The Biggest Numbers in the World Size Comparison

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 21 июл 2020
  • What's the largest number you can imagine? Trillions of trillions? If you're not a professional mathematician and not some cool physicist, the answer is probably approximate. And could we visualize this number? Nope, we're not going to write out all of those zeros on paper. I suggest having a look at a device that shows the total number of atoms in the universe. And even surpasses it. I agree, this doesn't sound very realistic. But such a mechanism does exist, and I managed to find it.
    #eldddir #eldddir_space #numbers #space

Комментарии • 6 тыс.

  • @aexzaea4741
    @aexzaea4741 3 года назад +10316

    "No matter How large a number is, It is still closer to 0 than to infinity"

    • @hassanalihusseini1717
      @hassanalihusseini1717 3 года назад +476

      Yes, exactly! Nearly all natural numbers are bigger. Anyway I find it more difficult to understand Graham's number, TREE(3) or others than infinity. Strange....

    • @hypercoder-gaming
      @hypercoder-gaming 3 года назад +153

      Not ending a quote annoys my SO MUCH

    • @josh-brawlstars2870
      @josh-brawlstars2870 3 года назад +48

      Aeronn Charles Camza no, 9 going on forever is the largest number therefore it’s closer to infinity

    • @DaGraveCrowder
      @DaGraveCrowder 3 года назад +268

      Remember that infinity isn't a number, just a symbol representing the theoretical idea of a never-ending set of something. It's possible that everything is finite, even time itself.

    • @maddygrabham136
      @maddygrabham136 3 года назад +10

      Hassan Ali Husseini same here

  • @danielbruin
    @danielbruin 3 года назад +5799

    Even if I could spin the first gear at the speed of light. It still won't even come close to turning the last gear. :)

    • @2mjz84
      @2mjz84 3 года назад +171

      It has to eventually :D

    • @chandlerstevens4498
      @chandlerstevens4498 3 года назад +643

      Turn the wheel from the other side

    • @saemstunes
      @saemstunes 3 года назад +114

      @@chandlerstevens4498 undermined reply

    • @poulomi__hari
      @poulomi__hari 3 года назад +34

      Omg thats really you?

    • @poulomi__hari
      @poulomi__hari 3 года назад +21

      Wow... what is the farthest you have been

  • @fgwp
    @fgwp Год назад +120

    A quintillion is pretty easy to imagine in the real-life scale.
    Imagine a small cube with an edge of one millimeter.
    Then imagine a cube with a one kilometer edge.
    There is one quintillion millimeter-cubes in a single kilometer-cube.

    • @robertmichel8456
      @robertmichel8456 Год назад +5

      Wouldn’t that be 1 million?

    • @thenonfurry
      @thenonfurry Год назад +3

      interesting

    • @Mcdonalds-Cheeseburger
      @Mcdonalds-Cheeseburger Год назад +19

      @@robertmichel8456 Cubic Metrics grow faster,

    • @solifa1
      @solifa1 Год назад +9

      @@robertmichel8456 That’s what I though until I found something. See, cubic meters grow 3 times as fast as regular meters.
      1 km = 10^6 mm
      1 squared km = 10^12 squared mm
      1 cubic km = 10^18 cubic mm
      Here, he is talking about cubic km and cubic mm, so the correct equation is the third one. Thank you for understanding.

    • @badpiggs
      @badpiggs 9 месяцев назад

      @@Mcdonalds-Cheeseburger nice comma instead of period. it makes total sense to swap them like we are doing,

  • @oscarponce1
    @oscarponce1 2 года назад +39

    "The biggest imaginable number is Graham's Number."
    *Laughs in Rayo's Number*

    • @wv6309
      @wv6309 2 года назад +4

      Chuckles in ♾+1

    • @dhruvchitroda
      @dhruvchitroda 2 года назад

      @@wv6309 laughs in ♾️

    • @guest12200
      @guest12200 Год назад +1

      **Laughs in 100 pigalipontivalogifaribodigrofidojigillion**
      (10∞)

    • @lean2260
      @lean2260 Год назад +3

      remember kids, infinity is not a number, it's a loop

    • @JotaroGamingg
      @JotaroGamingg Год назад

      laughs in omega to the power of omega to the power of omega to the power of omega

  • @thingsforpaul
    @thingsforpaul 3 года назад +1244

    Me, an intellectual: *infinity*
    Vsauce: **starts explaining why i’m wrong**

    • @aprogamer6857
      @aprogamer6857 3 года назад +4

      Lol

    • @notplatypustheperry9179
      @notplatypustheperry9179 3 года назад +24

      Hey! Vsauce, Michale here

    • @thingsforpaul
      @thingsforpaul 3 года назад +6

      Kian Saliany you are are right but it is a meme, yes omega is the biggest number, i know that, i’m not stupid like you’d like to think

    • @thingsforpaul
      @thingsforpaul 3 года назад

      Zack Max alif null is an example

    • @j.p.blanks4552
      @j.p.blanks4552 3 года назад

      You guys are such nerds^Googol

  • @erwinruff01
    @erwinruff01 3 года назад +5325

    Has he tried spinning the mechanism from the other side? Imagine how fast the first wheel would spin xD

    • @trunzlerclement3227
      @trunzlerclement3227 3 года назад +911

      So fast it will break space time and reality in it's entirety will vanish... Literally the destroyer of the universe

    • @trunzlerclement3227
      @trunzlerclement3227 3 года назад +211

      But I am pretty sure it is just unisense spin

    • @trunzlerclement3227
      @trunzlerclement3227 3 года назад +108

      @Sentience100 erwinruff meant to spin the last gear instead of the first. That's a good question 😊

    • @arturbeqiri3882
      @arturbeqiri3882 3 года назад +542

      It needs an unimaginable force

    • @thedefdefdef
      @thedefdefdef 3 года назад +89

      U need all the energy in a black hole to do this.

  • @Enddeous
    @Enddeous Год назад +221

    Fun fact about Googolplex: If you were to write it out, each and every zero, you would run out of space. Even if you had the superpower to write a zero on every atom in the observable universe, you would still run out of space, as googolplex has 10^100 zeroes, but there are only about 10^80 atoms in the entire observable universe.

