Thank you so much. I've only been doing this for a few months and gain new viewers with each new video. The positivity from the viewers is so wonderful to see.
The comment on how audiences didnt seem ready or comfortable with sci fi is interesting. I have a story to share when you cover The Shape Of Things To Come from my Grandmother. But essentially a sense that people would lose their place in all the technology.
Whooops. Dracula was actually the first of the Universal Horror films. It preceded Frankenstein by almost a year. LOVE this series though... thank you for producing it!
It's clear that by now, movies had become established as a primary form of entertainment. I all about movies, but it was the sci-fi movies that initially sparked my interest. Just the ability to enjoy entertainers from a hundred years ago as shadows on a screen feels like science fiction to me. Thanks for the link to the pre-code Connecticut Yankee. I don't think I have that one.
No one can say you have not done your homework. I am a fan of sci fi films and 20th century movies in general especially from the 1930's to the late 1950's. You have brought forth some really interesting historical movies & plots that never seemed to go out of vogue to the hollywood writers, directors & producers. I never realized that Will Rogers made all those movies. I just assumed he was famous for being famous and his ability to stand up in front of a crowd while getting witty & keeping their attention riveted.
I'm looking forward to when you cover the serials of the later 30's. (Buck Rogers, Flash Gordon) Back then, a kid could spend a Saturday afternoon with cartoons, a serial and double feature with a box of popcorn and a soda for 15¢. Problem was not many kids had 15¢.
The studios made the serials with no budget. Re-used sets, same music. They were awesome! I can only imagine being a kid in the late 30's waiting for the next installment. Must have been like watching Star Wars once a week for 15 minutes at a time.
@@georgemarcouxjr6192 When I was a kid in the late 1970s and early 1980s, at one cinema in town every summer they did like a Saturday kids film series. It wasn't quite the same as seeing installments of the old serials, it was instead completely different films, but with the same kind of idea -- get the kids out of the house for a few hours for just a few bucks. I can't even remember what all we saw, but I do remember seeing the original theatrical release of Battlestar Galactica (including its original theatrical ending with Baltar losing his head), and some other stuff such as the dog movie Benji. We had a good time going to those, but I can see how the added thrill of seeing chapters of serialized Batman, Superman, Buck Rogers and Flash Gordon stories would have been more exciting!
What a superb and totally entertaining series! Your mix of movie analysis and other events of the year blend well, and your research and production/presentation is top notch. It was a dead easy choice to click the "subscribe" tab and I look forward to your future instalments. Congratulations on your efforts.
Another great video in this brilliant series! One remark: the photo at 29:30 is not from F.W. Murnau’s “Nosferatu” (1922) with Max Schreck in the title role. It shows Klaus Kinski as Nosferatu in the remake made by director Werner Herzog in 1979. But please go on with your otherwise good work! Can’t wait for the next episode!
PLEASE EXCUSE THE ALL CAPS DUE TO VISION PROBLEMS (AND NOT "YELLING" ;-) THIS HAS BEEN AN EXCELLENT, DETAILED AND BACKGROUND FILLED SEIRES. I CONTINUE TO SUBSCRIBE AN LOOK FORWARD TO THESE EPISODES AS YOU PROGRESS THROUGH THE YEARS, COVERING FILMS THAT HAVE BEEN IGNORED FOR FAR TOO LONG. I FIND IT VERY REFRESHING, FOR EXAMPLE, TO SEE LENGTHY COMMENT ON PROJECTS LIKE "THE END OF THE WORLD". "DELUGE" I SASME WIL ALSO BE FORTHCOMING. I HOPE YOU WILL ALSO INCLUDE "NON-TEOP NEW YORK" WHEN YOU GET TO 1936, EVEN IF THE SF CONTENT IS THIN. MY ONE OTHER SUGGESTION IS ONE RELATED TO GRAMMAR: WHEN SPEAKING ABOUT PEOPLE I HOPE YOU WILL CONSIDER USING THE MORE PROPER "WHO" RATHER THAN "THAT", AS IN "HE WAS THE ONE WHO INVENTED ....etc" RATHER THAN ""HE WAS THE ONE THAT INVENTED....etc". SOMEHOW MANY PODCASTERS AND REPORTERS HAVE SLIPPED INTO THIS RATHER CLUNKY GRAMMATICAL HABIT OF REFERRING TO PEOPLE AS IF THEY WERE OBJECTS, NOT LIVING BEINGS. (AND I'VE ALSO ALWAYS FELT THAT ANIMALS COULD ALSO BE CONSIDERED TO BE "WHO's" RATHER THAN "THAT's". TO ME, MY DOG IS A "WHO" NOT A "THAT". THANKS AGAIN FOR YOUR EXCELLENT WORK. I'M SURE THAT THESE EPISODES ARE QUITE TIME-CONSUMING TO RESEARCH AND MAKE!!
