To the two comments above me, the question isn’t which continent has the strongest teams, but which competition is harder to win. The answer is the World Cup. Nobody cares who Italy lost to; the point is simply qualifying to the World Cup is already harder than the Euros, let alone the actual tournaments.
@@Attacker456 Exactly, not many Asian, African and N.American teams will be in the 32 teams if we put the WC qualification match in only one group like Copa qualifying, 1 to 32 in order. Lol 😂
But we have seen plenty of giant killing in World Cups, especially in the last one. Morocco and Japan shocked a lot of people by beating international champions like Spain and Germany. Seeing Saudi upset Argentina was shocking. Reminds me of when Senegal went on it's great run in 2002. Those are the moments that make the World Cup special
@@disgraced101sure but not win, World Cup winners are usually 4 European teams and 2 South American teams. Germany, Spain, Italy, France, Brazil, Argentina. Those are the 6 countries who are always in contention to win in the World Cup
Uruguay were the underdogs when they won the 1950 World Cup. West Germany were the *MASSIVE* underdogs when they defeated Hungary in the 1954 World Cup final.
Greece won 2004 Euro and didn't qualify for 2006 World Cup. Italy won 2020 Euro and didn't qualify for 2022 World Cup. Chile won 2015 & 2016 Copa America and didn't qualify for 2018 World Cup
@@lonelyboy1977 That’s not true, there’s a difference between being less than favorites than an absolute underdog like Greece that parked the bus in every game in 2004. Brazil were favorites in 1950 but that doesn’t mean that Uruguay were absolute underdogs, Uruguay had just won the first World Cup and two pre-world cup Olympic tournaments, so that’s not an underdog to me. West Germany wasn’t an underdog either, they had some good players and had been on good form the past couple of years. They didn’t park the bus like Greece did and they kept winning subsequent trophies after 1954 which is not the case with Greece, Greece disappeared after that 2004 euro win
Europe. England Spain. Germany Italy France all won a world cup. Only Brazil Argentina and Uruguay have won a world cup in South America. Europe is stronger
This is a thing because Messi won the World Cup. It’s crazy how they are always moving the goal post. At one point Mbappe was on the verge of winning back to back world cups and the entire Euro centric media was about to anoint him as the “greatest ever.” Denmark, Greece and Portugal are all Euro winners so why haven’t they won a World Cup? It took Spain what, 100 years to win a World Cup. Europeans are just robotic football players with no flair, passion of play and natural skills.
Flair and magic yes. Before someone say ohh zidane, platini or cr7 beg to differ, stop it that flair and creativity is at birth in the gene code of Brazilian, Argentinian, Uruguay, Chilean, Colombian. But to say no passion of play, or natural skill is as crazy as saying the euro is harder than the World Cup.
@@edwinborja3570 best football player always none European prove Pele Maradona real Ronaldo Messi their natural talent were develope by football culture unlike European robotic system
Euros harder? WORLD CHAMPIONS Argentina last 5 competitive games vs European teams, 5 wins, 0 losses. That included a 3-0 win vs the reigning European champions btw...
How convenient that you picked the one WC where a South American team won. The previous winner, France would also have beaten every Latin American team and did beat Argentina. So not sure what your point us.
@@claudemakelele2856 i repeat Europe is not the only continent to play football! I never said Europe is not best! But when it comes to world cup nobody gives fcuk to your best European ego 🙏
Is there any country that has won the world Cup and hasn't won Euro in Europe ? But I am sure there are countries that won the Euro but haven't won the world because it is harder to win.
This is still going on 😂? How can a tournament without Brazil and Argentina be harder to win? And that’s discarding a team like Uruguay, which isn’t historically worse than a team like England or Spain.
Uruguay has been Irrelevant for 40 years until they had this one off run in 2010... Brazil hasnt won against a big European Topteam at World Cups since 2002. And even then the German Team was just average...
@@jascha2765Germany haven't won against s decent team in the world cup in over 10 years. Italy since 2006 got grouped in two world cups and failed to qualify the following two. Spain have won as many World Cup matches as Iran since the 2010 final. Portugal have been eliminated by non european opposition in the last 3 World Cups.
@@jascha2765 “Brazil hasn’t beaten a european team since 2002” that’s like someone in 1997 saying that Real Madrid hasn’t won the champions league since the 1960s. Teams go through ups and downs
@@jascha2765Spain was irrelevant for most of its history... and after 2012 they've gone back to being mostly irrelevant. England despite all the media attention they get have been irrelevant since 1966. Neither of those two teams is historically better than Uruguay.
@@jascha2765 😂 😂 Let me use the same dumb logic you used. According to you, the only "relevant" European teams in 50 years have been all the world cup winners and Holland. Those are Germany, Italy, France, and Spain. And even Spain is debatable because I don't think they've even gone past the quarterfinals other than their 2010 win. On the other hand, Brazil went to three straight finals from '94 to '02. And by any measure, the only teams that have been more successful than them since '02 are the world cup winners. And during that time, Brazil are the only team to have made the quarters every single time. I won't bother mention Argentina.
Portugal lost to Iceland then drew with 2 trash teams , finished 3rd in group stage still went on to win Euros 2016 by pure luck lol World Cup is way tougher .. Penaldo fans holding on to stupid arguments lmao
Media always works for penaldo, they are trying to downplay World Cup once Messi won it but when he didn’t win it they all said it was the biggest and hardest trophy to win
Just proves how media works and promotes CR7, they are now trying to downplay the World Cup once Messi won it but when he didn’t win it they used to say it was the biggest and hardest trophy to win 😂😂😂
People need to use more co-related arguments. Europe Have The Bigger events than south America. South America have always had and still have the best talents and talents is what I know win trophies.. better yet Uruguay is the first country to even won the world cup. 😂
@@andrewblue7067 Messi, Naymar Vini, Rodrygo, Alvarez, lautaro. Not even to mention these young upcoming Brazilian talents. And dont even bother going back into history. Bro relax 🥱😭
Morocco eliminated Spain and Portugal, Argentina eliminated Netherlands and France.Italy didnt make it to World Cup and Germany eliminated in group stage.This is the example.Crazy to compare Euro to World Cup.wth
Funny how idiots reason by anecdotes and genuinely believe they have made a point. OK let me try your dumb take using the previous World Cup: France beat Argentina and Uruguay in the KO stage while Belgium knocked Brazil out. This must prove that Brazil and Argentina are weaker than Euro teams. Pretty low IQ reasonning.