    • @goldycolors6982
      @goldycolors6982 Год назад +8

      Wow

    • @skierx
      @skierx Год назад

      notice how it is only observable. what about the undiscovered ? the mass that gets sucked in by a black hole?

    • @Enddeous
      @Enddeous Год назад +1

      @@skierx Oh true

    • @maartenvandermeulen2643
      @maartenvandermeulen2643 Год назад +27

      You would need to write a 0 on every atom of 10^20 observable universes to write out googolplex.

    • @Lianotube
      @Lianotube Год назад

      shut up dude

  • @Mr_Mooseman
    @Mr_Mooseman Год назад +138

    I love how mathematicians are always competing to see who can think of the number with the most zeros

    • @silksonic3927
      @silksonic3927 10 месяцев назад +4

      agustin rayo already won i think

    • @43617
      @43617 10 месяцев назад

      I made a number eeeeion

    • @larryslemp9698
      @larryslemp9698 10 месяцев назад +1

      It's really so much more than 'that.'

    • @tom-lord
      @tom-lord 10 месяцев назад

      @@silksonic3927 Rayo's number is more of a thought experiment. Nobody has a clue how the number is actually constructed, let alone what any of its digits are.

    • @Loser_LBozo
      @Loser_LBozo 8 месяцев назад

      Search up Centillion

  • @ossifyn3221
    @ossifyn3221 3 года назад +811

    The thumbnail is horrifyingly out of scale

    • @sonnyswint3034
      @sonnyswint3034 3 года назад +15

      The one and only ikr

    • @elvingabrillo8487
      @elvingabrillo8487 3 года назад +40

      last one is mrbeast's money

    • @darian2975
      @darian2975 3 года назад +98

      Yeah graham's number isn't that 'small'

    • @TerryZhuang
      @TerryZhuang 3 года назад +35

      Yeah, u can only fit 10 to the power of 184 plank size object in the whole universe and a Graham’s number is way bigger than a googol

    • @Tadcoco
      @Tadcoco 3 года назад +14

      saranqxv googol is 10 to the 100th and but Graham’s number is so much big that difference doesn’t even matter at its scale

  • @helenareedus
    @helenareedus 3 года назад +637

    Biggest numbers in the world:
    My student loan: am I a joke to you?

    • @golbox4
      @golbox4 3 года назад +4

      My knowledge:am i a Joke to you both?

    • @SpaceIsAwesome0358
      @SpaceIsAwesome0358 3 года назад +2

      @@golbox4
      yes

    • @golbox4
      @golbox4 3 года назад +1

      @@SpaceIsAwesome0358 then your wrong
      Idk If this was a Joke but i laughed

    • @SpaceIsAwesome0358
      @SpaceIsAwesome0358 3 года назад

      @@golbox4
      the comment is indeed a joke

    • @Ho_Tuyen
      @Ho_Tuyen 3 года назад

      @@golbox4 me who knows there are secert numbers bigger than infinity:my knowledge is beyond infinity.

  • @Jaspal05
    @Jaspal05 Год назад +11

    Robots in 10,000 years: counting every atom in the universe

  • @Farzriyaz
    @Farzriyaz 2 года назад +18

    According to my calculations, even 1 googol quectometers minus the speed of light is still a positive number, which means rotating the 100th gear on the mechanism is faster than the speed of light.

  • @velpex6695
    @velpex6695 3 года назад +215

    Was expecting him to start with “This is Arnold”

    • @johngeronimo8821
      @johngeronimo8821 3 года назад +1

      Same hahaa

    • @zaidalvi8774
      @zaidalvi8774 3 года назад

      Me too Vrlplex

    • @chibi_okami
      @chibi_okami 3 года назад +2

      Wait- Are they the same narator?

    • @saabyrth
      @saabyrth 3 года назад

      @@chibi_okami look at the subscription

    • @saabyrth
      @saabyrth 3 года назад

      @@chibi_okami but if it wasnt there its on the description

  • @harrypotalonzo
    @harrypotalonzo 3 года назад +699

    Skips the number "Sextillion" , Cause- yes.

    • @Fantastinobel
      @Fantastinobel 3 года назад +7

      ölölöööl

    • @bhaistang4627
      @bhaistang4627 3 года назад +36

      Oh uhhhh... XD yeah cuz it has the word sex in it

    • @nibsin
      @nibsin 3 года назад +16

      He's such a noob

    • @nibsin
      @nibsin 3 года назад +5

      @@shanghim680 I'm sorry what

    • @shanghim680
      @shanghim680 3 года назад +5

      @@nibsin noob

  • @SogehtMathe
    @SogehtMathe 11 месяцев назад

    Great video with a great visualisation!

  • @jefersonfaria7862
    @jefersonfaria7862 2 года назад

    Absolutely fantastic. An amazing visual companion

  • @ShynohEclipse
    @ShynohEclipse 3 года назад +626

    You can only put a comma if you have 3 digits coming after it. The fact that you end with one zero irritates me.

    • @theix1622
      @theix1622 3 года назад +15

      Comment until it reaches to a googol

    • @clickmaestro595
      @clickmaestro595 3 года назад +44

      Extreme Demon Kill him

    • @ash_the_guy2007
      @ash_the_guy2007 3 года назад

      @@clickmaestro595 o.o

    • @imkriss8301
      @imkriss8301 3 года назад +3

      Id do this, 100.000.000.000,00

    • @alvargd6771
      @alvargd6771 3 года назад +2

      @Extreme Demon make him do that many attempts on ya
      Also my friend says miliseconds ans hundrenths of seconds are the same lol

  • @MrSkeelton
    @MrSkeelton 3 года назад +646

    I'm irritated that he doesn't describe the largest number.

    • @josh-brawlstars2870
      @josh-brawlstars2870 3 года назад +39

      Zahay Bone the largest number is 9 going on forever

    • @mercer9534
      @mercer9534 3 года назад +3

      ruclips.net/video/e0xJwdcpATM/видео.html

    • @SamiDoustdar
      @SamiDoustdar 3 года назад +35

      Graham’s number isn’t the largest number, the largest number with a non Semantic explanation is rayos number

    • @diegodelacruz1372
      @diegodelacruz1372 3 года назад +14

      Number is infinite. There are no exact highest number ever

    • @josh-brawlstars2870
      @josh-brawlstars2870 3 года назад +16

      Sean Arcade Dela cruz yes there is, the largest one digit number is 9, numbers larger than 9 are made up of other one digit numbers, 247 for example there’s a 2 a 4 and a 7. So if you use 9 and say 9 goes on forever, this would be the largest number, since 9 is the largest one digit number.

