That was from our 16 gun shoot last July. You can watch a full vid at The #MGC2022 16 Gun #VickersMG Shoot at Bisley ruclips.net/video/lARgVokqQ48/видео.html. Make sure you subscribe too.
Except for: not being used by Nazis, not being built by slave labour, able to do this for hours without having to change barrels, not exploding because the bolts bounce and a few other things I’m sure.
Thanks Rich and team. It was great to see all that live firing, given that most of the world thinks that UK civilians have no means to own and fire private collections of historic machine guns.
@@pcka12 My pistols went then too. First all the full bore ones, then a year later Labour came to power and out-nannied the Tories by banning the rimfire ones as well. That just left me with rifles and air weapons.
@@derekp2674 @pcka12 well we hold pistols as well. Yes, they're prohibited weapons but thankfully the right justifications mean we have sufficient good reason to possess them. We'll be putting together a short video on the legalities of possessing prohibited weapons in the UK this week so make sure you subscribe and check it out when it goes live. If you like what we need and want to contribute to that 'good reason' then become one of our patrons at www.patreon.com/vickersmg
@@vickersmg Thanks for the update. I'm sure I'm already subscribed in RUclips and I have already donated to your most recent appeal for funds. As I'm based fairly close to Swindon, I expect I'll be able to get along to one of your open days soon. I'm currently studying the recoil dynamics of rifle grenades, so if you have any relevant artefacts for that quest, I would be interested to see those too.
This video and the uploader's channel is really underrated, i love how you guys explain the most common questions of how the guns work in such short amount of time, 6 minutes and 1 second!
I remember the L4, which was the 7.62mm variant of the Bren, from my time in the TA. I never tried firing it standing up and only ever used it with the bipod. The main thing I remember was the insane accuracy which was mainly down to its long barrel.
The days before hearing protection? We regularly fire inside buildings with them as part of our demonstrations and normal ear defenders work fine - it's the pressure wave that surprises most people.
Nice to see someone using proper hand placement on the Bren, unlike so many Americans who talk about it who have got no idea where to put their left hands at all.
Great point. This is the safe way to do it: holding under the ejection cover is going to give you a bad day straight away and holding the barrel handle has the risk of it breaking (and we’ve seen it done but thankfully not while firing).
My father told me about his experience with the Lewis gun when he was a young soldier in WW2. As a DEMS gunner he did several trips on colliers running down the east coast through the straits of Dover. He travelled with a No.2. who had the ammo. They used to hope for a minor attack by a German plane , it gave them an excuse to ditch the remaining ammo and not have to lug it all back to barracks.
@@trappenweisseguy27 Defencibly Equipped Merchant Ship. . My father was in the Maritime Regiment of the Royal Artillery. Soldiers at sea. The unit casualties were very high, mostly fatal when ships were sunk.
Great video. You mentioned the Czech origins of the Bren, but I wish you would have mentioned the American origins of the Lewis. Thanks again. Please keep these weapons and their history alive for the future.
Absolutely James. Merely a case of not balancing the information and not scripting it precisely either. We'll do more on the Lewis and its introduction in the coming months, albeit we bought it from the Belgians rather than the US. Remarkably it was trialed in the same round of machine gun trials as the Vickers in 1912.
British re-design, British build, British used the vast majority in service. Pedants, of which there seem to be a lot about, would say that the ZB was Czechoslovakian but the Bren was British.
The Lewis gun (or Lewis automatic machine gun or Lewis automatic rifle) is a First World War-era light machine gun. Designed privately in the United States though not adopted there, the design was finalized and mass-produced in the United Kingdom.
Don’t forget Belgium’s involvement in giving Lewis the initial production capacity after the US said no. We will do a full video on the Lewis at some point but couldn’t get all the information in this one.
Interesting listening to the different cyclic rates of the Vickers. I was fortunate enough to get to fire one of the last Vickers used in the NZ Army when I first joined. However, I really liked the BREN - used to fire single shot as though it was just a rifleman firing and then open up on auto when the time came. Just needed good trigger control. The GPMG killed them both off.
They just had different fusee spring tensions that adjusts the rate of fire slightly. You can balance two or three guns together quite easily but not possible on this one. The Bren drills you were using for single shot were exactly as described in the 1939 pamphlet!
@@vickersmg I was told by an "old Vickers gunner" that there were 22 different stoppages on the Vickers and you needed to know every one by heart so that your IA drills were second nature. I think he was one of the last in the Army left over from Korea - he looked old enough for that. I don't know if this is true - I ended up as a Coy Comdr so didn't get to fire the MG that much.
Thanks Jonathan. Praise indeed. Send the gaming community here when you need a break and we'll have a cardboard cutout some time soon ;o) No one seems to want to tackle the intricacies of MMGs in a gaming scenario though.
It was actually used by Australian militia battalions (infantry) in Papua New Guinea during the early Kokoda Campaign of 1942, along with the Bren - militia units such as the 38th Battalion bring certainly second rate in equipment and training compared to the veteran units of the 2nd AIF
Just imagine that you are a german charging british trench and suddenly you hear 5:45 . I can imagine that only 2 or 3 of those Vickers machine guns could be amazingly effective at suppressing the enemy...
That’s exactly what Japanese soldiers walked into at the Battle of Imphal in a gully and their commander kept sending more up to be cut down by the defenders
@@davidknight1119 Gotta love the scene from The last samurai when they brought up the gatlings… The movie is inspired by the battle of Shiroyama if I’m not mistaken
My grandad was a bren and Vickers gunner in WW2. 1st Battalion 22nd Cheshire Reg... Always remember him telling me "a tip" give the butt a little tap to spread the bullets out...not sure that was much use to a 10 year old...but I remember it still... I miss my grandad, and that generation as a whole 😢
That’s great! My grandad was 7th Bn Cheshires and one of the first things he told me at about the same age was the 2-inch tap! It’s officially called the ‘consistency of tap’ and if you watch the full live-streamed vid of the July 2022 shoot we demonstrate it as well. It was useful to me as I bought the first Vickers aged 12 (a deac) and it’s all gone from there. - Rich
Not sure many countries had an automatic rifle the same as the BAR, which is arguably forced into an LMG role as the Browning M1919 is an MMG when on the tripod and only an LMG in the A6 role.
The cool thing with the Vickers was that it could, and at least in WW1, frequently was, be used as an indirect fire weapon. You could cover an area of ground with indirect fire MMG rounds, denying the enemy passage through that area.
A tactic developed in the First World War but definitely expanded on in the Second World War with the introducing of the dial sight and Mark 8z ammunition extending the range to 4,500 yards. Nearly 100 Vickers with the Australians at El Alamein firing on the same plan and the late-war ‘pepperpots’ saw them used alongside artillery and even tanks for indirect fire.
the vickers should definitely be a deployable structure similar to how AT guns are currently placed in game, with a new loadout for MG that allows them to build it
We just replied to your other message to but check out the roles of the original teams - interesting to think how this could work: vickersmg.blog/in-use/transport/man-carrying-the-mmg/
In 1944 during the campaign in the lowlands one of the sergeants in the 52 recon (the fighting fifty second reece Lowland Division) was commended for his ability to us the bren like a sniper rifle on single shot on one occasion movement was noted in a ditch the only part of the enemy showing was his backside which he put a round through the victim was a German officer who while getting treatment for his wound complimented him on his shooting.
For ranges less than 400yds, it's a great stable weapon to fire from. Take a look at the 'Sniper Bren' video we did a couple of years ago. ruclips.net/video/mF986OB11o4/видео.html
Plenty of interesting ways to build that in: multi-player teams, barrel changes when the No 2 is close enough, more ammunition from across the platoon; greater range when firing from the tripod and upgrades to Mark 8z ammunition to give up to 4500 yards range on the Vickers. Perhaps even incorporate them into the use of the Universal carrier. Plenty of scope.
Great video , superb collection of history & great to see them out and putting copper & lead across the paddock. ✅ What brand and grain of.303 ammunition are you using ?
Obviously this would require a lot of ball and tracer to pull off but one day I would like to see just how hard you could lean on a Bren for sustained fire before encountering a stoppage that can't be remedied at the gas regulator. I've never heard stories of them choking while fighting in defence.
It would have to be a breakage I think, which would beg the question as to how worn the parts are in the first place. Nothing is new enough to make that good research sadly.
Brens came with a spare barrel, so it could be changed after 10 magazines of sustained fire. An advancing section would barely have enough ammunition to need it.
@@ethelminiA section would be carrying at least 2 spare mags per rifleman or more if needed. That's as many as 9 riflemen with 18 mags. That is not counting what the gunner carried or the cases of mags carried in the universal carriers or the sections Bedford. Brens were most certainly used fighting in defence as well with transit cases of magazines to hand 4:47 .
No, we don’t have a No 2 Mk 1 currently. We will be adapting one of our No 1 Mk 1 guns at some point as there aren’t any permanent modifications to fit.
The basic gun is exactly the same and they could easily have components interchangeable between them. The No 2 Mk I used by Commandos was a ‘B’ variant as the ‘A’ was actually an RAF land service gun used for local airfield defence.
This is one of our manuals that shows more about the different types of guns. The bipod mounting isn’t covered as that comes later but this is the ‘A’ variant. archive.org/details/1938ukap1641bwithamds/page/n27/mode/1up
I am not British by any means, but I am happy that in GB there are passionate people like You all, preserving their firearms traditions! (even if the laws are no joke) Your shooting videos are marvelous, image and sound! :) THANKS and good luck!
If you’ve got access to a VR headset and headphones, take a look from a very different angle: Vickers Machine Gun Shoot - VR headset / 360 degree video #MGC2022 ruclips.net/video/OurPcoW__4U/видео.html
What the devs really should do is give an extra subclass to the Machine Gunner where they have a kit to build an MMG or HMG. They did this with the anti tank class where they can build an Anti-tank gun using a 50 unit supply crate. Most machine gunners only have 2 subclasses that you can max out by level 3. Having the MG class get an HMG subclass with an HMG kit costing 25-50 supplies I think would really complement the class. The AT gun currently uses 5 munitions units per shot so it eats into the entire teams munitions resource pool. An HMG like the Vickers could eat 1 munitions unit per 25 rounds (don't ask me whether that's balanced, I'm not a dev, just theory crafting here), so your team can help sustain the HMG by building munitions nodes. It could also be a 2 man crew like the AT guns, No. 1 to fire the gun, No. 2 to cut reloading time in half. Maybe have all HMGS on a mounted tripod so it can shoot over barricades and lvl 1-2 bunkers made by the engineer class.
buildable HMGs were in the works by the previous devs, they'll probably be added someday, tough I wouldn't count on using team ammunitions for ammo, only 50 supplies like the AT gun to be built.
