@@danieldavismusic the gun was supposed to sound awful. The rifle is supposed to sound mighty and finely tuned. That is how you introduce an excellent weapon and it's shooter in a movie. So I would say that the sound design is excellent. I will have to check again those little "tuning" sounds of the rifle. They must had been a sound of rewinding a watch or something that fine.
Talking of sound effects... And being a Motorcyclist... I H A T E Films getting motorbike engines wrong... A single low revving THUMPER does NOT sound like a high revving FOUR, a throaty V-Twin again, sounds NOTHING like a 4 cylinder race bike... 🤨😒 And John Connors little 50/75cc didn't have a 30 speed gearbox 😏🤣 😎🇬🇧
@@thedarkknight1971 they use libraries of sound. I can get you that same "wrong" engine sound added in 10 sec. In order to get the sound of bike you want: 1. take it to studio 2. studio has to be big enough 3. record the sound and poison with gasses people in the studio 4. take the bike outside (by stairs) - most of the time And, now you have one extra sound of a bike to be used. It only took you 2h and mild CO2 poisoning to do it.
This is one of the movies that if i'm going through channels on TV and come across it, no matter where it is at in the story, i'll stop and watch the rest. One of my all time favorites.
Another reminder that Alan Rickman was one of the greatest actors of all time. Without him playing the Heel the entire movie would have been worthless.
Big agree. I staved off watching this film for the longest and regret doing so. It's a fine underrated classic with a fantastic score by the late Basil Poledouris.
Tom Selleck has CEMENTED his Greatness as 1 of the All-Time Greatest Cowboys in American History with his Performance in this Film... "QUIGLEY DOWN UNDER" is Unquestionably 1 of the Greatest Westerns of All-Time!
3:26 Not sure if the writers intended it be be seen like this but the way Rickmans character breaks Quigleys concentration was probably deliberate. In a firefight you don't have time to get "into the zone" like Quigley did in this scene so he was testing the man. Quigley understood what he was doing so he hit the bucket three times to prove a point.
@@Billy-bc8pk with his Swiss rifle from a rest correct? Again stay on point with my comment. Not some instant up to the shoulder 1000 yard shot at a bucket without accounting anything like wind, humidity, or the coriolis effect. So Ernie nor Simo are not in this conversation whatsoever.
@@GMoney1981 But if I recall, at the time this film was released at the theater, westerns were on the down and out as a genre. I always thought that that was one of the reasons it didn’t do better and instead kind of became a cult classic over time - like Blade Runner.
There was a planned sequel. Selleck gave s press conference wherr he snnounced that he was working on the classic western adventure novel by Clair Huffaker The Cowboy and the Cossack about s Texas herd of cattle driven across Siberia by cowhands. The movie never happened. The novel is unique and a treat to read.
Underutilised talent. Given Tom Selleck's looks and screen presence. Its a shame he was not offered more such rules with stellar storylines. He would have been mentioned in the same breath as the great Eastwood and Wayne if only he had been given enough chances.
@@JohnWilson-zh3il High Road to China gives us a very good look at what Selleck could have been like as Indiana Jones. The premise for the film was great, but it did kind of peter out toward the middle-end. A slightly bigger budget and better staging of the end action sequence could have put it in the cult classic category.
A great film, and one I have long lamented never got a sequel where Quigley goes to Canada in Quigley Up North, Tom Selleck and Alan Rickman were perfect in their roles.
Well many people forget, Australia had its own ‘Wild West” Frontier period, and had its own outback ‘cowboy” culture. It wasn’t just the Americans to wear a wide brimmed hat and a six-gun on their hips. Alas, much of that culture was snuffed out of the Ozzies in the 80s and 90s.. Now they’re just ‘Hot Canada”…
I really like the shootout where he’s outnumbered but has the advantage in that his rifle has a much better range than the lever guns his opponents wield, and that he’s a good shot.
Indeed it is however, creative license was used. The 110 actually has NONE of the clicks shown in the movie. The opening of the the breech, chamber of the round, closing the breech and cocking of the hammer is rather "undramatic" however, when the 108 grains of powder (in my case) goes off it's an attention getter. A very fine shooting rifle and surprisingly accurate for 1870's technology.
