I am a UK citizen who lives on a state pension of £208 a week. I still manage to find a bit of money to help out a Ukrainian refugee friend who has a disabled son to care for. Whilst it's true that many people in the UK struggle to make ends meet, one only has to look around to see so many, many people with far more material wealth than they need. Just look at the value of people's cars, and how much people spend on holidays and alcohol. Many people are greedy and have nauseatingly high material expectations.
Big ups bro. Unfortunately a lot of sustained PsyOps by Putin's cult havbe led to a lot of people being so anti war they don't even want to think about it as it hurts their feelies. Meanwhile those of us who know and appreciate the horror of dictator driven war, and will contribute in any way we can to fight that.
What do you mean "Dealing with Russia in future"? Who should attack first? Do you think Russia is able to sustain a war with all NATO block? Look at the military budget. The US alone spends more than at least 10 countries in the list combined. Russian population and mobilization capabilities are way lower but for some reason they want to invade, doesn't them? What for? Of course, according to Russian doctrine it have to use nukes if it's a threat of territirial loses or even existance but who would plan a war to lose own territory or even being completely destroyed? On my opinion, media prepares you guys for being involved in a war in this way or another. I'd be nervous if I was you.
An idiot talking about idiocy, this is now a proxy war, Ukraine was militarily exhuseted in May 2022😂😂😂 Now NATO is being done the same, no chance of winning now they can only hope Putin is foolish enough to negotiate 😂
I agree with the logic of suprise but I think in the case of missiles it's worth being transparent about what we supply so Russia doesn't misinterpret what's being fired at it. We should just give Ukraine ss, atacams and tomahawk and tell the Russians they only have conventional warheads and then let the Ukranians get on with it!
Ukrainians are not given the targeting keys to western advanced weapons. Hands of an American with a clearance must be inside the weapon hours before use to input the key. This is the issue.
Putler is losing about 1000 men per day, over 600k so far. Unsustainable. This talking head forgets that war is an accelerator for technical development, and Ukraine is very good at it in contrast to the enemy. So there will be more surprises ahead. Ukraine is now far ahead of old NATO strategies, in particular with drone warfare.
@@timthetiny7538Common sense says if you are now offering $20,000 just for signing up to some backward pig farmer from Siberia you got a man power problem Africa have cottoned on that no matter the amount it ain't worth it
Ukraine designed & manufactured Russian ballistic missiles so it is clear they are ready waiting for Quad permission to strike Russia, the drones destroyed 65kt of ammo & missile's ending the red lines so the future looks dim for Putin
Let's say Putin is ousted and Russia proposes the following peace terms. 1. Completely withdraws from Ukraine including Crimea. 2. Pays reparations. But on one condition, that Russia too will be accepted into NATO alongside Ukraine. Would that be an acceptable proposal? Why or why not?
If he did Ukraine are definitely not going to deliver it. Thoughts on the 15 to 20,000 civilians killed in the Donbas by Ukraine 2014 t0 22.?..... funded by USA $22 billion.
NATO typically does not accept countries that are actively engaged in war because of several key reasons: 1. Article 5 Obligations: NATO's cornerstone is Article 5, which states that an attack on one member is considered an attack on all members. Admitting a country at war would immediately obligate all NATO members to defend it, potentially pulling the alliance into a direct conflict. 2. Escalation Risks: If NATO were to admit a country involved in an ongoing conflict, it risks escalating the war, as adversaries might see it as NATO's direct involvement. This could lead to broader regional or even global tensions. 3. Stability Concerns: NATO membership requires stability, both in terms of government and territorial control. Countries in active conflict may lack the necessary stability, which could complicate NATO's mission of collective defense. 4. Political Consensus: New members require unanimous approval from existing NATO members. Many NATO countries are cautious about extending membership to countries at war to avoid being drawn into conflicts they did not choose. 5. Conflict Resolution: NATO often prefers countries seeking membership to resolve ongoing conflicts before joining to avoid complicating the alliance's internal dynamics and priorities.
@@aexetanius Unfortunately this gives Russia an incentive to invade countries. The Russian government can look at this NATO rule and think that it's good for Russia that it invaded Ukraine, Moldova and Georgia because none of them are allowed to join NATO so long as they still have a territorial dispute over land that Russia invaded and stole from them.
I would like to ask, if a country invaded your country, would you be talking about giving up some of your country to the invaders for an end to their aggression? Like the Russians invading Alaska and the Americans saying for the sake of peace the invaders can keep what they took. An interesting standard for the rest of the world that is watching. We can’t depend on them nor should we for them.
One commentator was mentioning that a prominent and old American slogan is "Give me liberty or give me death". The commentator was saying that it is thus strange of some Americans to tell Ukrainians that they should just give some Ukrainian territory to Russia to gain "peace" even though it means that some Ukrainians will then be under Russian occupation and Russian oppression indefinitely.
@@terryasselstine6879 Using your logic, how would you like it if Russia and China started building defensive missile bases around your borders. And if you had agreed for them to stop. But then they just kept doing it? Would that make you feel uncomfortable? Or would you be like, nah bro, just do your thing. There is nuance here. It's not a case of Putin bad, Biden good. Look into the history of this conflict. I don't agree with Russia on their invasion. But I also don't agree that NATO should be continuously expanding and surrounding Russia. They have a free shot in Ukraine and NATO can't do anything about it. Also, please give me a justification as to why England and the USA can invade and destroy Iraq. But Russia isn't allowed to?