We can 3D render them too! Something we’re exploring more of as part of the virtual tour and digitisation of the collection to make it more accessible. my.mpskin.com/en/tour/1bmwzehzh
HLL needs to add a HMG squad. Three to four spots: Officer(or whatever the equivalent would be), Gunner, Ammo Carrier, Ammo Carrier. Gunner can place the HMG and everyone can build it. Ammo Carriers carry ammo and supplies to build the HMG, albeit a smaller amount of supplies so the support class is still relevant. Then we can have the Vickers, Browning, and MG-42 emplacements.
For a real Vickers detachment, the No 1 places the tripod and the No 2 carries the gun - that would create real teamwork! No ammunition until the No 3 comes up and water with the No 4. This would be a nice variation with other countries too possibly.
Bren absolutely lovely. By the time I joined the regular Army we had the GPMG. What a load of Schmit. I hated the sprung loaded carrying handle as it jarred my arm because you could not compensate for its movement. The SLR was 2nd rate and I got into the Schmit for asking for an AK47. I had the opportunity to use a Lee Enfield mark 5 in Australia WOW!!! (NO NOT a Carbine)
The 303 Bren and 762 Bren are both excellent! We’ll share what we think of the SLR as we develop the collection - there are some big fans out there though!
The Bren was the best LMG in the British Army i first fired this when i was 14 in the Army Cadets along with the Lee Enfield .303 then again in the TA and Regular Army god i miss them days and I'm only 59
In the 80s I was both an L4 (7.62 Bren) gunner and a GPMG gunner on several occasions. In some ways I preferred the L4, particularly in boat work. So damned reliable.
My dad had a permenant scar on his finger from a cocking lever hitting it....somewhere at home I ha e a newspaper photo of him behind a twin barreled nordenfeldt .also one of him at twenty one as #1 winning lord somebody or others cup , probably at Winchester ,With the KRRC
You’d be hitting every target! Rich doesn’t target shoot but can get 45+ out of 50 on one of competition shoots with the Bren as it’s so easy to be an accurate weapon when fired from the bipod.
Three advantages the Bren had over the MG34 and MG42: 1. Tactical maneuverability. The German guns chewed up so much ammo the riflemen were ammo carriers and worked to support the gun. Being lighter and more versatile, the Bren meant the Commonwealth sections had greater flexibility than the German squad. 2. The Bren was ideal for jungle operations. If the British had gone for an equivalent of the MG34 or MG42, jungle operations would have been very different. 3. Accuracy. The MG34 and MG42 while having ferocious rates of fire were area denial and suppression weapons. The Bren with rifle like accuracy could call down fire on an individual man. In section attacks and platoon level assaults this was essential. The Vickers HMG performed the suppression and area denial role in Commonwealth doctrine and was well suited to this role as a water cooled weapon that didn't need barrel changes.
Yes and no to a lot. Tactically both weapons were used the same and carried the same amount of ammunition in the section with a similar practical rate of fire. They also weighed the same. From a jungle perspective, the M60 (as a belt-fed weapon in Vietnam) performed well in the jungle environment, as did the L7 GPMG in British service in jungles. The small 'drums' for the belt-fed weapons operated like magazines so the problem of belt-drag was quickly overcome. Accuracy? yes the Bren was more accurate to hold on the target but the German argument was that 25 rounds per second hit the spot before the gun veered off. Rich is currently writing a paper on the Bren versus the MG42 as part of the equipment-centric capability analysis he's working on. It'll be published in the next few months and draw out many more arguments about which was best, including training, infrastructure and logistics, all of which were the Bren's true strong points that made it a battle-winning capability.
1. I think it was rather due to the fact that german infantry unit was centered around their MG. Which quite frankly is not a bad idea when you compare what 1 MG can do compared to even a bunch of bolt action rifles. And enemy usually doesn't like to go against MG for the very same reason. Thus as long as you can feed and fire your MG you can at worse fairly hold the area even if majority of your men were wiped out.
As was the British section, based around the Bren that is. The section level tactics, ammunition amounts, practical rates of fire and ability to prolong a firefight are all very very similar. Bren rate of fire, 112 rounds per minute; German? 150-180 (light role). Amount of rounds carried by the section: British was 1,000 rounds (1944 Infantry Training pamphlet at vickersmg.blog/manual/infantry-training/) and German was 1,150 (from www.battleorder.org/1944-schutzenkompanie).
I believe that the Bren was very good at taking out German MG34/42s, as it was very obvious where a MG was set up and being fed. Attackers just had to worry about the MG position and less about the rest of the enemy section. The Bren just had to find a position to take the MG position out, and once found the Bren's accuracy came into its own. Taking few shots to hit was harder to spot. It might also be in any shooting position the section was holding. All the section's riflemen were also expected to get stuck in so adding to the difficulty in identifying where the Ben was. Very different section tactical use. For Platoon firepower there was the Vickers to supplement the Bren with added sustained fire, which it could do all day and night. Interestingly the modern British Army with their Sharpshooter's Rifles are reverting back to Bren section tactics. Well Bren accuracy to get hits on the enemy rather than the spay and prey.
@@vickersmg I remember reading part of the after-action report on Long Tan by major Smith, OC D-Coy. Highlights from memory: Owen SMG: useless. M16: performed OK, as expected. SLR L1: the workhorse. M60: very problematic. Largely (if not only) due to belts dragging through mud. They had little choice but to use the M60 in Vietnam at that stage. The L4 and L7 were not introduced into the NZ army until the seventies, for as far as I know. Edit: I just came across two photos of Australian soldiers with L4A4s from 1965 in Borneo, so they would have been available.
Glad you like it. We’ll hopefully put more of the same out in the next few weeks. We can’t monetise this content so please support us if you can www.patreon.com/VickersMG.
Excellent. Finally... someone else with some knowledge of WW2 small arms and in particularly the Lewis and Bren, and job well done to the formal presentation. HLL can keep the Lewis as the entry level MG, but then add the Bren with the 30rd mags at level 3, and then the Bren with the 100rd drums at level 6. As it stand, HLL completely missed the mark when allowing the Bren to be used as the US BAR, ESPECIALLY when paired with the satchel! LoL! Also, HLL should also allow the BAR to have its bipod deployed in the MG roll as well. The Bren was the best LMG of WW2 and as it stands it can't even be deployed in the LMG role. Grrrr.
What would be the difference between the Lewis and the Bren? Can the weight slow you down more? Are stoppages and overheating built into the game randomly? The 100 round drums would slow you down again though with weight. We understand game play has to balance the accuracy but there might be other ways of setting levels, such as just upping the accuracy of a gun with greater experience, or even be able to use it as part of a team in the fixed line role for defence.
@@vickersmg The biggest issue is that HLL does not allow for the Bren to deploy its bipod, instead they model the Bren like they do the US BAR. HLL has the Bren perform as an "automatic rifle" being fired from the shoulder (and yet restrict the Soviet DP-27 to being used on the bi-pod or the hip and not from the shoulder). The Lewis gun, and the 1914 Enfield, and the Lanchester SMG were all a waste of the dev's time and resources. For the entry level kits they should have used SMLE Mk III, the "Tommy" gun, and the Bren in MG role (the Bren can later use the 50 or 100rd drums). HLL does not model weight, stoppage, barrel heat, or any of the other factors that would normally be taken in to consideration. HLL's ultimate sin is to build faction squads with kit load outs that are equal to each other. You'll find that the Germans squads have StG44's and G43's galore, no pazerfausts, and the Panzerschreck only carries two rounds yet has pinpoint accuracy (of note, in HLL the MG34 used 50rd drums and the MG42 uses 100rd drums). The balancing act includes armor, they literally modeled the Firefly tank to have the same armor value as the Tiger and Panther. They've put the US 76mm main gun on par with the afor mentioned 3 main guns (as "heavy tanks") yet put the Panzer IV's 7.5 cm KwK 40 L/43-48 main gun in the same groups as the US 75mm and Soviet 76mm main gun of which there was no comparison in terms of armor piercing. Another sad thing is all "heavy" heavy tanks have the same armor, gun, and speed abilities, as does the "medium" tanks (Sherman M4, Cromwell, and T34). All in the name of "balance". Toss in using player controlled 105mm artillery (too close to troops, there should be mortars instead), and bombing runs by heavy bombers (B17's would never drop ordnance within a stone's throw of their own troops), these types of things make guys like me shake our heads.
We don’t know about game design but we do know about balancing different aspects of capability and it’s a challenging task. There are always losers with compromise.
I was trained to fire the LMG ( Bren) from the hip….. we loaded with tracer every 4 th round….quite easy changing mags too from your own pouch. We walked firing too never ran unless you pulled up carrying handle….. as you said very accurate weapon….
CQB fire by bounds is an interesting one to have a drill for - much better from the prone but at least it meant the Bren gunner could get stuck in for house clearing!
I'm surprised you didn't mention the Vickers K gun. Which, according to one source online, saw service atop the extendable ladders borrowed from London Fire Brigade with the American Rangers who attacked Pointe du Hoc on D-Day.
That source might have been us! We’re doing a special bonus on the role of the K but in the meantime watch our old one: US Rangers using the Vickers Gas-Operated (Class K) Gun ruclips.net/video/my3-vdrgJro/видео.html
@@vickersmg you might well be the original source but I saw it on the American Rifleman after a certain YT channel said the Rangers used the very similar Lewis gun on their D-Day coverage this year. The picture shown didn't look like a Lewis gun to me. I'll be checking out your video soon.
One thing you don't see in HLL (or any video game, really) is the fact that in WWII the machine gun was king, and the machine gun was the firepower of the squad with the other weapons there pretty much to protect and support it. One MG can spew out far more firepower than multiple riflemen, especially if they're using bolt actions, but needs protection from flank and rear attacks.
All major powers used their LMGs in that way so it would be interesting to see how 50% of the LMG’s ammunition could be carried by the other men in the section.
We're currently doing some deep dive research into the Bren and the doctrine shows that we used the Bren in the same way - "The rifle is the personal weapon of the indvidual. It will be needed to augment the fire of the L.M.G. when required in an emergency, for local protection, and especially for "sniping" single enemy." The BRITISH Small Arms Training pamphlet No 4 for the Bren, 1942: archive.org/details/1942-uk-sat-1-pam-4/page/n19/mode/2up
I think it was 12 Canadians in Hong Kong in December 1941, cleared the cemetery in Port Stanley of the Japanese. As they ran they cleared the cemetery firing from the hip. When they reached the buildings at the top, successfully driving the Japanese out of the cemetery, forced were forced to fall back to the lower side of the cemetery as I believe there was only 2 of them left.