  • @andy-ty5ph
    @andy-ty5ph 2 года назад +2

    Who needs to go to college and rack up student loans when you have wonderful videos like this to educate and enlighten! Love it!!!

  • @RhiannonDQ
    @RhiannonDQ 3 года назад +859

    So you’re telling me there are more possible game states in chess than there is atoms in the known universe

  • @ryansatoshi7932
    @ryansatoshi7932 3 года назад +245

    Riddle: Gogol
    Me as an Intellectual: Ten Duotrigintillion

    • @TheBestOfSweden
      @TheBestOfSweden 3 года назад +15

      Me: One quintredecillion times a octononagintanongentillion

    • @wfow1448
      @wfow1448 3 года назад +5

      I thought a Googol was Ten Duotrigintillion?

    • @ryansatoshi7932
      @ryansatoshi7932 3 года назад +4

      @@wfow1448 sorry my mistake

    • @wfow1448
      @wfow1448 3 года назад +1

      @Ballyliffin Bros Not that I'm aware.

    • @theix1622
      @theix1622 3 года назад +1

      Uhhhhh how about a Beyond infinity googolplex Numwes X 999999999
      It's beyond infinity its googol times bigger than infinity but its not the biggest number, a creator's number is bigger it would be almost infinite amount of seconds for you to write it all in one book but of course its inpossible because our sun will be a red giant and kill us all before that.

  • @willbagthegreat
    @willbagthegreat Год назад +7

    As a cuber I was waiting for you to mention the 43 quintillion scrambles on the Rubik's Cube

  • @bluewolffps1410
    @bluewolffps1410 Год назад +1

    That really got me with that thumb nail 😂😂

  • @johannesvanderhorst9778
    @johannesvanderhorst9778 3 года назад +590

    Unfortunately, this video doesn't explain what Graham's Number is. Fortunately, I can try. I start with some simple calculations most people should understand.
    3+3 = 6
    3*3 = 3+(3+3) = 9
    3^3 = 3*(3*3) = 27
    Now it becomes more complicated. The pattern above can be continued, but instead of the power notation one could also notate these numbers with upward arrows, but I will notate it with just "|".
    3|3 = 3^3 = 3*(3*3) = 27
    3||3 = 3|(3|3) = 3^3^3 = 7,625,597,484,987. Here this number can be expressed as a "tower" of three exponentials.
    3|||3 = 3||(3||3) = 3^3^...^3, a tower of 3||3 exponentials, on which the first calculation has to be done at the top of the tower.
    3||||3 = 3|||(3|||3), a number so gigantic it will just be expressed as "G1".
    To reach Graham's number this way it will still take a while. So I will skip some steps, but note that each time, we still keep the formula 3|||... (n 'arrows') ...|||3 = 3|||... (n-1 'arrows') ...|||(3|||... (n-1 'arrows') ...|||3). Until now we have yet reached n = 4 this way.
    3|||... (4 'arrows') ...|||3 = G1
    3|||... (G1 'arrows') ...|||3 = G2
    3|||... (G2 'arrows') ...|||3 = G3
    ...
    3|||... (G63 'arrows') ...|||3 = G64 = Graham's number

    • @Tafkadasoh78
      @Tafkadasoh78 3 года назад +53

      Very compact explanation! :)

    • @HollUpWhat
      @HollUpWhat 3 года назад +18

      Your genius

    • @insanegamer3696
      @insanegamer3696 3 года назад +45

      Ctrl + c ctrl + v
      Easy!

    • @ooreho
      @ooreho 3 года назад +74

      i don’t know what you said but it’s amazing

    • @tristandhin227
      @tristandhin227 3 года назад +9

      Well explained!

  • @denrick6283
    @denrick6283 3 года назад +649

    “No one can count upto billion”
    Senku: Am i joke to you?

    • @ohhimarx1471
      @ohhimarx1471 3 года назад +42

      Dude really counted to over 96 billion seconds

    • @terminusfinity009
      @terminusfinity009 3 года назад +8

      @@ohhimarx1471 count to 10³⁰³ (that's a centillion bty)

    • @raineanthonyvillafuerte1291
      @raineanthonyvillafuerte1291 3 года назад +7

      He had 3000 years no one can live that long

    • @BRAVETOASTA
      @BRAVETOASTA 3 года назад

      Conziltillion

    • @BRAVETOASTA
      @BRAVETOASTA 3 года назад

      @@raineanthonyvillafuerte1291 1 billion seconds is 30+ years dumbhead

  • @mistermiss9093
    @mistermiss9093 2 года назад +2

    "think of the biggest number you know"
    me: nondecilion,
    the dude: probably trillions of trillions
    me: smiles in what i learned from *cookie clicker*

  • @sawdogandjoe4837
    @sawdogandjoe4837 10 месяцев назад +1

    Bro explained an entire science and/or a math class in 10 minutes

  • @hereLiesThisTroper
    @hereLiesThisTroper 3 года назад +46

    Chuck Norris counted to infinity, TWICE!

    • @shurik3nz346
      @shurik3nz346 3 года назад

      Pfft I did it thrice

    • @poodle5421
      @poodle5421 3 года назад

      @@shurik3nz346 chuck norris?

    • @sebyg0466
      @sebyg0466 3 года назад

      Lmao

    • @TheAgamemnon911
      @TheAgamemnon911 3 года назад +3

      And he did it backwards the second time.

    • @stromboli183
      @stromboli183 3 года назад

      @@TheAgamemnon911 lol I love that 😄

  • @JTS1576
    @JTS1576 3 года назад +72

    4:44
    That zero placement disappoints me for some reason.

    • @mrafabrizi
      @mrafabrizi 2 года назад +1

      It’s because a googol is 10^100. 100 isn’t a multiple of 3, so a googol comes out to 10 duotrigintillion.

