How Hypersonic Wind Tunnels Recreate Mach 20

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 27 сен 2024
  • Wind tunnels have been part of aviation research since before the first powered aircraft took to the skies. And there are a huge range of capabilities available to researchers, including the ability to test models are mach numbers close to orbital velocity.
    I discovered the thumbnail image on a NASA page showing a Mach 20 helium wind tunnel testing a model of the Space Shuttle Orbiter and thought it was worth explaining how all this comes together to create the image.
    www.nasa.gov/m...
    If you want to read more about the evolution of wind tunnels there's a book which primarily covers NASA's (and NACA's) wind tunnels
    history.nasa.g...
    Follow me on Twitter for more updates:
    / djsnm
    I have a discord server where I regularly turn up:
    / discord
    If you really like what I do you can support me directly through Patreon
    / scottmanley
    Thumbnail by Concodroid
    / concodroid

Комментарии • 1,2 тыс.

  • @vipondiu
    @vipondiu 2 года назад +831

    The best thing about space is that every little detail of anything is just the tip of an iceberg made out of tons of talent and engineering and people that battled problems and solved them succesfully. Science is awesome

    • @onedaya_martian1238
      @onedaya_martian1238 2 года назад +10

      People sciencing is awesome too !

    • @SetTheCurve
      @SetTheCurve 2 года назад +28

      That’s true if nearly everything, from pencils to the socks you’re wearing, to the phone you’re watching this on.

    • @kevfaherty123
      @kevfaherty123 2 года назад +4

      Well said!

    • @BeyReaper
      @BeyReaper 2 года назад +5

      That really is the case with science and research. Trying to engineer an object, like the space shuttle, that undergoes a lot of loads, thermal, structural, and aerodynamic, requires developing testing new methods all the time. As Scott mention these two things, it requires loads of knowledge from different aspects involved to research these things, including knowledge in the properties of air, fundamentals of fluids in all regimes of fluid flow, but also understanding the drawbacks in testing these methods. These drawbacks are considerations that have to be taken into account when testing at scale models, like understanding what error is generated from when scaled down and how that effects the the full model.
      You could easily imagine that hypersonics wind tunnel testing is a lecture that could last 2 hours at minimum and, without covering the technique of performing these tests, would cover all the methods, considerations, physics, scaling, be it non-dimensional numbers or systematic error, that is considered. A well experienced scientist or professor can get down to the nitty gritty of testing in wind tunnels.

    • @shawntipton5078
      @shawntipton5078 2 года назад +1

      Perhaps but The question of God/divine is often called the prime reason people practice science and is the main scientific question and goal in all fields. Astronomy is such a deep and intruding area of study. Both Science and faith are awesome, both have universally worked in harmony and both have gifted the world and contributed enormously, most scientists known and asked express deep religious beliefs. Religious study is the more complex of the two, creating evolutionary theories, discovering natural laws such as chemistry, biology and physics and then allowing science to unlock them. The key to understanding the physical universe in terms of language though is mathematics. It could be said that if you understand advanced mathematics, you understand the physical universe

  • @cubfan
    @cubfan 2 года назад +1115

    Really cool how a single image can spark curiosity and learning about some very interesting science. Great video Scott.

  • @jajssblue
    @jajssblue 2 года назад +246

    Man, I wish I was a kid again. I was desperate for science explainers like Scott in the pre-internet 90's. I remember just having to take a book's short description of this phenomena for granted, but not really understanding it until decades later in college.

    • @magnemoe1
      @magnemoe1 2 года назад +4

      This, now today its 3 sorts of problems. The easy ones like how to make an hyper sonic wind tunnel. Stuff none know and stuff you can not google :)

    • @billhanna2148
      @billhanna2148 2 года назад +1

      @@magnemoe1 well, texted,🤔

    • @PyroDesu
      @PyroDesu 2 года назад

      Carl Sagan, perhaps?

    • @signalworks
      @signalworks 2 года назад +12

      As a kid, I’m seriously grateful to have so many opportunities. Thanks to all who came before me, who made this life possible

    • @Lucien86
      @Lucien86 2 года назад +8

      The worst thing about the time before You Tube was having to rely very often on people like science journalists. So often wrong, so often subtly incorrect in ways that are not east to spot. That can mess people up technically for years or for the rest of their life.