You have to remember that Ukraine was a big builder of weapons for Russia and those people who were designing and building those weapons. It was their rocket motors that were in the newer ICBM of the Russian military. So they can build weapons with or without the United States. Slava Ukraini
"Why politically inflame russia?" So, support Ukraine, but only up to the point where it angers that thing in the Kremlin, then stop? Instant skip every time this clown is on.
they are going to blame the west for starting the war and escalation...anyway ...so why bother pandering ? However I noticed that "mushroom clouds" over Russia are getting more common recently with the hits on ammo dumps. People have hardly reacted . Targetting Russian defence facilities seems easy...when a drone can travel 1000's of miles. More "mushroom clouds" over Russia is inevitable if Putin stays in power
@@billy2807 MSM uses the propaganda to reinforce the indoctrinated mistrust of Russia that stems from the Western Cold War stance. No mention of this being a US plan for aggressive NATO expansion. Conceived in the 80s before the fall of the Berlin Wall. That Europe warned would be seen as an existential threat to Russia and result in an armed response. The Georgia coup failed so the strong Far-Right Nationalist Ukraine regime was funded from 2014.....$22 billion. Resulting in 15 to 20,000 civilian casualties in the pro-Russian areas that overwhelmingly voted for Russian protection. These votes were not recognised as being legitimate and the Ukrainian genocide was ignored.
@timthetiny7538 you know what? You're right. I'll take it a step further. Sean is a fighter pilot. He served his country and has done and seen things that I never will, based on his skill, intellect, and work ethic, any or all of which may, and likely do, dwarf my own. I was wrong to call him a clown. He's consistently wrong about russia, consistently blurts out things that aren't true, and consistently paints a picture of appeasement as a viable option. It isn't, and he's wrong every single time he says it. I'm skipping any video with him in it from now on, because he feels no need to stay in his lane. But he's not a clown. I'm sorry I said that.
Man, for those who slept last 5 years, Ukraine even changed their constitution with an article that includes Ukraine as a NATO member before the war even began (if we count 2022 as the year of its beginning of course).
Maybe the west will learn it's lesson and admit Ukraine to NATO immediately. If we would have when Ukraine first asked there would have been no invasion in 2014
@@grisall what if Ukraine refuse entering NATO or accept any foreign training on their territory? Don't you think Russia wouldn't be even triggered then? Somehow they managed to live in peace for decades. Ukrainian desire to enter NATO made Russia to invade. Russia claimed many times that should be a red line for them (by the way, the only time they really "drawn" a red line...apart of that journalist and politicians bullsht we heard) and they'll have to give a military response. But some smart head decided there were not serious. If you think Ukraine should be accepted as a NATO member immediately means you should also accept consequenses. Are you ready to give your life in a war for Ukraine, not just give "valuable" advices?
West needs to provide assets to end the war by enabling Ukraine to win. All the delays, starts and stops have put us in the position we are in today coupled with a lack of will to WIN not simply hold. Remove restrictions.
It makes more sense to provide the components for Ukraine to build their own missiles- completely sidestepping Putin's threats based on the use of German or UK missiles.
The Ukranian Legion likely needs to do a recruitment drive for retired F-16 pilots. I'm positive they could find dozens of retired NATO pilots in their 30's and 40's that want to get back into the cockpit.
And ground crews etc. To be replaced with Ukrainians as they become available. Plus the foreign pilots and technicians could be given Ukrainian citizenship (and thereby having dual citizenship)
Wasn't there an army of computer hackers who tried to infiltrate Russian computer systems at the start of the war? They could be of any nationality and work from their homes around the world.
MAD is a term you should familiarize yourself with. It means Mutually Assured Destruction. So if NATO or England or the USA give these weapons to Ukraine and enable them to launch deep into Russia it means WW3. Is that what you really want? Do you want your family to be vaporized by a Nuclear Holocaust? I don't. I suggest you also ask yourself, who are the beneficiaries of this prolonged proxy war.
@@ГеннадийСеднев-м3щ "Russia has powerful air defences." Which is why none of their oil refineries have been damaged and why Ukraine has not taken any of their territory. LOL! Именно поэтому ни один из их нефтеперерабатывающих заводов не пострадал и почему Украина не захватила ни одной из их территорий. ЛОЛ!
Only around twelve trained pilots for 85 F16s? I thought I understood that there was an extensive training programme in the UK since BEFORE permission was given for Ukraine to be gifted these fighter jets.
@@PawesomeCatVideo They lost one and their best pilot already and it was in western Ukraine. They will continue to lose more the closer they get to Russia. Ask an F16 pilot what they think of Russian air defense. I fully expect Russia will turn out the lights and Ukraine is going to be ready to call it a day before they get warm again in 25
Takes two years for a NATO pilot to become certified on the F16 after completing his basic training. In war time for an experienced pilot on another aircraft it still takes a shortened 6 months course to qualify as combat ready switching between different airplanes. Yes, you dont jump into an F16 from a F15 and vice versa no matter how much of an ace you are on 1 type of airplane. Even in WW2 it took a year to train a pilot on relativaly simple prop planes before they were ready for the frontline after they finished their basic flight training.
The UK, EU and US could stop sending any aid to Ukraine and they will still have failing economies. The difference being that those economies will fail faster if Russia, and by default China, prevail in Ukraine.
Ukrainians are smart and a lot of people forget that before the breakup of the Soviet Union Ukraine had a lot of talent in aviation technologies for example Ilyushin as one example...
Drones do a good job but are much slower and easier to intercept. Consistently, drones used against air fields get the ammunition and fuel stores, but the planes almost all manage to scramble. A missile would hit the airfield well before the jets can take off, just look at what happened to Russian air fields in the occupied areas when restrictions were lifted there.
