Wow, what an amazing lob at 0:36! Aggressive topspin lob with perfect placement. Now that was hit intentionally as a winner! Sinner has insane skills..
@@patrickswamps Sinner strength is that he succeeds to win even if he's in a bad day and playing not so well like with the Argentinian. Same happened at Cincinnati (won) and USO (won), this makes me say he'll win in Shanghai. Alcaraz instead today showed over again that when he's in a bad day he loses much more often than Sinner, this explains the rankings and why Sinner is the n.1 of the world by far over Alcaraz (by more than 4000 points, if he wins 5000). As I repeat all the times, it's needed the best Alcaraz to slightly win with Sinner, while a 90% Sinner can win with anybody, Alcaraz included. Last obstacle here is a Djokovic who had a ridiculously easy draw till the final...
@@usermatisse I agree with most of your points. Except with Alcaraz and Sinner, the way it seems to me, Alcaraz when facing Sinner has ways of beating him. He has things which he can do that are almost guaranteed to work, like making sinner run to the net, moving sinner around, or himself go to the net. Sinner on the other hand, has yet to find a way to consistently beat Alcaraz, and mentally he has been bested by alcaraz on all three of their matches this year
@@patrickswamps he'll find a way to be more consistent in winning with Alcaraz. With Medvedev, first to start to win constantly he was down in the H2H 6-1, now it's 7-7. The match in Beijing last week showed that it was needed a spectacular Alcaraz (his last tie break, down 3-0, won with 7 consecutive points, was out of this world!). But being out of this world, means that it cannot happen very easily all the times. It's a pity Alcaraz lost today with machac (Great congratulations to him to do it), it would have been great to watch them again fight point over point, let's hope in the atp finals (or Bercy). Anyway, my point is that Alcaraz won by little details and because at 3-0 in the final tie break, Sinner didn't succeed to serve any 1st serve anymore, how many times this will happen in future? Perfect tie break by Alcaraz and 0 1st serve by Sinner. Another thing that I continue to think is that Sinner shall improve volleys (pretty evident he has margin there) and 1st serve (I'm sure this winter he will, this year started in Melbourne with a much improved serve). Just to remember that Sinner lost with Alcaraz at the USO because of the poor serve, he was at match point with his serve... And we know how it went, Alcaraz won his first slam (that's a sliding door, I'm sure Sinner winning that match would have won USO as well). Anyway, these two guys are fantastic, next 10 years are in good hands now that also Nadal retired and Djokovic is near to retire too
Not true. The matches between them are always very close. Anyway next time sinner will win it. Not in Shanghai because machac defeated Alcaraz in straight sets
You're misinformed or the facts are over your head. WADA agrees with the verdict that Sinner didn't dope intentionally. He was doped without his knowledge. WADA is seeking to define 'negligence' instead. Also, WADA isn't suing anybody and you don't know whether he will be banned or not. Is there a cult you follow that feeds you this misinformation? Try following real news instead.
not for doping actually, but for responsability towards his staff...(Wada acknolwedged he did not dope intentionally but thinks he could have been more vigilant in preventing his staff of causing the contamination...)
Sinner's consitency is insane
He showed such patience today ... Just phenomenal
Wow, what an amazing lob at 0:36! Aggressive topspin lob with perfect placement. Now that was hit intentionally as a winner! Sinner has insane skills..
SINNER PERFORMANCE WAS SOLID, VERY POWERFUL.☄️☄️☄️
SINNER....UNICO ❤
Juan Carlos Fererro watching this match in the stand preparing Alcaraz to face Sinner, didn't see Machac coming? hehe...
meddy’s kryptonite must be sinner he’s won 1 match against jannik ever since the season started
Someone is so scared of Sinner, and is trading in influence with WADA🤑 to stop Sinner from competing in AO😅
2nd, 3rd and 5th seed gone, next 4th and 7th seed will be gone too tomorrow hehe...
