I think this is one of the most simplest demonstrations one could give Rupert thank you. It makes total sense on how a physical, yet non-material force could act on an otherwise random process- creating a sort of bias and influencing it's trajectory. Sharing this one with my friends :)
So how is a Galton board like this one random if the balls fall into the same sort of pattern every time? I guess I don't understand the implications of something like this.
@@Ihopeitsnottoobig Each ball has an equal random chance of going left or right. That is the fundamental unit of randomness, and equiprobable binary choice. A series of binary choices results in a distribution of outcomes, some more left and some more right, with an average of 50-50, but fewer as you move away from the center. The odds of ten coin flips coming up all heads is small, the odds of five of each is most likely. This distribution approaches the Gaussian normal distribution as the number of columns increases without limit. The end point of any single ball is random. The distribution over very many balls has a statistical pattern, as shown here. If you have a single pin, whether a ball ends on the left or right is random. Over many trials, you expect about half to be left and half to be right. That 50-50 division is the pattern.
@aeromodeller1 yeah okay that makes more sense, thank you. So the fact an invisible field can influence the formic distribution of information, lends support for a model where an apparent randomness at one level, can be formally distributed in a way where the pathway is influenced in a particular direction. This is what his morphogenetic field hypothesis seems to be about as well. An apparent biological randomness in protein manufacturing and genetic variation, is influenced by specific fields of informational propensity to distribute in a formic pattern within tolerances.
@@Ihopeitsnottoobig Life events are partly random and partly nonrandom. Sports handicapping is a good example of this. One year I found that the NFL playoffs were determined 77% by chance and 23% by nonchance. Some of a teams wins are due to skill, some due to chance. All of the losses are due to chance. The chance wins are equal to the number of chance losses, they are 50-50. The number of chance outcomes is twice the number of losses. The number of nonchance wins is equal to the number of events minus twice the number of losses. This gives a method of measuring the contribution of random chance and nonchance components.
Thank you for all your work! I found this about 6/7 years ago and have tried to implement MR in my life. I’m not captain of my cricket club and we talk about your work in the changing rooms. We have all experienced time slowing for a catch or feeling you have more time when you’re batting well. Have a blessed day ❤
This is an incredibly elegant demonstration of a concept that, I believe, has profound implications to other fields affecting many other otherwise, or so-called, random occurrences or trends.
Lexical (?) argument that came to mind when watching this: "it is material but not physical" could be phrased as "it is physical but not tangible. It is material" referring to the effect of morphogenetic fields. Anyway I believe I'm not as clever and/or smart as you are. Video liked, thank you for posting.
Since the forces exerted through magnetic fields has such an impact upon the formation of images, perhaps one of our most important tasks as humans is to become more and more aware of what influences by which we are being influenced.
Brilliant demonstration! It appears that the more we learn about the universe and its workings, the more we see the appearance of probability distributions, so it is great to see a theory that works that into its foundation. Thank you
A similar effect can be seen in quantum phenomena with the AB effect (Aharonov-Bohm effect) placing a magnetic field in the path of electron wave function (superposition). Leading to a phase shift (gauge fields) in the wave function, resulting in a distribution shift of the interference pattern. There is also the IBM Quantum mirage, in which electron wave function within an atomic scale stadium with a cobalt atom at one end, the wave function can form a mirage of the atom at the other end, only with real physical properties
Seems appropriate to mention here, that the Princeton PEAR Project (Engineering Anomalies Research), had just such a device at their lab. They called it the Random Mechanical Cascade. And during their test runs, operators could use their mental intention to bias the balls to shift left or right depending on their intentions. You can read about all the PEAR experiments in the various lab published books such as Margins of Reality.
Without magnets, a ball striking a pin has an equal chance of going either way. A series of such binary choices produces the Pascal (binomial) number distribution. Placing a magnetic field shifts the odds at several of the pins. You can see in the result that balls have been pulled toward the magnets and away from adjacent columns. Compare the two curves. What you have is some pins have been shifted from 50-50 to other odds, like 60-40 and some to 40-60. If you tilt the whole board sideways, you shift the odds equally on all pins and you will get a uniformly skewed distribution. All of the pins will have the same non 59-50 split. If there was some way you could distort the surface of the board to direct the balls to the side, you could make a similar effect. The generalization of this concept is that we could assign any odds to each pin and get any final distribution that we wanted (on the interval limited by the width of the base of the board).
It ends up with an empirical distribution which roughly follows a binomial distribution which in turn _approximates_ a normal distribution if n goes towards infinity.
