Top 10 DEADLIEST Trucks Of This Century
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 14 окт 2024
- These are the 10 trucks with defaults that have been brought to the market and caused several deathly incidents.
Truck 1: Freightliner Cascadia
"Starting our list is the Freightliner Cascadia, a staple on many highways across the country. Known for its reliability and favored by many trucking companies, the Cascadia, however, has not been without its challenges. One of the more critical issues has been with its braking system. In trucks, having a dependable brake system is not just a necessity; it's a lifeline.
Let's take a moment to delve into a specific incident that underscores the importance of these safety features. It was a foggy morning on Interstate 40, a busy stretch that sees thousands of trucks every day. John, a seasoned truck driver, was behind the wheel of a 2010 Freightliner Cascadia. As he descended a gentle slope, traffic ahead slowed unexpectedly due to a sudden roadblock. Instinctively, John hit the brakes, but instead of a smooth response, he felt a jarring shudder. The brakes failed to engage fully, leaving him hurtling forward with minimal control.
The truck skidded for several hundred feet, narrowly missing a family sedan before jackknifing and finally coming to a halt across several lanes. Miraculously, no one was injured, but the incident left a lasting impact on all involved and highlighted a critical flaw in the Cascadia’s design at the time.
Following several such incidents, Daimler Trucks North America, the manufacturer of Freightliner trucks, initiated a series of comprehensive upgrades focusing on the braking systems of newer models. These upgrades included enhancements to the brake calipers and the introduction of advanced ABS systems that provide better control during sudden stops. Additionally, the company launched training programs for drivers on handling emergency stops more effectively, aiming to prevent such frightening scenarios.
Today's Cascadia models feature these improved safety measures, reflecting the lessons learned from past experiences and showing Daimler's commitment to road safety. But the story of John's near-miss remains a stark reminder of the continuous need for vigilance and improvement in truck safety technologies."
Truck 2: Volvo VNL Series
"Next on our list is the Volvo VNL Series. Volvo is often hailed as a paragon of vehicle safety, which makes it all the more critical to address the times when even the safest brands falter. Despite Volvo's strong safety reputation, the VNL Series has faced its own challenges, particularly with visibility and braking-two crucial components that ensure a trucker’s and the public's safety on the roads.
Let us recount a harrowing incident that occurred one winter night in 2015, involving a Volvo VNL. On a winding section of Route 7, Michael, an experienced truck driver, was navigating through a particularly notorious stretch known for its poor lighting and sudden curves. The truck was a Volvo VNL 670 model, which, unknown to Michael, had an undiagnosed braking system flaw-a latent defect waiting for the worst moment to reveal itself.
As Michael approached a sharp bend, a compact car unexpectedly pulled out from a side road. Reacting swiftly, Michael attempted to brake, but the response was fatally sluggish. The brake's delayed engagement and the truck's bulk, coupled with poor visibility due to the truck’s design around the A-pillars, made it impossible to maneuver in time. The truck collided with the smaller vehicle, resulting in a tragic accident that claimed the lives of two passengers in the car.
This devastating event prompted a rigorous investigation, which highlighted the VNL's braking and visibility issues as contributing factors to the accident. In response, Volvo took immediate steps to address these concerns. The company initiated a recall to fix the braking systems in affected models and introduced new design enhancements to improve driver visibility around the truck's pillars. These updates were part of a broader effort by Volvo to enhance the overall safety features of the VNL Series, ensuring that such a tragedy would not occur again.
Today, the newer models of the Volvo VNL Series boast improved braking systems and redesigned cabins for better visibility, demonstrating Volvo’s commitment to safety and continuous improvement. Yet, the story of that fateful night remains a poignant reminder of why constant vigilance and proactive safety measures are indispensable in the trucking industry."
Truck 3: Kenworth T680
"The Kenworth T680, a model celebrated for its fuel efficiency and driver comfort, stands as a testament to modern truck engineering. However, even the best designs can encounter unexpected challenges, especially under extreme conditions. The T680, in particular, has faced its share of scrutiny over issues related to vehicle control and stability.
#trucking #truck #truckdriver
As a professional driver for over 30 years the reliance on computers and safety features has allowed for "steering wheel holders" to drive things they never should. Automatic transmissions are a huge culprit. Brains and common sense are the best safety measures, not technology. Sadly, both brains and common sense are in short supply nowadays.
Modern trucks just need more computers to monitor the computers! 😂
Agreed they are junk
Womp womp
Technology can help the Driver. But the driver must be able to drive the truck and not compledaly trust the tech. Thats what happends on many modern vehicles. The People let the Car and the technique drive and dont drive the car itself.
