What is Russia's military doctrine for deploying tactical nuclear weapons? | DW News
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 20 май 2024
- Earlier this month, Russia announced that it had plans to carry out tactical nuclear weapons exercises near the Ukrainian border. On Tuesday, Russia’s military began these drills in the Southern Military District for the first time since Russia’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in 2022. The Kremlin says the exercises are in response to Western military officials threatening deeper involvement in the war in Ukraine.
#warinukraine #tacticalnuke #russiaukrainewar
Subscribe: ruclips.net/user/deutsche...
For more news go to: www.dw.com/en/
Follow DW on social media:
►Facebook: / deutschewellenews
►Twitter: / dwnews
►Instagram: / dwnews
►Twitch: / dwnews_hangout
Für Videos in deutscher Sprache besuchen Sie: / dwdeutsch
Don't worry. These are nuclear shovels.
As a former RAN CBRN officer, I beg to differ! =)
Dont worry. This is just another ivan's shovelblabber.
If a channel making topic only about this thanks it's not a small thing
"Indeed! The impact of using these shovels is truly evident."
It's the only weapon they have. A sad, loser military run by a delusional dictator.
DW can you please tell us if the ukrainian counter offensive is still gaining momentum
still probing , trying to find a weak spot in RU army
According to newton, momentum can be gained on both directions, so probably yes.
Lol
They will always tell a big 'Yes', even claiming Ukraine is gaining territory inside Russia an even taking Moscow
05/22/2024. Simonyan. “I have full lists of 500 Ukrainian prisoners of war, which Kyiv has been refusing to exchange four months now. Zelensky selected 38 people - Azovites - and is ready to pick up only them. The rest of the soldiers of Ukraine - Ukraine is not needed, ”she wrote.
The journalist clarified that in her lists of name and dates of the birth of prisoners of the military. She promised to completely publish them in the evening.
“I think that wives, mothers and in general Ukrainian citizens will be interested in getting acquainted,” she wrote. As Tatyana Moskalkova, the Commissioner for Human Rights in Russia, indicated, the process of exchanging prisoners of war with the Ukrainian side is delayed due to the double standards of Kyiv, which delete from lists to exchange ordinary and sergeants, and many fighters deliberately write down among the missing ones. She noted that during exchanging, Ukraine, as a rule, prefers media people, and ordinary military personnel are of little interest to the authorities of a neighboring country.
i like how the expert is saying that the range is pretty limited.
yeah only 2000km, so they will only get to France , but they wont be able to get to Spain or the UK.
so that is pretty good :)
Ukraine/Gross domestic product (2021)
199.8 billion USD (2021)
In addition to the aid provided by the USA, other Western states also provide aid to Ukraine.
It is estimated that the total amount of Western aid provided directly to Ukraine in the last year exceeded 150 billion dollars. Almost all of this aid consists of military equipment and ammunition.
At current prices, the defense expenditure of the USA in 2022 is 821 billion dollars, followed by the UK with 67.7 billion dollars, Germany with 60.9 billion dollars, France with 52.4 billion dollars, Italy with 30.4 billion dollars and 28.1 billion dollars. Canada followed with dollar.
UK Germany France Italy total ammount 67 + 60 + 52 + 30 = around 210 billiom dollars but Ukraine is asking nato soldiers now. Ukraine is asking everything but they need honoured young men who wants to fight thier country.
After all the nukes will leave UK and Anglo Saxon free to rule the world. EU were the beneficiary of the pipeline but the big brother blew it up and they had nothing to say but praise the wisdom of the mighty. Poor Europe 😔😭😭
@@petersilas4234schizo orc 😂
You people really, REALLY need to learn the difference between tactical and strategic nuclear weapons...
@@PropaneWP i think you are the one who should open the wikipedia page and go and learn the difference.
since a tactical nuclear weapon yield can go to upto 50 kilotons which is more than double the one which was dropped on Nagasaki and 3x the one dropped on Hiroshima .
yeah and go read about the death toll and destruction of these 2 bombs as well.
A nuke is a nuke, cut the "tactical" bs
I do agree. Not matter of yield a nuclear weapon is nuclear weapon. Whether it's Strategic or Tactical I fear to see either go off.
😅🤣😂😅😂🤣😅
Too Little, Too Late.
There is a big difference between tactical and strategic nuclear weapons although the use of either is totally unacceptable.
very ignorant, you're doing the equivalent of looking at a car b°mb and a hand grenade and saying "a b°°b is a b°°b".
