As someone who doesn’t speak English regularly, I understood the title perfectly and it baffles me how people who actively speak this language can’t understand that « should have » means he survives against all odds instead of a simple opinion the creator has. Learn to speak English before leashing out all your hate on someone with a great storytelling and a well built video.
I agree with your comment. It is also interesting, because the word >should< is obviously not used to imply that it would have been justified. It is like you say, that the term to a foreign speaker is similiar to the meaning of the word "mustn't". However even with a different definition the phrase could be read as a comment on how all the factors of the situation seemingly conspired against the driver, therefore making it a causality. In this way it is a different context, where in the importance of the person is not as high because of the purely chaotic nature of the crash. However the writer of the phrase might use it, because he sees himself as different from the driver, or better, or as purely a customer who has no interest in personal issues of the drivers or the theoretical possibilty of a human being hurt in the process of racing. The interesting thing here is, that not only this is a personality trait, it is also objectivly correct to see it this way, bevcause almost no one watching the race has a real insight into the human component of it. So even though almost no one might agree with it, it would be politicaly correct and just a madder of opinion, because the driver needs to protect himself and not act thoughtless.
In this context the use of "Should have" refers to the severity of the incident, being so severe by all odds he 'Should' have died, how ever he defied those odds be it by luck or training/ saftey engineering. so yes should have is the correct term and correctly relays the severity of the crash
The funniest part is how some of them have it explained and are like "no I know english better than you native speakers and I will ignore your explanation". That being said F1 fanbase at least in the youtube comment sections has never been known for their high intelligence sadly..
One thing I noticed, at 5:48 the track layout shown is the most recent one. It doesn't show the old turn 9-10 complex as it was removed for the 2021 Australian GP
The amount of people in the current grid that would have probably died if things were only slightly worse or if the F1 didnt make such big steps forward with the safety features is pretty crazy.
All the safety gear Fernando was wearing , that which was built into the car and that absorbing material in and on the track, helped to save Fernando's life. But the key thing here was the car was moving throughout the entire accident. Each motion expended terrible forces that could have been transmitted to Fernandos body and brain. I saw it happen, as did millions of other fans did, live on tv and was astonished he was okay. Robert Kubica's amazing crash at Canada stands out as one of the worst crashes with no real injuries in Formula One. In that case, there was a massive impact but the car never stopped, saving Robert's life. At the end of that accident, his feet were dangling out of the front of the car, incredibly...undamaged. And, of course, Romain Grosjean's car, stabbing it's way through a guardrail at over 140 miles per hour, while Romain still kept his head on his shoulders, thanks to the Halo device, ranks as one of the most horrific survived accidents in racing history. After many agonizing seconds, Romain's ghostly shadow, walking quickly through the flames, is a very welcome vision, I will never forget. All thanks to those who died before and those who determined that no more would die like they did. Thank you to all the people who saved these drivers lives and continue to do so today.
I remember Sophia Floersch as well. Of course not an F1 crash, but given she is german and currently basically the best female formula driver (driving F3 again now). If I didnt know she survived and was racing again I would have 100% said the person there died. It was in Macao 2018, basically at full speed flying into a catch fence.
It really doesnt take a genius to understand that those quotes dont exist as actual audio given he included actual audio of many other things. I think its a nice feature and shows how dedicated he is that he had an AI with read it with a voic that strongly resembled the person he was quoting instead of just reading it himself.
Oddly specific and well timed. I remember watching this live. At the time I thought two things which were, this isn’t going to be good and that camera shot was insane. Now imagine crashing and ending up on your side in the middle of a live race track.
At that period of time it wasn't often that I set an alarm clock for the Melbourne's race, but that year, I've seen that crash live. Absolutely insane and I was in shock and in fear for Alonso's life!