  • @LeoH3L1
    @LeoH3L1 2 года назад +81

    I studied aeronautical engineering years ago, and got to use a wind tunnel for a project, it was subsonic, but we also had a blow down supersonic wind tunnel, that one worked by decompressing a chamber, and compressing another, and quickly releasing the pressure, and using a trigger to start a camera to record the shock waves around the model in the test section :)

    • @RightFootForward11
      @RightFootForward11 2 года назад +5

      I designed a supersonic blow down wind tunnel for my senior project this year. Not really, it’s actually pressure tanks going through ball valves and pressure regulators into a settling chamber, then another ball valve with air blowing through a nozzle rigged with thermocouples and pitot static probes. The idea is to cheaply manufacture nozzles for a Jetcat hobbyist turbojet, since the nozzles don’t have to withstand thermal stress from the hot exhaust. The purpose of the test rig is to simulate the Mach coming out of the turbine of my engine (M=0.918), but I have had Mach 1.9 flow coming out of it before I had the regulators dialed in properly

  • @VinayPai
    @VinayPai 2 года назад +627

    I'm surprised Destin from Smarter Every Day didn't get summoned when you said "laminar flow" at 1:25.

    • @CxOrillion
      @CxOrillion 2 года назад +87

      You have to say it 3 times while looking in the mirror.

    • @VeganAncientDragonKnight
      @VeganAncientDragonKnight 2 года назад +45

      @@CxOrillion yes a mirror made of laminar flow.

    • @doggonemess1
      @doggonemess1 2 года назад +1

      @@Stylofo4m XD

    • @johndemeritt3460
      @johndemeritt3460 2 года назад +9

      @@Stylofo4m, yeah, I saw that video yesterday. I'm sure he'll show up as soon as all traces of the mayo are gone -- I think that camera belongs to one of his partners.

    • @garnergc
      @garnergc 2 года назад +20

      I thought you had to make a circle out of snatch blocks when saying laminar flow in the mirror for him to appear

  • @nelsongarcia8959
    @nelsongarcia8959 2 года назад +72

    Some of us look at a cat video on youtube and still can't explain in simple terms what a cat is. Scott Manley sees one 50 year-old picture and, in a few minutes, explains multiple mind-blowing scientific facts via the same cat video delivery platform.

    • @93_LXcpe
      @93_LXcpe 2 года назад +1

      And 67 people thumb this down 🤦‍♂️

    • @bbgun061
      @bbgun061 2 года назад +4

      To be fair, cats are enigmatic creatures with mysterious and devious motivations. Hypersonic fluid dynamics is easy stuff to explain in comparison.

    • @OphisUK
      @OphisUK 2 года назад +2

      An endothermic quadriped, carnivorous by nature.

    • @nelsongarcia8959
      @nelsongarcia8959 2 года назад +1

      @@OphisUK That sure narrows it down for me, LOL

  • @buzzmas8068
    @buzzmas8068 2 года назад +53

    I FINALLY understand how converging/diverging nozzles work! Something about this explanation made it click for me

    • @oliverriall
      @oliverriall 2 года назад +2

      Yes, me to, I think the bit about all the energy being stored up as it just can't move through the gap anymore and then thinking of air exploding on the other side.

    • @danh2716
      @danh2716 2 года назад +1

      Agreed. A better explanation than most college engineering textbooks as far as just explaining the concept.

    • @oadka
      @oadka 2 года назад

      Me too!

    • @ananttiwari1337
      @ananttiwari1337 2 года назад

      SAME!!!

  • @devincastellucci4627
    @devincastellucci4627 2 года назад +347

    This was a fascinating topic and a fabulous job explaining it.

    • @MonkeyJedi99
      @MonkeyJedi99 2 года назад +2

      I have to say, I've never put it together that rocket engines and wind tunnels are so closely related.
      One of those "Oh yeah!" moments.

  • @petergerdes1094
    @petergerdes1094 2 года назад +199

    This was amazing. It's this kind of content that makes this my favorite RUclips channel! Technical content well explained without treating the viewer either as an idiot or requiring we actually do the calculations.

    • @eyoelgebre5849
      @eyoelgebre5849 2 года назад +5

      100% agree with you. Very interesting subjects that were well researched and explained perfectly. Thanks Scott!

  • @eddiezebeast
    @eddiezebeast 2 года назад +147

    "But in the end, after testing, it was vastly more successful at converting aviation fuel into noise pollution" How much do I like these sarcastic quotes 😁

    • @thesherbet
      @thesherbet 2 года назад +10

      best bit is that's not even sarcasm, thats just an objective statement xD

    • @therflash
      @therflash 2 года назад +1

      @@thesherbet Noise polution is a tad of an understatement.

    • @MrTrashmasterfx
      @MrTrashmasterfx 2 года назад +2

      I had tears in my eyes after he said that because of laughter

    • @lazarus2691
      @lazarus2691 2 года назад +6

      @@therflash Indeed. It was so loud it literally made people sick.
      "On the ground "run ups", the prototypes could reportedly be heard 25 miles (40 km) away."
      "The aircraft was notorious for inducing severe nausea and headaches among ground crews."
      "In one report, a Republic engineer suffered a seizure after close range exposure to the shock waves emanating from a powered-up XF-84H."

    • @mikeclarke952
      @mikeclarke952 2 года назад +5

      Yeah you pretty much needed an old priest and a young priest to get near that abomination. "The power of Christ compels thee!". As they flick holy gasoline on it.