Thank you so much for your notes. I'm discovering many films of the early science fiction era as I research each video. We concentrate so much on the 1950s to the present. There are so many gems in the 1920s and 30s. I will try to be more mindful in the future about grammatical errors. I'm a one-person operation and try to improve with each video. Cheers.
@@marswantsmovies MY NOTE RE : "WHO" V. "THAT"IS MY ONLY SUCH THING I COULD BE PICKY ABOUT. EVERYTHING ELSE YOU'VE DONE HAS BEEN SPOT ON EXCELLENT. SO, REALLY, IT IS BECAUSE YOU'VE BEEN SO DARN CLOSE TO ABSOLUTE PERFECTION IN YOUR RESEARCH, COMMENTS AND VISUAL PRESENTATION THAT I BOTHERED TO MAKE THE MINOR "TWEAK" SUGGESTION AT ALL. AND, BTW, THIS PARTICULAR GRAMMATICAL HICCUP IS SUPER COMMON, A TREND THAT SEEMS TO HAVE DEVELOPED IN THE LAST 10 OR SO YEARS. (AND NOW I FEEL LIKE I AM VERY MUCH BELABORING THIS POIINT, SO I'LL JUST SHUT UP NOW. HA! ;-) AGAIN, APOLOGIES FOR THE ALL CAPS. MY VISION IS NOT WHAT IT USED TO BE/AM UNDERGOING TREATMENTS. GOOD WISHES.
Great coverage of 1931 films. I've just bought a copy of La Fin du Monde but not yet watched it so am looking forward to comparing it with your description. And I've watched the full Just Imagine, which was OK. The music was not at all like it was in 1980. ; - )
![Sci-Fi Classic Review: FRANKENSTEIN (1931) [REMASTERED]](http://i.ytimg.com/vi/Ua8SLHqlyD4/mqdefault.jpg)
Another winner!
Thank you.
I think your videos are criminality underrated. Thank you for putting out this equally comprehensive and fascinating cinema history series!
Thank you so much. I've only been doing this for a few months and gain new viewers with each new video. The positivity from the viewers is so wonderful to see.
The comment on how audiences didnt seem ready or comfortable with sci fi is interesting. I have a story to share when you cover The Shape Of Things To Come from my Grandmother.
But essentially a sense that people would lose their place in all the technology.
Looking forward to your story from your Grandmother.
Whooops. Dracula was actually the first of the Universal Horror films. It preceded Frankenstein by almost a year.
LOVE this series though... thank you for producing it!
Thank you so much. I hate making mistakes and I'm editing out the errors and it should be fixed in a few hours.
@@marswantsmovies Don't sweat it, this series is fantastic!
Another outstanding video!
Glad you enjoyed it!
Always waiting for a new post from you... Well done... :)
Thanks 😊
Brilliant, as always. I really like this format, can't wait for the next installment.