Morocco had a lucky run. Their style was destructive and defensive. It will never happen again...like Turkey and South Corea will never happen again in the WC-semis.
@@andrekoerber7334 I don't know about never but clearly this does not happen often. If I'm not mistaken, only 3 non European/South American teams ever made the semis. So on average it's once every 30 years.
This is even a joke that they're trying so hard to make a debate out of this.. WC is the most biggest prestigious and coveted prize in the game, it's miles better than Euros.. The admin needs to be fired, and all those who said Euros is even close to WC needs to be jailed for 10 years
@@sean-e-boy what tougher teams?? So arrogant like pReMieR leAguE fans Brazil, Argentina and Uruguay are top footballing nations Even some strong African teams cause problems in the WC
The point they are making is that the group stages are harder in Euros than in the World Cup, as you have many times 3 of the top 10 teams in the same group, while the groups of death in World Cup would be classified as easy groups in Euros. But the fact that most 3rd place teams are making it out has watered down this point.
France drew with a terrible Canada team, where are the millions of comments saying France are an overrated mediocre team? Because you know if England had drew with Canada there would be millions of comments about how overhyped England are.
Terrible? This is probably the best Canada team in history. Also, this is a friendly, these games are used as experiments to see what works snd what doesn't. Players don't try too hard because you can't risk getting injured before the euros. Warm up games aren't competitive games. It's very unlikely France would leave Mbappe on the bench in a competitive game.
Ronaldo fans are probably having a field day now 😂 they're the only ones who are delusionally saying Euros is better than WC becuz Ronaldo can't even score a goal in the KO stages in WC😂
Why you bringing up Ronaldo you clown, Ronaldo has nothing to do with this....Mbappe is what started this stupid debate...and they are twisting what he said
@@KuldeepSingh-ek2si They said that before the Euro's became a tournament where you can finish 3rd in your group and still potentially qualify. Also, CR said the world cup is harder.
It used to be more difficult to win the Euro until 2012 but after that it has been more difficult to win the WC ............... because of 24 participants the Euro lost its former competitiveness.
This is the most outrageous question i have ever heard. My opinion is that this stems from the Ronaldo/Messi Debate since so many people love to state that Ronaldo should be that Goat. I am going to explain VERY SIMPLY why the World Cup is harder without A DOUBT! Euro Winners that are not considered WORLD CHAMPIONS.....- Denmark, Greece, Czech Republic, Russia, (Netherlands, Portugal) Last 2 being the best of that group. Reason # 1 WORLD CUP CHAMPIONS - 8 TEAMS! Argentina Brazil France Germany Italy Spain England Uruguay Reason #2 Brazil is considered the BEST TEAM IN FOOTBALL HISTORY! With Players like PELE, (Goat), Ronaldinho, R9, Neymar, Rivaldo, Garincha, list is ENDLESS. Argentina with MESSI, Maradona (2 MORE GOATS), Crespo, Batistuta, Tevez, Aguero, Alvarez, Di Maria, List goes ON! Lets not even discuss Uruguay, who have had players like Forlan, Suarez, Cavani, Valverde, and many more. Dont forget Forlan was tied for most goals for the 2010 WC and James Rodriguez who is from Colombia btw had the most goals for the 2014 WC. This is like saying Lets host the Basketball World Championship and NOT Include USA. Thats the same thing as NOT including Brazil. Reason #3 (The 4 GOATS of the Sport) (Messi, Maradona, Pele, Ronaldo). But Yes the EURO IS WAY HARDER THEN THE WC when the best players in HISTORY DONT EVEN PLAY IN THE EURO!!!
Lol Europe has a losing record vs S.America (-11 games), do they think it's easier to win wars with the USA since we own them in war and always beat them? 😂😅🤣
I am a Ramsdale fan. Mr Hislop is not wrong on Rambo as his 3rd choice. He is 3rd because he was on the bench and not playing for his club. In the current situation if he is not playing for his club, he should be :rd choice. Example: Maguire with England. If he is not playing for MU, he should not be playing for England. I do remember that Mr Burley and Mr Nicol said this.
Qualifying for WC is more difficult than qualifying for Euros but when it comes to the actual tournaments it evens out. After group stages, Italy had to beat Austria, Belgium ,Spain and England to win last Euros. Argentina had to beat Australia, Netherlands, Kroatia and France to win last WC. I couldn't say one run was more difficult than the other.
Italy euro 2020 opponents ranking- Turkey (29), Switzerland (13), Wales (17), Austria (23), Belgium (1), Spain (6), England (4) - average ranking = 13.3 Argentina 2022 WC Campaign - Saudi (51), Poland (26), Mexico (13) , Australia (38), Netherlands (8), Croatia (12) , France (4) - average ranking = 21.7 (Not taking credit for this)
Yeah it's not even close. In this Euro 2024 there are 4 matches between top 10 ranked nations in the group stages alone. There are no such matches in the group stages of the Copa and there was only 1 match at the WC 2022 (Croatia vs Belgium). The hype with Argentina and Brazil is real - they get so many ranking points playing against worse teams on average than the UEFA nations.
Pochettino couldn't even win Ligue 1 with Neymar, Mbappe and Messi. Why is he still held in such high regard?? He's like a modern day Rafa Benitez except he won the UCL.
lets be honest if the euros included brazil argentina , that would by far be the best tournament, uruguay real candidate to. Also many people saying 'italy didnt qualify' blah blah blah, but thats the point, if italy didnt qualify it shows the diffcult of the european qualification process. You cant be saying the teams like saudi and iran are better than italy, even when italy dont play well.
Shaka totally correct on Ramsdale plus Ramsdale hiding in the shadows all season, any self respecting professional soccer player would have demanded an immediate transfer
Shaka is right. You don't need to play the game of football the way the best teams play it. Modern football doesn't win all the trophies in the world. In fact Modern football - possession / high press / geggenpressing - has a quite awful record relatively speaking of winning in CUP COMPETITIONS. It only dominates in leagues where week in week out you play inferior opposition who can't spend like you do. Real Madrid who have won the last 100 UCL finals have done so defending deep and hitting on the counter. France did the same at the 2018 World Cup. Argentina did no, but they had a player called Messi playing for them. Defensive, counter attacking football is perfectly fine for most teams to play. The US have this false idea about becoming a world power of football, but the reality is that they have about 4 - 5 other sports that get all their best athletes first. It will never happen. Forget about it. Accept who you are and play in a way that ensures you are in the game and might even win. Possession football isn't that.
