2022 Mazda CX-5 GT SP (2.5 turbo) 0-100km/h & engine sound
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 8 сен 2024
- 2022 Mazda CX-5 GT SP (2.5 turbo) 0-100km/h & engine sound. Head over to performancedri... for the full review.
2022 Mazda CX-5 GT SP
2.5-litre turbo-petrol four-cylinder
170kW (231PS) and 420Nm
Six-speed auto, all-wheel drive
For more stats and test results simply head over to our performance data page: performancedriv...
If you are interested in buying a new car, we can help you. Our car buying team has saved buyers thousands of dollars. We do the haggling for you. Interested? Simply provide us with some details here so we can get started: performancedriv...
For all of our latest reviews head here: performancedri...
And our latest car news head here: performancedri...
Follow Brett Davis on Instagram: / brettdaviscars
And PerformanceDrive's official Instagram: / performancedrive
Exciting stuff starts at 3:55
More like 6:48
@@slyarsenal😂
Thanks
Always satisfying to see 99.9L/100km at full throttle. Achievement unlocked!
You will find in the second row in the middle armrest where the cup holders are there are two USB phone chargers 🤓
Correct!
It’s crazy that this cx5 is faster from 0-100 than my mini clubman Cooper S!
How’s it crazy? The Clubman cooper s are hardly quick.
@@madrx2 what he meant is because that car is smaller and lighter than CX-5
@@arvin6606 sort of like comparing a Toyota 86 to an x5-m?
@@arvin6606 yeah that’s what I meant. Also just didn’t realise that the cx5 was quick at all let alone faster than mine.
check Subaru outback xt 5.6sec 0-100 faster than auto wrx haha
Exterior and engine are great, interior could go for an overhaul like the one on the Mazda 3, CX-30 and CX-60
Agreed. And Mazda, I STG, please don't put start-stop on your cars!
Still a stellar looking car with good performance. Still one of the best in class.
However, it is starting to lack compared to newer alternatives. RAV4 and Tiguan comes into mind.
Tiguan came out 2016; CX-5 came out 2017
RAV4 has a woeful infotainment system. 😅
Cx5 feels the most expensive
@@haydenlane5028 google 2023 RAV 4 updates. Finally moving into the 2020’s. Not cutting edge but def an improvement.
Still very surprised that it’s not much quicker than a 2T CX-9. I’d have thought 6.9 0-100 would be on the cards given the 300kg weight difference (cx9 was high 7.89 0-100 )
Mazda US report a 0-60mph time of 6.1 seconds. Real world tests in videos on RUclips seem to achieve close to that (most around 6.3 seconds). I have no idea why Australian 0-100 kmph times are so much worse. The CX-5 does have different tunes for regular and premium fuel resulting in more power and torque with premium (170kw vs 190kw translating from the US horsepower figures). The lower power tune as a result of regular fuel could be at play in this test.
@@ausreaction Maybe different fuel was used. I read that with 99 petrol it can do mid 6 seconds or so.
Mazda makes nice cars.
The fromt light looks a little bit like BMW
And cow goes moo. What are you trying to say?
@@GreatGrandmasterWang I tried, and succeeded, in saying that Mazda makes nice cars. What’s your issue?
@@user2144 it's obvious that mazda makes nice cars. That's like saying the sky is blue and cow goes moo.
@@GreatGrandmasterWang That’s twice now that you have stated that a cow goes moo. You must really like cows. According to you, I can’t say that I like Mazda’s cars, in a COMMENT section, because it is “obvious”, but you can say - twice - that a cow goes moo (a super obvious thing)? Ok, chief. Whatever you say.
I was surprised at the times to 100, it looks and sound slower but I guess that is due to the lack of noise. Not a bad little car, a bit like a Camry, nothing fancy, just gets the job done without shouting, 'look at me'.
Camry V6 for the SUV generation
Yes, and it seems to attract the same type of driver as an old Camry as well.
Got my turbo a few weeks ago, damn this has lots of zoom zoom when needed.
Isnt it at the center armrest 2nd row seat, rear usb charger slot?
I dont get it, how come redline review n alex auto did 0-60miles in 6.6 seconds but here is in 7.5 seconds?
They are nice, however as mentioned the gear ratios are short but very big in between changes and I think thats whats killing the performance with these things. Good mid end usable torque though.