The more I learn about Alonso, the higher he goes on my list of favorite drivers!!! Alonso is I believe the most conscious awareness of racing, racing tactics, his ability to recover his coffin and regain control from where others thought it impossible to recover. NOT SURE THE. ORRECT TERM BUT I WILL CALL IT TRACK AWARENESS. He is playing CHESS where others playing tic tac toe. He can extract the most out of any car on any track. I believe that he should be I. The category of GOAT even though he is not I. The top 5 today. Being able to drive and perform in F1. For as long as he has without significant deterioration of reflexes. I hope Alonso, Is able to race for as long as he is competitive enough. Then he would make probably THE. BEST ENGINEER F1 has seen.( already able to change n control outcome of race by slowing g down, or towing other people.). He is able to see the big picture almost all the time. In truth the more I learn about individual drivers the more I like them. Like Norris, tsunodA, and thr. A or one HAMILTON. In the past Hamilton was my least favorite driver. I saw and still see him taking people out of race(front tire bump) and making it seem an accident or circumstance of turn.( Verstappen wallcrash at 51g.) saying he turned into him, Not even asking how he was for about a minute. Just didn’t like him at all. However since he has fallen and more I learn about him as a person the more I am cheering for him. Even being anointed a knight. He is Sir Lewis Hamilton. He has a life outside F1 that does not deal with racing?plays guitar and many other hobbies.
He wasn't trying to say that he should have died, he was saying that the crash would have killed him and any other driver who got in a crash like that in the time
People get in severe car accidents all the time and say “I should have died”. How do so many of you have such a poor grasp of the English language? It’s not a “wish death on Fernando” statement, for the love of god. It’s a “that accident was beyond bad enough to cause death, and therefore Fernando cheated death, and according to logic “should” have not survived the damage of that crash. How is this so difficult to understand?
for the love of god , you don't say "should have" to someone who have near-death accident, If the word came from Alonso himself then it's make sense. "could have" pretty much have the same meaning in this context and it is a better choice of word.
@@kazsimmonz96 yes you do 💀 when you get in severe crashes its very common for a DOCTOR to say "you shouldve died, you are very lucky" its just basic english, its fine its not your first language but just understand that you are wrong here, simply
@@kazsimmonz96 then that would be improper english and would undermine the severity of the situation. there is no "doing me" in this situation. its just proper english
I sincerely think that doctors could use peoples' reactions to this video title as a means of testing if you have autism. Absolutely nuts how people are misinterpreting it!
This was absolutely terrifying to watch I thought Fernando was dead when the car stopped moving it was an overwhelming feeling of relief to see Fernando out of the car and moving. This is one of those incidents that shows no matter safe the sport and cars are made racing will always be extremely dangerous.
I was in the stand that day right where he finished up. It all happened too quickly to comprehend. All of a sudden there was a cloud of gravel. Luckily he was quick to get out, to a large round of applause. I did get some cool shots of the damaged cars though.
The comments are filled with people who all appear to be professional content creators. Just wanted to say thanks for the video and the work that you’ve put into this.
Amazing video. Really loved it. The story telling is up to the mark. The words, the hype being created and the script are all crisp. Keep on the good work. You gained a subscriber ❤️
Mate i don't know if i m right or wrong but i think so this is the same turn where today george russel crashed in final lap behind alonso because of oversteer and dirty air affecting the grip
I remember this really well when I was watching it, just the sheer shunt of the incident made me scared and seeing him out of the car was a massive relief, the way his car got to that point violently only made it worse, when I see him race now, am happy for him since that kind of force and shunt was real scary
What a legend to come out of this and recover so quick, i wish he gets to win champion again!. Nice job by the way, its totaly better than netflix how are you not hired to do the job properly 🏎🏎❤❤❤
I really wish you would have shown a clip of the full crash, either the animated one or the real one. every time you showed the crash, it would get cut off, and it was never once fully shown.
A video made by a dramatic Gen Z I guess, one that started seeing F1 in the last 2 years. Kubica's accident in Canada was way worse. He actually looked dead for a minute and all. F1 is extremely safe nowadays.
why did you shwo footage of drivers. startin g the formation lap when talking about the race start? and show footage of a race at the red bull ring when talking about australia?
Yep, Alonso almost definitely should have died. However, his car and the way it was constructed, definitely saved his life, that and quite a bit of luck on his part. The fact that Alonso was able to get out of what was left of the car and physically walk unaided to the medical transport is a small miracle in and of itself.
Unfortunately most of the viewers are unable to grasp the obvious nuances of the English language and think the person making the video wants him dead.