James Tunney points out the Galton board as well and it's significance, his interviews are worth a respect. Exploring Pierre Teilhard de Chardin's "Omega Point" theory seems to agree to an extent on the formalities of the universe as far as the Galton board goes and your explanations. Although, I think Teilhard's view was a little upside down, "all things that rise must converge". I'd argue the convergence of reality is in the summation of novelty from a collection of points that derive from the penultimate point of origination. Teilhard's diagrams in the link. Thanks for what you do. ruclips.net/video/nrhBb9GXHZk/видео.html
Because that the distribution curve is not only found in things like human intelligence and in certain but also in physical distributions which can be changed by unseen forces like magnets. This the interconnection with nature and fields can clearly be seen and likely pervades everything.
Muppet here, many a grain of salt required. I don't think the normal distribution pattern has been appreaitably affected at all. Simply the point of equalibrium has been shifted, much akin to the presession of the equinox. Again factor in appropriate muppet quotient. Reminds me of being a kid and going to the fair putting your coins into the same machines. Gypsies ain't idiots 😂 although there's no accounting for the nudging the machine to get your pay day. You live by the sword, you die by the sword. Hip magnet, P T Barnham would be proud
I ponder if there are changes in randomness by WHO watches the effect? Also the emotion of a single person effects the movement. Thoughts have a effect on events of this realm.
Fun fact: Francis Galton coined the term "eugenics" in 1883, the same year August Weismann published his theory of the germline/Weismann barrier. Coincidence?
I had a dream that stars don't form from mass attracting mass, but are collections of material swirled together by pre-existing invisible frictionless eddies in a superfluid. How these eddies are formed might be the more interesting question?
However a magnetic field is not truly invisible, we can measure its force perfectly fine in constrast to morphic resonance which has no scientific basis.
“The Final Theory: Rethinking Our Scientific Legacy “, Mark McCutcheon for proper physics including the CAUSE of gravity, electricity, magnetism, light and well.... everything. So little to see here. Everything is physical.
@@pointzerotworeally? What pray tell is the phenomena propelling the meat sack to cross the i's and dot the t's? What made you make that reasonable remark. What reasoned that out. There is no experiment without a concious observer. You can say a mechanical detector dected the observation all you want, but it's irrelevant without a conciousness to conceive of and build the detector and look through the lense to witness the event. There's simply no way to get any result whatsoever without there being some seperation between cause and effect. Hickory dickory Dock mate
I'm pretty sure that this demo has more in common with adjusting the positions of the pegs, then it would with actual PSI effects. For me it doesn't help to visualize how PSI effects (via a field or anything else) could influence this process. Especially keeping in mind that the psychokinetic effects would occur in so many different kinds of systems. Those look like straight up probability shifts, while this is a direct force exerted on the metallic particles. Or I guess the field could be creating some distortions in space-time-whatever, on quantum level perhaps, that shift the probabilities of micro and macro events.. Shnol effect would be a very interesting thing to hear your opinion on! This demo really reminds me of it.
I am not really concerned about what any particular person BELIEVES. You may believe that there is an old man with a white beard perched in the clouds, that the Ultimate Reality is a young blackish-blue Indian guy, that the universe is eternal, that Mother Mary was a certifiable virgin, or that gross physical matter is the foundation of existence. The ONLY thing that really matters is your meta-ethics, not your meta-physics. Do you consider any form of non-monarchical government (such as democracy or socialism) to be beneficial? Do you unnecessarily destroy the lives of poor, innocent animals and gorge on their bloody carcasses? Do you believe homosexuality and transvestism are moral? Do you consider feminist ideology to be righteous? If so, then you are objectively immoral, and your so-called "enlightened/awakened" state is immaterial, since it does not benefit society in any way.
I think this is one of the most simplest demonstrations one could give Rupert thank you. It makes total sense on how a physical, yet non-material force could act on an otherwise random process- creating a sort of bias and influencing it's trajectory. Sharing this one with my friends :)
So how is a Galton board like this one random if the balls fall into the same sort of pattern every time? I guess I don't understand the implications of something like this.
@@Ihopeitsnottoobig Each ball has an equal random chance of going left or right. That is the fundamental unit of randomness, and equiprobable binary choice. A series of binary choices results in a distribution of outcomes, some more left and some more right, with an average of 50-50, but fewer as you move away from the center. The odds of ten coin flips coming up all heads is small, the odds of five of each is most likely. This distribution approaches the Gaussian normal distribution as the number of columns increases without limit.
