Dam, I know it gets a bad rap but Pro400h does slap at night photography and it is so much more affordable than portra and has great dynamic range, I was really glad it was there, it was always a decent alternative to portra.
Thanks for reminding, just bought three more boxes of this film. Yes, it jumped quite a bit in price (€33 last year to €49 right now) but here it still is cheaper than any Kodak colour film. It's not only cheaper but more important I do also like Fuji more.
Re: Fuji Greens - given how they render greens in all of their digital film simulations, especially Classic Chrome, yeah. Fuji knows what it's doing with its color science. Also, Provia still exists, get it while you can.
I just walked into my local camera shop and found a stash of 400h on the shelf. Needless to say the shelf looks very empty now. I love this stuff at 200iso. I don't care if it really is or isn't 200iso it just looks good like that but then I also like portra 400 at 200iso so ...
As someone who just wrote a huge essay on the Gamuts of color films, it would be fascinating to see how that Cyan sensitive layer affects the colors. Thanks for the video
@@JonnyRobbie You mean to the research? I do, but the issue is it's not complete, I only examined spectral sensitivity of the sensitive layers but not spectral density of the color dyes themselves.
@@chrisbruinsma4384 I've created a plugin to simulate RA-4 prints (and bw too), though it was only from official datasheets and not from real world gathering. I was wondering if your research might help me figure out if I've made any mistake in my model.
@@JonnyRobbie It's possible it could, although I'm not sure because it doesn't actually define what colors the film produces only what amplitude it is sensitive to at minimum.
I work at a camera shop and this dude brings in his old RB67 to try to sell to us. Come to find out he has a bag filled with tmax, tri-x and fuji pro 400H. Bought 19 rolls of 400H for $15 lolol
every time i watch any of your videos i immediately want to load my camera with film and take photos then forget that i live in north carolina and there isn't anything to take photos of, unless i want to take photos of lifted trucks
You have to use a roll for night photography, I did a series shooting neon signs at night/ dawn in old neighborhoods around Seattle. 400h was my choice film stock for this project because of the cooler rendition. I did see a lot of green casting within the mid tones and shadows of shots that were illuminated by incandescent bulbs, but that was easily correctable in the scanning process.
I think it's a film that performs outstandingly well in very precise conditions, but that is slightly less good for general use (although I still always manage to make it look exactly how I want, it just often requires a little bit more editing work). I was visiting Marseille in the south of France this fall and Pro 400H worked amazingly well with the earthy and already quite warm tones of this very Mediterranean setting. The teal blue sky of Portra with the yellow accents on already pretty yellow buildings never really looked right for me and I ended up always trying to replicate the rather desaturated look of the Pro 400H rolls I shot at the same place. Though, for that very same reason, I would not recommend shooting Pro 400H in very colourful scenarios if you have other options. Earlier, I was shooting it in Lille in northern France and the results weren't quite as successful, notably due to the more vivid colour palet of the place (where Lomo 800 and Portra 400 were doing a great job). The other huge selling point for me was the price. While Portra is, I believe, a slightly better film, it is certainly not worth 1,5 times the price of Pro 400H. Here in Montreal, a roll of Pro 400H in 120 go for around 10CA$ while Portra is generally hovering more towards 16CA$ (though I know of a place that sells it for less than 14CA$!). Given my limited budget, I would go 7/10 times for Pro 400H. I find the lost of this film stock to be a tragedy because it robs me of my main source of cheap yet excellent 120 colour film that I can afford to shoot casually without being too bothered for wasting a frame or two (and I already shoot 645 for that same budget reason). Edit : wording and spelling
That pre-stickied end of the roll sticker always makes me think of that famous Japanese attention to detail, just that extra little bit of thoughtfulness
Where is Ektachrome christmas? And talking about Pro 400h being able to mitigate strange color casts under artificial light, Nick Carver said in a video (the one about the 80s where he shoots in an abandoned shopping center) that he really likes Pro 400h for shooting indoors
I think it’s important to state that the look of your film pictures is only half determined by the film you shoot. The other half if the display prep. That is, how you scan or print your negatives to be looked at as a final image. The only inherent look a color negative film can have, or maybe it’s better put by saying: the look a color negative film is being designed towards by the manufacturer, is for the developed neg to be printed onto photochemical paper in a darkroom or a lab. That is where the ASA ratings on the packaging stem from. Because the black point on a print doesn’t need to be so low, because the paper itself subtracts light. So the negative can be a bit less dense. We love the Fuji Frontier scanners because they can by themselves be somewhat close to the look of Fuji‘s DP II paper. There’re ways to calibrate them to look pretty much exactly like a print. And Negative Lab Pro also has ways to bring you pretty close to that look. Everything else is variation and does not serve as a benchmark to judge a films look. Unless Jason would provide us with the exact scanning settings he used for those pictures, it’s save to say that the Portra 400 to Pro 400H comparison is not conclusive.