Glad you enjoyed it! The Bren is a great LMG and would be a super designated marksman rifle as well. It's very impressive at doing things the Vickers wasn't designed to do.
I always thought the Lewis with the round magazine was a good idea for fixed positions where you can get at extra mags easily. Plenty of ammo and no messing with belts.
The challenge was overheating due to the aircooling. It couldn't support the sustained fire needed for true machine gunnery so the Vickers had that role and kept it strongly until the 1960s.
@@vickersmg Strensall Barracks 1963. How to get rid of 5 million rounds of 303: Get a Vickers go to the range and start shooting. For an entire week. Afterwards the gun was still within spec. Can you imagine the size of the pile of spent brass? Was it possible to convert a Vickers to fire 7.62 x 51 from a disintegrating link belt?
A tale from ‘Pride of the Emma Gees’ (vickersmg.blog/product/the-vickers-machine-gun-pride-of-the-emma-gees/) and apparently it was six million according to the chap who witnessed it as he corrected us afterwards. Yes, the Vickers was used by the South Africans in 7.62x51 right up until the 1980s. It used disintegrating link but needed a special type.
Hi Richard, why did the bren have stainless steel from the gasport to the muzzle? Because of the aggressive cordit, or to simplify production? Greetings from Germany
The front stainless steel part was designed to be a wear part and replaceable in Mk I, but since the whole barrel is quick detachable in Mk II and onwards the stainless steel part was eliminated.
The whole barrel is detachable on the Mark 1 as well. We're not aware of any British consideration of the flash eliminator only being changed or spares carried of it in the gun group (based on printed manuals).
Excellent! Thanks for saying so. We can’t monetise this content and we do rely on donations so if you can please pop across to vickersmg.blog/about/support/ and pick a way of helping us out - even help fund an MG42 for the collection!
Personal anecdote incoming. My grandad was in the Royal Engineers and found himself in the Black Forest at the end of the war. Wanting to supplement their rations with some actual meat, he went hunting boar with a Bren.
I wonder if it could be a new class in HLL called 'Heavy Machine Gun' where you have 2 or maybe even 3 guys in the squad, one the gun operator and the other one (or two) carrying extra machine gun rounds/boxes and scouting capabilities (binoculars). This class type has access to bigger automatic machine guns for example the Vickers K seen in the video.
There's lots of scope for it to be included. Maybe the Vickers K (check out our short video released yesterday) but that could be an upgrade for the Bren for special missions.
It was actually withdrawn from the British army for being to acurate. We moved over to the GPMG as it proved to be an effective area suppressing weapon with a better rate of fire and multirolled use.
It wasn’t withdrawn completely until 2002 and stayed on alongside GPMG for many years. It was much more suited to roles where a No 2 couldn’t be in close proximity or where belt-feed caused problems. A superbly accurate gun that can game the scoring system for most shoots very easily by either keeping it on repetition for automatic shoots or using automatic for ‘number of rounds on target’ shoots.
As a happy ex-user of the 7.62 L4 version, I'd suggest no, not as easily, there's a bit too much metal to keep in the air unless you are a rather well built and muscled person (and I am definitely not that!). 🙂
it’s definately possible, you can shoulder fire PKMs, GPMGs and SAWs albeit not accurately. I’d wager i’d be able to fire the Bren from the shoulder a lot more accurately than those 3. So yes as long as you aren’t built like a human noodle.
Ive fired BREN and GPMG from the shoulder on CQB ranges in the 80s . It used to be taught. Its not "easy" but managable with practice. You have to let the barrel down between bursts due to the weapons weight.
Because it shouldn’t be used for that! It places too much strain on a part not designed for it and we’ve seen one break while in use but thankfully not firing. The correct place to hold is the bipod legs. There are photos of it being fired by the barrel carrying handle but there are always photos of things that shouldn’t happen.
Depends on the rate of fire. If you’re doing a big task, with lots of belts prepped, you’d be firing at a slower rate of fire which may not even boil the water.
@@vickersmg yer like it they were set up and just doing stitches? wave after wave just stitch em? or how do you mean? or you mean in real life, they dont just keep running to the slaughter? so its in bursts or?
Machine guns would be set up further back where they could manage their fire and be protected by infantry if they were doing any planned shoot. If they were defensive in the front line then they’d be in the wrong place! It did happen (and many a gallantry award was received as a result) but the guns often then overheated or ran out of ammunition.
There's a handed down story about the BREN that during trials it was considered, like the Lewis gun, as a weapon for use in air to air fighting. To try it out a BREN was set up in a fixed jig 200 yards from a canvas target. All the big wigs from the Air Ministry and RAF gathered round to watch the test, the range officer pulled the cord attached to the trigger and fired off a full magazine. All the brass gathered at the target to find that there was one single hole in it, not quite in the centre but pretty close. The concensus was that only one bullet had hit the target so they said thanks very much but no thanks and left. The range officer was puzzled, so he checked the mounting of the jig to see if it hadn't moved. He checked the sightline of the BREN to make sure it was on target, it was. He then walked down to the target and, still puzzled, he examined it again. Frustrated he put his hands in his pockets and found a live .303 round and offered it up to the hole in the target. He said words to the effect of "Blow me down" as he saw that the hole was slightly bigger than the round and that every bullet from the BREN had gone through it! The big wigs turned down the gun because of its, perceived, inaccuracy but more importantly it was magazine fed, not belt fed. The range officer contacted the Enfield factory to tell them what he had found about the gun's accuracy and recommended that they flog it to the army after making a minor adjustment to give it a slightly larger cone of fire.
Well that's a new one on us! We have the full trials reports for the Bren included in our uploads of the Small Arms Committee Minutes as we're pretty sure it's not in there (and it would have been!). The lack of large capacity magazine and the rate of fire would have made it very unsuitable as an aircraft gun at that point in time. The full index of minutes is available for anyone to view: www.patreon.com/posts/small-arms-and-40900032 and subscribe if you want to read the reports.
Great video! Was the mobile Vickers K used more in combat in ww2 than the Lewis gun? I know from your videos it was used by the commandos in the invasion of Normandy and was used in Operation Infatuate and for the assault at Walcheren.
The Lewis accounts for at least one VC action (I'd have to check my recent Armax paper to remember exactly what that was) so it was used in combat but not with the infantry. The Vickers GO / K was an assault weapon only used by the Commandos so not with the line infantry either. It was very much the Bren as the widespread LMG.
That sounds about right. I’ve written a whole paper on the use of small arms on VC actions but I can’t remember the dataset. I’ll have to upload it all at some point!
There is some evidence that the Lewis gun shot down more enemy aircraft than any of the other AA weapons available to British forces including 3.5inch, 20mm Oerlikon, 40mm Bofors, 40mm Pom Pom, 4.5 inch etc.... Primarily this was due to its ubiquity when British forces faced enemy aircraft the most...
@@vickersmg Yes I think it was on single shot and probably for a good reason!, It was bloody loud I think it would of been around 1993 before we would of worn ear protection maybe I can't remember.
It’s quite interesting how the specific use has become very generalised though and a lot of people think that it’s just the way the Bren worked, but that defies physics really! I remember my first couple of years in cadets about that time when ear protection wasn’t too common.
@@vickersmg yes I struggle to remember although earlier on in the day I had shot the Lee Enfield and the SLR and I wasn't really up to shooting anything else after that 😄
Hopefully we’ll be adding an SLR into the collection soon, but we have a couple of other projects to complete first. Head over and check them out: vickersmg.blog/product-category/project-support/
We had a developer come and record our 16 gun shoot last July so we know the sound is out there and plenty of firearms dealers support that so it shouldn’t be difficult to get. We’ll licence our own audio too.
HLL thought it was a good idea to add the bren without the use of a bipod....wtf...also the bipod mechanic is broken to begin with so why they didnt fix it is beyond me, but "wE GoT fasTEr Run spEEd" ...what were they thinking?
We know nothing of the game itself so can’t comment on that but using the Bren without the bipod does limit it’s role and doesn’t reflect the doctrine of the day.
There are lots of shooting clubs around the country for rifle and shotgun shooting. The weapons we have, other than the rifles, are considered prohibited weapons and require special authority from the Home Office. We’ll be sharing a video about that in the next few weeks and it will explain more. Please do subscribe and turn on notifications to make sure you don’t miss it. Sign up to our patreon at www.patreon.com/VickersMG if you’d like to support us some more.
Was the 100 round pan ever considered for infantry use, even in static positions? Or was the Vickers just considered preferable in such scenarios and the 100 round variant too heavy for mobility?
For the rate of fire of the Bren, and the lack of sights that work with the drum fitted, the standard 30-round magazine was much more appropriate. The Vickers was chosen for its high rate of fire more than the magazine capacity.
@vickersmg I see (thanks for the reply), so in a real situation the two working in situ is ideal, gaining accuracy/flexibility with one and suppression with the other, which isn't a model easily adapted to uncoordinated squads in Hell Let Loose I suppose. One other question if you don't mind, in Hell Let Loose the sights are near unusable. Do you think they've been too literal in their interpretation and so not considered how the sights seemed in practice?
Sort the sling out properly and then the Bren is easier enough to fire from the hip. Heck, the same can be done with a GPMG. Sure not ideal, but controlled and accurate enough to be effective at reasonable ranges for patrolling and FIBUA. It is controllable and shots can be walked in. Once on target hold it there with single, double or short bursts. Carry one for a week and you soon learn.
Absolutely. The sling helps a lot and the later padded versions even better! It seems the game is using the Bren like that but expecting to be accurate out to 400 yards whereas the CQB stance is really 50 yards maximum.
@@vickersmg Set up the sling correctly, by winding the right arm around the back part of the sling and you can get a solid base. It kind of locks up and becomes enough for reasonable control to be effective out to 200m. Getting the sling the right length takes some faffing about until right. From seeming to do nothing it suddenly just sets in solid when right. That and the side grip and you almost have "Aliens 2" heavy weapons carry. Perfect for shooting from inside of buildings without getting near the window, and you can move rooms too fast enough so changing your fire position. I saw loads of machine gunners never learn that trick, because basically no one had shown them.
Interesting. We had one of the barrel handles snap during a demonstration once - thankfully not while firing - so it shows why they used the bipod legs to support rather than the carry handle.
