2D to 3D SHEET METAL CAD PRACTICE MODEL- Free Drawing Exercise for 3D CAD users - SM RISER PAD

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 14 янв 2025

Комментарии • 20

  • @airwick5083
    @airwick5083 2 месяца назад +1

    Fun one, took about 5:15... A jog feature would be nice to have in Onshape for this (but the workaround isn't bad...)

  • @DavinderKumar-t8t
    @DavinderKumar-t8t Месяц назад +2

    I was unable to pattern the Jog, is there any other way other than making a separate jog of each in solid works, i was unable to do mirror body as well end up doing all of the Jogs separately

    • @TooTallToby
      @TooTallToby  Месяц назад +2

      hi Davinder! Here's a video response I made: ruclips.net/video/hJcK43If3UY/видео.html
      Enjoy!

    • @DavinderKumar-t8t
      @DavinderKumar-t8t Месяц назад

      @@TooTallToby Thanks toby.

  • @rit0838
    @rit0838 2 месяца назад +2

    Would love to see an onshape tutorial for this one, you cannot create jogs like in other software.

    • @airwick5083
      @airwick5083 2 месяца назад +2

      I replied to this but the stupid YT algorithm didn't think my reply was worthy, or thought it was spam or whatever, sigh... The trick was to do the circular section of the part with one of the jogged tabs and circular pattern the whole part before making the rest of the part. Look for the part name on public docs (TTT 2024-11-12-SM Riser PAD Three ways)

    • @airwavested
      @airwavested Месяц назад +2

      @@airwick5083 Can I ask why you chose to do the centre flanges at 90° and then Move Face (Rotate) rather than 75° in the Flange tool.
      Is there an advantage to doing it your way? Thanks.

    • @airwick5083
      @airwick5083 Месяц назад +2

      ​@@airwavested I guess my question would what would your preferred way of doing it be? If you make the flange 75 you can't control the height from the top face directly...
      You can adjust it after adding the second parallel flange with a move face or you could create a ref. sketch to have an "up to" reference but I find doing it with the flange at 90 is the most straightforward way of getting the spacing right.

    • @airwavested
      @airwavested Месяц назад

      @@airwick5083 Just revisited this model and tried both methods to form these flanges and your method of Move Face is indeed more accurate! I hadn't noticed that with my method that although the final mass was well within tolerance the overall height of the flange was out by 0.17mm. Not much but still wrong!
      Many thanks for your feedback and insight it's much appreciated.
      Additional thanks are added as I've just discovered the Shaped Flange Feature Script via your SM Riser PAD Three ways document. 👍👍👍

  • @CerberaLM
    @CerberaLM 2 месяца назад +1

    1420.1g in 7:58

  • @damaskinoseli5386
    @damaskinoseli5386 2 месяца назад +1

    1420.30 g, 1xBase-Flange, 1xEdge-Flange, 4xJog

  • @KeithCarter-r4w
    @KeithCarter-r4w 2 месяца назад

    Toby, tricky model. I came up with 1420.3g @ about 12min. Used sheet metal in Solidworks. First method used two normal bends for the 4 inner tabs. However the flat pattern has the tabs overlapping. Tried it using a separate jog for each tab, mass comes out the same but the tabs still overlap. Hmmm

  • @ciorad1389
    @ciorad1389 2 месяца назад +1

    1420 g. Took me some time to do it. Difficult part. Dragoș

  • @sethg7897
    @sethg7897 2 месяца назад +1

    1420.3g in FreeCAD. Over time.

  • @ሳተናው-Satenaw
    @ሳተናው-Satenaw 2 месяца назад

    1420.30 grams