  • @johnturnbull7798
    @johnturnbull7798 Год назад +85

    Impressive! I am ashamed to say I am supposed to know all this ( I do really) but would trip over myself trying to explain it to the layman. Scott does a great job leading you through the subject starting from the basics, explaining the issues and they way they have been resolved to achieve Mach 20. I am very impressed.

    • @NaqrSeranvis
      @NaqrSeranvis Год назад +2

      Don't be ashamed. Not every specialist (which I assume you are if you are supposed to know that) has to be a good teacher as well. Some people are good at accumulating knowledge and using it, but not necessarily at sharing it (actually that 'some' a significant if not vast majority of people whose brains develop in a way that causes them to take interest in complex technical concepts).

    • @WhiteOwlOnFire_XXX
      @WhiteOwlOnFire_XXX Год назад

      Get some knee pads why don’t ya

    • @johnnypopstar
      @johnnypopstar Год назад +2

      @@WhiteOwlOnFire_XXX It's actually ok to appreciate people and/or things.

  • @mikebridges20
    @mikebridges20 2 года назад +14

    Scott, I teach engineering to high school students, and one of the classes is Aerospace engineering. I can't tell you how much I've learned from your videos, and I'm incorporating as much as I think high school seniors can understand into my classes. Thanks so much!

  • @Spashium
    @Spashium 2 года назад +38

    We just covered wind tunnels and flows in my aerospace engineering course! It feels awesome to really understand everything going on in this video.

    • @will3346
      @will3346 2 года назад

      We just started compressible flow in my thermo/aero class. What uni do you go to?

    • @yangyu9990
      @yangyu9990 2 года назад

      @@will3346 And I'm just finishing compressible flow in my Applied fluid dynamics unit! hahaha big world

    • @Spashium
      @Spashium 2 года назад

      @@will3346 Ohio State, what about you?

    • @will3346
      @will3346 2 года назад

      @@Spashium Ah nice I go to Georgia Tech. What’s Ohio state like?

  • @jamesmnguyen
    @jamesmnguyen 2 года назад +206

    I love how Scott walked us through the thinking process of how to build a hypersonic wind tunnel. I had similar questions at each stage and he answered them immediately.

    • @lossless4129
      @lossless4129 2 года назад +4

      Very very good at this, I agree! Imagine if you always had teaching/learning in this matter!

  • @miroslavmilan
    @miroslavmilan 2 года назад +23

    This must be one of your best videos ever. Really succinct explanation and enjoyable narration.

  • @WWeronko
    @WWeronko 2 года назад +25

    As a mechanical engineer, I have often said to disbelieving laymen, that engineers are some of the most creative people alive. This video does a good job at validating that concept. Thank you Scott.

    • @ronblack7870
      @ronblack7870 2 года назад +3

      yes as an engineer when i hear artists say they are creators i always think to myself yah what do they actually create?

    • @WWeronko
      @WWeronko 2 года назад +4

      @@ronblack7870 I totally agree. I'd like to think the flush toilet is of more practical worth than all the art ever produced.

    • @YounesLayachi
      @YounesLayachi Год назад +2

      Bingo. It applies to theoretical sciences too, they're full of thought experiments, abstract concepts or infinitely unreachable situations

    • @potatofuryy
      @potatofuryy Год назад +4

      Why y’all gotta be so negative lol, no shit art doesn’t have practical uses like engineering, but people enjoy it.

  • @EstorilEm
    @EstorilEm 2 года назад +27

    Such a cool episode! As soon as you mentioned expansion after the restriction area to increase velocity I was like “WAIT a second… thats exactly the same principle as…” and a few seconds later you mention rocket nozzles. 🤣

  • @RustyDust101
    @RustyDust101 2 года назад +14

    Fascinating topic, completely agreed.
    If I may, the "Schlieren Photography" is pronounced "sh-leer-en". Schlieren is the German word for wisps or swirls, such as you get when a drop of mechanical oil glistens on a swirling patch of water in light. Not as critique, simply as pronounciation help for the future.

  • @Zeusbeer
    @Zeusbeer 2 года назад +105

    My university has a mach 10+ wind tunnel, it doesn't run for very long though. I would love to get to use it one day.

    • @PuerRidcully
      @PuerRidcully 2 года назад +23

      If you stood in it while it was operating, I imagine it would do with you the same thing that carburetor does to a droplet of fuel.

    • @Physco219
      @Physco219 2 года назад +3

      What uni?

    • @travcollier
      @travcollier 2 года назад +14

      Back when I was an undergrad (many years ago), a friend of mine worked in a lab with a hypersonic wind tunnel. More like a cannon than what most folks think of as a wind tunnel. Anyways, they made a fun video of a paper airplane getting disintegrated by the shockwave.
      PS: This was at Caltech. Oh, and I'm commenting before watching Scott's video... Wondering how much is going to be familiar ;)

    • @glennpearson9348
      @glennpearson9348 2 года назад +7

      Texas A&M also has a hypersonic wind tunnel. Damn thing is loud!