    • @JTS1576
      @JTS1576 2 года назад +7

      @@mrafabrizi I know that, it’s just that it’s positioned like this: 1,000,0
      And not like this: 10,000

    • @philjones5519
      @philjones5519 2 года назад +1

      It's cause it's wrong the commas go after every 3 numbers from the beginning of the number (at the very right side)

    • @Mcdonalds-Cheeseburger
      @Mcdonalds-Cheeseburger 2 года назад +1

      @@JTS1576 Well,
      Your a Perfectionist

    • @rankoss3437
      @rankoss3437 2 года назад

      @@mrafabrizi a googol is far bigger than a duotrigintillion

  • @kysroul
    @kysroul Год назад +13

    I like how he skipped 10^21 😂

  • @Nikolagolunska
    @Nikolagolunska Год назад +1

    The numbers are created in latin, with some additions to it.
    Like Unus, Duo, Tres, quattuor, quinque. Which are
    Undecillion, Duo decillion, Tredecillion, Quatturodecillion, Quindecillion (or something like that)
    The "Decillion" also comes from latin which stands for 10.
    Quindecillion means 5 + 10 = 15. If you want the number of zeroes of that number (in american numbers)
    You multiply X (which is 15 in this scenario) by 3 and then you add another 3 which is 48.
    But in my country you would multiply X by 6. Which would mean that Quindecillion has 90 zeroes where i live.

  • @corygrell6340
    @corygrell6340 3 года назад +275

    You didn't even define Graham's Number.
    Now that we have specifically defined all of these things and given concrete examples of them in the universe, here is a term that is bigger with no definition, no comprehension, and no context. End of video.

    • @welcometoreality437
      @welcometoreality437 3 года назад +5

      Haha! It's still not even close to Rayo's Number.

    • @Paralativ
      @Paralativ 3 года назад +13

      What's about TREE(3) and the SSCG-function?

    • @billmanbillman7894
      @billmanbillman7894 3 года назад +2

      ҉ Paralativ i was just thinking this, grahams number, being as uncomprehensively large as it is, is miniscule in comparison to TREE(3)

    • @welcometoreality437
      @welcometoreality437 3 года назад +4

      @@billmanbillman7894 There's many more larger numbers than TREE(3). Rayo's number would be F(n) = The least number that cannot be uniquely described by an expression of first-order set theory that contains no more than n symbols. Rayo's number is then just F(10^100) though, we can still go even further with G(n) such that G(n) grows more quickly than F(n).
      At the end, these numbers still remain within the finite realm, once you leave you'll face with multiple infinities. The smallest infinity being Aleph 0, followed by Aleph 1, Aleph 2, Aleph 3...

    • @marnotto8269
      @marnotto8269 3 года назад +6

      @@welcometoreality437 if you use functions to define big numbers, it just gets boring... The point of TREE(3) and Graham's number is that they define really cool concepts, and are used in mathematical theories. TREE(3) describes the number of nodes you can build in a tree of 3 different nodes, and graham's number describes huge numbers of dimensions and vertecies (I'm not a mathematician, I just watch numberphile, so don't believe what I'm saying do the research)

  • @andysmith2160
    @andysmith2160 3 года назад +158

    If you counted to 1 million, your lips wouldn’t touch until you said “1 million”

  • @happyclub4972
    @happyclub4972 Год назад +1

    Your logo is really sick bro

  • @OctoBirb8Claws
    @OctoBirb8Claws 2 года назад +3

    something about the thumbnail: i calculated 2^1026 dollar thicknesses (2^1024 millimeters is much much less than graham's number) into light-years, and the amount of light-years was more than the amount of planck lengths in the universe.

  • @AMan-xz7tx
    @AMan-xz7tx 3 года назад +84

    Graham’s number in US dollars: you can’t defeat me
    The observable universe: I know, but he can
    *the US healthcare system

    • @dylanmcadam8509
      @dylanmcadam8509 3 года назад +3

      Grahams number in us dollars would actually be much much much bigger than the observable universe

    • @lefishe7431
      @lefishe7431 2 года назад

      Fr

    • @thecreatorvd3854
      @thecreatorvd3854 2 года назад

      after this final boss unlocked the real infinite universe

    • @Firefly256
      @Firefly256 2 года назад

      @@dylanmcadam8509 that’s exactly why the universe can’t beat graham number

  • @mamedvaifov2460
    @mamedvaifov2460 3 года назад +133

    Imagine knowing this when u were a kids . Arguments who is more stupid would have interesting results. Like “ no ur stupid Grahams number times!” “ noooo ur stupid Grahams number plus 1!”

    • @rishi91
      @rishi91 3 года назад +7

      but we knew infinity That was our Ultimate superpower 😂

    • @johannesvanderhorst9778
      @johannesvanderhorst9778 3 года назад

      @@rishi91 That didn't work in my youth. My sister said "I always have 1 more."

    • @BoibbleicecubebfdiMrexist
      @BoibbleicecubebfdiMrexist 3 года назад

      Yeah I’m literally a kid I’m about to watch this video at 10 years old

    • @amberthecinderacee836
      @amberthecinderacee836 3 года назад

      I'm a kid, and seeing this brightens my day, knowing an adult doesn't know what a multillion is, yet I, a 10-yr-old, do... yeet

    • @rishi91
      @rishi91 3 года назад

      @@amberthecinderacee836 who said that a adult doesn't know bout multitrillion

  • @errormac9
    @errormac9 2 года назад +4

    Don't forget about everything between Tree(3, 4, 5) and Rayo's number. Hell, might as well bring up countable infinity while we're at it.
    The definition of Rayo's number is a variation on the definition: The smallest number bigger than any finite number named by an expression in the language of first-order set theory with a googol symbols or less.

  • @phillipmarques8403
    @phillipmarques8403 2 года назад

    so insane to see how these people go in to their channel. What an amazing RUclips video, goddamn.

  • @GregJoughin
    @GregJoughin 3 года назад +194

    It really, REALLY bugs me that the "thousand-separator" commas are in the wrong places every time the googol is shown on screen.

    • @dumdum_plays
      @dumdum_plays 3 года назад +3

      I have a bigger number 1googolplexen it's 100googols to make Googleplexen

    • @Prefusify
      @Prefusify 3 года назад

      @@dumdum_plays a bigger number, the countable infinity

    • @sergejcvetkovic9805
      @sergejcvetkovic9805 3 года назад +1

      Do you have OCD or something?

