Lamborghini Temerario - 4.0l V8 Biturbo and 10,000 RM - But Why?
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 4 окт 2024
- Let's take a closer look at the ne Lamborghini Temerario Drivetrain!
What do we know so far?
Why did Lamborghini decide for a high revving turbo charged engine?
How will it compare to the competition?
Let me know your thoughts in the comments below!
Lamborghini Revuelto (LB744) - Technical Analysis:
• Lamborghini Revuelto (...
Join this channel to get access to perks:
/ @bsport320
If you want to work in F1 Aero Design, check out my Career Accelerator Programme:
motorsportengi...
(Please mention you found it through my RUclips channel)
If you want to learn more about Aero Design in F1 check out my online course:
www.motorsportengineer.net/aero-design-in-f1
If you are interested in how to design complex F1 aero parts, check out this course:
www.udemy.com/...
Check out my eBay Shop for customized aero parts:
www.ebay.de/us...
Check out B_Sport merchandise and support the channel:
buchan-motorsp...
Twitter:
/ b_sport320
Instagram:
/ b_sport320
Pictures:
www.lamborghini.com
www.auto-motor-sport.de
www.audi-mediacenter.com
www.roadandtrack.com
www.carscoops.com
www.all-electronics.de
Fun fact: the Temerario engine is not Lamborghini's first V8 engine. They had used a 90 degree naturally aspirated V8 engine in the Urraco, Jalpa and Silhouette models from 1971 to 1988 and that engine was designed by Giampaolo Dallara, the founder of Dallara Motorsports.
Also I believe the sc63 le man car uses a v8
Yes, and there was also the Cizeta Moroder V16T, which used 2 put together Urraco V8 engines!😎👌
@@Meeska9i don’t know if a V8 is in the rule book in that series for a car of that type, so they might not be able to use a V12
@@epicon6 Aston Martin is going to enter the Valkyrie with a V12 and also some lmh and lmdh use a V8 like the sc63, M v8 hybrid, Cadillac and Porsche 963
Actually that's is under Audi engine for made improvements 😂
one interesting thing between lambo and bmw v10s are that despite s85 being very oversquare and lambo v10 being very undersquare, their torque and power curves are near identical
Now THAT is fun fact
How is it that the 5.0 gallardo made 60 more hp than the bmw ? Are the extra revs enough to make a difference.
@@SONO4B11Tabsolutely, revs are a flat power multiplier assuming perfectly linear torque
@@SONO4B11T to be more exact on that: Power equals ( torque * rpm ) / constant.
the constant depends on the measurement system used.
Its also fairly easy to explain why in more natural terms: during a single revolution at wide open throttle, the engine produces its torque once. If you manage to do two revolutions in the same time, you get the same torque twice within that time frame and can do more work.
Its not that simple on real engines, as higher rpm also means greater internal resistance on the engine due to higher loads on all bearings and more cylinder walls being traveled by the pistons as well as camshafts needing to be changed to optimize timing for the faster engine speed etc etc, which is where VTEC, VANOS, Freevalve etc come in.
Shockwave/pressure wave propagation is an insanely complicated topic that seems like black magic from the outside
@@SONO4B11T sorry i remembered wrong its not exactly the lambo v10, its the audi version. you can check auto catalogs torque curve for "2008 audi r8 5.2 v10" and compare its torque curve to the 5.0 bmw m5 s85 v10 you ll see the curves are near identical and their peak hp difference is only around 18hp 500hp vs 518hp.
Lambo is doing what Ferrari should've done with the SF90. IMO Ferrari's V8s have sounded bland and muffled since the 488, and the SF90 low key sounds like a vaccum cleaner. Love how Lambo haven't forgotten about the emotional aspect of their cars. I think the 296 looks/sounds great tho.
The Ferrari 488 was also probably the last good looking V8 Ferrari, every other V8 model after it looks overly aggressive like it's trying to out-Lamborghini Lamborghini. The 458 had a perfect balance of beauty and aggression, the 488 was all aggression but not overly so. A 488 with the 458 engine would be the dream.