Obviously never seen Martin Brundle's Melbourne Lap 1 shunt. Same track, same corner, made this one look SMALL. Car ended up in two pieces, Brundle took the restart...
Everyone saying that have “should” in the title is wrong. At that time it was a very unlikely to survive a crash like that. So at the time of the race yes he should have died but he somehow managed to survive
Using the Ferrari logo when talking about a Haas Ferrari, Ferrari is just the engine, the team was Haas, you didn't show a Honda logo for Alonso's car and call it a McLaren Honda
@@AnonymousGuy05Anyone could have died at any individual moment of there life. That would not make sense. This is pure theatrical outrage. Words and phrases can have multiple meanings, and by all accounts he categorically SHOULD have died. He is very lucky.
Looking back at things Ron Dennis sure wasn't wrong, no other team has won a constructor that didn't have a factory deal. The only team that came 2nd that didn't have a full works deal was RBR. Presently, only factory teams still finishing 2nd and with a cost cap. They still can't flush out the usual suspects.
The fact so many bits came flying off as he wrecked probably saved his life. BTW, those words were Alonso's but on this segment, the audio with the voice actor's phony Spanish accent was not.
I don't think there was any way Alonso could have passed the other car cleanly with that right turn coming up so quickly. If Alonso was able to get past the other car, I think he would have been carrying too much speed and caught his left tires in the gravel and gone into the barricade regardless. Also, I hated the look of those tiny, high rear wings on the cars from that short era.
Incredibly same kind of accident Jacques Villeneuve had with Ralf Schumacher at that same track and at the same place 15 years earlier. The difference was that Villeneuves crash was much worse. When canadian hit with his BAR-Honda in to Schumachers BMW Williams, there was higher speed and Villeneuves car lifted up to air immediately. It went totally in peaces when it ended up in to wall, minus the cockpit, and one of the track marsahlas got killed by the tire of Villeneuves car.
Yeah that title is severely out of pocket, God forbid that anything bad happens to any F1 driver, thankfully for all stupid decisions FIA made, safety improvements aren't one of them
2003 brasil was for sure worse, cuz safety wasn't really something known in that era and below it. And we all know that he couldn't even stand on one of his leg. And had to get in an ambulance on that idk how its called bed
In this context the use of "Should have" refers to the severity of the incident, being so severe by all odds he 'Should' have died, how ever he defied those odds be it by luck or training/ saftey engineering. so yes should have is the correct term and correctly relays the severity of the crash
the ai reading the driver interviews sounds terrible, please never do that again
I agree
strongly agree
I agree too
+
laziness
Putting V10 sounds over V6 footage *should* be illegal
As someone who doesn’t speak English regularly, I understood the title perfectly and it baffles me how people who actively speak this language can’t understand that « should have » means he survives against all odds instead of a simple opinion the creator has. Learn to speak English before leashing out all your hate on someone with a great storytelling and a well built video.
Agreed
Brilliant!
Real
I agree with your comment. It is also interesting, because the word >should< is obviously not used to imply that it would have been justified. It is like you say, that the term to a foreign speaker is similiar to the meaning of the word "mustn't". However even with a different definition the phrase could be read as a comment on how all the factors of the situation seemingly conspired against the driver, therefore making it a causality. In this way it is a different context, where in the importance of the person is not as high because of the purely chaotic nature of the crash. However the writer of the phrase might use it, because he sees himself as different from the driver, or better, or as purely a customer who has no interest in personal issues of the drivers or the theoretical possibilty of a human being hurt in the process of racing. The interesting thing here is, that not only this is a personality trait, it is also objectivly correct to see it this way, bevcause almost no one watching the race has a real insight into the human component of it. So even though almost no one might agree with it, it would be politicaly correct and just a madder of opinion, because the driver needs to protect himself and not act thoughtless.
