2021 Nordica Enforcer 100 Ski Review
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 6 окт 2024
- Nordica has updated one of the most popular skis in the world, the Enforcer 100! Of course, we had to test it out for ourselves.
Written Review: www.skiessenti...
2020 Enforcer 100 Review: www.skiessenti...
You nailed it on the new size length. I have the 169 cm ( I am 5’ 5” 140 lbs) but have wished it was a little longer. I ski Volkl in 173 cm and Blizzard in 172 cm and feel that is a good length for me in this style of ski. I will definitely take advantage of the ski shop employee purchase next season. Also the looking forward to the new Griffin ⛷⛷🙏🙏
I wish you guys would recommend bindings for each pair of skis you review, nonetheless awesome stuff. Hopefully you get back on the slopes asap!
Lots of guys are running tyrolia attacks (on enforcers) at the shop I work at.
Just bought 2020 100s in the 177 length. Widest ski I’ve ever been on. They cruise through anything and still rip groomers. Love these. Still hanging on to my amphibio 88xti’s tho. For those super carvy/icy days maybe.
Thanks for sharing your experience!
Would love some more info on those bindings you mentioned in this video!
Top notch channel right here.
Thanks!
Another dope review!!
Thanks David!
great review once again !...how does it compare to the Bent Chetlers? ....just skied them last week at Keystone and they were great ...super stable at speed , surprisingly nimble in the trees and moguls for 100mm....just curious on your take between the 2 ...thanks!
The Bent Chetler 100 is much more playful. The Enforcer 100 is heavier and stiffer with its two sheets of metal. It's not as nimble as the BC 100, but absolutely rips!
@@SkiEssentials thank you!
Thanks for the great review guys. How does the Nordica Enforcer 100 compare to the Salomon QST 99?
For context, I am a 5'7" 165 lbs expert skier. I had Fischer Ranger 98 for the last few seasons but destroyed unfortunately. Looking at Enforcer 100 and QST 99.
The Enforcer feels more powerful overall. More stability at speed, more vibration damping. The QST is more playful. Easier edge release in soft snow, a little quicker when you're maneuvering through trees and stuff like that, but not as much edge grip or as much power on firm snow.
Great review. I’ve been on bonafides and brahmas (187cm) for 8 years. Love them. Rail crazy lines and can throw GS carves all day. Always road aggressive. That said I’m getting old, 55, 190lbs, east coast and the Rockies. I’m looking to back off a bit but I don’t want a rocking chair. My bonafides are a bit of work now for me on short turns. Trying to ignore my ego and still have performance with a tad more casual. Any advice would be awesome.👍
Hi! I think you'd really like this new Enforcer. It's definitely more forgiving than your Bonafides, but still rips when you can to just rail high speed turns. That said, you should wait to see the new Bonafide too before you make a decision. Blizzard did a similar thing with the Bonafide, made it a little more forgiving and approachable, but it still rips. We're planning to have a review of it up in the coming weeks.
Skiessentials.com thanks a bunch for the input. If you don’t mind another question I thought the Bones were going even more carve oriented in 1021 not more playful. Am I wrong in that? I do love all of Blizzards stuff.
@@SattvaWoodworks Not really. Changes to the Bonafide for 2021 are designed to retain its carving performance, but also make them a little bit more forgiving. We'll have a full review of the Bonafide up pretty soon. It still rips, it basically just releases its edge more willingly.
Hi! Thank you for this great review.
Wondering what is the place (ski slope) where are you tasted that?
Hi Andrey! This video, and the majority of the skiing footage you see in our reviews, was shot at Stowe in Northern Vermont. Fantastic mountain, rich skiing history, really cool terrain. One of my favorite, if not my absolute favorite, places to test skis. You can do a lot on one single run.
Rad. Thinking of picking up the 2019 captis do you lads know if they're changing significantly enough, if at all, for 2021 that I should hold off?
Also, nice to see the brace off!🤘🏻
I don't have that knowledge readily available, but can probably find out in the next day or two. My instincts are it won't change, at least not significantly, but I could be wrong.
I had a blast testing the 2020 100, 104, 110 over a week ago and they all like to go fast, was blown away with their versatility and how light they felt skiing vs hanging on a chairlift.... but to me there is a night and day noticeable difference between the 100 and 104 free. The 104 free suits my lazy smeary ski style.... but now the 100 sounds more forgiving. Is the tail easier to release and smear a turn now? Also, will Nordica be updating the 110 free with the same changes found in the 100 and 104?