    • @petterlarsson7257
      @petterlarsson7257 3 года назад

      @@dumdum_plays YOUR GRAMMAR AND SPELLING IS INCREDIBLE

    • @petterlarsson7257
      @petterlarsson7257 3 года назад

      @@dumdum_plays also 100 googol doesnt do anything

  • @WalidFeghali
    @WalidFeghali 2 года назад +757

    9:02 You're saying 10^94 books weigh as much as the Milky Way, when known atoms in the universe are 10^78. What am I missing here? They should weigh many magnitudes higher than all of the universe.

    • @saucysalamis9894
      @saucysalamis9894 2 года назад +47

      Yeah but there are objects in the Milky Way that are very small and very heavy such as neutron stars, and also we have at least 1 supermassive black hole which has a massive mass but relative to there mass don’t have atoms

    • @WalidFeghali
      @WalidFeghali 2 года назад +162

      @@saucysalamis9894 If you have more books than atoms in the universe, the books must weigh way more.

    • @saucysalamis9894
      @saucysalamis9894 2 года назад +27

      @@WalidFeghali well the books were being used as a comparison they didn’t mean it literally, I could say the milky green at weighs 10^10^1000 cockroaches, I’m not saying there is that many

    • @WalidFeghali
      @WalidFeghali 2 года назад +75

      There is 10^53 kg observable mass in the universe. All those books weigh more than 10^93 kg. I think they wrote it wrong in the video.

    • @jeffli071
      @jeffli071 2 года назад +10

      Because weight isn’t the same as volume

  • @JJJnl
    @JJJnl 2 года назад

    I think it's funny how he says de bruin hehe as a Dutch person it sounds hilarious 😅😅 anyway if you would count everything it be way more then whatever numbers you wanna make ))

  • @FebruaryHas30Days
    @FebruaryHas30Days 9 месяцев назад +3

    2:40 *31688 years

  • @giornogiovanna2299
    @giornogiovanna2299 3 года назад +54

    Googol: You can't defeat me!
    Quadrillion: I know, but he can..
    Googol Plex: *PERISH, YOU MORTAL*

  • @RedshiftYT
    @RedshiftYT 3 года назад +266

    largest number is how many years my dad has been gone to get milk

    • @justsomeguywithamask1564
      @justsomeguywithamask1564 3 года назад +6

      Just 15 years right

    • @SpaceIsAwesome0358
      @SpaceIsAwesome0358 3 года назад +10

      @@justsomeguywithamask1564
      no its graham’s number x itself about grahm’s number times

    • @golbox4
      @golbox4 3 года назад

      Not mine

    • @lemonpocky897
      @lemonpocky897 3 года назад +3

      Cringe that joke is overused

    • @envalence450
      @envalence450 3 года назад

      @@SpaceIsAwesome0358 are you high on serious drugs

  • @fisher9943
    @fisher9943 2 года назад

    2:16 " it's unlikely anyone could count to a billion" I
    Florida man: do you underestimate me?

  • @andrewbloom7694
    @andrewbloom7694 Год назад +1

    That thumbnail definitely isn't to scale, since even if each dollar was a plank length long it would be larger than the universe lol

  • @ligenyodu2645
    @ligenyodu2645 3 года назад +158

    imagine if 0 was never discovered. Indians must be proud.

  • @lennoxschmup8733
    @lennoxschmup8733 3 года назад +59

    2:17 ''its unlikely anyone chould count to a billion,its almost 32 years
    me: *counts to a billion in less then 10 seconds*
    ''you understemate my power''

  • @GreenHillSonic_Roblox
    @GreenHillSonic_Roblox Год назад +1

    "The biggest numbers in the world"
    Ah yes. I forgot that galaxies were on earth.

  • @lordwipes376
    @lordwipes376 2 года назад +2

    Him: no one can think of the largest number
    Him later: this is the largest number
    Me then: does not under stand
    Me later: Types a 8 then turns it 90 degrees

  • @trythismod4150
    @trythismod4150 3 года назад +190

    Fun fact : The largest number is how many time your crush ignore you

  • @joepiazza3756
    @joepiazza3756 3 года назад +26

    I love how the commas are off and the last 0 is on it's own.

  • @leatherneptune6631
    @leatherneptune6631 Год назад +1

    I loved watching this video and pretending I knew exactly what was going on.

  • @LordsOfMindset
    @LordsOfMindset Год назад +14

    me: *does graham's number + 1*

    • @reizinhodojogo3956
      @reizinhodojogo3956 Год назад +1

      graham sequence of g(g(g(g(g(g(g...(64))))))... is bigger than graham number + 1, also if u just add +1 the opponent will too and it will never end

    • @catpoisonlover
      @catpoisonlover Год назад

      G65

    • @wadewilson-xi1zs
      @wadewilson-xi1zs 2 месяца назад

      It doesn’t work like that, Graham‘s number is the dimension it would take for the lines in a type of hypercube to plane.

    • @cokxi
      @cokxi 2 месяца назад

      @@wadewilson-xi1zs idk what that is but sure, it does work that way, graham's number + 1 will be greater than grahams number, I mean any finite number + 1 would be greater than that finite number.

    • @wadewilson-xi1zs
      @wadewilson-xi1zs 2 месяца назад

      @@cokxi 😂

  • @glowstickqueen7139
    @glowstickqueen7139 3 года назад +20

    1:37 "1 THICC book"

  • @ringoferrer2343
    @ringoferrer2343 3 года назад +195

    Just to take into context how big Graham's number really is:
    (this is knots up arrow notation (just assume the lines in between the 3s are arrow ups))
    3|3= 27
    3||3=7.6Trillion
    3|||3= really big number
    3||||3= G1
    3||||...|[G1 no of arrows] 3 = G2
    3||||...|[G2 no of arrows] 3= G3
    .
    .
    .
    G64= Grahams number

    • @maharshi9999
      @maharshi9999 3 года назад +41

      well G65 is bigger than that.

