XFLR5 PART1 AIRFOIL ANALYSIS | HANDS ON TUTORIAL SERIES

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 14 июл 2024
  • XFLR5 Hands on Tutorial Series
    PART1 Airfoil Analysis
    XFLR5
    www.xflr5.tech/xflr5.htm
    NACA0012 Airfoil experimental data:
    turbmodels.larc.nasa.gov/naca...
    SG6040 Airfoil Coordinates
    m-selig.ae.illinois.edu/ads.html
    #xflr5 #xflr5airfoil #airfoilanalysis

Комментарии • 30

  • @adamhale6672
    @adamhale6672 2 года назад +6

    I was recommended some different tutorials to learn this software, but this was much clearer and concise that the others I was trying to watch. It also uses the updated version of XFLR5. Thank you!

    • @Simulation-Engineer
      @Simulation-Engineer  2 года назад

      You are welcome Adam, thanks for the feedback and nice comment ☺

  • @apoorvsom9120
    @apoorvsom9120 2 года назад +4

    Wow! Thank you very much for such a nice explanation. I have watched several videos but they take so much of our time explaining things not much relevant to me. This was a perfect video. Good job!!

    • @Simulation-Engineer
      @Simulation-Engineer  2 года назад +1

      You are welcome Apoorv, thanks for the nice comment and feedback ☺

  • @61Ertu
    @61Ertu 3 года назад +1

    You even did the validation, thanks man.

  • @alexandros1982
    @alexandros1982 3 года назад +2

    Really good job. Thank you for this tutorial !

  • @williambrooks8591
    @williambrooks8591 3 года назад +3

    Fantastic Tutorial - really clear and at a good pace

  • @TheAeroAceMix
    @TheAeroAceMix 3 года назад +1

    Re Validation, Xfoil is very well validated so there is no suprise there. Im looking forward to seeing how acurate the 3d stuff is. PS thanks for this

  • @Shafipakis
    @Shafipakis 4 года назад +2

    zabardust profeesor saqib
    keep it up

  • @amirbouzid3966
    @amirbouzid3966 2 года назад +1

    thank you sir . you are such a good teacher

    • @Simulation-Engineer
      @Simulation-Engineer  2 года назад +1

      You are welcome, thanks for the feedback and nice comment ☺

  • @AdelHaiba78
    @AdelHaiba78 2 года назад +1

    Thank you very much, very informative tutorial.

  • @E101STUNT
    @E101STUNT 3 года назад +2

    My friend said you deserve sloppy toppy for this

  • @blazejmaruszewski9042
    @blazejmaruszewski9042 3 года назад +1

    Quick tip, if your graphs look like a 3 year old scribble, right click and reset the scale ;-p

  • @tariqjavaid4690
    @tariqjavaid4690 Год назад

    I have a problem related to simulating FX 61128 airfoil using XFLR5. I don't get any results on analysis. The question is can I get results for any random airfoil? Or Is it like a predefined set of airfoils which are used for wing analysis?

  • @simplelife87
    @simplelife87 3 года назад +1

    hi
    I am just curious in minute 12.14 where u stated that "viscous effect is not actually calculate here". However there is a viscous function and a display of displacement thickness which through my imagination that is actually a boundary layer.

    • @Simulation-Engineer
      @Simulation-Engineer  3 года назад +2

      - With this I mean there are some limitations within xflr5 to calculate viscous effects. That is there is lack of interaction between boundary layer and inviscid flow. Also the estimation of viscous drag.
      - Potential methods such as VLM and 3d Panel methods merely interpolate 2d viscous drag from local wing lift that is not good.
      - Their is lack of interactive boundary layer loop, which is a coupling method between potential flow and viscous flow on surfaces.
      - The effect of the boundary layer is to
      modify the geometry of surfaces and to
      disturb the inviscid potential flow.
      - A loop is therefore needed to reach a
      solution that satisfies both the viscous
      model and the potential flow model.
      - This loop is not implemented in the
      panel methods available in xflr5.
      - Consequences / drawbacks are:
      * The lift is a linear function of the a.o.a.,
      unlike with XFoil or with the non-linear
      LLT.
      * Significant differences in the lift
      coefficient predictions at low Reynolds
      numbers.
      * The potential flow model is only
      valid in conditions of limited flow
      separation.
      Hope this helps, thanks.

    • @simplelife87
      @simplelife87 3 года назад +1

      @@Simulation-Engineer thank you for ur feedback

  • @astikshrivastava6946
    @astikshrivastava6946 3 года назад +2

    I cannot see any graph on operating view. Also the polars I'm getting are not what are shown

    • @Simulation-Engineer
      @Simulation-Engineer  3 года назад

      Plz check the xflr5 setup in case you missed something and normally you should get similar results, thanks

  • @sarandicarlomichael2109
    @sarandicarlomichael2109 2 года назад +2

    Hello, I have the updated xflr5 but the graph isn't coming out

  • @kesmirsavasci3123
    @kesmirsavasci3123 Год назад +1

    How can i install xlr5.