Immigration rhetoric and border policy in the 2024 election
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 6 сен 2024
- ABC News' Gio Benitez breaks down key election issues, including immigration and border policy, with consultant Carmen Pelaez, and president of Latino partnership Alfonso Aquilar.
Subscribe to ABC News on RUclips: abcnews.visitl...
ABC News Digital is your daily source of breaking national and world news, exclusive interviews and 24/7 live streaming coverage.
Download the ABC News app for the latest headlines and alerts: abcnews.go.com...
Watch 24/7 coverage of breaking news and live events on ABC News Live: • LIVE: Latest News Head...
Watch full episodes of World News Tonight with David Muir here: • ABC World News Tonight...
Read ABC News reports online: abcnews.go.com
ABC News is the home to the #1 evening newscast “World News Tonight” with David Muir, “Good Morning America,” “20/20,” “Nightline,” “This Week” with George Stephanopoulos, “ABC News Live Prime” with Linsey Davis, plus the daily news podcast “Start Here.”
Connect with ABC News on social media:
Facebook: / abcnews
Instagram: / abcnews
TikTok: / abcnews
X: / abc
Threads: www.threads.ne...
LinkedIn: / abcnews
It is not only a threat to national security but supporting all the people coming here illegally is draining our economy.
Enriching the terrorist cartels and then illegally crossing our border, and then we have to pay for them when they arrive???
Not really most of them work and pay taxes with out getting anything back meanwhile UKRAINIAN government it’s draining USA economic with they war the difference is skin color
Not like all the stupid wars we’ve been involved
@@ab8588to protect our country. Instead of having illegals come leach on handouts coming here bringing their crimes and disease
Your economy is drained because your politics fund wars!
Import third world, become third world
@@Nclake5485 since the Iraq war
Close the freaking border
The problem is asylum law, which states anyone in US soil can wait in the US while their case is heard.
Close the border how will u get goods into the usa idiot lol guess u havent thought about feeding America
@@user-jc4pw3pl9u 🤡
@@lettucesalad3560then change asylum law…
@@elizabethe6459 Trump told the GOP controlled house not to change immigration law until 2025, so he had an issue to run on. Trump had 2 years 2017-2018 with a GOP controlled congress, and he didn't fix immigration law either. He's pro-immigration, he's just a liar.
Cant wait until November when 7 million are deported and i can get my job and my housing back, and my groceries and utilities go down back
Trump won't be sworn in until January 20, 2024
The massive Deportation will never happen Donald Trump directed for 4 years and deported less people than Barack Obama every thing is Scicologic to manipulate people you need to find a common enemy it could be immigrant's ,Russia or China and the sad thing is that people like you believe that, our country is being destroyed by the corporation like wallmart for example they pay five billion dollars of taxes and receive seven billion dollars from the government, that means they take your taxes and my taxes and give it to the rich people, democrats and republicans are the same thing there is no hope for us the system is made to make the pour more pour and rich more rich dont beleive in fantasies, you think the strongest army in the world can't stop a pregnant woman walking with 3 kids in the dessert and deport her you have to be a ignorant to believe that
😂😂😂😂 prices will NEVER go back down
@@bertog1217 Some people don't understand how the economy works
@@bertog1217 are you an economist? It's one Texas town that deported thousands and guess what housing prices groceries went down because landlord had no one to rent to and stores had less customers so they lowered prices
If you're not here legally then you need to leave. Now is a perfect time to apply at ICE if you need a job.
Yes you can apply
@@ab8588 I applied at usajobs.gov, and have received a follow-up to start the process. I advise all combat MOS veterans to do the same... We are taking this country back over.
A nations economy cannot support 10 to 20 million more people in just a few years!!!
Then butt out of Venezuela
@@ab8588be specific how many American citizen families are butting into s hole Venezuela?
Imagine thinking having an open border is virtuous. Hilarious.
It’s not open
@@ab8588 Lol not anymore. Biden got shamed into closing it 🤣🤣🤣
@@RealMTBAddict it was never open 🤡
@@ab8588you consider it closed?
@@ab8588 found the border crasher.
Advice Of The Day: Question 🙋♂️ why would I want to support or vote 🗳️ for someone who doesn’t care about America 🇺🇸? I feel that @POTUS Sleepy 😴 Joe doesn’t care about America 🇺🇸, that’s someone I can’t get behind. We need a leader who actually cares about America 🇺🇸.
Rhetoric? How about the truth about illegals?
About how entitled arrogant and violent they get.
Tell the truth!
They can always contribute 7 trillion to the country they came from
"The only problem is with my brain"
-Joe Biden
Joe "What border". Biden
@@charlesritter6640 USA= what border in Iraq ?
Deporter Supporter
The majority of Americans think that the people that paid money to the drug cartels and then illegally crossed our border should be deported yes of course
Definitely not desperate for work!
The was joke! How ever HR2 is a good bill !, it sits on Shumers desk!!!!!!
If the want to come the need to come legally. Don’t come here draining our resources from Americans.
Deoportion nation
They’re getting 13k food stamps and 4k monthly cash aid.
Like WTF!!!
