Hms hasn't accepted? Wasn't it the Israeli ambassador who said at UN that they will not accept and move on with this offensive or am I getting this wrong?
Yup, very bad attempt at framing, and the moderator accepts everything what Blinken says at face value when even Israel's UN Ambassador exposed Blinken for his lies.
@user-uo9eq9fj1l yip, hypocrites also shout ceasefire while marching on neighbouring countries. When you see everyone making calls and decisions as purely in thier own national interest or alliance interest. Life is a lot simpler.
Like the last ceasefire, it's always the Palestinian terrorists that break ceasefires. As the WSJ report clearly showed, the Hamas terrorists want as many as possible casualties as they believe that will help their death cult.
Palestinians had a two-state solution 70 years ago, they started 5 wars because they weren't happy with it and now people get pissy at the US for not trying to force it into existence, which Hamas wouldn't even accept.
Still "winning" half a year later lol tell me what military objective you achieved so far have you saved the hostages no most are under ruble did you manage to suppress hamas ability to attack you no. So how are you winning.
@@007kingifrit They have killed more hostages in attempts to rescue them than they have rescued. Is that winning? I would postulate that attempting to rescue people and accidentally killing more than are rescued would be an obvious loss. But they do get billions of American tax payer dollars so they get to keep free healthcare and education for their religious citizens. So they do kind of win there.
I am not symphatizing hamas terrorist but why would hamas agree with this? Just release hostage in first phase and get bombarded from second phase? Nobody would agree that. What would hamas get from it? Nothing except to release the hostage.
Is this reporter’s job just to parrot what Blinken has said? Given the many times the US blocked ceasefire resolutions, maybe it would have been fair to quote someone from the Arab side? DW embarrassing journalism.
Why would Hamas ever accept the terms of the cease fire? they're ironically enjoy palestinians causulties. for them the more casualties - the bigger the pressure and the condemnation towoards Israel, and the possibility of sanctions.
The most funny thing is, however much deals are put on the table though they ain't of any benefit to the Palestinians, it's a good deal to the international community therefore the Palestinians got to take it ,that's ridiculous
Yes, as Israel is not committing to releasing all of the ~11,000 of illegally-detained hostages they have and are actively torturing every day (they call them prisoners although no one has ever been charged with a crime). There is a great NYT article on this from just the day before yesterday.
Hamas trying to make changes is JUST like arafat. He got almost everything he wanted, then demanded changes. He ended his days trapped in a house. Dont follow that playbook if you're truly interested in helping your Palestinian people. It didn't turn outwelll then and won't now.
Why hasn't Hamas accepted the peace deal? Maybe for the same reason as Israel rejects the offers? What about a permanent ceasefire and constructive ideas instead of permanent destruction?
@@MendeMaria-ej8bf look into cause and effect. Israel ended the occupation of gaza in 2005. What did Gazans do, developed Gaza? Build up economy? Strengthen civil society? No, they sent suicide bombers, voted Hamas into power and killed Israelis. OF COURSE Israel would close the border with gaza to protect its people
They already accepted the deal laid out to Hamas. It was up to Hamas terrorists to accept in return but that didn't happen because honoring a ceasefire defeats the purpose of being a terrorist.
Israel accepted the deal as it had been put out. Hamas refused to accept the deal because they wanted the war to continue so that more civilians would die so that I Israel could look bad. That's their plan. They don't want the war to stop.
Same is true for Hamas. They can also use the interim period to arm themselves and attack again if left on their own in Gaza.... U donot know anyone of them from inside
Okay. So you're against the ceasefire now, right? Just cross out the 'w' from your protest signs. "CEASEFIRE NO! CEASEFIRE NO!" If Israel says ceasefire, the new hotness is opposing a ceasefire, of course. 🤡
Usa tries to show good will to terrorist since trumps afghanistan deal(that he made no preparations for once however) and biden followed up on it trying not to break that promise. The backbone of the defender of the freeworld is gone and pro terrorist sentiment has never been higher in the west. Maybe not for isis but people are overal more positive towards the taliban hamas boko haram. Maybe they dont love them but they don't see then as the evil terrorist that they are no more and wants to deal with them as if they were a western or Russian army
"You took my water, demolished my house, made me unemployed, stole my farm, imprisoned my parents, killed my mother and brothers, and humiliated me every day. Then you blame me for defending myself!" - Noam Chomsky v. Israel
Please don’t quote Neon Chomsky. He has spread so many lies about the Yugoslav war. He constantly gives citations but he always lies about what the source says in order to push his narrative
Hamas negotiating because they want a permanent end to the war. Israel want to resume the fighting after some hostages released. Thats how i understood it. After all the death and destruction it is not unreasonable for hamas to want a permanent end to the war.