@@vickersmg Soldiers can break anything. Don't get me wrong when possible, and static for any length of time, use the bipod. Interestingly our shooting team used the Bren foresight elements as the post were slimmer than general SLR issue. I only carried a Bren for a short while until issued a GPMG. That was a long time ago. The point of the collection is to retail knowledge for prosperity. Gun matches at Bisley were won by the Bren Teams over the GPMG's until the rules were changed. A good gunner could single tap with the rhythm of the gun to stay giving central hits and not wander off. With the Bren you could barely notice the difference to full auto. The GPMGs are noticeably faster, though can still be single tapped.. The first thing I was taught on the GPMG not in the user manual was to stamp on the cocking handle to clear a stuck cartridge jam. Anything goes to get them back into action. In truth I had few difficulties with either Bren or GPMG, they were both highly reliable.
Could u imagine storming trenches with 5 guys each carrying one clearing g out tranches ,one shoot then the other taking over while the other reload , Plus there not all pussey during ww2 they shot from the hip half the time , Half the time they were pushing forward the other half defending there Position
It's a shame that your visual re-creation of firing a Bren has the firer with his hand under the magazine. The used cases would be ejected downwards and the open action under the breech would slice up his hand after dropping hot bullet cases into his hand. Bad mistake!
Do you mean the game recreation? If so, that’s one of the things we comment on in the video. The clip of us firing with the close quarter battle drill has the firer holding the bipod, where he should be.
It might have been with some Territorial Army units still but for a very short period and unlikely first-line stuff. The Royal Artillery had them with the anti-aircraft batteries as well. There were also a lot of vehicle and boat mounted Lewis around, with the Royal Air Force too.
Only jeep mounted in North Africa and then used by the Army Commandos in North West Europe for specific operations rather than wide-spread use. Take a look at our overview video on the VGO: ruclips.net/video/OZnoh4KSros/видео.html
Yes, Lewis was an American and it was built by FN in Belgium. Bren started as the ZB in BRno, Czechoslovakia, and licensed to the Royal Small Arms Factory in ENfield, hence the name.
They’re classed as prohibited weapons and need authority from the Home Office. It’s a question we’re regularly asked so have produced a short video about it that will be shared in the next few weeks. Make sure you subscribe to find out more and consider supporting us on www.patreon.com/VickersMG if you’d like to help us fund the Association.
Many of the players are dissastisfied with their portrayal. What do you think of the guy holding the ejection port on the Bren? Would you be open to consulting the developer?
He’s going to get some very hot and bashed fingers doing so! It’s completely the wrong position to hold the gun when firing from the hip. We’d be very happy to work with any developers. We’re a not-for-profit with the object to get people informed about the history of things so this outreach has been great.
@@vickersmg If you were to turn this into a serious collaboration with Team17 it could boost your reach even further. The Dev/Publisher is British and based in wakefield. Theyve received lots of complaints and there's rumours of a rework. If you were to help them out youve got a good chance of securing a lot of good publicity.
Most Lewis and Savage guns ended up on RNPS trawlers, DEM Ships and bolted onto the bridges of colliers in the vain hope they could fend off a Ju87/88.
Yes, many did, and then landing craft of all ships. The recently shared photos of Churchill visiting the Normandy beaches just after Op OVERLORD show a nice Mark 3 or 4 Lewis in the background.
@@vickersmg my friends great uncle was crew on a collier and he showed us (when I was wee - long long time ago) a picture of him looking mean on his ship with his gun. I said something about it being a Lewis gun and he told me that it was a Savage Gun. I think these were just Lewis guns made under licence. They also had one of those odd potato digger machine guns. I’m not sure if their name, though. American again with a bizarre swinging arm thing under the barrel.
Probably because the Savage-made guns were stamped Savage in the top so that’s what he’d have seen. The ‘potato diggers’ were Colt guns from an 1895 design. They’re only other use was with the Canadian Expeditionary Force and we’ll do a little more on those in the future.
You can watch this vid to understand more about U.K. machine gun ownership: MGC2022 Planning the events Q&A #vickersmg ruclips.net/user/live1njLHKuOYIo?feature=share
Woah, the SOUND of all the Vickers at once!! 😮
That was from our 16 gun shoot last July. You can watch a full vid at The #MGC2022 16 Gun #VickersMG Shoot at Bisley
ruclips.net/video/lARgVokqQ48/видео.html. Make sure you subscribe too.
@@vickersmg…..and the K gun ? This was used by the LRDG possibly ?
A video for just that question: Hell Let Loose - What about the Vickers K?
ruclips.net/video/YEjBc_qe0Dc/видео.html
@@vickersmg Thanks….I spotted it shortly after I asked my question.
Except for: not being used by Nazis, not being built by slave labour, able to do this for hours without having to change barrels, not exploding because the bolts bounce and a few other things I’m sure.
Thanks Rich and team. It was great to see all that live firing, given that most of the world thinks that UK civilians have no means to own and fire private collections of historic machine guns.
Absolutely. A misunderstanding we try to correct as regularly as we can, with the spent brass to show for it!
As a long term firearms licence holder that is news to me, they had my pistols off me years back!
@@pcka12 My pistols went then too. First all the full bore ones, then a year later Labour came to power and out-nannied the Tories by banning the rimfire ones as well. That just left me with rifles and air weapons.
@@derekp2674 @pcka12 well we hold pistols as well. Yes, they're prohibited weapons but thankfully the right justifications mean we have sufficient good reason to possess them. We'll be putting together a short video on the legalities of possessing prohibited weapons in the UK this week so make sure you subscribe and check it out when it goes live. If you like what we need and want to contribute to that 'good reason' then become one of our patrons at www.patreon.com/vickersmg
@@vickersmg Thanks for the update. I'm sure I'm already subscribed in RUclips and I have already donated to your most recent appeal for funds. As I'm based fairly close to Swindon, I expect I'll be able to get along to one of your open days soon. I'm currently studying the recoil dynamics of rifle grenades, so if you have any relevant artefacts for that quest, I would be interested to see those too.
This video and the uploader's channel is really underrated, i love how you guys explain the most common questions of how the guns work in such short amount of time, 6 minutes and 1 second!
Thank you very much. That's kind of you to say so. Please do share and encourage people to subscribe.
Imagine being in a trench 2 or 3 hundred yards away from that lot and being told to "go over the top".
Horrible.
I remember the L4, which was the 7.62mm variant of the Bren, from my time in the TA. I never tried firing it standing up and only ever used it with the bipod. The main thing I remember was the insane accuracy which was mainly down to its long barrel.
A very accurate weapon that would probably fill the designated marksman role in the modern infantry very nicely!
My recollection is how loud it was. Two or three bursts from a prone position and i couldn't hear anything. Y
The days before hearing protection? We regularly fire inside buildings with them as part of our demonstrations and normal ear defenders work fine - it's the pressure wave that surprises most people.
@@vickersmg That's right, this was not on the range. Y
Then it’ll certainly made them ring!
That line of Vickers guns at the end sounded mighty impressive !
All part of an event we ran last year. The #MGC2022 16 Gun #VickersMG Shoot at Bisley
ruclips.net/video/lARgVokqQ48/видео.html
Nice to see someone using proper hand placement on the Bren, unlike so many Americans who talk about it who have got no idea where to put their left hands at all.
Great point. This is the safe way to do it: holding under the ejection cover is going to give you a bad day straight away and holding the barrel handle has the risk of it breaking (and we’ve seen it done but thankfully not while firing).
My father told me about his experience with the Lewis gun when he was a young soldier in WW2. As a DEMS gunner he did several trips on colliers running down the east coast through the straits of Dover. He travelled with a No.2. who had the ammo. They used to hope for a minor attack by a German plane , it gave them an excuse to ditch the remaining ammo and not have to lug it all back to barracks.
And hopefully more ammunition was available! DEMS used the most Lewis guns in the Second World War.
Okay, what’s a DEMS ?.
@@trappenweisseguy27 Defencibly Equipped Merchant Ship. . My father was in the Maritime Regiment of the Royal Artillery. Soldiers at sea. The unit casualties were very high, mostly fatal when ships were sunk.
An interesting part of the Royal Artillery very few are aware of!
Great video. You mentioned the Czech origins of the Bren, but I wish you would have mentioned the American origins of the Lewis.
Thanks again. Please keep these weapons and their history alive for the future.
Absolutely James. Merely a case of not balancing the information and not scripting it precisely either. We'll do more on the Lewis and its introduction in the coming months, albeit we bought it from the Belgians rather than the US. Remarkably it was trialed in the same round of machine gun trials as the Vickers in 1912.
All they was rig the bren to fire 303 ammo. British in what way.
British re-design, British build, British used the vast majority in service. Pedants, of which there seem to be a lot about, would say that the ZB was Czechoslovakian but the Bren was British.
The Lewis gun (or Lewis automatic machine gun or Lewis automatic rifle) is a First World War-era light machine gun. Designed privately in the United States though not adopted there, the design was finalized and mass-produced in the United Kingdom.
Don’t forget Belgium’s involvement in giving Lewis the initial production capacity after the US said no. We will do a full video on the Lewis at some point but couldn’t get all the information in this one.
Interesting listening to the different cyclic rates of the Vickers. I was fortunate enough to get to fire one of the last Vickers used in the NZ Army when I first joined. However, I really liked the BREN - used to fire single shot as though it was just a rifleman firing and then open up on auto when the time came. Just needed good trigger control. The GPMG killed them both off.
They just had different fusee spring tensions that adjusts the rate of fire slightly. You can balance two or three guns together quite easily but not possible on this one. The Bren drills you were using for single shot were exactly as described in the 1939 pamphlet!
@@vickersmg I was told by an "old Vickers gunner" that there were 22 different stoppages on the Vickers and you needed to know every one by heart so that your IA drills were second nature. I think he was one of the last in the Army left over from Korea - he looked old enough for that. I don't know if this is true - I ended up as a Coy Comdr so didn't get to fire the MG that much.
You might like this one: Stoppages and the Vickers Machine Gun
ruclips.net/video/MuAS_eMpRBc/видео.html
Great video as always Rich ✨
Cheers Robbie. Very much Adam B-H quality on this one. I’m just the talking head!
Great stuff guys!
Thanks Jonathan. Praise indeed. Send the gaming community here when you need a break and we'll have a cardboard cutout some time soon ;o) No one seems to want to tackle the intricacies of MMGs in a gaming scenario though.
It was actually used by Australian militia battalions (infantry) in Papua New Guinea during the early Kokoda Campaign of 1942, along with the Bren - militia units such as the 38th Battalion bring certainly second rate in equipment and training compared to the veteran units of the 2nd AIF
Yes, we've read that reading the Vickers too, with the AMF units getting much older examples and the regulars having new guns from Lithgow.
Just imagine that you are a german charging british trench and suddenly you hear 5:45 . I can imagine that only 2 or 3 of those Vickers machine guns could be amazingly effective at suppressing the enemy...
A terrifying thought! It was an incredible feeling to stand behind them as all 16 were firing. The energy was intense.