@@JabesMcJabesface It depends on the warhead which a simple search will provide. Russia has thousands and thousands of dumb bombs that have no propulsion but they weigh between 1000kg to 3000kg. It has nothing to do with the warhead it’s about dodging anti air defenses
I hate to say this, but there's a certain whiff of racism and smug superiority when pundits, talking heads, and reporters in the west talk about Ukraine 🇺🇦. These people forget about Antonov. They designed and built a huge, 6 engined transport plane to move the Soviet space Shuttle, the Buran around, or 190 tonnes. That's almost double the capacity of a Boeing C-5. Ukraine designed and built most of the Soviet Navies surface fleet. Ukraine designed and built a lot of the Soviet Unions ballistic missiles, including the SS-18 (NATO designation, Satan). I just feel that western politicians, and the western media write off Ukraine as a bunch of farmers who grow corn, wheat and sunflowers, and that's it. Their wrong. 🇬🇧❤️🇺🇦 🇺🇦🇺🇦Slava Ukraini🇺🇦🇺🇦 🇺🇦HEROIAM SLAVA🇺🇦
I am listening to plenty of pundits , journalists, historians, politicians, military retirees and experts of all kinds who support Ukraine. I have never detected even the slightest whiff of racism or smug superiority. Indeed they are doing a very good job of boosting Ukrainian history, capability and talents for warfare. Maybe you are listening to Pro-Russian pundits. I don't give them the time of day because they are IMAO evil and depraved.
Yeah - common sense. I figured the US was almost certainly helping Ukraine build their own drones and other supplying high tech components, engineering support, materials, everything else
@@AlphaGamer1981 hard to do any tech these days without high tech components … I have no doubt the Ukrainians are the world’s experts in combat drones and can do the innovative design and development. If you use some other group’s tech, you likely will need engineering support. That’s all - not taking away anything from the Ukrainians. US probably has warehouses full of useful components to share is all
Why don’t we talk about our own failure instead of talking about Zelenskyy? Why did we make so many mistakes? Putin said that this is his war with the West, not with Ukraine. We chose not to hear it. Why did we accept millions of ukrainian refugees instead of helping to accommodate them in western Ukraine? To produce anything including weapons Ukraine desperately needs these people. Why didn’t we help to protect the sky in Ukraine? What happened to our ability to think a few steps ahead? It would be cheaper to start producing missiles in Ukraine, wouldn’t it? Putin is trying hard to raise the production of weapons in Russia. So far he is quite successful in that. Where is he going to use all these weapons? Looking at the way we acted towards Ukraine after forcing the country to give up its nuclear weapons I doubt our ability to protect NATO member countries. Shouldn’t we prepare for war ourselves since we are not helping Ukraine sufficiently to stop Putin there?
Wouldn't it be a game changer if Ukraine declared that it is nuclear armed and that all of Russia is within range of its nukes? How would Putin then react?
PAY ATTENTION, PUTLER: LAUNCHING NUCLEAR BOMBS AGAINST OTHER COUNTRIES IS LIKE LAUNCHING NUCLEAR BOMBS AGAINST THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION ITSELF. DO YOU UNDERSTAND OR NEED AN EXPLANATION?
It annoys me when I hear "but we should be putting the money into problems over here." Yes, the UK has domestic problems but that's not an excuse to bury our heads in the sand. If Ukraine looses, we will be at war with Russia, if not immediately then within a small number of years. If we go to war, the UK will have far worse domestic problems. We need to help Ukraine now whilst this conflict is containable.
At this point the Rubble is at a decreasing value but with the end of the war comes a ceasing decline in value. The people will have something left to negotiate a western lifestyle that they so desire.
Annoying though it is, Russia cannot be kicked out of Ukraine completely, without NATO's direct involvement. Ukraine isn't strong enough, and whilst the missiles are striking deep inside Russia, this pain is bearable, and Putin cannot afford to back down.
So ukraine has gone from gaffa taping mortars to mavics to buildings their own balistic missiles? More like we're giving them our missiles and are too sly to admit it.
Complying with Russia"s red lines shows weakness and lets Russia know it can escalate without consequence. Ukraine would be in a stronger position if the west had supplied Ukraine earlier, especially before its counter attack last year. The west should have given Russia red lines.
You knock out each others mikitary logistics to reach a decisive position. And while Russia is doing this Ukraine can’t target military logistics deep in Russia? Insanity 🙈
Fortunately, Ukraine already has the necessary knowledge, at least about guidance and navigation, because it previously produced intercontinental missiles for the Soviet Union.
Title has nothing to do with what it discussed in the video. The missile that Ukraine has used recently to destroy the ammo depots in Russia, is a cruise missile, not a ballistic missile.
Why does it feel this bloke meandered through his whole somewhat self contradictory analysis to be able to mention he is a former fighter pilot. BTW, Ukraine has already proven it's prowess at developing new cheap accurate weapons and the tactics to deliver them. I think they are now selling airframes to the west. Maybe they will have a tech industry to help diversify their bread basket prowess. This guy seems a bit on the near sighted spectrum.
so, we have it, we don't use it, we are bothered with storing it, but we won't give it because they must do it themselves?! wth! it's not a question of encouraging a child to learn their own way, it's a question of life and death! every day people die because Ukraine doesn't have enough weapons!
interestingly the US armed forces are looking at just those points cheaper, quicker and more effectively producing large volumes of weapons especially all forms of missiles. Ukraine is proving to be a good test bed if that is the case.
Let's say Putin is ousted and Russia proposes the following peace terms. 1. Completely withdraws from Ukraine including Crimea. 2. Pays reparations. But on one condition, that Russia too will be accepted into NATO alongside Ukraine. Would that be an acceptable proposal? Why or why not?
As for me personally, I totally agree - because the thought has occurred to me, too. Soviet Union/Russia has applied or at least brought exactly this up three times in the past. The talks didn't end up accepting the Federation into NATO,though. Probably because of Russias "special rules for me" politics not too busy to start working on anti- corruption, human rights and many more subjects needed to be done before finally being accepted into NATO. But really, Russia used to be a western oriented country, an ally -, before the revolution. U der the right circumstances, I would gladly welcome Russia back.
