2001 Lost Deleted Scenes | Scribbles to Screen
HTML-код
- Опубликовано: 18 сен 2024
- Don’t forget to subscribe to the channel: Scribbles to Screen
Keep up-to-date by following me on social media!
Twitter: x.com/Scribble...
+ My personal Patreon 😉 / scribblestoscreen
I have to believe that Kubrick kept a copy of the full print at his home. The guy was a bit of a hoarder and kept many items from his films. There is a fascinating documentary called Kubrick's Boxes where the Kubrick family gave this director access to the director's storage unit and he went through the items collected, including fan mail which was divided into the good and bad. I found it on RUclips but I'm not sure if its since been removed. I don't know if it's available anywhere else. It's very interesting for anyone curious about Kubrick. He was known to be constantly tinkering with his old films so it's not improbable that he has that original cut of 2001. I'd love to see it. But I highly doubt that will ever happen.
Nice touch with playing "Neptune - the mystic" by Gustav Holst, in the Background :) Very fitting and it's also one of my favorite pieces of "The Planets".
HAL specifically tells Bowman that it will be **difficult** without his space helmet---not impossible, just difficult.
That was HAL's sense of humor.
that was HAL being a smart ass.
That was HAL being HAL.
I first saw this in the theater, when it came out, at 4-years-old. It blew my mind. I even wrote an adorably misspelled letter to Kubrick, asking for a "spaz zoot siz 8." Seen it, easy, 50 times since.
I think I was about 6 or 7....and saw it in a cinerama theater that had a circular auditorium! I could not believe my eyes. Everything looked so realistic. I had no idea what the meaning of the movie was afterward, but I didn't care.
This movie blew my mind when I finally saw it in big screen, 12 years after the premiere.
As long as WB releases the scenes separately from the entire movie, then they can say they are respectful of Kubrick’s cut of the movie. Perhaps for the 60th anniversary.
With regards to Dave Bowman being able to survive a few seconds of vacuum without his spacesuit helmet: Arthur Clarke believed that a prepared astronaut might survive more than 20 seconds of vacuum before sustaining any significant problems. One example of his is a description of such an event in the novel “Earthlight” 1955.
Clarke also noted that a trained astronaut wouldn't have taken a deep breath beforehand. Of course a trained astronaut also wouldn't have left his helmet behind.
It does seem possible provided you do not hold your breath, otherwise you will suffer an embolism. Fans of the The Expanse might note that a Belter in one scene did open his visor to vacuum in order to scratch an itch...
Yeah, he believed the worst issue would be sun burns.
@@chrisschumacher8553 As I recall Clark suggested hyperventilating before hand. (Don't ask me which book it was in.)
As you say it would be 'hard' to hold your breath due to the pressure difference. Clark was familiar with scuba diving, so he would have appreciated these issues when applied to the vacuum of space.
@@chrisschumacher8553 Test pilot trained Astronauts that we are used to, would do everything by the check list, not to make matters worse. But that’s not Hollywood!
There was also the scene where Bowman contacts Earth and gets a message back which explains why HAL went haywire, it also features one of the Earth-based HAL-9000 units. I've seen pictures of it here and there on the web.
I think that when I first saw the film in 1968 I had just turned 10 years old and it was released in 70 mm film on special projectors on a widescreen twice as wide as the usual 35 mm film print.
Happy 55th Anniversary to 2001: A Space Odyssey!
By the way, can you make a Lost Media video about the Australian children's band The Wiggles?
This includes the unaired TV pilot from 1995, the original version of "Wake Up Jeff!" from 1996, The Wiggles guest starring in an episode of the Australian soap opera Neighbours in 2001, etc.
I recall being quite 11:34 underwhelmed by 2010, the book and the film... I've come to judge the film a bit less harshly after learning Russian, noticing that Peter Hyams made an unusually thorough use of written and spoken Russian on board of the Alexei Leonov.