    • @CharNatorn
      @CharNatorn 3 года назад +4

      Gstack

    • @Srontgorrth
      @Srontgorrth 3 года назад +8

      Tree3 laughs about that

    • @andrewzhang8512
      @andrewzhang8512 3 года назад +2

      @@Srontgorrth SCG(13) hehe

    • @Lokomasloko76
      @Lokomasloko76 3 года назад +7

      @@andrewzhang8512
      Rayo's number:
      JAJAJAJA (laughing in Mexican)

  • @King-Daphe
    @King-Daphe Год назад

    7:44 the way he said cool killed me 😂😂

  • @RAIOXBOX
    @RAIOXBOX 2 года назад +2

    "No matter how many gears there are, if you spin the first gear once, the last gear will move aswell. no matter if it moves a googolth of a turn, it will always move"

    • @reizinhodojogo3956
      @reizinhodojogo3956 Год назад

      wind is probaly moving more than that, in a year obviously

  • @pleasuretokill
    @pleasuretokill 3 года назад +30

    The opening graphic pic is so incredibly understated isnt funny. Grahams Number is so much larger than the size of our observable universe that if you could write each digit small enough to fit on an atom, you would run out of atoms in the universe to simply write the number out....by a lot. Like, the number that you did get by writing all 9s on every single atom in the universe wouldn't even come close to G1 and there's 64 layers in Grahams Number.

    • @sakshamsinghal5418
      @sakshamsinghal5418 2 года назад

      Yeah I think so cuz G1=3^7625597484987 when you put it in a calculator it just says infinity

    • @pleasuretokill
      @pleasuretokill 2 года назад +2

      @@sakshamsinghal5418 I'll put it to ya this way. Take 3^^^3. Not even G1, the step before it. 3, three arrows, 3.... is three to the power of 3... 7.6 TRILLION times! To count from 1 to 1 trillion if you were to say a number every second would take you 31,700 years. So, to count to 7.6 trillion at one number a second would take approximately 240,000 years or about as many years as man has been on planet Earth. Now.... imagine if it were possible to do the math of 3 to the power of 3 1 time, every second for 240,000 years. After just one day, the number would be so incredibly huge you wouldn't have room to write it down anywhere in your house.
      Now do that for a year. At that point you would likely run out of room in the universe as 3 to the power of itself compounds very quickly. Now, a century, then finally 240,000 years. 3^^^3, the number before G1 is so astronomically huge that your mind literally cannot comprehend it.

    • @sakshamsinghal5418
      @sakshamsinghal5418 2 года назад

      @@pleasuretokill wait I thought 3arrow3=27.
      3arrowarrow3=19683
      3arrowarrowarrow3=7625597484987
      G1=3^7625597484987

    • @pleasuretokill
      @pleasuretokill 2 года назад +1

      @@sakshamsinghal5418 No. 3^3 is 27. 3^^3 is 7.6 Trillion. 3^^^3 is a tower of 3's stacked on itself 7.6 Trillion times. You would have to write 3 to the power of itself until you reached the sun. That's how high the tower of 3s would stack if you wrote a normal 3 like you would on a piece of paper. 3^^^^3 is 3^^^3, 7.6 Trillion times. The number that you get from 3^^^^3 is the number of arrows in G1. (sorry, I kept writing 3.7 trillion, I have no idea why, probably too many 3s...lol. It's 7.6 Trillion.)

    • @LC19.
      @LC19. 2 года назад

      @@sakshamsinghal5418 you mean 3↑↑4 but G1 is = 3↑↑↑↑3

  • @SuperNikolaras
    @SuperNikolaras 3 года назад +45

    Biggest number is the 60 secs when you do a plank and everyone knows that.

  • @garvinmedera9573
    @garvinmedera9573 3 месяца назад

    cool
    Thanks for helping us with the numbers

  • @Enlightenment0172
    @Enlightenment0172 9 месяцев назад

    Googology Wiki:
    “Hold my beer.”

  • @invaziondzxn4716
    @invaziondzxn4716 2 года назад +8

    5:10 Mission failed successfully

  • @te-bo7618
    @te-bo7618 3 года назад +43

    “What’s the largest comprehensible number” is a realistic line to say. Or ‘phrase’.

  • @preetunadkat7083
    @preetunadkat7083 2 года назад +1

    2:16
    Goku casually doing a BILLION pushups as his daily routine

  • @paull2937
    @paull2937 2 года назад +237

    If Graham’s number is far bigger than all the Planck volume in the known universe, and since a dollar bill is much larger than a Planck volume, then Graham’s number in US dollars would be much, much more massive than what you showed in your thumbnail. Graham’s number dollars is much, much more than filling the whole universe with 100 dollar bills.

    • @santo8813
      @santo8813 2 года назад

      Clickbait. Ass video lol

    • @martinplayer2348
      @martinplayer2348 Год назад +15

      Yeah that's actually what I was thinking about😂😂
      Cool that we have the same thoughts!

    • @bryantofsomething5964
      @bryantofsomething5964 Год назад +23

      If you put the amount of atoms in the observable universe as the amount of arrows between something like a googol and a googolplex, you would still be nowhere near graham's number.

    • @martinplayer2348
      @martinplayer2348 Год назад +3

      @@bryantofsomething5964 wtf🤯🤯

    • @archieburns6260
      @archieburns6260 Год назад

      The whole observable universe

  • @JDog_Vlogs
    @JDog_Vlogs 3 года назад +56

    Im gonna start counting to a googol boys, wish me luck🙏

    • @trunzlerclement3227
      @trunzlerclement3227 3 года назад +23

      Don't do it. But let the flat earthers count. At least they'll do something useful 😂😂🤣

    • @JDog_Vlogs
      @JDog_Vlogs 3 года назад +5

      @@trunzlerclement3227 you couldn't have said it better😂😂😭

    • @trunzlerclement3227
      @trunzlerclement3227 3 года назад +1

      @@JDog_Vlogs 😂😂😂

    • @richardhoak7384
      @richardhoak7384 3 года назад +2

      @@trunzlerclement3227 I love that idea LOL! 😀😀😅😅😄😄😃😃

    • @annunegi6462
      @annunegi6462 3 года назад

      You don't need luck, you need some extra mouth 😋

  • @ilijaradosavljevic4976
    @ilijaradosavljevic4976 2 года назад

    When he daid "You need 38 day to count a billuon" i started counting. 😂

  • @kristinakoprek629
    @kristinakoprek629 10 месяцев назад

    the boundary number of infity (or at least biggest known that is not infinity) is utter oblivion, iti is the largest finite number known and is uniquely definable using no more than n symbols in some K(n) system in some K2(n) 2-system in some K3(n) 3-system in some... and it keeps going on utter oblivion times in some Kn(n) n-system where n can be defined by 1 symbol, where a Km(k) m-system is an arbitrary complete, the next number is infinity

  • @vadimev
    @vadimev 3 года назад +241

    “10^94 books would weigh more than the Milky Way galaxy.” Umm, I should hope so, since there are only 10^80 atoms in the entire known universe. Did they forget that fact half way through the video? Smh.

