To try everything Brilliant has to offer-free-for a full 30 days, visit brilliant.org/adumb/. The first 200 of you will get 20% off Brilliant’s annual premium subscription.
Don't think I really understood just how accessible this has all come when you can automate entire channels with AI already. Really interesting video and great motivation for me to continue studying Python :D
Very, very insightful analysis of a “real life” experiment, comparing the performance of an LLM versus a human. My take is that currently LLMs excel on quantity with “good enough quality “, but LLMs do not seem capable of “excellent” or “brilliant” performance. That conclusion looks intuitive to me: when I look at the output of any of the LLMs I’ve tested so far, I do get something that looks as the “average opinion/knowledge” of what I see on the internet using a search engine. Thinking about how LLMs operate, this is what I expect: the tokens with the highest probability are those that are found most often on the internet (this is also the cause for bias). Thus, documents published by exceptional people (let’s say, some genius) will receive a very low probability of being generated by the LLM. Anyway, I really enjoyed a lot this video, and I surely be looking for your future videos.
LLM's (unintentionally) are an exceptional way of representing the collective unconscious of WEIRD countries (Westernized, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, Democratic) and GPT 4 manifests this intangible "average" pretty eloquently. The problem with this lies in the famous quote by Schopenhauer: "All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident." Which is to say that yes, until the gears of society shift to accept the currently exceptional as codified and self-evident, the exceptional will remain fringe and speculative - outside the radar of LLM's. Although the same (speculative and fringe) attributes can be assigned to the unfalsifiable ramblings of a conspiracy theorist. The benefit of humans is that we can physically test hypothesis in the real world and receive actual feedback and experience, and this is what differentiates genius from actual insanity: truth - both in terms of accuracy, precision, and frequency. The point here is that to excel in excellence or brilliance, an AI (or AGI, to be more precise) would need to: 1. Be able to interact with the outside world and receive appliable feedback and experience from those interactions. 2. Be able to transfer that feedback to different (or unique, if taken one step further) scenarios, in essence mimicking the executive function and higher-level cognition of humans. (GPT 4 can already do the former, to an extent.) 3. Push boundaries and consequently face doubt, mockery, ridicule, or even violent opposition from the conclusions it generates. Speaking of speculation, since we're on the subject of hypothetical future AGI, I feel it helps to have a rough idea of the difference between consensus truth, empirical truth, and axiomatic truth. In my opinion fields like psychology, political science, ethics, economics, etc are too "fuzzy" for AI to have an opinion on, or to try to influence - at least until we have a complete mapping of the human brain and can understand more empirically how the brain works in its entirety. Until then its genius should remain confined to pushing the envelope on empirical and axiomatic truth.
LLMs are capable of producing far more compelling content if you prompt smarter and keep it more focused on something specific rather than just asking for generic lists, assigning the AI a personality/role with your opening prompt or custom instructions goes a long way on its own.
2:04 The first suggestion from GPT reads like it's telling people "Don't go towards death. Become Death for others." Is it suggesting people should kill others? LMAOO
Awesome video, as a dev myself I was wondering if it's possible to create something like this. Hope you will make it on this chanel with more interesting projects!
I can't find it, but I remember that RUclips had something in the terms of service against automated content (or perhaps against monetizing it). It's possible I misremember, but even if I do I think RUclips would be likely to add something like that to its TOS if purely automated content had the potential to go viral.
It would probably be good for everyone... except youtube. What's the difference from youtubes pov? They have content that generates views. Why would they care if it is human or AI generated?
@@asdads3948 Probably reducing bloat on the servers? The problem isn't that they get a couple of viral bot channels that make them money, the problem are the millions upon millions of bot channels that do nothing but take up space on their servers. Because lets be real here, if you can fully automate a channel people won't just have one channel. There will be bot farms with 100+ channels constantly uploading junk content daily that all belong to the same group of people, multiply that by many groups doing the same thing and the situation can quickly become unsustainable. Banning fully automated channels from receiving money won't stop all channels, as there probably would be loopholes but it will stop a lot of people from even attempting it.
@@asdads3948 I dont see any problem in it even for the viewers like dude as long as you're getting all get the information or entertainment in it or whatever you seek , viewer should be cool with that they are here for entertainment not investigating the creator.