NATO has obligations for membership: -New members must uphold democracy, including tolerating diversity. --New members must be making progress toward a market economy. --Their military forces must be under firm civilian control. --They must be good neighbors and respect sovereignty outside their borders. --They must be working toward compatibility with NATO forces Russia fails at every one of them. Thats why.
I did mention Putin ousted in this hypothetical scenario. If the west doesn't help a new Russian government transition then it won't be long until another dictator comes along
@@ardagus9917 You then need to clarify that in this scenario Putin would be ousted and *replaced with a trustworthy, western aligned leader*. Otherwise all we hear is "same dictatorship, different dictator." Then again, this scenario doesn't seem to take into account China's reaction to such proposal, for example immediate sanctions on a western allied Russia. And assuming Russia would be able to play both sides, that would lead us into a similar situation to what we currently have with Hungary and Turkey in NATO, only in this hypothetical case, we'd be talking about a much larger, nuclear armed nation. Imagine a future situation in which China decides to invade Taiwan, would Russia, as a member of NATO, opt to support America in defense of Taiwan? In conclusion, no, that would not be an acceptable proposal.
I am a UK citizen who lives on a state pension of £208 a week. I still manage to find a bit of money to help out a Ukrainian refugee friend who has a disabled son to care for. Whilst it's true that many people in the UK struggle to make ends meet, one only has to look around to see so many, many people with far more material wealth than they need. Just look at the value of people's cars, and how much people spend on holidays and alcohol. Many people are greedy and have nauseatingly high material expectations.
Finally a sane and decent person, I couldn’t agree more.
Big ups bro. Unfortunately a lot of sustained PsyOps by Putin's cult havbe led to a lot of people being so anti war they don't even want to think about it as it hurts their feelies. Meanwhile those of us who know and appreciate the horror of dictator driven war, and will contribute in any way we can to fight that.
What do you think of Ukrainian ballistic missiles? 🤣
Not at least the government spending on garbage
Well your opinion isn't everyone's opinion and why should it be.?
Putin should not be rewarded at any cost. The cost supporting Ukraine to a win is far cheaper than dealing with Russia in future.
What do you mean "Dealing with Russia in future"? Who should attack first? Do you think Russia is able to sustain a war with all NATO block? Look at the military budget. The US alone spends more than at least 10 countries in the list combined. Russian population and mobilization capabilities are way lower but for some reason they want to invade, doesn't them? What for? Of course, according to Russian doctrine it have to use nukes if it's a threat of territirial loses or even existance but who would plan a war to lose own territory or even being completely destroyed?
On my opinion, media prepares you guys for being involved in a war in this way or another. I'd be nervous if I was you.
💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯💯
We gave Ukraine only 0.34% of our GDP. LOL.
@@vegas1a We gave Ukraine only 0.34% of our GDP.
You lose the war
Support for Ukraine for as long as it takes, we should be building weapons as if we were in a war
WW3 has virtually at least started already. It's just that Ukraine is fighting it for the West by proxy.
We are at war. Ukraine is a hot spot in cold war 2.
Idiotic conversation - the west must supply everything now, without restrictions or fears … allways the cowards conversation
An idiot talking about idiocy, this is now a proxy war, Ukraine was militarily exhuseted in May 2022😂😂😂 Now NATO is being done the same, no chance of winning now they can only hope Putin is foolish enough to negotiate 😂
Perhaps but we may be wise not to announce what we supply. Why alert Russia. It can now hit targets out of reach of Storm Shadow.
I agree with the logic of suprise but I think in the case of missiles it's worth being transparent about what we supply so Russia doesn't misinterpret what's being fired at it. We should just give Ukraine ss, atacams and tomahawk and tell the Russians they only have conventional warheads and then let the Ukranians get on with it!
Ukrainians are not given the targeting keys to western advanced weapons. Hands of an American with a clearance must be inside the weapon hours before use to input the key.
This is the issue.
@@ItsReallyJackBlackHow hard is it to rekey these missiles with new codes?
Putler is losing about 1000 men per day, over 600k so far. Unsustainable. This talking head forgets that war is an accelerator for technical development, and Ukraine is very good at it in contrast to the enemy. So there will be more surprises ahead. Ukraine is now far ahead of old NATO strategies, in particular with drone warfare.
@@timthetiny7538Common sense says if you are now offering $20,000 just for signing up to some backward pig farmer from Siberia you got a man power problem Africa have cottoned on that no matter the amount it ain't worth it
Ukraine designed & manufactured Russian ballistic missiles so it is clear they are ready waiting for Quad permission to strike Russia, the drones destroyed 65kt of ammo & missile's ending the red lines so the future looks dim for Putin
Russian lives don't mean a thing to Putin the war criminal
Source?
Lol.. yeah an Ukraine only lost 30,000, maybe 35,000 till now if they are trying to make people believe?
Putin needs some of his own medicine .
No one has it
Let's say Putin is ousted and Russia proposes the following peace terms.
1. Completely withdraws from Ukraine including Crimea.
2. Pays reparations.
But on one condition, that Russia too will be accepted into NATO alongside Ukraine.
Would that be an acceptable proposal? Why or why not?
If he did Ukraine are definitely not going to deliver it.
Thoughts on the 15 to 20,000 civilians killed in the Donbas by Ukraine 2014 t0 22.?..... funded by USA $22 billion.
@@ardagus9917 In a negotiation, the loser doesnt set terms 🤦 Ukraine has nothing to offer to Russia inorder to get their lands back. bbb
@@ardagus9917 🤣 what a joke . YOU ARE FUNNY
Giving Ukraine everything it needs to win this war and Ukrainian integration into the EU and NATO is the west’s best self defense.
