words apparently have no meaning to some apologetics. -Is god the author of morality? -No, purple elephants without rerun. -Is god the author of morality or is he not? -Neither, god is morality. -So god can not change morality? -No, it's in accordance to his nature. -Can god change his nature? -No -Ergo; God is not the author of morality (nor himself).
Im going to make a 4 hour long mix of christains being asked yes or no questions and answering anything other than YES or NO. Oh and I love how it tells me I spelled christains wrong; no caps for you; you do not deserve it.
It is. It basically means his "ultimate will". The total scheme/plan. Because of this will, he allows/permits everything that happens to happen and because it is according to his will, it is fair to say he "willed" everything good and bad to happen because it had to happen. It's all very annoying and seems to be another way for people to come to terms with bullshit.
Sovereign - hidden will vs moral will - revealed. How can these two wills not lead to a contradiction? Im perplexed.
David absolutely understands the question, he is trying very hard to pretend like he doesn't.
David thinks he is showing the Euthyphro Dilemma to be a false dichotomy but he is actually choosing one of the options.
words apparently have no meaning to some apologetics.
-Is god the author of morality?
-No, purple elephants without rerun.
-Is god the author of morality or is he not?
-Neither, god is morality.
-So god can not change morality?
-No, it's in accordance to his nature.
-Can god change his nature?
-No
-Ergo; God is not the author of morality (nor himself).
Some people... you just see they are THAT type of christian in their faces....
Damnit all I want a go.
37:00
Euthyphro dilemma
The word "atheist" was originally used to describe Christians.
Im going to make a 4 hour long mix of christains being asked yes or no questions and answering anything other than YES or NO. Oh and I love how it tells me I spelled christains wrong; no caps for you; you do not deserve it.
I really don´t know why people perceive presup apologetics as anything but even bigger nonsense than "normal" apologetics.
So much of apologetics just sounds like it's made up on the fly.
Is "sovereign will" even a thing?
It is. It basically means his "ultimate will". The total scheme/plan. Because of this will, he allows/permits everything that happens to happen and because it is according to his will, it is fair to say he "willed" everything good and bad to happen because it had to happen. It's all very annoying and seems to be another way for people to come to terms with bullshit.
Rom Any It's an extra layer of obfuscation to keep christians from questioning too far.
preachinshawn it's an americanism projected onto the bible.
How is god hating anything, including sin make him a perfect being?