Hey I’ve just got to say that these videos over the past 2 years have been one of the biggest uplifts of my life. These past 2 years I’ve been working on the frontline of covid here in the UK like many others and lately I have been wearing thin and watching you’re videos helps encourage me to keep going out and doing the thing I love most when at times I just wish to lay in bed to hope the world will just move past to leave me behind so I can rest. I really can’t count the amount of times I’ve watched you’re videos that make me laugh when I don’t feel like i have it in me, inspire me when I think I can’t and calm me with your amazing talent as a photographer calms the soul while also inspiring me to try be a greater photographer. Plus the bromance between you and Caleb is always absolutely brilliant the beautiful beast😂. Hope you and to all that watch your inspiring videos have had an amazing Christmas and a happy new year
I work at a photo lab and 400h in 120 is the best to load! The tape is so much better then Portra and it’s so much easier to open in the dark bag. It will be missed!
once i slapped a roll of kodak gold in my 67 instead of pro400H, that ruined the beach photo shoot and the relationship between me and my girlfriend. So the question is lightroom the shit out of the kodak gold to mimic fuji color, or just send to receipt to her everytime i buy another roll of 400H, is more healthy to my relationship, or my mental health
I really hope fuji eventually brings back Pro400H! I shot a couple rolls in Joshua Tree National Park on my channel and the images came out amazing! Your images in this one were sooo good dude
Thanks for another interesting video! I had similar experiences with Pro 400, the 35mm version. When I saw the results of my first attempt, shot at boxspeed, I asked myself if I am too stupid to shoot film or if this film might be a little overhyped. But when I tried it a second time, shot at ISO 200 it looked much more interesting and - as you’ve said - pretty similar to Portra 400 shot at ISO 200. Maybe Pro 400 renders colors a tiny bit cooler but all in all, both film stocks are quite similar. By the way, the photos you took on your little trip look really good👍.
@@felixnurscher6017 I would recommend to wait for a sunny day. If you are, like me, living in the northern hemisphere, those cloudy, grey and dark winter days are not very well suited for Pro 400. But if you wait for one of these rare clear, cold and sunny winter days this film stock might sing for you!
As a film shooter primarily, what is your opinion on film simulations on modern digital cameras like Fuji? I personally like it but is it “cheating” in your eyes? Love the videos dude
While Ilford does produce Acros II (and some other brand’s BW films like Rollei) its chemical formulation is still Fujifilm’s. Pro 400H was really good under tungsten light. Definitely better than Portra 400 is. Fuji Superia 400 ditched the fourth color layer in 2018 to be easier to produce. But it’s still the most versatile consumer film and actually the second best stills film in tungsten light after CineStill 800T. It can still produce a more natural representation of tungsten light than any of Kodak’s films. It’s also currently the best bang for the buck film now. At 400 you’ll get somewhat green shadows and a more muted image. It looks pretty natural at 320 and has a nice punch at 250. At 200 it really starts to pop. It’s really nice to have an alternative to the warm look of the Kodak films and that can produce some good looking magenta skin tones. Since Pro 400H is gone, Superia 400 is my go to if I want something different. And just you know I have booth rolls of Natura 1600 and a significant other and I hold both of them close.