As an English speaker this is exactly what I deduced from the title, you are much more fluent than most🎉
I still think Brazil 2003 was Fernando's biggest crash, that impact was just massive
My thoughts exactly especially after Antoine Hubert
He crashed during the free trial of F1 we took for granted between 1994 till 2014
was just going to say that
he was quite lucky too, he would have been dead if it werent the hans device they newly installed
He should not have almost died he could’ve
The way the title is written, it makes it sound as if they wanted him to die 😅
in some cases, "should have" refers to when something is expected to happen, but doesn't happen
In this context the use of "Should have" refers to the severity of the incident, being so severe by all odds he 'Should' have died, how ever he defied those odds be it by luck or training/ saftey engineering. so yes should have is the correct term and correctly relays the severity of the crash
Anyone of at least average intelligence knows exactly what the title meant. I’m sure you fit that criteria. Stop being a semantics soldier.
Grammarly just broke.😆
Not sure if there's actually that many trolls or if there legitimately is that many people that probably SHOULD not have made it to adulthood...
The funniest part is how some of them have it explained and are like "no I know english better than you native speakers and I will ignore your explanation".
That being said F1 fanbase at least in the youtube comment sections has never been known for their high intelligence sadly..
Wow, you're literally saying that you want them to die? 🌝
@@lukew6725 🤦♂️🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️🤦🤦🤦🤦🤦🤦🤦🤦🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏💀
@@lukew6725 🤦♂️🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️🤦🏻♂️🤦🤦🤦🤦🤦🤦🤦🤦🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏🙏💀
@@lukew6725 thats not at all what the title or what anyone said
One thing I noticed, at 5:48 the track layout shown is the most recent one. It doesn't show the old turn 9-10 complex as it was removed for the 2021 Australian GP
@RedbullfanforLife yeah my bad I meant the track was modified in 2021
Should?? dude.... really?
Due to the severity of the crash....what on earth are you insinuating?!
It's like you can't say anything nowadays
@@biffatron23what do u expect, just look at his profile pic 😂
@@biffatron23isnt it better if he said “could have” instead of should?
@@biffatron23pretty sure its a joke so... the same can be said right back at you
@@Jotz1337bro himself got an anime pfp and tells others to look at, nice 😂
The amount of people in the current grid that would have probably died if things were only slightly worse or if the F1 didnt make such big steps forward with the safety features is pretty crazy.
All the safety gear Fernando was wearing , that which was built into the car and that absorbing material in and on the track, helped to save Fernando's life. But the key thing here was the car was moving throughout the entire accident. Each motion expended terrible forces that could have been transmitted to Fernandos body and brain. I saw it happen, as did millions of other fans did, live on tv and was astonished he was okay.
Robert Kubica's amazing crash at Canada stands out as one of the worst crashes with no real injuries in Formula One. In that case, there was a massive impact but the car never stopped, saving Robert's life. At the end of that accident, his feet were dangling out of the front of the car, incredibly...undamaged.
And, of course, Romain Grosjean's car, stabbing it's way through a guardrail at over 140 miles per hour, while Romain still kept his head on his shoulders, thanks to the Halo device, ranks as one of the most horrific survived accidents in racing history.
After many agonizing seconds, Romain's ghostly shadow, walking quickly through the flames, is a very welcome vision, I will never forget.
All thanks to those who died before and those who determined that no more would die like they did.
Thank you to all the people who saved these drivers lives and continue to do so today.
I remember Sophia Floersch as well. Of course not an F1 crash, but given she is german and currently basically the best female formula driver (driving F3 again now).
If I didnt know she survived and was racing again I would have 100% said the person there died. It was in Macao 2018, basically at full speed flying into a catch fence.
Seeing Romain Grosjean come out of those flames (after an eternity & all hope) was so confusing I will never forget his Miracle!🙏🏼👑 🕊️
i hate how you took an AI to say the quotes instead of the actual audio, it sounds so stupid
It really doesnt take a genius to understand that those quotes dont exist as actual audio given he included actual audio of many other things.
I think its a nice feature and shows how dedicated he is that he had an AI with read it with a voic that strongly resembled the person he was quoting instead of just reading it himself.
@@LunnarisLP theres quite a few quotes that have been said during a press conference that have been replaced by ai voice but okay
@@AlexBarbu theres quite a few quotes that have been said during a press conference that have been replaced by ai voice but okay
@@btflskylights theres quite a few quotes that have been said during a press conference that have been replaced by ai voice but okay
@@LunnarisLP AI sucks. Just read them out. He has a voice
He crawled out of a crumpled piece of metal. Incredible
Good video but please stop using AI in your videos. RUclips will start flagging these for viewers very soon
It's also just jarring and annoying. Show the crash first (for those whom never seen it), then break it down after.
agree
Oddly specific and well timed.