@@Rename_July you're ignorant for calling a grenade something it's not
Don't worry it's tactical 😂 peaceful atomic energy Fallout season 2
Day 818 of 3 day Special Needs Operation.
well... a nuclear winter is a panaceum.
🤣🤣😂
@@FVBmoviesfallout also affects Russia, don't forget. And they will lose China's support!
@@FVBmovies Stop the war and tell people the truth.
YT watch list
1.Donbass: 8 years of war" - Documentary
2.A New Cold War? Ukraine Violence Escalates, Leaked Tape Suggests U.S. Was Plotting Coup
3.F*** the EU: Alleged audio of US diplomat .... swearing
4......leaked phone conversation _COMPLETE with SUBTITLES
5. Inside A White Supremacist Militia in Ukraine
6, Video from March, "No one was interested in the Donbass before 2022
7.NN threat in new Ukraine: NEWSNIGHT, report of 2014
8. Ukraine's NN Problem
9. Ukraine's far-right children's camp: 'I want to bring up a warrior'
10. Why do some Ukrainians want to be part of Russia?
russia was too gentle compare to israel
What are your beliefs
Ruzzia is way worse.
@@pjhgerlach
The war in Ukraine (starting in 2014) has claimed around 20k civilian lives, whereas Israel's onslaught on the people of Gaza has claimed 40k civilian lives in just over 6 months.
@@pjhgerlach G@yfo troops have larger gay solider then of Russian🇷🇺
Swears is real was too brutal, like Dr turned Gaza to ground zero, made the inhabitants turn nomads.
They better take Russian warning seriously.
Is he the only one who has nukes?? LMAO 🤣 🤣 🤣
@aztraeai6pg908 well, they should dare him then
😂😂😂😂
Russia Would Cease To Exist, And They Know This. 👍
@@aztraeai6pg908 Of course not but if Putin is forced to use tactical nuclear weapons to avoid defeat and Nato then attacked Russian forces, that would soon lead to full scale nuclear war and the end of all of us. Do you want that? Putin is telling nato they cannot possibly win this war because they would use tactical nuclear weapons to prevent that. Nato needs to recognise that and talk about a peace settlement with Russia.
We had it all people. We had it all. Peace be upon you and your families.
In what name are you talking about?
@@dissco.partysan3333My guess is "most of humanity"....
The ordinary people who want to live their lives in peace.
@@meanderingbird286Its all fun and games until a dictator decides that you are in his way.
I'm 63 and this situation is becoming surreal. It's like the world's leaders have forgotten the stakes with these evil things. Read Annie Jacobsen -
Is it possible that Putin is insane enough to end the world over his personal pride and ambition? Maybe. Is it just as likely that NATO pushed too far East and he's reacting badly? Yes. Either way, Ukraine is not worth ending the world for...
lol this is like the end of Don’t Look Up, right??
Who deluded Ukraine into the fantasy of a victory over Russia. Seek peace before all gets lost
because it didnt take russia 3 days to take kiev
Russia is in big big trouble. China is Head office and US watching Russia weaknesses
Let say Ukraine agrees to a peace deal and give the lost territory but then 5 years from now Russia seeks more ground.....now what ? Another "peace" deal ?
If you believe in Putins statements about peace, you are very naive, without any guarantees from the West its only amistice! Victory is to prevent Ukraine from the following attacks by joining NATO or changing Putins regime!
@@Zeno7741you haven't learnt anything from your grandfather, or he didn't come back home..
I am a poor farmer from Russia and yesterday the soldiers took away 3 of my shovels with which I grew potatoes.I need help!
You shall not use nuclear shovels on potato fields as scientists discovered, and instruct your bear not to.
You will not need shovels anymore as your potato fields are 2 meters underwater... Just like the hut you lived in
Just drink more vodka and keep telling yourself how great Russia is. 😆
We can see them here getting deployed😂😂😂😂
😂🤣
Politicians will ensure they survive and ordinary citizens can just wave a Ukrainian flag as they enjoy the light show.
Definitely. Putin is a true politician who values his life. Remember the massive meeting table where Putin met Macron? By the way, the special military operation has lasted for over two years. When did Putin visited the front line?
it would be naive to think those giant tunneling machines have been lying dormant. and the very reason government elite puppets are behaving in this lawless manner we're witnessing. they know their genocidal services was a payment so they can be ruling class deep down there also.
@@zhangyiping100 He meant Western warmongerers ...
Oh my God, what in the world is going on?
Yeah the 7 month delay in US weapons to Ukraine has made him bolder
‘’NATO troops in Ukraine can’t be ruled out’’, that’s what
World War 3.
