1:34 actually you can 1 for 1 translate from one language too another language. As some languages are more precise than others in different areas. Examples. 1) Some languages don't have a word for blue. 2) Some languages have five levels of distance , some have 3 & some have 7 levels. 3) Some languages are gendered ( everything has female or male ) and some have 3 types ( male , female & neutral ) 4) some languages use limited range of words that get re-combined to make new words.
FWIW, there's been word that Paizo will allow publishing material with the CUP and ORC license that refers to pre-ORC content, just so long as you don't reprint whole sections of text.
A great discussion. Enlightening. A shame that its so much work to convert stuff between editions and/or systems as there are some real gems out there that i missed out on
That is my problem, i play Pathfinder and not Pathfinder 2E, but people say Pathfinder when they mean Pathfinder 2E! Pathfinder 2E looks good, but i can't play my current primary current character(Rogue/Swashbuckler) in Pathfinder 2E : (
@@shallendor Multiclass archetypes exist in PF2e. Free archetype variant rule makes it an easy add-on. If you're doing like a straight 50/50 split, see if the GM will let you play at level -1 with dual classing.
@@animeboy400 Party Level - 1. So if the party is level 4, you play a dual-class (gestalt) character at level 3. A rogue/swashbuckler would be a highly complimentary dual-class, which the PF2e rules for dual-classing suggest is worth an effective +1 level.
The flight thing at the start, it's just dumb. One of those things which really doesn't make any sense, and it is an example of flavor and fun butchered at the altar of "balance". Essentially. If you're not going to let an ancestry fly right from Level 1, don't make it playable. Same with things like automatons and skeletons somehow needing to worry about disease and poison. There is a line of going too far with balance. But PF2e is also the edition where Paladins somehow lost the ability to ignore disease so.
The real conversion was the friends we made along the way.
1:34 actually you can 1 for 1 translate from one language too another language.
As some languages are more precise than others in different areas.
Examples.
1) Some languages don't have a word for blue.
2) Some languages have five levels of distance , some have 3 & some have 7 levels.
3) Some languages are gendered ( everything has female or male ) and some have 3 types ( male , female & neutral )
4) some languages use limited range of words that get re-combined to make new words.
FWIW, there's been word that Paizo will allow publishing material with the CUP and ORC license that refers to pre-ORC content, just so long as you don't reprint whole sections of text.
1:54:06: Rubber duck programming is fantastic.
A great discussion. Enlightening. A shame that its so much work to convert stuff between editions and/or systems as there are some real gems out there that i missed out on
This is so cool!
To stop confusion I would have put pathfinder 2e in the title not pathfinder because pathfinder 1e is still a thing a lot of people play.
That is my problem, i play Pathfinder and not Pathfinder 2E, but people say Pathfinder when they mean Pathfinder 2E! Pathfinder 2E looks good, but i can't play my current primary current character(Rogue/Swashbuckler) in Pathfinder 2E : (
@@shallendor
Multiclass archetypes exist in PF2e. Free archetype variant rule makes it an easy add-on. If you're doing like a straight 50/50 split, see if the GM will let you play at level -1 with dual classing.
What the h is -1 leve?
@@animeboy400
Party Level - 1. So if the party is level 4, you play a dual-class (gestalt) character at level 3. A rogue/swashbuckler would be a highly complimentary dual-class, which the PF2e rules for dual-classing suggest is worth an effective +1 level.
It is utterly untrue to say you cannot play a rogue-swashbuckler in 2e.
"Don't make this mistake!"
You mean converting anything into Pathfinder? Yeah, I agree.
The flight thing at the start, it's just dumb. One of those things which really doesn't make any sense, and it is an example of flavor and fun butchered at the altar of "balance". Essentially. If you're not going to let an ancestry fly right from Level 1, don't make it playable. Same with things like automatons and skeletons somehow needing to worry about disease and poison. There is a line of going too far with balance. But PF2e is also the edition where Paladins somehow lost the ability to ignore disease so.