I remember watching this live. At the time I thought two things which were, this isn’t going to be good and that camera shot was insane.
Now imagine crashing and ending up on your side in the middle of a live race track.
George Russel core 💀
wow i dont know when that will happen hopefully not soon 💀
At that period of time it wasn't often that I set an alarm clock for the Melbourne's race, but that year, I've seen that crash live. Absolutely insane and I was in shock and in fear for Alonso's life!
I've had 2 pneumothorax, that shot is very very painful. For him to he racing a few weeks later was crazy for me!
The more I learn about Alonso, the higher he goes on my list of favorite drivers!!!
Alonso is I believe the most conscious awareness of racing, racing tactics, his ability to recover his coffin and regain control from where others thought it impossible to recover. NOT SURE THE. ORRECT TERM BUT I WILL CALL IT
TRACK AWARENESS. He is playing CHESS where others playing tic tac toe. He can extract the most out of any car on any track.
I believe that he should be I. The category of GOAT even though he is not I. The top 5 today. Being able to drive and perform in F1. For as long as he has without significant deterioration of reflexes.
I hope Alonso, Is able to race for as long as he is competitive enough.
Then he would make probably THE. BEST ENGINEER F1 has seen.( already able to change n control outcome of race by slowing g down, or towing other people.). He is able to see the big picture almost all the time.
In truth the more I learn about individual drivers the more I like them. Like Norris, tsunodA, and thr. A or one HAMILTON. In the past Hamilton was my least favorite driver. I saw and still see him taking people out of race(front tire bump) and making it seem an accident or circumstance of turn.( Verstappen wallcrash at 51g.) saying he turned into him, Not even asking how he was for about a minute.
Just didn’t like him at all. However since he has fallen and more I learn about him as a person the more I am cheering for him. Even being anointed a knight. He is Sir Lewis Hamilton. He has a life outside F1 that does not deal with racing?plays guitar and many other hobbies.
I think it would be a better idea to change the titke to "The day Ferbando Alonso almost died" so people don't think you are wishing death to Alonso
Anyone with 2 braincells SHOULD understand what he means in the title.
He wasn't trying to say that he should have died, he was saying that the crash would have killed him and any other driver who got in a crash like that in the time
I think the people who say the creator is saying he wanted alonso to die needs to understand english better.
People get in severe car accidents all the time and say “I should have died”. How do so many of you have such a poor grasp of the English language? It’s not a “wish death on Fernando” statement, for the love of god. It’s a “that accident was beyond bad enough to cause death, and therefore Fernando cheated death, and according to logic “should” have not survived the damage of that crash. How is this so difficult to understand?
for the love of god , you don't say "should have" to someone who have near-death accident, If the word came from Alonso himself then it's make sense. "could have" pretty much have the same meaning in this context and it is a better choice of word.
@@kazsimmonz96 yes you do 💀 when you get in severe crashes its very common for a DOCTOR to say "you shouldve died, you are very lucky" its just basic english, its fine its not your first language but just understand that you are wrong here, simply
@@sugihara5091 I mean... "could have" just work better? but whatever... you do you I guess
@@kazsimmonz96 then that would be improper english and would undermine the severity of the situation. there is no "doing me" in this situation. its just proper english
I sincerely think that doctors could use peoples' reactions to this video title as a means of testing if you have autism. Absolutely nuts how people are misinterpreting it!
people out here not understanding the title and just shitting on the guy
My guy you got to stop with the jump cuts show the whole wreck 😂
This was absolutely terrifying to watch I thought Fernando was dead when the car stopped moving it was an overwhelming feeling of relief to see Fernando out of the car and moving. This is one of those incidents that shows no matter safe the sport and cars are made racing will always be extremely dangerous.
I remember this well. My first thought was 'he's dead'. Thank God he wasn't even seriously injured.
I was in the stand that day right where he finished up. It all happened too quickly to comprehend. All of a sudden there was a cloud of gravel. Luckily he was quick to get out, to a large round of applause. I did get some cool shots of the damaged cars though.