It'll probably be in between the current 100 and 104 as far as tail release goes.
The tail is easier to release and smear on the new 100 compared to the old 100, yes, but it's more similar to the 100 than to the 104. Does that make sense? Felt confusing as I was typing it. Overall, the new 100 is just a little less demanding, but still has the same power and vibration damping as before. The 104 makes those long drifting/smearing/slarving turns better still. As far as I know, and as far as I've been told, the 110 and 115 stay the same.
Skiessentials.com Thank you and it makes sense. I went looking for powder skis on a demo day..... I need more float as this season there’s been more pow days than normal, but kept coming back to the 104 free as my favourite. Looking forward to testing the new Volkl freeride skis in March, hoping similar to my 90eights but more floaty.
@@gregs8313 New Volkl skis are great! You'll start to see more info on them soon. We have a video we're anxiously waiting to get the green light to post.
@@SkiEssentials I saw them today at my local dealer..... without the top sheets of course... shape looks promising :)
Hi jef anb bob, I’m your follower . Thanks for your valuable reviews, I’m using Nordica 100 169 cms for 4 seasons . I’m 175 cms height 70 kgr weight and 51 years old . Whatsize for the 2021 do you recommend for me 165 or 172? Thanks!
Hi Juan! You should be just fine on the 172 cm length. The 2021 version is a little lighter in the tips and tails, so I expect you'll find it feels similar on your feet. 165 would definitely feel shorter than your current 169.
@@SkiEssentials thanks very much from colombia
Hello @Skiessentials.com How would you compare the Enforcer 100 191cm to the k2 poacher 185. I own a poacher in 185 and i have a lot of problems with it because the tail is too soft. I also felt that my poacher is too short so im looking into a longoer stiffer ski for Freeriding pow but also groomers. (ski racing background)
Hello! Enforcer is stiffer in the tail, by a significant amount. Also less tail rocker. Enforcer has better vibration damping too thanks to those 2 sheets of metal. If you don't need a twin tip, and you're looking for a stiffer, more powerful ski, you're going to absolutely love the Enforcer 100. Most skiers with race backgrounds love the Enforcer series. Precise and powerful, but also versatile and fun in soft snow.
5’9” and 180 lbs. I ski UT exclusively and am finally venturing into black diamonds. Looking for a one ski quiver until I get a dedicated off-piste powder ski. Should I opt for something like this or the 94? I’m assuming I might like having a 94 after I get my second powder pair. Thoughts?? Thanks in advance! Great review!!
Hey TJ! I replied to your other comment as well. I think the 100 is a better choice for where you live and what you ski. It's a great one ski quiver for Utah, in my opinion.
@@SkiEssentials Thank you! I'm glad you said that bc I ended up grabbing both the 100s and the 88s! They seem to charge hard so I'll be growing into them for sure! What do you recommend for a powder ski at my level and considering I'll be skiing UT exclusively?
I’m curious how the feedback and impressions have been a year into the meeting model?
I’m heavier, 5’11” and 220 lbs. I normally ski on piste on the west coast but occasional trees, at a an advanced but not expert level. Which length would you recommend, 179 or 186?
Enforcer 100 is still a ridiculously good ski, our opinions haven't really changed at all. For length, I'm leaning towards 186 mostly based off your weight and the fact that you're out west. Western trees aren't very tight, so you shouldn't have any trouble maneuvering the 186 and it will give you more stability and more float everywhere else.
Very interested in this enforcer line. Wondering what skis you would recommend for an intermediate skier looking for a one ski quiver living in Ontario skiing mostly icy hard pack conditions but who gets out to the west coast of Canada at least once per year.
The new Enforcer 94 (we'll have a review out on it tomorrow) would likely be the best bet. You get good firm snow/hard pack performance, but it'll still be fun in deeper, softer western conditions.
Enforcer 88 is one of my skis for Blue Mountain. Since you mentioned 1 ski quiver I personally would go with the 88 over the 94 for Ontario. I'm 5'9" 190 and ski the 179 - my female 5'6" partner, ex-racer, skis the 172 and loves it - but I personally find the 179 a bit softer and easier than the 172 - she also easily skis the 179 but we set her up with a lighter binding on the 172 and she prefers that overall package.
Which length to get? I'm 5'10", 205lbs, expert skier. Looking for a one-ski quiver for out west and definitely want it to be light and quick in bumps/trees? Would 179cm be best? Worried the 172cm would be too short and unstable at speed.
