hold sacred so we’re just supposed to let the caliphate take over or be a threat to the whole world like the Barbary pirates and enslaved people in their Arab KKK supremacy nonsense religion that’s a false religion than actually rewrite the Bible and disregard the gospel
The 160,000 Arabs remained in what became Israel are now almost 2 million Arab Israeli citizens with full rights . No racism.
American native populations of many tribes like Kenia 30:22 now outnumber the figure from 200yrs ago. Can we conclude no ethnic clensing took place.. Hahaha
it is very emotional for me as an Arab with a Palestinian mother to hear the atrocities said and done by such men but my belief is that every passing day truths are reviled and the tide will turn in our favor InshaaAllah, but the difference is as Muslims we would never commit such evils and we will stick to our Islamic code of honor. Thank you very much Paul for this great upload may Allah bless you.
Yeah muslims never commit evils xD Go look at what Muslims did in India or how many slaves they had and how they treated them. But what to expect from someone thinking the perfect man fucks 9yo
We Muslim do commit crimes these days and don't adhere to Islamic values. Let's look at ourselves and correct it. Arabs have lots of problems not to mention the corrupt leadership
😂
@@marna7325he was a total fascist
All religions commit such evils. That is evidenced by tens of thousands of accounts and written documentations be them perpetrated by Jews, Christians, or Muslims
Conveniently, you have obviously overlooked the many Zeppelin bombing raids of British cities during the First World War
Dr. Paul, I am an Arab Muslim. I have a request, which is that I would like to support the content that your channel publishes with a correct Arabic translation. If you have people who are fluent in Arabic and English so that we can understand the content, there are Arabs who follow your blessed channel... May God protect you and reward you with goodness and grant you a good life in this world and in Paradise. Satisfaction in the afterlife.
Tariq Ali is a Pakistani-British political activist and a member of the editorial committee of the New Left Review. Winston Churchill was a British patriot that saved the free world from Nazi tyranny. Paul Williams, the presenter of this video has also presented videos "My journey to Islam", and "Becoming Muslim".
Merci, ça m’éclaire!
The title of the book is bold and blunt saying (his crimes). that's seriously shocking. It's a public accusation.
Brilliant as always! Vye vye vye Churchill! Thank you Paul for bringing our attention to such crucial information.
It is my responsibility to aware every one
Quran is the last book of God which revealed on prophet Muhammad saw quran is the only source of guidance in whole world quran will show you the right path quran also verify bible and torah and other scripture kindly once time you study whole quran and aware yourself from the aim of life and got success in long run ❤❤❤
Thank you for facts.
Time has taught me that you never know whats in the heart of people.
But their actions and achievements will be the litmus test
☝️ Ya Allah please help and protect our brothers and sisters in Palestine🇵🇸😭🤲, children, women, elderly and all innocent civilians!🤲😭❤️🇵🇸🇵🇸
What the fuck is that profile name?
And that pity comment....
You're not even trying to be clever with you deception Muslim boi...
The Christians will have fight you.
All all this shit because of the nature of your religion...
Huge chunk of Hindu land today call Islamic Pakistan an Islamic terror heaven
Byzantine citadels of Orthodox Christian today call Turkey???
Zoroastrian Iran Assyrian Christian Iraq Syria Coptic Christian Egypt Buddhist Afghanistan all under illegal Islamic occupation
57 Islamic nations and yet you Muslims crying over a sliver of land call Israel?
Shame on you Muslims
Jews Christians pagans totally extirpated from Arabia
Sorry the civilized world must unite and stand up to these Islamic bullies
Boring boring response to muslims if you dont like us just get lost useless key board warriors.Christianity. has no clout now or essence it sold itself to the devil!
Amiinn free Palestinian 🇵🇸 amiinn Allah SWT bless and protect our brother and sister amiinn free Palestinian 🇵🇸
@@MuhammadHasbullah07 Amen aimmin is from the ancient Egyptian God
Amon Ra
Moses brought it out of Egypt
Is Ra El
Is= ISIS
Ra= Amon Ra
El= ancient Phoenician God
Free Palestine from Hamas
Free Balochistan from Islamic Pakistan
It's astonishing how the British press and Media refuse to discuss the Balfour declaration that has put the Palastenians and the Jewish people on a 75 year collision course. Not a single Journalist. TV channel or newspapaer wants to discuss it.