Yes it was primarily designed for the Cx-9 back in 2016 to feel like a diesel but appease the Yanks by using petrol instead. An interesting engine dictated by the market demand.
6 years on, it has since appeared to be a very reliable engine. I quite like it even if it’s not “fast”.
I have actually tried in manual mode and shift at red line, it was slower than shifting around 5k-6k rpm
Given what the car is intended for - not sure "killing performance" is the phrase I'd use. I have a '24 CX-5 Turbo and the shifts are buttery smooth, torque is abundant and performance at altitude in our Western U.S. mountains is terrific.
Mazda by not making that eng available in the lower variant lost a sale .Part reason for the success of the RAV4 is there signature hybrid drive train is available through out the range not just the top spec
Wish we got the Mazda 3 turbo 😭
I am guessing high octane fuel is not very common in Australia or something, usually this car gets a much quicker time.
Not bad. I thought it was odd that gear changes happened well before redline. Maybe performance could be better if it went all the way.
Turbo engines are different that way compared to naturally aspirated where more rpm means more power. Peak power is at 5000rpm for this engine and since it's got a lot of torque at lower rpm, taking it past its peak power to redline doesn't make sense because that's not where the power is.
p drive said in one of the comments that it went slower by revving it out higher.
max power on this engine is only at 5000rpm. no need to change gear passed that.
@@fakenews3676 could be a bad factory tune. Who knows, they sell a speed pack option for 2k and just remap the ecu to unlock the full potential. A lot of manufactures are doing shifty stuff like that.
Nope, usable power is down low, which makes it a great engine to drive. Revving more is slower than getting back into the peak torque range in the next gear.
Mushy Suspension!? In Sep.22 I test drove the GT SP and appreciated the stiffer suspension all the reviews talk about. Coming from a Subaru it was a big deciding factor for me. Just picked up my 2022 Akera (built Oct.22) and have put 600km touring on it in 2 days. Have they changed the suspension or is the Akera tuned differently to the GT...for 75 year-olds (no ageism intended)? Yes it soaks up bumps but it wallows and dives through bends....not Zoom Zoom at all.
Going in for the 1k service next week. Is there anything they can do to stiffen it up (please, please, please)?
It actually does have charging points in the rear middle fold down arm rest FYI…
Looking at buying one of these. Interested to see if what its like as a highway car?? What were your thoughts? What RPM were you sitting on doing 110-120kmph on the hwy.
I have 2021 Akera turbo due to being a 6 speed it’s around 2100rpm on the hwy. around town driving for the first 12k has averaged 10.9ltr on 98.
Did you buy one? What do you think of so…. I got a touring active diesel last July and I’m getting 6L /100km and under. Not that impressed with the interior comfort to be honest. Engine and drive is great though.
Is this done on the 91, 95, or the 98octan?
98
@@PDriveTV Thank you.
thank you I just bought the car needed it
Skyactive Turbo the best engine
3yrs ago, it did the 100 in 7.6secs on this channel
Was this test done using premium fuel or regular octane?
Regular... I actually am bi
Overall is great except that dashboard design. and could be timeless exterior design compared to other.
Nice car, but they could've tuned the engine to produce more power.
It’s a reserved engine designed for low to mid range torque. I think it will be much more reliable in the long run.
@@OfficialMINIm yes, probably
I like ceiling fans
Would love to but I dont think it will handle that well
@@therealkrisjenner is it possible to tune ceiling fans for more power?
Really confused about the Aus 2.5T cx-5 compare with US one, they have article (such as motortrend) indicated 0-60miles in 6.1s, 6.5s etc, why does Aus videos about this car review all have like around 7.5s 0-100km/h (#98 fuel). Do we actually use the same engine... ORZ
Turbo engines works best in optimal conditions. High temperature and humidity won't help it
@@Has7DCT thanks for the info. As long as we both use the same 2.5 T engine all around the world. I’ll assume that Aus(PD test) is the worst case scenario, LoL. Just brought a turbo Akera but still in transaction. Can’t wait to try it. XD
0-60 test is flawed. Look it up on RUclips.
Alfa 2.0tb gauges (for example) would fit this drivetrain but this gives me automotive version of ocd.
Hey also was the 0-100 time recorded using standard fuel or premium 98 Ron fuel ? As the performance should be better on the higher rated fuel given it creates more power ? Thoughts …
good question!