If you had 100% automation it would be worth to have like 10 channels running without any interaction, even with a slow growth after years it would be great. The only work you be management to track problems and eventually have anew idea when one starts failing.
And now we are gonna have a flood of useless automated channels, this noise should settle down eventually but I hope it will be before RUclips will become flooded with bs like other platforms. The reels format is already destroying our attention span as it is...
RUclips has already reported that it wants to filter by AI content + there is no need to underestimate people, they will forget without revelations that something is wrong here)
That can only be the case with these disgusting shorts invention, long form content even if its being made with the help of Ai, there's no harm its still gonna provide you correct information or entertainment as obviously majority people do research and script at least by themselves or else its not gonna last longer.
And to be honest some Ai voices are so calm and deep that even without emphasising words we just want to listen it more and get relaxed, making us forget who made it.
What if you create 10+ accounts to play the lottery youtube game in the attempt one go viral? (each account would have a different video, but the same style)
You could run the experiment a second time with completely new channels but incorporating everything learned from the first run. After introducing the new style of quote of the day videos on the ai channel, it gained a significant boost in subscribers. Restarting the experiment, you could try to investigate how helpful this boost was in the long term.
This was so refreshing, thank you for sharing. I like using AI as a co-pilot instead of complete automation, it makes the work quicker and helps remove blockers, sort of like a muse... but that actually does the work and then you refine it.
the one thing missing is that the human channel has the ability to upload better quality content than daily facts and quotes. I know it is supposed to be an equal comparison but the entire point of not using ai is so you can produce better content than just quotes and facts
Really facinating. Also, i've got an idea. Maybe if you were to make some human made content for some time, you can reach the monetization threshold and continue automation from there.
This is extremely pertinent at this time since RUclips, as of 4/5/24, has blocked all ad blocking software on Android. I have been using Adblock, Adblock Plus and the Adblock browser on my devices for years. All of a sudden I am getting loud, _long_ adverts before and during videos. The only way I can interrupt them is to refresh the Adblock browser several times. I wouldn't mind paying a nominal fee to go ad free on YT, but the only option is to pay _$13.99 per month_ for YT premium. I don't need movies and TV. I just don't want to be rudely jarred out of meditation or sleep with my heart pounding. Imaging relaxing to the sounds of bilateral music to calm my ADHD, and all of a sudden someone is yelling in my ear. I am now desperately seeking an alternative. :-/
@@mummyjohn what’s inspiring about people subscribing to dumb shit Not everything needs a positive spin and that’s coming from someone who despises cynicism
do the youtube analytics tell you how many people click "don't recommend channel" it would be in interesting metric to compare for the human vs ai content if you can. I hit "don't recommend channel" for a lot of automated content, since the content isn't good, and the AI readers still don't seem to get sentence structure properly. They can't emphasise words correctly in a sentence, which is particularly maddening when they try to read stories.
I think whats more important to us viewers is correct information or entertainment, taking help of AI isn't bad, but leaving completely to it lacks to attract viewers emotional attachment.
In shorts is easier as literally people doesn't care if its Ai or human, our fast span mind doesn't calculate that much and just want to watch anything new every 30 seconds, this is why they succeed
Really hope platforms crack down on this type of content. is spammed everywhere and is so annoying. Most of the time the the tts doesnt make sense or is just flat out wrong, not to mention the images throw people off (picture of some random iceburg "the largest iceburg..." as if thats the picture of it)
Automation does not equal AI and I think that is a big distinction here. You could easily create a human written channel that utilises the automation techniques to speed up the video creation, creating multiple videos in a day and then scheduling them for the whole week. The success of both channels is a testament to your skills in creating the content template and themes.
It shouldn't be one or another. We should take the best of both worlds. We can come up with the creative and original ideas and use AI tooling to speed up the production process
Btw a tip for this videos thumbnail: include some text like ‘can AI beat a human?’ in it, really anything related to the videos topic that is decently clickbait-y. I think this will increase the amount of views you’ll get by quite a lot.
here's a better idea for this project : if you upload one good quality human made video once a week and let the ai make two videos everyday this will make people get subscribed to you from the quality video while watching the ai videos so ur channel doesn't become idle this way the youtube algorithm will get your videoes suggested much more.