It's actually often brought up but usually just in passing because they realize that most people won't have the patience or interest in learning about the entire history in all of its details, and prefer to stick to their preferred narratives.
Being that "Palestinians" were only concocted in 1964, relegates your proposal to nothingness.
How do you know being an American?
excellent point... how many conflicts are a direct result of arbitary lines drawn up by imperial powers to suit their own purposes... too many.
It is astonishing how you would make a statement with no basis in fact whatsoever, and declare it with zero proof.
Churchil did what needed to be done to stop Hitler. There is nothing more to say about it. War is ugly, innocent people die and suffer. This is why tha blame falls on the one who starts it.
Dear brother, could you devote a video to talk to us in some detail about the positions of Arab leaders regarding the plans related to the establishment of Isr ael?
This analysis of the treatment of the Jews in the Muslim world would have benefited greatly from even a superficial research effort which would demonstrate that antisemitism is by no means a uniquely Christian phenomenon. In different time periods the treatment of Jews has varied significantly the world over. Accordingly, there are numerous cases of antisemitism under Muslim rule, such as the 1066 Grenada massacre and in the 1656 Jewish expulsion from Isfahan (along with many other waves of expulsions and forced conversions). All of this is not to mention that - even though the majority of Jew hatred once came from a Christian populous - the countries that hold the most antisemitic views in the world today are more often than not Muslim majority countries. We could determine this by using a number of different metrics but as we've mentioned expulsions already let's start there. The most recent expulsions of Jewish populations have been from countries such as Yemen, Morocco, Egypt, Iraq, Algeria, Libya, and Lebanon. In total nearly a million Jews were expelled from or fled from Islamic countries in the 1940s and the 1950s. In many cases these communities had established traditions in these countries, going back hundreds or even thousands of years (there is archaeological evidence of Jews living in Baghdad as far back as the early sixth century BCE). This may help explain why the current Jewish population in Israel is majority Mizrachi or Sephardi ('Non-white' Jews who lived in the Middle East and North Africa). Although of course there are also sizable 'white' population in Israel, but many of them are the descendants of holocaust survivors so the theory that they are 'privileged' could also do with a swift rejection of that particular null hypothesis.
As to your take on Churchill, it is too great of an undertaking to contextualize each of the misleading statements you put forth so I will just say a couple things. First, the trouble at understanding why Churchill referred to the 'Jewish race' and not to the 'English race' as the 'best race' may be understood as an homage to the indebtedness he felt the British owed to the moral and technical contributions that Jews and Judaism had made and that we only feel uneasy with his language because he was using terms that did not yet have the negative connotation they hold for us modern viewers today. If we judge people of the past by modern standards we generally find them lacking because we are not in the same context they were in, we rarely have taken the time to learn about that context, and we (hopefully) have developed morally in the meantime, at least in certain respects. Second, I think that a lot of the examples of 'racism' that were brought up could be far better understood through the lens of paternalism rather than race hatred. He certainly believed that there were different levels of technological and civilization development, but I would suggest that scientific and developmental indices agree.
Dear friend: you seem to have a deep understanding of Jew history. Maybe you can answer this for me: Why? Why is it that Jews are so poorly treated or even driven out from everywhere? This is a honest question, I'm not anti-semite or anything of the sort. It's true that we don't have many Jews here in Spain... (we drove them out 4 hundred years ago).
Are you European
Also of Muslims are the worse then why would Israel want to be in the middle east? Make that make sense. They should be in Europe where they are loved
I am European(British), and spent much of my adult life married to an American Jewish woman. I asked her and a number of her family members the same question, as to why are Jewish people the most picked on people in History. Also why is it that even the most mild question about the behavior of the Israeli settlers in the west bank, brings about accusations of me being anti sematic. As an outsider that cares about the future of the Jewish people, I think Jewish people need to stop calling your self the chosen ones and realize you are not special and just like the rest of us. As unless you do you will spend your future at war with someone somewhere in the world.@@leslie-annmills-gomez8763
Regardless of any race "contribution" to the society, NO ONE has the right to call a race "superior" to other! That should be the fundamental morality of any HUMAN!!! Stop trying to distract from this principle!
History is rarely as simple as we are lead to believe.
Unless I misheard, England and America didn't bomb Dresden until very late 1944 / early 1945.
This was several years after Hitler ferociously bombed England in the so-called Battle of Britain.
In other words, Hitler and Germany started everything, including WWII.