    • @f0xacid764
      @f0xacid764 2 года назад +6

      ​@@glennpearson9348 We also had one at my uni. Everytime they used it you'd hear it like a gunshot all over campus. They also had warning lights on the nearby street so that the drivers could prepare to be startled :D

  • @UnshavenStatue
    @UnshavenStatue 2 года назад +2

    Forget the wind tunnels, I never understood the rocket nozzle throat thing until now, many thanks for that clear and simple explanation of how fluid physics adjusts relative to sound speed!

  • @crazypete3759
    @crazypete3759 Год назад +13

    I wish they had lessons like this in school. It covers so many topics and in an interesting and engaging format! It seems like schools are more interested in confusing children instead of teaching them.

    • @bluenightfury4365
      @bluenightfury4365 Год назад

      And stressing them out too.

    • @demef758
      @demef758 Год назад +1

      You're not badmouthing Drag Queen Story Time Reading, are you?

    • @crazypete3759
      @crazypete3759 Год назад

      @@demef758 if the shoe fits...

  • @nspinicelli
    @nspinicelli Год назад +9

    Just absolutely impressive… you know your material extremely well when you’re able to describe it to the layman. That’s the sign of subject matter expert!

  • @urmeti
    @urmeti 2 года назад +48

    Brilliant lecture, as always, we're waiting for a long overdue shock wave dynamics video as promised in plutonium implosion devices, looking forward to that Scott!
    Peace from North Wales

  • @kennethblackwell1137
    @kennethblackwell1137 2 года назад +2

    Well done, Scott. As an Aerospace engineer who has tested in wind tunnels all over the country, I get so infuriated at the regular media in talking about hypersonic. Of course they wouldn't begin to understand your discussion. Thanks.

  • @el-domo
    @el-domo 2 года назад +6

    Speaking of wind tunnels, please please feel free to use our open source wind tunnel to use for schools and other activities or just for yourself to have fun. You can find it in our channels. Go ahead and enjoy it.

  • @craigdeandean4036
    @craigdeandean4036 2 года назад +1

    I live 5 miles from Langley and have seen all of that equipment up close and personal many times Now after nearly 50 years
    It is awesome to know how it works thank you Scott great work!!

  • @thomasdunn496
    @thomasdunn496 2 года назад +1

    When growing up in Madison, AL, I used to live down the road from Wyle Lab’s wind tunnel. I think they helped NASA test the shuttle’s aerodynamics there. Whenever Wyle conducted a test, there was always a low-frequency sound that made all the windows rattle. I can definitely see why now after watching this very informative video.

  • @alexwebster7065
    @alexwebster7065 2 года назад +19

    Great video. In case nobody else has mentioned it, I recommend the book "Facing the Heat Barrier" by T.A. Heppenheimer. The first part of the book goes into some detail about the different wind tunnels developed during the early years of the space age, and why they were necessary. It's an absolute must-read if you are interested in how the problems of heat were solved for ICBMs, Apollo, the X-15 and Space Shuttle.

    • @FlyNAA
      @FlyNAA 2 года назад +3

      Came to post about this book!

  • @karlkastor
    @karlkastor 2 года назад +13

    This is way more interesting than I expected. The nozzle based design like in a rocket and the liquification of the air after Mach 4 blew my mind. Btw Schlieren is a German word meaning something like a line of smudges on a surface. It's pronounced more closer to Shlee-ren then what you said.

  • @Iron_Shepherd
    @Iron_Shepherd Год назад +10

    Very well explained, Scott. I love that Saturn-5 rocket model! Seeing it takes me back to when I was a kid, watching Apollo 11 land on the moon.

  • @roderickharvey7857
    @roderickharvey7857 10 месяцев назад

    As a aerospace engineering technician at Langley Research Center for 36 years our job was to install instrument and run the wind tunnels. I worked and operated in over 20 wind tunnels during my career.
    The 20” Mach 20 Helium tunnel shown here and described by Scott was described accurately for the reason for the use of Helium gas. After purification of the helium gas we increased the gas pressure I believe ( sorry I retired 20 years ago) 3000 psi. When the isolation valve for the tunnel to the vacuum sphere was open the 3000 psi helium supply valves were opened and the gas raced thru the orifice and generated Mach 20. No heating of the helium was required. Many years were spent in this and other NASA facilities to develop the final shuttle shape.
    I also worked in the Mach 6 2’x2’ tunnel air in the D wing of Gas Dynamic building 1247 at Langley. To develop Mach 6 with 600 psi air the air was heater to about 425 + degrees to insure the air would not become liquid as it accelerates to Mach 6 thru the nozzle which causes a drop in temperature. If not hot enough the air would liquify into air and droplets of air and invalidate the data.
    So if we used air at Mach 20 what temperature of the air would be required to prevent liquefaction- above my pay grade but probably several thousand degrees. So what material in the structure of tunnels valves and hardware would be required to withstand those temperatures - materials we did not have therefore helium was used.
    I point I noticed in the comments I was technician and had the the immense honor of working with some of the brightest aerospace engineers and managers in our country - these brilliant engineers these public servants worked tirelessly long hours with pay well below many other in the private sector and were true patriots.

