YTT Tribe Reclaims Diablo Canyon’s Nuclear Land | Earth Focus | PBS SoCal
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 28 апр 2024
- The Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant sits on the ancestral homelands of the yak titʸu titʸu yak tiłhini Northern Chumash Tribe. When the plant was posed to close, the YTT Tribe developed a land back proposal. This plan became less clear when California decided to reverse that decision. Whether or not a nuclear plant operates on their lands, they are determined to reclaim and care for their land.
Learn more at bit.ly/3NNzJ4T
~~~~~~
Subscribe to our RUclips Channel: bit.ly/3wiFfZ2
Follow us:
Instagram: / pbssocal
TikTok: / pbssocal_kcet
Facebook: / pbssocal
Sign-up for our Newsletter: bit.ly/3wby5Gb
#diablocanyon #environment #nuclearpower #nativeamerican 
Развлечения
The tribe should be allowed to develop some of it. Not a casino, but tribal homes that have zero property taxes and an ability to access the ocean via a marina.
Looks like a win-win for everyone, especially if the plant keeps running. The tribe gets the land back, and CA gets a huge amount of reliable, clean power. The video is also a testament to nuclear's tiny footprint on the landscape, per kW-hr generated (9% of all CA's power, from a single, compact facility).
This is powerful! yak titʸu titʸu yak tiłhini Tribe has a documented history on this land, and it's incredible to hear their plan regain their homeland while partnering with the community. Their proposed stewardship plan shows a thoughtful approach to balancing cultural restoration with California's energy needs. This is an oportunity for California to make history. LANDBACK for yak titʸu titʸu yak tiłhini Tribe!
So Cal Poly is going to build on it and use it? Sounds odd that on the one hand the Chumash want the land back because it is where their ancestors were buried, and Cal Poly wants to develop it? It doesn't make sense.
Thanks so much to the YTT Tribe for balancing their right to restore their ancestral homeland with the need to keep this small-footprint, yet major clean energy source operational. I hope their thoughtfulness is repaid many times over.
Not sure why PGnE acts like they are part owner of land
They’re still taking from the natives ???? No pos wow.
Looks like a Casino is on the way!!
Don’t be so obtuse.
@@penelopefin5092 Sorry i forgot the luxury highrise hotel spa and RV park with a 30 pump gas station.
Isn't there a fault line right next to Diablo Canyon? Isn't That why closing the plant is so important? -Get that stuff away from our ocean!
Nuclear is the safest energy source there is. Stop closing perfectly good Nuclear plants in a climate crisis.
The plant is designed to withstand earthquakes, and will likely be an asset in the event of a large one because it could still provide power when gas lines (California’s primary energy source) could be ruptured. There is is no meaningful danger to the public from Diablo experiencing a large quake. Worst case scenario, the plant is taken offline and repairs are made.
@@ryn4181 Yeah I don't think it's fair saying that's the worst-case scenario... Sounds more like propaganda than insight. ?
Just close that Lemon down already
What’s lemon about it? One of the most reliable electricity plants in human history. Why not close fossil plants?
@@ryn4181
You're not familiar with it's history?
The government is already occupying the most scenic coastal sections of property , still keeping much off-limits to us who live here. The entire Balboa Headlands adjacent to Santa Monica was never going to allow Chumash artifacts with archeological significance impede the demand for luxury condos . I wandered New Mexico and Texas to study pueblo migration patterns that got wiped out with military bases imposed on the living spaces they lived in. Salvage Archeology sums up the process of sifting through any remaining vestige of that critical period between 800-1200 ce. The question of safely storing 3,000 radioactive rods on site while shallow active earthquake faults are even more hazardous with fracking activities closing in remains an acceptable risk to PG&E .