Hey Adam! Yeah, I would go with the 179 cm length. The 172 might feel a little unstable for your size, or at least would take away some of the confidence of the Enforcer at speed. 179 cm should still be plenty maneuverable, especially considering you're skiing out west!
Any thoughts on ideal length for a 5'10" male who is 190-195lbs? I have demo'd the 2020 Enforcer 100s in 177 and 185cm. I had a rough time on the 185 because they were too long but I really enjoyed the 177. I am thinking that 179 2021 model will be perfect. Sound like a good plan? Thanks for the great review!
For sure. 179 cm will likely be the sweet spot for you. I'm in a similar position with the Enforcer 100 and I really enjoy the new version in the 179 cm length.
im similar height and weight and ski the 179 in the Enforcer 88
Soo in 5'9" 175lb and am similarly struggling on sizing. A few years back I skied the older enforcer 100 in 169cm. For the 2021 should I go up to 179cm or the 172cm
@@Ryezn5057 I ended up buying the 179x100 2020 enforcers. I like the skis but I think I actually preferred the 177s from a year ago. Its barely a difference I felt like I had a little more control on tight turns on the 179s. I'd consider demo-ing a pair from a ski shop before jumping up 10cm from what you are used to. That's a significant jump, good luck!
@@timhersh4260 Thanks for the input. Sadly I can't demo. I've the option of the 179 or the 172cm on a great deal. I also have the option of the Enforcer 104 Free at 172cm only. Right now I feel like the 179cm Enforcer Free would likely fit me best, but really wish I could get the Enforcer Free 104 in 180cm...
So I haven’t skied in 15 years I’m still really good I’m from mammoth mountain and was on the ski team. I bought some k2 mindbender and holy cow are they wide. How are these ski in comparison to the k2. I loved downhill and super G and big cliff jumps and wind lips. If i can find a cheap nordica do i get them. Or am i just freaking out for no reason
So, I am 5'8' 220lbs and I just bought the '19 enforcer 100s in 169s. I bought them short because I wanted to ski them in bumps and tight spaces. Did I mess up by getting them too short? I have been skiing 40 plus years and ski semi aggressive now that I have gotten older.. ha ha.. please tell me that I didnt screw up... pretty please.... BTW, great reviews!!!!
BTW, I got these to replace my 177 Bonafides that I hated.. way too much work for the return
No, I don't think you necessarily got them too short. Would some skiers your size go with the 177? Yes, but the 169 cm should be supportive for your size. It's going going to make bumps and tighter terrain much easier than the 177 cm. I'd also add that if you found the (173 or 180 cm?) Bonafide too much work, the 177 Enforcer 100 likely wouldn't be much better for you. More rocker, yes, and slightly softer flexing, but a similar animal. 169 cm should be a lot of fun!
Hey Jeff, how's the shoulder recovery going?
Good! Can't ask for much more. I have full range of motion and can start strength training in about a week! Thanks for asking.
this or the bentchetler 100?
Pretty different skis to be honest! The Bent Chetler 100 is much lighter, softer flexing, and more playful. It's also a twin tip, so you can take it into the terrain park, ski switch, etc. The Enforcer 100 is far more stable at speed, more powerful, more responsive out of a turn, etc, but it's not as playful as the BC 100 by a long shot. The Enforcer 104 Free would be a closer comparison, although realistically the closest Nordica to the Bent Chetler 100 is the Soul Rider 97.
Skiessentials.com thanks
Can you comment on the difference between this ski and K2 Mindbender 99? Rented the Enforcer 100, super impressed with its ability to carve and drive through crud and variable conditions however it was hard to ditch speed or maneuver at slower speed, how would this ski compare to Mindbender 99? Thanks.
Overall, I find the Enforcer 100 and the Mindbender 99 to be very similar skis. They're both stable and relatively powerful, but their shape gives them good versatility too. If anything, I actually think the Enforcer 100 has slightly easier edge release than the Mindbender 99, although that's a really close comparison. So, if you're looking for more maneuverability at slower speeds, MB 99 probably isn't the way to go. Enforcer 104 is an interesting ski to consider. Very similar feel to the 100, but much more tail rocker. Something to think about at least. In general, it sounds like you're going to prefer a ski with a little more rise in the tail to help with the maneuverability/speed dumps.
When will you have the 2021 100s in stock to sell?
Not speaking for ski essentials but probably as soon as a month, at least that's what I've heard from shops.
Very soon! Within a week or two I believe.
