Prove that 11x - 7 is even if and only if x is odd

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 8 ноя 2024

Комментарии • 22

  • @martinhawrylkiewicz2025
    @martinhawrylkiewicz2025 2 года назад +6

    Nice proof. You can also prove it directly the 2nd part which to me is much simpler I think. If 11x - 7 is even then 11x - 7 = 2n for some n in Z, but then 11x = 2n + 7 = 2(n + 3) + 1 for some integer n + 3 which means 11x is odd together with 11 being odd, means x is odd.

  • @fazex4185
    @fazex4185 2 года назад +4

    Nice introduction to proofs, thanks!

  • @TheMarik766
    @TheMarik766 2 года назад +20

    Problem is 11x-7 but title is x-7

  • @henryduran1636
    @henryduran1636 2 года назад +3

    Math sorcerer you are my idol. I want to be a mathematician like you. I want to be a math professor

  • @andrewzhang5345
    @andrewzhang5345 2 года назад +3

    It's easier just to do 11x-7 = 0 (mod 2) if and only if x=1 mod 2

    • @lukasjuhrich503
      @lukasjuhrich503 2 года назад

      Yes, that would work. However, note that the complexity of the proof doesn't completely vanish, it just moves to the statement that reduction mod 2 is a Ring homomorphism Z->Z/2Z, which is a prerequisite to your proof.

    • @lukasjuhrich503
      @lukasjuhrich503 2 года назад

      However, I do agree that this proof is much more elegant as we don't have to prove both implications separately.

    • @andrewzhang5345
      @andrewzhang5345 2 года назад

      @@lukasjuhrich503 You don't need ring theoretic language to parse this. One way is just to recall that mod n induces an equivalence relation, and that the obvious operations on them are well defined.
      Or more ad hoc, you can just note that 11x - 7 = (10x - 6)+ (x-1), which is even if and only if x-1, i.e. x odd; which is in essence, what fancy modular arithmetic does.

    • @lukasjuhrich503
      @lukasjuhrich503 2 года назад

      ​@@andrewzhang5345 „One way is just to recall that mod n induces an equivalence relation, and that the obvious operations on them are well defined.“
      This is the same as stating that reduction mod n is a ring homomorphism, you just spelled out the definition. You're not really “omitting ring theory” here, you're just omitting the ring theoretic vocabulary that's attached.

  • @marriamhaji7440
    @marriamhaji7440 11 месяцев назад

    This helped alot❤

  • @verypanda1801
    @verypanda1801 2 года назад +2

    Another great video! :)

  • @lolzhunter
    @lolzhunter 2 года назад

    this one is actually quite easy relatively speaking, even*odd = even and odd*odd is odd, even-odd is odd and odd-odd is even, using these 4 rules you can quickly show that the only way for the end result to be even is if x is odd
    for example if x was even then that would be 11*even, and 11 is odd so odd*even, and that by definition gets you an even number, you then minus 7 which is odd which means even-odd which is odd, which shows that when x is even, you always get odd
    when x is odd you have 11 (which is odd) times an odd number, so odd*odd which gets you odd, then you minus 7 which we know is odd and you get odd-odd which is always even, therefore when x is odd you get even
    EDIT:
    since this proof is so general this also inadvertently proves that this rule holds for any equation in the format of odd*x±odd, where ± is plus or minus since the rules for odd even minus are the same for plus, so (2n-1)*x±(2m-1), n and m being any number you want since the result will be odd, getting the original equation the values would be n=6 and m=4

  • @peter-ck8db
    @peter-ck8db 2 года назад +4

    Why did yt recommend me this at 5am???

  • @Primitive_Code
    @Primitive_Code 2 года назад +1

    Ahh I miss these types of proofs.

  • @seamanreal3862
    @seamanreal3862 2 года назад +1

    Show!

  • @darly5448
    @darly5448 2 года назад +2

    Why did I get recommended this? I strictly watch kawaii vtubers and leftist political content. Good shit though dude