Yeah. The 296 looks nice. But the SF90, 12 Cilindri (what a shit name) and the Purosangue are just try harding@@CyanRooper
Isn't the V8 Ferrari use basically the 458 engine but smaller and turbocharged? They were compromised compared to lambo who were working with a blank sheet
And how do you know that? Because it revs 1000rpm more? It might not sound good
@@Kmaaq Ferrari V8s don't rev to 9000 rpm. And in any case, it just gives you an option that it will sound great with an aftermarket exhaust atleast
So the 10k RPM is done to give the same sensations of an NA engine (especially with the flat torque curve)? If so, it goes to show Lamborghini design their cars around their selling points which is something Mercedes-AMG can learn from lol
Let's hear what it sounds like before coming to conclusions
Ferrari did not drop rpm for their turbos and was always praised for the NA feel.
@@chiefdenis I don't doubt it'll sound less charismatic than the V10, but points for trying. They could have given us a tuned version of the Urus V8 and they didn't. And kudos to them for that
@@ArneChristianRosenfeldt But Merc AMG didn't
@@GearzMonkey mercedes somehow knows how to get the sound out of their turbo engines and still make them respond like NA
I saw this test car on road near modena while on the NSX-CE 2024 meet. I revved my c30a and the Lamborghini driver revved back. :)
How did it sound?
@@spicynachodoritos Verry cool. :)
Super excited for the GT3! (hopefully there will be one)
I’d be surprised if they don’t build one. The Lambo is a super popular car in GT3 that is only getting used more now that the Audi is gone.
@@cademckee7276 I'm sad Audi quit. Maybe they can make a comeback with the new RS7 sedan or something. And I hope toyota/lexus will actually finish that GT3 concept soon. We need more manufacturers!
I think losing the iconic v10 is a shame. I dont think a twin turbo v8 will ever sound as good as the NA v10 does.
It's not like Lambos haven't had a V8 before.
If Lambo aren't going to build 72 degree V10s, then they should just drop the V10. Their current V10s don't really sound good.
It's a crying shame
@@sepg5084 you need your ears cleaned
Lambos biggest pull was the aftermarket modding scene because of how robust their v10's were.
@@sepg5084 Bro really said that
At this point I am only interested in whether it sounds good. Fast is now boring, everything is fast now, an M3 can run 9s with a tune and bolt ons, a 911 turbo can keep up with race cars from 20 years ago around a track. Being obsessed with fast we get crappy sounding twin turbo V6s, electric cars, twin turbo mercedes V8s that sound like muffled v8 vacuum cleaners. Supercars need to sound super again. I miss NA V12s and V10s.
Use speakers. It is all a computer game now. Can we construct a V10 which does not need an excess of silencers to become road legal? What about a 2 l cross plane V8 with straight pipes ? No turbo because power is from the battery anyway.
Umm that's why exactly lambo built revuelto and ferrari with 12 cilindri with n/a engine?
@@ArneChristianRosenfeldtThat's called a Hyundai Ioniq 5 N
I agree completely. I lost interest in cars after 2016 or so. Turbo automatic g a y ness
First world stupidity problems!
Just get a set of headphones and pipe in the sounds that you like and you can just drive a civic and be done with it! Comfortable, fast with no reliability problems and you can have all the crazy sounds you want!
I was waiting for your analysis. You could talk more about the repercussions of their engine layout. Talk more about the implications of the Hot-V, 10K RPM on a Bi-Turbo and why the turbos are above the engine. 🤔
Hot V/ cold V on a twin turbo is a packaging question. Cold V engines are wide, hot Vs are tall, cold V engines have the exhaust below the banks, while with a hot V its high and in the middle.
he talked about RPM, but I think he forgot to mention the sound. Ferrari V8s already scream, but this thing will rev 1000 rpm further, so it will scream even higher.
The dual turbos are simple, single turbo setups just lead to lag, because the turbine has too much inertia. dual turbos lead to less top end power, but more usable power throughout the rpm range and less time waiting for a massive turbo to spool up.