This movie cost me $2800……I bought a Shiloh 45/70 reproduction made in Montana, black powder…amazingly cool rifle to shoot. Even a 45/70 has a healthy kick. Worth every penny!
Imagine how much fun it was to shoot that movie with that cast. The script was pretty good. A few twists and turns, with odd characters to liven things up. Even the Aborigines were great. Still a fun movie to watch all these years later.
@otr Incorrect He was brought in for what's her name to audition with but he wasn't on the list. Selleck was already contracted for magnum and Spielberg and lucas knew that.
@@AllenNicholson-ug5fc Incorrect. Spielberg originally wanted Selleck and thought they could get him before filming began on Magnum PI with CBS due to the writer's strike, but CBS nulled that decision because they originally did want him for the role, and Spielberg told Selleck that if he didn't get him for Indiana Jones he would have something else for him after his contract was up. Selleck even talked about it at one point in an interview with David Letterman, joking he was still waiting for Spielberg's call.
@@Billy-bc8pk I have the footage of the audition with selleck and karen allen in the bonus footage dvd from raiders. Spielberg explained that they knew they were never going to get selleck. He was brought in to see how well she would interact with him, but he was never really in the running. Selleck was overly aggressive in the audition with her which Spielberg didn't like. Any possibility of selleck getting the role was gone after that.
The movie says it took Quigley 3 months to get to Australia. That means that that application was sent out a year before the movie started. Took 3 months to get to America. 3 months to get back to Australia. 3 months to send the invitation, 3 months for him to make the trip.
You can hear Alan Rickman call his rifle "The legendary Sharps rifle"; Sharps rifles were some of the best long distance rifles in the world, and are the reason we refer to snipers as Sharpshooters.
No its not! The Sharps Rifle wasn't in mass production until 1850s and way back in 1700s the Germanic regions ie Austrians and Prussians used the term scharfshutzen which is sharpshooter. Britain, around 1801 had developed a new regiment designed with expert shooters known as the 95th Rifles. Those who know of Bernard Cromwell will understand his fictitious character was Richard Sharp who served in the 95th; they were known as sharpshooters as evidenced in many chronicle records of that era and used the Baker rifle. Even Lord Nelson was reported as being shot by a sharpshooter and yet Christian Sharps has only just been born. So the term sharphooter was not from users of the Sharps Rifle but more a derivation from scharfshutzen.
Actually Tom is a very good shot, and has one of those rifles used in the movie. They are Sharps Shilo 45-110s, made in Montana and you can still get them for $4,142.00. They can shoot as described in the movie. 900 yards is not unknown, matter of fact the record was at Adobe Walls in Arizona territory and it was measured over a mile and was a 50-90 Sharps back in the day.
@@redbarchetta8782 You are absolutely correct. My brother has a Shiloh Sharps 45-70 and I have a Remington Rolling Block in the same caliber and with those Vernier sights we can consistently hit clay pots the size of that bucket easily at 1000 yards, using Black Powder Cartridges.
Veteran gun writer Phil Spangenberger advised on the film and helped steer the producers toward period-correct firearms. "I received a call from the movie’s production company, asking me what type of circa 1850s-1860s percussion breechloader could shoot accurately at over 1,000 yards. I suggested it could be easily set in the early 1870s, so they could use an 1874 Sharps metallic cartridge rifle, which was actually introduced in 1871. They liked my suggestion and asked where they could obtain such rifles."
It's funny in this movie, everybody carries guns, but this guy carries the biggest gun in the world; what a show off: the shot that heard around the world.
Not sure how far hes supposed to be shooting the bucket, but the shot grouping it showed on the newspaper at 900 yards, with that kind of gun and those kind sights, i really dont know if you could find anyone that would be capable of doing that
@@baneofbanes a 3 inch group of 5 shots at 900 yards, without the benefit of a stand and a spotter with a high powered scope. That I cant believe, I dont even think there were guns and ammo in the 1800s that were capable of that level of consistency. Very few can get groupings that tight at 900 yards with a modern rifle and a good scope
I dated a young lady when i was in my early 20s who's father was an avid shooter. He had the exact same gun as Quiqley shoots in this movie. Unfortunately he had his house sided one year and about a week after the job finished he was broken into and that gun along with several others were taken. I mentioned the siding being done because he lives in a very rural area extremely unlikely it was random. Also the company eas out of the Detroit area,and he never vot any of the guns back,but a couple years later he was contacted because one of them was used in a homicide in Detroit.
