Let me get you caught up. James Webb was never designed to see the end of the universe. There’s another telescope that is being worked on and will be up there in 2027 just like Web. It will take forever to come out but when it does, it will see even further clear and wider view. They had the plans for it before Webb was completed.
Thats a really interesting fact, BUT... we would discover the same phenomena (compact celestial bodies and black holes, nebulae, etc.) again and again, even with a distance of 20 billion light years (a glimps into the predecessor universe?). The (really) intruiguing fact would be what we could discover at 30 bill. light years (if there was something), maybe another pre-predecessor universe? The universe is and remains a great mystery for us...
We were told in advance that the Webb technology would not permit seeing beyond the boundary of our expanding universe. Here is what Google AI says "No, the James Webb Space Telescope (Webb) cannot see beyond the boundary of our expanding universe; due to the limitations of the speed of light, there is a "cosmological horizon" beyond which no telescope can observe, meaning we can only see objects that emitted light within the observable universe's age, effectively setting a limit to how far back in time we can see."
An infinite loop of one universe being consumed by a black hole creating a new universe locked in a cycle of rebirth and destruction, one possibility played out at a time
At some point, one lives long enough to realize that the theories are always incomplete. I believe in the concept of Eternal. New theories will bring new understanding, but we never reach the point of knowing everything.
It is the narrator who wins the real applause .. clear, well-modulated, and thus allowing the information to shine through both the study matter and the graphics. ;o)
Einstein was certainly a great astrophysicist, but in his time at the beginning of the 20th century. If Einstein were still alive and working today, he would have very different views and insights. The universe did not begin with a Big Bang and a singularity. The excellent JWST shows us images that cannot be explained by the Big Bang theory. Most astrophysicists today know this and are trying to find alternative ideas, such as string theory or bounce cosmology. The idea of a parallel universe is not so bad either and is definitely more likely than the whole Big Bang idea...
That is the most sensible liklihood. It doesn't require superintellectual cosmologists (whom have been essentially proven wrong at every turn since the launch of Webb telescope) to figure out the what and how and when of the universe as we know it. I posit that there is no end to the space beyond what we can "see" through a peephole and we will probably never know it's extent before we vanish as a specie from this existence. That is not negativism, just practical sense. We are expendable and if obsolesece doesn't eliminate us, perhaps something else that is unimaginable will. We are NOT indespensable.
@phyl1283 well said Phyll. BUT. Does even obsolescence make us indispensable? I'd like to think not. I'd like to think we can, and will, do better. And stick around for a bit on this Planet. And maybe for a lot longer on other Planets ? 🙂
Why is it that we do not see black holes feeding on dark matter? Even if we couldn't detect the dark matter, wouldn't it cause changes to a black hole that can be detected? 🤔
Whatever was what it was that was the Big Bang, it had to expand out into something else, and wherever it could not expand out, something was lacking as the precursor to the ability of the expanding universe to move. So something else was a Medium, not that the Big Bang was alone , it intersected something else, that compounded the event into materializing the world. So imagine a wave of heat passing through a fabric of space time, and where the union of both unique things meet , like sexual procreation , the Heat Wave, intersecting the Fabric of Space Time, would procreate a PARTICLE to appear, like a mama and papa have the baby. So Particles are the product of intersecting worlds that create matter. So the particle could not exist if the wave of heat energy did not weave it's way and move through a background fabric of space time. But in places where the Universe is totally empty , called a VOID you cannot make a union of two things, when the other thing is simply not there to mingle, with the expanding energy of the Big Bang. The Particle is a SIGN that a union of things met, the Fabric of Space Time, and the Wave of Energy coursing through the fabric, and where it intersected it performed a procreative act of conception of Particles that make up atoms and molecules and things we sense as human beings as the material world. So heat as a wave itself alone is impotent, and the fabric of space time by itself is desolate, but like a man and women having sex, it formed a more perfect Union . The result of the union of two distinct unique things spawned the BABY as a Particle, instead of the Wave, and instead of the Fabric of Space Time, being VIRGINAL . All ideas are merely Parables of other things that you are familiar with, that can be poetic and analogous to things you think are a Mystery.