RIP Superia. It was because of this comment that I learned to love Superia by shooting it at 320 and below. Now it's been replaced with Ultramax... Joining Fuji C200 as a film replaced by a Kodak offering. Admittedly, I have seen some results and it seems to be slightly cooler than Ultramax. Why Fuji just can't offer up their formulation, I dunno. Maybe chemical/mechanical differences on the production lines?
@@LaskyLabs I think it’d just be too much work for Kodak at that price. Also why make a better film than their own for a competing brand? But it doesn’t seem to all dead just yet. At least in Japan production just seems paused. Also the new “Fujifilm” 400 isn’t quite the same as the current Ultramax, not like “Fujifilm” 200 is just Gold.
@@VariTimo I'm hearing that it's closer to Lomo 400, or an older variant of Ultramax. Admittedly I've seen that it is a little cooler. I need to try it myself before I can say for certain though.
@@LaskyLabs Yeah something like that is probably the case. The spec sheet looks a lot like an older version of Ultramax from before the 2007 update. But the reds are different.
Oh thats one way to start a vid. wow. RIP pro400H. I think overexposing it, is the only way to shoot it. Havn't been a fan of many photos I have taken with 400h. Loalding ASMR video coming soon? Oh 200 iso, I will shoot my last two rolls at 200 after seeing these images. They do look better overall. I do hold my Natura 1600 really close nightly. Baxter has a nice rack. Great video per usual.
Kyle McDougall did one of his famous exposure latitude tests on Pro400h several years ago. Based on his results, he also determined that Pro400h looks best when exposed at ISO 200. Thus, I have only ever shot this film at ISO 200. And I will say that Pro400h in 35mm doesn't look nearly as nice as when shot in 120 format, even if both are shot +1 stop overexposed.
There is money to be made still with film. Is there money to be made with Fuji Pro 400H, no. Is there money to be made with a pro grade 400 asa film stock, yes. Will Fuji let Kodak take the entire market creating a monopoly on prices for 400 speed film, probably not. I expect Fuji to Rerelease Pro 400H in a new format that is cheaper to manufacturer and perhaps with a simpler chemical composition. There is a high chance that Fuji may not bring out a replacement and there is an even higher chance that if a replacement is brought out that it won't be the same or some might say it will not be as good as Pro 400H.
You can still buy Fuji Pro 400h at B&H in the us or at Amazon Japan. It’s got a look and worth having a few rolls. I think it looks best with portraits
It could just be me, but I get the feeling that if you just made videos about your going’s on without anything to do with film, you’d get a lot of views. Just a nicely narrated recount of the shit you’ve been up to.
thanks for great video...I was able to snag the last run of Fuji 400H in Shibuya/Tokyo last week glad to hear that I was the last person to buy the last stock cant decide where to shoot it though.....
I made a comment on Reddit the other day about the F3 having a Vasiliy slap and no one got the reference. The slap in the begging of this video triggered those terrible memories.
Can you fill us in on how your process of scanning 400H has changed. As you mentioned at the start years ago you had bad results and it could be lab dependent. Just interested in how you changed to get the right results
Yo, I live in CO Springs! There are a lot of cool older buildings, old cars and other relics of the later 20th century around here. I think it's a place that really fits your style. If you're ever back you should drive the 45min or so out to Victor/Cripple Creek for some true old mountain town stuff. Also of course Pikes Peak and Cheyenne Canyon are good opportunities
The only thing 400h offered to me was keeping portra prices in check. Now look at us.
accurate :D
When the world needed him most, depressed Walmart Ryan gosling left the clearance rack to give us this banger
Jason and Caleb should really make a Drive spoof film.
I am addicted to Jason’s videos.
I'm addicted to you
@@grainydaysss 😏
I’m not addicted. I can stop whenever I want ; I just don’t want to ever stop watching.
Hi everyone and I’m also addicted to Jason’s videos
So am I!
Dam, I know it gets a bad rap but Pro400h does slap at night photography and it is so much more affordable than portra and has great dynamic range, I was really glad it was there, it was always a decent alternative to portra.
Gone now though so it’s a moot point.
I've stocked up with a dozen rolls.. I love this film!
A dozen??? Where do you find the money for this
@@nathanr4633 I bought them from my local lab at about 9 euro a piece a couple of years ago.