That’s exactly what Japanese soldiers walked into at the Battle of Imphal in a gully and their commander kept sending more up to be cut down by the defenders
@@davidknight1119 Gotta love the scene from The last samurai when they brought up the gatlings… The movie is inspired by the battle of Shiroyama if I’m not mistaken
That's interesting. We're compiling accounts of Vickers MG use in the Far East for a future project and hadn't heard that one.
We’re not sure ‘love’ is the right word to use there but we know the scene you mean.
Captain Hurricane always fired the Bren from the hip.
Ooof! Superhuman strength helps that.
My grandad was a bren and Vickers gunner in WW2. 1st Battalion 22nd Cheshire Reg... Always remember him telling me "a tip" give the butt a little tap to spread the bullets out...not sure that was much use to a 10 year old...but I remember it still... I miss my grandad, and that generation as a whole 😢
That’s great! My grandad was 7th Bn Cheshires and one of the first things he told me at about the same age was the 2-inch tap! It’s officially called the ‘consistency of tap’ and if you watch the full live-streamed vid of the July 2022 shoot we demonstrate it as well. It was useful to me as I bought the first Vickers aged 12 (a deac) and it’s all gone from there. - Rich
Man,HLL got the Bren so wrong! 😢 who could possibly ADS while running?! That thing is huge, the bipod is half it’s designed use
Took me a while to find out what ADS means but yes, it’s not really possibly to aim down the sights while running.
My guess is the Brits didn't really have anything that compares directly to the BAR, so they filled the gap with the Bren.
Not sure many countries had an automatic rifle the same as the BAR, which is arguably forced into an LMG role as the Browning M1919 is an MMG when on the tripod and only an LMG in the A6 role.
@@kilroy2517 Other way round. The Yanks had nothing like the Bren and tried to fill the gap with the BAR.
@@zoiders I'm talking about the game. You know, what this video is about?
A vickers squad would be an awesome addition
It would be great to see! If you want to know more about the roles then head to our website: vickersmg.blog/in-use/transport/man-carrying-the-mmg/
Wow that massed Vickers firing at the end was amazing. I know they probably would not have been deployed that close together. But still ...
Normally 25-yards apart for each gun but they could easily be firing on a target with a small frontage like this. Devastating effect!
The cool thing with the Vickers was that it could, and at least in WW1, frequently was, be used as an indirect fire weapon. You could cover an area of ground with indirect fire MMG rounds, denying the enemy passage through that area.
A tactic developed in the First World War but definitely expanded on in the Second World War with the introducing of the dial sight and Mark 8z ammunition extending the range to 4,500 yards. Nearly 100 Vickers with the Australians at El Alamein firing on the same plan and the late-war ‘pepperpots’ saw them used alongside artillery and even tanks for indirect fire.
@@vickersmgThey did a similar thing in '82 down south with the GPMG
Something we’ll have to read up about Mark - thanks! There was certainly a resurgence of training for sustained fire machine gunnery post-82.
the vickers should definitely be a deployable structure similar to how AT guns are currently placed in game, with a new loadout for MG that allows them to build it
I'm sure that can work somehow.
I think a specific squad should be created. An sl with his OP and all if the support players similar to a recon squad
We just replied to your other message to but check out the roles of the original teams - interesting to think how this could work: vickersmg.blog/in-use/transport/man-carrying-the-mmg/
In 1944 during the campaign in the lowlands one of the sergeants in the 52 recon (the fighting fifty second reece Lowland Division) was commended for his ability to us the bren like a sniper rifle on single shot on one occasion movement was noted in a ditch the only part of the enemy showing was his backside which he put a round through the victim was a German officer who while getting treatment for his wound complimented him on his shooting.
For ranges less than 400yds, it's a great stable weapon to fire from. Take a look at the 'Sniper Bren' video we did a couple of years ago. ruclips.net/video/mF986OB11o4/видео.html
Yes! Deployable Heavy MGs please!
Plenty of interesting ways to build that in: multi-player teams, barrel changes when the No 2 is close enough, more ammunition from across the platoon; greater range when firing from the tripod and upgrades to Mark 8z ammunition to give up to 4500 yards range on the Vickers. Perhaps even incorporate them into the use of the Universal carrier. Plenty of scope.
@@vickersmg I am PRAYING for mortars to be added
It would be a lot of the same coding as indirect fire for artillery and machine guns.
Lewis looks like pain in the arse to operate anywhere
Absolutely! It needs a lot of strength to throw about.
man the Vickers sounds absolutely menacing
It does! Did you watch the whole video? The #MGC2022 16 Gun #VickersMG Shoot at Bisley
ruclips.net/video/lARgVokqQ48/видео.html
Great video , superb collection of history & great to see them out and putting copper & lead across the paddock. ✅
What brand and grain of.303 ammunition are you using ?
We use PPU 174gr as it’s the most readily available for us that functions in MGs properly.
Obviously this would require a lot of ball and tracer to pull off but one day I would like to see just how hard you could lean on a Bren for sustained fire before encountering a stoppage that can't be remedied at the gas regulator. I've never heard stories of them choking while fighting in defence.
It would have to be a breakage I think, which would beg the question as to how worn the parts are in the first place. Nothing is new enough to make that good research sadly.
@@vickersmg A fairly recent Indian production gun might do.
Very true.
Brens came with a spare barrel, so it could be changed after 10 magazines of sustained fire. An advancing section would barely have enough ammunition to need it.
@@ethelminiA section would be carrying at least 2 spare mags per rifleman or more if needed. That's as many as 9 riflemen with 18 mags. That is not counting what the gunner carried or the cases of mags carried in the universal carriers or the sections Bedford. Brens were most certainly used fighting in defence as well with transit cases of magazines to hand 4:47 .
Bren is my favorite weapon so far in HLL..its ability to single fire easily and go full auto when needed makes it godlike!
Interesting. Many would agree in real life as well.
@@vickersmg US Army Infantryman here, maybe that's why lol
Good to hear!
Great video. A small question though: is there a Vickers GO No.2 Mk.1 Land Service in your collection and can you showcase footage of it? Thank you.
No, we don’t have a No 2 Mk 1 currently. We will be adapting one of our No 1 Mk 1 guns at some point as there aren’t any permanent modifications to fit.
@@vickersmg So were there "conversion kits" for aircraft guns or is this a build based on the Land Service model?
The basic gun is exactly the same and they could easily have components interchangeable between them. The No 2 Mk I used by Commandos was a ‘B’ variant as the ‘A’ was actually an RAF land service gun used for local airfield defence.
@@vickersmg Thank you for the insightful reply
This is one of our manuals that shows more about the different types of guns. The bipod mounting isn’t covered as that comes later but this is the ‘A’ variant. archive.org/details/1938ukap1641bwithamds/page/n27/mode/1up
I am not British by any means, but I am happy that in GB there are passionate people like You all, preserving their firearms traditions!
(even if the laws are no joke)
Your shooting videos are marvelous, image and sound! :) THANKS and good luck!
Glad you find the videos interesting and our Association worthwhile.
Right lads, over the top and march into that hail of bullets!
WW1 was off the wall nuts.
If you’ve got access to a VR headset and headphones, take a look from a very different angle: Vickers Machine Gun Shoot - VR headset / 360 degree video #MGC2022
ruclips.net/video/OurPcoW__4U/видео.html
What the devs really should do is give an extra subclass to the Machine Gunner where they have a kit to build an MMG or HMG. They did this with the anti tank class where they can build an Anti-tank gun using a 50 unit supply crate. Most machine gunners only have 2 subclasses that you can max out by level 3. Having the MG class get an HMG subclass with an HMG kit costing 25-50 supplies I think would really complement the class. The AT gun currently uses 5 munitions units per shot so it eats into the entire teams munitions resource pool. An HMG like the Vickers could eat 1 munitions unit per 25 rounds (don't ask me whether that's balanced, I'm not a dev, just theory crafting here), so your team can help sustain the HMG by building munitions nodes. It could also be a 2 man crew like the AT guns, No. 1 to fire the gun, No. 2 to cut reloading time in half. Maybe have all HMGS on a mounted tripod so it can shoot over barricades and lvl 1-2 bunkers made by the engineer class.
There’s a lot of thought in that! I’m sure there’s a way of making it work.
buildable HMGs were in the works by the previous devs, they'll probably be added someday, tough I wouldn't count on using team ammunitions for ammo, only 50 supplies like the AT gun to be built.
It would be good to incorporate the teamwork requirement to make it a playable aspect like an infantry section.
A Lewis, Bren & Vickers, all for real and not 3D rendered. Amazing
We can 3D render them too! Something we’re exploring more of as part of the virtual tour and digitisation of the collection to make it more accessible. my.mpskin.com/en/tour/1bmwzehzh
@@vickersmg Do you provide YT membership? Can't see the Join link?
We do now! Thanks for mentioning it - it's kicked us into action!
@@vickersmg I'll start paying a few quid on the 17th, as this channel is well worth supporting.
@@philbosworth3789 That will be super! Thank you so much!
HLL needs to add a HMG squad. Three to four spots: Officer(or whatever the equivalent would be), Gunner, Ammo Carrier, Ammo Carrier. Gunner can place the HMG and everyone can build it. Ammo Carriers carry ammo and supplies to build the HMG, albeit a smaller amount of supplies so the support class is still relevant. Then we can have the Vickers, Browning, and MG-42 emplacements.
For a real Vickers detachment, the No 1 places the tripod and the No 2 carries the gun - that would create real teamwork! No ammunition until the No 3 comes up and water with the No 4. This would be a nice variation with other countries too possibly.
Bren absolutely lovely. By the time I joined the regular Army we had the GPMG. What a load of Schmit. I hated the sprung loaded carrying handle as it jarred my arm because you could not compensate for its movement. The SLR was 2nd rate and I got into the Schmit for asking for an AK47. I had the opportunity to use a Lee Enfield mark 5 in Australia WOW!!! (NO NOT a Carbine)
Well we have the 7.62 Bren and it’s great. We’re hoping to acquire an SLR in the next month or two.
@@vickersmg I have never used a 7.62 Bren only the .303. If you manage to get hold of an SLR the rubbish bin is a good place to put it in.
The 303 Bren and 762 Bren are both excellent! We’ll share what we think of the SLR as we develop the collection - there are some big fans out there though!
The Bren was the best LMG in the British Army i first fired this when i was 14 in the Army Cadets along with the Lee Enfield .303 then again in the TA and Regular Army god i miss them days and I'm only 59
We fire the 7.62 Bren as part of our visits, albeit blank, so come and see us if you’d like to: vickersmg.blog/visits/
In the 80s I was both an L4 (7.62 Bren) gunner and a GPMG gunner on several occasions. In some ways I preferred the L4, particularly in boat work. So damned reliable.