Love that from Craig. It irritated me so much when Shaka kept talking about Ramsdale/Raya early on. He's right about the selection, but he needs that bashing from Craig still
Yah man because a stupid player what happen to be the best player in his generation allegedly brought this stupid issue up. The issue is so stupid that the media still wondering why he said a such stupid thing. And you guys want to criticize Martinez because of his gesture toward stupid mbape. He is always undermining other countries competition... stupid ninja turtle
It's funny how these thing work. Mbappe dissed South American football then he goes and loses to a South American country in the world cup final. He will probably lose the golden ball to a South American player in Vinicius Jr.
I don`t think so....neither Mbappe nor Vinicius deserve the Balon D`Or. Before the 2022 WC Neymar wore the brazilian Shirt with 6 stars on it...and then the chickens said good bye in the quarter finals.
1. Compare the rank of "worst" national team in world cup and of euros. 2. In euro you dont have a easy run, even in the group stage any team can beat you, because these is no bad ranked team . Whereas in world cup you have reserves spot for asian and african teams and we know how good is their rank. 3. Don't tell me " south korea beat spain and germany" i am talking about the overall competition, do you think any other asian team could beat the european giants. Whereas in the euros even the lowest ranked team(s) can create upset(s). 4. Italy and netherlands could not qualify for 2018 world cup, because they had to compete against the european teams to qualify, which are very tough to compete against. Only if netherland and italy had to qualify against the african and asian teams, they would have surely played the 2018 world cup. 5. You would say "qualifying for the world cup is tough''. For those how compete against top dogs to qualify not for those like Qatar how got a spot just because they hosted the world cup.
@@abhayangaria4766Very bad argument. First you talk about upsets and then say not to include south korea or japan🤣🤣. Even without considering those Morocco knocked two European powerhouses. And don't say the grp stage is hard when a team can qualify without winning a single game.
Any team in the euros can win it the overall quality of Teams is better then the World Cup. I’m Australian and the teams we need to play to get into the World Cup is a joke
Ya'll beat Denmark and you are saying any team from the Euros can win the World Cup? I guess by that logic Georgia and Albania can win the World cup lol.
Half of the teams that qualify for the World Cup wouldn't be good enough to qualify for the Euros, which ultimately means the Euros is harder to win. If anyone can make a case for Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Iran and Wales being good enough, then i'd change my mind.
Definitely WC is mote harder than European championships....Rem we have Brazil n Argentina for South America teams...plus nowadays Asia n Africa teams r no longer pushover...rem how Japan defeat Spain n German, n Morocco all e way to semi-final....maybe some Central America teams r weaker...but overall WC is harder to win
i dont understand the logic for the euros being harder than the world cup? the most important games happen in the quarterfinals and on anyway. if Europe is so good, then all 8 spots should go to European nations in the world cup anyway right? So you would just have the euros quarterfinals taking place in the world cup. and if European nations aren't good enough, then you have the best of other regions taking spots in the final 8, which means that the nations in the final 8 at that point are at a higher level than the euros quarterfinals. it just doesn't make sense because it's not like the world cup only allows 4 European nations to participate or something and European nations ranked 5 to 16 are just better than every other nation in the world.
There was a time that the Euro was more difficult to win. That was like 10 years ago. The latter stages is packed with elite teams.Therefore every round starting the round of 16 is a very difficult fixture unlike in the WC. That us where this question comes from.
Just look at the fact that Brasil and Argentine managed to win several world cups but could never win the euros.. and then think again about the question !
Both r easy if u have referee on your side as did messi and argentina with daniele orsatto...spanish quarterfinal referee and final referee from poland who gave free penalties for argentina..this time perhaps they can give free penalties for england 🎉🎉
1. The world cup is way more prestigious. 2. Euro winners are less predictable. 3. Which is more difficult to win? That's subjective and based on your personal opinions.
I don't know. One thing I know is I like watching Euro, much more than watching Copa America. Watching WC for is just like watching Euro while adding Brazil and Argentina as guests, that's all.
If you want a smooth and hassle free transition through Toronto Pearson, you should consider not carrying any check-in baggage at all. It's bonkers. I doubt that the airline had much to do with Burley's golf clubs being in the limbo
Euro used to be more difficult to win when there were only 16 teams and u simply had no easy draw, while at world cups you mostly have 4-5 games of time to get into rhythm
Greece won it when it was 16 teams. And even when there where fewer 8 teams Denmark won the Euros after being on holiday after yugoslavia was kicked out. Whilst no weak country's have won the world cup
Copa America is even harder than Euros..Copa America have the most fiercest rivalries, intensity and harsh climatic atmospheres unlike the chickens in Euros
@@sean-e-boy Andorra, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, England, Slovenia, Slovakia, Faroe Islands?? 🤣😭😭 I'd take the Asian cup over these pathetic teams not even on the world map 😂
Is that why the super team Chile won it twice? Chile could never win the euros twice in a row. Copa America only has Brazil, Argentina, and Uruguay. Kinda boring compared to the euros
1. Compare the rank of "worst" national team in world cup and of euros. 2. In euro you dont have a easy run, even in the group stage any team can beat you, because these is no bad ranked team . Whereas in world cup you have reserves spot for asian and african teams and we know how good is their rank. 3. Don't tell me " south korea beat spain and germany" i am talking about the overall competition, do you think any other asian team could beat the european giants. Whereas in the euros even the lowest ranked team(s) can create upset(s). 4. Italy and netherlands could not qualify for 2018 world cup, because they had to compete against the european teams to qualify, which are very tough to compete against. Only if netherland and italy had to qualify against the african and asian teams, they would have surely played the 2018 world cup. 5. You would say "qualifying for the world cup is tough''. For those how compete against top dogs to qualify not for those like Qatar how got a spot just because they hosted the world cup.
Put this England against Columbia or Ecuador. Saka will limp into retirement and rest 10 will be on stretchers. Ffs France is Africa united. Only European teams that are good are Spain, Germany(until they face Asian team) and Portugal(until they face Morocco).
Italy 4 times champion???...Argentina 3 times champion: 1978 bought by the Military gouvernment, 1986 la mano de dios, 2022 FIFA-pity with Messi. Brazil 2022 with the help of the referees (versus Turkey and Belgium). South Americans just cannot lose.