I did the same thing, but I quickly realized it would cost quite a bit of money and probably never generate it back. How much money did this experiment cost?
Bro you earned my respect by your honesty, even i started my channel listening to this fake youtubers, and now i am stuck because no one gives me feedback whether my videos is good or bad😭
Putting this aside, the free version of Chat GPT seems to get stupider every day. It might be just me, but I don't think so because it makes mistakes on basic math questions like asking it to add up numbers 1, 2, 3, 4, 5... 10. To be exact, it does the calculation manually by writing down the equation in a regular format (which is understandable) but it makes mistakes in writing by duplicating the numbers and then gives the wrong answer. I don't remember Chat GPT making such weird mistakes just a few months ago.
I think it would also be fair to give AI feedback in numbers of views so it can improve its videos somehow. I suppose it would be hard, but maybe then it would have some viral videos and thousands of views.
Wow, this is such an interesting experiment! I love how you've created two distinct channels to compare the success they would achieve. It's fascinating to see the combination of handmade videos and AI-generated content in action. Both approaches have their own unique qualities and advantages. The handmade videos bring a personal touch and creativity that can truly resonate with viewers. The effort, time, and craftsmanship involved in creating them can be appreciated, and it adds an element of authenticity to the content. On the other hand, the AI-generated channel offers a different perspective, leveraging the power of technology to generate intriguing quotes and facts. It's amazing to witness how AI can contribute to content creation. I'm excited to see the results of this experiment and discover which channel garners more success. It's a great opportunity to explore the preferences of the audience and understand the impact of different content creation methods. Kudos to you for pushing the boundaries and exploring new avenues in content creation. Keep up the fantastic work, and I'll be eagerly following both channels to see how they progress! (Written by ChatGPT)
However, subs/views doe not necessarily mean "better" ... That's a super-loaded word and a juicy, cool, uplifting and informative channel is something very different from an addictive collage.
you should redo this video at some point in the future to see whats changed as more AI tools become available and existing ones get better (or worse in some cases)
Make luck a statistic. Create 1000 channels and you can have bigger pool of testing and more opportunities to succeed. You may get a good idea but that idea might just not do well on that particular ai channel. If it works on most channels then you implement it. The channels don't have to be very successful, just successful enough. AI technology also is getting better and better and AI channels will only experience growth. There will probably soon come a day when most content on youtube is AI generated.
I think you should upload more with the AI channel, a more realistic test would be 100 videos per day as it is the maximum amount of video you can upload with a classic API key. On youtube quantity > quality by FAR. You can consistently make 100.000 subs in a month by uploading a few thousands times a day the exact same video, so with AI it can be way better and avoid the ban hammer. And if you want to make money, as you said monetization is really tough. Getting the channel certified and selling it is a way, but there are only so much buyers out there, and it takes a lot of time.
This is like a mathematical proof for the dead internet theory. I think of it being like checkers. Yes, checkers is a solved game mathematically, but we still haven't mapped out all moves. Thus, it still requires plenty of skill to play and be good at it.
To try everything Brilliant has to offer-free-for a full 30 days, visit brilliant.org/adumb/. The first 200 of you will get 20% off Brilliant’s annual premium subscription.
There's a certain irony that YouTude named you @Human-279
Sup!
You sound like making videos is easy, actually?
Importantly, this kind of long-form high quality thoughtful analysis can't even be produced by most people much less an AI.
ive seen ai shorts with 1000x the views of this video though
@@fergalhennessy775 tis luck in the algorithm
@@fergalhennessy775They are talking about quality, not success
@@silviocupica2521 nobody goes to yt shorts for quality lil bro
@@fergalhennessy775 You agree with him and then call him lil bro? ok kid
dude getting a sponsor in just your fifth ever video is such a huge flex
Brilliant basically sponsors any educational channel lol
@@Trifect69420 to be honest you are accurate. I have seen Brillant sponsorships from other educational channel. Not as much flex.
That goes crazy 😂
Listen to how this guy works, he doesn’t need sponsors dude is guaranteed a millionaire from his day job.
dsa
Plot twist, it turns out that adumb himself is an extremely sophisticated ai.
