Strategic Defense Initiative: The Technical Challenge

Поделиться
HTML-код
  • Опубликовано: 26 дек 2024

Комментарии • 27

  • @Dragon029
    @Dragon029  6 лет назад +3

    For a higher quality version of this video, visit this version uploaded by Phil Cipher: ruclips.net/video/TFGNo9fbf8o/видео.html

  • @ericzerkle5214
    @ericzerkle5214 5 лет назад +10

    I find the whole SDI program fascinating....

  • @christophertadeo6120
    @christophertadeo6120 3 года назад +1

    This was in 1983...they already finished it...

  • @BrianWilliamDoty
    @BrianWilliamDoty 2 года назад +1

    You can't just use lasers, when what I am saying there are so many lasers and railguns protecting Earth. So put a street sweeper in orbit to clean up all the it is the space race has created around Earth especially with the satellites there's so many satellites in so many different types of orbits and if one of these impacted it can completely destroy another satellite in a different orbit it depends on how intense the impact is and all that type of stuff so he had to clean it up you got to put a street sweeper up there in orbit to clean up all the little b**** that are like one foot across, and because it's one foot across we can use the unit circle in calculus and beyond into linear algebra and such to determine what?

  • @Dragon029
    @Dragon029  9 лет назад +1

    @EnX B
    James (US) from this site: www.oddcast.com/home/demos/tts/tts_example.php

  • @SacrificialIrishGoat
    @SacrificialIrishGoat 9 лет назад

    Which text to speech program did you use for the f-35 myth busting videos?

  • @Freedom2x462
    @Freedom2x462 4 года назад +2

    Possible now! it cheaper and quicker , Do it !

  • @michaelanderson3096
    @michaelanderson3096 11 месяцев назад

    Solar powered laser satellites in Earth's orbit 💫 as the first line of defense aganist inter continental missiles.

  • @lucasbowering
    @lucasbowering 8 лет назад +4

    When it comes to nuclear war the attacker will always have the advantage. For every billion dollars you spend trying to shoot down my ICBMs I can spend a million dollars creating decoys and hardening my missiles thereby neutralising your defensive measures.

    • @KazenoniKakuremi
      @KazenoniKakuremi 6 лет назад +3

      exactly. Robert McNamara reached that conclusion, when the soviets argued that ballistic missile defense was not covered by the treaty. Each MIRVed ICBM back then had ten warheads and both us and the soviets had almost 2000 land based ICBM's (ex-sub and surface vessel launched).
      and this is just the weapon system for firing, then you have to spend a sh88 load more on the systems for: search, acquisition, track and target. Which with for non-ballistic trajectory projectiles with built-in countermeasures....is far far less than 100%. Oh and each of those MIRVed warheads were thermonuclear 10-15MT i.e. 1000x hiroshima, so missing even 1 is devastating and not an option. No one can ever guarantee 100%
      Too much money for uncertain result. Overwhelming offense that ensure MAD has/is will always be the best deterrent.

    • @MrFungi69
      @MrFungi69 6 лет назад +1

      Exactly which russian and u.s. icbms "back then" are capable of 100-150mt total payload?

    • @ericzerkle5214
      @ericzerkle5214 5 лет назад

      @@KazenoniKakuremi But MAD likely wont work with NK as they are batshit crazy enough to risk it all..

    • @SpinSatx
      @SpinSatx 5 лет назад

      @@ericzerkle5214 That isn't exactly true; that's what they want us to think. They want what we want, they just want it on their terms so they can get the upper hand. Kim Jong Un doesn't want to die in a huge explosion, and he definitely doesn't want a war. He wants what we have though.

  • @Kvn-yh9zz
    @Kvn-yh9zz Год назад

    Ну что - удалось что-то создать из этой программы? Или миллиарды долларов ушли в никуда?

    • @Spirit-h1j
      @Spirit-h1j Год назад

      Если Маск сделает дешевый старшип, многое из этой хроники можно будет с легкостью осуществить

  • @PresidentialHENRIBorno
    @PresidentialHENRIBorno 4 года назад +1

    DJd MPSE

  • @louisvarre2197
    @louisvarre2197 5 лет назад +4

    The best anti-Soviet deterrence was Moscow’s inability to feed their people. The total failure of communism, though protracted and obstinate, eventually collapsed. The system has inherent flaws that ‘help’ it reach a critical mass that consumes itself. The rest of the story is purely luck and anecdotal.

    • @Kvn-yh9zz
      @Kvn-yh9zz Год назад

      Полная чушь.

  • @andrewlambert7246
    @andrewlambert7246 3 года назад

    I love and respect Ronald Reagan as the greatest commander even greater than Elexander the great. History will prove me right one say. In the case of the Star Wars Reagan was wrong.