Some of those 'exotic' teams turned your former Eurocup Champs into a joke. Japan won over Germany and Spain. South Korea won over Portugal Tunisia won over France Australia won over Denmark Morocco won over Belgium AND sent home both Spain and Porgual aswell. The disrespect is surreal, all of sudden Europeans lost the WC crown and now they try to push this overly ridiculous narrative. Not to mention that Greece's best result ever in a WC is going throug group stage as second, only to be embarrased by Colombia. Also, France just had a draw against Canada. Is Canada an exotic team too? All of you casuals that think that a Eurocup is more competitive than a World Cup should start watching another sport, idk, tennis or cricket.
Of course a european championchip is harder to win, because ANY team can at least play decent. Football in Europe is on a different level then in the rest of the world.
If worldcup is hosted in south American countries it's impossible for Europe teams to win it due to weather conditions and pitches which makes south Americans are greatest teams
It's a pretty obvious reply regarding the comparison between the World cup and European championship. Before it's expansion, it was the European championship, of course. Brazil and Argentina are true greats of football but there's a lot of dross to make up for on the World scene.
The euro winners didn't even qualify for the world cup 😂😂
You do know they played against other European teams also it was a completely different team
Yes, but you have to play European teams to qualify, which proves the point even more that European teams are stronger
To the two comments above me, the question isn’t which continent has the strongest teams, but which competition is harder to win. The answer is the World Cup. Nobody cares who Italy lost to; the point is simply qualifying to the World Cup is already harder than the Euros, let alone the actual tournaments.
@@Attacker456 Exactly, not many Asian, African and N.American teams will be in the 32 teams if we put the WC qualification match in only one group like Copa qualifying, 1 to 32 in order. Lol 😂
@@Ararimu9 so?
Cmon guys. Italy won the last Euro and haven’t really been relevant since. It’s the World Cup
Where was the argument or point you made here? There is none
Italy won the world cup in 2006 then did nothing for 15 years, it's the Euros
@@Fmfcg what??? 😂 Didn't they just win the Euros?? 😂😂
Are you a clown?? like saying Saudi league is better than pReMieR leAguE 😂
@@Triple_X_X 2006 + 15 years = 2021 Euros, keep up
@@Fmfcgsaying they did nothing in 15 years for italy is still achieved more than most nations
But we’ve seen an underdog win the euros aka Greece 2004 but no underdog has ever won the World Cup
But we have seen plenty of giant killing in World Cups, especially in the last one. Morocco and Japan shocked a lot of people by beating international champions like Spain and Germany. Seeing Saudi upset Argentina was shocking. Reminds me of when Senegal went on it's great run in 2002. Those are the moments that make the World Cup special
@@disgraced101sure but not win, World Cup winners are usually 4 European teams and 2 South American teams. Germany, Spain, Italy, France, Brazil, Argentina. Those are the 6 countries who are always in contention to win in the World Cup
Uruguay were the underdogs when they won the 1950 World Cup. West Germany were the *MASSIVE* underdogs when they defeated Hungary in the 1954 World Cup final.
Greece won 2004 Euro and didn't qualify for 2006 World Cup.
Italy won 2020 Euro and didn't qualify for 2022 World Cup.
Chile won 2015 & 2016 Copa America and didn't qualify for 2018 World Cup
@@lonelyboy1977 That’s not true, there’s a difference between being less than favorites than an absolute underdog like Greece that parked the bus in every game in 2004.
Brazil were favorites in 1950 but that doesn’t mean that Uruguay were absolute underdogs, Uruguay had just won the first World Cup and two pre-world cup Olympic tournaments, so that’s not an underdog to me. West Germany wasn’t an underdog either, they had some good players and had been on good form the past couple of years. They didn’t park the bus like Greece did and they kept winning subsequent trophies after 1954 which is not the case with Greece, Greece disappeared after that 2004 euro win
How is this even a question??
It’s not…
WC miles better, it's the biggest prestigious and coveted prize in the game
Because South Americans are shameless & can't accept reality.
Because South Americans are shameless
Because certain people on certain Southern continents, have a hard time excepting reality
Asking this like a European team won the last World Cup 😂
argentina was first non euro nation to win world cup in 20 years
@@DonQwantsyouTrue but before that it was all south american dominance
@@Blue-ik8ijhow so? Europe has 12 world cups and South America has 10
Europe. England Spain. Germany Italy France all won a world cup. Only Brazil Argentina and Uruguay have won a world cup in South America. Europe is stronger
@@Blue-ik8ij 😄😆😂🤣
How is this a question? The top goal scorer in Euro history has 0 g+a in WC KNOCKOUTS😂😂😂 It's not even a debate man😂
This is a thing because Messi won the World Cup. It’s crazy how they are always moving the goal post. At one point Mbappe was on the verge of winning back to back world cups and the entire Euro centric media was about to anoint him as the “greatest ever.” Denmark, Greece and Portugal are all Euro winners so why haven’t they won a World Cup? It took Spain what, 100 years to win a World Cup. Europeans are just robotic football players with no flair, passion of play and natural skills.
Germans beg to differ.
Flair and magic yes. Before someone say ohh zidane, platini or cr7 beg to differ, stop it that flair and creativity is at birth in the gene code of Brazilian, Argentinian, Uruguay, Chilean, Colombian. But to say no passion of play, or natural skill is as crazy as saying the euro is harder than the World Cup.
Thank God France didn’t win that World Cup in 2022, we would have never heard the end of “ mbappe is the next pele”
@@edwinborja3570 best football player always none European prove Pele Maradona real Ronaldo Messi their natural talent were develope by football culture unlike European robotic system
@@davidotto9216you sound like a kid when you make comments like "real Ronaldo". So Cr7 was made in a lab or was he cloned frol R9?
How is this even a question
Euros harder? WORLD CHAMPIONS Argentina last 5 competitive games vs European teams, 5 wins, 0 losses. That included a 3-0 win vs the reigning European champions btw...
How convenient that you picked the one WC where a South American team won. The previous winner, France would also have beaten every Latin American team and did beat Argentina. So not sure what your point us.
Point is stop acting like Europe is everything! @@BlunderCity
@@dilenmagar6812by stats alone, Europe is the best foootballing continent on the planet
@@claudemakelele2856 i repeat Europe is not the only continent to play football! I never said Europe is not best! But when it comes to world cup nobody gives fcuk to your best European ego 🙏
Europe dominated the World Cup for the last 20 years.
