I have three 122mk3, one Zx9, one aïwa 009 and one very good Teac V970x....Each of these decks sound wonderful but in terms of reliability, heavy use and repair, the 122mk3 is the top of these deck and for say that, i know the mechanics of all these deck very well. The Tascam is built to last and easy to repair and calibrate and this philosphy is similar for the Teac. It's just my opinion because i can compare them !
@@olegvayzmin5253 Я думаю что будет ровня с ZX-7 более менее , это на любителя как говорится , нужно записать на эту же кассету тот же трак , в том то и дело что выбрать между ними , дорогими топовыми аппаратами , как по мне, трудно , у них у всех есть свои достоинства , все по своему неповторимы , опять главное чтобы они Все были в топ состоянии , тогда можно сравнивать . Даже дешёвая простая дека отстроенная Метал кассету будет играть , супер тоже , Метал кассета это сам по себе музыкальный инструмент .
Nakamichi is not pro, studio not used NAK. It's too cheaply made with delicate parts, and not neutral sound. Revox/ Studer is much better than Nakamichi
Nakamichi never produced ProStudio decks , tape never ment to be used for Studio recordings , some companies like Tascam , Yamaha , they produced multitrack Studio decks ,4 track and 8 track , but they nothing to do with consumer segment , those tapes only playable on those decks , will not play on normal decks . Nakamichi Decks are Very Best ever made , even their two head decks will beat soundwise 90% of others . Needs to look very hard to find deck or decks which will come to Nakamichi level . Cheaply made ?? Who said ? Most expensive decks . Delicate ? You mean plastic parts in transport ? There were reasons for those parts to be this way , 45 +- years old decks , every deck will have age related issues . Plastic parts can be upgraged to metal , just need to know right people , everything can be elevated/ replaced , mech. & electronics . Naks do not obey IEC standards , every deck has own way of sounding , and Nakamichi are among best Recorders & Players Studer /Revox , never had those , cannot judge ) I am sure they are nice machines . Have opinion of people I know they had Revox and Studer but kept Nakamichis Needs objectivity here , Higher price = Better product . Mercedes is expensive because more in it
@@kravchuk007 You're wrong. Cassette decks were used in studio's for demo purposes, both from prospective artists and retail cassette producers. The point is Nakamichi deck's are dog's ass. Their recordings sound crap on other decks. The circuitry artificially boosts eq ranges to fool listeners. Nakamichi not reliable, incompatable, and inaccurate.
@@fickfehler3866 They are not ass ) All other facts you listed are known to me . Please , dont read threads on internet , with someone elses opinoins )) About Nakamichis )) Demo purposes ? ... any deck can be used )) www.theaudioarchive.com/TAA_Tape_Cassette.htm look which decks are used , and why
I have three 122mk3, one Zx9, one aïwa 009 and one very good Teac V970x....Each of these decks sound wonderful but in terms of reliability, heavy use and repair, the 122mk3 is the top of these deck and for say that, i know the mechanics of all these deck very well. The Tascam is built to last and easy to repair and calibrate and this philosphy is similar for the Teac. It's just my opinion because i can compare them !
Hi, I use this Tape since years and yes.... no Dolby needed. 👍 Have a great day!!!
Шикардос!!!
Да Дека достойная)
@@kravchuk007 по сравнению с ZX-7 какое ваше мнение
@@olegvayzmin5253 Я думаю что будет ровня с ZX-7 более менее , это на любителя как говорится , нужно записать на эту же кассету тот же трак , в том то и дело что выбрать между ними , дорогими топовыми аппаратами , как по мне, трудно , у них у всех есть свои достоинства , все по своему неповторимы , опять главное чтобы они Все были в топ состоянии , тогда можно сравнивать . Даже дешёвая простая дека отстроенная Метал кассету будет играть , супер тоже , Метал кассета это сам по себе музыкальный инструмент .
@@kravchuk007 Спасибо
@@olegvayzmin5253 😀
Nakamichi is not pro, studio not used NAK. It's too cheaply made with delicate parts, and not neutral sound. Revox/ Studer is much better than Nakamichi
Nakamichi never produced ProStudio decks , tape never ment to be used for Studio recordings , some companies like Tascam , Yamaha , they produced multitrack Studio decks ,4 track and 8 track , but they nothing to do with consumer segment , those tapes only playable on those decks , will not play on normal decks .
Nakamichi Decks are Very Best ever made , even their two head decks will beat soundwise 90% of others .
Needs to look very hard to find deck or decks which will come to Nakamichi level .
Cheaply made ?? Who said ? Most expensive decks . Delicate ? You mean plastic parts in transport ? There were reasons for those parts to be this way , 45 +- years old decks , every deck will have age related issues .
Plastic parts can be upgraged to metal , just need to know right people , everything can be elevated/ replaced , mech. & electronics . Naks do not obey IEC standards , every deck has own way of sounding , and Nakamichi are among best Recorders & Players
Studer /Revox , never had those , cannot judge ) I am sure they are nice machines .
Have opinion of people I know they had Revox and Studer but kept Nakamichis
Needs objectivity here , Higher price = Better product .
Mercedes is expensive because more in it
@@kravchuk007 You're wrong. Cassette decks were used in studio's for demo purposes, both from prospective artists and retail cassette producers. The point is Nakamichi deck's are dog's ass. Their recordings sound crap on other decks. The circuitry artificially boosts eq ranges to fool listeners. Nakamichi not reliable, incompatable, and inaccurate.
@@fickfehler3866 They are not ass ) All other facts you listed are known to me .
Please , dont read threads on internet , with someone elses opinoins )) About Nakamichis )) Demo purposes ? ... any deck can be used )) www.theaudioarchive.com/TAA_Tape_Cassette.htm look which decks are used , and why