The comments are filled with people who all appear to be professional content creators.
Just wanted to say thanks for the video and the work that you’ve put into this.
I remember seeing this live and it was incredible he walked away. I couldn’t even see where the car was at first
Amazing video. Really loved it. The story telling is up to the mark. The words, the hype being created and the script are all crisp. Keep on the good work. You gained a subscriber ❤️
Alonso is the goat, bro got out of the car like it was nothing
Mate i don't know if i m right or wrong but i think so this is the same turn where today george russel crashed in final lap behind alonso because of oversteer and dirty air affecting the grip
Yes you’re right but Russell crashed a little later in the corner
no it isn't, this is turn 3 what happened today was at turn 6
Alonso won't die until he's got his third title. He's that dedicated and tenacious! Though against Max, I'm not sure he'll manage.
5:24 I think that's not Australia :/
BTW it's Austria, for those they don't know
5:47 Gutierrez was driving for who?
Knowing about this Crash making his comment about the Crash at COTA Even more Crazy wäre he Said: ,,I've Never been so scared in my live“
I remember this really well when I was watching it, just the sheer shunt of the incident made me scared and seeing him out of the car was a massive relief, the way his car got to that point violently only made it worse, when I see him race now, am happy for him since that kind of force and shunt was real scary
Bro I remember this my heart dropped
Fernando Alonso is lucky to be alive
This and the Robert Kubica's crash in Montreal are some of the worst pre-halo crashes I've seen. it's a miracle both survived.
He walked out and football players cry for a penalty if they get tapped
What a legend to come out of this and recover so quick, i wish he gets to win champion again!.
Nice job by the way, its totaly better than netflix how are you not hired to do the job properly 🏎🏎❤❤❤
I really wish you would have shown a clip of the full crash, either the animated one or the real one. every time you showed the crash, it would get cut off, and it was never once fully shown.
Esteban made a fan out of me for his concern about Fernando.
That's how drivers should act after an accident
why is everyone hating on this video?
Alonso legendary Driver of Formula 1 ✨
Bro looks like Jesus on the cross in that thumbnail
The storytelling, context and information on these videos is second to none. Awesome work.
Thanks for these kind words mate ❤️
Also I Can't EVEN BELIEVE that Ferrari made a pit-stop mistake.
Halo has been one of the best things implemented in F1.
this is why the halo got implemented kids
Love this Video BTW. Sharing where I can!
"An F1 team must either build their own engine or be a works team to win the championship"
Well, about that...
This also reminds me of Kubica's terrible crash in Canada...
basically 14 minutes of yapping about something you could summarize in 2
A video made by a dramatic Gen Z I guess, one that started seeing F1 in the last 2 years. Kubica's accident in Canada was way worse. He actually looked dead for a minute and all. F1 is extremely safe nowadays.
Martin Brundle had a similar accident when he drove for Jordan. In fact, there's been several big crashes at turn 3, Albert Park.
The amazing development of F1 crash cells and Hanns devices saved Alonso that day
Alonso to Gutierrez: Why are you crying, did anyone die?
imagine if drive to survive was a thing then, they would've milked this moment dry
A British youtuber wanting an F1 GOAT to die... absolutely appalling.
not to sound like im riding Lulu's 12 inch meat, but the word "should" can be interpreted in two different ways
WTF Esteban Gutierez wasn't on a Ferrari, it was a haas
why did you shwo footage of drivers. startin g the formation lap when talking about the race start? and show footage of a race at the red bull ring when talking about australia?
this video is made way too dramaticly, the title is bad, the ai voices are horrible. and it talks bullshit for way too long
Yep, Alonso almost definitely should have died.
However, his car and the way it was constructed, definitely saved his life, that and quite a bit of luck on his part.
The fact that Alonso was able to get out of what was left of the car and physically walk unaided to the medical transport is a small miracle in and of itself.
Unfortunately most of the viewers are unable to grasp the obvious nuances of the English language and think the person making the video wants him dead.
Obviously never seen Martin Brundle's Melbourne Lap 1 shunt. Same track, same corner, made this one look SMALL. Car ended up in two pieces, Brundle took the restart...