Is there any country that has won the world Cup and hasn't won Euro in Europe ?
But I am sure there are countries that won the Euro but haven't won the world because it is harder to win.
England
England has won the World Cup but has never won the euros
@@wamnicho France, Germany, Spain and Italy are the only big teams in Europe
@@Triple_X_X the question was what country in Europe won the World Cup but not the euros not who is the biggest in europe
Italy and Germany 4 world cups, 3 and 2 Euros
What a stupid question….
More difficult for who?
This is still going on 😂? How can a tournament without Brazil and Argentina be harder to win? And that’s discarding a team like Uruguay, which isn’t historically worse than a team like England or Spain.
Uruguay has been Irrelevant for 40 years until they had this one off run in 2010...
Brazil hasnt won against a big European Topteam at World Cups since 2002. And even then the German Team was just average...
@@jascha2765Germany haven't won against s decent team in the world cup in over 10 years. Italy since 2006 got grouped in two world cups and failed to qualify the following two. Spain have won as many World Cup matches as Iran since the 2010 final. Portugal have been eliminated by non european opposition in the last 3 World Cups.
@@jascha2765 “Brazil hasn’t beaten a european team since 2002” that’s like someone in 1997 saying that Real Madrid hasn’t won the champions league since the 1960s. Teams go through ups and downs
@@jascha2765Spain was irrelevant for most of its history... and after 2012 they've gone back to being mostly irrelevant. England despite all the media attention they get have been irrelevant since 1966. Neither of those two teams is historically better than Uruguay.
@@jascha2765 😂 😂 Let me use the same dumb logic you used. According to you, the only "relevant" European teams in 50 years have been all the world cup winners and Holland. Those are Germany, Italy, France, and Spain. And even Spain is debatable because I don't think they've even gone past the quarterfinals other than their 2010 win.
On the other hand, Brazil went to three straight finals from '94 to '02. And by any measure, the only teams that have been more successful than them since '02 are the world cup winners. And during that time, Brazil are the only team to have made the quarters every single time. I won't bother mention Argentina.
Spain can answer that question , 2 Euros 1 World Cup
3 euros
Italy has 4 world cups and only 2 Euros
Although I agree with you, this isn’t really a valid argument. Germany got more WCs, so does England and Italy.
@@spiritual84 WC better
Spain have 3 euros bro
Portugal lost to Iceland then drew with 2 trash teams , finished 3rd in group stage still went on to win Euros 2016 by pure luck lol World Cup is way tougher .. Penaldo fans holding on to stupid arguments lmao
Media always works for penaldo, they are trying to downplay World Cup once Messi won it but when he didn’t win it they all said it was the biggest and hardest trophy to win
Seethe and cope. 5 pens btw.
@@treyyg-rt5kz Won't stop you plastics from Bangladesh from crying about it. Forever rent-free.
@@SLSAMG You're the one who's literally seething and coping. 🤦♂
@@JuanSeba90 Yeah run along and support your local cricket club mate.
Craig and Shaka are always entertaining 😂😂
Just proves how media works and promotes CR7, they are now trying to downplay the World Cup once Messi won it but when he didn’t win it they used to say it was the biggest and hardest trophy to win 😂😂😂
I agree this is thru. 👍😂😂
Seethe and cope.
Xavi said this in 2012
Mbappe started this now
But it's all because of Ronaldo right ? 😭💀
@@SLSAMG That's what CR fans have done since the world cup. 😁
@@JuanSeba90 Yeah apparently not only is Ronaldo living rent-free, I am too. Condolences, lad :)
A man with brains knows that if euros were better than world cup , why Brazil, Argentina and Uruguay have world cups... just explain it to me😂😂🤣🤣🤣
U.S. beating England in 1950 World Cup is the equivalent of U.S. beating Pakistan in cricket
I tought that there isnt such a thing as a stupid question.i was wrong
Very wrong
People need to use more co-related arguments. Europe Have The Bigger events than south America. South America have always had and still have the best talents and talents is what I know win trophies.. better yet Uruguay is the first country to even won the world cup. 😂
How does South America have better talents? That’s a ridiculous statement.
@@andrewblue7067 Messi, Naymar Vini, Rodrygo, Alvarez, lautaro. Not even to mention these young upcoming Brazilian talents. And dont even bother going back into history. Bro relax 🥱😭
Europe has better talents easily. Can't even think of that many South American talents these days
@@trephix Europe?? You mean Africans? 😂
@@trephixAll the talents in Europe are all Africans 😂
To the cricket question, Iceland beating England at the Euros
Nah iceland was much bigger Pakistan aren't out
sheriff beating real Madrid in UCL, that's maybe the closest!!!👍
The USA team is madee up of indian , Pakistani , New Zealand and Australia immigrants, traditional cricket powerhouse
I like the Saudi vs Argentina analogy, though Pakistan are nowhere near Argentina's level
@@abg6461or maybe alcoyano in 20/21. Cause they weren’t full time footballers
Why is the Euro even relevant? There is already a World Cup!
Morocco eliminated Spain and Portugal, Argentina eliminated Netherlands and France.Italy didnt make it to World Cup and Germany eliminated in group stage.This is the example.Crazy to compare Euro to World Cup.wth
😂
Tell them
Funny how idiots reason by anecdotes and genuinely believe they have made a point.
OK let me try your dumb take using the previous World Cup:
France beat Argentina and Uruguay in the KO stage while Belgium knocked Brazil out. This must prove that Brazil and Argentina are weaker than Euro teams.
Pretty low IQ reasonning.
Morocco had a lucky run. Their style was destructive and defensive. It will never happen again...like Turkey and South Corea will never happen again in the WC-semis.
@@andrekoerber7334
I don't know about never but clearly this does not happen often. If I'm not mistaken, only 3 non European/South American teams ever made the semis. So on average it's once every 30 years.
@@andrekoerber7334Only lucky when non-european teams do this
This is even a joke that they're trying so hard to make a debate out of this..
WC is the most biggest prestigious and coveted prize in the game, it's miles better than Euros..
The admin needs to be fired, and all those who said Euros is even close to WC needs to be jailed for 10 years
That sentence is far too low for my approval!
It's more hyped it's not better. Euro competition is tougher teams knockout games are more difficult.