Getting Ukraine into Nato will start WW3
Should NATO involve directly?
NATO typically does not accept countries that are actively engaged in war because of several key reasons:
1. Article 5 Obligations: NATO's cornerstone is Article 5, which states that an attack on one member is considered an attack on all members. Admitting a country at war would immediately obligate all NATO members to defend it, potentially pulling the alliance into a direct conflict.
2. Escalation Risks: If NATO were to admit a country involved in an ongoing conflict, it risks escalating the war, as adversaries might see it as NATO's direct involvement. This could lead to broader regional or even global tensions.
3. Stability Concerns: NATO membership requires stability, both in terms of government and territorial control. Countries in active conflict may lack the necessary stability, which could complicate NATO's mission of collective defense.
4. Political Consensus: New members require unanimous approval from existing NATO members. Many NATO countries are cautious about extending membership to countries at war to avoid being drawn into conflicts they did not choose.
5. Conflict Resolution: NATO often prefers countries seeking membership to resolve ongoing conflicts before joining to avoid complicating the alliance's internal dynamics and priorities.
@@aexetanius
Unfortunately this gives Russia an incentive to invade countries.
The Russian government can look at this NATO rule and think that it's good for Russia that it invaded Ukraine, Moldova and Georgia because none of them are allowed to join NATO so long as they still have a territorial dispute over land that Russia invaded and stole from them.
Is NATO afraid of Russia.
I would like to ask, if a country invaded your country, would you be talking about giving up some of your country to the invaders for an end to their aggression? Like the Russians invading Alaska and the Americans saying for the sake of peace the invaders can keep what they took. An interesting standard for the rest of the world that is watching. We can’t depend on them nor should we for them.
USA has invaded quite a few countries. Natives had to comply. The rest of the civilized western world had to accept it.
One commentator was mentioning that a prominent and old American slogan is "Give me liberty or give me death".
The commentator was saying that it is thus strange of some Americans to tell Ukrainians that they should just give some Ukrainian territory to Russia to gain
"peace" even though it means that some Ukrainians will then be under Russian occupation and Russian oppression indefinitely.
@@terryasselstine6879 Using your logic, how would you like it if Russia and China started building defensive missile bases around your borders. And if you had agreed for them to stop. But then they just kept doing it? Would that make you feel uncomfortable? Or would you be like, nah bro, just do your thing. There is nuance here. It's not a case of Putin bad, Biden good. Look into the history of this conflict. I don't agree with Russia on their invasion. But I also don't agree that NATO should be continuously expanding and surrounding Russia. They have a free shot in Ukraine and NATO can't do anything about it. Also, please give me a justification as to why England and the USA can invade and destroy Iraq. But Russia isn't allowed to?
Skip first 60 seconds because they repeat it mid through the video which is annoying having to listen to it again
Despite consistent criticism, they continue to do this. A childish approach
The constant deja vu in the middle of these videos is maddening.
❤Ukrainians ❤
To all Ukrainians or just those who are clearly against Russia?
You have to remember that Ukraine was a big builder of weapons for Russia and those people who were designing and building those weapons. It was their rocket motors that were in the newer ICBM of the Russian military. So they can build weapons with or without the United States. Slava Ukraini
Well donr Ukraine making weapons no one expected.
"Why politically inflame russia?"
So, support Ukraine, but only up to the point where it angers that thing in the Kremlin, then stop?
Instant skip every time this clown is on.
they are going to blame the west for starting the war and escalation...anyway ...so why bother pandering ?
However I noticed that "mushroom clouds" over Russia are getting more common recently with the hits on ammo dumps. People have hardly reacted . Targetting Russian defence facilities seems easy...when a drone can travel 1000's of miles. More "mushroom clouds" over Russia is inevitable if Putin stays in power
@@billy2807
MSM uses the propaganda to reinforce the indoctrinated mistrust of Russia that stems from the Western Cold War stance.
No mention of this being a US plan for aggressive NATO expansion. Conceived in the 80s before the fall of the Berlin Wall. That Europe warned would be seen as an existential threat to Russia and result in an armed response.
The Georgia coup failed so the strong Far-Right Nationalist Ukraine regime was funded from 2014.....$22 billion.
Resulting in 15 to 20,000 civilian casualties in the pro-Russian areas that overwhelmingly voted for Russian protection.
These votes were not recognised as being legitimate and the Ukrainian genocide was ignored.
He sure is Wishy Washy.........
@@timthetiny7538 maybe. Smart people can be wrong. And, in this case, he is.
@timthetiny7538 you know what? You're right. I'll take it a step further. Sean is a fighter pilot. He served his country and has done and seen things that I never will, based on his skill, intellect, and work ethic, any or all of which may, and likely do, dwarf my own. I was wrong to call him a clown.
He's consistently wrong about russia, consistently blurts out things that aren't true, and consistently paints a picture of appeasement as a viable option. It isn't, and he's wrong every single time he says it. I'm skipping any video with him in it from now on, because he feels no need to stay in his lane.
But he's not a clown. I'm sorry I said that.
When the war is over Ukraine will be admitted into the EU, then a few yrs later NATO, one of Putins greatest achievements. 😂
Man, for those who slept last 5 years, Ukraine even changed their constitution with an article that includes Ukraine as a NATO member before the war even began (if we count 2022 as the year of its beginning of course).
Maybe the west will learn it's lesson and admit Ukraine to NATO immediately. If we would have when Ukraine first asked there would have been no invasion in 2014
@@grisallAs long as Orban is in power, Putin has veto power over NATO expansion.