Open your eyes
When he starts deporting how do you escape? By carrying papers?
If you can't speak a lick of English and your Spanish is spot on, that a good indicator.
Trump 2024
We just bought a house in Temecula. Cost us 8years of savings. My kids are still waiting for school because they’re so backed up on refugee children which have higher priority than legal citizens.
Just close the border!!!
Is this woman the sequel to the movie Pinocchio? Just asking.
This is a whole nother ball game
Wait, didn't Mexico give us money to build a wall?
They saved us billions during remain in Mexico.
@@stephanieanderson1924 How much did we save when Maga Cult voted against immigration reform?
@johnpaulwebb3440 biden literally created this problem
I live in Estado de Mexico. The current border policy is insane. We are basically being treated like a highway. Migrants have filled our jungles in Chiapas with garbage. They live in tent cities in CDMX. We have people living on the sidewalks of Tijuana. Worst of all, the trade of contraband is through the roof. It is SO dangerous, both for Mexico and America. And these people aren’t even poor! They’re middle class office workers from Venezuela who were lied to by coyotes and told they’d be given free housing and money in America. If you don’t believe me, look it up! Watch Mexican news on the migrant crisis, or RUclipsrs who follow the caravans. My husband is Morena party, far left, basically a socialist, and he’s hoping Trump is reelected.
@@HeyCutie90 The U.S. is not responsible for securing Mexico's southern boarder or coyotes. The part that a vast majority of American people don't understand is that most of the immigrants are from central America. It would be financially cheaper for both Mexico and U.S. to secure Mexico's southern border. Did Trump build the wall, no it's all political theatrics. When and if Trump attempt the so-called 'Mass Deportation' where are they going to be sent. The U.S. has no rights to tell other countries who that should or should not take back.
0:10 / 0:43
'The power of Trump and his allies’: Senate GOP poised to block border bill
They do
"Former President Trump told his supporters during a rally in Nevada that he is fine with being blamed for tanking the bipartisan border bill currently negotiated in the Senate.
Because it’s a garbage bill!
No
Without making the legal immigration smoother and much flexible. No border control will help this issue. You can't stop illegal immigrants if you can't make legal migration easier. People will choose the cheapest and easiest way to enter here. Unfortunately which is the illegal one. I'm legal immigrants we know how difficult and lengthy is the legal process.
So they’ll choose to break the law because it’s easier and cheaper? Enriching the cartels? That’s bs bro no body in America agrees with an open border
You can stop them and not make it easier for legal immigration. Yes you absolutely can
Put a moratorium on all immigration for 5 years
So how are there millions of legal immigrants if it’s “impossible” to legally immigrate? Your argument makes ZERO logical sense. No, yall want to allow millions upon millions of people with no cap on the amount of people coming here.
"Former President Trump told his supporters during a rally in Nevada that he is fine with being blamed for tanking the bipartisan border bill currently negotiated in the Senate. .."
Because it was a garage bill
She's speaking the truth
She's an insult to Latinas
L
That Republican did not respond at all on how Democrats tried to work with them with a bill to fix the border.
Because the bill sucks. 5000 asylum per day 😂
It’s like if you want to fix speeding. Raise the speed 😂
@@Heccordero2 democrats literally opened the border
@@leedex Read the actual Bill The Border Security and Enforcement Act of 2023 would significantly limit asylum in the U.S.
H.R. 2640 would restrict both access to and eligibility for asylum. In particular, the bill would:
Raise the initial screening standard so that a noncitizen would have to prove they were “more likely than not” to ultimately qualify for asylum in order to continue pursuing their protection claim and not be quickly removed from the U.S.;
Ban the vast majority of asylum seekers from requesting protection at a U.S. border if they traveled through a third country en route to the U.S. and were not denied asylum there;
Generally restrict asylum claims to only those migrants who arrive in the U.S. at an official port of entry;
Add exclusions to asylum eligibility, including by enacting restrictions against those who unlawfully received a federal public benefit or could reasonably avoid persecution by relocating to a safer area within their country of origin;
Deny employment authorization if an asylum seeker entered or tried to enter the U.S. at a place other than a port of entry;
Impose a fee of not less than $50 to apply for asylum, which might make it harder to afford to make a protection claim;
Narrow who qualifies for asylum based on their political opinion or membership in a particular social group, in ways that would curtail protection claims by generally excluding cases related to interpersonal violence, gang-related activity, or crime;
Allow the DHS Secretary to indefinitely suspend access to a land or maritime border for migrants who enter without admission or parole, misrepresent themselves to enter, or do not have valid documentation to enter, if doing so would help achieve “operational control;”
Require the DHS Secretary to expand detention capacity, including by potentially reopening detention facilities that have been closed or whose use has been altered during the Biden administration;
Limit release from detention for asylum seekers with positive credible fear determinations, meaning they could likely remain in immigration detention for the duration of their asylum adjudication process, which in some cases can take multiple years;
Expand the use of programs modeled after MPP, so that migrants were returned to Mexico or Canada pending their removal proceedings or reviews; and
Make other changes to current asylum procedures.
