I have this mount in its traditional configuration. I think of it as a mount that can handle up to 15 pounds, appropriately balanced side to side. What size Oberwerk binoculars does this setup handle? Is there a maximum less than 127 mm? Great video.
This is far from nice , proprietary mount , with a bubble level , im sure its correct , counterweights , give me a break , there are motors around these days that hold big scopes for astrophotography that are that big , absolute wreck of a design , jesus chirst i could make it better . Im sure you are selling those a lot , and im also sure you put in the real nice zoomed in EPs , when only refractors can use big EPs like 40mm for wide field of view , i mean i could make this a ton better . Probably cheaper as well .
@@plinthley as far as mounts go having a proprietary mount is rubbish , for us users , imagine all telescope mounts having proprietary mount , you like that , i don't and there is no need for me to invent hot water its already on the market , 2nd the motor , even big scopes today do not use counterweights , look it up , if it was cheap i would overlook it , but its not , so its obsolete overpriced mount , mounted incorrectly because tripod is made bad . And as far as Binos go , be my guest use Zoom EP , i don't use them , they lack micro contrast and sharpness again having it without any EP would be better , then user can chose to buy overpriced Zooms or get his own good EPs . This is all simple . If you don't get it and you have money , no problem i will design you a better system . No problem m8.
@@zpc751 or binoculars and refractors or with a sensitive camera and lens , or you can brake it up make some fire wood out of it .Who cares , i don't see it selling , and it could have been sold , if it was any good .
Very Cool. High Tech at its finest
I have this mount in its traditional configuration. I think of it as a mount that can handle up to 15 pounds, appropriately balanced side to side. What size Oberwerk binoculars does this setup handle? Is there a maximum less than 127 mm? Great video.
Thanks much i have that mount but orion bt 100 binoc.. gives me ideas
What a beautiful binoculars. Is it 100mm?
Great Buddy thanks
Very nice!
Are the optics on all your binoculars multicoated, or fully multicoated?
0ленлере ₽ехмет
This is far from nice , proprietary mount , with a bubble level , im sure its correct , counterweights , give me a break , there are motors around these days that hold big scopes for astrophotography that are that big , absolute wreck of a design , jesus chirst i could make it better . Im sure you are selling those a lot , and im also sure you put in the real nice zoomed in EPs , when only refractors can use big EPs like 40mm for wide field of view , i mean i could make this a ton better . Probably cheaper as well .
Show us what you've accomplished. Take all the time you need.
@@plinthley as far as mounts go having a proprietary mount is rubbish , for us users , imagine all telescope mounts having proprietary mount , you like that , i don't and there is no need for me to invent hot water its already on the market , 2nd the motor , even big scopes today do not use counterweights , look it up , if it was cheap i would overlook it , but its not , so its obsolete overpriced mount , mounted incorrectly because tripod is made bad . And as far as Binos go , be my guest use Zoom EP , i don't use them , they lack micro contrast and sharpness again having it without any EP would be better , then user can chose to buy overpriced Zooms or get his own good EPs .
This is all simple . If you don't get it and you have money , no problem i will design you a better system . No problem m8.
and you can use this mount with a Sc or a mak for planets viewing so you have complite equipement
@@zpc751 or binoculars and refractors or with a sensitive camera and lens , or you can brake it up make some fire wood out of it .Who cares , i don't see it selling , and it could have been sold , if it was any good .