Dynamics wise I suspect that a cold V would lead to lower center of gravity, but at the same time it means you have less freedom with how you're designing the floor of the car because with suspension, frame and exhaust manifolds + turbos, its pretty cramped down there.
With a hot V, you get all of that out of the way because now, all you need is a fairly slim intake system that's much more flexible in its shape than the exhaust and can also be made from different materials - all of which means that below the banks, you are free to do whatever you want.
Hot Vee was introduced to straighten the air intake for cars where the engine is in the front. Porsche then used the hot vee in a mid engine because they feared that the battery (on the floor) would ignite.
10,000RPM give hope the car won't sound as bad as all the current low revving sport cars.
Why is V8 rumble on RUclips always low revving, like below 3000?
it's Lambo, they don't make bad sounding cars
@@ArneChristianRosenfeldt odd firing/cross plane crankshaft v8 engine, like most American muscle cars. Plus, with the twin-turbo they're putting in, the engine won't struggle to keep up to the highest rpm to gain maximum power, so that is why the engine sound so rumbly
@@happysnekk from their website: in harmony with the vibrations transmitted to the chassis by the flat-plane crankshaft
@@ArneChristianRosenfeldt Lamborghini? Yes, they actually use flatplane crankshaft. I was talking about the v8 that uses by American cars. As for Lamborghini, they won't make the rumbly sound like the cross plane did because like we know it, they used flatplane, and it'll probably sounded much more like, for example Ferrari 488 or F8, and most McLarens (except F1, Artura, and Solus GT).
Can you explain why V10 engine is rarely use in a production car? It seems like the V8 and the V12 that car company usually use for their high end sports car
4cyl and 6cyl heads more common as 5cyl is not naturally balanced?
V12s are what the company started with before adding v8s to their lineup. The v10 wasn't a Lamborghini engine. It's an audi engine.
@@berserkfuryyy6798 the first Lambo V10 was a prototype mamed P140 built under the Chrysler ownership.
Help from Lamborghini gets often mentioned in the history of the Viper, that has it bigger but it's a V10 nonetheless.
V10 are more difficult to balance, they went imposed in F1 for the same reason of non-slick tyres, to limitate performances.
@@il-ma.le.no, the F1 V10 was mandated when everyone already used them. Ferrari had a more powerful V12 for a bit, but Renaults V10 was more economical to run and more reliable. The Ferraris used significantly more fuel, which is why they eventually moved to the V10 because it was just the better option at the time.
V10s are more expensive to develop because you need to add balance to the crankshaft.
While a 90° V8 or a 60-75° V12 would be both smoother and simpler to design and to manufacture.
Great video. It would be cool to see a video on the new GM v8 when more details are announced.
Wow, i just assumed a performance advantage was always considered when designing a sporty engine....
I didnt know they had to work around the constraints of standardization.
They shouldnt
According to sport auto, the bore and stroke on Temerario V10 is 90 mm x 78.5 mm
cylinder pressure: 155 bar, compression: 9.5:1
engine weight: 230 kg
One of your best videos so far
10k rpm anything is awesome 👌
Im very happy to see that his is not the same vw group v8 that you see in all audis and porsches
this engine was probably derives from their SC63 LMDH car
This looks more like an sf90 rival that a 296 gbt and is similar in power that the revuelto and could be easily more powerfull, maybe this needs to be a more track foucsed car, and then create a proper 296/750s rival. Leave the revuelto to the 12cilindri
Revuelto will rival the SF90, after all it was developed using the SF90. 12Cilindri is an unfair comparison, totally different type of car.
Only 10,000 RM? Damn I did nahtzee how they could get it so cheap
LOL
LMAO
Will there be an Audi version of the Temerario though?
This channel is genius level
That's a lot of pistons going really fast!
VAG: 24m/s piston speed
BMW S54: hold my piston
Lamborghini produces two flagship lines based on either the V12 or V10. Although now it seems they are moving the secondary V10 line back down to V8.
Primary (V12) line: Miura, Countach, Diablo, Murcielago, Aventador, and the current Revuelto.