Would be good to see if it was 91 what difference 98 makes on the times. I run 98 in mine - maybe the first tank from dealership was 91 but I only know what 98 feels like. 11l/100km @$2.40 hurts a little.
@@alig2025dealer told me to keep running it at 91. I was going to use premium but then again I don’t need more zoom zoom from it. I might ask the guys at the Mazda service department what they think.
Is the turbo 2.5 cx8 consume more fuel than the na 2.5?
Does it run on Boost Juice
It's slower(or very similar) than my ten year old 2 litre turbo Tiguan??
if you use PULP your power output would increase to 187kw and faster acceleration.
We did. 98 RON
Send link for gle 450 vs gle 400d
Sounds more throaty in the video than in real life .
How does it feel compare to an Subie SJ fxt? Is it a lil bit faster? What things do you like about it compare to the forester xt? Which would you prefer? Sorry for a bunch of questions got so much excited when I saw this HAHHAA.
The Forester is slow as shit. They did it another recent video.
@@User-cb4jm he's talking about the XT 2.0 TURBO version of the previous generation
It's much slower though, the XT can do 0-100 in around 6s in S mode.
Seems this 2.5T engine is tuned for low-rpm torque and towing, not drag race acceleration.
Still, 0-100 in 7.5s is plenty fast for highway driving and the low stress will help with long term reliability. The XT is performance-oriented anyway
@@nvnh319 yuh I own an xt. So it does do 0-100 in 6s damn, my best time is just about low 7s. When should I use the S# mode if the S mode is good for the acceleration?
@@louisuhhh_4546 People said S is better than S# for 0-100
If that's the case then S# doesn't really make any sense 😳
Why is upshifting around 5k rpm? Can be quicker i think
We tried manual shifting at higher revs, and it was slower. Peak power for this engine is reached at 5000rpm.
Great car and goes well, brother just bought one but I hate the infotainment is not touch screen. The dial is a pain to use and the interior is too bland. The lack of a fully digital dash is also starting to look old. Still a good car but those things put me off buying a Mazda
Turbo must be designed for low down torque and runs out of efficiency on top end , see you shifting a 5k .
Yes the engine only revs to 5500rpm
Yes it was primarily designed for the Cx-9 back in 2016 to feel like a diesel but appease the Yanks by using petrol instead. An interesting engine dictated by the market demand.
6 years on, it has since appeared to be a very reliable engine. I quite like it even if it’s not “fast”.
It is shifting in a very low rpm, 5200!
1/4 mile time is the real 402 meters time or is with 1ft rollout ?
We never include any rollout. 1/4 mile measurement is set to 1/4 mile on the Vbox, not 0-400m. Hope that helps
@@PDriveTV I think on the VBOX you have to choose between "402m" and "1/4 mile". Difference between them is that "1/4 mile" time is WITH 1ft rollout and "402m" time is the real one (same om Dragy Performance Meter).
@@Eugen-E No, we use a Vbox Sport which requires the official Racelogic app. There is a separate setting for rollout.
Each run actually shows both 1/4 mile and 0-400m result, as well as 0-160, 0-200, 80-120 etc (and whatever other timeframe you want to add in) all in the same run. But we only quote the 1/4 mile time, not 0-400.
@@PDriveTV what is the difference between 400m and 1/4 mile ?
I've seen this on the same device as yours. There was a 1/4 mile time and a 402m time.
@@Eugen-E 0-400m is 0-400m. 1/4 mile is 402.336m. This is what the Vbox results look like: performancedrive.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/2022-Porsche-Taycan-Turbo-Cross-Turismo-quarter-mile-Vbox-results.jpg
This should be a sub 7 second car. Not exactly fast, even for an SUV.
Redline review and alex autos did 0-60 miles in 6.5seconds
Dont know why in here n carexpert, ausi youtuber, did in 7.5seconds
@@TheGillederais It has a lot to do with octane rating of the fuel. The engine makes more power on 93 octane as the manufacturer clearly tells us.
ALFA Romeo Stelvio 2.0 T - 5,87!🤷🏻♂️
Isnt this supposed to be the performance engine from Mazda? Why does it rev like a diesel?