Fallout
@@wordzmyth actually this steps were in response to the threads of sending F16s and troops to Ukraine.
so you are incorrect.
Russian ROULETTE ?
Always we use shovels with washing machine processors 😂
Russian bluff and DW "experts" taking the bite.
@@Heinakuhi I don’t remember Putin ever bluffing.
Apparently western “leaders” love that game
@@Heinakuhi Russia said they'd demilitarize Ukraine.
Now Ukraine can't even find reserves to fight. Some Ukrainian villages don't even have males left.
What baffled me so much is that nobody is believing that he might use them, Putin is really mad don't underestimate him.
Putin haven't made a single thing painting him as mad. If anything he comes off as very calculating.
He won’t use them. He will lose support from China. Now is it possible that he uses a lower yield warhead if nato puts boots on the ground? Yes.
The reply to Russia is simple: the West gives a small number of "tactical" nuclear weapons to Ukraine, trains Ukrainians on how to use them, and announces that it relinquishes the trigger-pulling decision to Ukraine, ON CONDITION that such weapons can only be used if Russia uses them first. Ukraine has shown full respect on Western restrictions so far, so it's expected it would do the same with this rule as well.
Pure lunacy. You think Russia wouldn't hit back with strategic nukes if Ukraine nuked them?
How about we start talking to each other?
Are you one of my ex girlfriends?
Would’ve been the intelligent option but……… war makes governments invested a lot of cash, war makes news agencies a lot of cash, war is a better way for whichever government to control its populace then peace…….. and intelligent questions like yours are irrelevant within the world system that has become a reality…….. remember war good, Peace bad…..
@@davidaltamirano6828 yes, and i still have our strapone, we had a good time
@@srve1149😂
who to talk to? They're overseas and they don't care.
Www3 very much closer
15 KT was Hiroshima level she said 1-50
It's Only tactical distance only Baltic Countries and Poland don't worry
Tactical means radiation fallout distance. It lower smaller than strategic nukes its not about damage bombs cause damage thats their job
I went to google when she mentioned it, hoping these nukes would be much smaller than the only one we got to see in use (in Japan), for a reference. Turned out to be very concerned even if those nukes could never reach me, but bc if a precedent is open who knows what will follow.
@@MaxHohenstaufen No, Little Boy (Hiroshima) had a yield of 13-16 KT, a standard Russian launched Tactical Nuke has a yield of 50 KT, way more than what we has ever seen used in war. Tactical nukes are used to large scale destruction on battle fields and small to mid sized city killers.
На данный момент Хиросима и Нагасаки - мелочь . Россия таким оружием обладает , вам и не снилось , собачки США и НАТО - Все и вся планета умрем , нам и вам это НАДО ? Русские - готовы умирать , много войн пройдено . а Вы ?
The Hiroshima bomb was 15KT and killed 80k people instantly, these are not "tactical"
The tactical nukes range from one-tenth of the Hiroshima bomb on up. The video says 1-kiloton tactical nukes, which would be even smaller. The smaller size of the tactical nukes allows them to be fired from artillery, or dropped as bombs, or fired as cruise-missiles. They now have low-radiation nukes. 'Tactical' as opposed to 'strategic', huge, inter-continental, ballistic nuclear missiles.
@@regularfolks8285 didn't they say up to 50kt?
Other countries have nukes, Ivan. Russia must be losing if tue nuke threats are coming out
Or it's a Tuesday, Putin only has the one card to play so he flashes it all the time hoping nobody notices his old Soviet garbage wasn't maintained and doesn't work.
If you have nukes why don't you go into Ukraine ?
@Blodhelm you should go to the frontline and fight since those Russians are so incompetent. Typical keyboard warrior with zero military or war experience.
Other countries do have nukes. But Russia has the most.
Humankind will lose
Russia 🇷🇺 has a right to defend itself against western terrorism
If we had this news 2 years ago, everyone would be panicking.
But today, we are so numb to all of this that even nukes don't bother us.
The ambassadors of Britain and France arrived at the Russian Foreign Ministry.
The British diplomat spent half an hour in the facility and left without speaking to the press.
Following him, the French ambassador arrived at the Russian Foreign Ministry.
The reasons for the visit are not reported. Moscow probably handed the British a note in response to Cameron’s statement about the possibility of using British weapons on the territory of the Russian Federation. And the French - to Macron’s statement about the possibility of sending troops to Ukraine.