  • @Concodroid
    @Concodroid 2 года назад +15

    dang that's a nice thumbnail

  • @larryowsowitz2274
    @larryowsowitz2274 2 года назад +1

    Excellent discussion of basic wind tunnel operations. As an aero engineer it was a fun review. The US Air Force has a facility in Tullahoma, Tennessee that has wind tunnels that run tests from sub sonic to hypersonic. I walked through the the test section of the transonic tunnel that could hold very large scale models (about 20’) for testing.

  • @MrMacgyver69
    @MrMacgyver69 2 года назад +1

    I have modeled, built, and tested a small wind tunnel with 3rd and 5th order contraction sections for use in calibrating instrumentation, but until now I haven’t expanded the math to include my rocketry. Your explanation completely destroyed the bridge and blew my mind. Thank you for the expansion and coalition of my interests!! Pure bliss (techno nerd sorry) :)

  • @irisshea6313
    @irisshea6313 2 года назад +6

    “converting aviation fuel into noise pollution” is such a fantastic descriptor omg

  • @alexeytsybyshev9459
    @alexeytsybyshev9459 2 года назад +4

    I think the reason for using Helium is that, temperature being proportional to the kinetic energy of gas molecules mv^2/2, the lower the mass of the molecule, the lower the temperature (and energy) needed to achieve the same velocity. That is why Helium needs much less heating than air to reach Mach 20. I think this was also used to fire a hypersonic Helium pellet gun in some video.

  • @RamsesYT
    @RamsesYT 2 года назад +7

    Thank you, Scott, for this excellent lecture on these amazing subjects. I thought I understood windtunnels from back in uni but never realized hypersonic speeds present such extreme challenges. I loved to hear you describe my line of thoughts just when I started seeing the similarity of rocket nozzles! That was a great trick!
    It makes me wonder which came first - the hypersonic windtunnel or the rocket nozzle?
    But again, massive thanks for this awesome post! 👌

    • @trolleriffic
      @trolleriffic Год назад

      It's a very late answer, but the rocket nozzle came first - the converging-diverging (De Laval) nozzle was first used in a rocket in 1915 by Robert Goddard. By late-WW2 Germany had wind tunnels that could operate at up to Mach 4.4 and possibly even as high as Mach 5 intermittently. They were also in the process of building one that would reach Mach 7-10. In 1947 John Becker at NACA Langley built a small testbed hypersonic tunnel that reached Mach 6.9 in 1947 - the first hypersonic wind tunnel in the US.

  • @SuperDwarf00
    @SuperDwarf00 2 года назад +1

    In 1968 I was stationed at NAS Moffet Field were Nasa Ames Research center. The wind tunnel would keep us awake ,great stuff

  • @PastrySC
    @PastrySC 2 года назад +3

    Hi Scott. Helium and Hydrogen both have negative joule-Thompson coefficients, which mean they actually heat up in stead of cool down when throttled through an orifice. Maybe that is part of the reason for using Helium here as well. Thanks for an awesome video as always!

  • @tonyduncan9852
    @tonyduncan9852 2 года назад

    I was an apprentice at the NGTE Pyestock supersonic wind tunnel (now a cow pasture). Thanks for updating me a little. Sixty years. . .

  • @BeechSportBill
    @BeechSportBill 2 года назад +1

    The inlet velocity of the project Pluto cruise missile nuclear reactor (ram jet engine) at the Nevada Test Site test facility needed to be Mach 3 @ 2000 degrees to PREVENT meltdown of the flow-through reactor. The engineering in that monster building and equipment was INSANE! There was a 50 acre area covered in air tubes made from something like naval rifle barrels, pumped up with submarine compressors to provide airflow for a 5 minute test. The air tank field fed four huge tanks filled with 2” stainless ball bearings that would be heated to 2000 degrees. I visited there in 2000.

  • @wills.9807
    @wills.9807 2 года назад +1

    A good example of air changing temperature with pressure change can be seen in places that use pneumatically actuated machinery. It's common to have bell-style water traps inline just before the line goes into the machine.
    The compressor releases high pressure air into the distribution lines, cooling it in the process. From there if the atmospheric conditions are right, generally meaning the local dew point, the now colder air causes water to condense in the distribution lines, then the air flow pushes it downstream towards places you really do not want water going.
    The bell traps basically use gravity to catch it before it causes trouble. The bells are usually made from a clear polycarbonate so the operator can see if they're filling up. During the muggiest days with high dew points, it's not uncommon to have to drain the water multiple times a day.