@Fraser tuned for efficiency and still has fuel economy of an old V6…
@Fraser But why? Its comparitively slow and inefficient. Why don't they at least tune it for performance if they know its never going to be efficient?
I need this engine in my miata nd 😂
Ayo 2.5 Turbo + RWD = Heaven daily
And maybe Rav4 Plug in ?
Non existent in Australia unfortunately, only a regular hybrid here. Think they have a rav4 prime overseas which is plug in though.
It will be faster with manual transmission
nice BMW lights， more bmw looking than the ugly new bimmers lol
7.7 seconds 0-100km?? I'm getting between 6.6- 6.8
What timing equipment are you using?
@@PDriveTV redline review n alex autos youtuber do 0-60mph which equivalent of 0-100kph in around 6.5seconds.. go to search "mazda cx-5 2022 redline review", sofyan did it 2 times in 6.3seconds and 6.61 seconds
heck even some of them mentioning 6.1 seconds lol.. its quiet bizarre that you n carexpert hv similar time, yet american reviewer says otherwise.
maybe you didnt put ron 98 or you did put ron 98 but the engine used the "old" ron hence low 0-100, also there are 2 usb type A ports with 2.1volts at the back seat in the middle console..
@@TheGillederais It's very difficult to compare results from different countries. The cars could use a different tune, spec, with different quality fuel and even different weather conditions. Hope that helps.
Also, a lot of American testers (including Motor Trend) use a 1-foot rollout - we never include any rollout. Keep in mind 60mph is actually 97km/h as well. It makes a difference, especially with average to slower cars 👍
@@PDriveTV i believe it has the same engine specs, cx5 made in hiroshima factory in japan. Different suspension tune, probably, but not the engine. Hv you watched the redline review? There is no "rollout", it was from standing still. Also 0.344km makes 1.2seconds different when the car already moving, i doubt it.
Highly likely due to fuel quality here.
Why is the shifting at 5000 rpm?
Peak power is reached at 5000rpm. We tried manual shifting during Vbox testing, letting the engine rev to around 5700rpm between shifts. It was slower.
@@PDriveTV as a Cx9 owner, it’s nice to know why they calibrated the shifts that way :).
sadly... 90's design
The 2022 Ford Escape AWD is more powerful, faster and better on fuel for less $$$$.
Ford? Have you seen all of their recalls lately? Company has gone to sh...poop.
Slower then my 2016 xc60 t5-awd with a 8 speed and not as well appointed not a bad car thought.
mate your xc60 cost 2x more than the cx5 and had atleast 150hp more , no point in comparing
That 0-100km/h is pretty underwhelming considering that a FWD base model with the non-turbo version of that 2.5 engine can do it in 7.7 secs.
Maybe if you throw if it off a cliff...I have a version of that n/a 2.5 in my older Mazda 6, and they're always around 8 to 8.5 sec in real world
@@alenalavanja6543 Maybe because your 6 is heavier than the barebones CX-5. How much does it weigh? The CX-5 I'm talking about is only 1455kg.
Consider the octane rating Ivan. They may not have used the premium fuel here. Mazda clearly states a nice power gain going to 93 octane.
5000rpm, might aswell just buy a diesel. What a joke.
A diesel just makes noise over 4000.
Sounds like you’re driving a tractor and has weird Adblue requirements. Diesels are dead.
What a joke. Have fun getting up to 100kmh in under 8 seconds in any diesel
@@User-cb4jm the diesel CX-5 doesn’t use AdBlue
@@therealkrisjenner I have the 2016 CX-5 diesel. My 0-100 time is 8.3 seconds, but who cares. Who buys a crossover/suv for 0-100 times? The in-gear torque is a bunch, I can overtake, merge, or go up any hill with ease. If 0-100 is that important to you, you are looking at the wrong kind of car mate, better look at a hot hatch or a coupe.
It's a cheap massed produced car made by a highly dodgy company.
Maintenance wise you will pay excessively when it is out of warranty.
Performs as tinny as it sounds.
Tell us what you really think
Mazda's diesels 2012 to 2018 were problematic if not driven in freeways regularly(to burn of DPF) . Mazda had been replacing these engines even out of warranty though . Unless you do illegal modification like retune with chips etc.
Dogy how lol
@@claygaudet5724 try dealing with Mazda and you will quickly learn.
@@SamboC177 so I shouldn't buy a cx5 for no reason says you