    • @AlexJones-ue1ll
      @AlexJones-ue1ll 3 года назад +5

      Yop, they appearently forgot that tiny piece of information.

    • @aeryxis956
      @aeryxis956 3 года назад +1

      black holes ig

    • @sorry6726
      @sorry6726 3 года назад +3

      Since there is 95% dark matter and energy , so

    • @AlexJones-ue1ll
      @AlexJones-ue1ll 3 года назад +9

      @@sorry6726 so what? Doesnt change the fact that he stated there are 10^80 atoms in the (known) universe, yet 10^94 books would weigh as much as the whole galaxy. That doesnt add up. Unless you now a way to print a book on 10^-15 atoms

    • @TheAgamemnon911
      @TheAgamemnon911 3 года назад +3

      Thanks. I also hate it when YT videos do this.

  • @TheRealMcCoy88
    @TheRealMcCoy88 3 года назад +37

    Me: checks account balance......... ah man only $92 quadrillion left in my account, what am I to do with such peasant money 😂

    • @tqhyxl_9966
      @tqhyxl_9966 3 года назад +3

      smh i have 48 trillion left in my bank account

    • @armanlifts
      @armanlifts 3 года назад +3

      Bruh I only have 100 graham 😭😭😭

    • @desbugfan8429
      @desbugfan8429 3 года назад

      I only have, like, 170.

    • @altar8010
      @altar8010 3 года назад

      Noooooooo i have only 10^Graham number ^googol plex x 10 ^septrillion dollar

    • @user-ys2lz1nn4q
      @user-ys2lz1nn4q 3 года назад

      lol, i have only 25 sen, this is no joking, what should i do

  • @chiupapimunianio3473
    @chiupapimunianio3473 Год назад +3

    6:12 non of supermassive black hole have equal mass to galaxies, it doesn't even have 2% of galaxy mass.

    • @cabbageboi6365
      @cabbageboi6365 Год назад +2

      Ummmm
      There's a black hole named TON 618 and has a mass of 66,000,000,000 suns. The third largest galaxy in our galactic local group (the triangulum galaxy) has a mass of 50,000,000,000 suns. The amount of matter needed to make that black hole is literally more than the amount needed to make a major galaxy.

  • @carlosgc9384
    @carlosgc9384 10 месяцев назад

    "¿Is the googolplex the highest number in the world?"
    My brain: googolplex plus 1

  • @expired6522
    @expired6522 3 года назад +42

    riddddddddddddddle: billion this where we get serious
    me: :O
    teacher: what is a billion?
    me: a place where we get serious
    teacher: correct

    • @kerbodynamicx472
      @kerbodynamicx472 3 года назад

      Expired 💯

    • @fsjal_scout7944
      @fsjal_scout7944 3 года назад

      Asian af

    • @expired6522
      @expired6522 3 года назад

      @@fsjal_scout7944 im not asian

    • @fsjal_scout7944
      @fsjal_scout7944 3 года назад

      Expired that’s not what I mean but ok

    • @stevevanzandt6784
      @stevevanzandt6784 3 года назад

      An endless billion times infinity/eternity how much is that number gonna be about &amount to???🐈🐈🐈🦆🦆🤷‍♀️🤷‍♀️🤷‍♀️😻🦆🌞🌞🌞🌞🐧🐧🐧

  • @user-ws6bu1yb9i
    @user-ws6bu1yb9i 3 года назад +39

    Can they do a scale of kyriakos grizzly vs the entire universe

    • @mitskifan5875
      @mitskifan5875 3 года назад

      He would die because of a black hole

  • @BrianHanifan
    @BrianHanifan Год назад

    With Graham's number worth of US Dollars and I still wouldn't have enough money to buy all the DLC for Train Simulator

  • @WheresYourMotivationAt
    @WheresYourMotivationAt 10 месяцев назад

    every wheat grain in a chess board except each square doubles the wheat grains.

  • @remaudy6409
    @remaudy6409 3 года назад +66

    Me after watching this: “Google... googol... google. What’s google? Why does it sound weird now??

  • @XeptorKingGG
    @XeptorKingGG 3 года назад +113

    Riddddle: "A Billion. Now this is where it gets serious."
    My teacher:"What type of serious activities Have you Kids Been doing Today?"
    Me:"*A Billion.*"
    Teacher: "Wh-"
    Me:"*A BILLION!*"

  • @ZachTeeVee
    @ZachTeeVee Год назад +4

    I wish they made a mechanism in game like that 😅

  • @veyvoda4413
    @veyvoda4413 Год назад

    The second he said googol I said “okay that enough for me let’s leave this video before my brain litterey over heats and my computer

  • @SommetiderHvorforDetRoligRolig
    @SommetiderHvorforDetRoligRolig 3 года назад +154

    If you manually turned the last wheel All the way around in 1 second, would that then make the first wheel go faster then the speed of light? I know its not possible for it to go faster, and btw.. I feel like it would take an extreme amount of force to spin the last wheel?

    • @gabrielzellweger3465
      @gabrielzellweger3465 3 года назад +8

      The speed of light, or the speed of information is closely related to infinity. You need a literal infinite amount of energy, to bring the machine up to that speed. Witch btw. i guess, only takes around 10 decimals off of 1 Googol seconds; down to 10 to the power of 90 seconds.
      What you revering to, is imagined Information. A shadow for example "can" travel over the speed of light, but only because it is the absence of stuff (light casting the shadow). Imagine you casting a shadow on the moon with your hand. That shadow can now move over light speed with a simple hand gesture but your hand and the light around your shadow still cant.
      Anything out of mater simply cant do that. The machine would break or you would never have enough juice to reach over lightspeed RPM.