We have one of the Indian-made Brens in our collection (from 1969). A great reliable piece: ruclips.net/video/hP_vJjmoPsU/видео.html
My God being down range of those vickers would put a serious strain on the regimental laundry. Lol
Being behind them was bad enough! Have you watched the full video yet?
My dad had a permenant scar on his finger from a cocking lever hitting it....somewhere at home I ha e a newspaper photo of him behind a twin barreled nordenfeldt .also one of him at twenty one as #1 winning lord somebody or others cup , probably at Winchester ,With the KRRC
That’s really interesting. You do have to keep your fingers out of the way! When was he in the KRRC?
Oh if only I could actually use the Bren's bipod in HLL.
You’d be hitting every target! Rich doesn’t target shoot but can get 45+ out of 50 on one of competition shoots with the Bren as it’s so easy to be an accurate weapon when fired from the bipod.
Three advantages the Bren had over the MG34 and MG42:
1. Tactical maneuverability. The German guns chewed up so much ammo the riflemen were ammo carriers and worked to support the gun. Being lighter and more versatile, the Bren meant the Commonwealth sections had greater flexibility than the German squad.
2. The Bren was ideal for jungle operations. If the British had gone for an equivalent of the MG34 or MG42, jungle operations would have been very different.
3. Accuracy. The MG34 and MG42 while having ferocious rates of fire were area denial and suppression weapons. The Bren with rifle like accuracy could call down fire on an individual man. In section attacks and platoon level assaults this was essential. The Vickers HMG performed the suppression and area denial role in Commonwealth doctrine and was well suited to this role as a water cooled weapon that didn't need barrel changes.
Yes and no to a lot. Tactically both weapons were used the same and carried the same amount of ammunition in the section with a similar practical rate of fire. They also weighed the same. From a jungle perspective, the M60 (as a belt-fed weapon in Vietnam) performed well in the jungle environment, as did the L7 GPMG in British service in jungles. The small 'drums' for the belt-fed weapons operated like magazines so the problem of belt-drag was quickly overcome. Accuracy? yes the Bren was more accurate to hold on the target but the German argument was that 25 rounds per second hit the spot before the gun veered off.
Rich is currently writing a paper on the Bren versus the MG42 as part of the equipment-centric capability analysis he's working on. It'll be published in the next few months and draw out many more arguments about which was best, including training, infrastructure and logistics, all of which were the Bren's true strong points that made it a battle-winning capability.
1. I think it was rather due to the fact that german infantry unit was centered around their MG. Which quite frankly is not a bad idea when you compare what 1 MG can do compared to even a bunch of bolt action rifles. And enemy usually doesn't like to go against MG for the very same reason. Thus as long as you can feed and fire your MG you can at worse fairly hold the area even if majority of your men were wiped out.
As was the British section, based around the Bren that is. The section level tactics, ammunition amounts, practical rates of fire and ability to prolong a firefight are all very very similar. Bren rate of fire, 112 rounds per minute; German? 150-180 (light role). Amount of rounds carried by the section: British was 1,000 rounds (1944 Infantry Training pamphlet at vickersmg.blog/manual/infantry-training/) and German was 1,150 (from www.battleorder.org/1944-schutzenkompanie).
I believe that the Bren was very good at taking out German MG34/42s, as it was very obvious where a MG was set up and being fed. Attackers just had to worry about the MG position and less about the rest of the enemy section. The Bren just had to find a position to take the MG position out, and once found the Bren's accuracy came into its own. Taking few shots to hit was harder to spot. It might also be in any shooting position the section was holding. All the section's riflemen were also expected to get stuck in so adding to the difficulty in identifying where the Ben was. Very different section tactical use.
For Platoon firepower there was the Vickers to supplement the Bren with added sustained fire, which it could do all day and night.
Interestingly the modern British Army with their Sharpshooter's Rifles are reverting back to Bren section tactics. Well Bren accuracy to get hits on the enemy rather than the spay and prey.
@@vickersmg I remember reading part of the after-action report on Long Tan by major Smith, OC D-Coy. Highlights from memory:
Owen SMG: useless.
M16: performed OK, as expected.
SLR L1: the workhorse.
M60: very problematic. Largely (if not only) due to belts dragging through mud.
They had little choice but to use the M60 in Vietnam at that stage. The L4 and L7 were not introduced into the NZ army until the seventies, for as far as I know.
Edit: I just came across two photos of Australian soldiers with L4A4s from 1965 in Borneo, so they would have been available.
This is sick!!! Thank you so much!!
Glad you like it. We’ll hopefully put more of the same out in the next few weeks. We can’t monetise this content so please support us if you can www.patreon.com/VickersMG.
You’re allowed if you subscribe, like and share ;-)
Excellent. Finally... someone else with some knowledge of WW2 small arms and in particularly the Lewis and Bren, and job well done to the formal presentation. HLL can keep the Lewis as the entry level MG, but then add the Bren with the 30rd mags at level 3, and then the Bren with the 100rd drums at level 6. As it stand, HLL completely missed the mark when allowing the Bren to be used as the US BAR, ESPECIALLY when paired with the satchel! LoL! Also, HLL should also allow the BAR to have its bipod deployed in the MG roll as well. The Bren was the best LMG of WW2 and as it stands it can't even be deployed in the LMG role. Grrrr.
What would be the difference between the Lewis and the Bren? Can the weight slow you down more? Are stoppages and overheating built into the game randomly? The 100 round drums would slow you down again though with weight. We understand game play has to balance the accuracy but there might be other ways of setting levels, such as just upping the accuracy of a gun with greater experience, or even be able to use it as part of a team in the fixed line role for defence.
@@vickersmg The biggest issue is that HLL does not allow for the Bren to deploy its bipod, instead they model the Bren like they do the US BAR. HLL has the Bren perform as an "automatic rifle" being fired from the shoulder (and yet restrict the Soviet DP-27 to being used on the bi-pod or the hip and not from the shoulder). The Lewis gun, and the 1914 Enfield, and the Lanchester SMG were all a waste of the dev's time and resources. For the entry level kits they should have used SMLE Mk III, the "Tommy" gun, and the Bren in MG role (the Bren can later use the 50 or 100rd drums). HLL does not model weight, stoppage, barrel heat, or any of the other factors that would normally be taken in to consideration. HLL's ultimate sin is to build faction squads with kit load outs that are equal to each other. You'll find that the Germans squads have StG44's and G43's galore, no pazerfausts, and the Panzerschreck only carries two rounds yet has pinpoint accuracy (of note, in HLL the MG34 used 50rd drums and the MG42 uses 100rd drums). The balancing act includes armor, they literally modeled the Firefly tank to have the same armor value as the Tiger and Panther. They've put the US 76mm main gun on par with the afor mentioned 3 main guns (as "heavy tanks") yet put the Panzer IV's 7.5 cm KwK 40 L/43-48 main gun in the same groups as the US 75mm and Soviet 76mm main gun of which there was no comparison in terms of armor piercing. Another sad thing is all "heavy" heavy tanks have the same armor, gun, and speed abilities, as does the "medium" tanks (Sherman M4, Cromwell, and T34). All in the name of "balance". Toss in using player controlled 105mm artillery (too close to troops, there should be mortars instead), and bombing runs by heavy bombers (B17's would never drop ordnance within a stone's throw of their own troops), these types of things make guys like me shake our heads.
We don’t know about game design but we do know about balancing different aspects of capability and it’s a challenging task. There are always losers with compromise.
I was trained to fire the LMG ( Bren) from the hip….. we loaded with tracer every 4 th round….quite easy changing mags too from your own pouch.
We walked firing too never ran unless you pulled up carrying handle….. as you said very accurate weapon….
CQB fire by bounds is an interesting one to have a drill for - much better from the prone but at least it meant the Bren gunner could get stuck in for house clearing!
the ending WOW amazing .
Thanks Bob. Hopefully you've taken a look at the full video: ruclips.net/video/lARgVokqQ48/видео.html
I'm surprised you didn't mention the Vickers K gun. Which, according to one source online, saw service atop the extendable ladders borrowed from London Fire Brigade with the American Rangers who attacked Pointe du Hoc on D-Day.
That source might have been us! We’re doing a special bonus on the role of the K but in the meantime watch our old one: US Rangers using the Vickers Gas-Operated (Class K) Gun
ruclips.net/video/my3-vdrgJro/видео.html
@@vickersmg you might well be the original source but I saw it on the American Rifleman after a certain YT channel said the Rangers used the very similar Lewis gun on their D-Day coverage this year. The picture shown didn't look like a Lewis gun to me. I'll be checking out your video soon.
Great. We’ve got a longer one of the VGO too so take a look at that.
Specific K gun video now available! ruclips.net/video/YEjBc_qe0Dc/видео.html
One thing you don't see in HLL (or any video game, really) is the fact that in WWII the machine gun was king, and the machine gun was the firepower of the squad with the other weapons there pretty much to protect and support it. One MG can spew out far more firepower than multiple riflemen, especially if they're using bolt actions, but needs protection from flank and rear attacks.
All major powers used their LMGs in that way so it would be interesting to see how 50% of the LMG’s ammunition could be carried by the other men in the section.
Red Orchestra/Rising Storm 2 did a good job at it, MG's were godlike even the Dp-27
Interesting. Perhaps we need to look at some different games too.
The German soldiers were effectively ammo porters for the squad MG42 many of them didn’t even fire their own rifles
We're currently doing some deep dive research into the Bren and the doctrine shows that we used the Bren in the same way - "The rifle is the personal weapon of the indvidual. It will be needed to augment the fire of the L.M.G. when required in an emergency, for local protection, and especially for "sniping" single enemy." The BRITISH Small Arms Training pamphlet No 4 for the Bren, 1942: archive.org/details/1942-uk-sat-1-pam-4/page/n19/mode/2up
*casually lifts machine gun* 01:38
Well we’re not sure it was casual but it was well braced! Rich is used to lifting the Vickers more: ruclips.net/video/ZQ28GHzT0DI/видео.html
Hi, Very nice video. I have been following for awhile now. I enjoy your videos. Well done and carry on (salute)
Thank you very much. Our video output has been limited over the last few months but hopefully we've a better set up for doing so now.
I think it was 12 Canadians in Hong Kong in December 1941, cleared the cemetery in Port Stanley of the Japanese. As they ran they cleared the cemetery firing from the hip. When they reached the buildings at the top, successfully driving the Japanese out of the cemetery, forced were forced to fall back to the lower side of the cemetery as I believe there was only 2 of them left.
Thank you. Horrible fighting that! We’ve watched some of the @ww2tv videos on the battle and can thoroughly recommend them.
