Plato. Three Parts of the Soul (A Short Course on Philosophy)
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 3 апр 2013
- Mini Lecture by Professor Jennifer Lisa Vest
📸 Instagram: @spiritteacher
👍 Facebook: @DrVestMedicalIntuitive
🌐 Website: drjenniferlisavest.com
🌳 Explore My World in One Click: linktr.ee/SpiritTeacher
❤️ Spread the Love: Give us a thumbs up, drop a comment, and share this video with your loved ones on social media, your website, or blog.
🌟 Support My Channel's Growth: Your engagement goes a long way in letting RUclips know you appreciate our content. By doing so, you're helping us reach a wider audience that can benefit from these videos.
🔔 Don't Miss Out: Subscribe for fresh content!
Subscribe now: @JenniferLisaVest
this helped to shed light
Thank you!
SO glad it helped. Miss teaching my philo students!
please make more videos on philosophy. Love from Pakistan 🇵🇰
Thank you for this mini-lecture. Just what I needed to get a decent overview.
omg Soooo confused right now. she would say "riiiiiggght?" then be like, "on no, sorry, i meant this ....... right?" No its not alright, you lost me after passion is in conflict with appetite and reason? then the man who was wronged and the wrong do-er was completely incomprehensible for me... i did not understand the second half of this what so ever. so frustrated
Please stop ending your sentences with "Right?" It's making it difficult for me to listen to you.
See my comment above about the use of right by philosophy professors. It is rooted in the Socratic tradition. Generally in philosophy we focus on arguments and engaging each other's arguments rather than critiquing general and rather minor rhetorical trends in the discipline
Ok I like the way you start, your vibe, your penetration of the material. But, love, there is one big issue. I'm 22 seconds in and you have anchored the word Right, 3 times, which is annoying and purposeless to the listener. You use it to keep rhythm. I wish teachers would learn conversational hypnosis, because words have a very important role in logos, which is experiential, and the western philosophers are missing the mark. Anchor the important words, and make a tapestry that weaves the mind unto another plane. Right.
god i can't believe you condescendingly called her "love." gross af. she's a fucking professor, professional, and obvs knows what she's talking about. jesus fucking christ.
i wish she replied with "right"
ps sounds like he's using a lot of 'big words' to sound smarter than he is
The use of the word "right" by philosophers is common because of the Socratic tradition in philosophy. You say right to suggest that you are engaging the audience, you are asking the audience to agree with you. If you read Socrates you will understand this rhetorical approach. Every time Socrates makes an argument he asks his interlocutor to agree with him by saying some version of isn't that so? Right? With regard to your dismissal of the word as a rhythm keeper, I DO think rhythm is important for speaking and teaching and as a published poet and spoken word performer (and a trained hypnotist) I have found rhythm to be very effective for teaching. I am not sure your generalized critique of Western philosophers applies to me as I am not a Western philosopher, properly speaking though some of my methods are western due to my cross-cultural training. Even if I were, it is never effective to make generalized dismissals of groups of thinkers. Thank you for your comments, sweetie! Oops, why am I using a term of endearment for you? Hmmmm...why are you? You might consider refraining from using terms of endearment like"love" when addressing women philosophers. Its unprofessional and patronizing.
@@erikaruiz8539 I can't believe you use such unintelligent, remedial language.Curse words show a limited mind and vocabulary so before you criticize another try using adult words and not those of a teenager.