@@Diablodestroyer You're literally talking about collective punishment, which is illegal. And if you want to say that that's ok, well then what happened in 1939 is also ok. The world owes you nothing.
@@Diablodestroyer There are no hostages and no Hamas in the West Bank but 500 Palestinians dead since October 7th. Since October 7th the have destroyed 900 Palestinian buildings and evicted numerous Palestinians from their homes. The idea that if Hamas surrender will lead to peace is ignorant of the situation.
@@michaelotieno6524 oh? Are you providing evidence of the incompetence of the PLO? I do agree both Hamas and PLO are doing a horrible job. I mean just look at how much more prosperous Israel is compared with these two places with nothing better to do then commit more and more acts of terror
@@Diablodestroyer Stop trying to change the subject, i am simply pointing out that the surrender of hostages and Hamas will not led to the peace you are saying. The best example is the PLO which recognized Israel in 1988 and laid down it's arms. In return they go nothing they wanted i.e. an actual Palestinian state. What they have is very limited control of villages and more land been taken away by settlers. Further, the Israel army continues to kill Palestinians in the West Bank. Who in the right mind would invest in Palestine. The Israelis control the borders you can't enter or leave without their permission, you don't even have freedom of movement in the country. The Israeli collect all taxes due to the Palestinians and refuses to remit them and delay salaries to Palestinians. Like i said before stop been ignorant of the actual situations and reciting talking points you heard elsewhere.
This plan is only on the surface a permanent ceasefire, if you read it carefully it leaves room to resume the attacks and that room will definitely be used. That's why they haven't accepted, and it's more than understandable.
Keep in mind that after the 1967 war the UNSC passed Resolution 242 which stated that ".........withdrawal of Israel armed forces from the territories occupied in the recent conflict......." to this day Israel has argued that the resolution allows them to keep some of the lands because it says withdraw from "the territories" and not withdrawal from "ALL the territories" After the Oslo accords Israel argued that it was allowed to build settlements in the West Bank until the final status talks were concluded.
Phase two has all hostages returned, but it doesn’t say how many Palestinian hostages ("prisoners") of the 11,000 will be returned in total! They have all been illegally-detained, are held without any charges, and regularly tortured (see very recent NYT article). Also, where is the recognition of Palestine as a state, the full withdrawal of all settlers from Palestinian land, and the end to occupation??? Based on this proposal we're going back to what the world looked like on October 6th.
First: Agree to facilitate the creation of a viable Palestinian state. Second: Release thousands of Palestinians who are held in Israeli prisons without charge. Third: Arrest netanyahu.
Hamas has no incentive to stop the war . As we saw and heard from sinwar (hamas leader) himself, they see every Palestinian casualty as an advantage to their cause because they know the pressure will not be put on to them, a terrorist organization but on Israel. They are counting on the UNs continued assistance to Hamas’ cause and the world’s will to just end this “middle eastern” headache.. This way they can continue to torture, rape and kill as many hostages as they like and plan (as they repeatedly stated) the next Oct 7th massacres. If the UN and ivy league students do the job for them and they are never accountable for anything- why should they stop?
It is not public. The negotiations are private, but it seems like the sticking point is Hamas demanding a complete withdrawal of Israeli forces immediately
A coalition of Moderate Arab States should be the ones in charge whilst, israel handles the security situation of Gaza. Hamas should be a non actor as far as the future of Gaza is concerned.
@@jayfender4486 Immorral Diaper fools using planes, helicopters, tanks, drones etc Vs civilians population with no army Not hard to work out who's the culprit murdering civilians
IDF is the armed defence forces of a recognized nation. Hamas is an organization that relies on fear and religious manipulation to control their own people. Glad I could help.
USA is the biggest hypocrite in the globe!!! This recent deal is death warrant for Palestinian as well as Hamas!!! Why should they agree on it. There is not any permanent solutions!!!
Everybody agrees that Hamas was governing Gaza before the war. Therefore, Gaza had its own government, which was independent and not controlled by Israel. Then why is this called "occupation"?
@@lukebandolino882Under International law, Israel still is the occupying power as it controls the borders, the sea, and the sky above Gaza, the amount of calories going in, and so forth.