@@sean-e-boy what tougher teams?? So arrogant like pReMieR leAguE fans
Brazil, Argentina and Uruguay are top footballing nations
Even some strong African teams cause problems in the WC
The point they are making is that the group stages are harder in Euros than in the World Cup, as you have many times 3 of the top 10 teams in the same group, while the groups of death in World Cup would be classified as easy groups in Euros.
But the fact that most 3rd place teams are making it out has watered down this point.
@@20eNe24 😂😂😂😂 WC CLEAR 20 times
France drew with a terrible Canada team, where are the millions of comments saying France are an overrated mediocre team? Because you know if England had drew with Canada there would be millions of comments about how overhyped England are.
Terrible? This is probably the best Canada team in history. Also, this is a friendly, these games are used as experiments to see what works snd what doesn't. Players don't try too hard because you can't risk getting injured before the euros. Warm up games aren't competitive games. It's very unlikely France would leave Mbappe on the bench in a competitive game.
@@BlunderCityso England's defeat to Iceland is irrelevant then
France has achieved much more than England in recent history. England still has to prove themselves.
Lol best isnt saying much those. Canada also got trashed 4-0 by Holland last week @BlunderCity
Friendlies are friendlies and tournament games are very different.
Ronaldo fans are probably having a field day now 😂 they're the only ones who are delusionally saying Euros is better than WC becuz Ronaldo can't even score a goal in the KO stages in WC😂
Why you bringing up Ronaldo you clown, Ronaldo has nothing to do with this....Mbappe is what started this stupid debate...and they are twisting what he said
He was crying at the last one.
Seek therapy
Don't think xavi nd Zidane are Ronaldo fanboys
@@KuldeepSingh-ek2si They said that before the Euro's became a tournament where you can finish 3rd in your group and still potentially qualify. Also, CR said the world cup is harder.
It used to be more difficult to win the Euro until 2012 but after that it has been more difficult to win the WC ............... because of 24 participants the Euro lost its former competitiveness.
This is the most outrageous question i have ever heard. My opinion is that this stems from the Ronaldo/Messi Debate since so many people love to state that Ronaldo should be that Goat. I am going to explain VERY SIMPLY why the World Cup is harder without A DOUBT!
Euro Winners that are not considered WORLD CHAMPIONS.....- Denmark, Greece, Czech Republic, Russia, (Netherlands, Portugal) Last 2 being the best of that group.
Reason # 1
WORLD CUP CHAMPIONS - 8 TEAMS!
Argentina
Brazil
France
Germany
Italy
Spain
England
Uruguay
Reason #2
Brazil is considered the BEST TEAM IN FOOTBALL HISTORY! With Players like PELE, (Goat), Ronaldinho, R9, Neymar, Rivaldo, Garincha, list is ENDLESS.
Argentina with MESSI, Maradona (2 MORE GOATS), Crespo, Batistuta, Tevez, Aguero, Alvarez, Di Maria, List goes ON!
Lets not even discuss Uruguay, who have had players like Forlan, Suarez, Cavani, Valverde, and many more. Dont forget Forlan was tied for most goals for the 2010 WC and James Rodriguez who is from Colombia btw had the most goals for the 2014 WC.
This is like saying Lets host the Basketball World Championship and NOT Include USA. Thats the same thing as NOT including Brazil.
Reason #3 (The 4 GOATS of the Sport) (Messi, Maradona, Pele, Ronaldo).
But Yes the EURO IS WAY HARDER THEN THE WC when the best players in HISTORY DONT EVEN PLAY IN THE EURO!!!
Lol Europe has a losing record vs S.America (-11 games), do they think it's easier to win wars with the USA since we own them in war and always beat them? 😂😅🤣
I am a Ramsdale fan. Mr Hislop is not wrong on Rambo as his 3rd choice. He is 3rd because he was on the bench and not playing for his club. In the current situation if he is not playing for his club, he should be :rd choice. Example: Maguire with England. If he is not playing for MU, he should not be playing for England. I do remember that Mr Burley and Mr Nicol said this.
Qualifying for WC is more difficult than qualifying for Euros but when it comes to the actual tournaments it evens out. After group stages, Italy had to beat Austria, Belgium ,Spain and England to win last Euros. Argentina had to beat Australia, Netherlands, Kroatia and France to win last WC. I couldn't say one run was more difficult than the other.
So now people started judging based on one team's route😆😆
@@hosnaarabanani3004 well, yeah?! your point?
Is this a serious question?
Italy euro 2020 opponents ranking- Turkey (29), Switzerland (13), Wales (17), Austria (23), Belgium (1), Spain (6), England (4) - average ranking = 13.3
Argentina 2022 WC Campaign - Saudi (51), Poland (26), Mexico (13) , Australia (38), Netherlands (8), Croatia (12) , France (4) - average ranking = 21.7
(Not taking credit for this)
Yeah it's not even close. In this Euro 2024 there are 4 matches between top 10 ranked nations in the group stages alone.
There are no such matches in the group stages of the Copa and there was only 1 match at the WC 2022 (Croatia vs Belgium).
The hype with Argentina and Brazil is real - they get so many ranking points playing against worse teams on average than the UEFA nations.
Kelleher is nowhere near ramsdale level and thats not even a debate.... its close between ortega and ramsdale but kelleher is terrible
Kelleher has won wayyyy more trophies than ramsdale could ever imagine.
Kelleher clear. Ramsdale got the bozo gene
@@tsimoi273Kelleher's lack of concentration is why Scousepool was knocked out of two tournaments this year
Pochettino couldn't even win Ligue 1 with Neymar, Mbappe and Messi. Why is he still held in such high regard?? He's like a modern day Rafa Benitez except he won the UCL.
lets be honest if the euros included brazil argentina , that would by far be the best tournament, uruguay real candidate to. Also many people saying 'italy didnt qualify' blah blah blah, but thats the point, if italy didnt qualify it shows the diffcult of the european qualification process. You cant be saying the teams like saudi and iran are better than italy, even when italy dont play well.
Italy literally lost to North Mecadonia.
That's what Europeans call hard?😂😂
I have a feeling Ronaldo paid mbappe to say this 😂
Good joke😂😂😂
Shaka totally correct on Ramsdale plus Ramsdale hiding in the shadows all season, any self respecting professional soccer player would have demanded an immediate transfer
Shaka is right. You don't need to play the game of football the way the best teams play it. Modern football doesn't win all the trophies in the world. In fact Modern football - possession / high press / geggenpressing - has a quite awful record relatively speaking of winning in CUP COMPETITIONS. It only dominates in leagues where week in week out you play inferior opposition who can't spend like you do. Real Madrid who have won the last 100 UCL finals have done so defending deep and hitting on the counter. France did the same at the 2018 World Cup. Argentina did no, but they had a player called Messi playing for them. Defensive, counter attacking football is perfectly fine for most teams to play. The US have this false idea about becoming a world power of football, but the reality is that they have about 4 - 5 other sports that get all their best athletes first. It will never happen. Forget about it. Accept who you are and play in a way that ensures you are in the game and might even win. Possession football isn't that.