Thanks for reminding, just bought three more boxes of this film. Yes, it jumped quite a bit in price (€33 last year to €49 right now) but here it still is cheaper than any Kodak colour film. It's not only cheaper but more important I do also like Fuji more.
The shot at 10:09 is just ooooooo so good
*epic slap* = instant upvote. Solid content strategy.
Just what I wanted for Christmas
I love that shot at 10:10
Re: Fuji Greens - given how they render greens in all of their digital film simulations, especially Classic Chrome, yeah. Fuji knows what it's doing with its color science.
Also, Provia still exists, get it while you can.
I just walked into my local camera shop and found a stash of 400h on the shelf. Needless to say the shelf looks very empty now. I love this stuff at 200iso. I don't care if it really is or isn't 200iso it just looks good like that but then I also like portra 400 at 200iso so ...
As someone who just wrote a huge essay on the Gamuts of color films, it would be fascinating to see how that Cyan sensitive layer affects the colors. Thanks for the video
got a link?
@@JonnyRobbie You mean to the research? I do, but the issue is it's not complete, I only examined spectral sensitivity of the sensitive layers but not spectral density of the color dyes themselves.
@@chrisbruinsma4384 I've created a plugin to simulate RA-4 prints (and bw too), though it was only from official datasheets and not from real world gathering. I was wondering if your research might help me figure out if I've made any mistake in my model.
@@JonnyRobbie It's possible it could, although I'm not sure because it doesn't actually define what colors the film produces only what amplitude it is sensitive to at minimum.
You need to try Fuji Pro 160ns.
Can someone please explain why Pro 400h is for sale again and no one's talking about it?
Dang i wish i could’ve met with you! I just went to garden of the gods today it was amazing
Jason, will you please include more slap boxing clips in future episodes? Maybe you could recreate all of Fight Club (1999) for us. Thank you
I took a shot for everytime jason said fuji pro400h. i have alcohol poisioning now
There’s gotta be somewhere you can still get it? Right?
Great video!
Where is Backster?
I found some new just last week in a store
No Baxter. Just got his long lost cousin, Buckster
Fun fact: Red Rock Canyon Open Space used to be a trash dump and quarry
I work at a camera shop and this dude brings in his old RB67 to try to sell to us. Come to find out he has a bag filled with tmax, tri-x and fuji pro 400H. Bought 19 rolls of 400H for $15 lolol
every time i watch any of your videos i immediately want to load my camera with film and take photos then forget that i live in north carolina and there isn't anything to take photos of, unless i want to take photos of lifted trucks
F in the chat for 400H
Fil,m development?
Nice error in 0:23
400h just discontinued by Fuji
I win
did you shoot it at 200 and got it developed at 400 or did you push it?
You were in Denver and you didn't visit me, how dare you... oh yeah we don't know each other and this probably seems really stalkery, fuck.
I see dead filmstocks
Last comment wins
Surely I win?
@@ejay6721 not anymore
@@WellzDigital how bout now
@@ejay6721 how about now now?
How about now
You have to use a roll for night photography, I did a series shooting neon signs at night/ dawn in old neighborhoods around Seattle. 400h was my choice film stock for this project because of the cooler rendition.
I did see a lot of green casting within the mid tones and shadows of shots that were illuminated by incandescent bulbs, but that was easily correctable in the scanning process.
I think it's a film that performs outstandingly well in very precise conditions, but that is slightly less good for general use (although I still always manage to make it look exactly how I want, it just often requires a little bit more editing work). I was visiting Marseille in the south of France this fall and Pro 400H worked amazingly well with the earthy and already quite warm tones of this very Mediterranean setting. The teal blue sky of Portra with the yellow accents on already pretty yellow buildings never really looked right for me and I ended up always trying to replicate the rather desaturated look of the Pro 400H rolls I shot at the same place. Though, for that very same reason, I would not recommend shooting Pro 400H in very colourful scenarios if you have other options. Earlier, I was shooting it in Lille in northern France and the results weren't quite as successful, notably due to the more vivid colour palet of the place (where Lomo 800 and Portra 400 were doing a great job). The other huge selling point for me was the price. While Portra is, I believe, a slightly better film, it is certainly not worth 1,5 times the price of Pro 400H. Here in Montreal, a roll of Pro 400H in 120 go for around 10CA$ while Portra is generally hovering more towards 16CA$ (though I know of a place that sells it for less than 14CA$!). Given my limited budget, I would go 7/10 times for Pro 400H. I find the lost of this film stock to be a tragedy because it robs me of my main source of cheap yet excellent 120 colour film that I can afford to shoot casually without being too bothered for wasting a frame or two (and I already shoot 645 for that same budget reason).