Yes
_audible gasp_
Yes
Yes
Yes
Actually nuts that you managed to get nearly 500 subscribers in a month on an AI channel
@@youbetyourwrasse if you like the content then what's the issue?
People love junk food.
thats how much subs i got on my youtube channel that i put weekly effort into between ages 14 and 17. not that im jealous or anything..
@@thedistinguished5255 tbf, short form content is a much easier way to get subs than long form
Nuts 😋
Congrats on getting sponsored already, your projects are awesome
Plot twist: this is the ai channel
_audible gasp_
Lol ikr 😂
You can tell by the voice 😂
lol
I'm sure I've come across a few of your reels before on youtube 😂😂
It's a real fight to get the algorithm to stop suggesting ai generated garbage
On RUclips they are called shorts 🤓☝️
@@icyboyy6177nice face reveal.
Dude, you your creations are really next level man!
Man flexing he can make a large yt channel from scratch, but chooses to stay with this format for his integrity, hats off
nicely done, showing pros and cons of an automated channel with actual data
might be worth re-doing this experiment now with GPT4 and more sophisticated tools overall
This is a real gem of a channel. I love seeing this content, and you really inspire me to work on some cool hacks like this too!
Don't think I really understood just how accessible this has all come when you can automate entire channels with AI already. Really interesting video and great motivation for me to continue studying Python :D
Uhhh...you get the AI to run python. You don't write it yourself.
@@yougeo You do write yourself the code, the AWS instance he created didnt appear magically
Great video. I really appreciate the approach and thoroughness
Clipclamp or whatever it’s called is useful because it can make short videos using stock footage and it already has a voice and it adds music
Very, very insightful analysis of a “real life” experiment, comparing the performance of an LLM versus a human. My take is that currently LLMs excel on quantity with “good enough quality “, but LLMs do not seem capable of “excellent” or “brilliant” performance.
That conclusion looks intuitive to me: when I look at the output of any of the LLMs I’ve tested so far, I do get something that looks as the “average opinion/knowledge” of what I see on the internet using a search engine. Thinking about how LLMs operate, this is what I expect: the tokens with the highest probability are those that are found most often on the internet (this is also the cause for bias). Thus, documents published by exceptional people (let’s say, some genius) will receive a very low probability of being generated by the LLM.
Anyway, I really enjoyed a lot this video, and I surely be looking for your future videos.
LLM's (unintentionally) are an exceptional way of representing the collective unconscious of WEIRD countries (Westernized, Educated, Industrialized, Rich, Democratic) and GPT 4 manifests this intangible "average" pretty eloquently.
The problem with this lies in the famous quote by Schopenhauer: "All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident."
Which is to say that yes, until the gears of society shift to accept the currently exceptional as codified and self-evident, the exceptional will remain fringe and speculative - outside the radar of LLM's.
Although the same (speculative and fringe) attributes can be assigned to the unfalsifiable ramblings of a conspiracy theorist. The benefit of humans is that we can physically test hypothesis in the real world and receive actual feedback and experience, and this is what differentiates genius from actual insanity: truth - both in terms of accuracy, precision, and frequency.
The point here is that to excel in excellence or brilliance, an AI (or AGI, to be more precise) would need to:
1. Be able to interact with the outside world and receive appliable feedback and experience from those interactions.
2. Be able to transfer that feedback to different (or unique, if taken one step further) scenarios, in essence mimicking the executive function and higher-level cognition of humans. (GPT 4 can already do the former, to an extent.)
3. Push boundaries and consequently face doubt, mockery, ridicule, or even violent opposition from the conclusions it generates.
Speaking of speculation, since we're on the subject of hypothetical future AGI, I feel it helps to have a rough idea of the difference between consensus truth, empirical truth, and axiomatic truth. In my opinion fields like psychology, political science, ethics, economics, etc are too "fuzzy" for AI to have an opinion on, or to try to influence - at least until we have a complete mapping of the human brain and can understand more empirically how the brain works in its entirety. Until then its genius should remain confined to pushing the envelope on empirical and axiomatic truth.
LLMs are capable of producing far more compelling content if you prompt smarter and keep it more focused on something specific rather than just asking for generic lists, assigning the AI a personality/role with your opening prompt or custom instructions goes a long way on its own.