After these statements, we recall that the Russian Federation began exercises on the use of tactical nuclear weapons
It's actually the opposite, Ivan. Russia was training before that.
it was all on Macron's face when he commented of summing French ambassador - it was very serious and very sharp warning they've got - Macron was factually stunned 😁
@@antoniousai1989cool story Stepan Bandera. 😂
B.S. story
your story is so nice to read while drinking a bottle of vodka
Space Nuclear ☢️ posture = nuclear ☢️ deterrence?!!
would america accept dat?
@@jaysondgreat8171 Deterrence exists so long as America 🇺🇸 doesn't have an answer to adversary's weapons. The moment America has a superior weapon it uses. In other words, don't be surprised when America 🇺🇸 begins an All out First ☢️ Strike. America reserves itself the exclusive rights to First ☢️ Strike.
"Si vis pacem para bellum" is the base principle of deterrence.
Ваши Ядерные войска нас -- русских , - не волнуют совсем. Вы и мы не узнаем , что и как. Катаклизм природы или ядерный удар. Просто все сдохнем в своих домах и ВСЕ.
Finally some sane people explain the situation calmly who don't suggest nothing but escalation from their safe offices with air conditioner.
You are encouraging Putin to be belligerent with Nukes. Eventually he will feel the need to escalate the threat to reclaim its lost effectiveness. Being weak is the only thing that 'provokes' Putin.
Unlike many NATO leaders, Putin has shown to be the type who talks the talk and walks the walk. So don’t push him. Macron and Sunak.
After threat number 500099990999999. Russia is so weak it can't win conventionally so they resort to nukes. Embarrassing 😂😂
Putin is bluffing. That's what he learned as a KGB agent. By the way, Putin is probably the richest person in the world. He doesn't want to die.
Very true. Ukraine is clearly winning. Their counter offensive was such a spectacular success. Bravo @@Wvavy
@@kharkanas6779 never said they're winning. But Russia hasn't won 😂
@@Wvavy I remember there is only one country on earth that has ever used Nuclear weapons... Are you saying that country is weak? They were too scared of Japan that they had to kill over 200 000 innocent people?
Which powerful weapon again?
De-escalate the war.
I think we are way past that now..
Good advice for Russia.
It seems impossible.. for that, you need normal people in the west..
@@Someonesaidthisthat's a job only Donald Trump can do. Love him or hate him he knew how to handle North Korea, Russia and China.
DW deleted all my comments... 😂
“Not tactical nuclear weapons. It’s special military projectiles.” Russia
Правда что - ли ? Это новейшее ядерное оружие в 100 метров вниз , бункеры не помогут . Умрем все вместе.. , Оружие , превосходящее то , что США применили в Нагасаки и Хиросиме . во много раз . Япония стала собачкой , Россия - не станет никогда и Китай , кстати. !!!!
Ukraine is losing. So might be NATO sends troops. In that case Russia would lose. Before they lose Russians will use tactical atomic weapons in Ukraine. Then what will NATO do? That I don't know.
NATO will do nothing. Ukraine is not that important to them.
No Russia won't loose remember that no one like NATO chines n north Korea will make sure that NATO fails
Yeah, everything is going to plan.
They ll do nothing else they ll get the nuclear mail delivered straight to their cities 😂😂
No, Ukraine is NOT losing. Why? Because for Ukraine to be losing Russia must be winning, and the Russian definition of winning is removing Ukraine as a nation and an identity from the face of the earth, in Putin's lifetime. And at the current pace, Russia will need 100 years to do that. So the correct thing to say is NEITHER is winning, and that means Ukraine is suffering, and suffering needlessly. We in the West need to change that. But we don't do that by being surrender monkeys. Especially not when the people doing the actual fighting are no where near surrender.
time to invest in fallout shelters boys
No point. You be waiting 10 year's for food to grow again,but don't be scared when you see your reflection in radiation mirror 🤢
Who is laughing at all the doomsday prepper now - I know I'm not 😂 well almost
Waste of money, don't be afraid to die, because we are all going to die.
Nato is an American imperialist murderous army.
LOL like that Russian garbage from 50 years ago still works.
I love how we're doing everything in our power to have nuclear missiles, capable of destroying world many times over, oppose each other on the shortest distance possible.
"tactical nukes are much less, only 1-50kt"
Not like Hirosima was 15kt and Nagasaki was 20kt.
So 3.3 Hiroshima's, or 2.5 Nagasaki's, ya no big deal
Mr. President: What would it take for Russia to break the nuclear ‘taboo’?
Putin: Ever since the first primitive humans settled Russia during the stone age…
wtf, the rocket tip is censored?
it was not pointy enough
Мы посмотрели фильм "диктатор" Саши Коэна, там было сказано что наконечник ракеты не влияет на аэродинамику, по этому мы решили сделать его в форме члена
yup those big cannons cant be shown on youtube ;)
Censored by the Russians so you can’t tell what kind of warhead.