Secondary line: Urraco (V8), Silhouette (V8), Jalpa (V8), Gallardo (V10), Huracan (V10), and the upcoming Temerario (V8).
Most other cars they produce is more or less a variant based on these cars.
Slower piston speeds did not make M5 V10 any more reliable. It's reliability is infamously woe-ful and whole ownership experience is a horrible balance act of endless "preventative maintenence" of parts that should not be consumable elements in an engine.
A v8 with 10k redline is a big leap forward for Lambo. Glad to see them willing to jump out in front for a change.
If I were Lamborghini, I would take the V10 and tune it with turbo and 10.000RPM, instead of making a V8. But wait, we have to keep the fans waiting, so we launch the "lesser" engine first, then wow, "discover" that we can also make a more powerful, V10 version of the engine! That's smart marketing right there...
Kawasaki/Toyota know how to make this stuff. 11200 rpm./ only 5.00 liter / 780 hp.
As a long time lambo lover who has Italian blood the new car looks good to me.
Ich liebe den Lamborghini in erster Linie weil er mir wahnsinnig gut gefällt
Just a question… this future Lamborghini V8 4.0 high rev isn’t simply the half future Bugatti’s V16 8.0 high rev too? 🤔
Love the drivetrain hands-down awesome! hate the look of the car though. Looks as if they’re going backwards in time.
Thanks
Absolutely appalling what emissions regs are doing to cars
and that it should ever apply to low-volume models
@@SafffOneeedon’t manufactures pay a penalty per car? VW pays with a lot of ID.3 for a few Lambos.
@@SafffOneee i get sick of it because cars don't even contribute a noticable nagative impact to the environment, they're just purposely making it hard to make exciting cars for no reason.
@@chiefdeniscars don't do anything bad to the environment at all. It's all propaganda
the only thing i'm worried about is the turbo making it sound like a vaccum cleaner.
other than that, it's one hell of a stock engine.
Love the video man, but I’m from America and get lost when you’re talking about engine speed.
I thought the Lamborghini V10 was cooler.
You and everyone else
It's just an Audi engine
I think its awesome and I'm sure Lambo will do it justice with the noise it produces, but i can note that with many very high end tuner 4cyl 10k RPM is always one of the weirdest sounding RPMs, Toyota, Hondas namely that i have heard. Very different engine but assuming this is flat-plane and basically 2x inline 4s i still wonder how it will turn out as with some (not all but many) of those cars 9k sounds awesome, 11k sounds extreme, something odd about 10k engines some of the time although its usually a rare target since it has most the cost of the 11k engines with less results, just a bit less risk/higher (relative) longevity. These are all 7-8k engines with extreme high end parts, for racing not production, not bespoke production ones though.
Some of the oddness i likely mention is just that said engines are usually mostly using design changes and tech from 11k engines, so they naturally sound like they are shortshifting.
This "New" engine is a VW EA825. They are using this design because making the changes of a titanium rotating assembly, finger followers instead of roller rockers, and a modified intake system is much cheaper to develop. Lamborghini already has experience working with this engine in the Urus.
Now they can make the full size 10000rpm 6.0 v12 turbo
90° V12??
@@ArneChristianRosenfeldt Why not 😂. Same as the v8 just another half of one on the end
@@danielthompson3849 equal firing order. Ferrari deviated to 65° . Most extreme case. I would love to see two crossing exhaust manifolds welded to their mating plates. How often do you need to unbolt them? Hot exhaust goes over the valve covers and ignition coils to the turbos throning high on both sides.
The low cg of the battery could make this happen.
@@ArneChristianRosenfeldt hot v. And can do whatever you want with the manifolds
@@danielthompson3849 actually the manifold gets hot and you need to let it expand. Also straight pipes are best for scavenging.
Honestly, idk why Audi developed a 5.2L V10 instead of just using the V10 Porsche developed for the CGT
Have the New lambo another electric motors on the front axle in each front wheele like the revuelto or the ferrari sf90 ?