Ukraine will be divided in two and the part not annexed by Russia will become a buffer state
@@grisall what if Ukraine refuse entering NATO or accept any foreign training on their territory? Don't you think Russia wouldn't be even triggered then? Somehow they managed to live in peace for decades. Ukrainian desire to enter NATO made Russia to invade. Russia claimed many times that should be a red line for them (by the way, the only time they really "drawn" a red line...apart of that journalist and politicians bullsht we heard) and they'll have to give a military response. But some smart head decided there were not serious.
If you think Ukraine should be accepted as a NATO member immediately means you should also accept consequenses. Are you ready to give your life in a war for Ukraine, not just give "valuable" advices?
pootin needs some dose of his own medicine .... May be he will going to realize that world is round and not flat.... GOD BLESS UKRAINE
This man is a major number to listen to everytime.
West needs to provide assets to end the war by enabling Ukraine to win. All the delays, starts and stops have put us in the position we are in today coupled with a lack of will to WIN not simply hold.
Remove restrictions.
It makes more sense to provide the components for Ukraine to build their own missiles- completely sidestepping Putin's threats based on the use of German or UK missiles.
We gave Ukraine only 0.34% of our GDP. LOL.
@@catinthehat906 yes long term but short term, taking our targets to save lives is critical.
War mongering fools talk
The Ukranian Legion likely needs to do a recruitment drive for retired F-16 pilots.
I'm positive they could find dozens of retired NATO pilots in their 30's and 40's that want to get back into the cockpit.
Hara-kiri pilots. Great idea.
And ground crews etc. To be replaced with Ukrainians as they become available. Plus the foreign pilots and technicians could be given Ukrainian citizenship (and thereby having dual citizenship)
Wasn't there an army of computer hackers who tried to infiltrate Russian computer systems at the start of the war?
They could be of any nationality and work from their homes around the world.
Just give Ukraine the permission. It’s mad that we won’t allow it.
Give them permission to potentially start ww3 just to satisfy Zelenskys ego ? Give ya head a wobble.....
MAD is a term you should familiarize yourself with. It means Mutually Assured Destruction. So if NATO or England or the USA give these weapons to Ukraine and enable them to launch deep into Russia it means WW3. Is that what you really want? Do you want your family to be vaporized by a Nuclear Holocaust? I don't. I suggest you also ask yourself, who are the beneficiaries of this prolonged proxy war.
It is mad that the US has to give permission for the UK to use its own weapons as it wishes.
Possible escalation and drag nato into the war
@@andrewmoore8432 And precisely what is Russia going to about it.
Russia leaves Ukraine = war ends
Ukraine will be recruiting every exF16 pilots out in the world with BIG money. Use some imagination!
И это не поможет. У России мощное ПВО. Украина обречена
@@ГеннадийСеднев-м3щ "Russia has powerful air defences." Which is why none of their oil refineries have been damaged and why Ukraine has not taken any of their territory. LOL!
Именно поэтому ни один из их нефтеперерабатывающих заводов не пострадал и почему Украина не захватила ни одной из их территорий. ЛОЛ!
@@evaluateanalysis7974 They do have very powerfull air defences, but they dont have an infinite number of them.
@@ГеннадийСеднев-м3щ Go back to sleep Ivan.
Who in their right mind would sign up. A least on the ground a mercenary can take cover, up there your on your own, and extremely vulnerable.
Yes you are right for Ukraine
Thanks T R.
🇬🇧🇺🇦
This is what’s needed. Helping Ukraine to get its own weapons projects up and running.
Ukraine is the most amazing country I’ve ever seen in my 60 years!!! Warriors. Legendary! 🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦
A man is a man amongst the universe
Show putin the window. And help him out.
Only around twelve trained pilots for 85 F16s? I thought I understood that there was an extensive training programme in the UK since BEFORE permission was given for Ukraine to be gifted these fighter jets.
Ukraine has fewer than 12 F16s on hand now. More pilots are still in training. It’s a long process.
@@Scotto_desuThe war will be over by then
@@davemccrillis1470 Modern fighter jets are the most complex machines ever built by man.
This is not a video game.
@@PawesomeCatVideo They lost one and their best pilot already and it was in western Ukraine. They will continue to lose more the closer they get to Russia. Ask an F16 pilot what they think of Russian air defense. I fully expect Russia will turn out the lights and Ukraine is going to be ready to call it a day before they get warm again in 25
Takes two years for a NATO pilot to become certified on the F16 after completing his basic training. In war time for an experienced pilot on another aircraft it still takes a shortened 6 months course to qualify as combat ready switching between different airplanes. Yes, you dont jump into an F16 from a F15 and vice versa no matter how much of an ace you are on 1 type of airplane.
Even in WW2 it took a year to train a pilot on relativaly simple prop planes before they were ready for the frontline after they finished their basic flight training.
The UK, EU and US could stop sending any aid to Ukraine and they will still have failing economies. The difference being that those economies will fail faster if Russia, and by default China, prevail in Ukraine.
Ukrainians are smart and a lot of people forget that before the breakup of the Soviet Union Ukraine had a lot of talent in aviation technologies for example Ilyushin as one example...
I think the time for Storm Shadow has been and gone. Now the long range drones are doing a great job faster cheaper made on site. Moving on.
Drones do a good job but are much slower and easier to intercept. Consistently, drones used against air fields get the ammunition and fuel stores, but the planes almost all manage to scramble. A missile would hit the airfield well before the jets can take off, just look at what happened to Russian air fields in the occupied areas when restrictions were lifted there.
Yes and no, a Storm Shadow war head has about 10 times more explosive than what these drones are carrying.