Edit : wording and spelling
Let me guess, Photo Service nearby Notre-Dame ? :)
That pre-stickied end of the roll sticker always makes me think of that famous Japanese attention to detail, just that extra little bit of thoughtfulness
Where is Ektachrome christmas?
And talking about Pro 400h being able to mitigate strange color casts under artificial light, Nick Carver said in a video (the one about the 80s where he shoots in an abandoned shopping center) that he really likes Pro 400h for shooting indoors
I think it’s important to state that the look of your film pictures is only half determined by the film you shoot. The other half if the display prep. That is, how you scan or print your negatives to be looked at as a final image. The only inherent look a color negative film can have, or maybe it’s better put by saying: the look a color negative film is being designed towards by the manufacturer, is for the developed neg to be printed onto photochemical paper in a darkroom or a lab. That is where the ASA ratings on the packaging stem from. Because the black point on a print doesn’t need to be so low, because the paper itself subtracts light. So the negative can be a bit less dense.
We love the Fuji Frontier scanners because they can by themselves be somewhat close to the look of Fuji‘s DP II paper.
There’re ways to calibrate them to look pretty much exactly like a print. And Negative Lab Pro also has ways to bring you pretty close to that look.
Everything else is variation and does not serve as a benchmark to judge a films look. Unless Jason would provide us with the exact scanning settings he used for those pictures, it’s save to say that the Portra 400 to Pro 400H comparison is not conclusive.
Baxter's appearences:
NONE
Happy Christmas to everyone.
Saludos amigos
:,(
that's not good
This is the worst christmas ever
Hey I’ve just got to say that these videos over the past 2 years have been one of the biggest uplifts of my life.
These past 2 years I’ve been working on the frontline of covid here in the UK like many others and lately I have been wearing thin and watching you’re videos helps encourage me to keep going out and doing the thing I love most when at times I just wish to lay in bed to hope the world will just move past to leave me behind so I can rest.
I really can’t count the amount of times I’ve watched you’re videos that make me laugh when I don’t feel like i have it in me, inspire me when I think I can’t and calm me with your amazing talent as a photographer calms the soul while also inspiring me to try be a greater photographer. Plus the bromance between you and Caleb is always absolutely brilliant the beautiful beast😂.
Hope you and to all that watch your inspiring videos have had an amazing Christmas and a happy new year
We all aspire to be like Dm_vin, he's a true family man
Last time I was this early, kodak hadn’t bumped their prices again 😪
Haha film prices go boom
It’s actually a 50 asa film and vin diesel sued to increase the speed thinking it was faster which made him furious.
I work at a photo lab and 400h in 120 is the best to load! The tape is so much better then Portra and it’s so much easier to open in the dark bag. It will be missed!
Can't believe you just glossed over 10:17 such an amazing photo
once i slapped a roll of kodak gold in my 67 instead of pro400H,
that ruined the beach photo shoot and the relationship between me and my girlfriend.
So the question is lightroom the shit out of the kodak gold to mimic fuji color, or just send to receipt to her everytime i buy another roll of 400H, is more healthy to my relationship, or my mental health
I really hope fuji eventually brings back Pro400H! I shot a couple rolls in Joshua Tree National Park on my channel and the images came out amazing! Your images in this one were sooo good dude
After the Kodak price increase it might actually be cheaper to buy 400h than portra 400
Thanks for another interesting video! I had similar experiences with Pro 400, the 35mm version. When I saw the results of my first attempt, shot at boxspeed, I asked myself if I am too stupid to shoot film or if this film might be a little overhyped. But when I tried it a second time, shot at ISO 200 it looked much more interesting and - as you’ve said - pretty similar to Portra 400 shot at ISO 200. Maybe Pro 400 renders colors a tiny bit cooler but all in all, both film stocks are quite similar. By the way, the photos you took on your little trip look really good👍.