This news report on the peace plan is important and I want to pay attention, but the pen clicking is so distracting. It’s rude and disrespectful to both the host and the interviewee, and I can’t imagine that it’s intentional. Please consider muting your microphone or putting your pen away.
This analyst is so biased against Hamas. So ready to blame Hamas. From my understanding they want Israel to pull out of Gaza completely. How is that asking for too much?
@AmkertYan But they are not criticizing Hamas, are they? The West "criticizes" Israel but still sends weapon. I am talking about the contradiction here.
@AmkertYan Correction, People are supporting the Palestinian people, not Hamas. Hamas attack on the 7th and Israel's response has only made the world unavoidably aware of the atrocities Israel has subjected to the Palestinians for more then 70 years which is the root of all this violence. Israelis yelling this started on the 7th are not being viewed favorably because it's an insult to the intelligence of the listener and the world knows this didn't actually start on the 7th.
why HAMAS compelled proposal ceasefire that was made by America this guy is arguing HAMAS is unable to Handle the war situation then How HAMAS continuing the war against terror Israel
So you support 75 years of occupation, blockade, apartheid, land theft, detention of children without charge or access to parents brutality and daily humiliation of Palestinians? Nice
Because blinken is being rude and deliberately ACTING rude to use his rude Ness as the reason Hamas rejects cease fire cause the real reason they are rejecting the cease fire is cause Israel and USA and pum pums
How do this host decide that is was a NO GO? All proposal needs reference and changes that could benefit the party (any party). What is workable or not workable, nobody is informed? So guessing is not a professional responsible act.
Hms hasn't accepted? Wasn't it the Israeli ambassador who said at UN that they will not accept and move on with this offensive or am I getting this wrong?
Depends on which point in time you are referring to and on which terms, when eygpt Hamas and Qatar agreed on something which was never offered
@@yakovsokolinskyyakovsokoli5878 no Israel as never wanted the war to end, Hamas has with a written paper saying they are agreeing to a seize fire
@@ogundejisikiruNo they haven't. Are you getting your news from Hamas themselves?
@@ogundejisikiruceasefire
Imagine defending HMS? What a loser.
What a bias report 😂
Yup, very bad attempt at framing, and the moderator accepts everything what Blinken says at face value when even Israel's UN Ambassador exposed Blinken for his lies.
Blinken, DW and this DW guy all are gaslighting....
What exactly do you object to and what’s your evidence?
how many times have USA veto'ed peace plan in UN? and did netanyahu acccepted this peace plan? lol hypocrite
Hypocrite? Lol, you should stop following international geo- politics if you have a problem the hypocrites
@user-uo9eq9fj1l yip, hypocrites also shout ceasefire while marching on neighbouring countries. When you see everyone making calls and decisions as purely in thier own national interest or alliance interest. Life is a lot simpler.
Like the last ceasefire, it's always the Palestinian terrorists that break ceasefires. As the WSJ report clearly showed, the Hamas terrorists want as many as possible casualties as they believe that will help their death cult.
Palestinians had a two-state solution 70 years ago, they started 5 wars because they weren't happy with it and now people get pissy at the US for not trying to force it into existence, which Hamas wouldn't even accept.
Why hasn’t Israel accepted it in full?
because they are winning and winning gives better terms than this crappy deal
Still "winning" half a year later lol tell me what military objective you achieved so far have you saved the hostages no most are under ruble did you manage to suppress hamas ability to attack you no. So how are you winning.
Exactly that is the right question
@@007kingifritexactly what have they achieved apart from destruction and civilian deaths? Oh and the destruction of their own hostages?
@@007kingifrit They have killed more hostages in attempts to rescue them than they have rescued. Is that winning? I would postulate that attempting to rescue people and accidentally killing more than are rescued would be an obvious loss. But they do get billions of American tax payer dollars so they get to keep free healthcare and education for their religious citizens. So they do kind of win there.
I am not symphatizing hamas terrorist but why would hamas agree with this? Just release hostage in first phase and get bombarded from second phase? Nobody would agree that. What would hamas get from it? Nothing except to release the hostage.
It's called a proposal, thus it can be negotiated.
Because Netanyahu While there is a ceasefire, the operation in Gaza is still going on. What kind of ceasefire is that?
Is this reporter’s job just to parrot what Blinken has said? Given the many times the US blocked ceasefire resolutions, maybe it would have been fair to quote someone from the Arab side? DW embarrassing journalism.