On to 1932 and beyond.
genius BW cinematography back in 31
The films of the 20s and 30s makes me really miss great black and white cinematography. When done right is absolutely stunning.
@@marswantsmovies - Jekyll and Hyde looks amazing just from your clips - love your content MWM - 🛸✨
@@FandersonUfo I've seen transformation sequences from films in the 1980s which didn't look as good (and/or not as well edited).
@@FreihEitner - indeed - superb work for sure back then
I really like this series Very comprehensive look at my favorite genre. Thank you for making it.
Glad you enjoy it! Thanks for watching.
I never know what to do when a RUclips responds to one of my Comments
It's clear that by now, movies had become established as a primary form of entertainment.
I all about movies, but it was the sci-fi movies that initially sparked my interest.
Just the ability to enjoy entertainers from a hundred years ago as shadows on a screen feels like science fiction to me.
Thanks for the link to the pre-code Connecticut Yankee. I don't think I have that one.
Connecticut Yankee is a charming film. I watched it for the first time for this video and quite enjoyed it.
No one can say you have not done your homework. I am a fan of sci fi films and 20th century movies in general especially from the 1930's to the late 1950's. You have brought forth some really interesting historical movies & plots that never seemed to go out of vogue to the hollywood writers, directors & producers. I never realized that Will Rogers made all those movies. I just assumed he was famous for being famous and his ability to stand up in front of a crowd while getting witty & keeping their attention riveted.
Awesome! Another great retrospective on early cinema with a sci-fi flavor.
Another winner! Thanks for including links to watch the movies discussed in this video.
I'm looking forward to when you cover the serials of the later 30's. (Buck Rogers, Flash Gordon) Back then, a kid could spend a Saturday afternoon with cartoons, a serial and double feature with a box of popcorn and a soda for 15¢. Problem was not many kids had 15¢.
I'm looking forward to Buck Rogers and Flash Gordon as well. Some exciting times ahead for sci-fi.
@@marswantsmovies Jean Rogers was the best Dale Arden. Keep up the great work Melissa!
The studios made the serials with no budget. Re-used sets, same music. They were awesome! I can only imagine being a kid in the late 30's waiting for the next installment. Must have been like watching Star Wars once a week for 15 minutes at a time.
@@georgemarcouxjr6192 When I was a kid in the late 1970s and early 1980s, at one cinema in town every summer they did like a Saturday kids film series. It wasn't quite the same as seeing installments of the old serials, it was instead completely different films, but with the same kind of idea -- get the kids out of the house for a few hours for just a few bucks. I can't even remember what all we saw, but I do remember seeing the original theatrical release of Battlestar Galactica (including its original theatrical ending with Baltar losing his head), and some other stuff such as the dog movie Benji.
We had a good time going to those, but I can see how the added thrill of seeing chapters of serialized Batman, Superman, Buck Rogers and Flash Gordon stories would have been more exciting!
What a superb and totally entertaining series! Your mix of movie analysis and other events of the year blend well, and your research and production/presentation is top notch. It was a dead easy choice to click the "subscribe" tab and I look forward to your future instalments. Congratulations on your efforts.
Another great video in this brilliant series! One remark: the photo at 29:30 is not from F.W. Murnau’s “Nosferatu” (1922) with Max Schreck in the title role. It shows Klaus Kinski as Nosferatu in the remake made by director Werner Herzog in 1979. But please go on with your otherwise good work! Can’t wait for the next episode!
Thanks for letting me know.