some cool facts about the film: The firearm used by Quigley (Selleck) is a custom 13.5 pound (6 kg), single-shot, 1874 Sharps Rifle, with a 34-inch (860 mm) barrel. The rifle used for filming was a replica manufactured for the film by the Shiloh Rifle Manufacturing Company of Big Timber, Montana. In 2002 Selleck donated the rifle, along with six other firearms from his other films, to the "Real Guns of Reel Heroes" exhibit at the National Firearms Museum in Fairfax, Virginia. The film was shot entirely in Australia. Scenes were filmed in and around Warrnambool and Apollo Bay, Victoria. Although several scenes of the story depict violence and cruelty toward and involving animals, a film spokesperson explained that no animal was harmed, and special effects were used. For example, Quigley and Cora are reduced to consuming "grub worms" (actually blobs of dough) for survival. A pack of dingoes attacks Cora, and she finally saves herself by shooting the animals. Those animals were specially trained, and were actually "playing" for that scene, which was later enhanced by visual and sound effects. Several scenes involve falling horses; they were performed by specially-trained animals and were not hurt. When a horse falls off a cliff, the "horse" was a mechanical creation. The film's producer stated that a veterinarian was on the set whenever animals were being used in filming.
Great movie, but what the heII did Quigley think he was being hired for? He says right up front that he knows he wasn't hired to shoot wolves and dingoes. So he sailed half way around the world for a job that he absolutely knew was going to involve doing something he wouldn't be willing to do.
I wish people would learn that the word marksman is not a description of a bullseye shooter. Marksman is the LOWEST proficiency rating, a passing grade. If you can competently load your weapon and get the bullets downrange in the general direction of the target, you are rated a marksman. If you can get most of your bullets within the outer perimeter of the target, you are rated sharpshooter. If you can hit the bullseye on a regular basis, you are rated expert. Quigley is an expert rifleman, far better than any marksman.
snagging the bucket and jumping the fence first try is also quite impressive
Looks like several cuts, he probably had as many tries as it took for each. (Unless there's released behind the scenes trivia I haven't seen).
@@FreddyJedd nah it was one take in quigleys world
Yeah, there should have been a Finest Horseman in The World spinoff.
Australia does not have cowboys, we have stockmen. Also known as Jackaroos and Jillaroos.
Have you ever seen The Man from Snowy River?
Perfect way to introduce the hero. Just enough exposition, a display, and the point comes across mighty fast that person is SPECIAL.
Yes indeed! A classic example of "show, don't tell."
@@betterinsodapop bingo
Not just the person, but the weapon as well. Kind of like King Arthur and Excalibur.
This scene is an example of excellent foley. Those rifle clicks are on point.
Excellent foley and terrible sound design haha. the gunshots (especially the signal pistol) were awful.
@@danieldavismusic the gun was supposed to sound awful. The rifle is supposed to sound mighty and finely tuned.
That is how you introduce an excellent weapon and it's shooter in a movie. So I would say that the sound design is excellent.
I will have to check again those little "tuning" sounds of the rifle. They must had been a sound of rewinding a watch or something that fine.
Talking of sound effects... And being a Motorcyclist...
I H A T E Films getting motorbike engines wrong... A single low revving THUMPER does NOT sound like a high revving FOUR, a throaty V-Twin again, sounds NOTHING like a 4 cylinder race bike... 🤨😒 And John Connors little 50/75cc didn't have a 30 speed gearbox 😏🤣 😎🇬🇧
@@thedarkknight1971 they use libraries of sound. I can get you that same "wrong" engine sound added in 10 sec.
In order to get the sound of bike you want:
1. take it to studio
2. studio has to be big enough
3. record the sound and poison with gasses people in the studio
4. take the bike outside (by stairs) - most of the time
And, now you have one extra sound of a bike to be used. It only took you 2h and mild CO2 poisoning to do it.
@@maxmagnus777 y'know you can just take a microphone to the bike, right?
This is one of the movies that if i'm going through channels on TV and come across it, no matter where it is at in the story, i'll stop and watch the rest. One of my all time favorites.
I was watching it last night on GRIT
this was a great role for Rickman.