Jawohl Machac 😊👍
Sinner will win Shanghai, pretty clear. And he'll do it with one of the toughest draws in a m1000 and maybe also GSs, being n.1 in the world😅
I have to disagree, he has yet to face truly high levels of tennis. The toughest time he's been given so far was by the Argentinian
@@patrickswamps Sinner strength is that he succeeds to win even if he's in a bad day and playing not so well like with the Argentinian. Same happened at Cincinnati (won) and USO (won), this makes me say he'll win in Shanghai. Alcaraz instead today showed over again that when he's in a bad day he loses much more often than Sinner, this explains the rankings and why Sinner is the n.1 of the world by far over Alcaraz (by more than 4000 points, if he wins 5000). As I repeat all the times, it's needed the best Alcaraz to slightly win with Sinner, while a 90% Sinner can win with anybody, Alcaraz included. Last obstacle here is a Djokovic who had a ridiculously easy draw till the final...
@@usermatisse I agree with most of your points. Except with Alcaraz and Sinner, the way it seems to me, Alcaraz when facing Sinner has ways of beating him. He has things which he can do that are almost guaranteed to work, like making sinner run to the net, moving sinner around, or himself go to the net. Sinner on the other hand, has yet to find a way to consistently beat Alcaraz, and mentally he has been bested by alcaraz on all three of their matches this year
@@patrickswamps he'll find a way to be more consistent in winning with Alcaraz. With Medvedev, first to start to win constantly he was down in the H2H 6-1, now it's 7-7. The match in Beijing last week showed that it was needed a spectacular Alcaraz (his last tie break, down 3-0, won with 7 consecutive points, was out of this world!). But being out of this world, means that it cannot happen very easily all the times. It's a pity Alcaraz lost today with machac (Great congratulations to him to do it), it would have been great to watch them again fight point over point, let's hope in the atp finals (or Bercy). Anyway, my point is that Alcaraz won by little details and because at 3-0 in the final tie break, Sinner didn't succeed to serve any 1st serve anymore, how many times this will happen in future? Perfect tie break by Alcaraz and 0 1st serve by Sinner. Another thing that I continue to think is that Sinner shall improve volleys (pretty evident he has margin there) and 1st serve (I'm sure this winter he will, this year started in Melbourne with a much improved serve). Just to remember that Sinner lost with Alcaraz at the USO because of the poor serve, he was at match point with his serve... And we know how it went, Alcaraz won his first slam (that's a sliding door, I'm sure Sinner winning that match would have won USO as well).
Anyway, these two guys are fantastic, next 10 years are in good hands now that also Nadal retired and Djokovic is near to retire too
@@usermatisse I can't disagree with what you've said.
Jawohl Sinner 😊👍
Medveded can't compete against Sinner or Alcaraz, it shows he's getting outplayed badly. Must be doing all sorts of tricks with his head
Medvedev lack of power is notorious
💉 💉 💉
Losers being triggered is so predictable.
Amazing..! But when its Alcaraz he's facing....he simply tumble.
tumble? did you even watch their last match?
Not true. The matches between them are always very close. Anyway next time sinner will win it. Not in Shanghai because machac defeated Alcaraz in straight sets
🥵💪
WADA is suing Sinner for doping twice, so he is done as he will be banned after trial.
You're misinformed or the facts are over your head. WADA agrees with the verdict that Sinner didn't dope intentionally. He was doped without his knowledge. WADA is seeking to define 'negligence' instead. Also, WADA isn't suing anybody and you don't know whether he will be banned or not. Is there a cult you follow that feeds you this misinformation? Try following real news instead.
not for doping actually, but for responsability towards his staff...(Wada acknolwedged he did not dope intentionally but thinks he could have been more vigilant in preventing his staff of causing the contamination...)
@@elifed2368 If Sinner loses, the idiots will insist it means he was found guilty of doping. You just can't argue a higher intelligence into someone.