@@tavi-zx9Tik-z5yYou might want to check your facts next time
@@davemccrillis1470 but he is correct? Cruise missiles are far more powerful than drones on explosive and penetrative power
@@JabesMcJabesface It depends on the warhead which a simple search will provide. Russia has thousands and thousands of dumb bombs that have no propulsion but they weigh between 1000kg to 3000kg. It has nothing to do with the warhead it’s about dodging anti air defenses
Ukraine has an extensive nuclear industry and engineers who’ve previously worked in the atomic arms industry. Putin should be careful.
Украина уже ничего не имеет.
России нужно брать пример с Израиля.
Война до последнего Украинца😅
You go ukraine!,!
I hate to say this, but there's a certain whiff of racism and smug superiority when pundits, talking heads, and reporters in the west talk about Ukraine 🇺🇦.
These people forget about Antonov. They designed and built a huge, 6 engined transport plane to move the Soviet space Shuttle, the Buran around, or 190 tonnes. That's almost double the capacity of a Boeing C-5.
Ukraine designed and built most of the Soviet Navies surface fleet.
Ukraine designed and built a lot of the Soviet Unions ballistic missiles, including the SS-18 (NATO designation, Satan).
I just feel that western politicians, and the western media write off Ukraine as a bunch of farmers who grow corn, wheat and sunflowers, and that's it.
Their wrong.
🇬🇧❤️🇺🇦
🇺🇦🇺🇦Slava Ukraini🇺🇦🇺🇦
🇺🇦HEROIAM SLAVA🇺🇦
I am listening to plenty of pundits , journalists, historians, politicians, military retirees and experts of all kinds who support Ukraine. I have never detected even the slightest whiff of racism or smug superiority.
Indeed they are doing a very good job of boosting Ukrainian history, capability and talents for warfare.
Maybe you are listening to Pro-Russian pundits.
I don't give them the time of day because they are IMAO evil and depraved.
Yeah - common sense. I figured the US was almost certainly helping Ukraine build their own drones and other supplying high tech components, engineering support, materials, everything else
It is some young Ukrainian entrepreneur who has designed weaponised drones that they are using.
@@AlphaGamer1981 hard to do any tech these days without high tech components … I have no doubt the Ukrainians are the world’s experts in combat drones and can do the innovative design and development. If you use some other group’s tech, you likely will need engineering support. That’s all - not taking away anything from the Ukrainians. US probably has warehouses full of useful components to share is all
Good ! Ukraine’s innovation is remarkable! It’s time to build their own ballistic missiles!
Many countries go to war but in recent times one country has beaten all others hands down in its enthusiasm.
Excellent!
Why don’t we talk about our own failure instead of talking about Zelenskyy? Why did we make so many mistakes? Putin said that this is his war with the West, not with Ukraine. We chose not to hear it. Why did we accept millions of ukrainian refugees instead of helping to accommodate them in western Ukraine? To produce anything including weapons Ukraine desperately needs these people. Why didn’t we help to protect the sky in Ukraine? What happened to our ability to think a few steps ahead? It would be cheaper to start producing missiles in Ukraine, wouldn’t it? Putin is trying hard to raise the production of weapons in Russia. So far he is quite successful in that. Where is he going to use all these weapons? Looking at the way we acted towards Ukraine after forcing the country to give up its nuclear weapons I doubt our ability to protect NATO member countries. Shouldn’t we prepare for war ourselves since we are not helping Ukraine sufficiently to stop Putin there?
We need to actually support Ukraine to win, not drip out just enough to prevent them losing, and then talk them down. Talk them up, be positive.
What's this about Ukraine doesn't have pilots? That's ridiculous..
Of course there,s more to this than the public know 😊
Because you shouldn’t be scared to to do the right things
As more aid is given to Ukraine the longer the war is prosecuted and the greater the irreparable destruction of the country.
Giving in to his threats would be rewarding him...
Wouldn't it be a game changer if Ukraine declared that it is nuclear armed and that all of Russia is within range of its nukes? How would Putin then react?
So in Russia’s eyes it’s ok for China,North Korea and Iran to supply their military but not ok for the US and UK to supply Ukraine’s?
Go Ukraine
PAY ATTENTION, PUTLER: LAUNCHING NUCLEAR BOMBS AGAINST OTHER COUNTRIES IS LIKE LAUNCHING NUCLEAR BOMBS AGAINST THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION ITSELF. DO YOU UNDERSTAND OR NEED AN EXPLANATION?
I have said all along that Ukraine can build their own or just change the name on and inside the missiles and fire away ?
I'm still to hear an expert that's yet to be correct on anything concerning this war
How do u define "correct"?
you are always right of course, every day in every way.
What's "correct" in your mind?!?
It annoys me when I hear "but we should be putting the money into problems over here." Yes, the UK has domestic problems but that's not an excuse to bury our heads in the sand. If Ukraine looses, we will be at war with Russia, if not immediately then within a small number of years. If we go to war, the UK will have far worse domestic problems. We need to help Ukraine now whilst this conflict is containable.
russia has been losing for almost 3 years straight but ukraine's the one losing territory. amazing
If Ukraine creates their own missiles then that's up to them.
At this point the Rubble is at a decreasing value but with the end of the war comes a ceasing decline in value. The people will have something left to negotiate a western lifestyle that they so desire.
Who cares about the Ruble ...
Why do so many in the west think the Russians want a western lifestyle?
Don't reheat the soup. U guys posted this yesterday. Any news?
Ukraine has developed it's own skunk works. I like that. Malcolm Nance did say that Ukraine is the brains of russia.
Annoying though it is, Russia cannot be kicked out of Ukraine completely, without NATO's direct involvement. Ukraine isn't strong enough, and whilst the missiles are striking deep inside Russia, this pain is bearable, and Putin cannot afford to back down.
So ukraine has gone from gaffa taping mortars to mavics to buildings their own balistic missiles? More like we're giving them our missiles and are too sly to admit it.