May I suggest making some sort of counter for nominations and awards at the Oscars to track How much representation The genre gets over the years
Great idea. I can do an update at the end of each decade and discuss sci-fi representation at awards and box office
PLEASE EXCUSE THE ALL CAPS DUE TO VISION PROBLEMS (AND NOT "YELLING" ;-)
THIS HAS BEEN AN EXCELLENT, DETAILED AND BACKGROUND FILLED SEIRES. I CONTINUE TO SUBSCRIBE AN LOOK FORWARD TO THESE EPISODES AS YOU PROGRESS THROUGH THE YEARS, COVERING FILMS THAT HAVE BEEN IGNORED FOR FAR TOO LONG. I FIND IT VERY REFRESHING, FOR EXAMPLE, TO SEE LENGTHY COMMENT ON PROJECTS LIKE "THE END OF THE WORLD". "DELUGE" I SASME WIL ALSO BE FORTHCOMING. I HOPE YOU WILL ALSO INCLUDE "NON-TEOP NEW YORK" WHEN YOU GET TO 1936, EVEN IF THE SF CONTENT IS THIN.
MY ONE OTHER SUGGESTION IS ONE RELATED TO GRAMMAR: WHEN SPEAKING ABOUT PEOPLE I HOPE YOU WILL CONSIDER USING THE MORE PROPER "WHO" RATHER THAN "THAT", AS IN "HE WAS THE ONE WHO INVENTED ....etc" RATHER THAN ""HE WAS THE ONE THAT INVENTED....etc". SOMEHOW MANY PODCASTERS AND REPORTERS HAVE SLIPPED INTO THIS RATHER CLUNKY GRAMMATICAL HABIT OF REFERRING TO PEOPLE AS IF THEY WERE OBJECTS, NOT LIVING BEINGS. (AND I'VE ALSO ALWAYS FELT THAT ANIMALS COULD ALSO BE CONSIDERED TO BE "WHO's" RATHER THAN "THAT's". TO ME, MY DOG IS A "WHO" NOT A "THAT".
THANKS AGAIN FOR YOUR EXCELLENT WORK. I'M SURE THAT THESE EPISODES ARE QUITE TIME-CONSUMING TO RESEARCH AND MAKE!!
Thank you so much for your notes. I'm discovering many films of the early science fiction era as I research each video. We concentrate so much on the 1950s to the present. There are so many gems in the 1920s and 30s. I will try to be more mindful in the future about grammatical errors. I'm a one-person operation and try to improve with each video. Cheers.
@@marswantsmovies MY NOTE RE : "WHO" V. "THAT"IS MY ONLY SUCH THING I COULD BE PICKY ABOUT. EVERYTHING ELSE YOU'VE DONE HAS BEEN SPOT ON EXCELLENT. SO, REALLY, IT IS BECAUSE YOU'VE BEEN SO DARN CLOSE TO ABSOLUTE PERFECTION IN YOUR RESEARCH, COMMENTS AND VISUAL PRESENTATION THAT I BOTHERED TO MAKE THE MINOR "TWEAK" SUGGESTION AT ALL. AND, BTW, THIS PARTICULAR GRAMMATICAL HICCUP IS SUPER COMMON, A TREND THAT SEEMS TO HAVE DEVELOPED IN THE LAST 10 OR SO YEARS. (AND NOW I FEEL LIKE I AM VERY MUCH BELABORING THIS POIINT, SO I'LL JUST SHUT UP NOW. HA! ;-)
AGAIN, APOLOGIES FOR THE ALL CAPS. MY VISION IS NOT WHAT IT USED TO BE/AM UNDERGOING TREATMENTS.
GOOD WISHES.
Great coverage of 1931 films. I've just bought a copy of La Fin du Monde but not yet watched it so am looking forward to comparing it with your description. And I've watched the full Just Imagine, which was OK. The music was not at all like it was in 1980. ; - )
The music of the 1980s turned out so much better than what they imagined in 1930. Love that decade.
The End of the World sounds like Don't Look Up.
But with a lot less sarcasm and no Meryl Streep. LOL
I'll apologize now -- I know I'm 43 years of cinema too early for this comment, but... "Abby someone."
I almost added a Young Frankenstein clip but it didn't fit the vibe of the video. I'm so looking forward to making videos about the 1970s.
Kkkkhhhhhhaaaaaannnnn!!!!!!!
I hate the artifical narration.