0. Having an end goal Vision 1. Bigger picture 2. Seeing by zooming out 3. Sees meaning or principle or main point or conclusion rather than details 4. Sees connection with other things. 5. Reads between the lines.
More ISFP or ISFJ stuff! I really appreciate how well you dissect and explain each component of MBTI’s. I feel this is the best type of explanation on RUclips. Thank you for being thorough.
Hi, I'm also an INTP and started learning about MBTI about a year ago because I was trying to research the difference between my cousin and me. When we argue, I'm always explaining the possible scientific theories and patterns in the world and my cousin doesn't understand why I don't accept facts or opinions from experts as proof of a point. My cousin is a Physicist but to him the world is as it is and isn't as interested in the way thinks could be. So after researching a bit, I realized that the primary difference is that my cousin is a sensor and I am an intuitive. At first, this was a surprise to me because I'm a skeptic, rational and critical thinker who only accepts reality as scientific facts, but then I realized that I like to think more about scientific theories and the future more than science that has already been proven. My cousin is all about what has been proven and how to use it in his life today. Now I know that my cousin is an ISTP and that is why he is an expert in using tools, repairing and building stuff, etc. He takes risks and loves cars and off-roading, he repairs his own cars and owns every tool and device there is.
Cool! Thanks for sharing, and yes, I’ve noticed arguments can give a lot away regarding a persons thinking process, I’ve experienced many similar arguments where our differences in thinking would collide. And I find it quite frustrating sometimes how other types are so easily willing to put their trust onto another’s opinions or “facts” without considering bias etc
While I think of true scientists as always questioning and always asking others to prove him wrong, yes, a physicist could certainly be a sensor--they often see the world as "case closed." Although I'm an INTP, I am very hands on, especially being a dentist, and love to tinker and rig up stuff, etc. But that is related to being a troubleshooter or problem solver, which I love doing for the challenge. And even though I have a penchant for fixing, I am clumsy, and when reassembling something, will often miss something and end up having to disassemble it and redo it.
" I find it very distracting to focus all my attention on single point" does anyone else need/use a controlled distraction as a way to stay focused on a task? I find that when I try to force myself to focus on one thing it works better when I have something I can use to capture my desire to be distracted...
Thank you for making these videos, been reading about it since a couple of years now. However, I do enjoy listening to other real INTPs (only since our types are rare) It is relieving in some ways too. Cheers!
A sensor believes the "official story" behind 911 is true. The intuitive sees the official story as a fairy talk filled with inconsistencies that go against reason, logic and common sense. I refer to this as "conditioned' conventional thinking' which really isn't thinking, but reflexive reacting. A few months ago I read in interesting post that discussed the sensory perceiving personality and the intuitive perceiving personality. About 75% of the population tends to have a sensory perceiving personality. Among other tendencies, 'sensors' tend to trust traditional authority, they tend not to question authority, and they tend not to read between the lines, or the lies. They also tend not to connect the dots, probably because they don't see the dots. Those who tend to be 'intuitive' comprise about 25% of the population. They question authority, distrust authority, and read between the lies. They tend to connect the dots and see patterns that can be missed when one is focused upon the senses, not a bigger picture.
Intuitive seeing from a zoomed out perspective I've seen intuitive and sensors do naturally although you might mean intuitives seeing from a more intuitive perspective (couldn't think of a better way too say it) but sensors zoom out too just in a more sensory way I think, could be wrong (I might have misunderstood you) ~When you said intuitives are more likely to say: why do I feel this way? what does this mean? that's more Ti than intuitive. The intuitive eye contact thing isn't an intuitive thing, it's feminine sensory form objective personality, stopping for a moment and thinking isn't an intuitive thing it's a savior sleep and or consume thing probably (those are OPS (Objective Personality System) terms) Overall I think this is a great video
I'm curious, what do you think about sensing vs. intuition in terms of philosophical dispositions/moral intuitions? It seems to me that someone who is more interested in logical consistency and rationality would tend toward a deontological mindset, while a sensor might prefer a pragmatic and consequentialist approach. There are probably exceptions to this of course. Based on this and your "approach to arguments" video, it makes me wonder if there is not a fact of the matter about ethics-- that what you believe is correct is based on what you personally value in terms of what a position/approach can give you.
When sensors debate they recite the documentary or news article they heard it from. Intuitive s tend to create their own argument with some facts and their own philosophies
I believe it’s because INTJ’s lead by introverted intuition, which, as opposed to Ne, wants to stick with the single best idea and build upon that. Ni is always considering “what does this mean for me?”, and when they discover the “best idea” for themselves, they will stick to it ruthlessly until it’s been achieved. INTP’s, however, are the masters of generating and exploring ideas. Rarely will they stick to a single idea because they want to be open to all possibilities. An INTP can lay down all these ideas on the table to where the INTJ can use this information to ask “which is best for me”, and the INTJ can help an INTP define which of their ideas are best for them and help them actually formulate a goal rather than jump from thing to thing.
Hi I'm am intp to man.. I think I get your message about intuitive versus sensor... Good job you make me understand who am I actually... 👍👍... Sorry if my English is bad because I'm from Malaysia..
can you give me an assessment.... honestly i'm confused... do i belong to intp or istp... can you help me or give me a written test or interview me via zoom meeting...??? i hope you can help me...thank god bless you..
I don't know if you check this chanel still, but due the way your eyes move, you resemble more an ENTP than INTP, to me at least, INTP eyes move fast but ENTP is faster, are you sure you aren't one? I mistyped myself as INTP too, I'm curious
Thank you!!! I'm a fellow intp. And I love the way you break it down. Please don't go away
0. Having an end goal Vision
1. Bigger picture
2. Seeing by zooming out
3. Sees meaning or principle or main point or conclusion rather than details
4. Sees connection with other things.
5. Reads between the lines.
More ISFP or ISFJ stuff! I really appreciate how well you dissect and explain each component of MBTI’s. I feel this is the best type of explanation on RUclips.
