Very intriguing deck, rarely have I been so sceptic and curious of a commander at the same time. It obviously shouldn't work and yet somehow it feels it might could. I'd love to see gameplay of it on your other channel
I play this card in my 99 and to have this come out at turn 2 and do about 24-32dmg over 2 turn cycles is quite crazy, this card wraps games quite a bit and its hilarious
Was goong to build an Alesha deck but that was before I learned about Slicer. I instantly ordered him because I think he is so unique and fun and in my fav mono color even!
Like how it is a whole new strategy for cedh, and how it could find a niche in the meta. I play mostly casual and have a tahngarth first mate deck that I pull out sometimes at my LGS with lowered power combat focused meta. Have considered switching over to slicer or including him
Do you know the ruling on commander tax for Slicer? I believe he still has to follow the rules of commander tax because you're still casting him from the command zone, where as yuriko and derevi get around commander tax because they specifically say put onto the battlefield.
i am confused on the interaction of cards like "Sword of XYZ" as they make no reference to the OWNER of the permanent, and how can you be the "CONTROLLER" of a permanent that is under an opponents control? What ever happened to Karona, False God??
Cards like trinisphere have within the text swamp activation costs. I thought based off commander rules this deck being mono red you can’t use this card?
You get a token on your turn. If that tokens follows to the other players arround the table I don't know. I think it dose. But you don't get tokens during opponents turns. Only yours. But I don't know 100% how it would work.
14/10/2022Converting a permanent doesn’t affect any Auras or Equipment that are attached to it. Similarly, any counters on the permanent will remain on that permanent after it converts. Any continuous effects from a resolved spell or ability will continue to affect it. Any spells or abilities on the stack that target a permanent continue to do so after that permanent converts.
so to avoid confusion, auras will drop when it is only a vehicle and not a creature vehicle anymore (so when slicer is converted and it is not your turn)
Is the More Than Meets The Eye casting affected by commander tax? I'm asking because I know for Yuriko she can do her ninjustu as the same cost so I'm wondering if it's a similar deal here.
The slicer only swaps places in the upkeep step, and the tabernacle triggers get put on the stack at the start of upkeep. So 1) tabernacle triggers get put onto the stack (slicer is still on the other side of the board so the tabernacle will not trigger for it) 2) slicer trigger gets put onto the stack 3) slicer trigger resolves and he moves sides 4) tabernacle triggers resolve, however when the triggers were put onto the stack slicer wasn't controlled by the active player so his tabernacle trigger is not on the stack. So slicer will only die to tabernacle if you yourself don't pay for him, which is basically never going to happen.
@@Suavek69 why though? When you flip slicer, and he turns into a vehicle, his living metal says he's still a creature, and therefore still a valid target for the auras.
@@theabrandt6177 Living metal (As long as it’s your turn, this Vehicle is also a creature.) AS LONG AS IT'S YOUR TURN. On your opponent's turn he is no longer a creature
Any deck can win in cEDH under the correct circumstances. Much like Winota a card like Slicer isn't getting targeted with spot removal instantly because it doesn't oppose a immediate threat. Unlike Winota this deck folds to removal. Swords of plowshares single handidly destroys the decks entire gameplan. Much like Magda decks like this is >fine< until players catches up on its play patterns. After there its all downhill.
You should 100% remove the Winota before it triggers the first time. Typically the turn Winota comes down they’re getting 1-2 triggers. You gotta remove the Winota a couple times to stop the snowball
Slicer's ability is difficult to parse. As I read it, once you give him to a player, that player can simply refuse to pass him further to other opponents, then Slicer "converts" and remains under that player's control. This doesn't sound desirable at all.
Yeah, my boy finally got some well deserved credit. It is so much fun being part of the Slicer community.
Very intriguing deck, rarely have I been so sceptic and curious of a commander at the same time. It obviously shouldn't work and yet somehow it feels it might could. I'd love to see gameplay of it on your other channel
Tomorrow. Soon. The video have alredy been edited. It is awsome. You will love it. On the cEDH TV gameplay channel.
Can't wait to build splicer. Mono red ftw!!!!
I play this card in my 99 and to have this come out at turn 2 and do about 24-32dmg over 2 turn cycles is quite crazy, this card wraps games quite a bit and its hilarious
Watching the slicer game in the eminence gaming Silicon Valley top 16 was absolutely epic! Totally awesome deck! Please get Alana on the show.
I love this man’s passion for Slicer
Emil is a bit crazy for it :)
I love that this deck punishes hard people that don't run enough removal.
Was goong to build an Alesha deck but that was before I learned about Slicer. I instantly ordered him because I think he is so unique and fun and in my fav mono color even!
Gotta play Unfinity sticker cards to prevent the phantasmal image and multi slicer game problems!
Doesnt work. You can mutate it into a dinobot or a phoenix but thats 4 mana
Like how it is a whole new strategy for cedh, and how it could find a niche in the meta. I play mostly casual and have a tahngarth first mate deck that I pull out sometimes at my LGS with lowered power combat focused meta. Have considered switching over to slicer or including him
Slicer is cool commander, i built one amazing.