Why would Hamas ever accept the terms of the cease fire? they're ironically enjoy palestinians causulties. for them the more casualties - the bigger the pressure and the condemnation towoards Israel, and the possibility of sanctions.
You're 💯 wrong
Spot on. This is their game and the collective West fell for it
The most funny thing is, however much deals are put on the table though they ain't of any benefit to the Palestinians, it's a good deal to the international community therefore the Palestinians got to take it ,that's ridiculous
@@umarayyash2664 do you think Sinwar’s strategy of human sacrifice for political gains is beneficial to Palestinians?
@@appletree6741 what is your source
Blinken was too naive to believe in the false will of Hamas.
Hamas will release SOME of the hostages?
Yes, as Israel is not committing to releasing all of the ~11,000 of illegally-detained hostages they have and are actively torturing every day (they call them prisoners although no one has ever been charged with a crime).
There is a great NYT article on this from just the day before yesterday.
the release of the hostages in phase 1 is limited to children/women/injured. in phase 2 the rest of the hostages would be released.
Hamas trying to make changes is JUST like arafat. He got almost everything he wanted, then demanded changes. He ended his days trapped in a house.
Dont follow that playbook if you're truly interested in helping your Palestinian people. It didn't turn outwelll then and won't now.
Why hasn't Hamas accepted the peace deal? Maybe for the same reason as Israel rejects the offers? What about a permanent ceasefire and constructive ideas instead of permanent destruction?
Hamas said yes to a permanent ceasefire.
@@JacintaPalerm Yes, and it's no surprise at all. ☺
Hamas always starts wars and once Israel strikes back wants a ceasefire. Fact is: there was a permanent ceasefire until 6 October 😊
@@appletree6741 As I learned, there were regular mowings of the lawn before October 7. Not to mention occupation, apartheid and all the checkpoints.
@@MendeMaria-ej8bf look into cause and effect. Israel ended the occupation of gaza in 2005. What did Gazans do, developed Gaza? Build up economy? Strengthen civil society? No, they sent suicide bombers, voted Hamas into power and killed Israelis. OF COURSE Israel would close the border with gaza to protect its people
Having Qatar as a dealmaker is like asking a snake to bite you.
Have Israel Accepted the cease fire yet?? No. Then why tk about only Hamas?
Because they were the ones who asked for ceasefire not Israel.
They already accepted the deal laid out to Hamas. It was up to Hamas terrorists to accept in return but that didn't happen because honoring a ceasefire defeats the purpose of being a terrorist.
Because hamas is a tick.
Trying to eat a bear.
The bear doesn't care about the tick.
Yes so true
. Right answer... Hamas is demanding ceasefire not Israel
Israel accepted the deal as it had been put out. Hamas refused to accept the deal because they wanted the war to continue so that more civilians would die so that I Israel could look bad. That's their plan. They don't want the war to stop.
If the Palestinian people are suffering so much and Hamas cared One would think they would jump at this offer
Because Isreal would not agree to a cease fire once the hostages are released…
Same is true for Hamas. They can also use the interim period to arm themselves and attack again if left on their own in Gaza.... U donot know anyone of them from inside
Exactly!!!
Okay. So you're against the ceasefire now, right? Just cross out the 'w' from your protest signs. "CEASEFIRE NO! CEASEFIRE NO!" If Israel says ceasefire, the new hotness is opposing a ceasefire, of course. 🤡
Thought USA never negotiated with terrorists 😅
They gave up on that a long time ago, latest sinceTrump's disastrous deal with the Taliban.
They shouldn’t, all these deals with Hamas are a mistake
Usa tries to show good will to terrorist since trumps afghanistan deal(that he made no preparations for once however) and biden followed up on it trying not to break that promise. The backbone of the defender of the freeworld is gone and pro terrorist sentiment has never been higher in the west. Maybe not for isis but people are overal more positive towards the taliban hamas boko haram. Maybe they dont love them but they don't see then as the evil terrorist that they are no more and wants to deal with them as if they were a western or Russian army
They stick to funding them.
US government is the biggest supporter of Terrorism.
No sane person should expect Hamas to sign its own death warrant in the name of an agreement.
No sane person would expect Israel to live next to Hamas tho
@@fleafinder2972no Palestine wants illegal occupation next to them
@@fleafinder2972 I would say the same about Palestinians. They should no longer have to deal with Israel. A free Gaza will prosper.
