Prof.Tim Maudlin of NYU on Physics and Philosophy
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 4 июл 2024
- Scientific Sense ® by Gill Eapen: Prof.Tim Maudlin is Professor of Philosophy at NYU. His research interests include foundations of physics, metaphysics, logic, and philosophy of science.
Please subscribe to this channel:
ruclips.net/user/ScientificS... 
Наука
Just wanted to say that I actively seek out Tim Maudlin’s lectures and podcast interviews/conversations because he’s the type of deeply thoughtful and passionate science educator I wish I had when I was in high school and college.
Thanks!
Prof TimMaud is my # 1 go to guy for ultimate reality questions. What’s time ? What’s space ? What is expansion ? He has answered so many questions for me through his hard work in the global scientific community’s. If there was a physics hall of fame ( no not the Nobel prize for me it seems rigged ), he would be equivalent to Joe DiMaggio, a real hero. Your hard work is going to resonate into time ❤
Thank you SS for putting this together
20:30 creativity always helps ! It helps evolving the mind when you leave the mind uncontrolled. Nature is best example watch how baby deer are born , how they evolve , it is way more amazing then one can image if they can grasp what is happening. I even believe animals have their own physics and science within their reality. One day we will learn from bees and birds some levels of ultimate reality we couldn’t have imaged. It’s not going to be like “what’s spooky action at a distance” that’s not what helps animals evolve so why bother ? But who knows ?
Im enjoying how down to earth the talk is yet how sophisticated. Im not a physics PHD and I can get it , thanks for that !
Very Informative Content! Great Interview ❤❤❤❤
This is a fantastic interview. One of the best you have done, Gill. I started watching at 2:45 am and got so caught up in the conversation that I am still up at 3:45 am! A bit more on philosophy would have been nice, but I understand that time was short. Impressed at how many items you packed in there already. Prof. Maudlin is very thorough, concise and articulate in explaining things. I learned a lot.
Newtonian dynamics should come with a warning when learning about it, but it doesn't. I remember dedicating myself back in high school so that I could take AP physics and calculus in my senior year, by actually taking 6 years of math in high school, 2 in college mostly A's. I went into that year as a total machine, I saw everything in the world as trigonometry and physics, I could do most of the math in my head, I was completely at the peak of Dunning-Krueger false confidence. When confronted with quantum mechanics and calculus I was rudely shoved over the edge of a cliff. I fell into a deep depression that senior year and failed those courses, I never really recovered.
not really claiming anything is particularly wrong with what tim said, but claiming certain variables have a dependence is something completely reasonable as long as the form of the dependence is reasonable and has plausible theories associate with it.