What makes you think they’re going to stop making V10’s…?
This is just the Huracan successor. I’m sure they have many more cars coming and we will get the V10 back and hopefully it will be TwinTurbo as well.
It S doesn’t make sense to turbo charge it to make the same power as the Revuelto in the cheaper model.
No red for turbos for torque if you are relying on hybrid.
Better to have N/A V8 (lighter and better sounding) pushing 550hp and the same hybrid set up as the Revuelto
they should sell a version of their racecar as a road car
What's bore X stroke of the new V8 engine then?
So is it the same 4.0 Audi engine that’s in the Lamborghini urus?
No, totally different motor.
Lamborghini: "Because 'fuck you!' That's why!"
So what is the piston speed now????
I'm just wondering why this engine needs twin turbos AND hybrid assistance, when it's going to be an extra 200kg heavier than the Huracan at least, and every reviewer stated how the Revuelto felt it's weight in the corners.
EMISSIONS ☠️☠️☠️
Lambo wanted to put their "roadlegal" new V8 into the SC63 but with advice of real race engineers at Ligier and Prema, they change their mind (because their V8 was simply to heavy and not efficient enough) and decided to ask Autotechnica to design a twin turbo V8 for the SC63. Here is the true story.
If this engine has the proper geometry for high rpm workloads modified it will break all Huracan records (assuming a company crazy enough to modify them)... That's why you see GTR eclipse 3000 HP and Lambo's V10 struggle past that despite the displacement advantage... their piston speeds hurts them (You can't engineer yourself out of a long stroke design).
First of all, no one complained of "loss of power", I don't know where you got that from. Secondly, you're making seem like that 5.0L V10 is similar to the 5.2L V10. They're not. They're completely different engines. The biggest difference being that the bore spacing is difference. The two engines have completely different blocks and heads. They have nothing I'm common other than the fact that both engines are a V10.
Honestly I would've preferred this engine to be N/A hybrid rather than turbo hybrid, since it would have less power than the V12 of the Revuelto without being compromised, and since twin turbo v8 hybrids are the same if not more powerful than N/A V12 hybrids, they tried to kept it below from the Revuelto to not canibalize its sales and status as the halo car of Lamborghini, but then why put two turbos and hybrid powertrain then, or remove the hybrid powertrain or remove the turbos, then you would have a baby Revuelto rather than a almost Revuelto-beating car.
I think the V8T 10K RPM will sound epic and the Hybrid system more power instant torque, Im in favor of this direction.
@@ssaini5028 I like it as well, but it would be better then without the turbos, make it N/A hybrid!
@@leomux2004 Yeah thats a good formula. Have you seen the C8 ZR1?
@@ssaini5028 Yes, but that car is more powerful than a Revuelto, and sure, this will create problems for Lamborghini, but I'm talking solely about Lamborghini, and in my opinion, a V8TT hybrid can overpower the N/A V12 hybrid, and considering the Temerario is the baby Lambo, it can't have room to be more powerful than it's bigger brother, so it needs less power, and how to do that without limiting the engine? Simple, get rid of the turbos and make it N/A, so basically is an Revuelto with 4 cylinders less, a true baby Lambo!
Why they can't came up with a new V10 + hybrid? These cars with limited amount of cylinders won't sell at all - see the recent C class AMG with 4 cylinders.
But that is the line I draw: 4 cylinders is VW Typ1 , Ford model T, Mercedes A-class. 5 or more is enthusiasts car like Porsche or BMW or even the first corvette.
Opel DTM V8 4.0 93x73
i cant believe lamborghini made a 4-liter v8 burrito
Very simple, economy of scale (..) since at Audi numbers rule (..)
Personally I'll take that 8.4L V-10 from the Viper and not sit in an even more powerful electromagnetic field than what my phone puts out. I can dream of a world where I can put Tom Ogles' carburetor system on a naturally aspirated V-12 and still get 100+ mpg. But, who knows, maybe Lambo has a real winner!
Why? Warum?