Voids in space are areas where Light did not propagate through those areas, because the precursor to light propagation is a fabric of space time, some sort of matter, that then light as photon energy can move through, like a capillary action of drawing up liquid through a straw, but in the VOIDS are huge areas so empty of anything , that there is no precursor fabric of Space Time for the Light to propagate through that sort absence of the Medium required for light to move. Light can stand still , light has been slowed down in some laboratories to about twenty miles per hour. So light does not propagate by itself, it is a complex union of things , the photon energy needs a host space to pull it through the darkness, but if the fabric of Space Time is not there at all it is truly empty of all matters, the Light cannot penetrate those places, and the mystery is about what portends to be the meaning of the VOIDS in Space ???
Black Holes only appear dark, because the Light is being pulled away from where you are able to be the Observer of what is happening. The Light moves away faster than you can witness it, so it is a Black Hole, but the direction of what falls into the Black Hole may be directional towards a White Hole, but you are not available to get into the place of observation of that motion .
Thirdly Heat Energy works that same way. If you have a Heat Sink and the energy of heat is moving away from you, you get really cold. If the directional motion of the Heat Energy is moving towards you , you get hot. So also Light moves away from you faster than light, you see Black Holes. If the Light is moving towards you you get both the Light and the Heat bombarding you directly , so Hot and Cold is a signal of directional travel of Energy.
@@CarmineFragione-u1t very interesting position Carmine. Are you theorising on an answer to dark matter? Also, where, when, and by whom, was Light slowed down to 20 MPH?
Good nothing to see there. Now let's fix up human political corruption.
21 час назад
0:27 well it is going to look empty if you're observing from a stationary point? Have we ever sent telescopes deeper into the universe's "direction of origin" if that exists?? Personally I do not believe the universe is 13.8 billion years old, I feel it's closer to 16.4 billion... that is based on a lecture video I saw where the Mayan calendar is interpreted from the perspective of consciousness evolution.
IF AI will be really intelligent and got taught all the facts, it will come to the solution that life has to be protected at all cost. Consciousness is a small flame in the ocean of darkness.
distance, GREAT DISTANCE will take care of that. We depend on the receptors in our retinas and the work of some great machines that we have invented to give us scant evidence of what is "out there". We'll never get any closer and the limits of our machine's ability to give us a tiny peek will ultimately play out their role in our ability at making guesses at what "may be" but probably isn't. You can't magnify what you can't see.
The Big Splat made the universe but the Dark Buggers suck it up, so hard so see how the Buggers are relicts of the Splat. One would think one singularity in, one singularity out.
Einstein is exactly right, but for reasons maybe even he didn't understand. I've said it before, trying to see beyond what we can see now, it's like trying to see past the skin of God, it's just not possible, nor will it ever be... Air
9th ..for all we know, Other Universes could be on the Other Side of Black Holes? ...and on their side , all that could be seen is a black hole..... I love this stuff, it hurts my head....
Have you seen the theory that we are actually inside of a black hole? Space is so interesting. I started off just being curious if Uranus smelled bad. Then just kept researching. At one point I was obsessed with Uranus. I couldn’t get enough of Uranus. I finally just had to accept I’d never even be able to see Uranus. Let alone smell it.
There are millions of universes growing in a vast sea of seas, like amoebas, eating and growing and reproducing. ...As above, so below? God may not have put limits on creation.
The more we see, the more we really need to toss the singularity event/expanding space/single big bang theory out the window. The very fact that we see black holes "seemingly older than the universe" is because they ARE older than 14 billion years, because the universe IS MUCH OLDER than that. Think about it. If everything came form one single point and expanded outward, with space being already infinitely large, how can you expand it into MORE? Also, like any explotion, if it came from one single point, then everything would be moving outward and away from that point. There would NEVER be galaxiy mergers, like what is actually happening to our galaxy - galactic paths would simply never cross, especially if they were "expanding" outward and away from each other, which in itself proves this is not what happened. It makes far more sense to conclude from what we see today, that our galaxy (and possibly several others, but not all of what we see in the sky today) came from one explosion of many. Likely a super nova black hole that reached critical mass, could no longer support itself, and collapsed under immense gravitational strain. What happens when protons touch each other? E=MC2 explosion, sending all matter out with such force that it creates entire galaxies, releasing all that matter, which combines and creates stars, planets, asteroids, and all the elements we see today. Large chunks of matter, over time, clumped together as it spread out, forming galaxies. We could search for only galaxies that are heading away from a point along our trajectory to find which galaxies belong to our black hole bang, and all others are obvsiously from different black hole bangs that have just now came into our