@@fleafinder2972 Do what you gotta do, daddy o.
@@richarddefortune1329 They did so much in the last 15 years. Gaza is the tunnelling capital of the world, billions well spent.
"You took my water, demolished my house, made me unemployed, stole my farm, imprisoned my parents, killed my mother and brothers, and humiliated me every day. Then you blame me for defending myself!" - Noam Chomsky v. Israel
They are terror!!!!
Please don’t quote Neon Chomsky. He has spread so many lies about the Yugoslav war. He constantly gives citations but he always lies about what the source says in order to push his narrative
@@Curt_Johnston The truth hurts. There is no lie than the Israeli narrative.
Hamas negotiating because they want a permanent end to the war. Israel want to resume the fighting after some hostages released. Thats how i understood it. After all the death and destruction it is not unreasonable for hamas to want a permanent end to the war.
Also not unreasonable for Hamas to release the hostages and surrender and there wont be death and destruction anymore
@@Diablodestroyer You're literally talking about collective punishment, which is illegal. And if you want to say that that's ok, well then what happened in 1939 is also ok. The world owes you nothing.
@@Diablodestroyer There are no hostages and no Hamas in the West Bank but 500 Palestinians dead since October 7th. Since October 7th the have destroyed 900 Palestinian buildings and evicted numerous Palestinians from their homes. The idea that if Hamas surrender will lead to peace is ignorant of the situation.
@@michaelotieno6524 oh? Are you providing evidence of the incompetence of the PLO? I do agree both Hamas and PLO are doing a horrible job. I mean just look at how much more prosperous Israel is compared with these two places with nothing better to do then commit more and more acts of terror
@@Diablodestroyer Stop trying to change the subject, i am simply pointing out that the surrender of hostages and Hamas will not led to the peace you are saying. The best example is the PLO which recognized Israel in 1988 and laid down it's arms. In return they go nothing they wanted i.e. an actual Palestinian state. What they have is very limited control of villages and more land been taken away by settlers. Further, the Israel army continues to kill Palestinians in the West Bank.
Who in the right mind would invest in Palestine. The Israelis control the borders you can't enter or leave without their permission, you don't even have freedom of movement in the country. The Israeli collect all taxes due to the Palestinians and refuses to remit them and delay salaries to Palestinians.
Like i said before stop been ignorant of the actual situations and reciting talking points you heard elsewhere.
Blinkens is a liar
This plan is only on the surface a permanent ceasefire, if you read it carefully it leaves room to resume the attacks and that room will definitely be used. That's why they haven't accepted, and it's more than understandable.
The resistance are better students of history than the occupation. No, they will not sell Manhattan for a handful of colorful beads.
Keep in mind that after the 1967 war the UNSC passed Resolution 242 which stated that
".........withdrawal of Israel armed forces from the territories occupied in the recent conflict......."
to this day Israel has argued that the resolution allows them to keep some of the lands because it says withdraw from "the territories" and not withdrawal from "ALL the territories"
After the Oslo accords Israel argued that it was allowed to build settlements in the West Bank until the final status talks were concluded.
Well hamas isn’t going to get an option to stay in power. That was never an option.
The proposal on the table is fine except there is no mention of the vision of final resolution by that I mean two state solution.
how many times have USA veto'ed peace plan in UN? and did ne tan yahu acccepted this peace plan? l o l hy po cri t e
His aides say he has. Biden says he has. Hamas has rejected it.
China and Russia have also vetoed.
If you don't know why comment such things? Israel has accepted this peace plan. US has vetoed others because they wouldn't lead to peace.
@@juancsmix Israel has not accepted the peace plan, they have said there will be no ceasefire until they remove Hamas from Gaza.
It's like questioning why Ukraine not yet accepting peace plan presented by Russia, if any 😂
From day 1, these negotiations should've been livestreamed - this was the biggest mistake, imo.
If the Blinken says "yes" by default take it as NO because the US has snake tongue. 🐍
Who will guarantee the full implémentation of the ceasefire proposal?
"the question is HOW BIG IS THE BUT"
Phase two has all hostages returned, but it doesn’t say how many Palestinian hostages ("prisoners") of the 11,000 will be returned in total! They have all been illegally-detained, are held without any charges, and regularly tortured (see very recent NYT article).
Also, where is the recognition of Palestine as a state, the full withdrawal of all settlers from Palestinian land, and the end to occupation???