And even if you have many expeirance in your driving skills, you can still kmisstakes...and the tech too. And this must all driver know...every time. Misstakes happends...in all ways. So drive careful.
And this is why I like older trucks better they're way more simple
None of these trucks are even deadly
For years my ABS was my right foot
Lol
All this proves is that ALL drivers need to pay attention and these so-called safety and automation devices are really a safety hazard
In real world terms any semi or anything built after 2007 is trash down to house appliances .
As a mechanic we need to go back to pre 2007 quality!!!!!
I honestly wasn’t expecting him to just get right into the video😂😂
That's why I still love ❤ to drive my 2007, 379 Peterbuilt with a 3406 CAT Engine , 550 HP and a 18 speed manual transmission, alot bs with the new trucks, they build trucks this days to keep the mechanics busy in the dealers.😂
Because there is always something wrong with alot wires and software issues.
Ever noticed on the grille and hood badges on your truck there is no U in Peterbilt?
😂 peterbuilt is not building 379s anymore, you need to be a real professional to drive one of those, I have a 389 too😂
The brand "MAN" is NOT spoken as one word! It is like "M.A.N.", abbreviation for "Maschinenfabrik Augsburg Nürnberg", a company in Germany.
ThankYouVeryMuch (man).
Automatic traction control devices also seem to be a problem from the videos I've watched. I too am I old school driver with 32 years and a couple of times I got put into other trucks when I'd fill in for different routes. What are my big beefs with Mack at the time, with an automatic transmission and I normally didn't drive automatic transmission is if it sensed a wheel spinning it would apply the brakes to that wheel. At the same time the computer would take over and decelerate the engine. It was a no-win situation. And like other drivers noted ABS was my foot and a very light application of the engine brake.
Traction control has gotten me stuck more than once, if I see anything on the road the traction control button is hit, and the truck will still try to limit power
Cars hit level : 📈
Trucks hit levels : 📈📈📈📈📈📈📈📈📈📈📈📈📈📈📈📈📈📈📈📈📈📈📈📈📈📈📈📈📈📈📈📈📈📈📈📈📈📈📈📈📈📈📈📈📈📈📈📈📈📈📈📈📈📈📈📈📈📈📈📈📈📈📈📈📈📈📈📈📈📈📈📈📈
"Seasoned" drivers. Did that include spices or just some salt and pepper? Some basil?
Oh and one more thing, four are at fault in over ninety percent of car vs big truck accidents,care to talk about that Mr.
0:04 What year?
The thumbnail photo 💀
Deadly American trucks in the Philippines was the International 9600 & 9800 COE due to lack of maintenance of operators as usual
Whomever pieced this together didn't look at the trucks shown and what truck he talking about.
All computers in trucks are the problem. Trucks where simple 40 years ago and common sense was common back then. After 46 years and over 3 million miles in Canada and America was enough for me. Trucks of today sound nice but are a nightmare to operate. Computer problems are common just like putting fuel in it. The drawing board is much different then the mountain pass is. Automatic trucks are another problem for the road,looks great on the drawing board.
Before you do any more articles with pictures please get your vehicles in order
Showing s Cascadia? Show a driver driving one not a backseat view from a car.
A Volvo Vnl keep it the same not switching to a cabover
And the cabover is the European (and nearly wordwide sold) FH-series.
In Europe available with up to 770bhp!
As you can see....hes talking about new trucks. None old!!! Thats why i like old machinery
Technology helps, but if a person lacks intelligence, it doesn't matter whether the truck has advanced technology or not. If people don't understand the technology, we shouldn't blame the technology itself. Lastly, truck driving doesn't require a bachelor's degree, and yes, it is a low-education labor field. Driving schools don't teach how to drive safely; they just teach how to pass the exam. However, if a person doesn't educate themselves to become a professional driver instead of just a steering wheel holder, there will always be a demand for autonomous trucks.
They have a truck that has reliability performance and everything else that a truck needs because of the wait they carry and the truck itself I'm surprised that the company that manufactures them don't consider this whatsoever and considering when it comes to rain sleet or snow that doing a special speed that is where you're doing 65 or 70 miles an hour to try 55 or less it would be an awesome thing if you would have stuck these trucks to a test first before you actually put them out for sale at dealers or whatever the reason may be it's best to be safe than sorry
1) There's not enough details. You're asking us to assume your own conclusions with insufficient information.