field of view. The "background radiation" we see everywhere is likely evidence that light loses energy over time and distance, as would be expected, otherwise light would be perpetual motion machines, which is impossible. Since light cannot slow down, it can only lose energy by "shifting" its wavelength. We know this happens because ultraviolet light has more energy than visible light, which has more energy than infra red light, which in turn has more energy than radiation waves travelling at light speed. Then radio waves, after that the waves slow and are no longer traveling at the speed of light and fizzle out. So when we detect these background radiation waves in EVERY direction, that is proof that galaxies exist everywhere in every direction in the entire infinite universe. If we try, we may be able to deduce how much light shifts over distance and time to understand how large our actual visible universe is, and this is also why it is almost impossible to look in any direction and not see light or microwaves coming towards us - because sooner or later you will encounter the path of light from a distant star or galaxy that came from that point. So the universe is more than likely trillions of trillions of years old, and it will continue for a while longer, since black holes are still attracting and gobbling up stars and galaxies, one day becoming large enough to burp out anohter explosion of galaxies. Eventually they will cease to have sufficient material and the universe will once again become stagnant until another event happens that triggers the release of energy to dissipate into our plane of existence and spur on a new batch of matter. My guess is that our plane of existence is akin to what we see in the micro plane below us - spinning electrons surrounding protons and neutrons, time seemingly whizzing passed at the speed of light - but on the plane above us, our entire galaxy could be seen as a spinning atom, and our entire visible univers is simply a simple thing on that plane. Energies are passed in different forms to planes below, and time is very, very slow at the top plane where nothing exists for an infinite time and in infinite directions, until one day a "sag" occurs where one side of the entirety of nothingness becomes heavier than the other, and a ripple of gravitational waves is sent down to the planes below before snapping back to uniformity - but in that instant, trillions of years are perceived just a few planes down, and we are stuck somewhere in the middle, contemplating existence.
And red shift occurs in things that are made of waves. The double slit experiment proved light was waves...or did it...? because it begins to play tricks on us when it starts to remember and becomes a particle. So why some still use a red shift in light to determine speed/direction and assume all points are moving away from us seems kinda dumb. I think light not only loses energy but also varies in speed from some unkown force we have yet to discover.
Btw...I really enjoyed reading your comment. It's by far the most thought provoking and probably more closer to the truth than most comments I've read in a long time.
Also...huge empty voids and many of them almost instantly disprove a big bang theory from one singularity...at least from a rational veiw point. One wouldn't expect huge empty voids.
And...I'm more inclined to the *universe in a flower* type of thinking where every galaxy is an electron and every electron is a galaxy going infinitely in size both up and down the scale. Others have thought it before me but I had a dream about it once.
Your "380,000 years" statement is off slightly - by 1,000 times. Either profoundly incompetent editing or more likely, profoundly incompetent knowledge by the money hungry video producer.
Thanks!
Thank you very much ❤️
Let me get you caught up. James Webb was never designed to see the end of the universe. There’s another telescope that is being worked on and will be up there in 2027 just like Web. It will take forever to come out but when it does, it will see even further clear and wider view. They had the plans for it before Webb was completed.
Thats a really interesting fact, BUT... we would discover the same phenomena (compact celestial bodies and black holes, nebulae, etc.) again and again, even with a distance of 20 billion light years (a glimps into the predecessor universe?).
The (really) intruiguing fact would be what we could discover at 30 bill. light years (if there was something), maybe another pre-predecessor universe?
The universe is and remains a great mystery for us...
We were told in advance that the Webb technology would not permit seeing beyond the boundary of our expanding universe. Here is what Google AI says "No, the James Webb Space Telescope (Webb) cannot see beyond the boundary of our expanding universe; due to the limitations of the speed of light, there is a "cosmological horizon" beyond which no telescope can observe, meaning we can only see objects that emitted light within the observable universe's age, effectively setting a limit to how far back in time we can see."
An infinite loop of one universe being consumed by a black hole creating a new universe locked in a cycle of rebirth and destruction, one possibility played out at a time
At some point, one lives long enough to realize that the theories are always incomplete. I believe in the concept of Eternal. New theories will bring new understanding, but we never reach the point of knowing everything.
Let's get real and we really dont know space like 99.99 %
It is the narrator who wins the real applause .. clear, well-modulated, and thus allowing the information to shine through both the study matter and the graphics.
;o)
AI rendering
The universe is infinite and eternal. What is eternal has no beginning. What is infinite is not expanding - it is already everywhere.