The end point of any single ball is random. The distribution over very many balls has a statistical pattern, as shown here. If you have a single pin, whether a ball ends on the left or right is random. Over many trials, you expect about half to be left and half to be right. That 50-50 division is the pattern.
@aeromodeller1 yeah okay that makes more sense, thank you. So the fact an invisible field can influence the formic distribution of information, lends support for a model where an apparent randomness at one level, can be formally distributed in a way where the pathway is influenced in a particular direction. This is what his morphogenetic field hypothesis seems to be about as well. An apparent biological randomness in protein manufacturing and genetic variation, is influenced by specific fields of informational propensity to distribute in a formic pattern within tolerances.
@@Ihopeitsnottoobig Life events are partly random and partly nonrandom. Sports handicapping is a good example of this. One year I found that the NFL playoffs were determined 77% by chance and 23% by nonchance. Some of a teams wins are due to skill, some due to chance. All of the losses are due to chance. The chance wins are equal to the number of chance losses, they are 50-50. The number of chance outcomes is twice the number of losses. The number of nonchance wins is equal to the number of events minus twice the number of losses. This gives a method of measuring the contribution of random chance and nonchance components.
Thank you for all your work! I found this about 6/7 years ago and have tried to implement MR in my life.
I’m not captain of my cricket club and we talk about your work in the changing rooms. We have all experienced time slowing for a catch or feeling you have more time when you’re batting well.
Have a blessed day ❤
I love this comment.
Rupert thank you so much for this wonderful elegant demonstration. every video from you is like a letter from Newton, you are a treasure of our time.
This is an incredibly elegant demonstration of a concept that, I believe, has profound implications to other fields affecting many other otherwise, or so-called, random occurrences or trends.
That really gets the message across. Thought is a thing/force.
Sweet harmony, synergy. Harmonics. Frequency.
Lexical (?) argument that came to mind when watching this: "it is material but not physical" could be phrased as "it is physical but not tangible. It is material" referring to the effect of morphogenetic fields. Anyway I believe I'm not as clever and/or smart as you are. Video liked, thank you for posting.
Since the forces exerted through magnetic fields has such an impact upon the formation of images, perhaps one of our most important tasks as humans is to become more and more aware of what influences by which we are being influenced.
Brilliant demonstration! It appears that the more we learn about the universe and its workings, the more we see the appearance of probability distributions, so it is great to see a theory that works that into its foundation. Thank you
Very interesting. Thank you
In my humble opinion... Rupert 👍
Great demo
Fascinating and entertaining video, great food for thought; thank you for sharing.
Amazing!! Thank you. ❤️
A similar effect can be seen in quantum phenomena with the AB effect (Aharonov-Bohm effect) placing a magnetic field in the path of electron wave function (superposition). Leading to a phase shift (gauge fields) in the wave function, resulting in a distribution shift of the interference pattern.
There is also the IBM Quantum mirage, in which electron wave function within an atomic scale stadium with a cobalt atom at one end, the wave function can form a mirage of the atom at the other end, only with real physical properties
Seems appropriate to mention here, that the Princeton PEAR Project (Engineering Anomalies Research), had just such a device at their lab. They called it the Random Mechanical Cascade. And during their test runs, operators could use their mental intention to bias the balls to shift left or right depending on their intentions. You can read about all the PEAR experiments in the various lab published books such as Margins of Reality.
@Rupert Sheldrake
Without magnets, a ball striking a pin has an equal chance of going either way. A series of such binary choices produces the Pascal (binomial) number distribution. Placing a magnetic field shifts the odds at several of the pins. You can see in the result that balls have been pulled toward the magnets and away from adjacent columns. Compare the two curves. What you have is some pins have been shifted from 50-50 to other odds, like 60-40 and some to 40-60. If you tilt the whole board sideways, you shift the odds equally on all pins and you will get a uniformly skewed distribution. All of the pins will have the same non 59-50 split. If there was some way you could distort the surface of the board to direct the balls to the side, you could make a similar effect. The generalization of this concept is that we could assign any odds to each pin and get any final distribution that we wanted (on the interval limited by the width of the base of the board).
Um abraço de Portugal!❤🙏⚘️
It ends up with an empirical distribution which roughly follows a binomial distribution which in turn _approximates_ a normal distribution if n goes towards infinity.