F-16s and Friendly fire ? That's what IFF is for.
Complying with Russia"s red lines shows weakness and lets Russia know it can escalate without consequence.
Ukraine would be in a stronger position if the west had supplied Ukraine earlier, especially before its counter attack last year.
The west should have given Russia red lines.
You knock out each others mikitary logistics to reach a decisive position. And while Russia is doing this Ukraine can’t target military logistics deep in Russia? Insanity 🙈
Wonderful point at 4' about the nimbleness of a country at war -- as opposed to our sated, complacent, frantic about security countries in the West.
The phrase loose lips sinks ships springs to mind , or a bit of misinformation . Keep piling the stress on the bunker dwarf . Slava Ukraine 😮
Fortunately, Ukraine already has the necessary knowledge, at least about guidance and navigation, because it previously produced intercontinental missiles for the Soviet Union.
Called Putrids bluff.
It’s part of Zalenskys bargaining power to threaten Russia itself. That would really upset his people maybe enough to bargain properly
Take Trump out of the picture and Putin will have little choice but to withdraw from Ukraine.
Title has nothing to do with what it discussed in the video.
The missile that Ukraine has used recently to destroy the ammo depots in Russia, is a cruise missile, not a ballistic missile.
Why does it feel this bloke meandered through his whole somewhat self contradictory analysis to be able to mention he is a former fighter pilot. BTW, Ukraine has already proven it's prowess at developing new cheap accurate weapons and the tactics to deliver them. I think they are now selling airframes to the west. Maybe they will have a tech industry to help diversify their bread basket prowess. This guy seems a bit on the near sighted spectrum.
The Ukrainians have now got their own now just advancing their own developed rockets
so, we have it, we don't use it, we are bothered with storing it, but we won't give it because they must do it themselves?! wth! it's not a question of encouraging a child to learn their own way, it's a question of life and death! every day people die because Ukraine doesn't have enough weapons!
This whole situation is a Farce
Ukraine is developing their own, their own rocket blew a warship up
Putin will be the first ruler in history to lose a war to an opponent who defeated Russia using paper airplanes ( cardboard drones)!
Imagine....Ukraine with nukes.....Putin would not have invaded if they had them 2 1/2 years ago.......
10.35 Cheap and cheerful!
I wonder when it will end
…as Ukraine rapidly develops its own…
(Ukraine is singular.)
1.30 What is The West playing at giving Ukraine the jets and not training the pilots?!? Idiotic!
So a weeks new recruits lasts a day then you have the costs of the maimed
They could have reverse engineered the missiles
interestingly the US armed forces are looking at just those points cheaper, quicker and more effectively producing large volumes of weapons especially all forms of missiles.
Ukraine is proving to be a good test bed if that is the case.
How to end your credibility, appear on Times Radio
Putin should give up!
He never will. 😞
For the sake of his own power, he can't afford to.
mad men always get kicked out at some point
How do/can we help Ukraine expand its airman ranks so that they're trained-up on how to use the F-16s that they've been sent?
Rapidly “develops” not develop. Does anyone understand plurals these days.
Ukraine was the machine shop of the old Soviet Union they have the capabilities
🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦✌✌🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦🇺🇦
NAFO 69th Brigade new convoy
Wild Hornets drones & Pickup truck
We require a Churchill mindset here not another Chamberlin, good greif this defeatist talk !!
A taste of his own medicine😢
Like Novichok
7.00 So defeatist!
Let's say Putin is ousted and Russia proposes the following peace terms.
1. Completely withdraws from Ukraine including Crimea.
2. Pays reparations.
But on one condition, that Russia too will be accepted into NATO alongside Ukraine.
Would that be an acceptable proposal? Why or why not?
As for me personally, I totally agree - because the thought has occurred to me, too.
Soviet Union/Russia has applied or at least brought exactly this up three times in the past.
The talks didn't end up accepting the Federation into NATO,though.
Probably because of Russias "special rules for me" politics not too busy to start working on anti- corruption, human rights and many more subjects needed to be done before finally being accepted into NATO.
But really, Russia used to be a western oriented country, an ally -, before the revolution.
U der the right circumstances, I would gladly welcome Russia back.
NATO has obligations for membership:
-New members must uphold democracy, including tolerating diversity.
--New members must be making progress toward a market economy.
--Their military forces must be under firm civilian control.
--They must be good neighbors and respect sovereignty outside their borders.
--They must be working toward compatibility with NATO forces
Russia fails at every one of them. Thats why.
I did mention Putin ousted in this hypothetical scenario. If the west doesn't help a new Russian government transition then it won't be long until another dictator comes along
@@ardagus9917 You then need to clarify that in this scenario Putin would be ousted and *replaced with a trustworthy, western aligned leader*. Otherwise all we hear is "same dictatorship, different dictator."
Then again, this scenario doesn't seem to take into account China's reaction to such proposal, for example immediate sanctions on a western allied Russia. And assuming Russia would be able to play both sides, that would lead us into a similar situation to what we currently have with Hungary and Turkey in NATO, only in this hypothetical case, we'd be talking about a much larger, nuclear armed nation.
Imagine a future situation in which China decides to invade Taiwan, would Russia, as a member of NATO, opt to support America in defense of Taiwan?
In conclusion, no, that would not be an acceptable proposal.
The repetition in these videos is beyond annoying! We only need to hear it once! 😡
Are there new missles called Storm Shadow by any chance?
Ukraine can now use British and American pilot's to flight the F-16s
👍🇺🇦🇮🇪🇺🇦
Tommy do you know what
KYMZHAL does with your little island?😮😮😮😮
Nothing has worked why not get to peace talks arranged?
Lies Ukraine can't develop anything withoth help