This is the beginning of the dead internet theory
2:04 The first suggestion from GPT reads like it's telling people "Don't go towards death. Become Death for others." Is it suggesting people should kill others? LMAOO
Suggestion from gpt?
5:13 pov gen alpha: yay
BUT YOU COULD JUST REQUEST the quotable api so it generates a random quote each time.
Based on the diagram in the "complete automation" section, that's exactly what they did
This was a very interesting idea and the execution was amazing. Good video!
Honestly, using a script for editing but doing actual voiceover and research would split the difference on what matters.
Yeah, there’s probably an ideal intersection that maximizes the benefits of both approaches.
Awesome video, as a dev myself I was wondering if it's possible to create something like this. Hope you will make it on this chanel with more interesting projects!
This channel is really cool, man! Looking forward to seeing what you do next!
I can't find it, but I remember that RUclips had something in the terms of service against automated content (or perhaps against monetizing it). It's possible I misremember, but even if I do I think RUclips would be likely to add something like that to its TOS if purely automated content had the potential to go viral.
Prtobably them Simps working there have no way to detect it.
It would probably be good for everyone... except youtube. What's the difference from youtubes pov? They have content that generates views. Why would they care if it is human or AI generated?
@@asdads3948 Probably reducing bloat on the servers? The problem isn't that they get a couple of viral bot channels that make them money, the problem are the millions upon millions of bot channels that do nothing but take up space on their servers. Because lets be real here, if you can fully automate a channel people won't just have one channel. There will be bot farms with 100+ channels constantly uploading junk content daily that all belong to the same group of people, multiply that by many groups doing the same thing and the situation can quickly become unsustainable. Banning fully automated channels from receiving money won't stop all channels, as there probably would be loopholes but it will stop a lot of people from even attempting it.
@@asdads3948 I dont see any problem in it even for the viewers like dude as long as you're getting all get the information or entertainment in it or whatever you seek , viewer should be cool with that they are here for entertainment not investigating the creator.
If you had 100% automation it would be worth to have like 10 channels running without any interaction, even with a slow growth after years it would be great.
The only work you be management to track problems and eventually have anew idea when one starts failing.
ai replaced the prayer service reflection at my school. not even religion is safe from the ai apocalypse
Seems like this vid couldn't hack it in the algo but I really enjoyed it.
this is extremely interesting! keep up the good work
... I swear to god I've seen the short you showed in this video. (Specifically the quote one..)
And now we are gonna have a flood of useless automated channels, this noise should settle down eventually but I hope it will be before RUclips will become flooded with bs like other platforms. The reels format is already destroying our attention span as it is...
RUclips has already reported that it wants to filter by AI content + there is no need to underestimate people, they will forget without revelations that something is wrong here)
That can only be the case with these disgusting shorts invention, long form content even if its being made with the help of Ai, there's no harm its still gonna provide you correct information or entertainment as obviously majority people do research and script at least by themselves or else its not gonna last longer.
And to be honest some Ai voices are so calm and deep that even without emphasising words we just want to listen it more and get relaxed, making us forget who made it.
What if you create 10+ accounts to play the lottery youtube game in the attempt one go viral? (each account would have a different video, but the same style)
Came here after watching your Wikipedia video…I think I just lost the rest of the workday to catching up on your channel 😂
same
You could run the experiment a second time with completely new channels but incorporating everything learned from the first run. After introducing the new style of quote of the day videos on the ai channel, it gained a significant boost in subscribers. Restarting the experiment, you could try to investigate how helpful this boost was in the long term.
tbh i don't like automated channels i usualy block them i am on RUclips for the people behind the videos :)
This was so refreshing, thank you for sharing. I like using AI as a co-pilot instead of complete automation, it makes the work quicker and helps remove blockers, sort of like a muse... but that actually does the work and then you refine it.
thumb nails can be made pretty easily with ai or at least spisific ones like 3d animated roblox thumbails
the one thing missing is that the human channel has the ability to upload better quality content than daily facts and quotes. I know it is supposed to be an equal comparison but the entire point of not using ai is so you can produce better content than just quotes and facts
dude this was such interesting and high quality video, well done
This guy rocks! Amazing video
A really neat video idea!!! Love your channel! Keep going!