@@Nclake5485Read the Bill Republicans refused to pass that's why this Republican talking didn't answer the question. The Border Security and Enforcement Act of 2023 would significantly limit asylum in the U.S.
H.R. 2640 would restrict both access to and eligibility for asylum. In particular, the bill would:
Raise the initial screening standard so that a noncitizen would have to prove they were “more likely than not” to ultimately qualify for asylum in order to continue pursuing their protection claim and not be quickly removed from the U.S.;
Ban the vast majority of asylum seekers from requesting protection at a U.S. border if they traveled through a third country en route to the U.S. and were not denied asylum there;
Generally restrict asylum claims to only those migrants who arrive in the U.S. at an official port of entry;
Add exclusions to asylum eligibility, including by enacting restrictions against those who unlawfully received a federal public benefit or could reasonably avoid persecution by relocating to a safer area within their country of origin;
Deny employment authorization if an asylum seeker entered or tried to enter the U.S. at a place other than a port of entry;
Impose a fee of not less than $50 to apply for asylum, which might make it harder to afford to make a protection claim;
Narrow who qualifies for asylum based on their political opinion or membership in a particular social group, in ways that would curtail protection claims by generally excluding cases related to interpersonal violence, gang-related activity, or crime;
Allow the DHS Secretary to indefinitely suspend access to a land or maritime border for migrants who enter without admission or parole, misrepresent themselves to enter, or do not have valid documentation to enter, if doing so would help achieve “operational control;”
Require the DHS Secretary to expand detention capacity, including by potentially reopening detention facilities that have been closed or whose use has been altered during the Biden administration;
Limit release from detention for asylum seekers with positive credible fear determinations, meaning they could likely remain in immigration detention for the duration of their asylum adjudication process, which in some cases can take multiple years;
Expand the use of programs modeled after MPP, so that migrants were returned to Mexico or Canada pending their removal proceedings or reviews; and
Make other changes to current asylum procedures.
@@leedexRead the actual bill. The Border Security and Enforcement Act of 2023 would significantly limit asylum in the U.S.
H.R. 2640 would restrict both access to and eligibility for asylum. In particular, the bill would:
Raise the initial screening standard so that a noncitizen would have to prove they were “more likely than not” to ultimately qualify for asylum in order to continue pursuing their protection claim and not be quickly removed from the U.S.;
Ban the vast majority of asylum seekers from requesting protection at a U.S. border if they traveled through a third country en route to the U.S. and were not denied asylum there;
Generally restrict asylum claims to only those migrants who arrive in the U.S. at an official port of entry;
Add exclusions to asylum eligibility, including by enacting restrictions against those who unlawfully received a federal public benefit or could reasonably avoid persecution by relocating to a safer area within their country of origin;
Deny employment authorization if an asylum seeker entered or tried to enter the U.S. at a place other than a port of entry;
Impose a fee of not less than $50 to apply for asylum, which might make it harder to afford to make a protection claim;
Narrow who qualifies for asylum based on their political opinion or membership in a particular social group, in ways that would curtail protection claims by generally excluding cases related to interpersonal violence, gang-related activity, or crime;
Allow the DHS Secretary to indefinitely suspend access to a land or maritime border for migrants who enter without admission or parole, misrepresent themselves to enter, or do not have valid documentation to enter, if doing so would help achieve “operational control;”
Require the DHS Secretary to expand detention capacity, including by potentially reopening detention facilities that have been closed or whose use has been altered during the Biden administration;
Limit release from detention for asylum seekers with positive credible fear determinations, meaning they could likely remain in immigration detention for the duration of their asylum adjudication process, which in some cases can take multiple years;
Expand the use of programs modeled after MPP, so that migrants were returned to Mexico or Canada pending their removal proceedings or reviews; and
Make other changes to current asylum procedures.
How come nobody can find out about Trump injury to his ear.why can't the American people get that information
It’s all over the news!!!!
I don't want to Hear About The Border Ever Again when The Best Proposal was Proposed and Republicans shut it Down for Political Purposes! So Obviously It it NOT a Concern!
Why does Biden "need permission". From Congress in order to do his job?
He didn't need permission for his vote buying project (student loan payoffs)
Dems wanted to steal the money for other projects. You're blaming the wrong party.
Biden could of taken executive action as soon as the border started getting out of control instead of waiting 4 years creating the biggest and worst border crisis in the history of our country, good thing the huge majority of Americans aren’t as delusional as you are
@@jameslawson6245 it wasn't a concern until democrats opened it and created the problem
That proposal did nothing to address border security. That was an immigration reform bill. It was not a border security bill. These are not the same thing. Republicans were demanding a border security bill oh and what we got was an immigration reform bill. That's why it didn't pass. And it's a good thing it didn't pass because it wouldn't have solved the problem, It would have made it much worse
Mass deportation would be an economic disaster.
And a win for the environment along with everything else.
'Give us your poor your tired your hungry'...😅🥲🗽bruh whet?! 😂😂😂SMDH Only USA 🇺🇸
Those are not American values
Go read a book these ppl been here since lands here were part of mexico and ppl never left maybe u should go back to ur country lol dum ass beach