Rip Alan Rickman
Rickman was great in any role, I reckon
Another reminder that Alan Rickman was one of the greatest actors of all time. Without him playing the Heel the entire movie would have been worthless.
And the movies Die Hard, Robin Hood: Prince of Thieves, and Galaxy Quest.
Truly it was a sad day when we had to give ten points to Gryffindor.
A hero is only as good as his nemesis. Batman proved that time and again.
@@jonf2009 agreed, Gryffindor is classless while Slytherin had Alan Rickman
Guess you haven’t heard of Tom Selleck
One of the most underappreciated movies of all time.
I agree. So much I traveled to Perth, Australia where some of the opening scenes were shot. Beautiful film
Big agree. I staved off watching this film for the longest and regret doing so. It's a fine underrated classic with a fantastic score by the late Basil Poledouris.
OF ALL TIME
@@elmatasesues3630 ALL TIME u say?
Humble brag detected!
Translation: "Everyone please take SPECIAL note of my above average appreciation of movies!"
Tom Selleck AND Alan Rickman in the same movie shot in Australia! 🎉
I'm happy to know he's now gainfully employed. I see longevity in this business relationship.
After seeing that Tom Selleck, was & is one of the GOAT western Actor's there ever was or is. Thanks.
One of them
This was set in Australia.
@@sheehan92And?
@@sheehan92 I guess that would make it the... southwest?
Quiet, young one. Clint Eastwood is the best.
Alan Rickman... MUCH RESPECT & RIP
Tom Selleck... Himself, a SOLID actor...
Quigley Down Under... UNDERRATED film... 👍
😎🇬🇧
Brilliant film as ever Alan Rickman the best arch enemy.
Alan Rickman played a great villain, another couple of examples are Die Hard and Robin Hood.
Tom Selleck has CEMENTED his Greatness as 1 of the All-Time Greatest Cowboys in American History with his Performance in this Film... "QUIGLEY DOWN UNDER" is Unquestionably 1 of the Greatest Westerns of All-Time!
Chill, dude, this movie came out decades ago. There's no need to advertise for it.
Is this a Western, or a "southern", considering they are in Australia?
I love Quigley but my favorite is Monty Walsh
Also this actor with rifle have cool movie about jail.
@@VITAS874 What?
3:26 Not sure if the writers intended it be be seen like this but the way Rickmans character breaks Quigleys concentration was probably deliberate. In a firefight you don't have time to get "into the zone" like Quigley did in this scene so he was testing the man. Quigley understood what he was doing so he hit the bucket three times to prove a point.
From the shoulder with iron sights. Lol, good thing it's a movie and not a real "fire fight".
@@GMoney1981*Simo Hayha has entered the chat*
@@GMoney1981 *Ernest Jimenez has entered the chat*
@@Billy-bc8pk with his Swiss rifle from a rest correct? Again stay on point with my comment. Not some instant up to the shoulder 1000 yard shot at a bucket without accounting anything like wind, humidity, or the coriolis effect. So Ernie nor Simo are not in this conversation whatsoever.
Has more to do with teeing off on a golf course than it would with a "firefight". Sniping is all about getting in the zone and setting up the shot.
I love this movie. One of my favorite westerns. ❤
Hans Gruber's great grandfather.
Cursed linage then….😂
😂😂
🤣
Honestly , wish all job interviews went like that
Absolutely loved this movie. Really wanted one of those Sharpes rifles after I saw it,.................until I saw the price. WOW.
They’re around $3000 and up?
SUCH a good movie. They don't make great movies like this anymore.
Subjective, of course. But in reality, there have been many great Westerns since this film came out. Let alone films in general.
@@GMoney1981 But if I recall, at the time this film was released at the theater, westerns were on the down and out as a genre. I always thought that that was one of the reasons it didn’t do better and instead kind of became a cult classic over time - like Blade Runner.
There was a planned sequel. Selleck gave s press conference wherr he snnounced that he was working on the classic western adventure novel by Clair Huffaker The Cowboy and the Cossack about s Texas herd of cattle driven across Siberia by cowhands. The movie never happened. The novel is unique and a treat to read.
Underutilised talent. Given Tom Selleck's looks and screen presence. Its a shame he was not offered more such rules with stellar storylines. He would have been mentioned in the same breath as the great Eastwood and Wayne if only he had been given enough chances.