''In this tutorial I will teach you how to ruin the internet even more"
how does this only have 8k views 😭😭😭 this deserves millions fr
Broo this shows how far AI has gone you can create 10 AI channels and then 💥 it will blow youtube
Really facinating.
Also, i've got an idea. Maybe if you were to make some human made content for some time, you can reach the monetization threshold and continue automation from there.
If you wanted to make the AI part a bit smarter, train it to optimise both views and subs, and adjust its content accordingly
Tuvok was a great choice for the voice over AI.
Bro the volume just went up for some reason on my phone and its loud AF
Amazingly implemented.
This is extremely pertinent at this time since RUclips, as of 4/5/24, has blocked all ad blocking software on Android. I have been using Adblock, Adblock Plus and the Adblock browser on my devices for years. All of a sudden I am getting loud, _long_ adverts before and during videos. The only way I can interrupt them is to refresh the Adblock browser several times. I wouldn't mind paying a nominal fee to go ad free on YT, but the only option is to pay _$13.99 per month_ for YT premium. I don't need movies and TV. I just don't want to be rudely jarred out of meditation or sleep with my heart pounding. Imaging relaxing to the sounds of bilateral music to calm my ADHD, and all of a sudden someone is yelling in my ear. I am now desperately seeking an alternative. :-/
Try newpipe or RUclips revanced.
Try using the Brave Browser. I find it is good at cutting out adds.
I feel like this kind of stuff would work better with reddit stories rather than quotes.
"Your friendly neighborhood human" doesn't sound like a sinister robot at all.
Great video. Horribly depressing.
We are clearly doomed
the opportunity to find something inspiring, and yet you go for depressing.
Only if people decide computer > human
@@gavine2363Obviously it has already been decided
@@mummyjohn what’s inspiring about people subscribing to dumb shit
Not everything needs a positive spin and that’s coming from someone who despises cynicism
I wish you had given the actual amount of money you made from each channel... that is an important piece of the puzzle
Bro your channel is really interesting, you have high quality informative content, and I know how hard and time consuming it is
You should try whisper for the transcription, worked well for me
do the youtube analytics tell you how many people click "don't recommend channel" it would be in interesting metric to compare for the human vs ai content if you can.
I hit "don't recommend channel" for a lot of automated content, since the content isn't good, and the AI readers still don't seem to get sentence structure properly. They can't emphasise words correctly in a sentence, which is particularly maddening when they try to read stories.
I think whats more important to us viewers is correct information or entertainment, taking help of AI isn't bad, but leaving completely to it lacks to attract viewers emotional attachment.
In shorts is easier as literally people doesn't care if its Ai or human, our fast span mind doesn't calculate that much and just want to watch anything new every 30 seconds, this is why they succeed
3:05 this is over complicated
Really hope platforms crack down on this type of content. is spammed everywhere and is so annoying. Most of the time the the tts doesnt make sense or is just flat out wrong, not to mention the images throw people off (picture of some random iceburg "the largest iceburg..." as if thats the picture of it)
It would definitely be interesting if you uploaded the videos to other platforms such as tiktok and instagram.
Plot twist this video was made by AI
Automation does not equal AI and I think that is a big distinction here. You could easily create a human written channel that utilises the automation techniques to speed up the video creation, creating multiple videos in a day and then scheduling them for the whole week. The success of both channels is a testament to your skills in creating the content template and themes.
Google's "I'm feeling curious" is a really nice fun fact generator
It shouldn't be one or another. We should take the best of both worlds. We can come up with the creative and original ideas and use AI tooling to speed up the production process
I think some kind of combination would rock though
Btw a tip for this videos thumbnail: include some text like ‘can AI beat a human?’ in it, really anything related to the videos topic that is decently clickbait-y. I think this will increase the amount of views you’ll get by quite a lot.
I was wondering if you could maybe do it so that if a AI video has less likes, comments, or shares, it would adjust its content
you were so concerned with whether or not you could, you never stopped to consider whether or not you should
here's a better idea for this project : if you upload one good quality human made video once a week and let the ai make two videos everyday this will make people get subscribed to you from the quality video while watching the ai videos so ur channel doesn't become idle this way the youtube algorithm will get your videoes suggested much more.