Has anyone heard of the kafala system? The system in saudi arabia, kuwait, jordan, regions in the middle east...run by muslims who are recruiting poor women from africa and asia. As house workers. Its modern day slavery. Those woman and sometimes children have no rights. The people who bought them take thier passports. They are not allowed phones or to leave the house unless someones with them. These woman gets abused, bought and sold like animals. And kuwait has the best laws towards it in the region. Hopefully that changes some day.
Yes, disgusting.
This is an excellent example of revisionist history, in which a relatively few historically accurate facts are mixed in with many unsupported allegations and much innuendo and inference to create a false narrative of history supporting a particular political ideology. Well done, Sir!
Revisionism is just taking another look at history focusing on the understanding that people of the past were capable of lies and propaganda. Just because it disagrees with your current perceptions of history and your race, doesn't make it automatically wrong.
Rubbish!
🙄
🙄
😂😂😂Revisionism is stupid.
And as churchill said after the war and saw what stalin and his Bolsheviks were doing to the people of eastern europe.I think we picked the wrong side
A couple of facts of relevance:
1. Winston Churchill was the first vice-president of the racist and elitist Eugenics Education Society, founded by Charles Darwin's cousin Francis Galton and son Major Leonard Darwin.
2. The eugenics doctrines had profound influence on the treatment of dark-skinned people and indigenous people in all the British colonies.
3. Churchill, like the British Monarchs George v and VI, was a Freemason.
Not a crime to be a Freemason.
David Irvine's books have great insight into Churchils funding during the wilderness years when he was not in parliment and his paymasters (handlers) , his alcoholism
.And also his attempt to bomb germany with anthrax .A great insight and excellent read . especialy the abdication of the king and refusal to let anyone read the offer of peace from the NSDAP .
David Irving has been totally discredited as a historian. He is a known NAZI sympathizer and has had judicial judgements that found he manipulated/obscured or just plain lied to present the NSDAP in a good light.
David Irvine is wrong, Churchill was without a seat in parliament for a very short time, lost his original seat and picked up a seat in a bye election not long after
@@gregsutton6258 oh dear was he also wrong about the alcoholic part and the anthrax or the refusal to let parliment read the suit for peace ?
@@gregsutton6258 Following the Tory electoral defeat in 1929, Churchill lost his seat and spent much of the next 11 years out of office, mainly writing and making speeches
1929 to 1939 is a decade how long do you think is a very long time in a political career vacation 🤣 Did you even read Irvines book ? In fact have you EVER READ A BOOK 🤣
@@gregsutton6258 Really ? Following the Tory electoral defeat in 1929, Churchill lost his seat and spent much of the next 11 years out of office, mainly writing and making speeches
Churchill was a nightmare for india. Partition has proved a nightmare for Muslims and Churchill stoking tensions in the 1940s very deliberately between Muslims and Hindus is to blame for a lot of the evil that happened in partition.
Neruh and the Muslims wanted Partition. It would have happened in any case in some way.
@@SionTJobbins something happening is very different to a bloodbath. He predicted it because he was helping engineer it !!!!
@@SunnyandWillow So it wasn't Churchill then? Make you mind up. England for the English.
VERY TRUE, ASS HOLE DIVIDED OUR PUNJAB, TO KEEP A PIECE TO BOOST FAKE EGO OF WEST.
@@HangTheTraitors157 A damn shame the English didn't stick to England, the World would be a lot better off now had they. Assuming you are English, how good was the ODI World Cup eh??? Who won, how did England fare???? (Not the Moral World Cup)
GB played a double game promising a nation for both sides in same area and when shit hit the fans they bailed out saying it isn't their problem.
hey nijad. rather than blame the brits ask why didn't the arabs in the mandate start planning for statehood? after twenty years was any arab group ready to form a government? quote "In December 1920, Palestinian Arabs at a congress in Haifa established an executive committee (known as the Arab Executive) to act as the representative of the Arabs. It was never formally recognized by the British and was dissolved in 1934. However, the platform of the Haifa congress, which set out the position that Palestine was an autonomous Arab entity and totally rejected any rights of the Jews to Palestine, remained the basic policy of the Palestinian Arabs until 1948." seems like arabs wasted decades trying to keep jews out of the region rather than build a functioning government.