If you haven’t seen it I recommend another Tom selleck movie “High Road to China”.
@@JohnWilson-zh3il High Road to China gives us a very good look at what Selleck could have been like as Indiana Jones. The premise for the film was great, but it did kind of peter out toward the middle-end. A slightly bigger budget and better staging of the end action sequence could have put it in the cult classic category.
A great film, and one I have long lamented never got a sequel where Quigley goes to Canada in Quigley Up North, Tom Selleck and Alan Rickman were perfect in their roles.
Sometimes there’s just one good telling of a good story
Tom's first movie with Australian director Simon Wincer (Lonesome Dove), a master of an American genre.
Well many people forget, Australia had its own ‘Wild West” Frontier period, and had its own outback ‘cowboy” culture. It wasn’t just the Americans to wear a wide brimmed hat and a six-gun on their hips.
Alas, much of that culture was snuffed out of the Ozzies in the 80s and 90s.. Now they’re just ‘Hot Canada”…
Such a great movie. Pure Tom Selleck and pure Alan Rickman.
This is my favorite part of the movie, and is my favorite movie with Tom Selleck, this also has the best bad guy all time to, Alan Rickman.....
I really like the shootout where he’s outnumbered but has the advantage in that his rifle has a much better range than the lever guns his opponents wield, and that he’s a good shot.
3:11 The sounds are so satisfying.
That 45/110 is a thumper!
Indeed it is however, creative license was used. The 110 actually has NONE of the clicks shown in the movie. The opening of the the breech, chamber of the round, closing the breech and cocking of the hammer is rather "undramatic" however, when the 108 grains of powder (in my case) goes off it's an attention getter. A very fine shooting rifle and surprisingly accurate for 1870's technology.
Where oh where have the good movies gone, oh where oh where can they be?
This is easily in the top 3 tier for best scene in Western movies of all time.
We need somebody to get a message to Tom Selleck, give us one more quickly before he retires! BIG JAKE STYLE.....
One very good movie. If you haven’t seen it, it would be worth it!
Alan Rickman always reminded of the movie Die Hard. He played the villian role quite well.
One of my favorite characters he played
Сентябрь, 2024, 😎👍🏻.
Аж олдскулы свело...
Друг,как фильм называется на русском языке?Ответь, пожалуйста.😊
@@ЕленаСтельмах-й7м "Куигли в Австралии", 1990.
@@alexkotov4010 спасибо за ответ!
@@ЕленаСтельмах-й7м 😎👍🏻
“Mr. Quigley… our new celebrity.”
Not many know but a young Ben Mendelsohn got his start in this film
Die beste Scene die ich je in einem Westernfilm gesehen habe !!! 🧐👍💪
one of my fav westerns of all time
Sellek was amazing in westerns back in the day!
One of the greatest scenes in film history.
One of my favorite westerns of all time.
This movie cost me $2800……I bought a Shiloh 45/70 reproduction made in Montana, black powder…amazingly cool rifle to shoot. Even a 45/70 has a healthy kick. Worth every penny!
Imagine how much fun it was to shoot that movie with that cast. The script was pretty good. A few twists and turns, with odd characters to liven things up. Even the Aborigines were great. Still a fun movie to watch all these years later.
Underated flick. Bet I watched it 100x as a kid.
Fun fact. Tom Selleck was the first choice for Indiana Jones
@otr
Incorrect
He was brought in for what's her name to audition with but he wasn't on the list. Selleck was already contracted for magnum and Spielberg and lucas knew that.
@@AllenNicholson-ug5fc Wrong. Google 'Tom Selleck Indiana Jones'.
@@AllenNicholson-ug5fc Incorrect. Spielberg originally wanted Selleck and thought they could get him before filming began on Magnum PI with CBS due to the writer's strike, but CBS nulled that decision because they originally did want him for the role, and Spielberg told Selleck that if he didn't get him for Indiana Jones he would have something else for him after his contract was up. Selleck even talked about it at one point in an interview with David Letterman, joking he was still waiting for Spielberg's call.
@@Billy-bc8pk I have the footage of the audition with selleck and karen allen in the bonus footage dvd from raiders. Spielberg explained that they knew they were never going to get selleck. He was brought in to see how well she would interact with him, but he was never really in the running. Selleck was overly aggressive in the audition with her which Spielberg didn't like. Any possibility of selleck getting the role was gone after that.