Based on this proposal we're going back to what the world looked like on October 6th.
We are closer to nobody's left
What phase involves the removal of the hundreds of illegal settlements from the west bank?
Yes exactly
@AmkertYan yes and settlements were replaced with a suffocating blockade and effectively an occupation. Who wants that to continue
@AmkertYan freedom for Palestinian self determination nothing more. You just don’t get it
Whatever the deal....Netanyahu wouldn't leave his chair! Anything leading to this situation will NEVER happen! Please dont put the blame on Hamas!
Sinwar's life is only underground, it's not wise for him to decide for the living (himself is among the dead)
Blinken can never deliver peace he is too afraid of the truth and turned into a liar
Isreal has a confusing policy or diplomacy or unattainable military aims or goal
Do not negotiate with terrorists
Great so don’t negotiate with Israel.
@@rossbaker9721 Ross Baker who lives in the West, clown world comment
If a terrorist group, be careful with it for you don't want to destroy it completely.
First: Agree to facilitate the creation of a viable Palestinian state.
Second: Release thousands of Palestinians who are held in Israeli prisons without charge.
Third: Arrest netanyahu.
Hamas has no incentive to stop the war . As we saw and heard from sinwar (hamas leader) himself, they see every Palestinian casualty as an advantage to their cause because they know the pressure will not be put on to them, a terrorist organization but on Israel.
They are counting on the UNs continued assistance to Hamas’ cause and the world’s will to just end this “middle eastern” headache..
This way they can continue to torture, rape and kill as many hostages as they like and plan (as they repeatedly stated) the next Oct 7th massacres.
If the UN and ivy league students do the job for them and they are never accountable for anything- why should they stop?
If you want to steal, you have to deal.
According to Israel. Who can forget that Israel had proof that 12 members of UNRWA participated in the 10/07 attack?
Said by the occupiers supporter.
Bs
@@duoharahapjambi8381Gaza has not been “occupied” since 2006, almost 20 years!! And look what they have to show for it..
God bless and protect Israel.
God is no racist.
Not a word on the Israeli rejection of the deal but bigging up Hamas wanting ammendments. As impartial as ever DW news.
Sin + War should not be tolerated
What are these changes? What are the terms? Why isnt that public?
It is public. There is a list of Hamas changes to the US proposal. Just google it.
It is not public. The negotiations are private, but it seems like the sticking point is Hamas demanding a complete withdrawal of Israeli forces immediately
No ceasefire with terrorists
Hamas cannot be allowed back into the Gaza strip.
This guest talks a lot but says really nothing.
This is what to expect went you negotiate with terrorists
Zionsist 😂😂😂
Only the first phase is clear. After that everything is “negotiable”. As such there’s nothing new in this proposal
The good people of the world stand with Israel ❤❤❤
It is ridiculous that leaders in both sides did not want the war to stop.
A coalition of Moderate Arab States should be the ones in charge whilst, israel handles the security situation of Gaza. Hamas should be a non actor as far as the future of Gaza is concerned.
How can dead people accept a truce?
Are IDF not terrorist? Why only Hamas are terrorist?
Nope. IDF are not terrorists. Hamas is. Glad I could clear that up for you.
@@jayfender4486
Immorral Diaper fools using planes, helicopters, tanks, drones etc Vs civilians population with no army
Not hard to work out who's the culprit murdering civilians
Yep, more and more people agree with you
IDF is the armed defence forces of a recognized nation.
Hamas is an organization that relies on fear and religious manipulation to control their own people.
Glad I could help.
They are at the top list 😂
Quatar must not be the den of terrorists.
If so then what?
Hamas is never going to accept its dissolution- that’s why
No permanent ceasefire or 2 states for GOOD then no deal.
Israel is the obstacle to peace.
sin + war = pride month .........
how many times have USA veto'ed peace plan in UN? and did netanyahu acccepted this peace plan? lol
USA is the biggest hypocrite in the globe!!! This recent deal is death warrant for Palestinian as well as Hamas!!! Why should they agree on it. There is not any permanent solutions!!!
Israel is not accepting ceasefire
Why should they???
Israel must vacate occupied Palestinian land as per UN charter for long lasting peace.
Everybody agrees that Hamas was governing Gaza before the war. Therefore, Gaza had its own government, which was independent and not controlled by Israel. Then why is this called "occupation"?