It’s all about the tip girl, remember this
Looks like Russia is inviting more anti-air and F-16 fighters.
Russian dont bluff
@@shimalperera6268 they have been bluffing for almost 80 years...
@@thegreatdane3627Russian never bluff look at Ukraine then you know the meaning of bluffing.its news outlets that bluff Ukraine is winning whilst failed to recapture 30%of lost territory
@@tatendawilson3057ruZZia promised to never invade Ukraine, then invaded, why would you admit its bluffing
What is wrong with u??? U hate ruZZia for no reason orcbot?? Why are you defaming it
@@heartpaid6767 what about Nato's promise to not expend its reach..
NATO needs to understand that playing Russian roulette with a nuclear superpower is never a good idea
Russia as 1/10 of the nuclear assets that NATO has.
Why should we scared by the little bully?
No, NATO needs to understand that capitulating to every pathetic threat from a nuclear toddler is never a good idea.
no one wins in a nuclear war
But there ego will destroy them NATO can't digest another power 😂😂
@@corvomichele😂😂😂😂😂 do u know how many Tsar need for whole eroupe 😂😂 only few so who r little bully 😂😂
The second interviewee didn't know either. The information required is 'does such a weapon wipe out a large conglomeration of troops? ' Well there are no such large agglomerations, just thin lines, so they would just render a large area to be lethal for Russian troops to enter. He mentioned 'smaller' cities'. What is the use of doing that to Russia?
For anyone having a hard time visualizing the scale of what are considered 'tactical' nukes - 1 kilaton is about 3x the size of the beirut explosion. Hiroshima/Nagasaki were 15/21kt approximately. Tactical nukes are considered 50kt or below, or 2-3x the size of the ones used in Japan.
This is what happens when your conventional forces can't get the job done, and you know it
And he will not even use them. He is just trying to bluff his way it. "Guys, I will use this. I promise. Just give up."
Hmm.. they're literally winning the war on the battlefield.
Considering putins conventional forces are steamrolling Ukraine, your statement doesn’t make much sense.
I will never understand why peace wasn't an option in the first place. Lives could have been saved, it is never too late to pursue peace.
Interesting that German journalist when talked of nuclear weapons specifically mentioned about using it by USA.
The strategic nukes were designed to destroy the US. The ICBMs made by the soviets had the requirement to be able to reach Washington dc and other major US cities before the US could destroy them all. This happened during the cold war and the enemy was the US. So it's obvious if the russians ever use them the US would be either the sole or the #1 target.
This should come as no surprise. Thanks Joe, thanks VDL and thanks Boris and Sunak. Should have negotiated.
You misspelled "appeased".
French president Macron did try to negotiate before the war. But it's indeed not a surprise. Remember the massive meeting table? Putin is very very concerned about his life. There will be no surprise.
Thanks Joe? So Vladimir threatens to start a nuclear war and your immediate response is to thank Joe, Boris and Sunak?
I suggest you take the time to look at the peace agreement on the table Istanbul April 2022. Russian troops would with draw. Ukraine would except for Crimea remain in tact. Selenski could stay with referendums held after a number of yrs in the Donest...the one condition Russia asked for was that Ukraine would NOT be apart of Nato. Neutral the same as Austria is neutral and rich. All this is available on the internet...no secret. Thousands of talking heads on western media but no one ever mentions Istanbul...wonder why ?
To you.. try some critical analysis you don't have to be a sheeple !
@@timhaldane7588 why don't u go in the trench and fight?
In the south of Russia on May 21, the first stage of military exercises began with the practical development of the preparation and use of tactical nuclear weapons, which includes a range of up to 5,500 km and the capacity of the same warhead up to 300 kilotons in Trotyl equivalent. At the first stage, the Iskander and Dagols are involved in a range of up to 500 km and 2000 km, respectively.
Using the word tactical doesn’t make them sound any less dangerous to all of us on this planet
The world is near the end, any miscalculated move might be dangerous to everyone
Either way ruSSia is history.
@@DarxKiesyou should tell your family that they'all gonna meet jesus soon😂
@@nuke_Godjira Probably not so soon. Remember the massive meeting table when Putin met Macron and his officials? Putin is very concerned about his life.
@@zhangyiping100 You didn't see such meeting was a derogation to Macron? He clearly belittles Macron.
@@ehismichael6917 So when people try to negotiate with Putin, Putin belittles them. When people fight against Putin's aggression, Putin blames them for not negotiating?