Thank you for being thorough.
Hi, I'm also an INTP and started learning about MBTI about a year ago because I was trying to research the difference between my cousin and me. When we argue, I'm always explaining the possible scientific theories and patterns in the world and my cousin doesn't understand why I don't accept facts or opinions from experts as proof of a point. My cousin is a Physicist but to him the world is as it is and isn't as interested in the way thinks could be. So after researching a bit, I realized that the primary difference is that my cousin is a sensor and I am an intuitive. At first, this was a surprise to me because I'm a skeptic, rational and critical thinker who only accepts reality as scientific facts, but then I realized that I like to think more about scientific theories and the future more than science that has already been proven. My cousin is all about what has been proven and how to use it in his life today. Now I know that my cousin is an ISTP and that is why he is an expert in using tools, repairing and building stuff, etc. He takes risks and loves cars and off-roading, he repairs his own cars and owns every tool and device there is.
Cool! Thanks for sharing, and yes, I’ve noticed arguments can give a lot away regarding a persons thinking process, I’ve experienced many similar arguments where our differences in thinking would collide. And I find it quite frustrating sometimes how other types are so easily willing to put their trust onto another’s opinions or “facts” without considering bias etc
While I think of true scientists as always questioning and always asking others to prove him wrong, yes, a physicist could certainly be a sensor--they often see the world as "case closed." Although I'm an INTP, I am very hands on, especially being a dentist, and love to tinker and rig up stuff, etc. But that is related to being a troubleshooter or problem solver, which I love doing for the challenge. And even though I have a penchant for fixing, I am clumsy, and when reassembling something, will often miss something and end up having to disassemble it and redo it.
" I find it very distracting to focus all my attention on single point" does anyone else need/use a controlled distraction as a way to stay focused on a task? I find that when I try to force myself to focus on one thing it works better when I have something I can use to capture my desire to be distracted...
Thank you for making these videos, been reading about it since a couple of years now. However, I do enjoy listening to other real INTPs (only since our types are rare) It is relieving in some ways too. Cheers!
A sensor believes the "official story" behind 911 is true. The intuitive sees the official story as a fairy talk filled with inconsistencies that go against reason, logic and common sense.
I refer to this as "conditioned' conventional thinking' which really isn't thinking, but reflexive reacting. A few months ago I read in interesting post that discussed the sensory perceiving personality and the intuitive perceiving personality. About 75% of the population tends to have a sensory perceiving personality. Among other tendencies, 'sensors' tend to trust traditional authority, they tend not to question authority, and they tend not to read between the lines, or the lies. They also tend not to connect the dots, probably because they don't see the dots.
Those who tend to be 'intuitive' comprise about 25% of the population. They question authority, distrust authority, and read between the lies. They tend to connect the dots and see patterns that can be missed when one is focused upon the senses, not a bigger picture.
Intuitive seeing from a zoomed out perspective I've seen intuitive and sensors do naturally although you might mean intuitives seeing from a more intuitive perspective (couldn't think of a better way too say it) but sensors zoom out too just in a more sensory way I think, could be wrong (I might have misunderstood you)
~When you said intuitives are more likely to say: why do I feel this way? what does this mean? that's more Ti than intuitive. The intuitive eye contact thing isn't an intuitive thing, it's feminine sensory form objective personality, stopping for a moment and thinking isn't an intuitive thing it's a savior sleep and or consume thing probably (those are OPS (Objective Personality System) terms)
Overall I think this is a great video
I'm curious, what do you think about sensing vs. intuition in terms of philosophical dispositions/moral intuitions? It seems to me that someone who is more interested in logical consistency and rationality would tend toward a deontological mindset, while a sensor might prefer a pragmatic and consequentialist approach. There are probably exceptions to this of course. Based on this and your "approach to arguments" video, it makes me wonder if there is not a fact of the matter about ethics-- that what you believe is correct is based on what you personally value in terms of what a position/approach can give you.
Thanks for this!
When sensors debate they recite the documentary or news article they heard it from. Intuitive s tend to create their own argument with some facts and their own philosophies
From your opinion why there are many people say that intp and intj have a good relationship which mean friendship
I believe it’s because INTJ’s lead by introverted intuition, which, as opposed to Ne, wants to stick with the single best idea and build upon that. Ni is always considering “what does this mean for me?”, and when they discover the “best idea” for themselves, they will stick to it ruthlessly until it’s been achieved. INTP’s, however, are the masters of generating and exploring ideas. Rarely will they stick to a single idea because they want to be open to all possibilities. An INTP can lay down all these ideas on the table to where the INTJ can use this information to ask “which is best for me”, and the INTJ can help an INTP define which of their ideas are best for them and help them actually formulate a goal rather than jump from thing to thing.
The sound is very low
Hi I'm am intp to man.. I think I get your message about intuitive versus sensor... Good job you make me understand who am I actually... 👍👍... Sorry if my English is bad because I'm from Malaysia..
Glad I could help!!
Are you Canadian? Love your accent!
Also you're wearing plaid which may be another clue 😜
can you give me an assessment.... honestly i'm confused... do i belong to intp or istp... can you help me or give me a written test or interview me via zoom meeting...??? i hope you can help me...thank god bless you..
Brilliant
Basically, intuitives live more internally, sensors - externally
Can you do videos on esfp?
Did you have Twitter or insta ?
I don't know if you check this chanel still, but due the way your eyes move, you resemble more an ENTP than INTP, to me at least, INTP eyes move fast but ENTP is faster, are you sure you aren't one? I mistyped myself as INTP too, I'm curious