Any chance to test one of the Santa Anas 2021 as well???
We tested the entire Santa Ana line, yes! We'll be rolling out those reviews in the weeks and months to come.
.....that would be awesome :-)
@@SkiEssentials I'm anxiously awaiting for any reviews of the SA 104🙏 I currently ski on 2017 Volkl Aura and 2019 SA 93, demoed the 2020 SA 110 and Enforcer 104. Loved the Enforcer 104 but a bit too long for me in 172cm since I'm 5'3 and 115 lbs. Really curious how the one sheet of metal in the 2021 SA 104 compared to two sheets in the Enforcer!
How much powder would be too much for the enforcer 100, could I take it into a foot or two of fresh snow?
A foot? Sure. Two feet? Maybe getting a little much. Kind of depends on skiing style. We've skied untracked, deep snow on the Enforcer 100. If you have good technique, it works fine, but it requires unweighting the tail to get it to maneuver as it does start to sink quite a bit. Intermediates or less aggressive skiers may find it catchy in really deep snow.
@@SkiEssentials I have the feeling that those bindings are mounted way towards the front. That makes the ski more maneuverable but it floats less. I have skied chest deep snow with a Rossy Sky 7 in 1,80 and enjoyed it, I do not see why this ski should be less capable having a bigger waist and 5cm extra long...
Put the new Baron PT on them and let the fun begin!
Cheers from Spain.
@@jazzman_10 It's heavier, stiffer and the tip shape is quite a bit different than the Sky 7. Bindings were right on the recommended line, I don't think you'd want to go further back than that on the Enforcer, at least I wouldn't want to.
@@SkiEssentials 🤔 Interesting... That recommended point seems more for a twin tip than a freeride ski... but it is too heavy for a park ski, I do not see the point... Now that nobody can hear us, what would be your pick for an everyday ski with touring bindings, beefy enough for an advanced/expert but light enough for hiking when needed?
@@jazzman_10 There's not much tail rise in the Enforcer 100, it's not really intended as a park ski at all.
That's a tough question and to be perfectly honest, there are a ton of skis that fit that role. If I was choosing something for myself for that application, it might be the Ranger 102 FR from Fischer, but that said, I don't own that ski, and I could, so I don't even know if that's a fair answer, I just think it's a good one-ski-quiver for someone looking to check all those boxes... and I happen to like twin tips, which is definitely influencing my opinion.
Will you guys review j skis master blaster?
We've had a lot of requests for J Skis reviews and will likely try to put together something this winter.
How much of a difference do width of skis make in powdery conidtions? I've been skiing on a set of 72mm skis in all conditions for the last several years but now that I'm out of college I wanna upgrade my setup. I'm leaning towards a set of e88's, but would it be wiser to go up to e94s to make for a more versatile ski? I'm not at the point where I can justify getting 2 pairs (narrow and wide) unless it makes an absolutely night and day difference
Width makes a pretty big difference in deep snow, but you're also making sacrifices for firm snow as you go wider and wider. In general, a mid-90 mm waist ski is going to be pretty darn versatile for both firm and soft conditions. If you're looking for some powder performance, I'd go with the mid-90 range personally.
The 2 guys at the 8 minute mark how tall are they and what size skis are they on?
Marcus (green jacket) is 6'5", Joe I would guess is about 6'1" maybe 6'2". They were both skiing the 186 cm length.
@@SkiEssentials I'm 5'8", consider myself an expert skier. What would you recommend for size on the Enforcer 100?
@@QuikTipz I'd probably go with the 172 cm length in this new Enforcer. In the previous version, you'd fall between the 169 and 177, but 172 should be perfect.
@@QuikTipz 172 works great for me at 5'7" 160 lbs. In Killington/Pico we have a lot of bumps and tight, steep trees so 172 works well with my Enforcer 88's and my Blizzard Peacemakers 104 underfoot. 179 would feel a bit long for our terrain/conditions.
You have a working arm again?! yay :)
Kinda! Yay!!
How is this compared to Head Kore 99?
Feels smoother than the Kore in my opinion. The sheets of metal give it better vibration damping, although it's heavier because of that. The Kore skis have a very unique feel. They're relatively light and relatively stiff, which makes them feel super responsive, but can be twitchy too.
The kid in the Grey jacket is a pretty bad skier. You should find a tester that actually knows how to ski.
You mean one of the Nordica sponsored athletes? He's pretty good. Skied with him yesterday and was reminded of just how good he is.