Weil Lamborghini den Imageverlust durch den Wechsel von V10 auf normalen V8 ausgleichen muss! Außerdem muss das Downsizing und die CO2 Ausstoßlimitierung mit Turboaufladung und mehr Drehzahl ausgeglichen werden, um auf dem Level der Konkurrent bleiben zu können!
Meiner Meinung nach haben sowohl 296 GTB (als moderner Ferrari Dino Nachfolger) als auch Temerario viel zu viel Leistung, als "kleine" Modelle! Ich finde, 500-600PS hätten immernoch gereicht! Übertriebene, idiotische Leistungsspirale nach oben heutzutage...
Die Leistungsspirale macht schon Sinn, weil die Autos immer schwerer werden. Der Messzyklus erfordert Elektromotoren um den Flottenverbrauch zu senken, und Elektro ist schwer, also braucht man Leistung, um das auszugleichen.
Vor allem braucht man dieses Gewicht auch, um die 0-100-Zeiten zu liefern, die von Sportwagen erwartet werden - Spoiler bringen da noch nichts, also muss mechanischer Grip her, und den gibt es nur durch Gewicht.
Die Leute erwarten auch immer mehr in ihren Autos an Komfort, was auch nicht gerade leicht ist, und die Leistung von 08/15-Autos steigt ja auch weiterhin - man bekommt am Ende niemanden zum Kauf, wenn der Sportwagen kaum mehr Leistung als ein Passat hat.
@@zibingotaeam3716 Bei Toyota / oder war's Yamaha (?) arbeiten die schon am Wasserstoffmotor! DAS wäre mal innovativ! Und das mit 10.000 U/min, und ohne den Elektromist! Lieber ohne und leichter!😉👍
@@einautofan6685 H2-Motoren sind so ein Blödsinn. Entweder man kühlt das Zeug auf flüssig runter, was unpraktisch ist, oder man hat es im Gaszustand, was auch unpraktisch ist - da kann man dann auch elektrisch fahren, was das Gewicht der Tanks angeht. BMW hat das vor Jahren schon in nem 7er gezeigt und es ist damals aus gutem Grund nicht in Serie gegangen. Alle paar Jahre kommt mal wieder jemand mit dem Konzept um die Ecke und merkt, macht immer noch keinen Sinn. Die Leistungsausbeute war auch nicht gerade berauschend - klar, chemisch ist da viel Energie drin, aber aus verschiedenen Gründen kommt da längst nicht so viel Leistung raus, wie aus normaler Benzin-Verbrennung. Deswegen hat BMW das auch nur im V12 versucht.
Sinnvoller wäre synthetisches Benzin/Diesel aus Luft, Wasser und Solarenergie in äquatorialen Gefilden, aber das scheitert an der politischen Stabilität solcher Länder.
@@zibingotaeam3716 Stimmt! Synthetisches Benzin gab es schon im 2.WK! Das wäre auch eine gute Alternative!👍
Jedenfalls möchte ich einen Verbrennermotor im Sportwagen haben!
Nur ein Verbrennermotor sorgt für das richtige Feeling und Sound in einem Sportwagen!👍
V10 war nur so eine Novelty-Gimmick. Wir sind jetzt einfach zurück bei dem bewährten ( siehe alte Lambos und Ferrari ) V8.
This engine will end up in an another Audi R8 replacement and might make it into a Porsche hype car.
Where is the V10 go ?
V8 is not a option for Lamborghini.
The iconic Lamborghini that I known is it legendary V12 engine
Because a V8 engine sounds better at 10,000rpm than a V10 does at 8,000rpm. There
i'm more worried about their design lately. It's going south. The SE looks horrible, and this Temerario doesn't seem to look any better.
Claims that piston speed is bad for reliability and is a hard limit. Shows many production cars with a wide spread of piston speeds passing this limit. No numbers about engine life. Some vague claim about lack of power, but no dyno run. Somehow palpatine returned -- aehm -- somehow engineers overcame the piston speed limit. Just funny how strokers reach higher velocity. Maybe the rule was for race engines with a short stroke?
