David Sanger on “New Cold Wars” and the Return of Superpower Conflict | Amanpour and Company
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 8 июн 2024
- The threat to the international world order is the topic of David Sanger's latest book, "New Cold Wars." The author, a Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist, analyzes America’s volatile relationship with two great powers - China and Russia. Sanger tells Walter Isaacson what America got wrong after winning the first Cold War.
Originally aired on April 18, 2024
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Major support for Amanpour and Company is provided by The Anderson Family Endowment, Jim Attwood and Leslie Williams, Candace King Weir, the Leila and Mickey Straus Family Charitable Trust, Mark J. Blechner, the Filomen M. D'Agostino Foundation, Seton J. Melvin, Charles Rosenblum, Koo and Patricia Yuen, Barbara Hope Zuckerberg, Jeffrey Katz and Beth Rogers, Bernard and Denise Schwartz, the JPB Foundation, the Sylvia A. and Simon B. Poyta Programming Endowment to Fight Antisemitism and Josh Weston.
Subscribe to the Amanpour and Company. channel here: bit.ly/2EMIkTJ
Subscribe to our daily newsletter to find out who's on each night: www.pbs.org/wnet/amanpour-and-...
For more from Amanpour and Company, including full episodes, click here: to.pbs.org/2NBFpjf
Like Amanpour and Company on Facebook: bit.ly/2HNx3EF
Follow Amanpour and Company on Twitter: bit.ly/2HLpjTI
Watch Amanpour and Company weekdays on PBS (check local listings).
Amanpour and Company features wide-ranging, in-depth conversations with global thought leaders and cultural influencers on the issues and trends impacting the world each day, from politics, business and technology to arts, science and sports. Christiane Amanpour leads the conversation on global and domestic news from London with contributions by prominent journalists Walter Isaacson, Michel Martin, Alicia Menendez and Hari Sreenivasan from the Tisch WNET Studios at Lincoln Center in New York City.
#amanpourpbs
Thanks for this very interesting report.
I have a bad feeling about where this is headed.
I found I had to listen to certain parts twice, but it could have been the depth of information. I had no idea about Iran's involvement. The news was either missing it or keeping it out.
As always, I learn insight from Amanpour on what no one else is talking about. So appreciated!
Also must read:
1) The Bully of Asia
2) The Naked Communist
3) Love Letter to America
Exactly 💯 % true
Sangers book-great read
Well balanced and thorough.
The US still wants to help Ukraine not be defeated. But it has not proven that it is willing to help Ukraine Win. There is a very big difference.
" without (secular IMHO) education your nation falls - cardiB
Religion in history provided pre-science support for developing society and, along with geography, societal culture. Scientific work has since answered many of religion's most practical existential questions. Religion's sole role today is in the human spirit and outside government affairs.
Isolationists want to cede US leadership, moral authority, and military supremacy to other powers. They largely don't care about "winning the culture war" in the global sense, by spreading democracy and respect for human rights around the world, but are only concerned about local culture wars that they can exploit for political or financial gain. Some of them are only concerned with their own careers and social media following.
13:35 uk loves you more...
Not even new, imo. It’s extended this long.
A peoples at war are at their weakest.
Tell that to the defenders of Stalingrad during world war 2..
@@robertcline6137 They didn’t feel all that strong until the aggressors were vanquished I’d bet. Of course they had drive and purpose with their lives at stake. That’s not the same strength of a nation at peace under sane intelligent leadership. That’s not the strength that people generally wish upon their children.
Not as sharp or unsettling as "Bug"
Suggestion for Mr. Isaacson: in just 3 minutes into your interview, you interrupted Mr. Sanger twice. I found it annoying and inconsiderate as you hardly gave him much time to give a full answer. When you have a knowledgeable guest on, I want to hear the guest have an opportunity to give complete answers. You are not interviewing a nonresponsive politician here, and I'd rather here where Mr. Sanger takes the conversation than you. Given his expertise, he is likely to highlight the most important points.
correction: hear not here
Walters been doing this a while..Mr Sanger responded well to the questions..whats your problem.
Ima join the pushback on this point. It's not uncommon for Amanpour's and other highly experienced interviewers to interrupt interviwees in service to their mission of unwrapping today's most complex societal challenges. While the practice can look undue, proof of its value is in the interviewees' common ability to catch and follow their hosts' momentum.
How woke id Amanpour? 🤔....
Woke = thoughtful, now apparently.
Idiots everywhere.
Rather than recommending 65 year old books about communism or books about Chinese hegemony written by right wingers you should try looking up the definition of “woke.” Unless you’re one of those numpties who supports inequality and injustice….