Einstein was certainly a great astrophysicist, but in his time at the beginning of the 20th century. If Einstein were still alive and working today, he would have very different views and insights. The universe did not begin with a Big Bang and a singularity.
The excellent JWST shows us images that cannot be explained by the Big Bang theory.
Most astrophysicists today know this and are trying to find alternative ideas, such as string theory or bounce cosmology. The idea of a parallel universe is not so bad either and is definitely more likely than the whole Big Bang idea...
I am no Astrophysicst but I make you right.
That is the most sensible liklihood. It doesn't require superintellectual cosmologists (whom have been essentially proven wrong at every turn since the launch of Webb telescope) to figure out the what and how and when of the universe as we know it. I posit that there is no end to the space beyond what we can "see" through a peephole and we will probably never know it's extent before we vanish as a specie from this existence. That is not negativism, just practical sense. We are expendable and if obsolesece doesn't eliminate us, perhaps something else that is unimaginable will. We are NOT indespensable.
Its just mathematics and all these ideas has already been worked out 100 years before physicsist made these 'discoveries'.
@phyl1283 well said Phyll.
BUT.
Does even obsolescence make us indispensable?
I'd like to think not.
I'd like to think we can, and will, do better.
And stick around for a bit on this Planet.
And maybe for a lot longer on other Planets ?
🙂
@HuiYingHong-b8q 100 years?
Times that by many?
You seen this Sanskrit stuff?
Why is it that we do not see black holes feeding on dark matter? Even if we couldn't detect the dark matter, wouldn't it cause changes to a black hole that can be detected? 🤔
We live inside a huge creature.
Indeed. The living universe 😊
Whatever was what it was that was the Big Bang, it had to expand out into something else, and wherever it could not expand out, something was lacking as the precursor to the ability of the expanding universe to move. So something else was a Medium, not that the Big Bang was alone , it intersected something else, that compounded the event into materializing the world. So imagine a wave of heat passing through a fabric of space time, and where the union of both unique things meet , like sexual procreation , the Heat Wave, intersecting the Fabric of Space Time, would procreate a PARTICLE to appear, like a mama and papa have the baby. So Particles are the product of intersecting worlds that create matter. So the particle could not exist if the wave of heat energy did not weave it's way and move through a background fabric of space time. But in places where the Universe is totally empty , called a VOID you cannot make a union of two things, when the other thing is simply not there to mingle, with the expanding energy of the Big Bang. The Particle is a SIGN that a union of things met, the Fabric of Space Time, and the Wave of Energy coursing through the fabric, and where it intersected it performed a procreative act of conception of Particles that make up atoms and molecules and things we sense as human beings as the material world. So heat as a wave itself alone is impotent, and the fabric of space time by itself is desolate, but like a man and women having sex, it formed a more perfect Union . The result of the union of two distinct unique things spawned the BABY as a Particle, instead of the Wave, and instead of the Fabric of Space Time, being VIRGINAL . All ideas are merely Parables of other things that you are familiar with, that can be poetic and analogous to things you think are a Mystery.
You're wrong in so many way, I don't know where to start...
@@CarmineFragione-u1t Awesomely put Carmine. That fellow Antony is speaking at a mirror imho.
A broken clock is right twice a day
Joking 😁
Its just mathematics and all these ideas has already been worked out 100 years before physicsist made these 'discoveries'.
Voids in space are areas where Light did not propagate through those areas, because the precursor to light propagation is a fabric of space time, some sort of matter, that then light as photon energy can move through, like a capillary action of drawing up liquid through a straw, but in the VOIDS are huge areas so empty of anything , that there is no precursor fabric of Space Time for the Light to propagate through that sort absence of the Medium required for light to move. Light can stand still , light has been slowed down in some laboratories to about twenty miles per hour. So light does not propagate by itself, it is a complex union of things , the photon energy needs a host space to pull it through the darkness, but if the fabric of Space Time is not there at all it is truly empty of all matters, the Light cannot penetrate those places, and the mystery is about what portends to be the meaning of the VOIDS in Space ???
Black Holes only appear dark, because the Light is being pulled away from where you are able to be the Observer of what is happening. The Light moves away faster than you can witness it, so it is a Black Hole, but the direction of what falls into the Black Hole may be directional towards a White Hole, but you are not available to get into the place of observation of that motion .
Thirdly Heat Energy works that same way. If you have a Heat Sink and the energy of heat is moving away from you, you get really cold. If the directional motion of the Heat Energy is moving towards you , you get hot. So also Light moves away from you faster than light, you see Black Holes. If the Light is moving towards you you get both the Light and the Heat bombarding you directly , so Hot and Cold is a signal of directional travel of Energy.