    • @jessebrown4347
      @jessebrown4347 3 года назад +8

      Yeah it would probably take a googolplex of torque to attempt to rotate the last gear, and the gears would probably shatter if you tried lol

    • @2mjz84
      @2mjz84 3 года назад +7

      How about instead of people saying “The gears would Just break” make stronger gears⚙️? Very simple solution then attach a fucking 9000hp engine to the Gears and spin that bastard as hard as possible it would still probably take a long time but its still faster than doing it yourself 😂🤷‍♂️ get something graphene for the gears and you’re all set

    • @asktheetruscans9857
      @asktheetruscans9857 3 года назад +4

      You're one of those people that breaks the Rubic's cube and puts it back together, right?!

    • @roff000
      @roff000 3 года назад

      Hmmm good Idea lol

  • @MusicLover-gp6dl
    @MusicLover-gp6dl 3 года назад +15

    6:01
    So can you imagine just how big..
    **Ad plays**
    Old Spice for men.

  • @daniyalkhan1702
    @daniyalkhan1702 7 месяцев назад

    Fun fact, if you were to pick any random positive integer, the chance of it being lower than Graham’s number, tree3, googleplexian, things like that is 0 percent chance.

  • @amandalee3144
    @amandalee3144 Год назад

    Man that machine kinda makes life feel to short

  • @abrahamvasquez6376
    @abrahamvasquez6376 3 года назад +23

    So weird to hear this guy not scream “hey arnold”

  • @kaybrae2967
    @kaybrae2967 3 года назад +4

    Nice video, Ridddle! Great job!

  • @rippedtorn2310
    @rippedtorn2310 2 года назад

    When you've been dead for a Googolplex years ...you haven't even started .

  • @Renderthetender
    @Renderthetender 10 месяцев назад

    I know somthing that u can describe for googol the amount of years until his dad comes back

  • @colinjenkins0
    @colinjenkins0 3 года назад +6

    This dude is awesome, he edits his videos perfectly, and always keeps grinding, keep it up bro

    • @santo8813
      @santo8813 2 года назад +1

      It’s filled with misinformation, it’s also really rushed and really lazy.

    • @fandroid6491
      @fandroid6491 2 года назад

      Lmao just look at the googol number, the commas are put in the wrong place and that one pesky 0 keeps bugging me.

  • @lostowens5810
    @lostowens5810 3 года назад +21

    7:40 it was on daily does of internet also

  • @wwz9155
    @wwz9155 2 года назад

    ‘A trillion bacteria takes up no more than a cube of sugar’
    Imagine a cube of sugar size worth of bacteria sitting on your table

  • @michaelbotha9500
    @michaelbotha9500 Год назад

    The number of all possible molecular combinations using all the atoms in the universe, in all their respective phases.

  • @91AkirA91
    @91AkirA91 2 года назад +13

    I like the fact that I asked myself what is the biggest number we can imagine, searched for it on yt and Riddle appeared. Thank you for answering my existential questions.

    • @aswinshrestha372
      @aswinshrestha372 Год назад

      technically tree(3) is even bigger than grahams number and rayo's number is even bigger being bigger than tree(grahams number) and even bigger than tree(tree(tree(tree(tree^^^^999tree)

  • @JunaidRiazAlHassan
    @JunaidRiazAlHassan 3 года назад +89

    .. Somewhere between
    “ 8 toffees for 1 rupee” and
    “1 toffee for 8 rupees”,
    we grew up!
    Somewhere between
    “Ground mai aaja” (Come to the park) and
    “Online aaja”, (Come online)
    we grew up!
    Somewhere between
    “stealing chocolate of our sister” and “Buying chocolate for her children”,
    we grew up!
    Somewhere between
    “Just five more mins Maa” and “Pressing the snooze button”,
    we grew up!
    Somewhere between
    “Crying out loud just to get what we want” and
    “Holding our tears when we are broken inside”,
    we grew up!
    Somewhere between
    “I want to grow up” and
    “I want to be a child again”,
    we grew up!
    Somewhere between
    “Lets meet and plan” and
    “Lets plan and meet”,
    we grew up!
    Somewhere between
    "Being afraid of our parents"
    and
    "Praying for our parents" we finally grew up
    And as we grew up, we realize;
    How silently, our lives have changed.....

  • @YHTheGamer
    @YHTheGamer 3 года назад +39

    How about Rayo's number? That number is huge as well!

    • @hamadmustafa9854
      @hamadmustafa9854 3 года назад +8

      Yeah... He didn't do complete research.

    • @XenXenOfficial
      @XenXenOfficial 3 года назад +13

      There's a lot of different large numbers lol Smith's number, Googolplexian, Skewes Number, Tree(3), etc. He made the video 10 minutes long since you can fit a few more ads in a relatively short video.

    • @jonahwilliams1835
      @jonahwilliams1835 3 года назад +1

      Yea seriously

    • @whitrenee1
      @whitrenee1 3 года назад

      YH The Gamer Or BIG FOOT! Does That Count

    • @golightning291
      @golightning291 3 года назад +2

      someone's been watching Numberphileeee

  • @sardorbek6399
    @sardorbek6399 9 месяцев назад

    I've heard about the edge of the numbers and it's called the absolute true end

  • @wendygales1208
    @wendygales1208 2 года назад

    Can you make a video of a real rocket launch going out of the universe into another one and see how different universes is

    • @Sk1D420
      @Sk1D420 2 года назад

      Rocket is very primitive technology, and it would take an infinite number of years to reach the nearest galaxy.
      The most fascinating thing is even light speed is not enough, still it would take thousands of years to travel to the nearest galaxy.
      And oh boy don't talk about universe traveling it is impossible to make.

  • @spartan4045
    @spartan4045 3 года назад +44

    Poor Graham, everyone in his life is probably asking for money

    • @whitrenee1
      @whitrenee1 3 года назад

      Stephen Kerr Ya

    • @whitrenee1
      @whitrenee1 3 года назад

      Stephen Kerr I Agree With You

    • @BrutalBeast666
      @BrutalBeast666 3 года назад

      Yeah, good thing he died like three weeks ago.

    • @whitrenee1
      @whitrenee1 3 года назад

      BrutalBeast666 So Where Did You Hear It

    • @BrutalBeast666
      @BrutalBeast666 3 года назад

      @@whitrenee1 www.ams.org/news?news_id=6244