Churchill was heavily interested in the maintaince of Britan's Naval and world trade "empire". I note there was no mention in your post about the worlds 4 Naval checkpoints. Prior to the opening of the Suez and Panama Canals there were two. The straits of Singapore and Gibraltar. Churchill probably didn't want to call attention to Britan's interest in "controlling" lands on both sides of the Suez canal openings. He probably hoped the effect of Britan "helping" the Jews would "secure ' east side of the Suez opening to the Med..
I think history changes as time moves on. Nowadays many want to put our modern outlook on to older norms.
Tbh people will make up their own minds and remember him the way they chose he was a man of his day,.like so many before and after him from all nations and faiths.let he who has no sin cast the first stone.or better still don't throw stones in glass houses..
I watched that interview with Piers Morgan and he acknowledged that Churchill was flawed, did some bad things. By no means did he portray Churchill as whiter than white as you are suggesting. He spoke to thex3nd world war leadership he provided and acknowledged that. And winning that War was indeed an heroic thing for the people of this country.
Stalin defeated the Germany too, does it make him a good person? Unbelievable argument.
As a figurehead he excelled. Unfortunately he fancied himself as a military strategist. Tens of thousands of British servicemen were sacrificed on the altar of his hubris.
Well he wasn't great for black people so who exactly is he a hero to?
@@leslie-annmills-gomez8763 If Britain and the Allies had lost WW2 to Germany,when the Nazis had finished exterminating the Jews they would have exterminated the entire black race too,so there`s that🤣😂🤣😁
Churchill is supposed to have said or written :
"Individual Muslims may show splendid qualities, but the influence of the religion paralyses the social development of those who follow it. No stronger retrograde force exists in the world. Far from being moribund, Mohammedanism is a militant and proselytizing faith."
Any comments?
In 1910 Churchill tried to pass a bill allowing sterilisation of the British poor. The man was a full blown eugenisist
Paul I'd like to thank you for this channel and this lesson.
Alhamdulillah
It is my responsibility to aware every one
Quran is the last book of God which revealed on prophet Muhammad saw quran is the only source of guidance in whole world quran will show you the right path quran also verify bible and torah and other scripture kindly once time you study whole quran and aware yourself from the aim of life and got success in long run ❤❤❤
@@RussianFans-vn6cj Not true . . . it is a fraud just like Moo . . .
Jesus said "I am the way the truth & the light" . . . he was God.
Moo was merely a prophet . . . for an old tired Arab god, who was one of many.
@@BloggingTheologyremember the Luftwaffe bombed Warsaw before the RAF bombed German cities.
@@RussianFans-vn6cj
Never understood why every
religion of lokal origins is pushing
their agenda for the rest of the
world as the only one and only
right one and everyone has to
obey them....?
Thank you for your great content and interviews on your program. I've been following sometime.
Glad you like them!
Just read again the quote at 19:22. The country needs capital and POPULATION and Jews could provide both” - confirm that the areas that Jews purchased was not populated .
Wow very very interesting Paul, tx for the History lesson! Precious that we know this! What is so amazing is the many myths that managed to survive so many years! Time for all to recealed! Tx so much for ur enormous contribution so much much appreciated! On random opening of the Quran i came across a Surah LIX titled Hashr or the Gathering or babishment! Should make for some interesting reading! Tx Paul and God Bless!
I am learning so much. 🙏
Not here, my dear.
I haven't read the book , but thank you for the presentation . I'm sure that you do , in some detail examine the root connection between the Jewish people and the lands of Judea and Galilee at least , and explain that the nation of Israel is possibly the oldest in the world , it's people's suffering almost complete obliteration after the Ben Kokhba revolt begun against Roman occupation in 132 Ad . The resultant depopulation didn't lead to a cultural or religious loss of identification with the ' chosen land ' . This perhaps is a point often missed by commentators regarding the current suffering of so many people , Palestinian, and Israeli today and recently .
If one goes by 2000 year old records - some touching on Fiction, other religious sects have them too, then it 'pulls the rug from under the feet of the colonials in North America, South America, Australia, NZ. Those lands belong to the NATIVES of those lands and NOT to Colonial Whites ! ?????????
Your understanding of this history is super messed up. Israel is only 75 years old. It is one of the newest nations. It was settled by Europeans. The people who had been living on that land were displaced. Prior to and during the European settlers turning up, starting from the about the turn of the 20th century, the land was controlled by Ottoman and then Britain.