ive done 2 rolls of 400h at box speed and i thought the same thing. ill def try it at iso 200 as soon as i can
@@felixnurscher6017 I would recommend to wait for a sunny day. If you are, like me, living in the northern hemisphere, those cloudy, grey and dark winter days are not very well suited for Pro 400. But if you wait for one of these rare clear, cold and sunny winter days this film stock might sing for you!
P.S. If you want to make these videos more authentic to your credo, get a video camera that shoots grainy film and digitize the results.
He'd go bankrupt pretty quick
As a film shooter primarily, what is your opinion on film simulations on modern digital cameras like Fuji? I personally like it but is it “cheating” in your eyes? Love the videos dude
Hearing Jason say “is that you my boy” really tickled my ear canal and sent a warmth into my body I wasn’t actually ready for
While Ilford does produce Acros II (and some other brand’s BW films like Rollei) its chemical formulation is still Fujifilm’s.
Pro 400H was really good under tungsten light. Definitely better than Portra 400 is.
Fuji Superia 400 ditched the fourth color layer in 2018 to be easier to produce. But it’s still the most versatile consumer film and actually the second best stills film in tungsten light after CineStill 800T. It can still produce a more natural representation of tungsten light than any of Kodak’s films. It’s also currently the best bang for the buck film now. At 400 you’ll get somewhat green shadows and a more muted image. It looks pretty natural at 320 and has a nice punch at 250. At 200 it really starts to pop. It’s really nice to have an alternative to the warm look of the Kodak films and that can produce some good looking magenta skin tones. Since Pro 400H is gone, Superia 400 is my go to if I want something different.
And just you know I have booth rolls of Natura 1600 and a significant other and I hold both of them close.
RIP Superia. It was because of this comment that I learned to love Superia by shooting it at 320 and below.
Now it's been replaced with Ultramax... Joining Fuji C200 as a film replaced by a Kodak offering.
Admittedly, I have seen some results and it seems to be slightly cooler than Ultramax. Why Fuji just can't offer up their formulation, I dunno. Maybe chemical/mechanical differences on the production lines?
@@LaskyLabs I think it’d just be too much work for Kodak at that price. Also why make a better film than their own for a competing brand? But it doesn’t seem to all dead just yet. At least in Japan production just seems paused. Also the new “Fujifilm” 400 isn’t quite the same as the current Ultramax, not like “Fujifilm” 200 is just Gold.
@@VariTimo I'm hearing that it's closer to Lomo 400, or an older variant of Ultramax. Admittedly I've seen that it is a little cooler. I need to try it myself before I can say for certain though.
@@LaskyLabs Yeah something like that is probably the case. The spec sheet looks a lot like an older version of Ultramax from before the 2007 update. But the reds are different.
@@VariTimo Fuji always had reds that popped on their consumer films. That was something I liked.
Oh thats one way to start a vid. wow. RIP pro400H. I think overexposing it, is the only way to shoot it. Havn't been a fan of many photos I have taken with 400h. Loalding ASMR video coming soon? Oh 200 iso, I will shoot my last two rolls at 200 after seeing these images. They do look better overall. I do hold my Natura 1600 really close nightly. Baxter has a nice rack. Great video per usual.
Kyle McDougall did one of his famous exposure latitude tests on Pro400h several years ago. Based on his results, he also determined that Pro400h looks best when exposed at ISO 200. Thus, I have only ever shot this film at ISO 200. And I will say that Pro400h in 35mm doesn't look nearly as nice as when shot in 120 format, even if both are shot +1 stop overexposed.