@@AllenNicholson-ug5fcincorrect
As a card carrying member of the extended Quigley family I approve this footage. Stay out of jail guy's.
1200 yards would be a crazy shot even today with a modern scope sitting prone
That group on the page is what, a little over 3”? That’s 1/3 MOA at 900 yards with irons. That’s almost super human.
@@GregHuttonyall.aint ever used aperture sights. Its cute
@@hiddenfrogsnatcher4796what does the fact its an aperture sight have to do with anything?
people really don't appreciate the acting performance of that bucket enough.
wind blew the dirt to his right then the weather vain showed it going the opposite direction.
The movie says it took Quigley 3 months to get to Australia. That means that that application was sent out a year before the movie started. Took 3 months to get to America. 3 months to get back to Australia. 3 months to send the invitation, 3 months for him to make the trip.
2:28 *starts walking up all the way to the target, and shoots it point blank* . On a side note that sharps sounds really good
You can hear Alan Rickman call his rifle "The legendary Sharps rifle"; Sharps rifles were some of the best long distance rifles in the world, and are the reason we refer to snipers as Sharpshooters.
No its not! The Sharps Rifle wasn't in mass production until 1850s and way back in 1700s the Germanic regions ie Austrians and Prussians used the term scharfshutzen which is sharpshooter.
Britain, around 1801 had developed a new regiment designed with expert shooters known as the 95th Rifles. Those who know of Bernard Cromwell will understand his fictitious character was Richard Sharp who served in the 95th; they were known as sharpshooters as evidenced in many chronicle records of that era and used the Baker rifle.
Even Lord Nelson was reported as being shot by a sharpshooter and yet Christian Sharps has only just been born. So the term sharphooter was not from users of the Sharps Rifle but more a derivation from scharfshutzen.
Quigley is the best marksman in the world because Hollywood said so.
Actually Tom is a very good shot, and has one of those rifles used in the movie. They are Sharps Shilo 45-110s, made in Montana and you can still get them for $4,142.00. They can shoot as described in the movie. 900 yards is not unknown, matter of fact the record was at Adobe Walls in Arizona territory and it was measured over a mile and was a 50-90 Sharps back in the day.
@@redbarchetta8782 You are absolutely correct. My brother has a Shiloh Sharps 45-70 and I have a Remington Rolling Block in the same caliber and with those Vernier sights we can consistently hit clay pots the size of that bucket easily at 1000 yards, using Black Powder Cartridges.
Crazy shot considering he didn’t lay prone, that he stood for it.
Awesome movie
One Of The Best Scenes In Movie' 👍👍👍🤠🤠🤠
Really think that whole theatre of testing the wind and preparing was Quigley giving the rider time to get out of his shot. Gun safety first.
Testing the wind might be theater, but it also let him see how fast and what direction the wind was moving
The guy on the horse is the most impressive one because he actually did it.
Hands down one of the most mythical scene the MGM ever produced.
the lack of cap on this cap-lock rifle hurts my soul... seems like a nice movie though
Veteran gun writer Phil Spangenberger advised on the film and helped steer the producers toward period-correct firearms. "I received a call from the movie’s production company, asking me what type of circa 1850s-1860s percussion breechloader could shoot accurately at over 1,000 yards. I suggested it could be easily set in the early 1870s, so they could use an 1874 Sharps metallic cartridge rifle, which was actually introduced in 1871. They liked my suggestion and asked where they could obtain such rifles."
Total classic!
Für alle Frauen ein echter Mann wie aus einem Bilderbuch !!!
Severus Snape at it again.
This is a great gun in Hunt Showdown and has always been my favorite.
Hi
Best film , best rifle and Thomas Selleck. :)
I loved this movie when I was a kid!! I saw it in The theaters
자막 보기 전 까지 도둑이 양동이 훔쳐 달아나는 줄 알았고 주인공이 도망가는 남자 쏴 죽이는 줄 알았어ㅋㅋㅋ
Fantastic movie
Alan Rickman... outstanding actor
double triggers helped so much🤣
The double triggers are there to a) Reduce the draw on the trigger required for the shot, and b) stop the gun from accidentally going off.
"An experimental weapon with experimental. Let's experiment then Mr Potter."