Any type of huge void and especially many huge voids, would make the assumption of a big bang look down right silly.
@@jayrussell3796 Just that whatever it was that banged, had to expand into something else, making it a complex or compound problem.
@@CarmineFragione-u1t very interesting position Carmine.
Are you theorising on an answer to dark matter?
Also, where, when, and by whom, was Light slowed down to 20 MPH?
Send up a second JWST and place it 180 deg from JWST to double the resolution of JWST and you’ll be able to see much further
Good nothing to see there. Now let's fix up human political corruption.
0:27 well it is going to look empty if you're observing from a stationary point? Have we ever sent telescopes deeper into the universe's "direction of origin" if that exists?? Personally I do not believe the universe is 13.8 billion years old, I feel it's closer to 16.4 billion... that is based on a lecture video I saw where the Mayan calendar is interpreted from the perspective of consciousness evolution.
IF AI will be really intelligent and got taught all the facts, it will come to the solution that life has to be protected at all cost.
Consciousness is a small flame in the ocean of darkness.
how about this, the edge of the universe could be a barrier that cannot be penetrated by light because it is the barrier between 2 universes
distance, GREAT DISTANCE will take care of that. We depend on the receptors in our retinas and the work of some great machines that we have invented to give us scant evidence of what is "out there". We'll never get any closer and the limits of our machine's ability to give us a tiny peek will ultimately play out their role in our ability at making guesses at what "may be" but probably isn't. You can't magnify what you can't see.
Its just mathematics and all these ideas has already been worked out 100 years before physicsist made these 'discoveries'.
When i was kid i read somewhere that in the future we can use Black holes to travel fast and far. Is there any truth to that?
The Big Splat made the universe but the Dark Buggers suck it up, so hard so see how the Buggers are relicts of the Splat. One would think one singularity in, one singularity out.
Einstein couldn't see but I know someone who can.
Wayne Gretzky.
Is there light ,if there is nothing to see it?
Einstein is exactly right, but for reasons maybe even he didn't understand. I've said it before, trying to see beyond what we can see now, it's like trying to see past the skin of God, it's just not possible, nor will it ever be...
Air
Its just mathematics and all these ideas has already been worked out 100 years before physicsist made these 'discoveries'.
9th ..for all we know, Other Universes could be on the Other Side of Black Holes? ...and on their side , all that could be seen is a black hole..... I love this stuff, it hurts my head....
Have you seen the theory that we are actually inside of a black hole? Space is so interesting. I started off just being curious if Uranus smelled bad. Then just kept researching. At one point I was obsessed with Uranus. I couldn’t get enough of Uranus. I finally just had to accept I’d never even be able to see Uranus. Let alone smell it.
There are millions of universes growing in a vast sea of seas, like amoebas, eating and growing and reproducing. ...As above, so below? God may not have put limits on creation.
The more we see, the more we really need to toss the singularity event/expanding space/single big bang theory out the window. The very fact that we see black holes "seemingly older than the universe" is because they ARE older than 14 billion years, because the universe IS MUCH OLDER than that. Think about it. If everything came form one single point and expanded outward, with space being already infinitely large, how can you expand it into MORE? Also, like any explotion, if it came from one single point, then everything would be moving outward and away from that point. There would NEVER be galaxiy mergers, like what is actually happening to our galaxy - galactic paths would simply never cross, especially if they were "expanding" outward and away from each other, which in itself proves this is not what happened. It makes far more sense to conclude from what we see today, that our galaxy (and possibly several others, but not all of what we see in the sky today) came from one explosion of many. Likely a super nova black hole that reached critical mass, could no longer support itself, and collapsed under immense gravitational strain. What happens when protons touch each other? E=MC2 explosion, sending all matter out with such force that it creates entire galaxies, releasing all that matter, which combines and creates stars, planets, asteroids, and all the elements we see today. Large chunks of matter, over time, clumped together as it spread out, forming galaxies. We could search for only galaxies that are heading away from a point along our trajectory to find which galaxies belong to our black hole bang, and all others are obvsiously from different black hole bangs that have just now came into our field of view. The "background radiation" we see everywhere is likely evidence that light loses energy over time and distance, as would be expected, otherwise light would be perpetual motion machines, which is impossible. Since light cannot slow down, it can only lose energy by "shifting" its wavelength. We know this