  • @simpleau2
    @simpleau2 2 года назад +9

    That was a great explanation, really interesting stuff!

  • @skuzlebut82
    @skuzlebut82 2 года назад +1

    I'll tell you what. This past Thursday here in Kansas, it felt like we were in a hypersonic wind tunnel. Driving down the road, the paint on my car became an ablative heat shield. Seriously, on Thursday in Kansas we had steady 40 mph winds with gusts over 60 mph, all of that with a blue sky and not a cloud in sight.

  • @FandersonUfo
    @FandersonUfo 2 года назад +8

    helium at Mach 20 is pretty hardcore

    • @jamescollier3
      @jamescollier3 2 года назад

      lol. when you put it that way. Haha

  • @davidneel8327
    @davidneel8327 2 года назад +1

    As part of the lab in my college we had a blow down supersonic tunnel. It was small but we could visualize the shock waves.

  • @JaapvanderVelde
    @JaapvanderVelde 2 года назад

    Your technical storytelling skills are unrivaled, sir. That is some dry matter to explain, but it was super-engaging, chapeau!

  • @alexanderbonardi4514
    @alexanderbonardi4514 2 года назад +3

    I was amazed to discover that the Germans had a Mach 5 wind tunnel in Penemunde.
    I guess this was a high priority article for operation paperclip, seeing how rare and sofisticated these things are.
    Still, to think they where doing this kind of engineering almost 80 years ago.... Mind blowing.

    • @cogoid
      @cogoid 2 года назад +2

      In the lobby of U.S. Food and Drug Administration building (just outside the beltway of Washington DC) there is a huge abstract composition named _"Prototype for Re-Entry"_. It represents a V-2 missile and it is there only because this was the location where these German wind tunnels were installed after the war. It was called White Oak Naval Ordnance Laboratory then. The tunnels were operated by US personnel with the help of 12 German scientists from Peenemünde.

  • @prsearls
    @prsearls 2 года назад

    That is really amazing. I saw the low speed wind tunnel at Langley, decades ago. There is (or was) a RUclips film about how its giant, wooden propellers were built. I hadn't given much thought about supersonic, much less hypersonic, tunnels. Your explanation of the problems and solutions for these is fascinating. I really enjoyed it.

  • @Merennulli
    @Merennulli Год назад

    It's amazing all the complex engineering that went into taking that photo. Great explanation of it!

  • @avalanchas336
    @avalanchas336 2 года назад

    Wow, maybe your best explained video to date, storytelling-wise. Great pacing, great narrative, well done Scott!

  • @TallinuTV
    @TallinuTV 2 года назад

    That's amazing. Being able to put together a whole bunch of different processes and principles to create something that lets you *see* the density of the air, and do it under such extreme conditions... I never fail to be impressed by ingenious solutions like this.

  • @bobschmitz7488
    @bobschmitz7488 2 года назад

    Scott… I’ve watching your videos for sometime now and just wanted to say THANK YOU. I love your how you explain technical things and you make the viewer never to feel dumb. This particular video was fascinating as I never thought about hypersonic testing requirements before. Keep up the excellent work that you do for us!!!!!

  • @XJapa1n09
    @XJapa1n09 2 года назад

    One of the only channels I like the videos before I even watch them. Thanks Scott

  • @julienbeyer9850
    @julienbeyer9850 2 года назад

    For whatever strange reason, all sorts of awesome videos on RUclips have at least some thumbs down votes. But this one doesn't and it truly deserves this special medal. Loved every second of it!

  • @LockeRobsta
    @LockeRobsta 2 года назад

    Usually when you explain the physics behind certain complex topics no I have to watch it a couple of times before I get it but this video I was able to understand pretty much everything you said in one watch. It's a testament to how well you know this topic as you are able to explain it so simply.

  • @samschellhase8831
    @samschellhase8831 2 года назад +1

    this is the first video I've seen of yours and I'm hooked. This is why I want to be more interested in fluid mechanics, it seems like there's so many cool things to learn and find out and connections between disciplines (like chemistry and physics). Arc jet wind tunnels sound incredible, for example, and I want to know more!

  • @deusexaethera
    @deusexaethera 2 года назад +1

    It must be noted that the "garden hose effect" only works if something is imparting enough force to the moving fluid that it is able to build up sufficient pressure to spray harder when you obstruct or narrow the opening. In the case of a garden hose, that force comes from the enormous water pumps at the water treatment plant. In the case of a hypersonic wind tunnel, the compressibility of the fluid (air, or helium in this case) means that the force generally has to be imparted to the fluid well in advance, by compressing it very tightly and then reheating it as it expands when released. Without sufficient force imparted to the fluid, obstructing the opening will reduce the flow rate rather than increasing the pressure.