Severus Snape dont die, he traveled to XIX century :D
Snipin's a good job, mate!
Amazing movie and scene I've watched tons
It's funny in this movie, everybody carries guns, but this guy carries the biggest gun in the world; what a show off: the shot that heard around the world.
Never second guess the power of the mustache..
Are there people that can make that shot ? In that time and this time? Without using a stand
Yes
Not sure how far hes supposed to be shooting the bucket, but the shot grouping it showed on the newspaper at 900 yards, with that kind of gun and those kind sights, i really dont know if you could find anyone that would be capable of doing that
@@troy9327 people have made the shot in real life.
@@baneofbanes a 3 inch group of 5 shots at 900 yards, without the benefit of a stand and a spotter with a high powered scope. That I cant believe, I dont even think there were guns and ammo in the 1800s that were capable of that level of consistency. Very few can get groupings that tight at 900 yards with a modern rifle and a good scope
I really think the only character exposition that’s been done in a movie is when Viggo punches his son and explains what he’s done in John Wick.
I dated a young lady when i was in my early 20s who's father was an avid shooter. He had the exact same gun as Quiqley shoots in this movie. Unfortunately he had his house sided one year and about a week after the job finished he was broken into and that gun along with several others were taken. I mentioned the siding being done because he lives in a very rural area extremely unlikely it was random. Also the company eas out of the Detroit area,and he never vot any of the guns back,but a couple years later he was contacted because one of them was used in a homicide in Detroit.
Yes, originally from up-over
Dude was handsome af back in the day
Is that professor SNAPE?
Great movie!
4:00 Jeremy Allen White in one of his earliest roles.
By Grabthar's Hammer, you're hired.
Un fusil fantastique le Sharp's
Oh Richard and Snape
experiments, create legends.
great western
Nunca más vi hermosas películas como esta.
Finest marksman? Probably. Compared to other fictional marksmen. Still, a great movie.
some cool facts about the film:
The firearm used by Quigley (Selleck) is a custom 13.5 pound (6 kg), single-shot, 1874 Sharps Rifle, with a 34-inch (860 mm) barrel. The rifle used for filming was a replica manufactured for the film by the Shiloh Rifle Manufacturing Company of Big Timber, Montana. In 2002 Selleck donated the rifle, along with six other firearms from his other films, to the "Real Guns of Reel Heroes" exhibit at the National Firearms Museum in Fairfax, Virginia. The film was shot entirely in Australia. Scenes were filmed in and around Warrnambool and Apollo Bay, Victoria.
Although several scenes of the story depict violence and cruelty toward and involving animals, a film spokesperson explained that no animal was harmed, and special effects were used. For example, Quigley and Cora are reduced to consuming "grub worms" (actually blobs of dough) for survival. A pack of dingoes attacks Cora, and she finally saves herself by shooting the animals. Those animals were specially trained, and were actually "playing" for that scene, which was later enhanced by visual and sound effects. Several scenes involve falling horses; they were performed by specially-trained animals and were not hurt. When a horse falls off a cliff, the "horse" was a mechanical creation. The film's producer stated that a veterinarian was on the set whenever animals were being used in filming.
Here we see the very first Vindicare in history.
"Fast is fine, but accuracy is final."
Eski zaman sniperı 🤠
Hans Gruber always a great villain.
I’ve never seen him a day in my life!… Only my Roy can hit a coyote that far away!
I asked a CNN anchor to tell me what Quigley's gun is. They said its an Eh-ar fifteen.
Hey you got the job man.
Great movie, but what the heII did Quigley think he was being hired for? He says right up front that he knows he wasn't hired to shoot wolves and dingoes. So he sailed half way around the world for a job that he absolutely knew was going to involve doing something he wouldn't be willing to do.
I wish people would learn that the word marksman is not a description of a bullseye shooter. Marksman is the LOWEST proficiency rating, a passing grade. If you can competently load your weapon and get the bullets downrange in the general direction of the target, you are rated a marksman.
If you can get most of your bullets within the outer perimeter of the target, you are rated sharpshooter.
If you can hit the bullseye on a regular basis, you are rated expert.
Quigley is an expert rifleman, far better than any marksman.
1. Eine Sharps hat keine nach vorn verjüngten Hülsen. ". Das Nachladen dauer etwas länger und er hatte keine Zündtütchen drauf.