happens because ultraviolet light has more energy than visible light, which has more energy than infra red light, which in turn has more energy than radiation waves travelling at light speed. Then radio waves, after that the waves slow and are no longer traveling at the speed of light and fizzle out. So when we detect these background radiation waves in EVERY direction, that is proof that galaxies exist everywhere in every direction in the entire infinite universe. If we try, we may be able to deduce how much light shifts over distance and time to understand how large our actual visible universe is, and this is also why it is almost impossible to look in any direction and not see light or microwaves coming towards us - because sooner or later you will encounter the path of light from a distant star or galaxy that came from that point. So the universe is more than likely trillions of trillions of years old, and it will continue for a while longer, since black holes are still attracting and gobbling up stars and galaxies, one day becoming large enough to burp out anohter explosion of galaxies. Eventually they will cease to have sufficient material and the universe will once again become stagnant until another event happens that triggers the release of energy to dissipate into our plane of existence and spur on a new batch of matter. My guess is that our plane of existence is akin to what we see in the micro plane below us - spinning electrons surrounding protons and neutrons, time seemingly whizzing passed at the speed of light - but on the plane above us, our entire galaxy could be seen as a spinning atom, and our entire visible univers is simply a simple thing on that plane. Energies are passed in different forms to planes below, and time is very, very slow at the top plane where nothing exists for an infinite time and in infinite directions, until one day a "sag" occurs where one side of the entirety of nothingness becomes heavier than the other, and a ripple of gravitational waves is sent down to the planes below before snapping back to uniformity - but in that instant, trillions of years are perceived just a few planes down, and we are stuck somewhere in the middle, contemplating existence.
Wouldn't it just be easier to say that God created us and we'll never understand it all until we die ?
And red shift occurs in things that are made of waves. The double slit experiment proved light was waves...or did it...? because it begins to play tricks on us when it starts to remember and becomes a particle. So why some still use a red shift in light to determine speed/direction and assume all points are moving away from us seems kinda dumb. I think light not only loses energy but also varies in speed from some unkown force we have yet to discover.
Btw...I really enjoyed reading your comment. It's by far the most thought provoking and probably more closer to the truth than most comments I've read in a long time.
Also...huge empty voids and many of them almost instantly disprove a big bang theory from one singularity...at least from a rational veiw point. One wouldn't expect huge empty voids.
And...I'm more inclined to the *universe in a flower* type of thinking where every galaxy is an electron and every electron is a galaxy going infinitely in size both up and down the scale. Others have thought it before me but I had a dream about it once.
A black hole being called a void,a very gravity dense void dudes
The big bang might have been a black hole that was so old it ripped a part because it was so old and large
Its just mathematics and all these ideas has already been worked out 100 years before physicsist made these 'discoveries'.
Your spamming bro
Could the universe actually be round , so looking afar is only good until the universe dips in to the horizon.
Your "380,000 years" statement is off slightly
- by 1,000 times. Either profoundly incompetent editing or more likely, profoundly incompetent knowledge by the money hungry video producer.
Somewhere in the universe, someone is looking through a telescope witnessing the Big bang or several, in different directions, 360°.. 🤔
The flash of the big bang went forward ever outward to infinity. So why are they looking backwards in time ?
Its just mathematics and all these ideas has already been worked out 100 years before physicsist made these 'discoveries'.
@HuiYingHong-b8q hey bro you're spamming
@@HuiYingHong-b8q so has the math's been done for the forward expansion of the universe?
The Big Bang is an infinite series of events in an infinite universe
Given that INFINITY is
accepted as a concept
the void must be what
envelops matter! At least
to my puny mind! 😂😂
WRONG. YOU SAID "EINSTEIN'S GEN. THEORY". THE GEN THEORY WAS DEVELOPED BY OTHER SCIENTIST IF HIS DAY. HIS WAS A THEORY OF SPECIFIC RELATIVITY.
Farther.
Darkness is a subjective thing in brains mate, it's not out there as they say, just saying 😅.
whatever, it happened just like Father said in Genesis. You think you came from a monkey, how sad.
You may just be the living, walking proof of that theory.
I am a monkey.
You think you came from clay, which is way sadder.
No we are descended from apes , the evidence is written large in the tree of life , but like all good apologists you'll know that of course .
Its 2025. You think an invisible god created you? Oh dear.
Everything I see points to our G-d.
The universe is the mind of God, possibly