The V6 either has really bad balance, or a weak crankshaft. V8 flat plane at least is balanced to first order. Just use long conrods. Long conrods help with RPM. I wonder if there are some laws about idle RPM. A racing V8 has no flywheel and needs high idle RPM. This would certainly violate some emission laws. In a hybrid you can just risk engine stall when you don't need much power. So, detect stall, stop fuel injection, open clutch.
Weight
Becuse this is the Lamborghini, and italian supercar, way. Wish they made a non hybrid na variant though this is gonna be too heavy.
#Lamborgheyni from now on please
Turbo and high revving doesn't spell reliable to me. But don't really care. Make it!
The power ratings are painfully close to the flagship. Revuelto seems like a bit of an underperformer.
Uhm, the original Gallardo had 500hp which was only 80hp less than the Murcielago. The same gap with the Gallardo LP560 and the Murcielago LP640
@@horvathr95 very insightful. Guess I am just a little underwhelmed by the Revuelto. That gap is now lower than 50hp, 789cv to 825cv. That's smaller than the gap between an e-gear and the LP-560. The torque figures are worse. I guess you'll correct me if I am wrong.
What could go wrong? Hope you don't use it for a commuter...LOL
Way to copy off AMGs M177/178 4.0L Biturbo Hot V8. . I wonder how they would compare
VW / Audi engine
What the hell is this? Lamborghini was always known for their' V10's and V12's, why are they putting a generic ass V8 in this thing that is supposedly going to replace either the Avantador or Huracan?
No one is asking for these turbo engines and small motors
Why?
Answer: Why not? 🤷🏻♂️
the Ferrari engine is dead the 812 was the last hurrah
FUCK !!!!! ARE YOU GOING TO OFFER ME LAMBORGHINI.
GRAND FRÈRE!!!
Because unser Audi engine 😅
I think V8 is the best sounding type of engine but it doesn't suit every brand. Lamborghini needs 10's and 12's. V8s are amazing in a Mustang. I wouldn't want a V12 Mustang. Wouldn't sound right
McLaren is famous for the F1 even though their whole lineup right now is a V8, so...
@@poly_g6068 true but McLaren has a history of being a company outsourcing it's components and driveline to build a car. Also the V8 they use now is very unlike a V8. It's sound is very subdued and underwhelming. I went to the cannonball run last year and although very fast they were the most disappointing car as far as sound. Didn't matter if it was a 720s or 570 or 675lt. I think only the Senna has any acceptable level of supercar sound
@@poly_g6068 I think the only European supercar that makes a right sounding V8 is Ferrari. Because they are very high strung sounding and raspy. The Lambo looks to be getting an Audi V8 and they tend to sound more like American deep thundering sounds
why? shit for “tax write off” for the rich.
Don't known abot the Temarario, but the Revuelto is a total disaster: much heavier than the 1year old SF90, way slower, 100k+ € more expensive and on top of that is ugly af. Why so much enfasis in carbon fiber if at the end you car will be as heavy as a SUV?
The v8 is built from scratch by the Germans, with the quality and reliability Made in Germany.
Lol there's nothing german in that car if not for non-functionable tablets
@@francescotrombetta8548 deniability is the root of stupidity
@@Ov3RFLoW88 not looking for proper infos is the root of stupidity, lamborghini headquarters are at Sant'Agata bolognese where all the parts of the car (engines, headlights, body etc.) get built and assembled.
Lambo using small components of other cars' brands isn't something unusual as they used to borrow side lights from Ford.
@@francescotrombetta8548 Lamborghini is 100% owned by Audi. The engine is built by the German. Thus Huracan shared the same platform with Audi R8, Urus shared the platform with Audi Q7, Bentley Bentayga and Porsche Cayenne. Deniability is the root of stupidity. You make me embarrassed with your shallow knowledge about automotive industry
VW trash
SNOOOOOR 🥱😴
Too much engine data on cars we didn't click for. Lamborghini is not measured in numbers.
Love the drivetrain hands-down awesome! hate the look of the car though. Looks as if they’re going backwards in time.