    • @scottmanley
      @scottmanley  2 года назад

      That’s why you switch from fans to pumps

  • @alexisgervais8716
    @alexisgervais8716 2 года назад

    For me, this has been the best explanation of any scientific/engineering concept ever, so thanks man!

  • @frankgulla2335
    @frankgulla2335 2 года назад +1

    You are amazing when it comes to explaining things with great illustrations and graphics. Thank you.

  • @safetyinstructor
    @safetyinstructor 2 года назад +6

    "Schlieren" is pronounced "Schleeren" not "Schliren

  • @vincTarbes
    @vincTarbes 2 года назад +2

    Good engineering job! The difference between theory and practice ... It reminds me of my lessons in pressure hydraulics, where we learned that from a certain flow, a given section could not swallow more: you can always increase the pressure , no more material will pass in this section. Super interesting to see the technique of these hypersonic test tunnels !!!! Ah, the great Bernoulli (and St Venant !!!) ... As tall as Einstein for hydraulics ...
    Greetings from France

  • @Sirmellowman
    @Sirmellowman 2 года назад +1

    my entire life anytime I heard the term "supersonic or hypersonic wind tunnel" I always wondered how the heck they would ever achieve those speeds in a wind tunnel. this has been very enlightening for me. thank you for the great video!

  • @matthiaspittner434
    @matthiaspittner434 2 года назад +1

    Well, I had to watch a video on wind tunnels to finally understand why the exhaust gas accelerates in a rocket engine nozzle. Thanks, Scott!

  • @Madash023
    @Madash023 2 года назад

    Amazing insight. It was a beautiful abstract image initially, but knowing all this just makes it that much more awesome.

  • @rougeneon1997
    @rougeneon1997 2 года назад

    Cool you did a video on this because the last video with that shuttle test picture blew my mind. So cool.

  • @nicholaswilliams4507
    @nicholaswilliams4507 2 года назад

    Well done! This is definitely a top 10 of your videos.

  • @matthewb8229
    @matthewb8229 2 года назад

    Always quality information from yuo, Scott. My inner nerd appreciates your efforts to make rather complex matters easy to understand.

  • @Simon_Rafferty
    @Simon_Rafferty 2 года назад +1

    Great video! Lot's of stuff I knew (and some I didn't), but hadn't put together into the application of a wind tunnel!

  • @Flightcoach
    @Flightcoach 2 года назад

    Just shared this with my 98 year old granddad, who is an engineer and loves this stuff. Something to talk about for our next drink!

  • @Gammaduster
    @Gammaduster 2 года назад +1

    Fascinating topic! It amazes me how you always come up with great videos I didn't even know were a thing, thank you a lot for your work Scott

  • @dragumand
    @dragumand 2 года назад

    Haven't caught up with your vids in a while. This one rocked! Thank you!

  • @HighOverlordSnarffieBeagle
    @HighOverlordSnarffieBeagle Год назад +2

    this was a surprisingly educational video, I really enjoyed it

  • @VrataVenet
    @VrataVenet 2 года назад

    Fascinating! One of the best videos I have seen on this channel. 👌🏾🙏🏾

  • @roi9875
    @roi9875 2 года назад

    I’m taking a compressible flow class this semester and it’s cool hearing you talk about this stuff while I’m learning about it.

  • @sercatum
    @sercatum 2 года назад

    Genius, both scientist to figure out science behind those processes ... but also you making almost same work to find reasons!
    Echt goede werk!

  • @connecticutaggie
    @connecticutaggie 2 года назад +2

    Scott, cool explanation of hypersonic wind tunnels.
    One thing this made me think of was when I was in College I had a friend the worked at the fluid test facility (where the big wind tunnel was). I recall discussing with him that when they scaled models for fluid testing that they had to scale the materials they went through as well. So, for scaled down oil tankers they could not use water, they had to use a more dense & viscous fluid or they would not get accurate behavior. My recollection is that they used dimensionless numbers to do this (like the Reynolds number). I wonder how using Hydrogen or Helium would affect this. Maybe you need to use materials like that to be correct modeling without having to build a full size space shuttle.

    • @gordonrichardson2972
      @gordonrichardson2972 2 года назад

      All of those factors are true, but helium has very low viscosity, and hypersonic flow isn't about friction but rather shockwaves (the opposite end of the spectrum from ships).

  • @bionova7
    @bionova7 2 года назад

    I always come back to your channel every once in a while because it’s exactly just technical enough while also not feeling like a lecture
    Keep up the good work Scott!

  • @wvrails
    @wvrails 2 года назад +1

    About 25 years ago I worked at NASA's Langley Research Center. Our house was about four miles away (as the crow flies) and we could here the larger wind tunnels running at night. Based on the sound you could tell which one it was. For the blow-down tunnel they pumped up the storage bottles at night, when electricity was cheaper, and ran tests during the day. If you were near the vacuum spheres when a test started it sounded like a really big BB bouncing around inside a very large metal drum.