I love how this is on repeat of "this doesn't seem good" and "idk I win on turn 2 so 🤷"
Do you know the ruling on commander tax for Slicer? I believe he still has to follow the rules of commander tax because you're still casting him from the command zone, where as yuriko and derevi get around commander tax because they specifically say put onto the battlefield.
Yes you have to pay the tax on this special cost.
@@cedhtv thanks for the reply. Ppl in my lgs were not convinced with my explanation lol.
Reaver Cleaver, Jitte, Aggravated Assault are missing here i feel
jitte is in the deck.
i am confused on the interaction of cards like "Sword of XYZ" as they make no reference to the OWNER of the permanent, and how can you be the "CONTROLLER" of a permanent that is under an opponents control?
What ever happened to Karona, False God??
You are the controler of equipments. So you as the owner of an equipment get the value from it. Even tho it is on a creature you don't control.
I tried this deck in EDH, Everyone at my table had like spirits vampires and elf’s to chump block, not so good in EDH
Cards like trinisphere have within the text swamp activation costs. I thought based off commander rules this deck being mono red you can’t use this card?
trinisphere is colorless and doesn't have any color identity.
That is reminder text. Kinda like blind obedience
How does Slicer work if it's equipped with Helm of the host?
You get a token on your turn. If that tokens follows to the other players arround the table I don't know. I think it dose. But you don't get tokens during opponents turns. Only yours. But I don't know 100% how it would work.
14/10/2022Converting a permanent doesn’t affect any Auras or Equipment that are attached to it. Similarly, any counters on the permanent will remain on that permanent after it converts. Any continuous effects from a resolved spell or ability will continue to affect it. Any spells or abilities on the stack that target a permanent continue to do so after that permanent converts.
Aura will stay. I think you pointed out they would drop
a i see now you mean because it loses its type it drops (303.4c)
so to avoid confusion, auras will drop when it is only a vehicle and not a creature vehicle anymore (so when slicer is converted and it is not your turn)
I wonder why cedh people use moxfield instead of other sites. Specially in light mode...
Is the More Than Meets The Eye casting affected by commander tax? I'm asking because I know for Yuriko she can do her ninjustu as the same cost so I'm wondering if it's a similar deal here.
it is affected by commander tax. You still cast it. Yuriko is not casted she is using an ability to get in.
@@cedhtv ok thank you
i made this deck when it came out on a $200 budget and i meber played it again. it was TOO nasty for my playgroup, which plays anything but cedh
How does tabernacle work with slicer?
Is the cost being paid before you get splicer? otherwise its a pretty big nonbo?
You order the triggers as the controller.
The slicer only swaps places in the upkeep step, and the tabernacle triggers get put on the stack at the start of upkeep. So
1) tabernacle triggers get put onto the stack (slicer is still on the other side of the board so the tabernacle will not trigger for it)
2) slicer trigger gets put onto the stack
3) slicer trigger resolves and he moves sides
4) tabernacle triggers resolve, however when the triggers were put onto the stack slicer wasn't controlled by the active player so his tabernacle trigger is not on the stack.
So slicer will only die to tabernacle if you yourself don't pay for him, which is basically never going to happen.
@@haproongru tabernacle gives the ability to creatures so the pay triggers are controlled by the active player.
Doesn't living metal mean slicer is always a creature, so auras don't fall off?
only on your turn. If you are down to 1v1 and don't pass slicer around, the auras will fall off
@@Suavek69 why though? When you flip slicer, and he turns into a vehicle, his living metal says he's still a creature, and therefore still a valid target for the auras.
@@theabrandt6177 Living metal (As long as it’s your turn, this Vehicle is also a creature.)
AS LONG AS IT'S YOUR TURN. On your opponent's turn he is no longer a creature
So few mana rituals!
I mention him in your transformer review video / and now I'll mention flamewar
Any deck can win in cEDH under the correct circumstances. Much like Winota a card like Slicer isn't getting targeted with spot removal instantly because it doesn't oppose a immediate threat.
Unlike Winota this deck folds to removal. Swords of plowshares single handidly destroys the decks entire gameplan.
Much like Magda decks like this is >fine< until players catches up on its play patterns. After there its all downhill.
This is correct. It mostly avoids counter magic until you maybe recast roboguy.
You should 100% remove the Winota before it triggers the first time. Typically the turn Winota comes down they’re getting 1-2 triggers. You gotta remove the Winota a couple times to stop the snowball
Slicer's ability is difficult to parse. As I read it, once you give him to a player, that player can simply refuse to pass him further to other opponents, then Slicer "converts" and remains under that player's control. This doesn't sound desirable at all.
ah, got it. the control only lasts until end of turn so the owner can decide every time.
What does Slicer do???
I just listened to 20 minutes of analyisis without knowing what Slicer does 😞
So you had 20 mins to look him up and didn't? LOL sounds like a "you" problem
@@Sinistra359
It was a me problem.
Kinda tricky to look it up when you're listening to it podcast style while driving 👍
@@project_swift sorry mate, didn't know you were driving. But yeah maybe spending a minute to read what the card does probably wouldn't hurt.