Thank DW about tactical nuclear weapon
Why are the tips of those missiles censored, are they made in Japan?
What a great question if this was day one of the war. Why is this a valid question now?
U guys think nuke are joke? someone will cry later dont worry😅
If u are afraid of russian nukes, just move to Russia. I am sure u will be safe there.
as if only Russia has nukes
@@icu17siberia that was my point and is also the reason that its just intimidation tactics
Putin is going to send in his secret weapon.... Stephen Segal
It's not about Ukraine, no country will use nukes in the modern world and get away with it, the country which uses nukes will only sign its own death certificate, the only reason USA got away with it with Japan is because no one else had nukes back then.
You think NATO will do anything if Russia decides to nuke Ukraine?
FYI 14 kilotons was the yield of the atom bomb dropped on Hiroshima and 21kt is the yield of the a-bomb dropped on Nagasaki. So 50 kt is 2 Hiroshimas plus 1 Nagasaki, so actually a pretty big deal.
Russia be like: Hey we still matters. Look at our ancient guns.
America be like: 'We are going to stick our nose where it doesn't belong... Also, look at our ultra-costly weapons which have yet to change the face of the war in favor of Ukraine.'
When the bombs fall you won’t be making lame jokes; you’ll be crying
Maby they wont work, since they are made by dishwasher chips 😂😂😂
@@JB-sf4pgUSA has been sending its scraps. Ukraine would have driven Russia out if it had latest USA techs.
But then again a 40 year old tank is considered high tech by moskals.
@@gikigill788 Yes, that old junk is top modern by ruzzian standards. But old junk it is.
Russia should be reminded that they are not the only ones who have the ability to launch such weapons. Secondly , Russians breathe oxygen like any other nation and they will not survive a nuclear war either.
Please grow up and start thinking before you post comments on serious poltical issues.
if russia use nukes in ukraine or even in a nato country that dont have nukes itself you think uk france or usa will risk their countries getting nuked by atacking russia 🤭
It's Russia that get attacked. If they use it I don't think west will do anything other than ICC case to arrest Putin. That is the best thing they can do. I don't think they will risk on a move to Russia. Russia is too powerful to mess around
yes. but Russians have no say...only Putin has a say and he isnt worried about what's best for Russian people.
@@avex3903I bet you, if Russia decides to use nukes in Eastern Europe, NATO won't do a thing especially the US, that's is why they didn't give Poland nukes.
1kt to 50kt... but remember, the bomb that wiped out Hiroshima was 16kt. That is to say, the Hiroshima bomb was on the lower end of our tactical nuclear weapons scale.
Warheads have to be blurred or is that the Russian footage that was used?
No they have been pretty blunt about why they are there. Ukraine is not joining NATO so they can host US weapons, missile systems, and military bases on their border. Two signed peace agreements with Ukraine since 2014...Zelensky disregarded these agreements
russian troll alarm.
you know what agreement russia constantly disregards?
It did so when invading the czechens, it did so when it invaded georgia, it did so when it invaded ukraine in 2014.
The UN agreement of 1991 where russia ITSELF gave its consent.
Cold war whataboutism didnt get any younger.
05/22/2024. Simonyan. “I have full lists of 500 Ukrainian prisoners of war, which Kyiv has been refusing to exchange four months now. Zelensky selected 38 people - Azovites - and is ready to pick up only them. The rest of the soldiers of Ukraine - Ukraine is not needed, ”she wrote.
The journalist clarified that in her lists of name and dates of the birth of prisoners of the military. She promised to completely publish them in the evening.
“I think that wives, mothers and in general Ukrainian citizens will be interested in getting acquainted,” she wrote. As Tatyana Moskalkova, the Commissioner for Human Rights in Russia, indicated, the process of exchanging prisoners of war with the Ukrainian side is delayed due to the double standards of Kyiv, which delete from lists to exchange ordinary and sergeants, and many fighters deliberately write down among the missing ones. She noted that during exchanging, Ukraine, as a rule, prefers media people, and ordinary military personnel are of little interest to the authorities of a neighboring country.
Peace is the only sane and sensible option.
Tell Putin
Only sane and...option is if Russia abandons its wars and brings its troops back.
Peace is obtained by invading countries
@@davidhoover3347 Hasnt zelensky outlawed peace talks?
She underplays the seriousness of these weapons. When she points out that tactical nukes are only between 1 to 50 kilotons, she neglects to make clear how powerful a 50 kiloton nuke is - the bomb that was dropped on Hiroshima was 15 kilotons. In general, she seems to me like some kind of sleep walker who doesn't comprehend the gravity of the situation. The man who comes on second is the same. We're talking powerful weapons here and besides, once the lock is off the nuclear Pandora's box anything can happen. This is very dangerous.