A short but great video. Yes, I;m biased towards the Bren but the sound of the Vickers was fantastic.
Glad you enjoyed it! The Bren is a great LMG and would be a super designated marksman rifle as well. It's very impressive at doing things the Vickers wasn't designed to do.
I always thought the Lewis with the round magazine was a good idea for fixed positions where you can get at extra mags easily.
Plenty of ammo and no messing with belts.
The challenge was overheating due to the aircooling. It couldn't support the sustained fire needed for true machine gunnery so the Vickers had that role and kept it strongly until the 1960s.
@@vickersmg Strensall Barracks 1963. How to get rid of 5 million rounds of 303: Get a Vickers go to the range and start shooting.
For an entire week. Afterwards the gun was still within spec. Can you imagine the size of the pile of spent brass?
Was it possible to convert a Vickers to fire 7.62 x 51 from a disintegrating link belt?
A tale from ‘Pride of the Emma Gees’ (vickersmg.blog/product/the-vickers-machine-gun-pride-of-the-emma-gees/) and apparently it was six million according to the chap who witnessed it as he corrected us afterwards.
Yes, the Vickers was used by the South Africans in 7.62x51 right up until the 1980s. It used disintegrating link but needed a special type.
Brass from the Bren loves to jump down your sleeves .
Not quite as bad as where it jumps when firing the Vickers in shorts!
Hi Richard, why did the bren have stainless steel from the gasport to the muzzle?
Because of the aggressive cordit, or to simplify production? Greetings from Germany
That’s the flash eliminator as it’s likely to make cleaning easier.
@@vickersmg I think you are right. The cordite residue is blown in front of the shield and then towards the muzzle.
The front stainless steel part was designed to be a wear part and replaceable in Mk I, but since the whole barrel is quick detachable in Mk II and onwards the stainless steel part was eliminated.
The whole barrel is detachable on the Mark 1 as well. We're not aware of any British consideration of the flash eliminator only being changed or spares carried of it in the gun group (based on printed manuals).
Nice content ! I do enjoy !
Excellent! Thanks for saying so. We can’t monetise this content and we do rely on donations so if you can please pop across to vickersmg.blog/about/support/ and pick a way of helping us out - even help fund an MG42 for the collection!
Personal anecdote incoming. My grandad was in the Royal Engineers and found himself in the Black Forest at the end of the war. Wanting to supplement their rations with some actual meat, he went hunting boar with a Bren.
I’ve been camping in woods with Boar in France and I think I’d have wanted a Bren! Sounds like he’d have got the meat for dinner.
@@vickersmg He was a law unto himself, so I don't fancy the boars' chances.
I bet they ate well!
@@vickersmg He came back from Germany looking remarkably tanned and healthy, so maybe that's why...
A few trips around the Black Forest in the sunshine sounds like a good way of winding down after a War.
00:15 - the left hand is over the ejection port on the underneath of the weapon. That would really hurt!!
Absolutely! That’s where the game puts the hands. A very bad day if you’ve done that!
@@vickersmg I took an ejected blank case on the top of one finger once, and that was enough to make sure I never did it again.
Ouch!
Evolved were soilders all have the firepower of a bren each now
Rate of fire: yes. Accuracy: maybe. Weight of bullet: not for everyone! Comparative historical analysis on this stuff is great to do.
I wonder if it could be a new class in HLL called 'Heavy Machine Gun' where you have 2 or maybe even 3 guys in the squad, one the gun operator and the other one (or two) carrying extra machine gun rounds/boxes and scouting capabilities (binoculars). This class type has access to bigger automatic machine guns for example the Vickers K seen in the video.
There's lots of scope for it to be included. Maybe the Vickers K (check out our short video released yesterday) but that could be an upgrade for the Bren for special missions.
It was actually withdrawn from the British army for being to acurate.
We moved over to the GPMG as it proved to be an effective area suppressing weapon with a better rate of fire and multirolled use.
It wasn’t withdrawn completely until 2002 and stayed on alongside GPMG for many years. It was much more suited to roles where a No 2 couldn’t be in close proximity or where belt-feed caused problems. A superbly accurate gun that can game the scoring system for most shoots very easily by either keeping it on repetition for automatic shoots or using automatic for ‘number of rounds on target’ shoots.
Thanks Rich. Can the Bren easily be fired from the shoulder as easily as depicted in Hell Let Loose?
Let’s go with ‘no’ as in ‘not that easily’ but it could be for single shots.
@@vickersmg Considering we have an account of one absolute unit shoulder-firing a Lewis from an aeroplane I would not rule it out with a Bren...
As a happy ex-user of the 7.62 L4 version, I'd suggest no, not as easily, there's a bit too much metal to keep in the air unless you are a rather well built and muscled person (and I am definitely not that!). 🙂
it’s definately possible, you can shoulder fire PKMs, GPMGs and SAWs albeit not accurately. I’d wager i’d be able to fire the Bren from the shoulder a lot more accurately than those 3. So yes as long as you aren’t built like a human noodle.
Ive fired BREN and GPMG from the shoulder on CQB ranges in the 80s . It used to be taught. Its not "easy" but managable with practice. You have to let the barrel down between bursts due to the weapons weight.
You did not mention the use of the barrel carry handle adjustment into a foregrip enabling it to be fired from the shoulder.
Because it shouldn’t be used for that! It places too much strain on a part not designed for it and we’ve seen one break while in use but thankfully not firing. The correct place to hold is the bipod legs. There are photos of it being fired by the barrel carrying handle but there are always photos of things that shouldn’t happen.
Iconic does not do justice to these weapons.
Very true. We’re privileged to be able to do what we do with them.
Dad was a vickers machiec gunner. As # 1
That’s great. Well we hope the channel gives you some insight into what he did.
How bout Boyz anti tank rifle?
Is it in the game! If so, we’ll happily take a look.
@@vickersmg yes, on anti tank class.
We’ll add it to the list!
how many rounds through those mounted sewing machines before they start cooking usually? before water cooling or barrel change out?
They boil the 7.5 pints after 600 rounds rapid (five minutes ish) then lose 1.5 pints every 1000 rounds rapid (eight minutes).
@@vickersmg plenty or what? struggle to keep up with loading belts to keep her fed before you have to worry about the barrel?
Depends on the rate of fire. If you’re doing a big task, with lots of belts prepped, you’d be firing at a slower rate of fire which may not even boil the water.
@@vickersmg yer like it they were set up and just doing stitches? wave after wave just stitch em? or how do you mean? or you mean in real life, they dont just keep running to the slaughter? so its in bursts or?
Machine guns would be set up further back where they could manage their fire and be protected by infantry if they were doing any planned shoot. If they were defensive in the front line then they’d be in the wrong place! It did happen (and many a gallantry award was received as a result) but the guns often then overheated or ran out of ammunition.
There's a handed down story about the BREN that during trials it was considered, like the Lewis gun, as a weapon for use in air to air fighting. To try it out a BREN was set up in a fixed jig 200 yards from a canvas target. All the big wigs from the Air Ministry and RAF gathered round to watch the test, the range officer pulled the cord attached to the trigger and fired off a full magazine. All the brass gathered at the target to find that there was one single hole in it, not quite in the centre but pretty close. The concensus was that only one bullet had hit the target so they said thanks very much but no thanks and left. The range officer was puzzled, so he checked the mounting of the jig to see if it hadn't moved. He checked the sightline of the BREN to make sure it was on target, it was. He then walked down to the target and, still puzzled, he examined it again. Frustrated he put his hands in his pockets and found a live .303 round and offered it up to the hole in the target. He said words to the effect of "Blow me down" as he saw that the hole was slightly bigger than the round and that every bullet from the BREN had gone through it! The big wigs turned down the gun because of its, perceived, inaccuracy but more importantly it was magazine fed, not belt fed. The range officer contacted the Enfield factory to tell them what he had found about the gun's accuracy and recommended that they flog it to the army after making a minor adjustment to give it a slightly larger cone of fire.
Well that's a new one on us! We have the full trials reports for the Bren included in our uploads of the Small Arms Committee Minutes as we're pretty sure it's not in there (and it would have been!). The lack of large capacity magazine and the rate of fire would have made it very unsuitable as an aircraft gun at that point in time. The full index of minutes is available for anyone to view: www.patreon.com/posts/small-arms-and-40900032 and subscribe if you want to read the reports.
Great video! Was the mobile Vickers K used more in combat in ww2 than the Lewis gun? I know from your videos it was used by the commandos in the invasion of Normandy and was used in Operation Infatuate and for the assault at Walcheren.
The Lewis accounts for at least one VC action (I'd have to check my recent Armax paper to remember exactly what that was) so it was used in combat but not with the infantry. The Vickers GO / K was an assault weapon only used by the Commandos so not with the line infantry either. It was very much the Bren as the widespread LMG.
@@vickersmg off the top of my head, Sgt. Thomas Durrant's V.C. for the St. Nazaire raid was Lewis gun related.
That sounds about right. I’ve written a whole paper on the use of small arms on VC actions but I can’t remember the dataset. I’ll have to upload it all at some point!
There is some evidence that the Lewis gun shot down more enemy aircraft than any of the other AA weapons available to British forces including 3.5inch, 20mm Oerlikon, 40mm Bofors, 40mm Pom Pom, 4.5 inch etc....
Primarily this was due to its ubiquity when British forces faced enemy aircraft the most...
You’ll have to back that one up with the evidence!
Had a go with a Bren when I was in cadets, They had to put sandbags on my legs to stop it pulling me forwards all 6 stone of me haha.
We found that’s only really a problem when firing it on repetition and it stops when firing automatic.
@@vickersmg Yes I think it was on single shot and probably for a good reason!, It was bloody loud I think it would of been around 1993 before we would of worn ear protection maybe I can't remember.
It’s quite interesting how the specific use has become very generalised though and a lot of people think that it’s just the way the Bren worked, but that defies physics really! I remember my first couple of years in cadets about that time when ear protection wasn’t too common.
@@vickersmg yes I struggle to remember although earlier on in the day I had shot the Lee Enfield and the SLR and I wasn't really up to shooting anything else after that 😄
Hopefully we’ll be adding an SLR into the collection soon, but we have a couple of other projects to complete first. Head over and check them out: vickersmg.blog/product-category/project-support/
dammmmn sick video
Glad you think so!
i always wonder what happened to the top loading machine guns?
Belt-fed took over.
Thanks. I have a piece of ammo belt that has its guide set every five rounds instead of three. I wonder what that is. It dates from WW1.
I thought it was for the Schwarzlose MG but could be wrong.
@@vickersmg Thank you!
You’re welcome.
