04:53 ontop the block -hole A STEEL WATER COOLING JACKET PLATE TO PROTECT NEW OLD HARDWARD No holes except f9/fh like deluge to protect all QDs and the dual buckecket+ the square underside of the olm wiill have firex 2.0 for spin prime tests i bet and more pipe room, to accommodate all that and the water deluged sprays from thesese mega buckets, so the nitro-powered deluge is gonna need an upgrade those piper+ the amout of water needs to be trippled
I still think that it doesn't make sense to de-orbit the ISS when it could be put in a higher stable orbit. It could be used for parts in the future, as there are parts that could be re-used. In the future man will be able to maneuver in space, once we figure out how to do it.
No, don’t’ think so. Costs just as much to raise it as to deorbit it- and THEN you have to spend a lot of money to maintain it there (it’s not free). And aging aerospace materials in LEO do NOT get better with age, ok? Trust me on that score. We need to develop eventually a real commercial recycling industry in space- but it’s not there yet, and we can’t leave it floating up there, soaking up funds that could be better used elsewhere- all while serving as a source for future orbital debris- Dave Huntsman
That deorbit vehicle could have greater use than meerely crashing the station. If it didn't crash it could be used as a utility vehicle. Its refuelable isn't it or could be? Whay powers those draco thrusters? It doesn't use as much fuel as a starship. Just sayin
00:00 Starship Updates: Flight 6 Launch Date, Raptor Explosion & HLS Starship Inside Scoop
12:28 First-Ever ISS Reboost by Dragon! - CRS-31 Mission Highlights
Learn More:
1. Starship V2 Explained:
Summary: shorturl.at/9Iudv
Detailed Explanations:
a. Design Improvements Update 1: shorturl.at/lpGT7
b. Design Improvements Update 2: shorturl.at/gwNQ4
c. Nosecone & Payload Bay Redesign: shorturl.at/xa60S
d. Methane Downcomer Redesign: shorturl.at/XdYBG
2. Starship V3 Features: shorturl.at/mnBT4
3. Starship V2, V3 & Raptor V2, V3 Complete 2024 Update: shorturl.at/tN248
4. Raptor V3 Mega Upgrades & First Test: shorturl.at/TRIyj
5. Latest Starship Upgrades
a. Starship Hot Staging Explained: shorturl.at/jf400
b. Super Heavy Booster Upgrades: shorturl.at/Pi5R3
c. How SpaceX Protect Raptor Engines: shorturl.at/4Om8F
d. Starship New Heat Tiles Explained: shorturl.at/p2Ijb
6. Starship Flight 5 Analysis Complete Breakdown: ruclips.net/video/JY4aGEt03N4/видео.html
7. Starship Flight 5 Aftermath: Booster Issues That You Missed & Launch Pad Damages: shorturl.at/6SJi1
8. SpaceX ISS Deorbit Vehicle: shorturl.at/lDlF1
9. CRS 31 Science Investigations: shorturl.at/3nGAa
Weekly Updates: bit.ly/3HIQjPC
SpaceX Playlist: bit.ly/34wue8T
Facebook Page: facebook.com/scientiaplus
You may be able to improve the pronunciation for 'spacex' by playing around with the spelling of the word. I.e. 'space-ex' or 'space ex', ect.
Thank you for getting to the many points quickly without unnecessary bla bla bla. Kudos.
Great video
04:53 ontop the block -hole A STEEL WATER COOLING JACKET PLATE TO PROTECT NEW OLD HARDWARD No holes except f9/fh like deluge to protect all QDs and the dual buckecket+ the square underside of the olm wiill have firex 2.0 for spin prime tests i bet and more pipe room, to accommodate all that and the water deluged sprays from thesese mega buckets, so the nitro-powered deluge is gonna need an upgrade those piper+ the amout of water needs to be trippled
I still think that it doesn't make sense to de-orbit the ISS when it could be put in a higher stable orbit. It could be used for parts in the future, as there are parts that could be re-used. In the future man will be able to maneuver in space, once we figure out how to do it.
No, don’t’ think so. Costs just as much to raise it as to deorbit it- and THEN you have to spend a lot of money to maintain it there (it’s not free). And aging aerospace materials in LEO do NOT get better with age, ok? Trust me on that score. We need to develop eventually a real commercial recycling industry in space- but it’s not there yet, and we can’t leave it floating up there, soaking up funds that could be better used elsewhere- all while serving as a source for future orbital debris- Dave Huntsman
That deorbit vehicle could have greater use than meerely crashing the station. If it didn't crash it could be used as a utility vehicle. Its refuelable isn't it or could be? Whay powers those draco thrusters? It doesn't use as much fuel as a starship. Just sayin
Don't suppose the recent election has anything to do with this
Ich bin wirklich enttäuscht von diesem Video.
Das ist nicht gud!
A more useful comment, please.