Please use it at night, it's amazing. I usually prefer it over cinestill, it renders colors way nicer in my opinion
Babe wake up new grainydays just dropped
There is money to be made still with film. Is there money to be made with Fuji Pro 400H, no. Is there money to be made with a pro grade 400 asa film stock, yes. Will Fuji let Kodak take the entire market creating a monopoly on prices for 400 speed film, probably not. I expect Fuji to Rerelease Pro 400H in a new format that is cheaper to manufacturer and perhaps with a simpler chemical composition. There is a high chance that Fuji may not bring out a replacement and there is an even higher chance that if a replacement is brought out that it won't be the same or some might say it will not be as good as Pro 400H.
Fujifilm exaggerating iso performance? Well, blow me sideways on the kitchen counter and colour me unsurprised.
So what you're saying is... Fuji Pro 400h is the perfect film for capturing those Christmas colors.
Pro 400H will be formulated into Instax....Instax Square.
There was some news that Pro 400h was being reproduced again, in 120
I am wondering, if there is much difference between a Fuji Pro 400H ICC profile applied to a digital camera and the analog original?
I think I have about 13 rolls left
You can still buy Fuji Pro 400h at B&H in the us or at Amazon Japan. It’s got a look and worth having a few rolls. I think it looks best with portraits
Yo Dude - too many shots focusing down at your "Package" . I'd bet that Monica would give her left arm if your's was as big as the lens on your Mamiya
This is my mom . . .
And this is my dad . .
And this . . .that's me . . .Hi I'm Jason . . .and my life . . .is kinda crazy.
It could just be me, but I get the feeling that if you just made videos about your going’s on without anything to do with film, you’d get a lot of views. Just a nicely narrated recount of the shit you’ve been up to.
4:48 this is just to inform you that I will be calling my Film photography channel ‚Amigos Colorados“
I haven’t finished the video but I hope you loved the penny arcade in manitou springs. Or “some mountain town”.
thanks for great video...I was able to snag the last run of Fuji 400H in Shibuya/Tokyo last week glad to hear that I was the last person to buy the last stock cant decide where to shoot it though.....
its still in my fridge...
its still in my fridge....
I have 1roll of this film. It came with my Holga 120N off eBay. It sits in my fridge.
I made a comment on Reddit the other day about the F3 having a Vasiliy slap and no one got the reference. The slap in the begging of this video triggered those terrible memories.
I love your videos. I’ve even shot some expensive ass film that came out shit but hey… live and learn. Kinda.
ok but the intro movie reference? (i’m not allowed say which movie… it’s a rule)
Can you fill us in on how your process of scanning 400H has changed. As you mentioned at the start years ago you had bad results and it could be lab dependent. Just interested in how you changed to get the right results
I've used it for long exposures at night and can confirm it slaps harder than you.
Did you pull it to 200 ISO, or just overexposed 1 stop?
and nobody has said anything about the impressive slapping match that happened. smh.
Bestie take this down everyone’s gonna buy up the remaining stock
I like using it at night , hate using it by day
Alright it’s keeping me up at night, what is the question mark for on the bottom right?
The panning photos you end the videos with are always awesome. Merry Christmas to you, Monica, and of course Baxter!
Man you make me laugh out loud every time... Love the video's man!
Yo, I live in CO Springs! There are a lot of cool older buildings, old cars and other relics of the later 20th century around here. I think it's a place that really fits your style. If you're ever back you should drive the 45min or so out to Victor/Cripple Creek for some true old mountain town stuff. Also of course Pikes Peak and Cheyenne Canyon are good opportunities
You have to try shoot it 1 under and push in development.
I have like 4 rolls of this and I kind of don't super care to shoot it for some reason
yes
Wait, if you had a latte in one hand and the mamiya in the other, how did you focus? 🤣
That yellow backpack has gone light brown 😛
I've got a couple of rolls of Fuji Super HG 100 that expired 29 years ago. Wish me luck.
Good luck! Your're going to need it!
wish this was another one hour travel vid! but this was great as usual!
There are some absolutely cracking shots in here 👌
can you review the olympus mju cameras?
Baxter's Pokemon evolution is not unlike Magikarp to Gyarados
How do you manage to make your shots worse every video?
I saw the thrift store, hope you got a $10 steal there 😉
This might be a stupid question but what’s the difference between this and Superia 400
Consumer vs professional. Also Pro 400h had an extra 4th cyan colour layer, Superia lacks it.