"Sir the british are back for the colonies"
"what are they equipped with"
"funnily enough, vickers"
"Dear god..."
Lots of them!
Such a shame they can't get the firing sound correct.
We had a developer come and record our 16 gun shoot last July so we know the sound is out there and plenty of firearms dealers support that so it shouldn’t be difficult to get. We’ll licence our own audio too.
WWII Home Guard at least in Glasgow had Lewis guns on rooftops for anti-aircraft duty. src: family fact.
Anti-aircraft was their main use in the Second World War.
HLL thought it was a good idea to add the bren without the use of a bipod....wtf...also the bipod mechanic is broken to begin with so why they didnt fix it is beyond me, but "wE GoT fasTEr Run spEEd" ...what were they thinking?
We know nothing of the game itself so can’t comment on that but using the Bren without the bipod does limit it’s role and doesn’t reflect the doctrine of the day.
What about the Vickers K?
We’ve a short video explaining that coming up in the next few days!
We've just published a video answering that! ruclips.net/video/YEjBc_qe0Dc/видео.html
how do you get into guns in the uk? i have been interested in them for ages but figured because i was in england there was no chance..
There are lots of shooting clubs around the country for rifle and shotgun shooting. The weapons we have, other than the rifles, are considered prohibited weapons and require special authority from the Home Office. We’ll be sharing a video about that in the next few weeks and it will explain more. Please do subscribe and turn on notifications to make sure you don’t miss it. Sign up to our patreon at www.patreon.com/VickersMG if you’d like to support us some more.
How do we own machine guns in the UK? The answer.
ruclips.net/video/agMgt_boi8o/видео.html
Was the 100 round pan ever considered for infantry use, even in static positions? Or was the Vickers just considered preferable in such scenarios and the 100 round variant too heavy for mobility?
For the rate of fire of the Bren, and the lack of sights that work with the drum fitted, the standard 30-round magazine was much more appropriate. The Vickers was chosen for its high rate of fire more than the magazine capacity.
@vickersmg I see (thanks for the reply), so in a real situation the two working in situ is ideal, gaining accuracy/flexibility with one and suppression with the other, which isn't a model easily adapted to uncoordinated squads in Hell Let Loose I suppose.
One other question if you don't mind, in Hell Let Loose the sights are near unusable. Do you think they've been too literal in their interpretation and so not considered how the sights seemed in practice?
I could smell that last clip, aaah, cordite mmmm
All new ammunition so it wasn’t quite as choking as cordite thankfully. Head over and watch the full video and there’s more to come tomorrow.
Sort the sling out properly and then the Bren is easier enough to fire from the hip. Heck, the same can be done with a GPMG. Sure not ideal, but controlled and accurate enough to be effective at reasonable ranges for patrolling and FIBUA. It is controllable and shots can be walked in. Once on target hold it there with single, double or short bursts. Carry one for a week and you soon learn.
Absolutely. The sling helps a lot and the later padded versions even better! It seems the game is using the Bren like that but expecting to be accurate out to 400 yards whereas the CQB stance is really 50 yards maximum.
@@vickersmg Set up the sling correctly, by winding the right arm around the back part of the sling and you can get a solid base. It kind of locks up and becomes enough for reasonable control to be effective out to 200m. Getting the sling the right length takes some faffing about until right. From seeming to do nothing it suddenly just sets in solid when right.
That and the side grip and you almost have "Aliens 2" heavy weapons carry.
Perfect for shooting from inside of buildings without getting near the window, and you can move rooms too fast enough so changing your fire position.
I saw loads of machine gunners never learn that trick, because basically no one had shown them.
Interesting. We had one of the barrel handles snap during a demonstration once - thankfully not while firing - so it shows why they used the bipod legs to support rather than the carry handle.
@@vickersmg Soldiers can break anything.
Don't get me wrong when possible, and static for any length of time, use the bipod.
Interestingly our shooting team used the Bren foresight elements as the post were slimmer than general SLR issue.
I only carried a Bren for a short while until issued a GPMG. That was a long time ago.
The point of the collection is to retail knowledge for prosperity.
Gun matches at Bisley were won by the Bren Teams over the GPMG's until the rules were changed. A good gunner could single tap with the rhythm of the gun to stay giving central hits and not wander off. With the Bren you could barely notice the difference to full auto. The GPMGs are noticeably faster, though can still be single tapped..
The first thing I was taught on the GPMG not in the user manual was to stamp on the cocking handle to clear a stuck cartridge jam. Anything goes to get them back into action.
In truth I had few difficulties with either Bren or GPMG, they were both highly reliable.
the optics are GREAT :D
??
Could u imagine storming trenches with 5 guys each carrying one clearing g out tranches ,one shoot then the other taking over while the other reload ,
Plus there not all pussey during ww2 they shot from the hip half the time ,
Half the time they were pushing forward the other half defending there Position
Yeah but they didn't cluster LMGs like that in any situation - they're assets to look after as much as possible!
Why did the Lewis gun have such a large muzzle?
It was air cooled and that allows air all around the barrel, which sits in the centre of that space.
@@vickersmg Now I know, thank you. It looks more like an air trap than an air circulator.
It's a shame that your visual re-creation of firing a Bren has the firer with his hand under the magazine. The used cases would be ejected downwards and the open action under the breech would slice up his hand after dropping hot bullet cases into his hand. Bad mistake!
Do you mean the game recreation? If so, that’s one of the things we comment on in the video. The clip of us firing with the close quarter battle drill has the firer holding the bipod, where he should be.
Well, the Lewis certainly wasn't out of service after Dunkirk!
It wasn’t used to arm the regular infantry units though. Bren production was in full swing and they quickly recovered any losses.
@vickersmg So, was it just the Home Guard who were exclusively armed with it at section level?
It might have been with some Territorial Army units still but for a very short period and unlikely first-line stuff. The Royal Artillery had them with the anti-aircraft batteries as well. There were also a lot of vehicle and boat mounted Lewis around, with the Royal Air Force too.
@vickersmg So where does the VGO figure in all of this then? 🤣
Hell Let Loose - What about the Vickers K?
ruclips.net/video/YEjBc_qe0Dc/видео.html
'Give 'em the whole nine yards'
Well... vickersmg.blog/in-use/myths/
I need a number two! ;-)
When you’re number two is on your shoulder, you know it’s a good one.
" the full nine yards " discuss
Not the Vickers. End. vickersmg.blog/in-use/myths/
What needs to be added is that special forces of the British Army used the VGO or Vikers K machine gun in Africa and Europe!
Only jeep mounted in North Africa and then used by the Army Commandos in North West Europe for specific operations rather than wide-spread use. Take a look at our overview video on the VGO: ruclips.net/video/OZnoh4KSros/видео.html
Video now available answering this: ruclips.net/video/YEjBc_qe0Dc/видео.html
Was the Lewis gun, not an American designed weapon? Was the Bren gun, not a Czechoslovakian design weapon licenced to the UK?
Yes, Lewis was an American and it was built by FN in Belgium. Bren started as the ZB in BRno, Czechoslovakia, and licensed to the Royal Small Arms Factory in ENfield, hence the name.
Is it legal to own these guns in UK?
They’re classed as prohibited weapons and need authority from the Home Office. It’s a question we’re regularly asked so have produced a short video about it that will be shared in the next few weeks. Make sure you subscribe to find out more and consider supporting us on www.patreon.com/VickersMG if you’d like to help us fund the Association.
How do we own machine guns in the UK? The answer.
ruclips.net/video/agMgt_boi8o/видео.html
Many of the players are dissastisfied with their portrayal. What do you think of the guy holding the ejection port on the Bren? Would you be open to consulting the developer?
He’s going to get some very hot and bashed fingers doing so! It’s completely the wrong position to hold the gun when firing from the hip. We’d be very happy to work with any developers. We’re a not-for-profit with the object to get people informed about the history of things so this outreach has been great.
@@vickersmg If you were to turn this into a serious collaboration with Team17 it could boost your reach even further. The Dev/Publisher is British and based in wakefield. Theyve received lots of complaints and there's rumours of a rework. If you were to help them out youve got a good chance of securing a lot of good publicity.
We’ve tagged etc in a few posts across social media. We may reach out directly as it would be good to help.
@@vickersmg yes please that will help a lot!!!
Love from Ecuador
Well that’s great. If players have a mechanism to tag them and invite them as well, please do and perhaps mention this video.
Vickers "K"?
Vickers Gas-Operated Machine Gun (the Vickers 'K'): An Overview
ruclips.net/video/OZnoh4KSros/видео.html
Or watch our latest vid: ruclips.net/video/YEjBc_qe0Dc/видео.html
The Sten ?
Hell Let Loose - the real British submachine guns
ruclips.net/video/jEt68Gkxack/видео.html
Bloody spiffing!
Glad you think so!
Pretty interesting, & no Gung ho Heros
Thanks, glad you enjoyed it.
Most Lewis and Savage guns ended up on RNPS trawlers, DEM Ships and bolted onto the bridges of colliers in the vain hope they could fend off a Ju87/88.
Yes, many did, and then landing craft of all ships. The recently shared photos of Churchill visiting the Normandy beaches just after Op OVERLORD show a nice Mark 3 or 4 Lewis in the background.
@@vickersmg my friends great uncle was crew on a collier and he showed us (when I was wee - long long time ago) a picture of him looking mean on his ship with his gun. I said something about it being a Lewis gun and he told me that it was a Savage Gun. I think these were just Lewis guns made under licence. They also had one of those odd potato digger machine guns. I’m not sure if their name, though. American again with a bizarre swinging arm thing under the barrel.
Probably because the Savage-made guns were stamped Savage in the top so that’s what he’d have seen. The ‘potato diggers’ were Colt guns from an 1895 design. They’re only other use was with the Canadian Expeditionary Force and we’ll do a little more on those in the future.
@@vickersmg Oh cool. Look forward to that.
Hope they got licences for those.
You can watch this vid to understand more about U.K. machine gun ownership: MGC2022 Planning the events Q&A #vickersmg
ruclips.net/user/live1njLHKuOYIo?feature=share
How do we own machine guns in the UK? The answer.
ruclips.net/video/agMgt_boi8o/видео.html
I have a wood pecker at my place that sounds just like your Bren
Either that or the local wildlife is fighting back against those game shooters!
wow..5:45
Glad you liked it. Have you watched the full video yet?
@@vickersmg anything with a Bren or Vickers in has to be watched
Well we’ve got plenty of that!
Peter Gore Seer,
I Asked A Ex Soldiers
,About The Brenn Gun, It Was Usless, Not Accurate, The Rifle Was The Killer, And Wasted Less Bullets.
They're wrong or used the Bren badly.