"2061: Odyssey Three" I've read just to clear my conscience, but it can be easily avoided, and it clearly doesn't deserve a film adaptation.
"3001: Final Odyssey", on the other hand, is one of a kind. Clarke openly reconnect with the wild imagination of his youth's "space operas" while introducing very modern themes, like the space elevator. A must read.
7:30 - The moment you realize Keir in real life now looks like his older self at the end of the film. Guess it was that or looking like a fetus.
A bit of info: the Floyd character's first name is Heywood.
I saw the film when I was just 9 years old when I saw 2001 opening week so my memory is not 100% reliable but I swear during the dawn of man section there was a brief scene where Moonwatcher is awoken by moonlight shining into the cave and he gets up and looks at the moon. But as I said I was young and read the novel within the next year so it's possible I am imagining it from the book. But it is pretty clear in my head so I think it was actually in the film.
I saw 2001 at the Warner Hollywod in Los Angeles for the first Weds matinee after it opened. It is possible that I saw the premier "uncut" version but I simply can't remember. Looking at a calendar that would have been 10 April 1968. I no longer have my ticket stub to confirm the date but I had saved it for many years. Kubrick had ordered cuts to be made on existing prints in the theaters until new revised prints could be distributed. From the accounts I read the cuts were finalized over the weekend 6-7 April. It is likely that I either saw a rough cut version or a revised print. I have no memory of the extended scenes mentioned here or in the various making of books. Not having eidetic memory I can't say for sure after all these years. I do have impression that the Dawn of Man sequence was longer. I seem to remember the shot of the tapir falling down being repeated. It could just be as a 12 year old found it to be boring.
This is Kubrick. If a scene is removed, it never existed.
Roy Scheider rhymes with Slider.
And Dullea rhymes with “delay.”
They were right to cut that interview about aliens bit from the movie. That would have completely killed the mystique and experimental feel of of the film with a cheap TV looking documentary crap. It NEEDED that iconic "Dawn of Man" part, not some banal, cheap attempt at beating the audience over the head with an obvious premise the movie didn't even have. it would make me think that some dopey looking guys in rubber suits would take over the movie.
The theory is that Kubrick made one version of the film to satisfy his sponsors, and the other intended for release. The sponsors expected the movie to be a fairly straightforward pro-space, pro-technology movie. And Kubrick produced a work of art. That was Kubrick being Kubrick.
And no he did not " fake" a moon landing. He did provide cbs simulation efx when lunar tx communication was down in an adjacent cbs studio across the street from the original broadcast station.
Well researched (apart from pronunciation of some names)
Great content, but had to switch on the subtitles as sometimes your narration was not clear.
Would an astronaut have called it a “space helmet “? Did they have football helmets onboard as well?
This is my kinda interest
The film never explains why he enters the air lock without a helmet, it pressurises and then he puts on the green space helmet to disconnect HAL... was there a cut scene there? [I know the book explains it...]
He was in a hurry to try to save Paul, so he probably just forgot the helmet, and he put on the first helmet he found afterwards.
@@unasushumana Poole, not Paul.
Bowman didn't expect to get locked out by HAL and he wasn't planning to do a spacewalk. He didn't need a helmet. But after he got back on board, he needed a helmet. Either HAL already vented the air into space or he might do that.
That's an organ, not a piano. You can see the stops above the keys.
The third en especially the fourth installments of the '2000' book series do indeed get more and more 'out there', and not in a good way. By the time he wrot the last one Clarke was bascially writing 'Clarke style fanfiction'.
could you absolutely hack pronouncing the actor's names any worse?
Piano? Hahaha, no.
What is wrong with Kubrick's face/mouth at 0:31 into the video? I suspect a HAL 9000 to be the cause!
Hello
I don’t care if those currently in possession of the deleted scenes want to respect Kubricks vision of the film, the deleted scenes my be released! Why hold onto them when you’re going to do anything with it?
CLICK BAIT!