  • @DriftingPancake
    @DriftingPancake Год назад

    This is actually the background of my iPhone! Awesome to see someone actually review it

  • @SteinGauslaaStrindhaug
    @SteinGauslaaStrindhaug Год назад

    This was fun; a few years ago before watching your videos and playing KSP; if I'd watched this video then, each time you said "and you might be thinking..." I would have quietly protested; but because of all your videos; I actually _were_ thinking: "just make a wide tunnel turn into a narrow one... oh yeah mach 1 will start to make the gas behave weirdly... oh that's basically a rocket engine nozzle" just before you said it! I've obviously learned a lot over the years. This was really fun!

  • @АндрейОнищенко-з8х

    Cool how many people still watch highly technical videos instead of just entertaining ones, makes me less disappointed in the internet

  • @rogerwilco2
    @rogerwilco2 2 года назад

    This might be one of your best videos.
    You explain it very well, even things that I as a trained engineer didn't know.

  • @WayneBorean
    @WayneBorean 2 года назад

    Gotta love rabbit holes. You can learn so many neat things from them.

  • @dogmaticpyrrhonist543
    @dogmaticpyrrhonist543 2 года назад

    The University I went to had a hypersonic wind tunnel based on pressure tanks. One interesting thing was that the "valve" was a pre-scored sheet of steel between the high and low pressure areas, that was activated by hitting it with a laser. It would punch a hole in the sheet, that would then rupture along the scored markings, opening the flood gates. Needless to say, the system was for very short duration tests. :)

  • @crazexskater
    @crazexskater 2 года назад

    I was involved in the construction of a low speed wind tunnel. The contractor was filling in one end with 6' sections of 3" pvc pipe to reduce turbulence of the wind.

  • @mastershooter64
    @mastershooter64 2 года назад +1

    Finally! Now I can start building my own hypersonic wind tunnel

  • @mrcoconut9205
    @mrcoconut9205 2 года назад

    I use this concept very frequently while manufacturing custom headers for vehicles sections called bladders are used on high performance applications

  • @rogerstone3068
    @rogerstone3068 2 года назад +1

    WONDERFUL video. This is why we come here. Thank you Scott. (PS - why didn't they just use the whirlpool vortex at the end of your video? WAY over mach 20, I'll bet.)

  • @jundergaming
    @jundergaming 3 месяца назад

    Great watch! Explained just about everything I was wondering.

  • @nesa1126
    @nesa1126 2 года назад

    Ok, at first I was confused, thinking about rocket nozzles but 4:48 explained all of it. I learn so much from you Scott, thanks!

  • @kornykidd0
    @kornykidd0 2 года назад

    Great explanations. I performed NDT inspections on a hypersonic wind tunnel back in 2013. It was an awesome place and thing to see. The pressures were massive.

  • @supergeek1418
    @supergeek1418 2 года назад +1

    VERY interesting!
    Supersonic fluid dynamics is nothing, if not non-intuitive.
    Thank you for expanding our understanding of these incredibly complex phenomena.

  • @twelfthmanau
    @twelfthmanau 2 года назад +1

    This is wild to me. Im a vascular sonographer where we regularly assess blood flow, looking for stenoses. Distal to the stenosis the tell-tale sign is a dampened flow and low pressure. Presumably this is due to the scale of blood flow not turning hypersonic. But still, super interesting.

  • @harryflashman3141
    @harryflashman3141 2 года назад

    That was amazing and that photo was beautiful. That would look great as a poster.

  • @philipkudrna5643
    @philipkudrna5643 2 года назад

    Again one of the best videos ever. Nobody does it better than Scott! Thank you very much for the simple, comprehensible and very interesting information about what seems to be a simple computer animated image, but is in fact far more!

  • @calebcourteau
    @calebcourteau 2 года назад

    Love your channel Scott. Been watching you for years. You have such a firm grasp on technical topics that you make them sound simple and obvious with your clear explanations, even if the topics are actually quite subtle. Bravo.

  • @debrabuck9330
    @debrabuck9330 2 года назад +1

    I thought that i saw a shock spike while traveling in commercial aircraft when the light was just right. Thanks for confirming.

  • @brianpetersen3429
    @brianpetersen3429 2 года назад

    Great video. Reminds me of when in 8th grade I built a smoke tunnel for my science project. I think I learned more about woodworking and soldering than aerodynamics. Skills that I later used to build custom jazz guitars in retirement.

  • @mattcline6611
    @mattcline6611 2 года назад +1

    Hey Scott, have you ever looked at the wind tunnel at the Kerbal Space Center? Those Kerbals have it all figured out, well, most of the time. The Kerbal wind tunnel is part of the R&D lab.