I think they are just trying to make all the action at the nuclear sites look like practice but ut in reality they're gonna use them
If Russia breaks this rule it is not a safe thing for Russia which means still bluff
Anyone who thinks it is a Russian bluff does it at his own peril.
Thanks to all the Russian bots for boosting DW in the YT algorithm. Its a great channel to get your news!
You are bot
@@goldenhord7281 for real, esp when the Russian bots just have their comments deleted lmao. I left a comment so my algorithm was already gonna be screwed, what's one more?
You right, American bots watch CNN
@@robert48044 👍
Its beyond me how people still distinguish tactical and strategic nukes from being different
“Like it or not, beauty, you have to put up with it."
Question is will moscow nearby will also somehow get affected by the future fallout since wind can blow the direction of Moscow or nearby city ?
I love how all experts say, Ruzzia will NEVER use nuclear weapons unless they lose the war in Ukraine.
Well, the whole point of helping Ukraine is to kick Ruzzia out of its borders.
This means, Ruzzia will lose the war. Which means Ruzzia will use nuclear weans.
So, the statement should say: Ruzzia WILL use tactical weapons because they are losing the war.
Right? LIKE WTF?!
😂 щепкин всё никак не решается нажать на кнопку 😂
Who says Russia is losing? Even pro Ukraine western media now admits momentum is currently in favor of Russia.
Nato hope that by helping Ukraine prolonging the war perhaps Russia will withdraw
Russia are win war any condition
When Russia started the inversion in Ukraine it started as military drills close to Ukraine border🤔
The 'let's explain to the audience' bit about saying that they are 'only' tactical nuclear weapons......modern nuclear tactical weapons are many many many times more powerful and destructive than the ones used in Japan. Completely different beasts.
The military expert does not know Russian military doctrine. Putin does NOT sign off on their use like would happen in a western country. The military can use them when they see fit, if they believe they are losing Russian territory and cannot keep it. Its a very simple thing. If Russia cannot hold the "invaded regions" that they now consider part of Russia, the nuclear weapons are at the discretion of the military to use regardless of what Putin says. The government makes the rules, it does not command the forces directly. Is nothing like the US "commander in chief" concept.
Why Nafo Needs to Send troops to Ukraine? I thought theyre winning? They only have 30k casualties remember? 😂
Damn. NAFO lives rent-free in your brain. Did they hurt your feelings that bad? Poor baby.
I thought Russia was already fighting all of NATO?
Now the russian dance is becoming serious 😢
Seriously laughable
The more ruzzia is dancing on their nukes, the more we know the war is going bad for them.
Still they'll never use them. pootin likes his power too much.
The more the pressure things will definitely get worse
@@larsrons7937 we never know what's next
@@imoran9228 We have to ask ourselves the question: "How will using nukes help russia to win the war?" The answer we find is that it won't. But it will lead to russia losing a lot of political support from the rest of the world. And probably have all their military assets in Ukraine destroyed in a few days, or their entire Baltic Sea fleet sunk, or something the like. So all in all it can only be bad for russia, not good. So they won't use them. Their value is when they talk about them and some people get afraid, not understanding that they won't use them.
Tactical nucks are not intended to be used in Ukraine. They are intended to be used on those places where the Rus enemigos would assamble and base themselves as well as their main bases . They lower capabaility IS a mit as they are small ones as the ones intended to be used in tanks and morters which can compare to depleted Uraniun sheels but there are bigger ones like the ones intended to SHIELD the stratosfere around Russia
As I understand it from a recent video, China has advised Russia against using nukes, and a much earlier video argued that Russia would be the junior partner is a relationship with China. Taken together, that seems consistent, and for me, those videos were months apart so that seems significant as well. But in light of this video, what does that really mean ?
A military doctrine matters in a real country, it does not mean jack squat in Russia.
Tactical washing machines right?
They need to make it more pointy.
The west finally got a match. Not everybody is no Iraq, baby😂
Antony Blinken will be strumming again after the fallout of his policies.
*Nuclear* fallout
Right.. It's not the invadors fault. It's the fault of those who reject their barbarism.