@@lukebandolino882 Because Israel control everything that enters and leaves gaza
@@lukebandolino882Under International law, Israel still is the occupying power as it controls the borders, the sea, and the sky above Gaza, the amount of calories going in, and so forth.
*Hypocrisy is amazing 😍🤩 and the complicity is phenomenal and that's how the leadership in the West and it's media is all about!*
Why negotiate with terrorists
This news report on the peace plan is important and I want to pay attention, but the pen clicking is so distracting. It’s rude and disrespectful to both the host and the interviewee, and I can’t imagine that it’s intentional. Please consider muting your microphone or putting your pen away.
No dealings with terrorists
Who is terror??? You???
But wars and global instability props up the US dollar.
You do mean russia. They invaded ukraine, just like hamas attacked Israel. Why do trolls ALWAYS LIE so blatantly?
@@alexanderdantonio8999 Only the U.S. is allowed to lie.
Because it wants to remain in power in Gaza. Duh!
no to the anti-christ peace treaty
Let the cease fire not be in the favour of isreal,no hypocrise from America and it allies
Wrong analysis
We in the United States support Israel and we made sure the resolution is in Israel favor. What do you expect
The real question *[**3:03**]*
Hamas shouldn't negotiate with terriosts
This analyst is so biased against Hamas. So ready to blame Hamas. From my understanding they want Israel to pull out of Gaza completely. How is that asking for too much?
Did you dwell under a rock? Palestinians broke the permanent ceasefire on 7 Oct and committed atrocities, they don’t get to play victim now
Start a war then insisting on negotiating ceasefire....
Probably theyll repeat it again and again calling for ceasefire
Hamas will draw this out forever. What ever happened to never negotiations with terrorist? Israel is never leaving gaza. It is the entire point
Hamas have accepted….
it’s the same deal they accepted last month
Why is it so easy to criticize Hamas but not so easy to criticize Israel?
95% midia in U$ own by them
What you talking about? Everyone is criticising Israel including UN, ICC, EU
@@appletree6741 EU criticizing Israel? They keep sending them weapons though.
@AmkertYan But they are not criticizing Hamas, are they? The West "criticizes" Israel but still sends weapon. I am talking about the contradiction here.
@AmkertYan Correction, People are supporting the Palestinian people, not Hamas. Hamas attack on the 7th and Israel's response has only made the world unavoidably aware of the atrocities Israel has subjected to the Palestinians for more then 70 years which is the root of all this violence.
Israelis yelling this started on the 7th are not being viewed favorably because it's an insult to the intelligence of the listener and the world knows this didn't actually start on the 7th.
God protect Israel 🇮🇱.❤
Pure Hypocrisy of the USA 😂😂
Why not bring on some1 from the middle-east to talk about the region
How can they negotiate with terrorists ???😂😂😂😂 absurd.
Where is the difference between Hamas and Likud?
@@ansgarm.cordie9659 maybe diffirence is thay they dont burn babies and dont behead them?
@@karinaisakina409 Where do you get your information from?
@@ansgarm.cordie9659 not from where u get it for sure🤣
why HAMAS compelled proposal ceasefire that was made by America
this guy is arguing HAMAS is unable to Handle the war situation then How HAMAS continuing the war against terror Israel
No condition is asked and Israel hasn’t even contacted commented on the Americans proposal😗
It's Qatar that has introduced the changes not Hamas because Qatar makes major decisions In Hamas.
When 1.2K lives mean greater than 37k.
@AmkertYan Yes correct, thanks for that. Israel has hardly any value for Palestinian people.
Good question
Bald guy is talking 💩
03:03 how big is the B U T T
Civilised people in Ireland 🇮🇪 support Israel.
So you support 75 years of occupation, blockade, apartheid, land theft, detention of children without charge or access to parents brutality and daily humiliation of Palestinians? Nice
God the bias 🤮🤮
Don't occupy
Simple as that..
No more suckers on the bed!
US/israel trying hard to blame hamas. but its israel doesnt want to acept in the end
Because blinken is being rude and deliberately ACTING rude to use his rude Ness as the reason Hamas rejects cease fire cause the real reason they are rejecting the cease fire is cause Israel and USA and pum pums
How do this host decide that is was a NO GO? All proposal needs reference and changes that could benefit the party (any party).
What is workable or not workable, nobody is informed? So guessing is not a professional responsible act.
I think that us has a plan that if hamas accept na deal then wether Israel like it or not us will do it with or without out Israel approval I think so