Youre still underrated as hell
Incredible video, deserves more attention
I did the same thing, but I quickly realized it would cost quite a bit of money and probably never generate it back.
How much money did this experiment cost?
Bro you earned my respect by your honesty, even i started my channel listening to this fake youtubers, and now i am stuck because no one gives me feedback whether my videos is good or bad😭
Putting this aside, the free version of Chat GPT seems to get stupider every day. It might be just me, but I don't think so because it makes mistakes on basic math questions like asking it to add up numbers 1, 2, 3, 4, 5... 10. To be exact, it does the calculation manually by writing down the equation in a regular format (which is understandable) but it makes mistakes in writing by duplicating the numbers and then gives the wrong answer. I don't remember Chat GPT making such weird mistakes just a few months ago.
Almost 13 hours and this video is still at 900 views. :(
I think it would also be fair to give AI feedback in numbers of views so it can improve its videos somehow. I suppose it would be hard, but maybe then it would have some viral videos and thousands of views.
this was a super interesting video thank you so much for doing it so perfectly
Monetising shorts is actually damn hard, Google is keeping so much money
Wow, this is such an interesting experiment! I love how you've created two distinct channels to compare the success they would achieve. It's fascinating to see the combination of handmade videos and AI-generated content in action. Both approaches have their own unique qualities and advantages.
The handmade videos bring a personal touch and creativity that can truly resonate with viewers. The effort, time, and craftsmanship involved in creating them can be appreciated, and it adds an element of authenticity to the content. On the other hand, the AI-generated channel offers a different perspective, leveraging the power of technology to generate intriguing quotes and facts. It's amazing to witness how AI can contribute to content creation.
I'm excited to see the results of this experiment and discover which channel garners more success. It's a great opportunity to explore the preferences of the audience and understand the impact of different content creation methods. Kudos to you for pushing the boundaries and exploring new avenues in content creation. Keep up the fantastic work, and I'll be eagerly following both channels to see how they progress!
(Written by ChatGPT)
this was very interesting, good video
The king has returned
Very useful experiment!
Plot twist: this video idea was generated by AI.
Interesting analysis!
However, subs/views doe not necessarily mean "better" ... That's a super-loaded word and a juicy, cool, uplifting and informative channel is something very different from an addictive collage.
you should redo this video at some point in the future to see whats changed as more AI tools become available and existing ones get better (or worse in some cases)
You could vastly improve the ai videos just by using better ai music and ai voice just with the huge improvement in ai since this video came out
Can you make a video on where you will tell how we can use 11labs through api?❤❤❤❤
Make luck a statistic. Create 1000 channels and you can have bigger pool of testing and more opportunities to succeed. You may get a good idea but that idea might just not do well on that particular ai channel. If it works on most channels then you implement it. The channels don't have to be very successful, just successful enough. AI technology also is getting better and better and AI channels will only experience growth. There will probably soon come a day when most content on youtube is AI generated.
I would have liked to know how much the AWS cost for that pipeline was. I'm guessing not that much.
3:17 that looks exactly like the grade A garbage I see on shorts
Man i hope you make it because i love the content
I think you should upload more with the AI channel, a more realistic test would be 100 videos per day as it is the maximum amount of video you can upload with a classic API key.
On youtube quantity > quality by FAR. You can consistently make 100.000 subs in a month by uploading a few thousands times a day the exact same video, so with AI it can be way better and avoid the ban hammer.
And if you want to make money, as you said monetization is really tough. Getting the channel certified and selling it is a way, but there are only so much buyers out there, and it takes a lot of time.
I always immediately scroll if it's an ai voice. Usually the channels always use the same male/female one and it gets so repetitive
its always adam from the elevenlabs voice library
The most amazing thing about this is that google didnt immediately delete the channel
This is like a mathematical proof for the dead internet theory. I think of it being like checkers. Yes, checkers is a solved game mathematically, but we still haven't mapped out all moves. Thus, it still requires plenty of skill to play and be good at it.
Literally got an ad for an ai youtube video generator right in the middle of this
3:09 don’t look at the second line of code