Everyone saying that have “should” in the title is wrong. At that time it was a very unlikely to survive a crash like that. So at the time of the race yes he should have died but he somehow managed to survive
Talk about creating a drama for tha sake of a video full of hot air.
Using the Ferrari logo when talking about a Haas Ferrari, Ferrari is just the engine, the team was Haas, you didn't show a Honda logo for Alonso's car and call it a McLaren Honda
this can't even compare to Romain Grosjean's 2020 "burning man" crash
Should…bro he’s so good bro
serious props to the cameraman
Great video as always!
8:07 The camera did not like that.
It hurts my brain when i hear the 2015-16 engines right after hearing something from 2012
It was his rebirth, that's why he's young again.
nuh uh
Please change the title of the video, it's disrespectful
bro does NOT understand english
either that or the US school system did you dirty
It's not tho
@@imtf39No the admin should have use "could" and not "should" using "should" is implicating a negative meaning with compulsion in the video.
That’s how these RUclipsr attract views sadly
@@AnonymousGuy05Anyone could have died at any individual moment of there life. That would not make sense.
This is pure theatrical outrage. Words and phrases can have multiple meanings, and by all accounts he categorically SHOULD have died. He is very lucky.
His crash probably saved the lives of Shou and Grosjean, and maybe also Hamilton.
Looking back at things Ron Dennis sure wasn't wrong, no other team has won a constructor that didn't have a factory deal. The only team that came 2nd that didn't have a full works deal was RBR. Presently, only factory teams still finishing 2nd and with a cost cap. They still can't flush out the usual suspects.
Great video again mate!
Title meaning is too complex for some of the smoothbrains watching the video
Owned the pu**ies
Alonso has real double Halo and guardian angels all around him… 🍀❤️
The fact so many bits came flying off as he wrecked probably saved his life.
BTW, those words were Alonso's but on this segment, the audio with the voice actor's phony Spanish accent was not.
11:00 Casually dropped the hardest quote
"Should" is a little harsh. 😢
Would love to see a review of Roman Grosjean's 93g crash
Nvm I found it, you already have
“Altered the result in of the race”….. hmmmm💭
Watching this video with palms full of sweat...
I don't think there was any way Alonso could have passed the other car cleanly with that right turn coming up so quickly. If Alonso was able to get past the other car, I think he would have been carrying too much speed and caught his left tires in the gravel and gone into the barricade regardless. Also, I hated the look of those tiny, high rear wings on the cars from that short era.
He had another crash on his rookie year with Renault 2003 that was even worse than this
He may have had a hard time getting out if there was a halo device already back then?
Incredibly same kind of accident Jacques Villeneuve had with Ralf Schumacher at that same track and at the same place 15 years earlier. The difference was that Villeneuves crash was much worse. When canadian hit with his BAR-Honda in to Schumachers BMW Williams, there was higher speed and Villeneuves car lifted up to air immediately. It went totally in peaces when it ended up in to wall, minus the cockpit, and one of the track marsahlas got killed by the tire of Villeneuves car.
Another difference was that the Jacques/Ralf crash didn't bring out the Red Flag
Yeah that title is severely out of pocket, God forbid that anything bad happens to any F1 driver, thankfully for all stupid decisions FIA made, safety improvements aren't one of them
and he is still hitting up the griddy
Where i can find the background music??
should've given the haas a 20s penalty.... how dare he drive so slow at this high speed section...
Not even an english speaker and I still can understand the use of "should" lmao
bro used Ai for the quotes👀
2003 brasil was for sure worse, cuz safety wasn't really something known in that era and below it. And we all know that he couldn't even stand on one of his leg. And had to get in an ambulance on that idk how its called bed
The clips you have chosen throughout this video are shocking.
Anything before the Halo now seems more dangerous.
Should have?!?! Bro wtf
in some cases, "should have" refers to when something is expected to happen, but doesn't happen
In this context the use of "Should have" refers to the severity of the incident, being so severe by all odds he 'Should' have died, how ever he defied those odds be it by luck or training/ saftey engineering. so yes should have is the correct term and correctly relays the severity of the crash
Correct me if im wrong but these quotes from several people really sound like ai