There isn't much else to it. Whether the European settlers used to live there or not (thousands of years ago) would be impossible to substantiate. The people who had already been living there may have been, for a very long time, but that's also effectively impossible to prove.
Records don't go back that far, and there is no way to know if they were fabricated.
@@ledpupThere are, for example names Judea and Samaria, the Bible, the archeological artefacts and many-many other things. But for people of not Judeo-Christian culture there is "no proof"...
@@Mk-xe2qc I don't think you understand the argument. If we accept that everything in the Bible is true, and all the other evidence you mention is too, how can any particular European settler link their heritage to it without whatever evidence they present (some sort of document that has their family tree going back 2000 years perhaps?) not potentially being fabricated?
@@ledpup your ignoring ancient history and archaeology ..unless your in deliberate denial of it , or , both sources of knowledge are false
I can't take one Punjabi writer's opinion as historical fact. The ME has a longer and more complex history, starting long before the British Empire meddled in it.
In the interests of fairness we should also recall Winston Churchill's secret fact finding mission to Cyprus in 1907, which upon his return to Britain wrote a secret memo to parliament ('Condition of Cyprus.' Memorandum by Winston Churchill) lambasting the colonial office for the maltreatment of the Cypriots and urging parliament to intervene. His motivation appears to be more about Britain's prestige than the plight of the Cypriots but it's well to know that it was so damning that the memo remained secret for 100 years. It can be found online at the National Archives (UK) if one wants to fact-check what I said.
Churchill was a child molestor
~ "...his motive appears to be..."
Can you prove that? If not, please keep your theories to yourself.
@@sigmanfloyd7179 Have you read the document? If not, please keep your ignorance to yourself.
rather ironic that open borders in Europe has led to unfetter Muslim settling of swathes of countries. Where again the wishes of the existing inhabitants has been ignored and dismissed.
ya great numpty, he just gave you the sorce of his comment which contains the proof. It is nonsecical to then ask him to prove it. To make any sence you need to read it and fact check it in order to counter his claim. What you have done is to ask for proof of the proof when that is as good as it ever gets in the way of proof even in court. Historical documents, first hand accounts, eyewithness reports. History as you know it is build on such that may not even be that good. @@sigmanfloyd7179
At the moment that the first German soldier crossed the border into Poland, Germany was waging a war of aggression (a war crime) and was therefire outside the protection of the Geneva Conventions. This act and many more that followed released the Allies, including Great Britain, from any obligations imposed by Geneva. Or didn't you know that?
This is a very one-sided talk. He quotes only what suits him but omits what does not.
Our beloved Prophet peace be upon him said
Soon nations were call each other on you like people are called to food...
You reminded me of this hadith
This is exactly what happened
after the the khlifa Broke
Because of our own sins
Allah forgive us
The point is not to find the truth, but to have the heart power to embrass it.
I'm not Muslim but I really like your comment. Peace
For all have sinned and fallen short of the glory of God.
Churchill the 1st Sea Lord and Kitchener chief of the army during WW1, almost as a team were well on their way to being joint Dicktators of the UK. Churchill was the creator of the Gallipoli invasion of Turkey, almost all of Australia's solders in this campaign including my father hated Churchill all his life.
He saved the World, this guy never would have been born if it wasn’t for WC😊
Bollocks
Thanks for the selective history. I notice how quick jihadi apologists are to point out the case of Spain, as if that's supposed to be representative of the larger Arab-Muslim world. In all likelihood Spain was distinct in being the only part of Western Europe conquered into dar al Islam. The Ummayad Caliphate would have had a vested interest in presenting a more tolerant policy there that was different from other areas and probably uncharacteristic when it came to their treatment of the dhimmi minorities given the fact that all Spaniards were ahl al kitab rather than kafirs. It was in their interest to be less brutal.
So ur saying the muslims were less brutal because of the Jizya? 😂 did u also know that if the muslim cant protect them they got to give the Jizya back right?
"Some Arabs hated Jews". So what? That doesn't change history or make Zionism better.
Thank you so very much Especially at this time and everyone needs it and needs the support and the true what’s going on is a deserters but we love the story of the History and thank you so very much and keep it up and you are the here’s to mantids
Thank you.
I honestly thought it was common knowledge that churchill wasnt a saint lol
That guy was a raging racist . Not that it was that special at that time.
My grandparents uncles and aunts all couldn't stand him and voted him out straight after the war