2025 Zelensky: F16 is not enough to beat Russia, we want F35. 200 billion dollars is not enough, we want 500 billion dollars. We want 4 aircraft carriers. 50 Hermes bags for my wife, 50 Rolex watches for me, Rolls Royce, Bentley Ferrari, Bugatti, 5 ultra-luxury yachts worth 500 million dollars each, 10 houses worth 100 million dollars in Dubai, Burj Khalifa building in Dubai, Eiffel Tower, a house on Mars for the holidays. Bring the Eiffel Tower, Pizza Tower, Egyptian Pyramids, Statue of Liberty and Venice to Ukraine so that more tourists can come to Ukraine during the war. If you do not do these, Russia may attack you and Ukraine cannot protect you. If Ukraine is defeated, the whole world will be defeated and democracy will lose.
Why's the tip of the missile censored? It's not NSFW content
A message to the future generations never make russia feel threatened
the difference between "looking dangerous" and "being dangerous".Russia
describes military doctrine as defensive military doctrine. With regard
to nuclear weapons specifically, Russia reserves the right to use
nuclear weapons: in response to the use of nuclear and other types of
weapons of mass destruction against it or its allies,in case of
aggression against Russia with the use of conventional weapons when the
very existence of the state is threatened
How do Russian nuclear weapons compare to the rest of the world?
Russia - 6,257
America 5,550
UK - 225
France - 290
China - 350
Israel - 90
Pakistan - 165
India - 156
North Korea - 40
This lady normally speaks in sane manner
Both parties..nato and Russia,let this world be a peaceful place for all of us to live.Shift your energies to other things like climate change and pandemics
LOL CLIMATE CHANGE
Kremlin trolls, India started paying for oil with bananas. If I were you, I'd start looking for another job.
Russia isn't going to fight for that land a third time. They're patient with NATO but that patience ain't unlimited.
🇺🇸🇷🇺
I think, that missile only for blackmail. 😅😅😅
Who's war is this
USA 🇺🇸 , Profits of it economically and politically without any soldier's deaths and far enough away that nuclear risk is very limited! Baerbock etc are dumb enough to follow their path ...
Everyone's - yours as well
Russian imperialists to expand
USA's hegemonial ambitions
Putin
The smell of unconditional surrender is getting stronger 🤣🤣🤣
nah, i don't think russia is ready to surrender yet. It will take a few more years.
Tell us what you smoke 😂😂😂
Russia will lose this war
@@zoom777 dat is Danilo from Lemberg, the moment he stop posting he'll be sent to storm robotine village.
From which side?
Tactics adds up to become a Strategy many times.
На Юге России 21 мая начался первый этап военных учений с практической отработкой подготовки и применения тактического ядерного оружия, к которому относятся средства поражения дальностью до 5500 км и мощностью одной боеголовки до 300 килотонн в тротиловом эквиваленте. На первом этапе задействованы "Искандеры" и "Кинжалы" дальностью до 500 км и 2000 км соответственно.
This drills are needed to get warmongering nato to think twice.
Russia is literally inside Ukraine waging war
@@gudnikristinnagainst the collective West.
@@rettro6578 Attacking innocent civilians to get at the collective West summarizes Russia's pathetic state.
@@gudnikristinn I don't argue with ignorant people.
Putin been talking good game since 2022. But they have no guts to follow up.
Thats bcause he is sane the moment he thinks he has nothing to lose he will use them
@@cannibalronny7314 To certain extent I actually agree with you. Remember the massive meeting table where Putin met Macron and his officials? Putin is sane, and he has things to lose.
Do you know that nuclear weapons haven't been tested since the 70s? Ever since that time period, thousands of satellites have been launched into orbit. A high altitude nuclear test can take down worldwide communications, internet, TV you name it. It will impact your life in ways you haven't yet imagined. NATO know this, so calmer heads are prevailing for now. Be careful what you wish for.
@@zhangyiping100 At 75 you stop caring if the world ends with you
@@cannibalronny7314 Sure. Though dictators usually do not have friends, Putin does have daughters.
Nuclear aircon with chips from dishwashers.
People know which is the paper tiger and the real bear.
The Hiroshima and Nagasaki bombs were 15kt and 21kt respectively. So they would classify as tactical nukes today.
DW, please stop stirring up this war. 22 May 2024.
@@nom_chompsky Try it, comrade. See what happens.
@@nom_chompsky That will not happen, Poland is member of the EU. Mr. Putin surely knows the consequences of that, he is not silly, like (most of the, not all) EU politicians and the UK, trying to push this war. 22 May 2024.
Nuclear is nuclear no other thing to say
They said it was tactical nuclear to launch nuclear weapons without redline...
So a nuclear power station is the same as a nuclear missile?
Putin keeps threatening nukes to overcompensate for the little missile in his pants….JS
We got I.D. Intelligent design first....for starters...