Wrong analysis....
Love that from Craig. It irritated me so much when Shaka kept talking about Ramsdale/Raya early on.
He's right about the selection, but he needs that bashing from Craig still
The most stupid question i have ever heard, my answer is none, ligue 1 is the hardest 😊
Yah man because a stupid player what happen to be the best player in his generation allegedly brought this stupid issue up. The issue is so stupid that the media still wondering why he said a such stupid thing. And you guys want to criticize Martinez because of his gesture toward stupid mbape. He is always undermining other countries competition... stupid ninja turtle
euro is way more competitive than world cup, apart from brazil and argentina.
It's funny how these thing work. Mbappe dissed South American football then he goes and loses to a South American country in the world cup final. He will probably lose the golden ball to a South American player in Vinicius Jr.
@CR-91637 He made a point, but he didn't state a fact. The results prove it.
I don`t think so....neither Mbappe nor Vinicius deserve the Balon D`Or.
Before the 2022 WC Neymar wore the brazilian Shirt with 6 stars on it...and then the chickens said good bye in the quarter finals.
It won't make any difference to engerland,the haven't won anything since dodgy 66"
Are you guys serious? A lot of European teams wouldn't even make the world cup if they had to qualify in Conmebol
1. Compare the rank of "worst" national team in world cup and of euros.
2. In euro you dont have a easy run, even in the group stage any team can beat you, because these is no bad ranked team . Whereas in world cup you have reserves spot for asian and african teams and we know how good is their rank.
3. Don't tell me " south korea beat spain and germany" i am talking about the overall competition, do you think any other asian team could beat the european giants.
Whereas in the euros even the lowest ranked team(s) can create upset(s).
4. Italy and netherlands could not qualify for 2018 world cup, because they had to compete against the european teams to qualify, which are very tough to compete against.
Only if netherland and italy had to qualify against the african and asian teams, they would have surely played the 2018 world cup.
5. You would say "qualifying for the world cup is tough''.
For those how compete against top dogs to qualify not for those like Qatar how got a spot just because they hosted the world cup.
@@abhayangaria4766Very bad argument.
First you talk about upsets and then say not to include south korea or japan🤣🤣.
Even without considering those Morocco knocked two European powerhouses.
And don't say the grp stage is hard when a team can qualify without winning a single game.
Any team in the euros can win it the overall quality of Teams is better then the World Cup.
I’m Australian and the teams we need to play to get into the World Cup is a joke
Ya'll beat Denmark and you are saying any team from the Euros can win the World Cup? I guess by that logic Georgia and Albania can win the World cup lol.
Half of the teams that qualify for the World Cup wouldn't be good enough to qualify for the Euros, which ultimately means the Euros is harder to win. If anyone can make a case for Saudi Arabia, Qatar, Iran and Wales being good enough, then i'd change my mind.
Keep being delusional when ur European teams gets knocked out by Morocco and Euro champions get thrashed by Argentina.
To think a tournament is easier without Argentina and Brazil Uruguay and harder with Andorra Lichtenstein and farroe islands is just… well.
Definitely WC is mote harder than European championships....Rem we have Brazil n Argentina for South America teams...plus nowadays Asia n Africa teams r no longer pushover...rem how Japan defeat Spain n German, n Morocco all e way to semi-final....maybe some Central America teams r weaker...but overall WC is harder to win
i dont understand the logic for the euros being harder than the world cup? the most important games happen in the quarterfinals and on anyway. if Europe is so good, then all 8 spots should go to European nations in the world cup anyway right? So you would just have the euros quarterfinals taking place in the world cup. and if European nations aren't good enough, then you have the best of other regions taking spots in the final 8, which means that the nations in the final 8 at that point are at a higher level than the euros quarterfinals. it just doesn't make sense because it's not like the world cup only allows 4 European nations to participate or something and European nations ranked 5 to 16 are just better than every other nation in the world.
World cup literally has the same teams as Euros plus Argentina and Brazil, how can Euros possibly be harder
Argentina and brazil walk into the euros
Lol OK bud
They usually get knocked out by Europeans in the wc
7-1 😂 , lost to Croatia 22 wc
@@trephix Europeans?? 😂😂 You mean Africans in Europe?? 😂
@@trephix is that why Talents in Europe are mostly Africans? 😂
@@trephix is that why Europe has Afric@n talents? 😂
France couldn't even beat Canada 🤣🤣🤣
There was a time that the Euro was more difficult to win. That was like 10 years ago.
The latter stages is packed with elite teams.Therefore every round starting the round of 16 is a very difficult fixture unlike in the WC.
That us where this question comes from.
It is called the " world cup" for a reason.What a stupid question
There's still a big hole in Mbappe's heart😂
Just look at the fact that Brasil and Argentine managed to win several world cups but could never win the euros.. and then think again about the question !
What would it take to finally boot Southgate?... Well, without Southgate, the WC should be easier than the Euros.
Both r easy if u have referee on your side as did messi and argentina with daniele orsatto...spanish quarterfinal referee and final referee from poland who gave free penalties for argentina..this time perhaps they can give free penalties for england 🎉🎉
Penaldo was given penalties and offside goals when he won his rigged CLs
European teams have only won half of the world cup tournaments and it mostly comes down to two teams (Germany and Italy).
Wc of course
France squad is stacked thats why they feel its easier to win the wc
The cream will rise to the top at the World Cup still. It’s a long journey to the final.
Guess who's back?? Back again?? Craig Burley is back, back again! 😂👍
Nonsense 😤 The world cup is more difficult than the so-called hype euro cup
1. The world cup is way more prestigious. 2. Euro winners are less predictable. 3. Which is more difficult to win? That's subjective and based on your personal opinions.
There's an objective reality here. Your Personal opinion doesn’t alter the reality.
by the time the world cup arrives italy will be ready their youths are super their tactics history shows are unbeatable
Imo this is the third most talented US cycle behind 1999-2002 and 2011-2014
I don't know. One thing I know is I like watching Euro, much more than watching Copa America. Watching WC for is just like watching Euro while adding Brazil and Argentina as guests, that's all.