James Tunney points out the Galton board as well and it's significance, his interviews are worth a respect. Exploring Pierre Teilhard de Chardin's "Omega Point" theory seems to agree to an extent on the formalities of the universe as far as the Galton board goes and your explanations. Although, I think Teilhard's view was a little upside down, "all things that rise must converge". I'd argue the convergence of reality is in the summation of novelty from a collection of points that derive from the penultimate point of origination. Teilhard's diagrams in the link. Thanks for what you do.
ruclips.net/video/nrhBb9GXHZk/видео.html
Amazing
Because?
Because that the distribution curve is not only found in things like human intelligence and in certain but also in physical distributions which can be changed by unseen forces like magnets. This the interconnection with nature and fields can clearly be seen and likely pervades everything.
Magnets are a known force though
Muppet here, many a grain of salt required. I don't think the normal distribution pattern has been appreaitably affected at all. Simply the point of equalibrium has been shifted, much akin to the presession of the equinox. Again factor in appropriate muppet quotient. Reminds me of being a kid and going to the fair putting your coins into the same machines. Gypsies ain't idiots 😂 although there's no accounting for the nudging the machine to get your pay day. You live by the sword, you die by the sword. Hip magnet, P T Barnham would be proud
I ponder if there are changes in randomness by WHO watches the effect? Also the emotion of a single person effects the movement. Thoughts have a effect on events of this realm.
In this instance and with these circumstances.
Fun fact: Francis Galton coined the term "eugenics" in 1883, the same year August Weismann published his theory of the germline/Weismann barrier. Coincidence?
I know what you're trying to demonstrate with this, but I really just want the desk toy there.
Rupert, i think you just demonstrated the method of the Great Tao.
I had a dream that stars don't form from mass attracting mass, but are collections of material swirled together by pre-existing invisible frictionless eddies in a superfluid. How these eddies are formed might be the more interesting question?
Dream revelation is still better than dark matter.
Superfluid, firmament. Yes you are going near
However a magnetic field is not truly invisible, we can measure its force perfectly fine in constrast to morphic resonance which has no scientific basis.
🙏✨🌀
“The Final Theory: Rethinking Our Scientific Legacy “, Mark McCutcheon for proper physics including the CAUSE of gravity, electricity, magnetism, light and well.... everything. So little to see here. Everything is physical.
The big question is if it was magnetism or consciousness that moved them ???
Bit of both I’d say
This question could be posed on all physics experiments, and none of them require consciousness to run.
What isn't consciousness? I know, that doesn't seem to answer much.
@@pointzerotworeally? What pray tell is the phenomena propelling the meat sack to cross the i's and dot the t's? What made you make that reasonable remark. What reasoned that out. There is no experiment without a concious observer. You can say a mechanical detector dected the observation all you want, but it's irrelevant without a conciousness to conceive of and build the detector and look through the lense to witness the event. There's simply no way to get any result whatsoever without there being some seperation between cause and effect. Hickory dickory Dock mate
@@Gkuljian nice question though!
I'm pretty sure that this demo has more in common with adjusting the positions of the pegs, then it would with actual PSI effects. For me it doesn't help to visualize how PSI effects (via a field or anything else) could influence this process. Especially keeping in mind that the psychokinetic effects would occur in so many different kinds of systems. Those look like straight up probability shifts, while this is a direct force exerted on the metallic particles. Or I guess the field could be creating some distortions in space-time-whatever, on quantum level perhaps, that shift the probabilities of micro and macro events..
Shnol effect would be a very interesting thing to hear your opinion on! This demo really reminds me of it.
Moore Jennifer Wilson Michael Wilson Susan
I am not really concerned about what any particular person BELIEVES. You may believe that there is an old man with a white beard perched in the clouds, that the Ultimate Reality is a young blackish-blue Indian guy, that the universe is eternal, that Mother Mary was a certifiable virgin, or that gross physical matter is the foundation of existence.
The ONLY thing that really matters is your meta-ethics, not your meta-physics.
Do you consider any form of non-monarchical government (such as democracy or socialism) to be beneficial?
Do you unnecessarily destroy the lives of poor, innocent animals and gorge on their bloody carcasses?
Do you believe homosexuality and transvestism are moral?
Do you consider feminist ideology to be righteous?
If so, then you are objectively immoral, and your so-called "enlightened/awakened" state is immaterial, since it does not benefit society in any way.
Lol
@@yannkitson116Kindly repeat that in ENGLISH, Miss.☝️
Incidentally, Slave, are you VEGAN? 🌱
I remember Jesus's words, "Judge not lest ye yourselves be judged" King James translation.