2) Where are the NTSB reports that we could use to try to answer some of these extra questions?
3) When techno nerds, including those at Boeing, try to wrest control away from the boots and drivers on the ground (and in the skies), castrophe is going to inevitably ensue.
Freightliner Cascadia: a) We don't know if "John" was overusing the brakes due to being "blessed" with an automated/automatic transmission. b) We don't know if "John" wasn't paying enough attention to the air pressure gauges. c) Was he worrying about traffic while overspeeding for conditions because his ELD clock was running low?
Kenworth T680: a) Did "Tom" think to stop at the top of the hill before the descent? And b) chain up his drives and c) disable stability control, d) traction control, e) switch to manual transmission, and f) ABS? Yes, that is recommended for extreme conditions to retain maximum control.
Peterbilt 579: The illustration is the Peterbilt 3XX series and not the slope-nosed newer model 5XX series.
International ProStar: a) Was there a sufficient dashboard gauge package (like in the Peterbilt 389 or Kenworth W9000) to track the engine temperature and coolant level(s)? I suspect not. b) They've replaced those dials with sudden "idiot lights." c) What was the engine brand and model (ie Cummins, Paccar, Detroit Diesel, etc)?
Mack Titan: a) Did "Frank" remember to preselect a manual gear one speed lower than would be used to ascend the same grade? b) Did "Frank" scale the payload to confirm he wasn't overweight? c) Was "Frank" overusing his brakes to the point where the drums had expanded away from the shoes due to extreme heat?
Western Star 5700XE: a) The traction control is to be disabled during extreme weather. b) The central theme continues to be that extreme conditions means all control has to be handed back to the driver. No exceptions. c) What do aerodynamics have to do with slow-speed maneuvering? I suspect very little if any.
Man TGX: a) Did "Henrik" remember to switch to manual transmission? b) Did "Henrik" remember to select a gear one lower than he would use for the equivalent ascent? c) Did "Henrik" remember to use jake brakes and retarding (if available) to control his speed? d) Did "Henrik" remember to disable stability and traction control until he was on level ground? e) Did "Henrik" remember to preselect and stay in a sufficiently low gear *before* starting the descent? f) What was the brand and model of the drivetrain? Was it Paccar? BTW, Switzerland has vehicles driving on the right side, not the left side. That's only in GB and Ireland.
Scania R-Series, Mercedes-Benz Actros: a) How do you think drivers will respond other than to completely disable the ECS, VCS, TCS, ABS, etc during their pre-trip process from now on? b) Does the training program also include the overwhelming recommendation to just disable the hot software mess(es)? The techno-nerds had their chance. And they blew it. _You had one job. . ._
AI art is weird....
Nah fr,especially the first one💀
You guys are all capping
WHAT THE
Slippry road conditions heavy rain and traction control caused the accident lol I drove for years without traction control my suggestion slow down
Cheap plastic trucks too focused on technology and aerodynamics with too many sensors and add the DPF system " start making real trucks again!!!!
In other words the driver was following to close and was traveling too fast. Too much speed and following too close.
Every truck has there problems and cars
T680 not T six hundred eighty
It's ai
So your talking about the VNL but showing pictures of the FH 😂😂😂
So it comes down to stupid engineers and electronics don't forget about stupid drivers that shouldn't have a CDL in the first place and no matter what it all gets blamed on the driver
Clickbait thumbnail
And scania
Looks to me like it has to do with all that computer cr*p on trucks and just all vehicles across the board maybe go back to when a person could work on vehicles and trucks and you know just what's wrong and can be fix n not analyzed keep the computers in the office and the vehicles and trucks on the road and these kind of deaths don't happen.
What you fail to tell everyone after an accident the first thing they do is rake that driver over the coals before their little lap top says different meanwhile that driver has lost his job and having a hard time finding another plus he lives with what has happened and questions himself. There are more factors at play than a dam computer glitch keep the computer in the office and save the headache.
Drivers were pushing freight before you geeks added that cr*p to trucks and didn't seem to cause this stuff
I’m reporting this video
Give it time and Tesla will take slot number one!
None of these trucks are deadly
Another (non)fact filled video by someone who knows nothing about his subject!
Am sure this is AI ChatGPT generated video. Even the voice is not real, but one from ChatGPT.
This video is so cringe
Trucking company must find other methods to reduce the cost of shipping , Most definitely, remove the if its LATE its FREE, l just retired and live in the ice🧊E north in no RUSH, drives are requested to REDUCE speed with winterTIRES .