If you want a smooth and hassle free transition through Toronto Pearson, you should consider not carrying any check-in baggage at all. It's bonkers. I doubt that the airline had much to do with Burley's golf clubs being in the limbo
Gareth Southgate would be a disaster at United.
Euro used to be more difficult to win when there were only 16 teams and u simply had no easy draw, while at world cups you mostly have 4-5 games of time to get into rhythm
You can come third in your group at the euros and still go through. Portugal didn’t win a single game in the group stage at 2016 and went on to win it
Greece won it when it was 16 teams. And even when there where fewer 8 teams Denmark won the Euros after being on holiday after yugoslavia was kicked out. Whilst no weak country's have won the world cup
We need Craig to star in a planes trains and automobiles remake lol
Copa America is even harder than Euros..Copa America have the most fiercest rivalries, intensity and harsh climatic atmospheres unlike the chickens in Euros
You’re smoked out…
Yes climates in USA are so intense 😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
@@sean-e-boy I'm talking about South America ..You picked a nation that would benefit your pathetic comment 😂
@@sean-e-boy Andorra, Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, England, Slovenia, Slovakia, Faroe Islands?? 🤣😭😭
I'd take the Asian cup over these pathetic teams not even on the world map 😂
Is that why the super team Chile won it twice? Chile could never win the euros twice in a row. Copa America only has Brazil, Argentina, and Uruguay. Kinda boring compared to the euros
9:40 Craig speaking facts
Definitely euros, even England won world cup but not euros most elite KO competition after champions league
Ronaldo fans trying to downplay World Cup since Messi won it 😂
@@treyyg-rt5kz no bro
@@treyyg-rt5kz Support your local. 5 pens btw.
@@SLSAMGDefinitely the world cup is now easier since Argentina got 5 penalties😂😂😂
Brilliant argument
Say that when greece wins wc
Mbappe indirectly trolling Pele for wining 3 worldcups despite he has won 1 because of his best team sqaud😂
Let alone the difficulty to qualify for the World Cup! Just ask 2020 euro champion Italy!
1. Compare the rank of "worst" national team in world cup and of euros.
2. In euro you dont have a easy run, even in the group stage any team can beat you, because these is no bad ranked team . Whereas in world cup you have reserves spot for asian and african teams and we know how good is their rank.
3. Don't tell me " south korea beat spain and germany" i am talking about the overall competition, do you think any other asian team could beat the european giants.
Whereas in the euros even the lowest ranked team(s) can create upset(s).
4. Italy and netherlands could not qualify for 2018 world cup, because they had to compete against the european teams to qualify, which are very tough to compete against.
Only if netherland and italy had to qualify against the african and asian teams, they would have surely played the 2018 world cup.
5. You would say "qualifying for the world cup is tough''.
For those how compete against top dogs to qualify not for those like Qatar how got a spot just because they hosted the world cup.
Very nice essay to satisfy yourself
Put this England against Columbia or Ecuador. Saka will limp into retirement and rest 10 will be on stretchers. Ffs France is Africa united. Only European teams that are good are Spain, Germany(until they face Asian team) and Portugal(until they face Morocco).
Italy 4 times champion???...Argentina 3 times champion: 1978 bought by the Military gouvernment, 1986 la mano de dios, 2022 FIFA-pity with Messi. Brazil 2022 with the help of the referees (versus Turkey and Belgium). South Americans just cannot lose.
Ronaldo the Luxenberg man😂
5 dubious pens btw. it will forever be a tournament won with an asterisk on it.
@@SLSAMG *For CR7 fans and those who can't deal with the fact Argentina won it.
@@JuanSeba90 You about done? Definitely struck a nerve with you
If Euros are harder than how come Ronaldo can score there and win but can’t score in a World Cup Knockout game 🫢🫢🫢
Some of those 'exotic' teams turned your former Eurocup Champs into a joke.
Japan won over Germany and Spain.
South Korea won over Portugal
Tunisia won over France
Australia won over Denmark
Morocco won over Belgium AND sent home both Spain and Porgual aswell.
The disrespect is surreal, all of sudden Europeans lost the WC crown and now they try to push this overly ridiculous narrative.
Not to mention that Greece's best result ever in a WC is going throug group stage as second, only to be embarrased by Colombia.
Also, France just had a draw against Canada. Is Canada an exotic team too?
All of you casuals that think that a Eurocup is more competitive than a World Cup should start watching another sport, idk, tennis or cricket.
Ofcourse is Euro is harder .
Of course a european championchip is harder to win, because ANY team can at least play decent. Football in Europe is on a different level then in the rest of the world.
That's why they get eliminated by Morocco?
And the European champions get thrashed by Argentina
@@hosnaarabanani3004 Name another Worlchampion outside of Europe not named Brasil or Argentina in the last 50-60 years. Exactly, there is none.
If worldcup is hosted in south American countries it's impossible for Europe teams to win it due to weather conditions and pitches which makes south Americans are greatest teams
...............like in 2014...........hahahahaha.
@@andrekoerber7334Literally the only wc Europeans won in south america🤣🤣
How that dwanzy called southgate is in charge of the English national team is incomprehensible!
always thought shaka had reservations against arsenal. his back and forth with craig proves his agenda
It's good for the USA to get this matching. It's what they need if they want to step up into the worlds elite. They have a ways to go.
World Cup because you face opponents of different continent.
This time any underdog can make suprise. Even Georgia.
best goalie in euros.. surprised no one mentioned Courtios
Tournament which has second devision teams like Estonia is really difficult to win😂
yeah and World Cup has third division teams like Panama, whats your point
@@GodlyTricksBro acting like panama plays every wc
Shaka vs Craig beef for a debate about backup GKs 🍿
Asian championship clearly. Go the Socceroos.
how defensive he is about that topic shows his feelings. he was speechless
What does craig think about benching kane so the younger boys can express themselves? Jude Bellingham at false 9 is a must
For England even the Nations League is difficult. Relegated to division 2 🤣
England on ur brain
Morocco league is more difficult competition than the Euros... 🎉
It's a pretty obvious reply regarding the comparison between the World cup and European championship. Before it's expansion, it was the European championship, of course. Brazil and Argentina are true greats of football but there's a lot of dross to make up for on the World scene.